Australopithecine

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
(Redirected from Australopithecines)
Jump to: navigation, search
Australopithecines
Temporal range: Pliocene - Pleistocene 5.6–1.2 Ma
↓
Australopithecus sediba.JPG
Australopithecus sediba
Scientific classification e
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Clade: Synapsida
Class: Mammalia
Order: Primates
Suborder: Haplorhini
Family: Hominidae
Tribe: Hominini
Subtribe: Australopithecina
Gregory & Hellman, 1939
Type species
<templatestyles src="Noitalic/styles.css"/>†Australopithecus africanus
Dart, 1925
Genera

Lua error in Module:Taxonbar/candidate at line 22: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).

The term australopithecines refers generally to all species in the related genera of Australopithecus and Paranthropus, and it is typically intended to include members of Kenyanthropus,[2] Ardipithecus,[2] and Praeanthropus.[3] Further, all these related species are now collectively classified by some as a subtribe, Australopithecina, of the Hominini tribe.[4][5] They are the extinct, close relatives of humans and, with the extant genus Homo, comprise the human clade. Members of the human clade, that is, the Hominini after the split from the chimpanzees, are now called hominins[6] (see Hominidae; terms "hominids" and hominins).

The terms australopithecine, et al., come from a former classification as members of a distinct subfamily, the Australopithecinae.[7] Members of Australopithecus are sometimes referred to as the gracile australopithecines, while Paranthropus are called the "robust australopithecines".[8][9]

The australopithecines occurred in the Plio-Pleistocene era and were bipedal, and they were dentally similar to humans, but with a brain size not much larger than that of modern apes, with lesser encephalization than in the genus Homo.[10] Humans (genus Homo) may have descended from australopithecine ancestors and the genus Ardipithecus is a possible ancestor of the australopithecines.[9]

Phylogeny

Phylogeny of subtribe Australopithecina according to Briggs & Crowther 2008, p. 124.

Physical characteristics

The post-cranial remains of australopithecines show they were adapted to bipedal locomotion, but did not walk identically to humans. They have a high brachial index (forearm/upper arm ratio) when compared to other hominins, and they exhibit greater sexual dimorphism than members of Homo or Pan but less so than Gorilla or Pongo. It is thought that they averaged heights of 1.2–1.5 metres (3.9–4.9 ft) and weighed between 30 and 55 kilograms (66 and 121 lb). The brain size may have been 350 cc to 600 cc. The postcanines (the teeth behind the canines) were relatively large, and had more enamel compared to contemporary apes and humans, whereas the incisors and canines were relatively small, and there was little difference between the males' and females' canines compared to modern apes.[9]

Relation to Homo

Most scientists maintain that one of the australopithecine species evolved into the Homo genus in Africa around two million years ago. However, there is no consensus on which species:

<templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />

"Determining which species of australopithecine (if any) is ancestral to the genus Homo is a question that is a top priority for many paleoanthropologists, but one that will likely elude any conclusive answers for years to come. Nearly every possible species has been suggested as a likely candidate, but none are overwhelmingly convincing. Presently, it appears that A. garhi has the potential to occupy this coveted place in paleoanthropology, but the lack of fossil evidence is a serious problem. Another problem presents itself in the fact that it has been very difficult to assess which hominid [now "hominin"] represents the first member of the genus Homo. Without knowing this, it is not possible to determine which species of australopithecine may have been ancestral to Homo."[11]

Marc Verhaegen has argued that an australopithecines species could have also been ancestral to the Pan genus (i.e. chimpanzees).[12]

Asian australopithecines

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

See also: Meganthropus

A minority held viewpoint among palaeoanthropologists is that australopithecines moved outside of Africa. A notable proponent of this theory is Jens Lorenz Franzen, formerly Head of Paleoanthropology at the Research Institute Senckenberg. Franzen argues that robust australopithecines had reached not only Indonesia, as Meganthropus, but also China:

<templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />

"In this way we arrive at the conclusion that the recognition of australopithecines in Asia would not confuse but could help to clarify the early evolution of hominids ["hominins"] on that continent. This concept would explain the scanty remains from Java and China as relic of an Asian offshoot of an early radiation of Australopithecus, which was followed much later by an [African] immigration of Homo erectus, and finally became extinct after a period of coexistence."[13]

In 1957, an Early Pleistocene Chinese fossil tooth of unknown province was described as resembling P. robustus. Three fossilized molars from Jianshi, China (Longgudong Cave) were later identified as belonging to an Australopithecus species (Gao, 1975). However further examination questioned this interpretation; Zhang (1984) argued the Jianshi teeth and unidentified tooth belong to H. erectus. Liu et al. (2010) also dispute the Jianshi-australopithecine link and argue the Jianshi molars fall within the range of Homo erectus:

<templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />

"No marked difference in dental crown shape is shown between the Jianshi hominin and other Chinese Homo erectus, and there is also no evidence in support of the Jianshi hominin's closeness to Australopithecus."

But, Wolpoff (1999) notes that in China "persistent claims of australopithecine or australopithecine-like remains continue".

See also

Notes

  1. ↑ Stanford 2012.
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 Wood 2010.
  3. ↑ Cela-Conde & Ayala 2003.
  4. ↑ Wood & Richmond 2000.
  5. ↑ Briggs & Crowther 2008, p. 124.
  6. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  7. ↑ Kottak 2004.
  8. ↑ Mai, Owl & Kersting 2005.
  9. ↑ 9.0 9.1 9.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  10. ↑ Mai, Owl & Kersting 2005, p. 45.
  11. ↑ Szpak, 2007.
  12. ↑ Verhaegen M. (1990). "African ape ancestry". Human Evolution. 5(3): 295–297.
  13. ↑ Franzen, 1985.

References

  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Franzen, J. L. (1985). "Asian australopithecines?". In: Hominid Evolution: Past, Present, and Future. New York: Wiley-Liss, 255-263.
  • Gao, J. (1975). "Australopithecine teeth associated with Gigantopithecus". Vertebrata Palasiatica. 13(2): 81-88.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Liu, Wu, Ronald Clarke, and Song Xing. (2010). "Geometric morphometric analysis of the early Pleistocene hominin teeth from Jianshi, Hubei Province, China." Science China Earth Sciences. 53(8): 1141-1152.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Wolpoff, M. H. (1999). Paleoanthropology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Zhang, Y. (1985). "Gigantopithecus and “Australopithecus in China". In: Palaeoanthropology and palaeolithic archaeology in the People’s Republic of China, 69-78.

External links

Retrieved from "https://infogalactic.com/w/index.php?title=Australopithecine&oldid=2125266"