Georges Palante

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search
Georges Toussaint Léon Palante
Born November 20, 1862
Pas-de-Calais, France
Died August 5, 1925(1925-08-05) (aged 62)
Saint-Brieuc, France
Era 20th-century philosophy
Region Western Philosophy
School Nietzscheanism; precursor to existentialism
Main interests
Politics, ethics
Notable ideas

Georges Toussaint Léon Palante (November 20, 1862 – August 5, 1925) was a French philosopher and sociologist.

He advocated aristocratic individualist ideas similar to Nietzsche and Schopenhauer.[1] He was opposed to Émile Durkheim's holism, promoting methodological individualism instead.


Palante was born in Saint-Laurent-Blangy in the Pas-de-Calais, 20 November 1862. His father, Emile Palante, was an accountant from Liège. Palante's older brother, Emile, died when he was only five years old. He studied successively at the college of Arras, where he excelled in Latin, then at Lycée Louis-le-Grand where he earned his bachelor's degree.

He obtained a Bachelor of Arts at the University of Douai. In 1885, he began his career as professor of philosophy at Aurillac, where he met his future wife, Louise Genty, whom he married three years later. The couple had a daughter, Germaine, in 1890. Between 1886 and 1888, he studied in Châteauroux. In 1888 he received his Agrégation in philosophy.

He separated from his first wife in 1890 and was appointed to teach at the Lycée de Saint-Brieuc, Brittany, then in the following years at Valenciennes, La Rochelle and Niort. In 1893, he translated a work by Theobald Ziegler and began to publish articles. He returned in 1898 to the Lycée de Saint-Brieuc, at which he worked for the remainder of his teaching career. Meanwhile, he continued to work on his philosophical ideas, publishing articles and essays in journals. He published collections of his articles in various books, notably Combat pour l'individu (Fight for the Individual) (1904) and La Sensibilité individualiste (The Individualist Sensibility) (1909)

In 1907, he completed a draft doctoral thesis at the Sorbonne, but it was never authorized. However, he published the draft under the title Antinomies entre l'individu et la société (Antinomies between the individual and society) in 1912, expanding it two years later under the title Pessimisme et individualisme (Pessimism and Individualism).

Palante's house in Hillion

In 1908, he stood in municipal elections as a socialist candidate but was not elected. He took over from Jules de Gaultier at the philosophy journal Mercure de France, holding the position for 13 years. In 1916, he befriended the writer Louis Guilloux.

During this period he lived a bohemian lifestyle, drinking heavily and, notoriously, marking his students' essays in a local brothel.[2] He married his second wife, Louise Pierre, in 1923 and retired from teaching a year later.

On 5 August 1925 he died from a self-inflicted bullet wound to the head. The reasons for Palante's suicide are not certain, but he is known to have been suffering from acromegaly, a condition diagnosed when he was a student. A severe degenerative disease, which had no cure at time, it was making his life more and more painful.[2]


A thoroughgoing Individualist, he admired Nietzsche and showed early interest in the work of Freud.[3] His thinking is also critical towards the mass "herd instinct", which he thought oppresses and prevents individuals from developing fully.[4] He did not, however, oppose social networks, and insisted that his philosophy did not seek to destroy society for the benefit of the individual, but to help to build new networks of social interaction. In sociology, he objected to the holistic model espoused by Emile Durkheim.

Political ideology

Initially close to Socialist theories, although critical of Marxist state socialism, he increasingly rejected it as a political ideal, though he did participate in 1908 municipal elections as a Socialist candidate.[5] He rejected the label "anarchist", but his ideas are nevertheless often regarded as a form of anarchism or at least as libertarianism. His ideas have some commonality with classical liberalism, including his definition of the individual and his opposition to various barriers to trade. However, he opposed it in so far as, in his view, individual being is not determined by rational choice, since social determinism is constantly at work. In the economic field, he also objected to capitalists seeking profits to the detriment of the poor, and called for a "politics of the belly."


Louis Guilloux wrote Souvenirs sur Georges Palante (Memories of Georges Palante) and took his inspiration from Palante to model his character Cripure (short for Critique de la raison pure; in English, Critique of pure reason) in his novel Le Sang noir (Dark Blood). He also puts Palante's ideas into the mouths of characters in other novels.

He is quoted in one of the footnotes to Camus' classic treatise The Rebel. Jean Grenier who was Camus' philosophy teacher, met Palante and devoted a full chapter to him in his book Les Grèves (The Strikes).

Michel Onfray's thesis and first published book, Physiologie de Georges Palante (Georges Palante's Physiology) contributed to the renewed interest in his work. The 2002 and 2005 reissues of the book were subtitled portrait d’un nietzschéen de gauche (Portrait of a left-wing nietzschean).



  1. Palante's influences.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Michel Onfray, Physiologie de George Palante, Le Livre de Poche, 1989
  3. In 1916, he wrote:
    « Freud a raison de reconnaître l'importance énorme de la sexualité dans l'évolution psychologique de l'individu », cited by Yannick Pelletier, préface de L'individu en détresse.
  4. « À aucun moment, je ne "condamne" la socialisation de l'individu. Je la constate : voilà tout. Je constate d'une part une tendance de la société à socialiser l'individu, à l'assimiler le plus possible, et d'autre part une tendance de l'individu à la résistance, à la différenciation ; - et par suite un conflit nécessaire entre ces deux tendances. » Palante, Mercure de France, 16, December, 1912.
  5. « Dans la donnée marxiste le socialisme d'État est un régime aussi odieux que le régime actuel. Il ne faut pas l'appeler socialisme d'État, mais capitalisme d'État (Liebknecht), attendu qu'il veut concentrer tout le capital entre les mains de l'État pour perpétuer l'écrasement d'une classe par l'autre et pour " imposer à la démocratie le double joug de l'exploitation économique et de l'esclavage politique. " (Proposition Liebknecht.) » Preface to La Question sociale est une question morale by Theoblad Ziegler, translated by Palante.

External links