Lakeland Shores, Minnesota

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search
Lakeland Shores, Minnesota
City
Motto: "A Special Place To Be"
Location of the city of Lakeland Shoreswithin Washington County, Minnesota
Location of the city of Lakeland Shores
within Washington County, Minnesota
Coordinates: Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
Country United States
State Minnesota
County Washington
Area[1]
 • Total 0.73 sq mi (1.89 km2)
 • Land 0.32 sq mi (0.83 km2)
 • Water 0.41 sq mi (1.06 km2)
Elevation 735 ft (224 m)
Population (2010)[2]
 • Total 311
 • Estimate (2012[3]) 313
 • Density 971.9/sq mi (375.3/km2)
Time zone Central (CST) (UTC-6)
 • Summer (DST) CDT (UTC-5)
ZIP code 55043
Area code(s) 651
FIPS code 27-34658[4]
GNIS feature ID 0646407[5]
Website lakelandshores.govoffice.com

Lakeland Shores is a city in Washington County, Minnesota, United States. The population was 311 at the 2010 census.[6]

Geography

According to the United States Census Bureau, the city has a total area of 0.73 square miles (1.89 km2); 0.32 square miles (0.83 km2) is land and 0.41 square miles (1.06 km2) is water.[1] County 18 serves as a main route.

Demographics

Historical population
Census Pop.
1950 43
1960 52 20.9%
1970 72 38.5%
1980 171 137.5%
1990 291 70.2%
2000 355 22.0%
2010 311 −12.4%
Est. 2014 313 [7] 0.6%
U.S. Decennial Census[8]

2010 census

As of the census[2] of 2010, there were 311 people, 117 households, and 84 families residing in the city. The population density was 971.9 inhabitants per square mile (375.3/km2). There were 122 housing units at an average density of 381.3 per square mile (147.2/km2). The racial makeup of the city was 99.0% White, 0.3% Asian, 0.3% from other races, and 0.3% from two or more races. Hispanic or Latino of any race were 1.3% of the population.

There were 117 households of which 29.1% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 65.8% were married couples living together, 4.3% had a female householder with no husband present, 1.7% had a male householder with no wife present, and 28.2% were non-families. 17.1% of all households were made up of individuals and 4.3% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.66 and the average family size was 3.10.

The median age in the city was 46.6 years. 22.8% of residents were under the age of 18; 5.5% were between the ages of 18 and 24; 19.5% were from 25 to 44; 42.5% were from 45 to 64; and 9.6% were 65 years of age or older. The gender makeup of the city was 50.2% male and 49.8% female.

2000 census

As of the census[4] of 2000, there were 355 people, 116 households, and 93 families residing in the city. The population density was 1,092.8 people per square mile (428.3/km²). There were 121 housing units at an average density of 372.5 per square mile (146.0/km²). The racial makeup of the city was 99.72% White, and 0.28% from two or more races. Hispanic or Latino of any race were 1.41% of the population.

There were 116 households out of which 50.0% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 75.0% were married couples living together, 4.3% had a female householder with no husband present, and 19.8% were non-families. 16.4% of all households were made up of individuals and 7.8% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 3.06 and the average family size was 3.48.

In the city the population was spread out with 31.0% under the age of 18, 7.6% from 18 to 24, 23.4% from 25 to 44, 29.9% from 45 to 64, and 8.2% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 38 years. For every 100 females there were 117.8 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 104.2 males.

The median income for a household in the city was $80,907, and the median income for a family was $83,632. Males had a median income of $55,000 versus $35,000 for females. The per capita income for the city was $29,789. About 1.9% of families and 3.9% of the population were below the poverty line, including 4.5% of those under age 18 and 7.7% of those age 65 or over.

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  3. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  4. 4.0 4.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  5. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  6. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  7. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  8. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.