Suu Kyi trespasser incidents

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search
John Yettaw
100px
January 2010
Born John William Yettaw
1955
Detroit, Michigan
Residence Falcon, Missouri
Ethnicity White also with Native American ancestry[1]
Alma mater Drury University (psychology, sociology, criminal justice, and biology; 1997)
Occupation Psychology graduate student
Building contractor
Website John 7 Children (travel blog)

On 4 May 2009, the American citizen John Yettaw trespassed upon the residence of Burmese political prisoner Aung San Suu Kyi, two weeks before her scheduled release from house arrest on 27 May. This illegal visit prompted Suu Kyi's arrest on 13 May 2009.[2] Yettaw himself was arrested by Burmese authorities on 6 May. He was charged on 14 May with illegally entering a restricted zone, illegal swimming and breaking immigration laws.[3][4][5] It is illegal in Burma to have a guest stay overnight at one's home without notifying the authorities first.[6]

Their trial began 18 May 2009. On 11 August, Yettaw was sentenced on three counts totalling seven years, including four hard labour. Suu Kyi was sentenced to eighteen months of house arrest.[7][8] On 14 August, US Senator Jim Webb arrived in Burma and successfully negotiated Yettaw's release and 16 August deportation.[9]

Burmese authorities asserted that Yettaw's visits were instigated by opposition groups as part of efforts to pressure and embarrass the Burmese government.[10] International organisations and nations sympathetic to her cause said the charges against Suu Kyi were a ruse to extend her detention beyond the 2010 scheduled elections.[10]

2008 visit

In May 2008, Yettaw and his teenage son took a lengthy trip to Asia. His son did not return home until school started again in September. Yettaw then travelled to Mae Sot, Thailand, where he took up residence in a hotel, bought a motorcycle and developed a friendship with a Thai resident. He developed a deep interest in Suu Kyi and told people that he had to bring international attention to her situation. He tried unsuccessfully to get work at Thai NGOs. In October, after having a vision that he was a defender of the oppressed, he left Mae Sot without paying any of his bills. On 27 October in Bangkok, Thailand, he obtained his Burma visa. On 7 November he flew to Yangon.[5]

On 30 November, he reached Suu Kyi's home by swimming across Lake Inya. He entered the property via a culvert on University Avenue and Inya Myaing Road. He then made his way over a small fence behind the house, which was a restricted zone and was without communication devices. Burmese authorities had forbidden Suu Kyi from having contact with outsiders.[3][11] His trek was successful despite her residence being surrounded by over a dozen security guards 24 hours a day, and despite the presence of police boats that frequently patrolled local waters.[12] Yettaw was prevented by the house staff from communicating with Suu Kyi, but he stayed there for a period of longer than two days.[3]

During this initial visit, Yettaw gave Suu Kyi at least six books, including The Book of Mormon, along with a letter written by Yettaw's daughter. This letter was later ripped up by Suu Kyi.[4][13] Suu Kyi reported Yettaw's visit to her doctor who alerted authorities. Authorities took no action.[14] He left the property via the same route he arrived.[11] According to Yettaw, upon his departure from her house, police officers apprehended him, aimed guns at him, asked "What are you doing here?", but then let him go.[15][16]

Unable to fly out of Bangkok, Thailand due to political protests involving the seizure of Suvarnabhumi International Airport, Yettaw laid over at the Highland Hotel in Mae Sot, Thailand for over a month. There he spoke openly to several people about his failed attempt to see Suu Kyi and his plans to try again. During this time he frequently visited refugee schools and met the children. He was often seen with a Thai woman.[17] He also visited the Mae Tao Clinic nearly a dozen times, where he communicated with Bo Kyi of the Assistance Association for Political Prisoners.[11]

As of May 2009, Yettaw was still paying off the travel cost of his 2008 visit.[4]

2009 visit and arrest

2009 swim to Suu Kyi's residence
JWYettaw images on confiscated film.jpg
Self-portraiture on camera in Yettaw's possession at the time of his arrest: shown attached to Yettaw's sandals are homemade swimfins fashioned of heavy paperboard
Date 4 May 2009
Location Lake Inya
Residence at 54 University Avenue, Yangon, Burma, where Aung San Suu Kyi was being held under house arrest
Participants John Yettaw
Outcome Arrests of Yettaw, Suu Kyi and her two housekeepers Khin Khin Win and Ma Win Ma Ma on 6 May 2009
Suu Kyi's sentence: 18 months house arrest
Khin Khin Win and Win Ma Ma sentences: identical with Suu Kyi's
Yettaw's sentence: 7 years imprisonment, 4 of which, hard labour. (Yettaw's sentence was subsequently commuted to three and a half years, which itself was suspended upon his deportation from Burma on 16 August 2009.)[18]

In mid-April 2009 Yettaw travelled from Missouri to California to see an ex-wife. He informed her that he needed to go to Asia to obtain details on a paper he was writing about forgiveness. On 20 April, Yettaw flew to Bangkok, leaving his children with various friends.[5][19] He told his family that he was working on a book and searching for US soldiers missing in action from the Vietnam War.[20] According to Yettaw’s wife, he wanted to interview Suu Kyi about forgiveness and resilience.[4] Soon thereafter, Yettaw visited exiled Burmese groups in Thailand and told them about a faith-based book he was writing on heroism.[6] Yettaw spent a week in Bangkok waiting for his Burma visa to clear.[5]

On the evening of 3 May 2009, Yettaw swam a 2-kilometre (1.2 mi) distance across Lake Inya in Yangon to the house where Aung San Suu Kyi was held under house arrest by Burmese authorities. He planned his route across the lake using Google Earth.[3] Some policemen saw him during his swim and threw rocks at him.[15]

Using the same route he used during the 2008 visit, via the culvert, and over a small fence, Yettaw successfully evaded the government security guards and entered Suu Kyi's residence at 5 am on 4 May.[11][21][22] He entered the house by climbing up a drain.[23] Inside, he came upon Suu Kyi's two female assistants, Khin Khin Win and Ma Win Ma Ma, a mother and daughter, Suu Kyi's sole sanctioned companions.[3][24] He informed them that he was tired, hungry and suffered from diabetes. The women fed him.[3] He asked Suu Kyi if he could stay at the house for a few days. She refused, and her caretakers threatened to turn him in to the authorities, but Suu Kyi agreed to let him stay on the ground floor after he began to complain about leg cramps. During his stay, they provided him with rehydration salts and meals. Some of his time there he devoted to prayer.[21][23]

The Burmese government requires all non-family overnight visitors to be registered and forbids overnight stays by foreigners.[3] According to Suu Kyi and her assistants, he stayed there as an uninvited, unwelcomed guest. Yettaw's family later stated that he was "well-intentioned" and "unaware of the possible consequences."[23]

Yettaw left the house just before midnight (11:45 pm) on 4 May, the same day he arrived, although some accounts allege he left on 5 May.[3][22] He then swam towards the home of the US Counselor, which shares a fence with Kanthaya Hospital.[11] According to Burmese officials, Yettaw left behind "two black chadors, two black scarves, two long skirts, one red torch light, six color pencils in a plastic bag, three pairs of sunglasses, two signal lights, a pair of swimming glasses, one two-pin plug, two pieces of circuit wire, one recharger, a black bag with a zip in it that was used to keep the apparatuses, a plastic bag with a zip in it, two pairs of gray stockings, five parts of an English book, and a bag with pieces of torn paper sheets in it."[21] At 5 AM on 5 May Yettaw was apprehended by police near the International Business Center and the US embassy on the lake's west bank, less than 100 feet from the US counselor's home.[11][12]

Arrest and fallout

Originally scheduled to return to the United States 24 June, Yettaw was arrested 6 May and taken to Insein prison; on 14 May he was charged with illegally entering a restricted zone, illegal swimming and breaking immigration laws.[3][4][4][5] Illegal entry carries a maximum penalty of five years in prison; immigration violations carry up to one year in jail.[4] Yettaw shared his cell with two Burmese prisoners. He refused to eat food, hoping to induce another vision.[5]

Upon his arrest he was carrying two empty five-litre plastic bottles, two small bags, his US passport, a flashlight, a camera protected by plastic wrap, a pair of pliers, a screw driver, a pair of folding pliers with laser, six memory cards, a torch light with dry cells, 28 separate dry cells, a hat, a white shirt with long sleeves, a pair of trousers, seven paper sheets with written English words, two paper sheets with printed words, two envelopes, two $100 bills, two $10 bills, one $50 bill, ninety-three 1000-kyat notes, and 10 visiting cards. Pictures on his camera included photographs of Aung San, a fighting peacock and a bookshelf.[3][11]

As a result of the 2009 visit, the authorities declared that Suu Kyi breached the conditions of her house arrest.[25] She was charged under the country's Law Safeguarding the State from the Dangers of Subversive Elements, which carried a three-to-five-year jail term. She and her two caretakers, Khin Khin Win and Ma Win Ma Ma, were removed to the Insein prison, where they stayed for the duration of the trial. According to Police Brigadier General Myint Thein, prior to the Yettaw visit, authorities had considered letting Suu Kyi go free, but the incident "infringed on existing law and we unavoidably and regretfully had to take legal action against her."[26]

Suu Kyi’s followers insisted that the government used this incident to continue her detention until after the 2010 general elections.[4] Other supporters have raised suspicions that the incident was constructed by the government.[3] The Burmese government alleges that Yettaw's visit involved a conspiracy of "internal and external anti-government elements" meant "to intensify international pressure" to release Suu Kyi.[10] Her lawyer Kyi Win said on 14 May: "Everyone is irritated with this American. All of these problems are his fault. He is a fool. Suu Kyi begged him to go back, but he said he was too tired. He slept overnight on the first floor." [7] However, two weeks later her defence lawyer Nyan Win stated that "Daw Aung San Suu Kyi said she bore no grudge against Mr. Yettaw or his family."[27]

Authorities closely investigated security lapses involving Yettaw's visits. It was announced on 7 August that after questioning sixty-one security members of the police battalion in question, one Police Lieutenant Colonel was demoted, an undisclosed number of personnel were given three- to six-month prison terms for dereliction of duty, and over twenty others received actions against them under a Police Disciplinary Rule.[28]

Tin Myo Win, Suu Kyi's physician, was under investigation as a conspirator but was released before the trial began.[6][29]

Trial

The criminal case, #47/2009, levied against Yettaw, Suu Kyi, Khin Win and Ma Ma, began 18 May 2009 in the Yangon North District Court.[30] Suu Kyi and Yettaw each pleaded not guilty to their charges.[5]

On the first day a US consular officer was present to observe. U Khin Maung Oo represented Yettaw.[31] Yettaw faced charges relating to, according to the United States State Department, "immigration, trespassing into a restricted zone, and violating a law that protects the state from those desiring to cause subversive acts."[29] The first day's witnesses included the two police officers who apprehended Yettaw in Inya Lake after he swam away from Suu Kyi's house. The officers initially thought Yettaw was a thief. When they discovered he was a foreigner, they turned him over to the Special Branch, which usually handles political cases.[2]

On 20 May, police major Tin Zaw Htun was called by the prosecution to testify. Htun provided details of items Yettaw left at Suu Kyi's home, including three pair of sunglasses and two abaya-like dresses. The dresses and sunglasses were modelled for the court by two women.[32] The Burmese government alleged that Yettaw used these garments to disguise himself.[10] When questioned about these and other items left behind, Suu Kyi explained that Yettaw had left them for her as presents.[21] Police captain Sa Kyaw Win was also called by the prosecution. He testified that on 6 May he seized sixty-one items from Yettaw's room on the fifth floor of the Beauty Land Hotel in Yangon.[21] Confiscated items included: a Sony camcorder (DCR SR 45) and charger, a pair of Bushnell night glasses (3x40), a vocal translator, a Nokia 3110-C phone and charger, a battery charger, a 4 GB Memory stick, a pair of scissors, a map published by Myanmar Tourism Service, and money hidden in a phone book.[11][21]

On 21 May, prosecutors submitted for evidence a video Yettaw created with the intent of uploading it onto YouTube. The video began with a shot of a photograph of Aung San and then a shot of Yettaw beside the photograph. Yettaw's voice-over explained that he was at Suu Kyi's home, that he asked her if he could film her, but she declined. "She looked nervous," Yettaw's narration explains, "and I am sorry for that."[33]

On 26 May, Suu Kyi took the stand to defend herself. When asked about Yettaw's visit, she testified that she and her assistants urged him to leave, and let him rest there for the day, but that he left her home before midnight.[22] In response to questions about items Yettaw left behind, she said "I don’t know if Mr. Yettaw had forgotten to take them or left them. Only Mr. Yettaw will know."[34] Later that day Burmese authorities officially lifted her house arrest, but continued to detain her in prison,[35] although another government official stated that her house arrest did not expire for another six months.[15]

On 27 May, the court heard testimony from Yettaw and Suu Kyi's two caretakers, Khin Khin Win and Ma Win Ma Ma.[24] Her caretakers testified for 30 minutes each, and Yettaw testified for nearly three hours. He stated repeatedly that he was sent on this journey by God to protect Suu Kyi from a terrorist group trying to assassinate her. He stated that he was seen by policemen as he swam across the lake, and that they did not fire guns at him, but threw rocks instead. He also stated that he had tried to enter Suu Kyi's previously, that police apprehended him, questioned him briefly and then let him go.[15] The same day Suu Kyi released a statement alleging that Burmese authorities were to blame for Yettaw's security breach. She had reported Yettaw's unwelcomed 2008 visit to authorities, but no action was ever taken.[14]

On 28 May, the defence's only witness, U Kyi Win, took the stand. He stated that Yettaw entered Suu Kyi's restricted residence twice and each time security guards allowed it, and therefore they had also violated the law. Furthermore, because no action was taken by the security guards, then Yettaw, Suu Kyi and her assistants were not guilty of the charges. Through further questioning by Yettaw's lawyer, U Khin Maung Oo, U Kyi Win added that the property Yettaw entered did not belong to Suu Kyi but instead belonged to the State because the government had official security guards around it. He also made the argument that the charges against Suu Kyi fall under parts of the law that were based on the now abolished 1974 constitution, and therefore are invalid.[30]

Yettaw then took the stand. Yettaw stated that, on his own accord, he entered the property on the morning of 4 May, that he left the property about midnight on 5 May. Under cross-examination, Yettaw stated that in November 2008 and May 2009 he applied for Visas to visit Yangon, during which time he signed an agreement that he would respect Burma's laws and visa rules. He acknowledged that he entered the property secretly and without permission, that he knew the property was guarded. He also stated that he did not mean to break any immigration laws.[30] In the afternoon authorities brought Yettaw to University Avenue and had him explain how he crossed Inya Lake. Yettaw explained how he entered the lake through a small drain on University Avenue and Than Lwin Street. University Avenue was closed off for an hour and a half during his explanation.[36] The court then announced that the original verdict date of 29 May was to be postponed, and that final arguments would be made 1 June.[16] Of the eight days of proceedings, only two were open to journalists and diplomats.[16] Also, Suu Kyi's lawyers were barred from discussions with her and authorities allowed none of them time to prepare her testimony.[37]

The trial judge originally accepted only one of the four witnesses offered by the defence, while accepting fourteen of the twenty-three government witnesses,[15] but on 3 June Yangon's Divisional Court agreed to hear an appeal from the defence to re-admit three witnesses: Win Tin, Tin Oo and Khin Moe Moe, all members of the National League for Democracy. The appeal was set for 5 June, but not until 9 June did the Divisional Court agree to allow Khin Moe Moe's testimony.[38][39] Her lawyers then sent an appeal to the High Court to allow the other two witnesses.[39] The appeal was accepted by the Court and scheduled for 17 June. Closing arguments were re-scheduled for 12 June, but Suu Kyi's lawyers requested and had granted an adjournment until 26 June to allow Moe Moe to testify at the trial. Moe Moe needed time to travel from Shan State and to prepare.[40]

On 11 June 2009, Suu Kyi wrote a letter to the court explaining that after asking Yettaw to leave, she allowed him to stay overnight in order that he might avoid arrest and on the excuse of his health condition.[41] On 24 June, the Burmese Supreme Court heard arguments from Suu Kyi's lawyers for allowing two more defence witnesses to testify. Judges argued that, because Tin Oo was under house arrest and because Win Tin said things in interviews with the Democratic Voice of Burma that were critical of the Burmese government, they should not be allowed to testify.[42] Five days later the Court officially rejected the two witnesses.[43]

On 26 June, the Court set Moe Moe's appearance for 3 July.[42] On the same day United Nations envoy Ibrahim Gambari arrived in Naypyidaw and met with foreign minister Nyan Win. He was not able to meet with Suu Kyi, but did request that Burma free its political prisoners. The expressed purpose of Gambari's visit was to open the door for a visit by U.N. chief Ban Ki-moon.[44] Ban arrived in Naypyitaw on 3 July, but after two days of talks with General Than Shwe, Ban was unable to negotiate a visit with Suu Kyi and left without any progress.[45]

On 3 July, the Court announced the adjournment was extended for another week.[46] Defense witness Khin Moe Moe took the stand 10 July, testifying for six hours (from 10 AM to 5 PM with an hour lunch at noon). Moe Moe and the defence team argued that the law under which Suu Kyi was being tried, Section 22, which protects the government from people planning subversive acts, was created under the 1974 Constitution, which was abolished by the current Burmese government in 1988. He was the last witness of the trial. Final arguments were set by the Court for 24 July.[47]

On 24 July, Suu Kyi's defence gave a 30-page closing statement.[48] British, German, Norwegian, French and Italian diplomats were present, marking only the third time during the entire trial Burmese officials had allowed such access.[49] The trial was then adjourned over the weekend until 27 July, providing the prosecution more time to prepare.[48]

On 27 July, the defence team submitted an application to the court to call an additional witness, Nyunt Maung Shein, a Burmese foreign ministry official. Final arguments were presented for Yettaw, Khin Win and Ma Ma. The morning session was attended by diplomats from Australia, Japan, Singapore, the United States, the Philippines and Malaysia, while in the afternoon only US Consul Colin Furst was in attendance.[50] The final defence arguments, including a 15-minute statement from Yettaw, concluded 28 July. Again, diplomats from the US, Japan, Singapore and Thailand were present.[51] The Court announced the verdicts would be made 31 July.[52] Officials then notified shops in the vicinity to be closed 31 July. Two police battalions also arrived to support the already existing security forces.[53] However, on 31 July judges Thaung Nyunt and Nyi Nyi Soe, citing an undisclosed problem with the legal procedures, adjourned the trial until 11 August, three days after the anniversary of the 8888 Uprising. After the announcement, Yettaw moved about the courtroom and said "I love you" to the defence team.[54]

The verdict came on 11 August. Yettaw was condemned to a total of seven years: three for violating Suu Kyi's house arrest, three hard labour for breaking immigration laws, and one hard labour for trespassing. Suu Kyi was initially sentenced to three years of hard labour, but after a five-minute recess, Than Shwe reduced it to eighteen months of house arrest. Khin Khin Win and Ma Win Ma were also sentenced to eighteen months.[8]

Health issues during the trial

On 8 May, Yettaw began to decline food, claiming religious reasons, and accepted only water.[55] On 9 July, he was removed to Insein Prison hospital because he was still refusing food. There authorities began feeding him intravenously.[55]

On 3 August, Yettaw was taken from Insein prison and admitted to Yangon General Hospital after having seizures. He was isolated in intensive care in a heavily guarded separate room and treated by neurological specialists. Previous to this incident, Yettaw had been held in the prison's hospital where he received regular treatment for his seizures and diabetic and heart conditions.[56] Two days later, Yettaw was visited by US Embassy official Colin Furst. The same day, defence lawyer Nyan Win expressed concern that Yettaw's condition may further delay the trial because "The court normally doesn't make judgment in the absence of the accused."[57] Yettaw remained in intensive care throughout the week. On 7 August, he suffered three more fits, according to Police Brigadier General Khin Yee.[28] Yettaw was discharged 10 August.[8]

Release from Burma

On 12 August 2009, US Senator Jim Webb negotiated Yettaw's release on humanitarian grounds because of Yettaw's health. Burmese authorities commuted Yettaw's sentence in half, suspending the remaining three-and-a-half years upon Yettaw's deportation.[58] On 14 August, Senator Webb flew with Yettaw to Thailand. Yettaw had to be helped off the plane. He gave reporters an "I love you" sign, but did not respond to any questions. He was immediately placed in an undisclosed Bangkok hospital. The next day he underwent medical testing. According to Senator Webb and Yettaw's family members, Yettaw was not in good health.[59]

On 19 August, Yettaw made a near 24-hour trip from Bangkok to the United States, landing first in Chicago and then flying on to Springfield, Missouri. While transferring planes in O'Hare International Airport, he was in a wheelchair and wore a surgical mask. He said to reporters there "If I had to do it again, I would do it a hundred times, a hundred times, to save her life", also adding "That they locked her up; it just breaks my heart." He refused a later question by saying "I wish I could talk more. I can't." He then made a zipper motion over his lips. Upon his arrival at Springfield-Branson National Airport, at the request of his family, Yettaw was escorted out the side of the airport to avoid the media.[60]

Biography of Yettaw

Yettaw was born in Detroit, Michigan, in 1955. Yettaw lived with relatives in California for a time until he was able to join the United States Army.[5] He served for just over a year before being discharged, spending a majority of that time in Germany according to his military records.[5] His family has said that Yettaw told them that he has served stints in the US military in several countries of Southeast Asia.[5] Yettaw was diagnosed around 1999 with post-traumatic stress disorder related to his military service.[38]

At age 20, Yettaw married for the first time in southern California,[5] later converting to The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS). In southern California, Yettaw had been licensed as a general contractor.[4][7][11][20]

As of 2009, Yettaw lived in Missouri, and was in custody of four minor-aged children from a subsequent marriage.[3][4] Yettaw graduated from Drury University in 1997 cum laude, where he earned degrees in multiple majors. More recently, he was enrolled in a doctoral program at the Forest Institute's School of Professional Psychology (Springfield, Missouri campus), leaving the program in 2007.[5]

See also

References

  1. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  3. ↑ 3.00 3.01 3.02 3.03 3.04 3.05 3.06 3.07 3.08 3.09 3.10 3.11 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  4. ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.8 4.9 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  5. ↑ 5.00 5.01 5.02 5.03 5.04 5.05 5.06 5.07 5.08 5.09 5.10 5.11 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  6. ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  7. ↑ 7.0 7.1 7.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "bbc14" defined multiple times with different content
  8. ↑ 8.0 8.1 8.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  9. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  10. ↑ 10.0 10.1 10.2 10.3 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  11. ↑ 11.0 11.1 11.2 11.3 11.4 11.5 11.6 11.7 11.8 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "newlight" defined multiple times with different content
  12. ↑ 12.0 12.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  13. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  14. ↑ 14.0 14.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  15. ↑ 15.0 15.1 15.2 15.3 15.4 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  16. ↑ 16.0 16.1 16.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  17. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  18. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  19. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  20. ↑ 20.0 20.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  21. ↑ 21.0 21.1 21.2 21.3 21.4 21.5 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  22. ↑ 22.0 22.1 22.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  23. ↑ 23.0 23.1 23.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  24. ↑ 24.0 24.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  25. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  26. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  27. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  28. ↑ 28.0 28.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  29. ↑ 29.0 29.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  30. ↑ 30.0 30.1 30.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  31. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  32. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  33. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  34. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  35. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  36. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  37. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  38. ↑ 38.0 38.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "googleap" defined multiple times with different content
  39. ↑ 39.0 39.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  40. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  41. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  42. ↑ 42.0 42.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  43. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  44. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  45. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  46. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  47. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  48. ↑ 48.0 48.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  49. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  50. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  51. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  52. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  53. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  54. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  55. ↑ 55.0 55.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  56. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  57. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  58. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  59. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  60. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

External links

Retrieved from "https://infogalactic.com/w/index.php?title=Suu_Kyi_trespasser_incidents&oldid=719415178"