The Stuff of Thought
| File:StuffOfThought.jpg
Cover of the first edition
|
|
| Author | Steven Pinker |
|---|---|
| Country | United States |
| Language | English |
| Subject | Philosophy |
| Publisher | Penguin Group (Viking Press) |
|
Publication date
|
2007 |
| Media type | |
| Pages | 499 |
| ISBN | 978-0-670-06327-7 |
| OCLC | 154308853 |
| 401 22 | |
| LC Class | P107 .P548 2007 |
| Preceded by | The Blank Slate |
The Stuff of Thought: Language As a Window Into Human Nature is a 2007 book by experimental psychologist Steven Pinker. In this—his fifth book on the topics of language and cognitive science written for a general audience—Pinker "analyzes how our words relate to thoughts and to the world around us and reveals what this tells us about ourselves".[1] Put another way, Pinker "probes the mystery of human nature by examining how we use words".[2] The book became a New York Times best seller.
Contents
Summary
Pinker argues that language provides a window into human nature, and that "analyzing language can reveal what people are thinking and feeling." He asserts that language must do two things:
- convey a message to an audience, and
- negotiate the social relationship between the speaker and the audience.
Therefore, language functions at these two levels at all times. For example, a common-place statement such as "If you could pass the salt, that would be great" functions both as a request (though formally not a request) and as a means of being polite or non-offensive (through not directing the audience to overt demands). Pinker says of this example:
<templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />
It's become so common that we don't even notice that it is a philosophical rumination rather than a direct imperative. It's a bit of a social dilemma. On the one hand, you do want the salt. On the other hand, you don't want to boss people around lightly. So you split the difference by saying something that literally makes no sense while also conveying the message that you're not treating them like some kind of flunky.[3]
Through this lens, Pinker asks questions such as "What does the peculiar syntax of swearing tell us about ourselves?" Or put another way, "Just what does the 'fuck' in 'fuck you' actually mean?",[1] - as discussed in the chapter The Seven Words You Can't Say on Television. The arguments contained within ride on the backs of his previous works, which paint human nature as having "distinct and universal properties, some of which are innate – determined at birth by genes rather than shaped primarily by environment."[3]
See also
References
External links
- Steven Pinker's Harvard Department of Psychology website
- Douglas Hofstadter's review for The Los Angeles Times [1]
- William Saletan's review for The New York Times Book Review, [2]
- Seth Lerer's review for The New York Sun, [3]
