United States v. Gouveia
From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
| United States v. Gouveia | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||
| Argued March 20, 1984 Decided May 29, 1984 |
|||||
| Full case name | United States v. William Gouveia, et al. | ||||
| Citations | 467 U.S. 180 (more)
104 S. Ct. 2292; 81 L. Ed. 2d 146; 1984 U.S. LEXIS 91; 52 U.S.L.W. 4659
|
||||
| Prior history | Cert. to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | ||||
| Court membership | |||||
|
|||||
| Case opinions | |||||
| Majority | Rehnquist, joined by Burger, White, Blackmun, Powell, O'Connor | ||||
| Concurrence | Stevens, joined by Brennan | ||||
| Dissent | Marshall | ||||
| Laws applied | |||||
| U.S. Const. amend. VI | |||||
United States v. Gouveia, 467 U.S. 180 (1984)[1], was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that prisoners in administrative segregation pending the investigation of crimes committed within the prison had no Sixth Amendment entitlement to counsel prior to the initiation of adversary judicial proceedings against them.
See also
External links
<templatestyles src="Asbox/styles.css"></templatestyles>
|
This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
