Case |
Issue |
Joined by |
|
|
Unanimous |
|
|
|
Rehnquist, Stevens, O'Connor, Ginsburg, Breyer |
Scalia and Thomas filed dissents. |
|
|
Rehnquist, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas |
Ginsburg and Breyer filed dissents. |
|
|
Rehnquist, O'Connor, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer |
Stevens filed a dissent. |
|
|
Scalia |
|
|
|
|
Souter was the sole dissenter from Scalia's opinion. |
|
|
Ginsburg |
Souter filed one of three dissents. |
|
Bankruptcy; state sovereign immunity |
Ginsburg |
|
|
Americans with Disabilities Act; state sovereign immunity |
Ginsburg |
|
|
|
Rehnquist, Stevens, O'Connor, Ginsburg, Breyer; Scalia, Kennedy (in part) |
|
|
|
Unanimous |
|
|
|
Kennedy |
|
|
Criminal procedure |
Rehnquist, Stevens, O'Connor, Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer |
Souter's opinion for the Court held that a defendant attempting to reverse his conviction due to a Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 violation must show a reasonable probability that, but for the trial court's error in failing to advise him his guilty plea could not be withdrawn, he would not have entered the plea. Justice Antonin Scalia concurred in the judgment but disagreed with Souter's standard. |
|
|
Ginsburg |
Souter filed one of two dissents from Thomas' 5-4 decision. |
|
Due process; habeas corpus |
Ginsburg |
|
|
|
Stevens, Ginsburg, Breyer |
|
|
|
Stevens, Ginsburg |
|
|
|
Stevens, O'Connor, Kennedy; Rehnquist, Scalia, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer (in part) |
|