2016 United States presidential election

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

2016 United States presidential election

← 2012 November 8, 2016 2020 →

538 members of the Electoral College
270 electoral votes needed to win
Opinion polls
Turnout 55.7%[1] Increase 0.8 pp
  Donald Trump official portrait (cropped).jpg Hillary Clinton by Gage Skidmore 2.jpg
Nominee Donald Trump Hillary Clinton
Party Republican Democratic
Home state New York New York
Running mate Mike Pence Tim Kaine
Electoral vote 304[lower-alpha 1] 227[lower-alpha 1]
States carried 30 + ME-02 20 + DC
Popular vote 62,984,828 65,853,514
Percentage 46.1% 48.2%

Template:2016 United States presidential election imagemap
The results map, showing states won by Trump (red) and by Clinton (blue). Numbers denote the electoral votes allocated to each state plus the District of Columbia. Trump received 304 and Clinton 227, as 7 faithless electors, 2 pledged to Trump and 5 to Clinton, voted for other candidates.

President before election

Barack Obama
Democratic

Elected President

Donald Trump
Republican

Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

The 2016 United States presidential election was the 58th quadrennial presidential election, held on Tuesday, November 8, 2016. The Republican ticket of businessman Donald Trump and Indiana Governor Mike Pence defeated the Democratic ticket of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and U.S. Senator from Virginia Tim Kaine, despite losing the popular vote.[2] Trump took office as the 45th president, and Pence as the 48th vice president, on January 20, 2017.

Trump emerged as his party's front-runner amidst a wide field of Republican primary candidates, while Clinton defeated Senator Bernie Sanders and became the first female presidential nominee of a major American party. Trump's populist, nationalist campaign, which promised to "Make America Great Again" and opposed political correctness, illegal immigration, and many free-trade agreements,[3] garnered extensive free media coverage.[4][5] Clinton emphasized her extensive political experience, denounced Trump and many of his supporters as bigots, and advocated the expansion of President Obama's policies; racial, LGBT, and women's rights; and "inclusive capitalism".[6] The tone of the general election campaign was widely characterized as divisive and negative.[7][8][9] Trump faced controversy over his views on race and immigration, incidents of violence against protestors at his rallies,[10][11][12] and numerous sexual misconduct allegations including a controversial tape, while Clinton's campaign was undermined by declining approval ratings[13] due to concerns about her ethics and trustworthiness,[14] and an FBI investigation of her improper use of a private email server, which received more media coverage than any other topic during the campaign.[15][16]

Clinton led in nearly every pre-election nationwide poll and in most swing state polls, leading some commentators to compare Trump's victory to that of Harry S. Truman in 1948 as one of the greatest political upsets in modern U.S. history.[17][18] While Clinton received 2.87 million more votes than Trump did (the largest margin ever for a losing presidential candidate),[19] Trump received the majority in the Electoral College and won upset victories in the pivotal Rust Belt region. Trump won six states that Democrat Barack Obama had won in 2012: Florida, Iowa, Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.[20] Ultimately, Trump received 304 electoral votes and Clinton 227, as two faithless electors defected from Trump and five defected from Clinton. Trump is the fifth person in U.S. history to become president while losing the nationwide popular vote.[lower-alpha 2] He is the first president with neither prior public service nor military experience, and the oldest person to be inaugurated for a first presidential term.

The United States government's intelligence agencies concluded on January 6, 2017, that the Russian government had interfered in the 2016 elections[22][23][24] in order to "undermine public faith in the U.S. democratic process, denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency".[25] A Special Counsel investigation of alleged collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign began in May 2017[26][27] and ended in March 2019. The investigation concluded that Russian interference to favor Trump's candidacy occurred "in sweeping and systematic fashion", but "did not establish that members of the Trump campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government".[28]

Background

Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

The incumbent in 2016, Barack Obama. His second term expired at noon on January 20, 2017.

Article Two of the United States Constitution provides that the President and Vice President of the United States must be natural-born citizens of the United States, at least 35 years old, and residents of the United States for a period of at least 14 years. Candidates for the presidency typically seek the nomination of one of the political parties, in which case each party devises a method (such as a primary election) to choose the candidate the party deems best suited to run for the position. Traditionally, the primary elections are indirect elections where voters cast ballots for a slate of party delegates pledged to a particular candidate. The party's delegates then officially nominate a candidate to run on the party's behalf. The general election in November is also an indirect election, where voters cast ballots for a slate of members of the Electoral College; these electors in turn directly elect the president and vice president.

President Barack Obama, a Democrat and former U.S. Senator from Illinois, was ineligible to seek reelection to a third term due to the restrictions of the Twenty-second Amendment; in accordance with Section 1 of the Twentieth Amendment, his term expired at noon eastern standard time on January 20, 2017.

Primary process

The series of presidential primary elections and caucuses took place between February and June 2016, staggered among the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and U.S. territories. This nominating process was also an indirect election, where voters cast ballots for a slate of delegates to a political party's nominating convention, who in turn elected their party's presidential nominee.

Speculation about the 2016 campaign began almost immediately following the 2012 campaign, with New York magazine declaring that the race had begun in an article published on November 8, two days after the 2012 election.[29] On the same day, Politico released an article predicting that the 2016 general election would be between Clinton and former Florida Governor Jeb Bush, while a New York Times article named New Jersey Governor Chris Christie and Senator Cory Booker from New Jersey as potential candidates.[30][31]

Nominations

Republican Party

Primaries

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

With seventeen major candidates entering the race, starting with Ted Cruz on March 23, 2015, this was the largest presidential primary field for any political party in American history.[32]

Prior to the Iowa caucuses on February 1, 2016, Perry, Walker, Jindal, Graham, and Pataki withdrew due to low polling numbers. Despite leading many polls in Iowa, Trump came in second to Cruz, after which Huckabee, Paul, and Santorum withdrew due to poor performances at the ballot box. Following a sizable victory for Trump in the New Hampshire primary, Christie, Fiorina, and Gilmore abandoned the race. Bush followed suit after scoring fourth place to Trump, Rubio, and Cruz in South Carolina. On March 1, 2016, the first of four "Super Tuesday" primaries, Rubio won his first contest in Minnesota, Cruz won Alaska, Oklahoma, and his home of Texas, and Trump won the other seven states that voted. Failing to gain traction, Carson suspended his campaign a few days later.[33] On March 15, 2016, the second "Super Tuesday", Kasich won his only contest in his home state of Ohio, and Trump won five primaries including Florida. Rubio suspended his campaign after losing his home state.[34]

Between March 16 and May 3, 2016, only three candidates remained in the race: Trump, Cruz, and Kasich. Cruz won the most delegates in four Western contests and in Wisconsin, keeping a credible path to denying Trump the nomination on the first ballot with 1,237 delegates. Trump then augmented his lead by scoring landslide victories in New York and five Northeastern states in April, followed by a decisive victory in Indiana on May 3, 2016, securing all 57 of the state's delegates. Without any further chances of forcing a contested convention, both Cruz[35] and Kasich[36] suspended their campaigns. Trump remained the only active candidate and was declared the presumptive Republican nominee by Republican National Committee chairman Reince Priebus on the evening of May 3, 2016.[37]

A 2018 study found that media coverage of Trump led to increased public support for him during the primaries. The study showed that Trump received nearly $2 billion in free media, more than double any other candidate. Political scientist John Sides argued that Trump's polling surge was "almost certainly" due to frequent media coverage of his campaign. Sides concluded "Trump is surging in the polls because the news media has consistently focused on him since he announced his candidacy on June 16".[38] Prior to clinching the Republican nomination, Trump received little support from establishment Republicans.[39]

Nominees

Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

Republican Party (United States)
2016 Republican Party ticket
Donald Trump Mike Pence
for President for Vice President
Official Portrait of President Donald Trump.jpg
Chairman of
The Trump Organization
(1971–2017)
50th
Governor of Indiana
(2013–2017)
Campaign
Trump-Pence 2016.svg
[40][41][42]

Candidates

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

Major candidates were determined by the various media based on common consensus. The following were invited to sanctioned televised debates based on their poll ratings.

Trump received 14,010,177 total votes in the primary. Trump, Cruz, Rubio and Kasich each won at least one primary, with Trump receiving the highest number of votes and Ted Cruz receiving the second highest.

Candidates in this section are sorted by reverse date of withdrawal from the primaries
John Kasich Ted Cruz Marco Rubio Ben Carson Jeb Bush Jim Gilmore Carly Fiorina Chris Christie
Marco Rubio, Official Portrait, 112th Congress.jpg
Ben Carson by Skidmore with lighting correction.jpg
Jeb Bush Feb 2015.jpg
Carly Fiorina NFRW 2015.jpg
69th
Governor of Ohio
(2011–2019)
U.S. Senator
from Texas
(2013–present)
U.S. Senator
from Florida
(2011–present)
Dir. of Pediatric Neurosurgery,
Johns Hopkins Hospital
(1984–2013)
43rd
Governor of Florida
(1999–2007)
68th
Governor of Virginia
(1998–2002)
CEO of
Hewlett-Packard
(1999–2005)
55th
Governor of New Jersey
(2010–2018)
Campaign Campaign Campaign Campaign Campaign Campaign Campaign Campaign
W: May 4
4,287,479 votes
W: May 3
7,811,110 votes
W: Mar 15
3,514,124 votes
W: Mar 4
857,009 votes
W: Feb 20
286,634 votes
W: Feb 12
18,364 votes
W: Feb 10
40,577 votes
W: Feb 10
57,634 votes
[43] [44][45][46] [47][48][49] [50][51][52] [53][54] [55][56] [57][58] [59][60]
Rand Paul Rick Santorum Mike Huckabee George Pataki Lindsey Graham Bobby Jindal Scott Walker Rick Perry
Rick Santorum by Gage Skidmore 8 (cropped2).jpg
Mike Huckabee by Gage Skidmore 6 (cropped).jpg
U.S. Senator
from Kentucky
(2011–present)
U.S. Senator
from Pennsylvania
(1995–2007)
44th
Governor of Arkansas
(1996–2007)
53rd
Governor of New York
(1995–2006)
U.S. Senator
from South Carolina
(2003–present)
55th
Governor of Louisiana
(2008–2016)
45th
Governor of Wisconsin
(2011–2019)
47th
Governor of Texas
(2000–2015)
Campaign Campaign Campaign Campaign Campaign Campaign Campaign Campaign
W: Feb 3
66,781 votes
W: Feb 3
16,622 votes
W: Feb 1
51,436 votes
W: December 29, 2015
2,036 votes
W: December 21, 2015
5,666 votes
W: November 17, 2015
222 votes
W: September 21, 2015
1 write-in vote in New Hampshire
W: September 11, 2015
1 write-in vote in New Hampshire
[61][62][63] [64][65] [66][67] [68] [69][70] [71][72] [73][74][75] [75][76][77]

Vice presidential selection

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

Trump turned his attention towards selecting a running mate after he became the presumptive nominee on May 4, 2016.[78] In mid-June, Eli Stokols and Burgess Everett of Politico reported that the Trump campaign was considering New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich from Georgia, Senator Jeff Sessions of Alabama, and Oklahoma Governor Mary Fallin.[79] A June 30 report from The Washington Post also included Senators Bob Corker from Tennessee, Richard Burr from North Carolina, Tom Cotton from Arkansas, Joni Ernst from Iowa, and Indiana Governor Mike Pence as individuals still being considered for the ticket.[80] Trump also said he was considering two military generals for the position, including retired Lieutenant General Michael Flynn.[81]

In July 2016, it was reported that Trump had narrowed his list of possible running mates down to three: Christie, Gingrich, and Pence.[82]

On July 14, 2016, several major media outlets reported that Trump had selected Pence as his running mate. Trump confirmed these reports in a message Twitter on July 15, 2016, and formally made the announcement the following day in New York.[83][84] On July 19, the second night of the 2016 Republican National Convention, Pence won the Republican vice presidential nomination by acclamation.[85]

Democratic Party

Primaries

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

Former secretary of state Hillary Clinton, who also served in the U.S. Senate and was the First Lady of the United States, became the first Democrat in the field to formally launch a major candidacy for the presidency with an announcement on April 12, 2015, via a video message.[86] While nationwide opinion polls in 2015 indicated that Clinton was the front-runner for the 2016 Democratic presidential nomination, she faced strong challenges from Independent Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont,[87] who became the second major candidate when he formally announced on April 30, 2015, that he was running for the Democratic nomination.[88] September 2015 polling numbers indicated a narrowing gap between Clinton and Sanders.[87][89][90] On May 30, 2015, former Governor of Maryland Martin O'Malley was the third major candidate to enter the Democratic primary race,[91] followed by former independent governor and Republican senator of Rhode Island Lincoln Chafee on June 3, 2015,[92][93] former Virginia Senator Jim Webb on July 2, 2015,[94] and former Harvard law professor Lawrence Lessig on September 6, 2015.[95]

On October 20, 2015, Webb announced his withdrawal from the primaries, and explored a potential Independent run.[96] The next day Vice-President Joe Biden decided not to run, ending months of speculation, stating, "While I will not be a candidate, I will not be silent."[97][98] On October 23, Chafee withdrew, stating that he hoped for "an end to the endless wars and the beginning of a new era for the United States and humanity".[99] On November 2, after failing to qualify for the second DNC-sanctioned debate after adoption of a rule change negated polls which before might have necessitated his inclusion in the debate, Lessig withdrew as well, narrowing the field to Clinton, O'Malley, and Sanders.[100]

On February 1, 2016, in an extremely close contest, Clinton won the Iowa caucuses by a margin of 0.2 points over Sanders. After winning no delegates in Iowa, O'Malley withdrew from the presidential race that day. On February 9, Sanders bounced back to win the New Hampshire primary with 60% of the vote. In the remaining two February contests, Clinton won the Nevada caucuses with 53% of the vote and scored a decisive victory in the South Carolina primary with 73% of the vote.[101][102] On March 1, 11 states participated in the first of four "Super Tuesday" primaries. Clinton won Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Massachusetts, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia and 504 pledged delegates, while Sanders won Colorado, Minnesota, Oklahoma, and his home state of Vermont and 340 delegates. The following weekend, Sanders won victories in Kansas, Nebraska, and Maine with 15- to 30-point margins, while Clinton won the Louisiana primary with 71% of the vote. On March 8, despite never having a lead in the Michigan primary, Sanders won by a small margin of 1.5 points and outperforming polls by over 19 points, while Clinton won 83% of the vote in Mississippi.[103] On March 15, the second "Super Tuesday", Clinton won in Florida, Illinois, Missouri, North Carolina, and Ohio. Between March 22 and April 9, Sanders won six caucuses in Idaho, Utah, Alaska, Hawaii, Washington, and Wyoming, as well as the Wisconsin primary, while Clinton won the Arizona primary. On April 19, Clinton won the New York primary with 58% of the vote. On April 26, in the third "Super Tuesday" dubbed the "Acela primary", she won contests in Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, and Pennsylvania, while Sanders won in Rhode Island. Over the course of May, Sanders accomplished another surprise win in the Indiana primary[104] and also won in West Virginia and Oregon, while Clinton won the Guam caucus and Kentucky primary (and also non-binding primaries in Nebraska and Washington).

On June 4 and 5, Clinton won two victories in the Virgin Islands caucus and Puerto Rico primary. On June 6, 2016, the Associated Press and NBC News reported that Clinton had become the presumptive nominee after reaching the required number of delegates, including pledged delegates and superdelegates, to secure the nomination, becoming the first woman to ever clinch the presidential nomination of a major U.S. political party.[105] On June 7, Clinton secured a majority of pledged delegates after winning primaries in California, New Jersey, New Mexico, and South Dakota, while Sanders won only Montana and North Dakota. Clinton also won the final primary in the District of Columbia on June 14. At the conclusion of the primary process, Clinton had won 2,204 pledged delegates (54% of the total) awarded by the primary elections and caucuses, while Sanders had won 1,847 (46%). Out of the 714 unpledged delegates or "superdelegates" who were set to vote in the convention in July, Clinton received endorsements from 560 (78%), while Sanders received 47 (7%).[106]

Although Sanders had not formally dropped out of the race, he announced on June 16, 2016, that his main goal in the coming months would be to work with Clinton to defeat Trump in the general election.[107] On July 8, appointees from the Clinton campaign, the Sanders campaign, and the Democratic National Committee negotiated a draft of the party's platform.[108] On July 12, Sanders formally endorsed Clinton at a rally in New Hampshire in which he appeared with her.[109]

Nominees

Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

Democratic Party (United States)
2016 Democratic Party ticket
Hillary Clinton Tim Kaine
for President for Vice President
Hillary Clinton by Gage Skidmore 2.jpg
Tim Kaine, official 113th Congress photo portrait.jpg
67th
U.S. Secretary of State
(2009–2013)
U.S. Senator
from Virginia
(2013–present)
Campaign
[110][111][112]

Candidates

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

The following candidates were frequently interviewed by major broadcast networks and cable news channels or were listed in publicly published national polls. Lessig was invited to one forum, but withdrew when rules were changed which prevented him from participating in officially sanctioned debates.

Clinton received 16,849,779 votes in the primary.

Candidates in this section are sorted by date of withdrawal from the primaries
Bernie Sanders Martin O'Malley Lawrence Lessig Lincoln Chafee Jim Webb
Bernie Sanders September 2015 cropped.jpg
Governor O'Malley Portrait.jpg
Lessig (cropped).png
Jim Webb official 110th Congress photo (cropped).jpg
U.S. Senator from Vermont (2007–present) 61st
Governor of Maryland
(2007–2015)
Harvard Law professor
(2009–2016)
74th
Governor of Rhode Island
(2011–2015)
U.S. Senator
from Virginia
(2007–2013)
Campaign Campaign Campaign Campaign Campaign
LN: July 26, 2016
13,167,848 votes
W: February 1, 2016
110,423 votes
W: November 2, 2015
4 write-in votes in New Hampshire
W: October 23, 2015
0 votes
W: October 20, 2015
2 write-in votes in New Hampshire
[113] [114][115] [100] [116] [117]

Vice presidential selection

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

In April 2016, the Clinton campaign began to compile a list of 15 to 20 individuals to vet for the position of running mate, even though Sanders continued to challenge Clinton in the Democratic primaries.[118] In mid-June, The Wall Street Journal reported that Clinton's shortlist included Representative Xavier Becerra from California, Senator Cory Booker from New Jersey, Senator Sherrod Brown from Ohio, Housing and Urban Development Secretary Julián Castro from Texas, Mayor of Los Angeles Eric Garcetti from California, Senator Tim Kaine from Virginia, Labor Secretary Tom Perez from Maryland, Representative Tim Ryan from Ohio, and Senator Elizabeth Warren from Massachusetts.[119] Subsequent reports stated that Clinton was also considering Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack, retired Admiral James Stavridis, and Governor John Hickenlooper of Colorado.[120] In discussing her potential vice presidential choice, Clinton said the most important attribute she looked for was the ability and experience to immediately step into the role of president.[120]

On July 22, Clinton announced that she had chosen Senator Tim Kaine from Virginia as her running mate.[121] The delegates at the 2016 Democratic National Convention, which took place July 25–28, formally nominated the Democratic ticket.

Third parties and independents

File:Stein, Johnson signs 2016.jpg
Campaign signs of third-party candidates Jill Stein and Gary Johnson, October 2016 in St. Johnsbury, Vermont

Third party and independent candidates who have obtained more than 100,000 votes nationally or on Ballot in at least 15 states are listed separately.

Libertarian Party

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

Additional Party Endorsements: Independence Party of New York

Ballot access to all 538 electoral votes

Nominees

2016 Libertarian Party ticket
Gary Johnson Bill Weld
for President for Vice President
29th
Governor of New Mexico
(1995–2003)
68th
Governor of Massachusetts
(1991–1997)
Campaign
Johnson Weld 2016.svg
[122][123]

Green Party

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

Ballot access to 480 electoral votes (522 with write-in):[124] map

  • As write-in: Georgia, Indiana, North Carolina[125][126]
  • Ballot access lawsuit pending: Oklahoma[127]
  • No ballot access: Nevada, South Dakota[125][128]

Nominees

Green Party of the United States New Logo.png
2016 Green Party ticket
Jill Stein Ajamu Baraka
for President for Vice President
Jill Stein by Gage Skidmore.jpg
Physician
from Lexington, Massachusetts
Activist
from Washington, DC
Campaign
[129][130]

Constitution Party

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

Ballot access to 207 electoral votes (451 with write-in):[131][132] map

  • As write-in: Alabama, Arizona, Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New York, Ohio, Oregon, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Virginia[131][133][134][135][136]
  • No ballot access: California, District of Columbia, Massachusetts, North Carolina, Oklahoma[131]

Nominees

2016 Constitution Party ticket
Darrell Castle Scott Bradley
for President for Vice President
DCastle08.jpg
Attorney
from Memphis, Tennessee
Businessman
from Utah
Campaign
File:Castle 2016 logo, flat.png
[137]

Independent

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

Additional Party Endorsement: Independence Party of Minnesota, South Carolina Independence Party

Ballot access to 84 electoral votes (451 with write-in):[138] map

  • As write-in: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Illinois, Kansas, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin[138][139][140][141][142][143][144]
  • No ballot access: District of Columbia, Florida, Hawaii, Indiana, Mississippi, Nevada, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Wyoming

In some states, Evan McMullin's running mate was listed as Nathan Johnson on the ballot rather than Mindy Finn, although Nathan Johnson was intended to only be a placeholder until an actual running mate was chosen.[145]

2016 Independent ticket
Evan McMullin Mindy Finn
for President for Vice President
Evan McMullin 2016-10-21 headshot.jpg
Chief policy director for the
House Republican Conference (2015–2016)
President of
Empowered Women
(2015–present)
Campaign
EvanMcMullinMindyFinn2016.png
[146]

Other nominations

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

Party Presidential nominee Vice presidential nominee Attainable Electors
(write-in)
Popular Vote States with ballot access
(write-in)
Party for Socialism and Liberation

Peace and Freedom[147]
Liberty Union Party[148]

Gloria La Riva
Newspaper printer and activist from California
Eugene Puryear
Activist from Washington, DC
112
(226)
map
74,402
(0.05%)
California, Colorado, Iowa, Louisiana, New Jersey, New Mexico, Vermont, Washington[149][150]
(Alabama, Connecticut, Delaware, Kansas, Maryland, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, West Virginia)[140][141][143][135][151][152][153][154][155]
Socialist Workers Party Alyson Kennedy
Mineworker and Labor Leader from Illinois
Osborne Hart
of Pennsylvania
70
(123)
map
12,465
(0.01%)
Colorado, Louisiana, Minnesota, New Jersey, Tennessee, Utah, Washington[149]
(Alabama, Iowa, New Hampshire, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont)[151][153]
Workers World Party Monica Moorehead
perennial candidate and political activist from Alabama[156]
Lamont Lilly
of North Carolina[157]
30
(235)
map
4,319
(0.00%)
New Jersey, Utah, Wisconsin[149]
(Alabama, Indiana, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Massachusetts, Michigan, Montana, New Hampshire, New, York, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Texas, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia)[141][143][151][158][159][154][160][161][162][163][164][165]
Socialist Party USA

Natural Law Party[166]

Mimi Soltysik
former National Co-Chair of the Socialist Party USA from California[167]
Campaign
Angela Nicole Walker
of Wisconsin
25
(209)
map
2,704
(0.00%)
Colorado, Michigan, Guam[149][150][168]
(Alabama, Indiana, Iowa, Maryland, Minnesota, Montana, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Wisconsin)[143][135][151][158][153][159][155][163][165][169][170]
Prohibition Party James Hedges
former Tax Assessor for Thompson Township, Fulton County, Pennsylvania[171][172]
Bill Bayes
of Mississippi[171]
21
(116)
map
5,617
(0.00%)
Arkansas, Colorado, Mississippi[149]
(Alabama, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Maryland, Montana, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia)[141][135][151][153][154][160][163]
Independent Mike Smith
Lawyer, Colorado
Daniel White 20
(222)
9,345
(0.01%)
Colorado, Tennessee[149]
(Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Minnesota, Montana, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington. West Virginia)[140][141][133][135][136][151][152][153][159][154][155][160][163][164][169][173][174]
Independent Richard Duncan
Real Estate Agent from Ohio
Ricky Johnson
Preacher from Pennsylvania
18
(173)
24,307
(0.02%)
Ohio[175]
(Alabama, Alaska, Delaware, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Maryland, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia)[135][151][152][158][176][153][154][150][155][160][163][173][174]
Independent Laurence Kotlikoff
Economics Professor at Boston University, Massachusetts
Edward E. Leamer
Economics Professor at UCLA, California
17
(428)
map
3,596
(0.00%)
Colorado, Louisiana[149]
(Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, California, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, New Hampshire, New Jersey, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin)[139][140][142][144][133][135][136][151][158][153][159][154][150][155][160][161][162][163][164][165][169][170][173][174][177][178][179][180]
America's Party Tom Hoefling
activist from Iowa[181]
Steve Schulin
of South Carolina
17
(369)
map
4,845
(0.00%)
Colorado, Louisiana[149][182]
(Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin)[140][141][142][143][133][134][135][136][151][152][158][176][153][159][154][155][160][162][163][164][165][169][170][173][174][178][180]
Veterans Party of America Chris Keniston
reliability engineer from Texas[183]
Deacon Taylor
of Nevada[184]
17
(196)
map
7,248
(0.01%)
Colorado, Louisiana[149]
(Alabama, Alaska, Idaho, Iowa, Kentucky, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin)[143][136][151][176][153][159][155][160][164][170][173][174]
Legal Marijuana Now Party Dan Vacek
of Minnesota
Mark Elworth Jr.
of Nebraska
16
(77)
13,537
(0.01%)
Iowa, Minnesota[149]
(Alabama, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont)[151][153]
Independent Lynn Kahn
Doctor of Clinical Psychology from Maryland
Kathleen Monahan
of Florida
12
(160)
5,730
(0.00%)
Arkansas, Iowa[185][149]
(Alabama, Delaware, Idaho, Kansas, Maryland, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia)[141][143][135][151][152][176][153][159][154][155][160][163]
American Solidarity Party Mike Maturen
sales professional and magician from Michigan
Juan Muñoz
of Texas
9
(332)
map
6,714
(0.00%)
Colorado[186]
(Alabama, Alaska, California, Georgia, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin)[139][141][143][144][134][135][136][151][176][153][159][155][160][162][164][165][170][173][174]
Independent Joseph Allen Maldonado
of Oklahoma
Douglas K. Terranova 9
(212)
961
(0.00%)
Colorado[186]
(Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Maryland, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin)[140][133][135][151][152][158][176][153][159][154][155][163][164][170][173][174][178]
Independent Ryan Alan Scott Bruce Kendall Barnard 9
(108)
749
(0.00%)
Colorado[186]
(Alabama, Delaware, Iowa, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont)[143][151][152][153]
American Party (South Carolina) Peter Skewes
Animal Science Professor at Clemson University, South Carolina
Michael Lacy 9
(83)
3,246
(0.00%)
South Carolina[187]
(Alabama, Connecticut, Iowa, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont)[140][151][153]
Approval Voting Party Frank Atwood
of Colorado
Blake Huber
of Colorado
9
(76)
337
(0.00%)
Colorado[186]
(Alabama, Iowa, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont)[151][153]
Independent American Party Kyle Kenley Kopitke
of Michigan
Narthan R. Sorenson 9
(76)
1,096
(0.00%)
Colorado[186]
(Alabama, Iowa, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont)[151][153]
Nutrition Party Rod Silva
restaurateur from New Jersey[188][189]
Richard Silva 9
(76)
751
(0.00%)
Colorado[186]
(Alabama, Iowa, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont)[151][153]
United States Pacifist Party Bradford Lyttle
peace activist from Illinois
Hannah Walsh 9
(76)
382
(0.00%)
Colorado[186]
(Alabama, Iowa, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont)[151][153]
Socialist Equality Party Jerry White
peace activist from Michigan
Niles Niemuth
journalist from Wisconsin
8
(166)
481
(0.00%)
Louisiana[190]
(Alabama, California, Delaware, Iowa, Kentucky, Maryland, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia)[139][135][151][152][153][154][155][174]
Independent Princess Khadijah Jacob-Fambro
of California
Milton Fambro
of California
8
(75)
749
(0.00%)
Louisiana[190]
(Alabama, Iowa, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont)[151][153]
Independent American Party Rocky Giordani
from California
Farley Anderson
activist from Utah
6
(79)
2,752
(0.00%)
Utah[169]
(Alabama, Iowa, Kansas, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont)[141][151][153]
Constitution Party of Idaho Scott Copeland
of Texas
J.R. Meyers 4
(71)
2,356
(0.00%)
Idaho[191]
(Alabama, Iowa, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont)[151][153]

General election campaign

File:2016 Presidential Election ballot.jpg
A general election ballot, listing the presidential and vice presidential candidates

Hillary Clinton focused her candidacy on several themes, including raising middle class incomes, expanding women's rights, instituting campaign finance reform, and improving the Affordable Care Act. In March 2016, she laid out a detailed economic plan basing her economic philosophy on inclusive capitalism, which proposed a "clawback" that rescinds tax relief and other benefits for companies that move jobs overseas; with provision of incentives for companies that share profits with employees, communities and the environment, rather than focusing on short-term profits to increase stock value and rewarding shareholders; as well as increasing collective bargaining rights; and placing an "exit tax" on companies that move their headquarters out of the U.S. in order to pay a lower tax rate overseas.[192] Clinton promoted equal pay for equal work to address current alleged shortfalls in how much women are paid to do the same jobs men do,[193] promoted explicitly focus on family issues and support of universal preschool,[194] expressed support for the right to same-sex marriage,[194] and proposed allowing undocumented immigrants to have a path to citizenship stating that it "[i]s at its heart a family issue".[195]

Donald Trump's campaign drew heavily on his personal image, enhanced by his previous media exposure.[196] The primary slogan of the Trump campaign, extensively used on campaign merchandise, was Make America Great Again. The red baseball cap with the slogan emblazoned on the front became a symbol of the campaign and has been frequently donned by Trump and his supporters.[197] Trump's right-wing populist positions—reported by The New Yorker to be nativist, protectionist, and semi-isolationist—differ in many ways from traditional conservatism.[198] He opposed many free trade deals and military interventionist policies that conservatives generally support, and opposed cuts in Medicare and Social Security benefits. Moreover, he has insisted that Washington is "broken" and can be fixed only by an outsider.[199][200][201] Support for Trump was high among working and middle-class white male voters with annual incomes of less than $50,000 and no college degree.[202] This group, particularly those with less than a high-school education, suffered a decline in their income in recent years.[203] According to The Washington Post, support for Trump is higher in areas with a higher mortality rate for middle-aged white people.[204] A sample of interviews with more than 11,000 Republican-leaning respondents from August to December 2015 found that Trump at that time found his strongest support among Republicans in West Virginia, followed by New York, and then followed by six Southern states.[205]

Clinton had an uneasy—and, at times, adversarial—relationship with the press throughout her life in public service.[206] Weeks before her official entry as a presidential candidate, Clinton attended a political press corps event, pledging to start fresh on what she described as a "complicated" relationship with political reporters.[207] Clinton was initially criticized by the press for avoiding taking their questions,[208][209] after which she provided more interviews.

In contrast, Trump benefited from free media more than any other candidate. From the beginning of his campaign through February 2016, Trump received almost $2 billion in free media attention, twice the amount that Clinton received.[210] According to data from the Tyndall Report, which tracks nightly news content, through February 2016, Trump alone accounted for more than a quarter of all 2016 election coverage on the evening newscasts of NBC, CBS and ABC, more than all the Democratic campaigns combined.[211][212][213] Observers noted Trump's ability to garner constant mainstream media coverage "almost at will".[214] However, Trump frequently criticized the media for writing what he alleged to be false stories about him[215] and he has called upon his supporters to be "the silent majority".[216] Trump also said the media "put false meaning into the words I say", and says he does not mind being criticized by the media as long as they are honest about it.[217][218]

Both Clinton and Trump were seen unfavorably by the general public, and their controversial nature set the tone of the campaign.[219]

Clinton's practice during her time as Secretary of State of using a private email address and server, in lieu of State Department servers, gained widespread public attention back in March 2015.[220] Concerns were raised about security and preservation of emails, and the possibility that laws may have been violated.[221] After allegations were raised that some of the emails in question fell into this so-called "born classified" category, an FBI probe was initiated regarding how classified information was handled on the Clinton server.[222][223][224][225] The FBI probe was concluded on July 5, 2016, with a recommendation of no charges, a recommendation that was followed by the Justice Department.

Also, on September 9, 2016, Clinton said: "You know, just to be grossly generalistic, you could put half of Trump's supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables. They're racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic—you name it."[226] Donald Trump criticized her remark as insulting his supporters.[227][228] The following day Clinton expressed regret for saying "half", while insisting that Trump had deplorably amplified "hateful views and voices".[229] Previously on August 25, 2016, Clinton gave a speech criticizing Trump's campaign for using "racist lies" and allowing the alt-right to gain prominence.[230]

On September 11, 2016, Clinton left a 9/11 memorial event early due to illness.[231] Video footage of Clinton's departure showed Clinton becoming unsteady on her feet and being helped into a van.[232] Later that evening, Clinton reassured reporters that she was "feeling great".[233] After initially stating that Clinton had become overheated at the event, her campaign later added that she had been diagnosed with pneumonia two days earlier.[232] The media criticized the Clinton campaign for a lack of transparency regarding Clinton's illness.[232] Clinton cancelled a planned trip to California due to her illness. The episode drew renewed public attention to questions about Clinton's health.[233]

On the other side, on October 7, 2016, video and accompanying audio were released by The Washington Post in which Trump referred obscenely to women in a 2005 conversation with Billy Bush while they were preparing to film an episode of Access Hollywood. In the recording, Trump described his attempts to initiate a sexual relationship with a married woman and added that women would allow male celebrities to grope their genitalia (Trump used the phrase "grab 'em by the pussy"). The audio was met with a reaction of disbelief and disgust from the media.[234][235][236] Following the revelation, Trump's campaign issued an apology, stating that the video was of a private conversation from "many years ago".[237] The incident was condemned by numerous prominent Republicans like Reince Priebus, Mitt Romney, John Kasich, Jeb Bush[238] and the Speaker of the House Paul Ryan.[239] By October 8, several dozen Republicans had called for Trump to withdraw from the campaign and let Pence head the ticket.[240] Trump insisted he would never drop out.[241] Trump apologized for the remarks.[242]

The ongoing controversy of the election made third parties attract voters' attention. On March 3, 2016, Libertarian Gary Johnson addressed the Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington DC, touting himself as the third-party option for anti-Trump Republicans.[243][244] In early May, some commentators opined that Johnson was moderate enough to pull votes away from both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump who were very disliked and polarizing.[245] Both conservative and liberal media noted that Johnson could get votes from "Never Trump" Republicans and disaffected Bernie Sanders supporters.[246] Johnson also began to get time on national television, being invited on ABC News, NBC News, CBS News, CNN, Fox News, MSNBC, Bloomberg, and many other networks.[247] In September and October 2016, Johnson suffered a "string of damaging stumbles when he has fielded questions about foreign affairs".[248][249] On September 8, Johnson, when he appeared on MSNBC's Morning Joe, was asked by panelist Mike Barnicle, "What would you do, if you were elected, about Aleppo?" (referring to a war-torn city in Syria). Johnson responded, "And what is Aleppo?"[250] His response prompted widespread attention, much of it negative.[250][251] Later that day, Johnson said that he had "blanked" and that he did "understand the dynamics of the Syrian conflict—I talk about them every day."[251]

On the other hand, Green Party candidate Jill Stein said the Democratic and Republican parties are "two corporate parties" that have converged into one.[252] Concerned by the rise of the far right internationally and the tendency towards neoliberalism within the Democratic Party, she has said, "The answer to neofascism is stopping neoliberalism. Putting another Clinton in the White House will fan the flames of this right-wing extremism."[253][254]

In response to Johnson's growing poll numbers, the Clinton campaign and Democratic allies increased their criticism of Johnson in September 2016, warning that "a vote for a third party is a vote for Donald Trump" and deploying Senator Bernie Sanders (Clinton's former primary rival, who supported her in the general election) to win over voters who might be considering voting for Johnson or for Stein.[255]

On October 28, eleven days before the election, FBI Director James Comey informed Congress that the FBI was analyzing additional Clinton emails obtained during its investigation of an unrelated case.[256][257] On November 6, he notified Congress that the new emails did not change the FBI's earlier conclusion.[258][259]

Ballot access

Presidential ticket Party Ballot access Votes[260][261] Percentage
States Electors % of voters
Trump / Pence Republican 50 + DC 538 100% 62,984,828 46.09%
Clinton / Kaine Democratic 50 + DC 538 100% 65,853,514 48.18%
Johnson / Weld Libertarian 50 + DC 538 100% 4,489,341 3.28%
Stein / Baraka Green 44 + DC 480 89% 1,457,218 1.07%
McMullin / Finn Independent 11 84 15% 731,991 0.54%
Castle / Bradley Constitution 24 207 39% 203,090 0.15%
  • Candidates in bold were on ballots representing 270 electoral votes, without needing write-in states.
  • All other candidates were on the ballots of fewer than 25 states, but had write-in access greater than 270.

Party conventions

Map of United States showing Philadelphia, Cleveland, Orlando, and Houston
Philadelphia
Philadelphia
Cleveland
Cleveland
Orlando
Orlando
Houston
Houston
Salt Lake City
Salt Lake City
  Democratic Party
  Republican Party
  Libertarian Party
  Green Party
  Constitution Party
Democratic Party

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

  • July 25–28, 2016: Democratic National Convention was held in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.[262]
Republican Party

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

Libertarian Party

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

  • May 26–30, 2016: Libertarian National Convention was held in Orlando, Florida.[265][266]
Green Party

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

  • August 4–7, 2016: Green National Convention was held in Houston, Texas.[267][268]
Constitution Party

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

  • April 13–16, 2016: Constitution Party National Convention was held in Salt Lake City, Utah.[269]

Campaign finance

This is an overview of the money used in the campaign as it is reported to Federal Election Commission (FEC) and released in September 2016. Outside groups are independent expenditure-only committees—also called PACs and SuperPACs. The sources of the numbers are the FEC and Center for Responsive Politics.[270] Some spending totals are not available, due to withdrawals before the FEC deadline. As of September 2016, ten candidates with ballot access have filed financial reports with the FEC.

Candidate Campaign committee (as of December 9) Outside groups (as of December 9) Total spent
Money raised Money spent Cash on hand Debt Money raised Money spent Cash on hand
Hillary Clinton[271][272] $497,808,791 $435,367,811 $62,440,979 $111,238 $205,909,959 $204,267,754 $1,642,205 $639,635,565
Donald Trump[273][274] $247,541,449 $231,546,996 $15,994,454 $2,086,572 $74,905,285 $70,941,922 $3,963,363 $302,488,918
Gary Johnson[275][276] $11,410,313 $10,308,873 $1,101,440 $0 $1,386,554 $1,310,578 $75,976 $11,619,451
Rocky De La Fuente[277] $8,075,959 $8,074,913 $1,046 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,074,913
Jill Stein[278][279] $3,509,477 $3,451,174 $58,303 $87,740 $0 $0 $0 $3,451,174
Evan McMullin[280] $1,644,102 $1,642,165 $1,937 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,642,165
Darrell Castle[281] $52,234 $51,365 $869 $2,500 $0 $0 $0 $51,365
Gloria La Riva[282] $29,243 $24,207 $5,034 $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,207
Monica Moorehead[283] $11,547 $9,127 $2,419 $4,500 $0 $0 $0 $9,127
Peter Skewes[284] $7,966 $4,238 $7,454 $8,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,238

Voting rights

The 2016 presidential election was the first in 50 years without all the protections of the original Voting Rights Act.[285] Fourteen states had new voting restrictions in place, including swing states such as Virginia and Wisconsin.[286][287][288][289][290]

Newspaper endorsements

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

Clinton was endorsed by The New York Times,[291] the Los Angeles Times,[292] the Houston Chronicle,[293] the San Jose Mercury News,[294] the Chicago Sun-Times[295] and the New York Daily News[296] editorial boards. Trump, who has frequently criticized the mainstream media, was not endorsed by the vast majority of newspapers,[297][298] with the Las Vegas Review-Journal,[299] The Florida Times-Union,[300] and the tabloid National Enquirer his highest profile supporters.[301] Several papers which endorsed Clinton, such as the Houston Chronicle,[293] The Dallas Morning News,[302] The San Diego Union-Tribune,[303] The Columbus Dispatch[304] and The Arizona Republic,[305] endorsed their first Democratic candidate for many decades. USA Today, which had not endorsed any candidate since it was founded in 1982, broke tradition by giving an anti-endorsement against Trump, declaring him "unfit for the presidency".[306][307] The Atlantic, which has been in circulation since 1857, gave Clinton its third-ever endorsement (after Abraham Lincoln and Lyndon Johnson).[308]

Other traditionally Republican papers, including the New Hampshire Union Leader, which had endorsed the Republican nominee in every election for the last 100 years,[309] The Detroit News, which had not endorsed a non-Republican in its 143 years,[310] and the Chicago Tribune,[311] endorsed Gary Johnson.

Involvement of other countries

Russian involvement

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

On December 9, 2016, the Central Intelligence Agency issued an assessment to lawmakers in the US Senate, stating that a Russian entity hacked the DNC and John Podesta's emails to assist Donald Trump. The Federal Bureau of Investigation agreed.[312] President Barack Obama ordered a "full review" into such possible intervention.[313] Director of National Intelligence James R. Clapper in early January 2017 testified before a Senate committee that Russia's meddling in the 2016 presidential campaign went beyond hacking, and included disinformation and the dissemination of fake news, often promoted on social media.[314]

President-elect Trump originally called the report fabricated,[315] and Wikileaks denied any involvement by Russian authorities.[316] Days later, Trump said he could be convinced of the Russian hacking "if there is a unified presentation of evidence from the Federal Bureau of Investigation and other agencies".[317]

Several U.S. senators—including Republicans John McCain, Richard Burr, and Lindsey Graham—demanded a congressional investigation.[318] The Senate Intelligence Committee announced the scope of their official inquiry on December 13, 2016, on a bipartisan basis; work began on January 24, 2017.[citation needed]

A formal Special Counsel investigation headed by former FBI director Robert Mueller was initiated in May 2017 to uncover the detailed interference operations by Russia, and to determine whether any people associated with the Trump campaign were complicit in the Russian efforts. Mueller concluded his investigation on March 22, 2019, by submitting his report to Attorney General William Barr.[319]

On March 24, 2019, Barr submitted a letter describing Mueller's conclusions,[320][321] and on April 18, 2019, a redacted version of the Mueller Report was released to the public. It concluded that Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election did occur "in sweeping and systematic fashion" and "violated U.S. criminal law."[322][323]

The first method detailed in the final report was the usage of the Internet Research Agency, waging "a social media campaign that favored presidential candidate Donald J. Trump and disparaged presidential candidate Hillary Clinton".[324] The Internet Research Agency also sought to "provoke and amplify political and social discord in the United States".[325]

The second method of Russian interference saw the Russian intelligence service, the GRU, hacking into email accounts owned by volunteers and employees of the Clinton presidential campaign, including that of campaign chairman John Podesta, and also hacking into "the computer networks of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) and the Democratic National Committee (DNC)". As a result, the GRU obtained hundreds of thousands of hacked documents, and the GRU proceeded by arranging releases of damaging hacked material via the WikiLeaks organization and also GRU's personas "DCLeaks" and "Guccifer 2.0."[326][327][328]

To establish whether a crime was committed by members of the Trump campaign with regard to Russian interference, the special counsel's investigators "applied the framework of conspiracy law", and not the concept of "collusion", because collusion "is not a specific offense or theory of liability found in the United States Code, nor is it a term of art in federal criminal law."[329][330] They also investigated if members of the Trump campaign "coordinated" with Russia, using the definition of "coordination" as having "an agreement—tacit or express—between the Trump campaign and the Russian government on election interference". Investigators further elaborated that merely having "two parties taking actions that were informed by or responsive to the other's actions or interests" was not enough to establish coordination.[331]

The Mueller Report writes that the investigation "identified numerous links between the Russian government and the Trump campaign", found that Russia "perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency" and that the 2016 Trump presidential campaign "expected it would benefit electorally" from Russian hacking efforts. Ultimately, "the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities".[332][333]

However, investigators had an incomplete picture of what had really occurred during the 2016 campaign, due to some associates of Trump campaign providing either false, incomplete or declined testimony, as well as having deleted, unsaved or encrypted communications. As such, the Mueller Report "cannot rule out the possibility" that information then unavailable to investigators would have presented different findings.[334][335]

Other countries

The Justice Department accused George Nader of providing $3.5 million in illicit campaign donations to Hillary Clinton before the elections and to Donald Trump after he won the elections. According to the New York Times, this was an attempt by the government of United Arab Emirates to influence the election.[336]

In December 2018, a Ukrainian court ruled that prosecutors in Ukraine had meddled in the 2016 election by releasing damaging information on Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort.[337]

Notable expressions, phrases, and statements

  • Basket of deplorables: A controversial phrase coined by Hillary Clinton to describe half of those who support Trump.
  • Because you'd be in jail: Off the cuff quip by Donald Trump during the second presidential debate, in rebuttal to Clinton stating it was "awfully good someone with the temperament of Donald Trump is not in charge of the law in our country".
  • Big-league: A word used by Donald Trump most notably during the first presidential debate, misheard by many as bigly, when he said, "I'm going to cut taxes big-league, and you're going to raise taxes big-league."[338][339]
  • Birdie Sanders: During a campaign stop in Portland, Oregon, a house finch[340] landed on Sanders's lectern while he was addressing a large crowd of supporters.[341] The event became popular with the Sanders community and Sanders even began to publicize the bird as "Birdie Sanders".[341]
  • Build the wall: A chant used at many Trump campaign rallies, and Donald Trump's corresponding promise of the Mexican Border Wall.[338]
  • Drain the swamp: A phrase Donald Trump invoked late in the campaign to describe what needs to be done to fix problems in the federal government. Trump acknowledged that the phrase was suggested to him, and he was initially skeptical about using it.[342]
  • Feel the Bern: A phrase chanted by supporters of the Bernie Sanders campaign which was officially adopted by his campaign.[343]
  • Grab 'em by the pussy: A remark made by Trump during a 2005 behind-the-scenes interview with presenter Billy Bush on NBCUniversal's Access Hollywood, which was released during the campaign. The remark was part of a conversation in which Trump boasted that "when you're a star, they let you do it."
  • I like people who weren't captured: Donald Trump's criticism of Senator John McCain, who was a prisoner of war of the North Vietnamese.[344][345]
  • I'm with her: Clinton's unofficial campaign slogan ("Stronger Together" was the official slogan).[346]
  • Lock her up: A chant first used at the Republican convention to claim that Hillary Clinton is guilty of a crime. The chant was later used at many Trump campaign rallies.[347]
  • Make America great again: Donald Trump's campaign slogan.
  • Mexico will pay for it: Trump's campaign promise that if elected he will build a wall on the border between the US and Mexico, with Mexico financing the project.[348][349]
  • Nicknames used by Trump to deride his opponents: These include "Crooked Hillary", "Little Marco", "Low-energy Jeb", and "Lyin' Ted".
  • Russia, if you're listening: Used by Donald Trump to invite Russia to "find the 30,000 emails that are missing" (from Hillary Clinton) during a July 2016 news conference.[350]
  • Such a nasty woman: Donald Trump's response to Hillary Clinton after her saying that her proposed rise in Social Security Contributions would also include Trump's Social Security contributions, "assuming he can't figure out how to get out of it".[338] Later reappropriated by supporters of Clinton[351][352][353] and women's rights.[354][355][356]
  • They're bringing drugs. They're bringing crime. They're rapists. And some, I assume, are good people: Donald Trump's controversial description of those crossing the Mexico–United States border during his June 2015 announcing the launch of his campaign.[357]
  • What is Aleppo?: Uttered by Gary Johnson during an interview when questioned about the status of Aleppo during the Syrian Civil War.[358]
  • What, like with a cloth or something?: Said by Hillary Clinton in response to being asked whether she "wiped" her emails during an August 2015 press conference.[344]
  • What the hell do you have to lose?: Said by Donald Trump to inner-city African Americans at rallies starting on August 19, 2016.[359][360]
  • When they go low, we go high: Said by then-first lady Michelle Obama during her Democratic convention speech.[338] This was later inverted by Eric Holder.[361]
  • Why aren't I 50 points ahead?: Question asked by Hillary Clinton during a video address to the Laborers' International Union of North America on September 21, 2016, which was then turned into an opposition ad by the Trump campaign.[362][363]
  • The lesser evil paves the way for the greater evil.: Jill Stein slogan.[364]

Debates

Primary election

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

General election

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

Map of United States showing debate locations
Hofstra UniversityHempstead, NY
Hofstra University
Hempstead, NY
Longwood UniversityFarmville, VA
Longwood University
Farmville, VA
Washington UniversitySt. Louis, MO
Washington University
St. Louis, MO
University of NevadaLas Vegas
University of Nevada
Las Vegas
Sites of the 2016 general election debates

The Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD), a non-profit organization, hosted debates between qualifying presidential and vice-presidential candidates. According to the commission's website, to be eligible to opt to participate in the anticipated debates, "in addition to being Constitutionally eligible, candidates must appear on a sufficient number of state ballots to have a mathematical chance of winning a majority vote in the Electoral College, and have a level of support of at least 15 percent of the national electorate as determined by five selected national public opinion polling organizations, using the average of those organizations' most recently publicly-reported results at the time of the determination."[365]

The three locations (Hofstra University, Washington University in St. Louis, University of Nevada, Las Vegas) chosen to host the presidential debates, and the one location (Longwood University) selected to host the vice presidential debate, were announced on September 23, 2015. The site of the first debate was originally designated as Wright State University in Dayton, Ohio; however, due to rising costs and security concerns, the debate was moved to Hofstra University in Hempstead, New York.[366]

On August 19, Kellyanne Conway, Trump's campaign manager confirmed that Trump would participate in a series of three debates.[367][368][369][370] Trump had complained two of the scheduled debates, one on September 26 and the other October 9, would have to compete for viewers with National Football League games, referencing the similar complaints made regarding the dates with low expected ratings during the Democratic Party presidential debates.[371]

There were also debates between independent candidates.

Debates among candidates for the 2016 U.S. presidential election
No. Date Time Host City Moderator(s) Participants Viewership

(Millions)

P1 September 26, 2016 9:00 p.m. EDT Hofstra University Hempstead, New York Lester Holt Mr. Donald Trump
Secretary Hillary Clinton
84.0[372]
VP October 4, 2016 9:00 p.m. EDT Longwood University Farmville, Virginia Elaine Quijano Governor Mike Pence
Senator Tim Kaine
37.0[372]
P2 October 9, 2016 8 p.m. CDT Washington University in St. Louis St. Louis, Missouri Anderson Cooper
Martha Raddatz
Mr. Donald Trump
Secretary Hillary Clinton
66.5[372]
P3 October 19, 2016 6 p.m. PDT University of Nevada, Las Vegas Las Vegas, Nevada Chris Wallace Mr. Donald Trump
Secretary Hillary Clinton
71.6[372]

General election polling

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

Results

Election night

The news media and election experts were surprised twice: first, at Trump's winning the GOP nomination; second, at his winning the electoral college. English political scientist Lloyd Gruber said, "One of the major casualties of the 2016 election season has been the reputation of political science, a discipline whose practitioners had largely dismissed Donald Trump's chances of gaining the Republican nomination."[373] The final polls showed a lead by Clinton—and in the end, she did receive more votes.[374] Trump himself expected, based on polling, to lose the election, and rented a small hotel ballroom to make a brief concession speech; "I said if we're going to lose I don't want a big ballroom", he later remarked.[375] The Republican candidate performed surprisingly well in all battleground states, especially Florida, Iowa, Ohio and North Carolina. Even Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Michigan, states that had been predicted to vote Democratic, were won by Trump.[376] Cindy Adams, present at Trump Tower, reported that "Trumptown knew they'd won by 5:30. Math, calculations, candidate dislike causing voter abstention begat the numbers."[377] Trump said that he was surprised by how "that map was getting red as hell. That map was bleeding red ... I always used to believe in [polls]. I don't believe them anymore."[375]:{{{3}}}

According to the authors of Shattered: Inside Hillary Clinton's Doomed Campaign, by late Tuesday night the White House had concluded that Trump would win the election. Obama's political director David Simas called Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook to persuade Clinton to concede the election, with no success. Obama then called Clinton directly, citing the importance of continuity of government, to ask her to publicly acknowledge that Trump had won.[378] Believing that Clinton was still unwilling to concede, the president then called her campaign chair John Podesta, but the call to Clinton had likely already persuaded her.[379]

The next day

On Wednesday morning at 2:30 a.m. Eastern Time (ET), it was reported that Trump had secured Wisconsin's 10 electoral votes, giving him a majority of the 538 electors in the Electoral College, enough to make him the president-elect of the United States.[380]

Clinton called Trump early that morning to concede defeat,[381] and at 2:50 a.m. Trump gave his victory speech.[380] Clinton was unable to make a public concession that night, as she had no concession speech written.[382] Later that day, Clinton asked her supporters to accept the result and hoped that Trump would be "a successful president for all Americans".[383] In his speech, Trump appealed for unity, saying "it is time for us to come together as one united people", and praised Clinton as someone who was owed "a major debt of gratitude for her service to our country".[384]

Statistical analysis

Six states plus a portion of Maine that Obama won in 2012 switched to Trump (Electoral College votes in parentheses): Florida (29), Pennsylvania (20), Ohio (18), Michigan (16), Wisconsin (10), Iowa (6), and Maine's second congressional district (1). Initially, Trump won exactly 100 more Electoral College votes than Mitt Romney had in 2012, with two lost to faithless electors in the final tally. Thirty-nine states swung more Republican compared to the previous presidential election, while eleven states and the District of Columbia swung more Democratic.[261]

Based on United States Census Bureau estimates of the voting age population (VAP), turnout of voters casting a vote for president was nearly 1% higher than 2012.[1] Examining overall turnout in the 2016 election, University of Florida Prof. Michael McDonald estimated that 138.8 million Americans cast a ballot.[385] 65.9 million of those ballots were counted for Clinton and just under 63 million for Trump, representing 20.3% (Clinton) and 19.4% (Trump) of a census estimate of U.S. population that day of 324 million.[261][386] Considering a VAP of 250.6 million people and voting eligible population (VEP) of 230.6 million people, this is a turnout rate of 55.4% VAP and 60.2% VEP.[1][385] Based on this estimate, voter turnout was up compared to 2012 (54.1% VAP) but down compared to 2008 (57.4% VAP). A FEC report of the election recorded an official total of 136.7 million votes cast for President—more than any prior election.[1]

Data scientist Hamdan Azhar noted the paradoxes of the 2016 outcome, saying that "chief among them [was] the discrepancy between the popular vote, which Hillary Clinton won by 2.8 million votes, and the electoral college, where Trump won 304-227".[387] He said Trump outperformed Mitt Romney's 2012 results, while Clinton only just matched Barack Obama's 2012 totals.[387] Hamdan also said Trump was "the highest vote earner of any Republican candidate ever," exceeding George W. Bush's 62.04 million votes in 2004, though neither reached Clinton's 65.9 million, nor Obama's 69.5 million votes in 2008, the overall record.[387] He concluded, with help from The Cook Political Report, that the election hinged not on Clinton's large 2.8 million overall vote margin over Trump, but rather on about 78,000 votes from only three counties in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Michigan (by the same logic, Obama won in 2012 due to three counties in Florida, Ohio, and Pennsylvania).[387][388]

Impact of automation

A 2017 study done by Economists and Economic Historians Carl Benedikt Frey, Chinchih Chen and Thor Berger examines the link between the adoption of automation and the results of the 2016 election. The study points out that since the 1980s, the advancement of technology has often led to a significant fraction of the workforce being worse off. Low skilled workers affected by technology driven job displacement had to replace their middle-income jobs with lower-income service jobs, or were pushed out of the workforce altogether, while the advancement of technology increased the demand for high-income jobs among skilled workers. Frey and his co-authors note a positive trend between automation driven income inequality and the movement toward political polarization in the United States. The study found a strong correlation between areas affected by technological automation and the increase of support for Donald Trump among low-skilled workers in the affected voting districts, concluding that:

While the Computer Revolution has not rendered the workforce redundant, a large share of Americans have lost the race to technology, which is reflected in the reallocation of millions of workers from middle-income jobs to low-income occupations or non-employment as their jobs have been automated away ... the victims of the Computer Revolution have a higher propensity to opt for radical political change: electoral districts with a higher share of jobs exposed to automation were significantly more likely to support Trump. The 2016 U.S. Presidential Election can thus be described as a riot against machines by democratic means.[389]

Candidates table

Presidential candidate Party Home state Popular vote Electoral
vote
Running mate
Count Pct Vice-presidential candidate Home state Elect. vote
Donald Trump Republican New York 62,984,828 46.09% 304 (306) Mike Pence Indiana 304
Hillary Clinton Democratic New York 65,853,514 48.18% 227 (232) Tim Kaine Virginia 227
Gary Johnson Libertarian New Mexico 4,489,341 3.28% 0 Bill Weld Massachusetts 0
Jill Stein Green Massachusetts 1,457,218 1.07% 0 Ajamu Baraka Illinois 0
Evan McMullin Independent Utah 731,991 0.54% 0 Mindy Finn District of Columbia 0
Darrell Castle Constitution Tennessee 203,090 0.15% 0 Scott Bradley Utah 0
Bernie Sanders[lower-alpha 3] Independent Vermont 111,850[lower-alpha 4] 0.08%[lower-alpha 4] 1 (0) Elizabeth Warren[lower-alpha 3] Massachusetts 1
Gloria La Riva Socialism and Liberation California 74,401 0.05% 0 Eugene Puryear District of Columbia 0
John Kasich[lower-alpha 3][lower-alpha 5] Republican Ohio 2,684[lower-alpha 4] 0.00%[lower-alpha 4] 1 (0) Carly Fiorina[lower-alpha 3][lower-alpha 5] Virginia 1
Ron Paul[lower-alpha 3][lower-alpha 5] Libertarian Texas 124[lower-alpha 4] 0.00%[lower-alpha 4] 1 (0) Mike Pence Indiana 1
Colin Powell[lower-alpha 3] Republican Virginia 25[lower-alpha 4] 0.00%[lower-alpha 4] 3 (0) Elizabeth Warren[lower-alpha 3] Massachusetts 1
Maria Cantwell[lower-alpha 3] Washington 1
Susan Collins[lower-alpha 3] Maine 1
Faith Spotted Eagle[lower-alpha 3] Democratic South Dakota 0 0.00% 1 (0) Winona LaDuke[lower-alpha 3] Minnesota 1
Other 760,210 0.56% Other
Total 136,669,276 100% 538 538
Needed to win 270 270

Notes:

  1. 1.0 1.1 In state-by-state tallies, Trump earned 306 pledged electors, Clinton 232. They lost respectively two and five votes to faithless electors. Vice Presidential candidates Pence and Kaine lost one and five votes, respectively.
  2. In early elections, beginning with the election of George Washington, many electors were chosen by state legislatures instead of public balloting and, in those states which practiced public balloting, votes were cast for undifferentiated lists of candidates, leaving no or only partial vote totals. Some states continued to allocate electors by legislative vote as late as 1876.[21]
  3. 3.00 3.01 3.02 3.03 3.04 3.05 3.06 3.07 3.08 3.09 3.10 Received electoral vote(s) from a faithless elector.
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7 Candidate received votes as a write-in. The exact numbers of write-in votes for Sanders have been published for three states: California, Vermont, and New Hampshire.[390] It was possible to vote Sanders as a write-in candidate in 14 states.[391]
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 Two faithless electors from Texas cast their presidential votes for Ron Paul and John Kasich, respectively. Chris Suprun said he cast his presidential vote for John Kasich and his vice presidential vote for Carly Fiorina. The other faithless elector in Texas, Bill Greene, cast his presidential vote for Ron Paul but cast his vice presidential vote for Mike Pence, as pledged. John Kasich received recorded write-in votes in Alabama, Georgia, Illinois, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Vermont.
Popular vote[260][261]
Clinton
  
48.18%
Trump
  
46.09%
Johnson
  
3.28%
Stein
  
1.07%
McMullin
  
0.54%
Others
  
0.84%
232 306
Clinton Trump
Electoral vote—Pledged
Trump/Pence
  
56.88%
Clinton/Kaine
  
43.12%
Electoral vote—President
Trump
  
56.51%
Clinton
  
42.19%
Powell
  
0.56%
Kasich
  
0.19%
Paul
  
0.19%
Sanders
  
0.19%
Spotted Eagle
  
0.19%
Electoral vote—Vice President
Pence
  
56.69%
Kaine
  
42.19%
Warren
  
0.37%
Cantwell
  
0.19%
Collins
  
0.19%
Fiorina
  
0.19%
LaDuke
  
0.19%

Results by state

The table below displays the official vote tallies by each state's Electoral College voting method. The source for the results of all states is the official Federal Election Commission report. The column labeled "Margin" shows Trump's margin of victory over Clinton (the margin is negative for every state that Clinton won).

A total of 29 third party and independent presidential candidates appeared on the ballot in at least one state. Former Governor of New Mexico Gary Johnson and physician Jill Stein repeated their 2012 roles as the nominees for the Libertarian Party and the Green Party, respectively.[392] With ballot access to the entire national electorate, Johnson received nearly 4.5 million votes (3.27%), the highest nationwide vote share for a third-party candidate since Ross Perot in 1996,[393] while Stein received almost 1.45 million votes (1.06%), the most for a Green nominee since Ralph Nader in 2000.

Independent candidate Evan McMullin, who appeared on the ballot in 11 states, received over 732,000 votes (0.53%). He won 21.4% of the vote in his home state of Utah, the highest share of the vote for a third-party candidate in any state since 1992.[394] Despite dropping out of the election following his defeat in the Democratic primary, Senator Bernie Sanders received 5.7% of the vote in his home state of Vermont, the highest write-in draft campaign percentage for a presidential candidate in American history.[395] Johnson and McMullin were the first third-party candidates since Nader to receive at least 5% of the vote in one or more states, with Johnson crossing the mark in 11 states and McMullin crossing it in two.

Aside from Florida and North Carolina, the states which secured Trump's victory are situated in the Great Lakes/Rust Belt region. Wisconsin went Republican for the first time since 1984, while Pennsylvania and Michigan went Republican for the first time since 1988.[396][397][398] Trump also won Maine's 2nd congressional district, which had also not been won by a Republican presidential candidate since 1988. Stein petitioned for a recount in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania. The Clinton campaign pledged to participate in the Green Party recount efforts, while Trump backers challenged them in court.[399][400][401] Meanwhile, American Delta Party/Reform Party presidential candidate Rocky De La Fuente petitioned for and was granted a partial recount in Nevada.[402]

States won by Clinton/Kaine
States won by Trump/Pence

Electoral methods

  • WTA—Statewide winner-takes-all
  • CD—Congressional district*
Hillary Clinton
Democratic
Donald Trump
Republican
Gary Johnson
Libertarian
Jill Stein
Green
Evan McMullin
Independent
Others Margin Total
State or
district
Electoral
method
#  % Electoral
votes
#  % Electoral
votes
#  % Electoral
votes
#  % Electoral
votes
#  % Electoral
votes
#  % Electoral
votes
#  % # State Source(s)
Alabama WTA 729,547 34.36% 1,318,255 62.08% 9 44,467 2.09% 9,391 0.44% 21,712 1.02% 588,708 27.73% 2,123,372 AL [403]
Alaska WTA 116,454 36.55% 163,387 51.28% 3 18,725 5.88% 5,735 1.80% 14,307 4.49% 46,933 14.73% 318,608 AK [404]
Arizona WTA 1,161,167 45.13% 1,252,401 48.67% 11 106,327 4.13% 34,345 1.33% 17,449 0.68% 1,476 0.06% 91,234 3.55% 2,573,165 AZ [405]
Arkansas WTA 380,494 33.65% 684,872 60.57% 6 29,829 2.64% 9,473 0.84% 13,255 1.17% 12,712 1.12% 304,378 26.92% 1,130,635 AR [406]
California WTA 8,753,788 61.73% 55 4,483,810 31.62% 478,500 3.37% 278,657 1.96% 39,596 0.28% 147,244 1.04% −4,269,978 −30.11% 14,181,595 CA [407]
Colorado WTA 1,338,870 48.16% 9 1,202,484 43.25% 144,121 5.18% 38,437 1.38% 28,917 1.04% 27,418 0.99% −136,386 −4.91% 2,780,247 CO [408]
Connecticut WTA 897,572 54.57% 7 673,215 40.93% 48,676 2.96% 22,841 1.39% 2,108 0.13% 508 0.03% −224,357 −13.64% 1,644,920 CT [409]
Delaware WTA 235,603 53.09% 3 185,127 41.72% 14,757 3.32% 6,103 1.37% 706 0.16% 1,518 0.34% −50,476 −11.37% 443,814 DE [410][411]
District of Columbia WTA 282,830 90.48% 3 12,723 4.07% 4,906 1.57% 4,258 1.36% 6,551 2.52% −270,107 −86.78% 311,268 DC [412]
Florida WTA 4,504,975 47.82% 4,617,886 49.02% 29 207,043 2.20% 64,399 0.68% 25,736 0.28% 112,911 1.20% 9,420,039 FL [413]
Georgia WTA 1,877,963 45.64% 2,089,104 50.77% 16 125,306 3.05% 7,674 0.19% 13,017 0.32% 1,668 0.04% 211,141 5.13% 4,114,732 GA [414][415]
Hawaii WTA 266,891 62.22% 3 128,847 30.03% 15,954 3.72% 12,737 2.97% 4,508 1.05% 1 −138,044 −32.18% 428,937 HI [416]
Idaho WTA 189,765 27.49% 409,055 59.26% 4 28,331 4.10% 8,496 1.23% 46,476 6.73% 8,132 1.18% 219,290 31.77% 690,255 ID [417]
Illinois WTA 3,090,729 55.83% 20 2,146,015 38.76% 209,596 3.79% 76,802 1.39% 11,655 0.21% 1,627 0.03% −944,714 −17.06% 5,536,424 IL [418]
Indiana WTA 1,033,126 37.91% 1,557,286 56.82% 11 133,993 4.89% 7,841 0.27% 2,712 0.10% 524,160 19.17% 2,734,958 IN [419]
Iowa WTA 653,669 41.74% 800,983 51.15% 6 59,186 3.78% 11,479 0.73% 12,366 0.79% 28,348 1.81% 147,314 9.41% 1,566,031 IA [420]
Kansas WTA 427,005 36.05% 671,018 56.65% 6 55,406 4.68% 23,506 1.98% 6,520 0.55% 947 0.08% 244,013 20.60% 1,184,402 KS [421]
Kentucky WTA 628,854 32.68% 1,202,971 62.52% 8 53,752 2.79% 13,913 0.72% 22,780 1.18% 1,879 0.10% 574,177 29.84% 1,924,149 KY [422]
Louisiana WTA 780,154 38.45% 1,178,638 58.09% 8 37,978 1.87% 14,031 0.69% 8,547 0.42% 9,684 0.48% 398,484 19.64% 2,029,032 LA [423]
Maine (at-lg) WTA[lower-alpha 1] 357,735 47.83% 2 335,593 44.87% 38,105 5.09% 14,251 1.91% 1,887 0.25% 356 0.05% −22,142 −2.96% 747,927 ME–a/l [424][425]
Maine, 1st CD[lower-alpha 1] 212,774 53.96% 1 154,384 39.15% 18,592 4.71% 7,563 1.92% 807 0.20% 209 0.05% −58,390 −14.81% 394,329 ME-1
Maine, 2nd CD[lower-alpha 1] 144,817 40.98% 181,177 51.26% 1 19,510 5.52% 6,685 1.89% 1,080 0.31% 147 0.04% 36,360 10.29% 353,416 ME-2 [424][425]
Maryland WTA 1,677,928 60.33% 10 943,169 33.91% 79,605 2.86% 35,945 1.29% 9,630 0.35% 35,169 1.26% −734,759 −26.42% 2,781,446 MD [426]
Massachusetts WTA 1,995,196 60.01% 11 1,090,893 32.81% 138,018 4.15% 47,661 1.43% 2,719 0.08% 50,559 1.52% −904,303 −27.20% 3,325,046 MA [427]
Michigan WTA 2,268,839 47.27% 2,279,543 47.50% 16 172,136 3.59% 51,463 1.07% 8,177 0.17% 19,126 0.40% 10,704 0.23% 4,799,284 MI [428]
Minnesota WTA 1,367,716 46.44% 10 1,322,951 44.92% 112,972 3.84% 36,985 1.26% 53,076 1.80% 51,113 1.74% −44,765 −1.52% 2,944,813 MN [429]
Mississippi WTA 485,131 40.11% 700,714 57.94% 6 14,435 1.19% 3,731 0.31% 5,346 0.44% 215,583 17.83% 1,209,357 MS [430]
Missouri WTA 1,071,068 38.14% 1,594,511 56.77% 10 97,359 3.47% 25,419 0.91% 7,071 0.25% 13,177 0.47% 523,443 18.64% 2,808,605 MO [431]
Montana WTA 177,709 35.75% 279,240 56.17% 3 28,037 5.64% 7,970 1.60% 2,297 0.46% 1,894 0.38% 101,531 20.42% 497,147 MT [432][433]
Nebraska (at-lg) WTA 284,494 33.70% 495,961 58.75% 2 38,946 4.61% 8,775 1.04% 16,051 1.90% 211,467 25.05% 844,227 NE–a/l [434]
Nebraska, 1st CD 100,126 35.46% 158,626 56.18% 1 14,031 4.97% 3,374 1.19% 6,181 2.19% 58,500 20.72% 282,338 NE-1
Nebraska, 2nd CD 131,030 44.92% 137,564 47.16% 1 13,245 4.54% 3,347 1.15% 6,494 2.23% 6,534 2.24% 291,680 NE-2
Nebraska, 3rd CD 53,290 19.73% 199,657 73.92% 1 11,657 4.32% 2,054 0.76% 3,451 1.28% 146,367 54.19% 270,109 NE-3
Nevada WTA 539,260 47.50% 6 512,058 45.98% 37,384 3.29% 36,683 3.23% −27,202 −2.42% 1,125,385 NV [435]
New Hampshire WTA 348,526 46.98% 4 345,790 46.61% 30,777 4.15% 6,496 0.88% 1,064 0.14% 11,643 1.24% −2,736 −0.37% 744,296 NH [436]
New Jersey WTA 2,148,278 54.99% 14 1,601,933 41.00% 72,477 1.86% 37,772 0.97% 13,586 1.18% −546,345 −14.10% 3,874,046 NJ [437]
New Mexico WTA 385,234 48.26% 5 319,667 40.04% 74,541 9.34% 9,879 1.24% 5,825 0.73% 3,173 0.40% −65,567 −8.21% 798,319 NM [438]
New York WTA 4,556,124 59.01% 29 2,819,534 36.52% 176,598 2.29% 107,934 1.40% 10,373 0.13% 50,890 0.66% −1,736,590 −22.49% 7,721,453 NY [439]
North Carolina WTA 2,189,316 46.17% 2,362,631 49.83% 15 130,126 2.74% 12,105 0.26% 47,386 1.00% 173,315 3.66% 4,741,564 NC [440]
North Dakota WTA 93,758 27.23% 216,794 62.96% 3 21,434 6.22% 3,780 1.10% 8,594 2.49% 123,036 35.73% 344,360 ND [441]
Ohio WTA 2,394,164 43.56% 2,841,005 51.69% 18 174,498 3.17% 46,271 0.84% 12,574 0.23% 27,975 0.51% 446,841 8.13% 5,496,487 OH [442]
Oklahoma WTA 420,375 28.93% 949,136 65.32% 7 83,481 5.75% N/A N/A 528,761 37.08% 1,452,992 OK [443]
Oregon WTA 1,002,106 50.07% 7 782,403 39.09% 94,231 4.71% 50,002 2.50% 72,594 3.63% −219,703 −10.98% 2,001,336 OR [444]
Pennsylvania WTA 2,926,441 47.46% 2,970,733 48.18% 20 146,715 2.38% 49,941 0.81% 6,472 0.11% 65,176 1.06% 44,292 0.72% 6,165,478 PA [445]
Rhode Island WTA 252,525 54.41% 4 180,543 38.90% 14,746 3.18% 6,220 1.34% 516 0.11% 9,594 2.07% −71,982 −15.51% 464,144 RI [446]
South Carolina WTA 855,373 40.67% 1,155,389 54.94% 9 49,204 2.34% 13,034 0.62% 21,016 1.00% 9,011 0.43% 300,016 14.27% 2,103,027 SC [447]
South Dakota WTA 117,458 31.74% 227,721 61.53% 3 20,850 5.63% 4,064 1.10% 110,263 29.79% 370,093 SD [448]
Tennessee WTA 870,695 34.72% 1,522,925 60.72% 11 70,397 2.81% 15,993 0.64% 11,991 0.48% 16,026 0.64% 652,230 26.01% 2,508,027 TN [449]
Texas WTA 3,877,868 43.24% 4,685,047 52.23% 36 283,492 3.16% 71,558 0.80% 42,366 0.47% 8,895 0.10% 2 807,179 8.99% 8,969,226 TX [450]
Utah WTA 310,676 27.46% 515,231 45.54% 6 39,608 3.50% 9,438 0.83% 243,690 21.54% 12,787 1.13% 204,555 18.08% 1,131,430 UT [451]
Vermont WTA 178,573 56.68% 3 95,369 30.27% 10,078 3.20% 6,758 2.14% 639 0.20% 23,650 7.51% −83,204 −26.41% 315,067 VT [452]
Virginia WTA 1,981,473 49.73% 13 1,769,443 44.41% 118,274 2.97% 27,638 0.69% 54,054 1.36% 33,749 0.85% −212,030 −5.32% 3,984,631 VA [453]
Washington WTA 1,742,718 52.54% 8 1,221,747 36.83% 160,879 4.85% 58,417 1.76% 133,258 4.02% 4 −520,971 −15.71% 3,317,019 WA [454]
West Virginia WTA 188,794 26.43% 489,371 68.50% 5 23,004 3.22% 8,075 1.13% 1,104 0.15% 4,075 0.57% 300,577 42.07% 714,423 WV [455]
Wisconsin WTA 1,382,536 46.45% 1,405,284 47.22% 10 106,674 3.58% 31,072 1.04% 11,855 0.40% 38,729 1.30% 22,748 0.77% 2,976,150 WI [456]
Wyoming WTA 55,973 21.63% 174,419 67.40% 3 13,287 5.13% 2,515 0.97% 9,655 3.73% 118,446 46.30% 255,849 WY [457]
U.S. total 65,853,514 48.18% 227 62,984,828 46.09% 304 4,489,341 3.28% 1,457,218 1.07% 731,991 0.54% 1,154,084 0.84% 7 −2,868,686 −2.10% 136,669,276 US
Hillary Clinton
Democratic
Donald Trump
Republican
Gary Johnson
Libertarian
Jill Stein
Green
Evan McMullin
Independent
Others Margin Total
  • Two states (Maine and Nebraska) allow for their electoral votes to be split between candidates.[lower-alpha 1] The winner within each congressional district gets one electoral vote for the district. The winner of the statewide vote gets two additional electoral votes.[459][460]

Results are from The New York Times.[461]

Battleground states

File:Presidential Election Results Swing by State from 2012 to 2016.svg
Vote margin swing by state 2012 to 2016. Only eleven states (as well as the District of Columbia) trended more Democratic: Arizona, California, Georgia, Illinois, Kansas, Maryland, Massachusetts, Texas, Washington, Virginia and Utah. The large swing in Utah is mostly, but not completely, due to the votes for third candidate Evan McMullin and the 2012 candidacy of Mitt Romney.

Most media outlets announced the beginning of the presidential race about twenty months prior to Election Day. Soon after the first contestants declared their candidacy, Larry Sabato listed Virginia, Colorado, Iowa, New Hampshire, Florida, Nevada, and Ohio as the seven states most likely to be contested in the general election. After Donald Trump clinched the Republican presidential nomination, many pundits felt that the major campaign locations might be different from what had originally been expected.[462]

Rust Belt states such as Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and even Michigan were thought to be in play with Trump as the nominee, while states with large minority populations, such as Colorado and Virginia, were expected to shift towards Clinton.[463] By the conventions period and the debates, however, it did not seem as though the Rust Belt states could deliver a victory to Trump, as many of them were considered to be part of the "blue wall" of Democratic-leaning states. Trump's courting of the Polish-American vote, a sizable number of whom were Reagan Democrats, has been cited as the cause for the loss of the Rust Belt by the Democratic nominee.[464] According to Politico[465] and the 538 online blog, his path to victory went through states such as Florida, North Carolina, Nevada, New Hampshire, and possibly Colorado.[466][467][468][469]

Early polling indicated a closer-than-usual race in former Democratic strongholds such as Washington, Delaware, New Jersey, Connecticut, Maine (for the two statewide electoral votes), and New Mexico.[470][471][472] Meanwhile, research indicators from inside of a host of Republican-leaning states such as Arizona, Indiana, Georgia, South Carolina, Alaska, Utah, Texas, Kansas, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, and South Dakota reported weaker support for Trump than expected, although the nominee's position solidified in a few other areas. Some reviews took this information as evidence of an expanded 'swing-state map'.[473]

A consensus among political pundits developed throughout the primary election season regarding swing states.[474] From the results of presidential elections from 2004 through to 2012, the Democratic and Republican parties would generally start with a safe electoral vote count of about 150 to 200.[475][476] However, the margins required to constitute a swing state are vague, and can vary between groups of analysts.[477][478] It was thought that left-leaning states in the Rust Belt could become more conservative, as Trump had strong appeal among many blue-collar workers.[479] They represent a large portion of the American populace and were a major factor in Trump's eventual nomination. Trump's primary campaign was propelled by victories in Democratic states, and his supporters often did not identify as Republican.[480] In addition, local factors may come into play. For example, Utah was the reddest state in 2012, although the Republican share was boosted significantly by the candidacy of Mormon candidate Mitt Romney.[477] Despite its partisan orientation, some reports suggested a victory there by independent candidate Evan McMullin, particularly if there was a nationwide blowout.[478]

Media reports indicated that both candidates planned to concentrate on Florida, Pennsylvania, Ohio and North Carolina.[481][482] Among the Republican-leaning states, potential Democratic targets included Nebraska's second congressional district, Georgia, and Arizona.[483] Trump's relatively poor polling in some traditionally Republican states, such as Utah, raised the possibility that they could vote for Clinton, despite easy wins there by recent Republican nominees.[484] However, many analysts asserted that these states were not yet viable Democratic destinations.[485][486] Several sites and individuals publish electoral predictions. These generally rate the race by the likelihood for each party to win a state.[487] The "tossup" label is usually used to indicate that neither party has an advantage, "lean" to indicate a party has a slight edge, "likely" to indicate a party has a clear but not overwhelming advantage, and "safe" to indicate a party has an advantage that cannot be overcome.[488]

As the parameters of the race established themselves, analysts converged on a narrower list of contested states, which were relatively similar to those of recent elections. On November 7, the Cook Political Report categorized Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Iowa, Michigan, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin as states with close races. Additionally, a district from each of Maine and Nebraska were considered to be coin flips.[489] Meanwhile, FiveThirtyEight listed twenty-two states as potentially competitive about a month before the election—Maine's two at-large electoral votes, New Mexico, Minnesota, Michigan, Colorado, Virginia, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, New Hampshire, Nevada, Florida, North Carolina, Ohio, Iowa, Arizona, Georgia, Alaska, South Carolina, Texas, Indiana, Missouri, and Utah—as well as Maine's second and Nebraska's second congressional districts.[490] Nate Silver, the publication's editor-in-chief, subsequently removed Texas, South Carolina, Missouri, and Indiana from the list after the race tightened significantly.[491] These conclusions were supported by models such as the Princeton Elections Consortium, the New York Times Upshot, and punditry evaluations from Sabato's Crystal Ball and the Cook Political Report.[492][493][494][495]

After the conventions of the national parties, Clinton and Trump carried out a total of 72 visits to Florida, 59 to Pennsylvania, 52 to North Carolina, 43 to Ohio, 25 to Virginia, 24 to Michigan, 23 to Iowa, 22 to New Hampshire, 19 to Colorado, 16 to Nevada, 15 to Wisconsin, and 10 to Arizona.[citation needed]

Hillary Clinton won states like New Mexico by less than 10 percentage points.[496] Among the states where the candidates finished at a margin of within seven percent, Clinton won Virginia (13 electoral votes), Colorado (9), Maine (2), Minnesota (10), and New Hampshire (4). On the other hand, Trump won Michigan (16), Pennsylvania (20), Wisconsin (10), Florida (29), North Carolina (15), Arizona (11), Nebraska's second district (1), and Georgia (16). States won by Obama in the 2012, such as Ohio (18), Iowa (6), and Maine's second district (1), were also won by Trump. The close result in Maine was not expected by most commentators, nor were Trump's victory of over 10 points in the second district and their disparities.[497][498][499] The dramatic shift of Midwestern states towards Trump were contrasted in the media against the relative movement of Southern states towards the Democrats.[500] For example, former Democratic strongholds such as Minnesota and Maine leaned towards the GOP. Meanwhile, Iowa voted more Republican than Texas did, Georgia was more Democratic than Ohio, and the margin of victory for Trump was greater in North Carolina than Arizona.[501][502] Trump's smaller victories in Alaska and Utah also took some experts by surprise.[503]

Close states were:

States where the margin of victory was under 1% (50 electoral votes; 46 won by Trump, four by Clinton):

  1. Michigan, 0.23% – 16
  2. New Hampshire, 0.37% – 4
  3. Pennsylvania, 0.72% – 20 (tipping point state, including two faithless GOP electors)[504]
  4. Wisconsin, 0.77% – 10 (tipping point state, excluding the two faithless GOP electors)[504]

States/districts where the margin of victory was between 1% and 5% (83 electoral votes; 56 won by Trump, 27 by Clinton):

  1. Florida, 1.20% – 29
  2. Minnesota, 1.52% – 10
  3. Nebraska's 2nd Congressional District, 2.24% – 1
  4. Nevada, 2.42% – 6
  5. Maine, 2.96% – 2
  6. Arizona, 3.55% – 11
  7. North Carolina, 3.66% – 15
  8. Colorado, 4.91% – 9

States where the margin of victory was between 5% and 10% (94 electoral votes; 76 won by Trump, 18 by Clinton):

  1. Georgia, 5.16% – 16
  2. Virginia, 5.32% – 13
  3. Ohio, 8.13% – 18
  4. New Mexico, 8.21% – 5
  5. Texas, 8.99% – 36
  6. Iowa, 9.41% – 6

Red denotes states (or congressional districts) won by Republican Donald Trump; blue denotes those won by Democrat Hillary Clinton.

Maps

Voter demographics

Voter demographic data for 2016 were collected by Edison Research for the National Election Pool, a consortium of ABC News, CBS News, MSNBC, CNN, Fox News and the Associated Press. The voter survey is based on exit polls completed by 24,537 voters leaving 350 voting places throughout the United States on Election Day, in addition to 4,398 telephone interviews with early and absentee voters.[505] Trump's crucial victories in the Midwest were aided in large part by his strong margins among non-college whites—while Obama lost those voters by a margin of 10 points in 2012, Clinton lost this group by 20 percent. The election also represented the first time that Republicans performed better among lower-income whites than among affluent white voters.[506] To some analysts' surprise, Trump narrowed Clinton's margin compared to Obama by seven points among blacks and African-Americans, eight points among Latinos, and 11 points among Asian-Americans. Meanwhile, Trump increased his lead with non-Hispanic white voters through one percent over Mitt Romney's performance, and American Indians, Alaska Natives, and Pacific Islanders shifted their support towards the Republican candidate using the same relative amount.[507] Additionally, although 74 percent of Muslim voters supported Clinton, Trump nearly doubled his support among those voters compared to Mitt Romney, according to the Council on American–Islamic Relations exit poll.[508]

However, "more convincing data"[509] from the polling firm Latino Decisions indicates that Clinton received a higher share of the Hispanic vote, and Trump a lower share, than the Edison exit polls showed. Using wider, more geographically and linguistically representative sampling, Latino Decisions concluded that Clinton won 79% of Hispanic voters (also an improvement over Obama's share in 2008 and 2012), while Trump won only 18% (lower than previous Republicans such as Romney and McCain).[510] Additionally, the 2016 Cooperative Congressional Election Study found that Clinton's share of the Hispanic vote was one percentage point higher than Obama's in 2012, while Trump's was seven percentage points lower than Romney's.[511]

Similarly, a large, multi-lingual study by the Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund found that Clinton won 79% of Asian-American voters, higher than the Edison exit poll showed, while Trump won only 18%, a decrease from McCain's and Romney's numbers.[512] Furthermore, according to the AALDEF's report, Trump received merely 2% of the Muslim-American vote, whereas Clinton received 97%.[513]

2016 Presidential vote by demographic subgroup (Edison Exit Polling)
Demographic subgroup Clinton Trump Other  % of
total vote
Total vote 48 46 6 100
Ideology
Liberals 84 10 6 26
Moderates 52 41 7 39
Conservatives 15 81 4 35
Party
Democrats 89 9 2 37
Republicans 7 90 3 33
Independents 42 48 10 31
Party by gender
Democratic men 87 10 3 14
Democratic women 90 8 2 23
Republican men 6 90 2 17
Republican women 8 89 2 16
Independent men 37 51 10 17
Independent women 47 43 7 14
Gender
Men 41 52 7 47
Women 54 41 5 53
Marital status
Married 44 52 4 59
Unmarried 55 37 8 41
Gender by marital status
Married men 37 58 5 29
Married women 49 47 4 30
Non-married men 46 45 9 19
Non-married women 62 33 5 23
Race/ethnicity
White 37 58 5 70
Black 88 8 4 12
Asian 65 29 6 4
Other 56 37 7 3
Hispanic (of any race) 65 29 6 11
Gender by race/ethnicity
White men 31 63 5 34
White women 43 53 3 37
Black men 80 13 6 5
Black women 94 4 2 7
Latino men (of any race) 62 33 4 5
Latino women (of any race) 68 26 5 6
All other races 61 32 5 6
Religion
Protestant 37 60 3 27
Catholic 45 52 3 23
Mormon 25 61 14 1
Other Christian 43 55 2 24
Jewish 71 24 5 3
Other religion 58 33 9 7
None 68 26 6 15
Religious service attendance
Weekly or more 40 56 4 33
Monthly 46 49 5 16
A few times a year 48 47 5 29
Never 62 31 7 22
White evangelical or born-again Christian
White evangelical or born-again Christian 16 81 3 26
Everyone else 59 35 6 74
Age
18–24 years old 56 35 9 10
25–29 years old 53 39 8 9
30–39 years old 51 40 9 17
40–49 years old 46 50 4 19
50–64 years old 44 53 3 30
65 and older 45 53 2 15
Age by race
Whites 18–29 years old 43 47 10 12
Whites 30–44 years old 37 54 9 16
Whites 45–64 years old 34 62 4 30
Whites 65 and older 39 58 3 13
Blacks 18–29 years old 85 9 6 3
Blacks 30–44 years old 89 7 4 4
Blacks 45–64 years old 89 7 4 5
Blacks 65 and older 91 9 n/a 1
Latinos 18–29 years old 68 26 6 3
Latinos 30–44 years old 65 28 7 4
Latinos 45–64 years old 64 32 4 4
Latinos 65 and older 73 25 2 1
Others 61 31 8 6
Sexual orientation
LGBT 78 14 8 5
Heterosexual 47 48 5 95
First time voter
First time voter 56 40 4 10
Everyone else 47 47 6 90
Education
High school or less 45 51 4 18
Some college education 43 52 5 32
College graduate 49 45 6 32
Postgraduate education 58 37 5 18
Education by race/ethnicity
White college graduates 45 49 4 37
White no college degree 28 67 4 34
Non-white college graduates 71 23 5 13
Non-white no college degree 75 20 3 16
Education by race/ethnicity/sex
White women with college degrees 51 44 5 20
White men with college degrees 39 53 8 17
White women without college degrees 34 61 5 17
White men without college degrees 23 71 6 16
Non-whites 74 21 5 29
Family income
Under $30,000 53 41 6 17
$30,000–49,999 51 42 7 19
$50,000–99,999 46 50 4 31
$100,000–199,999 47 48 5 24
$200,000–249,999 48 49 3 4
Over $250,000 46 48 6 6
Union households
Union 51 42 7 18
Non-union 46 48 6 82
Military service
Veterans 34 60 6 13
Non-veterans 50 44 6 87
Issue regarded as most important
Foreign policy 60 34 6 13
Immigration 32 64 4 13
Economy 52 42 6 52
Terrorism 39 57 4 18
Region
Northeast 55 40 5 19
Midwest 45 49 6 23
South 44 52 4 37
West 55 39 6 21
Community size
Cities (population 50,000 and above) 59 35 6 34
Suburbs 45 50 5 49
Rural areas 34 62 4 17

Forecasting

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

Various methods were used to forecast the outcome of the 2016 election.[514] For the 2016 election, there were many competing election forecast approaches including Nate Silver's FiveThirtyEight, The Upshot at The New York Times, Daily Kos, Princeton Election Consortium, Cook Political Report, Rothenberg and Gonzales, PollyVote, Sabato's Crystal Ball and Electoral-Vote. These models mostly showed a Democratic advantage since the nominees were confirmed, and were supported by pundits and statisticians, including Nate Silver of FiveThirtyEight, Nate Cohn at The New York Times, and Larry Sabato from the Crystal Ball newsletter, who predicted a Democratic victory in competitive presidential races and projected consistent leads in several battleground states around the country.[515] The near-unanimity of forecasters in predicting a Clinton victory may have been the result of groupthink. However, FiveThirtyEight's model pointed to the possibility of an Electoral College-popular vote split widening in the final weeks based on Trump's improvement in swing states like Florida or Pennsylvania. This was due to the demographics targeted by Trump's campaign which lived in big numbers there, in addition to Clinton's poor performance in several of those swing states in comparison with Obama's performance in 2012, as well as having a big number of her potential voters in very populated traditionally 'blue' states, but also in some very populated states traditionally 'red', like Texas, which were projected safe for Trump.[516]

Early exit polls generally favored Clinton.[517] After the polls closed and some of the results came in, the forecasts were found to be inaccurate, as Trump performed better in the competitive Midwestern states, such as Iowa, Ohio, and Minnesota, than expected. Three states (Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan) which were considered to be part of Clinton's firewall, were won by Trump.[517] Of the states in the Great Lakes region, Clinton won the swing state of Minnesota by one point, as well as traditional Democratic strongholds such as New York and Illinois with populous urban centers. This result stands in contrast to that of 2012, when President Obama won all but Indiana and North Carolina, which he carried in 2008. This table displays the final polling average published by Real Clear Politics on November 7, the actual electoral margin, and the over-performance by either candidate relative to the polls.

State Electoral votes Polling average Final result Difference
Arizona 11 Trump +4[518] Trump +3.5 Clinton +0.5
Colorado 9 Clinton +2.9[519] Clinton +4.9 Clinton +2
Florida 29 Trump +0.2[520] Trump +1.2 Trump +1
Georgia 16 Trump +4.8[521] Trump +5.1 Trump +0.3
Iowa 6 Trump +3[522] Trump +9.5 Trump +6.5
Maine 4 Clinton +4.5[523] Clinton +2.9 Trump +1.6
Michigan 16 Clinton +3.4[524] Trump +0.3 Trump +3.7
Minnesota 10 Clinton +6.2[525] Clinton +1.5 Trump +4.7
Nevada 6 Trump +0.8[526] Clinton +2.4 Clinton +3.2
New Hampshire 4 Clinton +0.6[527] Clinton +0.3 Trump +0.3
New Mexico 5 Clinton +5[528] Clinton +8.3 Clinton +3.3
North Carolina 15 Trump +1[529] Trump +3.7 Trump +2.7
Ohio 18 Trump +3.5[530] Trump +8.1 Trump +4.6
Pennsylvania 20 Clinton +1.9[531] Trump +0.7 Trump +2.6
Virginia 13 Clinton +5[532] Clinton +5.4 Clinton +0.4
Wisconsin 10 Clinton +6.5[533] Trump +0.7 Trump +7.2

Many pollsters were puzzled by the failure of mainstream forecasting models to predict the outcome of the 2016 election.[534][535] Some journalists compared the 2016 election to the failure of prognosticator Arthur Henning in the "Dewey Defeats Truman" incident from the 1948 presidential election.[536][537] Sean Trende, writing for RealClearPolitics, wrote that many of the polls were accurate, but that the pundits' interpretation of these polls neglected polling error.[538] Nate Silver found that the high number of undecided and third-party voters in the election was neglected in many of these models, and that many of these voters decided to vote for Trump.[539] According to a February 2018 study by Public Opinion Quarterly, the main sources of polling error were "a late swing in vote preference toward Trump and a pervasive failure to adjust for over-representation of college graduates (who favored Clinton)," whereas the share of "shy" Trump voters (who declined to admit their support for Trump to the pollsters) proved to be negligible.[540]

FiveThirtyEight's final polls-plus forecast predicted 18 states, plus the second congressional districts of Maine and Nebraska, with an interval of confidence lower than 90%.[541][542] However, every major forecaster, including FiveThirtyEight, the New York Times Upshot, prediction markets aggregator PredictWise, ElectionBettingOdds from Maxim Lott and John Stossel, the DailyKos, the Princeton Election Consortium, the Huffington Post, the Cook Political Report, Larry Sabato's Crystal Ball, and the Rothenberg and Gonzales Report, called every state the same way (although Cook and Rothenberg-Gonzales left two and five states as toss-ups, respectively). The lone exception was Maine's 2nd congressional district. Of the forecasters who published results on the district, the Times gave Trump a 64% chance of winning and PredictWise a 52% chance, FiveThirtyEight gave Clinton a 51% chance of winning in polls-only and 54% in polls-plus, Princeton gave her a 60% chance, Cook labelled it a toss-up, and Sabato leaned it towards Trump.[106] The following table displays the final winning probabilities given by each outlet, along with the final electoral result. The states shown have been identified by Politico,[543] WhipBoard,[544] the New York Times,[545] and the Crystal Ball as battlegrounds.

State New York Times Upshot[545] FiveThirtyEight[545] PredictWise[545] Princeton Election Consortium[545] Sabato's Crystal Ball[545] 2012 margin 2016 margin
Alaska 83% R 76% R 94% R 96% R Likely R 14 R 15 R
Arizona 84% R 67% R 82% R 91% R Lean R 9 R 4 R
Colorado 89% D 78% D 95% D 96% D Likely D 5 D 5 D
Florida 67% D 55% D 77% D 69% D Lean D 1 D 1 R
Georgia 83% R 79% R 91% R 88% R Likely R 8 R 6 R
Iowa 62% R 70% R 79% R 74% R Lean R 6 D 10 R
Maine (statewide) 91% D 83% D 98% D 98% D Likely D 15 D 3 D
Maine (CD-2) 64% R 51% D 52% R 60% D Lean R 9 D 10 R
Michigan 94% D 79% D 95% D 79% D Lean D 9 D 1 R
Minnesota 94% D 85% D 99% D 98% D Likely D 8 D 2 D
Nebraska (CD-2) 80% R 56% R 75% R 92% R Lean R 7 R 3 R
New Mexico 95% D 83% D 98% D 91% D Likely D 10 D 8 D
Nevada 68% D 58% D 91% D 84% D Lean D 7 D 2 D
New Hampshire 79% D 70% D 84% D 63% D Lean D 6 D 1 D
North Carolina 64% D 56% D 66% D 67% D Lean D 2 R 4 R
Ohio 54% R 65% R 67% R 63% R Lean R 3 D 9 R
Pennsylvania 89% D 77% D 93% D 79% D Lean D 5 D 1 R
Utah 73% R 83% R 86% R 99% R Lean R 48 R 18 R
Virginia 96% D 86% D 98% D 98% D Likely D 4 D 5 D
Wisconsin 93% D 84% D 98% D 98% D Likely D 7 D 1 R

Viewership

Post-election events and controversies

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

Trump's victory, considered unlikely by most forecasts,[547][548][549][550][551] was characterized as an "upset" and as "shocking" by the media.[552][553][554][555] Trump himself thought he would lose even as the polls were closing.[556]

Protests

News report about the protests in Los Angeles on November 12 from Voice of America

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

Following the announcement of Trump's election, large protests broke out across the United States with some continuing for several days.[557][558][559][560]

Protesters have held up a number of different signs and chanted various shouts including "Not my president" and "We don't accept the president-elect".[561][557] The movement organized on Twitter under the hashtags #Antitrump and #NotMyPresident.[562][563]

High school and college students walked out of classes to protest.[564] The protests were peaceful for the most part. At some protests fires were lit, flags and other items were burned and people yelled derogatory remarks about Trump. Rioters also broke glass at certain locations.[565][566][567] Celebrities such as Madonna, Cher, and Lady Gaga took part in New York.[568][569][570] Some protesters took to blocking freeways in Los Angeles, San Diego, and Portland, Oregon, and were dispersed by police in the early hours of the morning.[571][572] In a number of cities, protesters were dispersed with rubber bullets, pepper spray and bean-bags fired by police.[573][574][575] In New York City, calls were made to continue the protests over the coming days after the election.[576] Los Angeles mayor Eric Garcetti expressed understanding of the protests and praised those who peacefully wanted to make their voices heard.[577]

Vote tampering concerns

File:How Hard Is It to Hack the US Election - November 5 2016.webm
'How Hard Is It to Hack the US Election' video report from Voice of America, November 5, 2016 (three days before the election)

After the election, computer scientists, including J. Alex Halderman, the director of the University of Michigan Center for Computer Security and Society, urged the Clinton campaign to request an election recount in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania (three swing states where Trump had won narrowly) for the purpose of excluding the possibility that the hacking of electronic voting machines had influenced the recorded outcome.[578][579][580] However, statistician Nate Silver performed a regression analysis which demonstrated that the alleged discrepancy between paper ballots and electronic voting machines "completely disappears once you control for race and education level".[581] On November 25, 2016, the Obama administration said the results from November 8 "accurately reflect the will of the American people".[582] The following day, the White House released another statement, saying: "the federal government did not observe any increased level of malicious cyberactivity aimed at disrupting our electoral process on Election Day."[583]

Donald Trump and New Hampshire governor Chris Sununu both complained that liberal voters from Massachusetts were illegally bused into New Hampshire for the 2016 election, and Scott Brown blamed the same phenomenon for losing his senate race in 2014.[584] The New Hampshire Secretary of State and New Hampshire Department of Justice issued a report in 2018 regarding complaints of voters being bused in from Vermont, Maine, and Massachusetts for the 2016 election. They found that in every case, field inspectors were able to determine that the voters were from New Hampshire, though they were riding a bus operated by an out-of-state company (which has its name and address written on the outside of the bus, presumably the source of the confusion).[584] Out of 743,000 votes cast, four were determined to be cast illegally, either because the voters were told to go to the wrong location, or because the voter believed they were able to vote in each town in which they owned property.[584] Out of about 6,000 same-day voter registrations in the state, the report says only 66 voters could not have their residency confirmed (though fraud is not the only explanation for such a failure).[584]

Recount petitions

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

On November 23, Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein launched a public fundraiser to pay for recounts in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania, asserting that the election's outcome had been affected by hacking in those states; Stein did not provide evidence for her claims.[585][586] Changing the outcome of these three states would make Clinton the winner, and this would require showing that fewer than 60,000 votes had been counted for Trump which should have been counted for Clinton. Stein filed for a recount in Wisconsin on November 25,[587] after which Clinton campaign general counsel Marc Elias said their campaign would join Stein's recount efforts in that state and possibly others "in order to ensure the process proceeds in a manner that is fair to all sides".[400][588] Stein subsequently filed for a recount in Pennsylvania on November 28,[589] and in Michigan on November 30.[590] Concurrently, American Delta Party/Reform Party presidential candidate Rocky De La Fuente sought and was granted a partial recount in Nevada that was unrelated to Stein's efforts.[402]

President-elect Donald Trump issued a statement denouncing Stein's Wisconsin recount request saying, "The people have spoken and the election is over." Trump further commented that the recount "is a scam by the Green Party for an election that has already been conceded".[591] The Trump campaign and Republican Party officials moved to block Stein's three recount efforts through state and federal courts.[592][593]

U.S. District Judge Mark Goldsmith ordered a halt to the recount in Michigan on December 7, dissolving a previous temporary restraining order against the Michigan Board of Elections that allowed the recount to continue, stating in his order: "Plaintiffs have not presented evidence of tampering or mistake. Instead, they present speculative claims going to the vulnerability of the voting machinery—but not actual injury."[594] On December 12, U.S. District Judge Paul Diamond rejected an appeal by the Green Party and Jill Stein to force a recount in Pennsylvania, stating that suspicion of a hacked Pennsylvania election "borders on the irrational" and that granting the Green Party's recount bid could "ensure that no Pennsylvania vote counts" given the December 13, 2016, federal deadline to certify the vote for the Electoral College.[595] Meanwhile, the Wisconsin recount was allowed to continue as it was nearing completion and had uncovered no significant irregularities.[596]

The recounts in Wisconsin and Nevada were completed on schedule, resulting in only minor changes to vote tallies.[597][598] A partial recount of Michigan ballot found some precinct imbalances in Detroit, which were corrected. A subsequent state audit found no evidence of voter fraud and concluded that the mistakes, which were "almost entirely" caused by poll-worker mistakes attributed to poor training, did not impair "the ability of Detroit residents to cast a ballot and have their vote counted".[599] The overall outcome of the election remained unchanged by the recount efforts.[597][598][600]

Electoral College lobbying

Intense lobbying (in one case involving claims of harassment and death threats)[601] and grass-roots campaigns were directed at various GOP electors of the United States Electoral College[602] to convince a sufficient number of them (37) to not vote for Trump, thus precluding a Trump presidency.[603] Members of the Electoral College themselves started a campaign for other members to "vote their conscience for the good of America" in accordance with Alexander Hamilton's Federalist Paper No. 68.[604][605][606][607] This group's members may have become faithless electors in the presidential election.

On December 5, former candidate Lawrence Lessig and attorney Laurence Tribe established The Electors Trust under the aegis of EqualCitizens.US to provide pro bono legal counsel as well as a secure communications platform for members of the Electoral College who were considering a vote of conscience against Trump.[608]

On December 6, Colorado Secretary of State Wayne W. Williams castigated Democratic electors who had filed a lawsuit in Federal court to have the state law binding them to the popular vote (in their case for Hillary Clinton) overturned.[609]

On December 10, ten electors, in an open letter headed by Christine Pelosi to the Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, demanded an intelligence briefing[610][611] in light of Russian interference in the election to help Trump win the presidency.[612] Fifty-eight additional electors subsequently added their names to the letter,[611] bringing the total to 68 electors from 17 different states.[613] On December 16, the briefing request was denied.[614]

On December 19, several electors voted against their pledged candidates: two against Trump and five against Clinton. A further three electors attempted to vote against Clinton but were replaced or forced to vote again.

The 115th United States Congress officially certified the results on January 6, 2017.[615][616]

Faithless electors

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

In the Electoral College vote on December 19, for the first time since 1808, multiple faithless electors voted against their pledged qualified presidential candidate.[lower-alpha 2] Five Democrats rebelled in Washington and Hawaii, while two Republicans rebelled in Texas.[617] Two Democratic electors, one in Minnesota and one in Colorado, were replaced after voting for Bernie Sanders and John Kasich, respectively.[618][619] Electors in Maine conducted a second vote after one of its members voted for Sanders; the elector then voted for Clinton.[620]

Likewise, for the first time since 1896,[lower-alpha 3] multiple faithless electors voted against the pledged qualified vice presidential candidate.

  • One Clinton elector in Colorado attempted to vote for John Kasich.[621] The single vote was ruled invalid by Colorado state law, the elector was dismissed, and an alternative elector was sworn in who voted for Clinton.[622][619]
  • One Clinton elector in Minnesota voted for Bernie Sanders as president and Tulsi Gabbard as vice president; his votes were discarded and he was replaced by an alternate who voted for Clinton.[622]
  • One Clinton elector in Maine voted for Bernie Sanders; this vote was invalidated as "improper" and the elector subsequently voted for Clinton.[622]
  • Four Clinton electors in Washington did not vote for Clinton (three votes went to Colin Powell, and one to Faith Spotted Eagle).[623]
  • One Trump elector in Georgia resigned before the vote rather than vote for Trump and was replaced by an alternate.[624]
  • Two Trump electors in Texas did not vote for Trump (one vote went to John Kasich, one to Ron Paul); one elector did not vote for Pence and instead voted for Carly Fiorina for vice-president; a third resigned before the vote rather than vote for Trump and was replaced by an alternate.[623]
  • One Clinton elector in Hawaii voted for Bernie Sanders.[625]

Of the faithless votes, Colin Powell and Elizabeth Warren were the only two to receive more than one; Powell received three electoral votes for president and Warren received two for vice president. Receiving one valid electoral vote each were Sanders, John Kasich, Ron Paul and Faith Spotted Eagle for president, and Carly Fiorina, Susan Collins, Winona LaDuke and Maria Cantwell for vice president. Sanders is the first Jewish American to receive an electoral vote for president. LaDuke is the first Green Party member to receive an electoral vote, and Paul is the third member of the Libertarian Party to do so, following the party's presidential and vice-presidential nominees each getting one vote in 1972. It is the first election with faithless electors from more than one political party. The seven people to receive electoral votes for president were the most in a single election since 1796, and more than any other election since the enactment of the Twelfth Amendment in 1804.

State Party Presidential vote Vice presidential vote Name of Elector References
Nationwide Donald Trump, 304 Mike Pence, 305 Pledged
Hillary Clinton, 227 Tim Kaine, 227
Hawaii Bernie Sanders (I-VT) Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) David Mulinix [626]
Texas John Kasich (R-OH) Carly Fiorina (R-VA) Christopher Suprun [627][628]
Ron Paul (L-TX / R-TX) Mike Pence (as pledged) Bill Greene [627][561]
Washington Colin Powell (R-VA)[632] Maria Cantwell (D-WA) Levi Guerra [633][634]
Susan Collins (R-ME) Esther John [106][633]
Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) Bret Chiafalo [106][633]
Faith Spotted Eagle (D-SD)[635] Winona LaDuke (G-MN) Robert Satiacum, Jr. [106][633][636]

See also

Notes

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Maine split its electoral votes for the first time since 1828.[458]
  2. The 1872 presidential election also saw multiple electors vote for a different candidate than that pledged, due to the death of Liberal Republican candidate Horace Greeley, after the popular vote, yet before the meeting of the Electoral College. Greeley still garnered three posthumous electoral votes which were subsequently dismissed by Congress.
  3. Not including 1912, because of the death of James S. Sherman.

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 (Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.) (Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.)
  2. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  3. Becker, Bernie (February 13, 2016). "Trump's six populist positions". Politico. Retrieved March 8, 2018.
  4. Nicholas Confessore & Karen Yourish, "Measuring Donald Trump's Mammoth Advantage in Free Media", The New York Times (March 16, 2016).
  5. Walsh, Kenneth. "How Donald Trump's Media Dominance Is Changing the 2016 Campaign". US News & World Report. Archived from the original on February 25, 2016. Retrieved February 17, 2016.
  6. Chozick, Amy (March 4, 2016). "Clinton Offers Economic Plan Focused on Jobs". The New York Times. Retrieved March 8, 2018.
  7. Wallace, Gregory (November 8, 2016). "Negative ads dominate in campaign's final days". CNN. Retrieved March 8, 2018.
  8. Cassidy, John (November 5, 2016). "Closing Arguments: The Logic of Negative Campaigning". The New Yorker. Retrieved March 8, 2018. "This Presidential campaign has been the most bitter in recent American history."
  9. Pew Research Center (November 21, 2016). "Voters' evaluations of the campaign: Campaign viewed as heavy on negative campaigning, light on issues". Retrieved March 8, 2018
  10. Tiefenthaler, Ainara (March 14, 2016). "Trump's History of Encouraging Violence". The New York Times. Retrieved November 8, 2016.
  11. Nguyen, Tina (March 11, 2016). "Donald Trump's Rallies Are Becoming Increasingly Violent". Vanity Fair. Retrieved March 12, 2016.
  12. Jacobs, Ben (March 11, 2016). "Trump campaign dogged by violent incidents at rallies". The Guardian. Retrieved March 12, 2016.
  13. Gallup News (July 25, 2016). "Clinton's Image at Lowest Point in Two Decades". Retrieved March 8, 2018.
  14. McCarthy, Justin (July 1, 2016). "Americans' Reactions to Trump, Clinton Explain Poor Images". Gallup News. Retrieved August 20, 2019.
  15. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  16. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  17. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  18. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  19. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  20. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  21. Moore, John L., ed. (1985). Congressional Quarterly's Guide to U.S. Elections (2nd ed.). Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly, Inc. p. 266.
  22. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  23. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  24. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  25. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  26. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  27. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  28. Mueller Report, vol I
  29. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  30. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  31. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  32. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  33. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  34. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  35. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  36. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  37. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  38. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  39. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  40. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  41. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  42. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  43. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  44. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  45. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  46. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  47. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  48. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  49. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  50. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  51. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  52. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  53. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  54. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  55. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  56. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  57. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  58. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  59. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  60. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  61. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  62. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  63. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  64. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  65. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  66. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  67. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  68. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  69. Jaffe, Alexandra (June 1, 2015) "Graham bets on foreign experience in White House bid announcement", CNN. Retrieved June 1, 2015.
  70. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  71. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  72. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  73. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  74. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  75. 75.0 75.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  76. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  77. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  78. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  79. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  80. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  81. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  82. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  83. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  84. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  85. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  86. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  87. 87.0 87.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  88. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  89. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  90. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  91. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  92. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  93. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  94. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  95. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  96. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  97. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  98. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  99. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  100. 100.0 100.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  101. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  102. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  103. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  104. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  105. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  106. 106.0 106.1 106.2 106.3 106.4 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  107. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  108. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  109. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  110. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  111. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  112. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  113. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  114. Yglesias, Matthew (February 1, 2016) "Iowa Results: Martin O'Malley drops out after third-place finish", Vox.com. Retrieved February 1, 2016.
  115. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  116. Merica, Dan; LoBianco, Tom (October 23, 2015) "Lincoln Chafee drops out of Democratic primary race", CNN.com. Retrieved October 23, 2015
  117. Walsh, Michael (October 20, 2015) "Jim Webb drops out of Democratic primary race", Yahoo! Politics. Retrieved October 23, 2015.
  118. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  119. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  120. 120.0 120.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  121. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  122. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  123. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  124. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  125. 125.0 125.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  126. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  127. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  128. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  129. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  130. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  131. 131.0 131.1 131.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  132. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  133. 133.0 133.1 133.2 133.3 133.4 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  134. 134.0 134.1 134.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  135. 135.00 135.01 135.02 135.03 135.04 135.05 135.06 135.07 135.08 135.09 135.10 135.11 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  136. 136.0 136.1 136.2 136.3 136.4 136.5 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  137. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  138. 138.0 138.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  139. 139.0 139.1 139.2 139.3 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  140. 140.0 140.1 140.2 140.3 140.4 140.5 140.6 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  141. 141.0 141.1 141.2 141.3 141.4 141.5 141.6 141.7 141.8 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named KS
  142. 142.0 142.1 142.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  143. 143.0 143.1 143.2 143.3 143.4 143.5 143.6 143.7 143.8 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named NY
  144. 144.0 144.1 144.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  145. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  146. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  147. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  148. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  149. 149.00 149.01 149.02 149.03 149.04 149.05 149.06 149.07 149.08 149.09 149.10 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  150. 150.0 150.1 150.2 150.3 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  151. 151.00 151.01 151.02 151.03 151.04 151.05 151.06 151.07 151.08 151.09 151.10 151.11 151.12 151.13 151.14 151.15 151.16 151.17 151.18 151.19 151.20 151.21 151.22 151.23 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named BAN_write-in
  152. 152.0 152.1 152.2 152.3 152.4 152.5 152.6 152.7 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named DE
  153. 153.00 153.01 153.02 153.03 153.04 153.05 153.06 153.07 153.08 153.09 153.10 153.11 153.12 153.13 153.14 153.15 153.16 153.17 153.18 153.19 153.20 153.21 153.22 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named OR_write-in
  154. 154.0 154.1 154.2 154.3 154.4 154.5 154.6 154.7 154.8 154.9 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  155. 155.00 155.01 155.02 155.03 155.04 155.05 155.06 155.07 155.08 155.09 155.10 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  156. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  157. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  158. 158.0 158.1 158.2 158.3 158.4 158.5 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named IN
  159. 159.0 159.1 159.2 159.3 159.4 159.5 159.6 159.7 159.8 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  160. 160.0 160.1 160.2 160.3 160.4 160.5 160.6 160.7 160.8 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  161. 161.0 161.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  162. 162.0 162.1 162.2 162.3 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  163. 163.0 163.1 163.2 163.3 163.4 163.5 163.6 163.7 163.8 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  164. 164.0 164.1 164.2 164.3 164.4 164.5 164.6 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  165. 165.0 165.1 165.2 165.3 165.4 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  166. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  167. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  168. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  169. 169.0 169.1 169.2 169.3 169.4 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  170. 170.0 170.1 170.2 170.3 170.4 170.5 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  171. 171.0 171.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  172. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  173. 173.0 173.1 173.2 173.3 173.4 173.5 173.6 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  174. 174.0 174.1 174.2 174.3 174.4 174.5 174.6 174.7 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  175. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  176. 176.0 176.1 176.2 176.3 176.4 176.5 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named NE
  177. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  178. 178.0 178.1 178.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  179. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  180. 180.0 180.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  181. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  182. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  183. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  184. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  185. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  186. 186.0 186.1 186.2 186.3 186.4 186.5 186.6 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  187. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  188. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  189. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  190. 190.0 190.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  191. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  192. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  193. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  194. 194.0 194.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  195. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  196. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  197. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  198. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  199. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  200. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  201. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  202. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  203. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  204. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  205. Nate Cohn, Donald Trump's Strongest Supporters: A Certain Kind of Democrat, The New York Times (December 31, 2015).
  206. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  207. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  208. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  209. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  210. Nicholas Confessore & Karen Yourish, Measuring Donald Trump's Mammoth Advantage in Free Media, The New York Times (March 16, 2016).
  211. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  212. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  213. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  214. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  215. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  216. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  217. Walsh, Kenneth. "Trump: Media Is 'Dishonest and Corrupt'" Archived September 16, 2016, at the Wayback Machine, U.S. News and World Report (August 15, 2016).
  218. Koppel, Ted. "Trump: 'I feel I'm an honest person'", CBS News (July 24, 2016).
  219. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  220. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  221. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  222. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  223. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  224. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  225. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  226. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  227. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  228. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  229. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  230. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  231. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  232. 232.0 232.1 232.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  233. 233.0 233.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  234. Cassidy, John, A Sexual Predator in the Republican Party's Midst, The New Yorker, October 8, 2016.
  235. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  236. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  237. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  238. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  239. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  240. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  241. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  242. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  243. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  244. Benjy Sarlin, Anti-Trump forces have few options for third party alternative, MSNBC (March 4, 2016): "'I am the third party,' former New Mexico Gov. Gary Johnson, the party's 2012 nominee, told conservative gathering CPAC on Thursday. 'The Libertarian Party will be on the ballot in all 50 states.'"
  245. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  246. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  247. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  248. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  249. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  250. 250.0 250.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  251. 251.0 251.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  252. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  253. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  254. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  255. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  256. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  257. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  258. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  259. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  260. 260.0 260.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  261. 261.0 261.1 261.2 261.3 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  262. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  263. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  264. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  265. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  266. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  267. Winger, Richard (August 2, 2015) "Green Party Will Hold Presidential Convention in Houston", Ballot Access News. Retrieved August 5, 2015.
  268. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  269. Mills, Glen (April 14, 2016) "The Constitution Party hosts national convention in Salt Lake City", Good4Utah. Retrieved September 14, 2016.
  270. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  271. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  272. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  273. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  274. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  275. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  276. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  277. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  278. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  279. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  280. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  281. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  282. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  283. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  284. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  285. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  286. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  287. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  288. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  289. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  290. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  291. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  292. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  293. 293.0 293.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  294. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  295. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  296. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  297. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  298. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  299. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  300. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  301. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  302. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  303. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  304. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  305. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  306. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  307. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  308. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  309. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  310. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  311. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  312. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  313. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  314. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  315. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  316. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  317. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  318. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  319. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  320. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  321. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  322. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  323. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  324. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  325. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  326. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  327. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  328. Mueller Report, vol. I, p. 4: At the same time that the IRA operation began to focus on supporting candidate Trump in early 2016, the Russian government employed a second form of interference: cyber intrusions (hacking) and releases of hacked materials damaging to the Clinton Campaign. The Russian intelligence service known as the Main Intelligence Directorate of the General Staff of the Russian Army (GRU) carried out these operations. In March 2016, the GRU began hacking the email accounts of Clinton Campaign volunteers and employees, including campaign chairman John Podesta. In April 2016, the GRU hacked into the computer networks of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) and the Democratic National Committee (DNC). The GRU stole hundreds of thousands of documents from the compromised email accounts and networks. Around the time that the DNC announced in mid-June 2016 the Russian government's role in hacking its network, the GRU began disseminating stolen materials through the fictitious online personas "DCLeaks" and "Guccifer 2.0." The GRU later released additional materials through the organization WikiLeaks.
  329. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  330. Mueller Report, vol. I, p. 2: In evaluating whether evidence about the collective action of multiple individuals constituted a crime, we applied the framework of conspiracy law, not the concept of "collusion." In so doing, the Office recognized that the word "collud[e]" was used in communications with the Acting Attorney General confirming certain aspects of the investigation's scope and that the term has frequently been invoked in public reporting about the investigation. But collusion is not a specific offense or theory of liability found in the United States Code, nor is it a term of art in federal criminal law. For those reasons, the Office's focus in analyzing questions of joint criminal liability was on conspiracy as defined in federal law.
  331. Mueller Report, vol. I, p. 2: In connection with that analysis, we addressed the factual question of whether members of the Trump Campaign "coordinat[ed]"—a term that appears in the appointment order—with Russian election interference activities. Like collusion, "coordination" does not have a settled definition in federal criminal law. We understood coordination to require an agreement—tacit or express—between the Trump Campaign and the Russian government on election interference. That requires more than the two parties taking actions that were informed by or responsive to the other's actions or interests. We applied the term coordination in that sense when stating in the report that the investigation did not establish that the Trump campaign coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.
  332. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  333. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  334. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  335. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  336. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  337. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  338. 338.0 338.1 338.2 338.3 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  339. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  340. Is This House Finch Feeling The Bern?. Audubon.
  341. 341.0 341.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  342. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  343. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  344. 344.0 344.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  345. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  346. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  347. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  348. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  349. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  350. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  351. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  352. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  353. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  354. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  355. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  356. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  357. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  358. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  359. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  360. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  361. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  362. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  363. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  364. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  365. "The Commission on Presidential Debates: An Overview" Archived September 26, 2016, at the Wayback Machine, Debates.org.
  366. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  367. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  368. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  369. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  370. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  371. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  372. 372.0 372.1 372.2 372.3 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  373. Lloyd Gruber, "How political scientists got Trump exactly wrong." USApp–American Politics and Policy Blog (01 Jun 2016)
  374. Fred Andrew Wright and Alec Aidan Wright, "How Surprising Was Trump's Victory? Notes on Predictions in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election" (January 16, 2017). online at SSRN
  375. 375.0 375.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  376. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  377. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  378. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  379. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  380. 380.0 380.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  381. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  382. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  383. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  384. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  385. 385.0 385.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  386. U.S. Census Bureau. (2016). Population clock. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/popclock/
  387. 387.0 387.1 387.2 387.3 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  388. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  389. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  390. CA: [1] and [2] NH: [3] VT: [4]
  391. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.[unreliable source?]
  392. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  393. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  394. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  395. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  396. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  397. Angst over the economy helps Trump flip Great Lakes states, Chicago Tribune, November 9, 2016.
  398. Donald Trump's Promise of Bringing Back Jobs Worked With Many Michigan Voters, The Wall Street Journal, November 9, 2016.
  399. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  400. 400.0 400.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  401. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  402. 402.0 402.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  403. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  404. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  405. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.[permanent dead link]
  406. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  407. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  408. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  409. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  410. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  411. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  412. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  413. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  414. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  415. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  416. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  417. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  418. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  419. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  420. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  421. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  422. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  423. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  424. 424.0 424.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  425. 425.0 425.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  426. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  427. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  428. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  429. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  430. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  431. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  432. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  433. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  434. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  435. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  436. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  437. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  438. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  439. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  440. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  441. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  442. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  443. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  444. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  445. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  446. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  447. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  448. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  449. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  450. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  451. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  452. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  453. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  454. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  455. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  456. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  457. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  458. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  459. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  460. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  461. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  462. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  463. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  464. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  465. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  466. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  467. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  468. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  469. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  470. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  471. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  472. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  473. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  474. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  475. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  476. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  477. 477.0 477.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  478. 478.0 478.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  479. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  480. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  481. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  482. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  483. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  484. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  485. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  486. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  487. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  488. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  489. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  490. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  491. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  492. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  493. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  494. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  495. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  496. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  497. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  498. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  499. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  500. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  501. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  502. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  503. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  504. 504.0 504.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  505. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  506. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  507. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  508. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  509. Sabato, Larry J. "The 2016 Election that Broke All, or At Least Most, of the Rules", in Trumped: The 2016 Election That Broke All the Rules, ed. Larry Sabato, Kyle Kondik, Geoffrey Skelley. Rowman & Littlefield (2017), p. 10. ISBN 9781442279407
  510. Matt Barreto, Thomas Schaller, and Gary Segura. "Latinos and the 2016 Election," in Trumped: The 2016 Election That Broke All the Rules, ed. Larry Sabato, Kyle Kondik, Geoffrey Skelley. Rowman & Littlefield (2017), pp.123–35. ISBN 9781442279407
  511. Skelley, Geoffrey (March 23, 2017). "Another Look Back at 2016: Comparing the exit poll and the Cooperative Congressional Election Study", Sabato's Crystal Ball. Retrieved March 8, 2018.
  512. Hansi Lo Wang (April 18, 2017). "Trump Lost More Of The Asian-American Vote Than The National Exit Polls Showed", NPR. Retrieved March 8, 2018.
  513. Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund, "The Asian-American Vote 2016" Archived July 18, 2018, at the Wayback Machine, p.13. Retrieved March 8, 2018.
  514. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  515. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  516. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  517. 517.0 517.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  518. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  519. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  520. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  521. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  522. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  523. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  524. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  525. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  526. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  527. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  528. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  529. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  530. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  531. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  532. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  533. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  534. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  535. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  536. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  537. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  538. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  539. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  540. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  541. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  542. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  543. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  544. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  545. 545.0 545.1 545.2 545.3 545.4 545.5 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  546. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  547. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  548. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  549. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  550. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  551. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  552. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  553. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  554. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  555. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  556. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  557. 557.0 557.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  558. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  559. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  560. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  561. 561.0 561.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  562. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  563. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  564. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  565. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  566. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  567. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  568. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  569. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  570. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  571. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  572. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  573. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  574. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  575. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  576. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  577. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  578. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  579. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  580. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  581. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  582. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  583. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  584. 584.0 584.1 584.2 584.3 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  585. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  586. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  587. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  588. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  589. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  590. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  591. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  592. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  593. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  594. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  595. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  596. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  597. 597.0 597.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  598. 598.0 598.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  599. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  600. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  601. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  602. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  603. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  604. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  605. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  606. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  607. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  608. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  609. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  610. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  611. 611.0 611.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  612. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  613. Pete Williams, Coming Soon: The 'Real' Presidential Election, NBC News (December 15, 2016).
  614. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  615. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  616. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  617. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  618. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  619. 619.0 619.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  620. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  621. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  622. 622.0 622.1 622.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  623. 623.0 623.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  624. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  625. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  626. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  627. 627.0 627.1 Sean Collins Walsh, "All but two Texas members of the Electoral College choose Donald Trump," Statesman.com (December 19, 2016).
  628. Texas electors cast 36 votes for Trump, one for Kasich, one for Ron Paul. Texas Tribune (December 19, 2016). Retrieved December 19, 2016.
  629. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  630. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  631. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  632. Powell has several homes, including one in NYC (still)[629] and also one in DC, but is officially a VA resident per WikiLeaks emails,[630] and per his 'verified' social media account.[631]
  633. 633.0 633.1 633.2 633.3 Rachel la Corte, "Four Washington state electors to be fined $1,000 for vote", bigstory.ap.org (December 22, 2016).
  634. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  635. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  636. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

Further reading

  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

External links

Script error: The function "top" does not exist.

Script error: The function "bottom" does not exist.