Nuclear-powered aircraft

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
(Redirected from Atomic plane)
Jump to: navigation, search

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

A nuclear-powered aircraft is an aircraft that is powered by nuclear energy. During the Cold War, the United States and Soviet Union researched nuclear-powered bomber aircraft, the greater endurance of which could enhance nuclear deterrence, but neither country created any such operational aircraft. One inadequately solved design problem was the need for heavy shielding to protect the crew from acute radiation syndrome. The advent of ICBMs in the 1960s greatly diminished the tactical advantage of such aircraft, and respective projects were cancelled; the inherent danger of the technology has prevented its civilian use.

Some unmanned missile designs include nuclear thermal rockets.

The only US aircraft to carry a nuclear reactor was the NB-36H. The program was canceled in 1958

U.S. programs

NEPA and ANP

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

In May 1946, the United States Army Air Forces started the Nuclear Energy for the Propulsion of Aircraft (NEPA) project, which conducted studies until the Aircraft Nuclear Propulsion (ANP) program replaced NEPA in 1951. The ANP program included provisions for studying two different types of nuclear-powered jet engines: General Electric's Direct Air Cycle and Pratt & Whitney's Indirect Air Cycle. ANP planned for Convair to modify two B-36s under the MX-1589 project. One of the B-36s, the NB-36H, was to be used for studying shielding requirements for an airborne reactor, while the other was to be the X-6; however, the program was cancelled before the X-6 was completed.

The first operation of a nuclear aircraft engine occurred on January 31, 1956 using a modified General Electric J47 turbojet engine.[1] The Aircraft Nuclear Propulsion program was terminated after the President's annual budget message to Congress in 1961.

The Oak Ridge National Laboratory researched and developed (Aircraft Reactor Experiment) nuclear aircraft engines. Two shielded reactors powered two General Electric J87 turbojet engines to nearly full thrust. Two experimental engines complete with reactor system, (HTRE 3 and HTRE 1) are at the EBR-1 facility south of the Idaho National Laboratory Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found..

Experimental HTRE reactors for nuclear aircraft, (HTRE 3 left and HTRE 1 right) on display at Idaho National Laboratory near Arco, Idaho (Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.).

The U.S. designed these engines for use in a new, specially-designed nuclear bomber, the WS-125. Although Eisenhower eventually terminated it by cutting NEPA and telling Congress that the program was not urgent, he backed a small program for developing high temperature materials and high performance reactors; that program was terminated early in the Kennedy administration.

Project Pluto

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

In 1957, the Air Force and the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission contracted with the Lawrence Radiation Laboratory to study the feasibility of applying heat from nuclear reactors to ramjet engines. This research became known as Project Pluto. This program was to provide engines for an unmanned cruise missile, called SLAM, for Supersonic Low Altitude Missile. The program succeeded in producing two test engines, which were operated on the ground. On May 14, 1961, the world's first nuclear ramjet engine, "Tory-IIA," mounted on a railroad car, roared to life for just a few seconds. On July 1, 1964, seven years and six months after it was born, "Project Pluto" was cancelled.

Soviet programs

Soviet nuclear bomber hoax

The 1 December 1958 issue of Aviation Week included an article, Soviets Flight Testing Nuclear Bomber, that claimed that the Soviets had greatly progressed a nuclear aircraft program:[2] "[a] nuclear-powered bomber is being flight tested in the Soviet Union. Completed about six months ago, this aircraft has been flying in the Moscow area for at least two months. It has been observed both in flight and on the ground by a wide variety of foreign observers from Communist and non-Communist countries." Unlike the US designs of the same era, which were purely experimental, the article noted that "The Soviet aircraft is a prototype of a design to perform a military mission as a continuous airborne alert warning system and missile launching platform." Photographs illustrated the article, along with technical diagrams on the proposed layout; these were so widely seen that one company produced a plastic model aircraft,[3] a surprisingly faithful rendition of the diagrams in the article. An editorial on the topic accompanied the article.

Concerns were soon expressed in Washington that "the Russians were from three to five years ahead of the US in the field of atomic aircraft engines and that they would move even further ahead unless the US pressed forward with its own program".[4] These concerns caused continued but temporary funding of the US's own program.

The aircraft in the photographs was later revealed to be the entirely conventional Myasishchev M-50 Bounder, a medium-range strategic bomber that performed like the USAFs B-58 Hustler. The design was considered a failure, never entered service, and was revealed to the public on Soviet Aviation Day in 1963 at Monino, putting the issue to rest.[5]

Tupolev Tu-119

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

The Soviet program of nuclear aircraft development resulted in the experimental Tupolev Tu-119, or the Tu-95LAL (LAL- Летающая Атомная Лаборатория- Flying Nuclear Laboratory) which derived from the Tupolev Tu-95 bomber. It had 4 conventional turboprop engines and an onboard nuclear reactor. The Tu-119 completed 34 research flights, most of which were made with the reactor shut down. The main purpose of the flight phase was examining the effectiveness of the radiation shielding, which was one of the main concerns for the engineers. Massive protection so reduced radiation levels that development could continue, but, as in the US, it ceased. The obvious potential of the ICBM made the expensive program superfluous, and around the mid-1960s it was cancelled.

Several other projects only reached the design phase.[6][7]

See also

References

Citations

  1. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  2. Soviets Flight Testing Nuclear Bomber, Aviation Week, 1 December 1958, p. 27.
  3. AURORA 128 Russian Nuclear Bomber (1959)
  4. Soviet Nuclear Plane Possibility Conceded, Ford Eastman, Aviation Week, 19 January 1959, p. 29.
  5. AURORA Russian Nuclear Bomber : the Sources
  6. Buttler & Gordon 2004, pp. 78–83
  7. Colon 2009

Bibliography

  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

External links