Bacterial vaginosis

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
(Redirected from Bacterial Vaginosis)
Jump to: navigation, search
Bacterial vaginosis
File:Vaginose-G15.jpg
Micrograph of bacterial vaginosis — cells of the cervix covered with rod-shaped bacteria, Gardnerella vaginalis (arrows).
Classification and external resources
Specialty Gynecology, infectious disease
ICD-10 B96, N76
ICD-9-CM 616.1
Patient UK Bacterial vaginosis
MeSH D016585
[[[d:Lua error in Module:Wikidata at line 863: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).|edit on Wikidata]]]

Bacterial vaginosis (BV), also known as vaginal bacteriosis or Gardnerella vaginitis,[1] is a disease of the vagina caused by excessive growth of bacteria.[2][3] Common symptoms include increased vaginal discharge that often smells like fish. The discharge is usually white or gray in color. Burning with urination may occur.[4] Itching is uncommon.[2][4] Occasionally there may be no symptoms.[4] Having BV increases the risk of infection by a number of other sexually transmitted infections including HIV/AIDS.[5] It also increases the risk of early delivery among pregnant women.[6][7]

BV is caused by an imbalance of the naturally occurring bacteria in the vagina.[8] There is a change in the most common type of bacteria and a hundred to thousandfold increase in total numbers of bacteria present.[2] Typically bacteria other than Lactobaccili become more common.[9] Risk factors include douching, new or multiple sex partners, antibiotics, and using an intrauterine device among others.[8] However, it is not considered a sexually transmitted infection.[10] Diagnosis is suspected based on the symptoms and may be verified by testing the vaginal discharge and finding a higher than normal vaginal pH and large numbers of bacteria.[2] BV is often confused with a vaginal yeast infection or infection with Trichomonas.[11]

Usually treatment is with an antibiotic, such as clindamycin or metronidazole. These medications may also be used in the second or third trimesters of pregnancy. However, the condition often recurs following treatment. Probiotics may help prevent re-occurrence.[2] It is unclear if the use of probiotics or antibiotics affects pregnancy outcomes.[2][12]

BV is the most common vaginal infection in women of reproductive age.[8] The percentage of women affected at any given time varies between 5% and 70%.[5] BV is most common in parts of Africa and least common in Asia and Europe.[5] In the United States about 30% of women between the ages of 14 and 49 are affected.[13] Rates vary considerably between ethnic groups within a country.[5] While BV like symptoms have been described for much of recorded history, the first clearly documented case occurred in 1894.[1]

Signs and symptoms

Common symptoms include increased vaginal discharge that usually smells like fish. The discharge is often white or gray in color. There may be burning with urination. Occasionally there may be no symptoms.[4]

The discharge coats the walls of the vagina, and is usually without significant irritation, pain, or erythema (redness), although mild itching can sometimes occur. By contrast, the normal vaginal discharge will vary in consistency and amount throughout the menstrual cycle and is at its clearest at ovulation—about 2 weeks before the period starts. Some practitioners claim that BV can be asymptomatic in almost half of affected women,[14] though others argue that this is often a misdiagnosis.[15]

Causes

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

Healthy vaginal microbiota consists of species which do not cause symptoms, infections, or negatively affect pregnancy. It is dominated mainly by Lactobacillus species.[16][9] BV is defined by the disequilibrium in the vaginal microbiota with decline in the number of lactobacilli. While the infection involves a number of bacteria, it is believed that most infections start with Gardnerella vaginalis creating a biofilm which allows other opportunistic bacteria to thrive.[3][17]

One of the main risks for developing BV is douching, which alters the vaginal flora and predisposes women to developing BV.[18] Douching is strongly discouraged by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and various medical authorities, for this and other reasons.[18]

BV is a risk factor for pelvic inflammatory disease, HIV, sexually transmitted infections (STIs), and reproductive and obstetric disorders or negative outcomes. It is possible for sexually inactive persons to develop bacterial vaginosis.[3]

Bacterial vaginosis may sometimes affect women after menopause. Subclinical iron deficiency may correlate with bacterial vaginosis in early pregnancy.[19] A longitudinal study published in February 2006 in the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology showed a link between psychosocial stress and bacterial vaginosis persisted even when other risk factors were taken into account.[20] Exposure to the spermicide nonoxynol-9 does not affect the risk of developing bacterial vaginosis.[21]

Having a female partner increases the risk of BV by 60%. The bacteria associated with BV have been isolated from male genitalia. BV microbiota have been found in the penis, coronal sulcus, and male urethra, in the male partners of infected females. Those uncircumcised partners may act as a ‘reservoir’ increasing the likelihood of acquiring an infection after sexual intercourse. Another mode of transmission of BV associated microbiota is to a female sexual partner via the skin-to-skin transfer. BV may be transmitted via the perineal enteric bacteria from the microbiota of the female and male genitalia.[22]

Diagnosis

File:Bacterial vaginosis workup.jpg
A pH indicator to detect vaginal alkalinization (here showing approximately pH 8), and a microscope slide to microscopically detect clue cells.

To make a diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis, a swab from inside the vagina should be obtained. These swabs should be tested for:

  • A characteristic "fishy" odor on wet mount. This test, called the whiff test, is performed by adding a small amount of potassium hydroxide to a microscopic slide containing the vaginal discharge. A characteristic fishy odor is considered a positive whiff test and is suggestive of bacterial vaginosis.
  • Loss of acidity. To control bacterial growth, the vagina is normally slightly acidic with a pH of 3.8–4.2. A swab of the discharge is put onto litmus paper to check its acidity. A pH greater than 4.5 is considered alkaline and is suggestive of bacterial vaginosis.
  • The presence of clue cells on wet mount. Similar to the whiff test, the test for clue cells is performed by placing a drop of sodium chloride solution on a slide containing vaginal discharge. If present, clue cells can be visualized under a microscope. They are so-named because they give a clue to the reason behind the discharge. These are epithelial cells that are coated with bacteria.

Two positive results in addition to the discharge itself are enough to diagnose BV. If there is no discharge, then all three criteria are needed.[23][non-primary source needed] Differential diagnosis for bacterial vaginosis includes the following:[24]

The Center For Disease Control (CDC) defines STIs as "a variety of clinical syndromes and infections caused by pathogens that can be acquired and transmitted through sexual activity."[25] But the CDC does not specifically identify BV as sexually transmitted infection.[10]

Amsel criteria

In clinical practice BV can be diagnosed using the Amsel criteria:[23]

  1. Thin, white, yellow, homogeneous discharge
  2. Clue cells on microscopy
  3. pH of vaginal fluid >4.5
  4. Release of a fishy odor on adding alkali—10% potassium hydroxide (KOH) solution.

At least three of the four criteria should be present for a confirmed diagnosis.[26] A modification of the Amsel criteria accepts the presence of two instead of three factors, and is considered equally diagnostic.

Gram stain

An alternative is to use a Gram-stained vaginal smear, with the Hay/Ison[27] criteria or the Nugent[28] criteria. The Hay/Ison criteria are defined as follows:[26]

  • Grade 1 (Normal): Lactobacillus morphotypes predominate.
  • Grade 2 (Intermediate): Mixed flora with some Lactobacilli present, but Gardnerella or Mobiluncus morphotypes also present.
  • Grade 3 (Bacterial Vaginosis): Predominantly Gardnerella and/or Mobiluncus morphotypes. Few or absent Lactobacilli. (Hay et al., 1994)

Gardnerella vaginalis is the main culprit in BV. Gardnerella vaginalis is a short rod (coccobacillus). Hence, the presence of clue cells and gram variable coccobacilli are indicative or diagnostic of bacterial vaginosis.

The standards for research are the Nugent criteria.[28] In this scale, a score of 0-10 is generated from combining three other scores. This method is time consuming and requires trained staff, but it has high interobserver reliability.[citation needed] The scores are as follows:

  • 0–3 is considered negative for BV
  • 4–6 is considered intermediate
  • 7+ is considered indicative of BV.

At least 10–20 high power (1000× oil immersion) fields are counted and an average determined.

Lactobacillus morphotypes — average per high powered (1000× oil immersion) field. View multiple fields.

Gardnerella / Bacteroides morphotypes — average per high powered (1000× oil immersion) field. View multiple fields.

Curved Gram variable rods — average per high powered (1000× oil immersion) field. View multiple fields (note that this factor is less important — scores of only 0–2 are possible)

  • Score 0 for >30
  • Score 1 for 15–30
  • Score 2 for 14
  • Score 3 for <1 (this is an average, so results can be >0, yet <1)
  • Score 4 for 0
  • Score 0 for 0
  • Score 1 for <1 (this is an average, so results can be >0, yet <1)
  • Score 2 for 1–4
  • Score 3 for 5–30
  • Score 4 for >30
  • Score 0 for 0
  • Score 1 for <5
  • Score 2 for 5+

DNA hybridization testing with Affirm VPIII was compared to the Gram stain using the Nugent criteria.[29] The Affirm VPIII test may be used for the rapid diagnosis of BV in symptomatic women but uses expensive proprietary equipment to read results, and does not detect other pathogens that cause BV, including Prevotella spp, Bacteroides spp, & Mobiluncus spp.

Prevention

Some steps suggested to lower the risk include: not douching, avoiding sex, or limiting the number of sex partners.[30]

One review concluded that probiotics may help prevent re-occurrence.[2] Another review found that while there is tentative evidence it is not strong enough to recommend their use for this purpose.[31]

Antibiotic treatment of male partners could re-establish the normal microbiota of the male uro-genital tract. BV associated bacteria in or on the male genitals may promote relapse, reinfection of, women with BV. Treating the male partner is an effective and safe intervention and offers the advantage of preventing the recurrence of infection.[22]

Treatment

Antibiotics

Treatment is typically with the antibiotics metronidazole or clindamycin.[32] They can be either given by mouth or applied inside the vagina.[32] About 10% to 15% of people; however, do not improve with the first course of antibiotics and recurrence rates of up to 80% have been documented.[33] Recurrence rates are increased with sexual activity with the same pre-/posttreatment partner and inconsistent condom use although estrogen-containing contraceptives decrease recurrence.[34] When clindamycin is given to pregnant women symptomatic with BV before 22 weeks of gestation the risk of pre-term birth before 37 weeks of gestation is lower.[35]

Other antibiotics that may work include macrolides, lincosamides, nitroimidazoles, and penicillins.[22]

Bacterial vaginosis is not considered a sexually transmitted infection, and treatment of a male sexual partner of a woman with bacterial vaginosis is not recommended.[36][37]

Probiotics

A 2009 Cochrane review found tentative but insufficient evidence for probiotics as a treatment for BV.[38] A 2014 review reached the same conclusion.[39] A 2013 review found some evidence supporting the use of probiotics during pregnancy.[40]

Complications

Although previously considered a mere nuisance infection, untreated bacterial vaginosis may cause complications, such as increased susceptibility to sexually transmitted infections including HIV and pregnancy complications.[22][41]

It has been shown that HIV-infected women with bacterial vaginosis (BV) have higher HIV concentrations in their vaginal secretions.[42] Diagnostic criteria for BV have also been associated with a female genital tract factor that induces expression of HIV.[22] The elevated HIV copy number in vaginal secretions of women with BV has been associated with an increased risk of heterosexual transmission of HIV.[43]

There is evidence of an association between BV and increased rates of sexually transmitted infections such as HIV/AIDS.[22] BV is associated with up to a six-fold increase of HIV shedding. There is also a correlation between the absence of vaginal lactobacilli and infection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis. BV is a risk factor for viral shedding and herpes virus type 2 infection. BV may increase the risk infection or reactivation of HPV.[22][33]

In addition, bacterial vaginosis an intercurrent disease in pregnancy may increase the risk of pregnancy complications, most notably premature birth or miscarriage.[44] Pregnant women with BV have a higher risk of chorioamnionitis, miscarriage, preterm birth, premature rupture of membranes, and postpartum endometritis. BV is associated with gynaecological and obstetric complications. Data suggest an association between BV, tubal factor infertility, and pelvic inflammatory disease. Women with BV who are treated with vitro fertilization have a lower implantation rate and higher rates of early pregnancy loss.[22][33]

Epidemiology

BV is the most common infection of the vagina in women of reproductive age.[8] The percentage of women affected at any given time vary between 5% and 70%.[5] BV is most common in parts of Africa and least common in Asia and Europe.[5] In the United States about 30% of those between the ages of 14 and 49 are affected.[13] Rates vary considerably between ethnic groups within a country.[5]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  6. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  7. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  8. 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  9. 9.0 9.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "Nardis2013" defined multiple times with different content
  10. 10.0 10.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  11. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  12. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  13. 13.0 13.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  14. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  15. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  16. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  17. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  18. 18.0 18.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  19. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  20. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  21. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  22. 22.0 22.1 22.2 22.3 22.4 22.5 22.6 22.7 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  23. 23.0 23.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  24. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  25. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  26. 26.0 26.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  27. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  28. 28.0 28.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  29. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  30. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  31. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  32. 32.0 32.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  33. 33.0 33.1 33.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  34. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  35. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  36. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  37. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  38. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  39. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  40. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  41. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  42. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  43. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  44. Bacterial vaginosis from National Health Service, UK. Page last reviewed: 03/10/2013

External links