John II, Bishop of Jerusalem

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
(Redirected from Bishop John II of Jerusalem)
Jump to: navigation, search

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

For the 13th century King of Jerusalem, see John II of Jerusalem.

John II (c. 356 – 10 January 417) was bishop of Jerusalem from AD 387 to AD 417. John II succeeded to the episcopal throne of Jerusalem on the death of Saint Cyril in 386 (or 387). He was the author, according to an increasing number of modern scholars,[1] of the five Mystagogical Catecheses traditionally ascribed to his predecessor Cyril.

He is revered as a saint by the Orthodox Church and his feast day is held on March 30.[2][3][4] He is also honored as a saint by the Roman Catholic Church, which commemorates him on January 10 (Martyrologium Romanum, 2004, p. 92).

Life

John's authority was harshly questioned twice by Jerome, then abbot in Bethlehem.

The first time was in the frame of the first polemic with Origen's followers, and is narrated mainly in Jerome's treatise dedicated to Pammachius "Contra Ioannes Hierosolymitanum (Against John of Jerusalem)", as well as in other letters of Jerome (n. 51, 82 and 86). Jerome accused John of supporting the ideas of the Origenists.

The Origenist doctrines attributed to John were: (i.) that the Son does not see the Father; (ii.) that souls are confined in earthly bodies, as in a prison; (iii.) that the devil may be saved; (iv.) that the skins with which God clothed Adam and Eve were human bodies; (v.) that the body in the resurrection will be without sex; (vi.) that the descriptions of Paradise are allegorical: trees meaning angels, and rivers the heavenly virtues; (vii) that the waters above and below the firmament are angels and devils; (viii.) that the image of God was altogether lost at the Fall.[5] John ignored the accusations of Origenism and gave assurances about his faith in the Trinity: however, it is probable that John did have certain Origenist leanings.[6]

The immediate occasion of this crisis was the visit of Epiphanius, bishop of Salamis in Cyprus, at Jerusalem, in 394. Epiphanius preached, in the Church of the Resurrection, a pointed sermon against Origenism, which was thought to be directly aimed at John. After many unseemly scenes, Epiphanius advised Jerome and his friends to separate from their bishop John. To be fully independent from him, Epiphanius ordained Paulinian (Jerome’s brother) to priesthood. Epiphanius attempted to defend his irregular action, but John appealed to Alexandria against Jerome and his supporters as schismatics. The bishop, Theophilus, at once took the side of John. The dispute was thus prolonged for about four years, and, after some attempts at reconciliation, and the exhibition of much bitterness, amounting to the practical excommunication of Jerome and his friends, the dispute was stopped, perhaps by Theophilus.[5] The dispute broke out afresh when Jerome deeply criticized the reception reserved by John for some of the 400 Origenistic monks of Nitria, dispelled by the Egyptian deserts by the bishop of Alexandria Theophilus (fifty of these monks went to Constantinople, and found there a cordial welcome with the bishop John Chrysostom in 401).

The second harsh attack against John was triggered off in 414 by Jerome and concerned Pelagius. Jerome, supported by a Latin disciple of Augustine of the name of Paulus Orosius, took a stand against the deacon Pelagius, who was then received in Jerusalem and not explicitly condemned by the local synod of Diospolis (415). We have a letter of Pope Innocent I who censures John for having allowed the Pelagians to cause a disturbance at Bethlehem and exhorts him to be more watchful over his diocese in future: this letter [2] is dated 417, the year of the death of both John and Innocent, and it is probable that John never received it. Although sources are more diverse here, the accusation of arianism seems a little simplistic and it is probable that we do not have all the information needed to understand the situation.

In 415, two years before his death in 417, he was probably directly involved in the discovery (invention) of the Relics of Saint Stephen.[7]:99

Writings

According to the 5th century ecclesiastic writer Gennadius of Massilia, John "wrote a book against those who disparaged his studies, in which he shows that he follows the genius of Origen not his creed".[8]

Due to his Damnatio memoriae, the writings of John II were not kept in general under his name, but, besides Mystagogical Catecheses, it is very much probable that certain homilies, in Greek, Georgian or Armenian, must be restored to him, as happened in the second half of 20th century for his homilies upon "the Feast of the Angels",[9] and on the "Dedication of the Church of Holy Zion"[10]

The edition of a liturgical lectionary of Jerusalem, preserved in an old Armenian version, is also attributed to him.

Dedication of the Church of Holy Zion

According to M. van Esbrœck,[7]:134 John of Jerusalem showed great cleverness in understanding and including the Jewish Christian minority in Jerusalem. One of the acts that ratified the reconciliation of the Greek and the Judeo-Christian communities was the Consecration of the Church of Holy Zion[11] on 394 CE: the homily pronounced by John was preserved in Armenian and not published until 1973.[10]

The new building on Mount Zion left untouched the Judeo-Christian synagogue[11]:{{{3}}}. The day of the consecration was, according to van Esbrœck, 15 September 394, and van Esbrœck suggests that it very probably corresponded in such a year to the 10th of Tishrei,[11]:{{{3}}}[7]:{{{3}}} the traditional day of the Hebraic feast of Yom Kippur. The scholar Daniel Stokl Ben Ezra suggests that the eve of Yom Kippur coincided with 20 September, i.e. with the last day of the week of Christian celebration called the "Encaenia" (dedication of the church of the Holy Sepulchre, which celebration was connected to the discovering of the True Cross).[12] Actually the central idea of John's homily is linked to the celebration of Kippur[12]:{{{3}}}[7]:{{{3}}}, through the blessing of the church altar, symbolized by the "Kaporet" (Mercy seat).[11]:{{{3}}}

In the first part of this mystical and allegorical homily, the purification of the lips (Isaiah 6:7), associated with the purification of Kippur, is said to legitimatize the description of the descent of the Holy Spirit in the church-building, symbol of the whole Church. In the second part, John proposes a typology of the mystical experience describing seven heavenly circles accessible by the mediation of the Kaporet. At the eighth circle, there is the coming of the Holy Spirit as groom of the soul, as the Holy Spirit enters in the upper room (Acts 1:13).[7]:114 This homily includes more than three hundred allusions to Biblical verses (including also the apocryphal 4 Ezra) and is influenced by texts like the Ascension of Isaiah. John also addresses four times the monk Porphyry, future bishop of Gaza, who was probably present at the ceremony.

Notes

  1. ↑ Paul F. Bradshaw, The Search for the Origins of Christian Worship 2002 ISBN 0-19-521732-2, pag 113
  2. ↑ March 30/April 12. Orthodox Calendar (PRAVOSLAVIE.RU).
  3. ↑ (Greek) Συναξαριστής. 30 Μαρτίου. ECCLESIA.GR. (H ΕΚΚΛΗΣΙΑ ΤΗΣ ΕΛΛΑΔΟΣ).
  4. ↑ Great Synaxaristes: (Greek) Ὁ Ἅγιος Ἰωάννης Πατριάρχης Ἱεροσολύμων. 30 ΜΑΡΤΙΟΥ. ΜΕΓΑΣ ΣΥΝΑΞΑΡΙΣΤΗΣ.
  5. ↑ 5.0 5.1 Philip Schaff, Jerome: The Principal Works of St. Jerome New York: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1892 Text from CCEL
  6. ↑ W. A. Jurgens The Faith of the Early Fathers 1979 ISBN 0-8146-1007-2,pag 201
  7. ↑ 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 M. van Esbrœck, Jean II de Jérusalem, in Analecta Bollandiana, Tome 102 (1984)
  8. ↑ Gennadius of Massilia, De scriptoribus ecclesiasticis 31 text from CCEL
  9. ↑ M. van Esbroeck, Dans une Homily géorgienne sur les Archanges, in Analecta Bollandiana 89 (1971) 155-176
  10. ↑ 10.0 10.1 M. van Esbrœck, Une homélie sur l’Église attribuée à Jean de Jérusalem, in Le Muséon, 86 (1973), p. 283-304
  11. ↑ 11.0 11.1 11.2 11.3 Bargil Pixner, The Church of the Apostles found on Mount Zion, Biblical Archaeology Review 16.3 May/June 1990 [1]
  12. ↑ 12.0 12.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

References

  • M. van Esbrœck, Jean II de Jérusalem, in Analecta Bollandiana, Tome 102, Fasc.1-2 (1984), p. 99-134 (includes also the text of John's homily on the Dedication of the Church of Holy Zion, in French)
  • A. Piédagnel - P. Paris, Cyrille de Jérusalem, Catéchèses mystagogiques, SC 126 (1966) et 126bis (1980)
  • P. Nautin, La lettre de Théophile d’Alexandrie à l’Église de Jérusalem et la réponse de Jean de Jérusalem (juin-juillet 396), Revue d'histoire ecclésiastique, 96 (1974), p. 365-394
  • F.J. Leroy, Pseudo-chrysostomica: Jean de Jérusalem. Vers une résurrection littéraire ?, dans Studia patristica, 10 (TU 107), Berlin, 1970, p. 131-136
Preceded by Bishop of Jerusalem
387–417		 Succeeded by
Praulius
Retrieved from "https://infogalactic.com/w/index.php?title=John_II,_Bishop_of_Jerusalem&oldid=718045852"