CBOCS West, Inc. v. Humphries
| CBOCS West v. Humphries | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||
| Argued February 20, 2008 Decided June 30, 2008 |
|||||
| Full case name | CBOCS West, Inc., v. Hedrick G. Humphries | ||||
| Docket nos. | 06-1431 | ||||
| Citations | 553 U.S. 442 (more)
553 U.S. 442, 128 S.Ct. 1951, 170 L.Ed.2d 864
|
||||
| Holding | |||||
| Petitioner can claim retaliation in 42 U.S.C. §1981 | |||||
| Court membership | |||||
|
|||||
| Case opinions | |||||
| Majority | Breyer, joined by Roberts, Stevens, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, Alito | ||||
| Dissent | Thomas, joined by Scalia | ||||
CBOCS West, Inc., v. Hedrick G. Humphries, 553 U.S. 442 (2008), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that the petitioner, Hedrick Humphries, was unfairly retaliated against by CBOCS West Inc. for complaining to managers about the dismissal of another black employee for race reasons. The court found that CBOCS West Inc. had violated the Civil Rights Act of 1871 and the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Background
Hendrick Humpries was a mid-level manager for a Cracker Barrel restaurant, which is owned by CBOCS West Inc. Humphries was fired from his job at Cracker Barrel for speaking out over another Black coworker being fired for his race. He originally filed under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and 42 U.S.C. §1981. However Title VII claims first must be made to the U.S. Equal Opportunity Employment Commission and that part of the case was dismissed by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. Humphries appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, which reversed the earlier decision and ordered a trial. The trial held that CBOCS did indeed violate Title VII and U.S.C. § 1981. CBOCS then a petition for a writ of certiorari with the Supreme Court.
Opinion of the Court
The Court held that CBOCS did indeed violate Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and U.S.C. §1981 which provides that "[a]ll citizens ... shall have the same right ... as is enjoyed by white citizens ... to inherit, purchase, lease, sell, hold, and convey real and personal property".[1] The court relied heavily on stare decisis in its decision, citing Sullivan v. Little Hunting Park, Inc. and Jackson v. Birmingham Board of Education.
