Charles Porter (Lord Chancellor of Ireland)

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search

Sir Charles Porter (6 September 1631 – 8 December 1696), was a flamboyant and somewhat controversial English-born judge who had a highly successful career, being twice Lord Chancellor of Ireland.

Early life

Porter was born in Norwich, a younger son of Edmund Porter, prebendary of Norwich and chaplain to Thomas Coventry, 1st Baron Coventry. Much of what we know of his early life comes from his own very colourful later account. During the Second English Civil War, while he was an apprentice, he took part on the Royalist side in the serious rioting in Norwich in 1648. He was pursued by a troop of Parliamentary soldiers, and escaped by seizing a child and pretending to carry it to safety. He fled to Yarmouth and took ship for Amsterdam; there he first trained as a soldier, then ran a tavern.[1] After about five years he judged it safe to return home.

He decided on a career in the law, entered Middle Temple in 1656 and was called to the Bar in 1663. Critics were to say that he was a poor lawyer, and his addiction to all forms of pleasure, especially drink, undoubtedly injured his practice.On the other hand he was a hard worker, had a good knowledge of procedure and was a superb orator. Early in his career he acquired the reputation of a man who had "the courage of his convictions". As counsel in Crispe v Dalmahoy [2] (1675), one of several controversial cases on the claims of both Houses of Parliament to act as judges, Porter insisted on his right to argue against the alleged judicial powers of the House of Commons, even on pain of imprisonment for contempt.[3] He attracted the favourable notice of several judges, especially Francis North, 1st Baron Guildford, who described him as "a man who had the good fortune to be universally loved".[4] During the last years of Charles II, with Guildford at the head of the judiciary, Porter was at the height of his professional success, and entered Parliament as member for Tregony in 1685.

Lord Chancellor of Ireland

Ever since the Restoration there had been great difficulty in finding a suitable Irish Lord Chancellor: MIchael Boyle, Archbishop of Armagh, held the office for twenty years simply because no professional judge of repute was prepared to do so. Boyle was conscientious and incorruptible, but in old age his mental and physical powers declined. Despite the objections of the Lord Lieutenant, Henry Hyde, 2nd Earl of Clarendon, who was a good friend of Boyle,[5] it was decided to replace him with Porter, who was knighted and appointed Lord Chancellor in April 1686.

Porter soon found himself in difficulty: as his later career would show he was by no means hostile to Roman Catholics, and was indeed in favour of a considerable degree of religious toleration for members of that faith. When the King first confided to Porter his plan to admit Catholics to public office, he did not object to a limited policy of allowing the admission of a number of Catholics into the Government. [6] Talbot appears to have been the only member of the Dublin administration in whom the King confided, which suggests that James initially trusted him. [7] However Porter strongly objected to the policy of wholesale replacement of Protestant office-holders by Catholics, and this rapidly undermined his credit with James II. Porter quarreled violently with the Duke of Tyrconnel, effective leader of the Irish Catholics, and soon to be Lord Deputy of Ireland. Tyrconnel, true to his nickname of "Lying Dick Talbot", falsely accused him taking bribes,[8] and he was dismissed from ofice early in 1687.[9] He returned to his practice at the Bar in England and was said to have been reduced to a condition of near poverty, but his fortunes were restored by the Revolution of 1688, of which he was an early and strong supporter. He was appointed King's Counsel; entered the House of Commons as member for Windsor in 1690, and late that year was reappointed Lord Chancellor of Ireland.

Second term

His second term as Chancellor, like his first, was plagued with political controversy; ironically, having been removed from office for showing a lack of favour to Roman Catholics, he was now accused of excessive sympathy to their cause. In his capacity as Lord Justice of Ireland he signed the Treaty of Limerick, which gave generous terms of surrender to the defeated Catholics, promising them religious tolerance, security of property and a general pardon. Porter was determined to observe the terms of the Treaty, so far as possible. This brought him into conflict with most other members of the Dublin administration, although he had a strong ally in Sir Richard Cox, a future Lord Chancellor. The conflict intensified after the appointment of Lord Capel as Lord Deputy. Porter's opponents were determined to have him removed, the great difficulty being that King William III thought well of him. In 1693 he was charged with maladministration before the English House of Commons. Being still a member of the House, he attended the hearing in person and secured a favourable verdict.[10]

Impeachment

His enemies returned to the attack in 1695 when he was impeached by the Irish House of Commons for high crimes and misdemeanours; the articles, while including a reference to Jacobite sympathies, chiefly concerned his conduct as a judge and listed a series of alleged acts of corruption and abuse of office. Porter was permitted to speak in his own defence; his speech was generally agreed to have been a masterpiece, and the House of Commons rejected the charges by a large majority.[11]

Last years

On the night of his acquittal, Porter became involved in a foolish altercation with Robert Rochfort, the Speaker of the House of Commons, a political opponent, who was evidently furious at the failure of the impeachment. Seeing the Chancellor's coach trying to pull ahead of his own, Rochfort, who had a great sense of his own dignity, jumped down and tried to physically prevent Porter's coachman from going ahead of him. Porter sensibly stayed out of the quarrel, but the following day at his request the Lords sent a protest to the Commons, who replied that no insult had been intended.[12]

Porter tried so far as possible to counter what he regarded as Capel's aggressively Protestant policy. On the other hand, as regards appointments to high office, there may well have been faults on both sides, since it seems that Porter, no less than Capel, was anxious to secure as many important offices as possible for his friends and relatives. [13] Porter in 1695 told Capel that he "could not bear it" if William Neave, his political enemy, were appointed Second Serjeant: Capel sharply retorted that he had allowed Porter to nominate his own protege, Sir Thomas Pakenham, as First Serjeant, as well as allowing Porter's own brother William to take silk. Neave was duly appointed over Porter's protests. [14]

On Capel's death in the spring of 1696, Porter, again Lord Justice, was briefly at the head of the Irish administration: but on 8 December 1696, on returning to his chambers after leaving Court, he collapsed and died suddenly of a stroke.[15]

Family

Porter married twice, but few details of his marriages survive. He had three children:

  • Frederick, who married his cousin Mary Porter, but had no children.
  • Elizabeth, who married firstly Edward Devenish, and then Rev John Moore, fourth son of Henry, 3rd Earl of Drogheda and had issue by both marriages.
  • Letitia, who married George Macartney: the celebrated statesman George Macartney, 1st Earl Macartney, was their grandson.

His brother William followed him to Ireland, was called to the Irish Bar and became King's Counsel in 1695.[16] They had one sister Elsie, who married John Miller: they were the ancestors of the Miller Baronets of County Clare.[17]

Parliament some four years after his death passed a motion to protect the property rights of Porter's children, which seems to confirm reports that he died in a condition of some poverty.[18]

Character

Porter's strong opinions and refusal to compromise on his principles made him enemies in the political sphere; yet in private life, according to Lord Guildford, he was universally loved as a man who was witty, generous and magnanimous. His fondness for drink damaged his career, but on the whole he was a success as Lord Chancellor; William III, who normally regarded his Ministers with a complete lack of human emotion, went so far as to say on Porter's death that he "was sorry for the loss of a good Chancellor". Despite his chronic need of money he prided himself on not taking bribes: the second Earl of Clarendon, who had a very low opinion of the legal profession in general, said that Porter and Roger North were "the only two honest lawyers I ever knew".[19]

Political offices
Preceded by
Archbishop Michael Boyle
Lord Chancellor of Ireland
1686–1687
Succeeded by
Sir Alexander Fitton
Preceded by
In commission

Title last held by Sir Alexander Fitton

Lord Chancellor of Ireland
1690–1696
Succeeded by
In commission

Title next held by John Methuen

References

  1. Ball, F. Elrington The Judges in Ireland 1221–1921 John Murray London 1926
  2. State Trials Vol. VII p.458
  3. O'Flanagan J. Roderick Lives of the Lord Chancellors of Ireland London 1870
  4. See the sketch of Porter's character in Lord Braybrooke's edition of the Diary of Samuel Pepys
  5. O'Flanagan Lives of the Chancellors
  6. Kenyon, J.P. Robert Spencer, 1st Earl of Sunderland 1641-1702 Longmans Greene 1958 Reissued 1992 p.130
  7. Kenyon p.130
  8. Kenyon p.136
  9. O'Flanagan
  10. Ball Judges in Ireland
  11. O'Flanagan
  12. Judges in Ireland
  13. Hart, A.R. History of the King's Serjeants-at-law in Ireland Four Courts Press Dublin 2000
  14. Hart Irish Serjeants-at-law
  15. Judges in Ireland
  16. Hart Irish Serjeants-at-law
  17. Burke's Peerage 5th Edition LOndon 1838
  18. Journal of the House of Commons Volume 9
  19. Lives of the Chancellors