A crash test is a form of destructive testing usually performed in order to ensure safe design standards in crashworthiness and crash compatibility for various modes of transportation or related systems and components.
- Frontal-impact tests: which is what most people initially think of when asked about a crash test. These are usually impacts upon a solid concrete wall at a specified speed, but can also be vehicle-vehicle tests. SUVs have been singled out in these tests for a while, due to the high ride-height that they often have.
- Moderate Overlap tests: in which only part of the front of the car impacts with a barrier (vehicle). These are important, as impact forces (approximately) remain the same as with a frontal impact test, but a smaller fraction of the car is required to absorb all of the force. These tests are often realized by cars turning into oncoming traffic. This type of testing is done by the U.S.A. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), EuroNCAP, Australasian New Car Assessment Program (ANCAP) and ASEAN NCAP.
- Small Overlap tests: this is where only a small portion of the car's structure strikes an object such as a pole or a tree, or if a car were to clip another. This is the most demanding test as it loads the most force onto the cars structure at any given speed. These are usually conducted at 15-20% of the front vehicle structure.
- Side-impact tests: these forms of accidents have a very significant likelihood of fatality, as cars do not have a significant crumple zone to absorb the impact forces before an occupant is injured.
- Roll-over tests: which tests a car's ability (specifically the pillars holding the roof) to support itself in a dynamic impact. More recently dynamic rollover tests have been proposed as opposed to static crush testing (video).
- Roadside hardware crash tests: are used to ensure crash barriers and crash cushions will protect vehicle occupants from roadside hazards, and also to ensure that guard rails, sign posts, light poles and similar appurtenances do not pose an undue hazard to vehicle occupants.
- Old versus new: Often an old and big car against a small and new car, or two different generations of the same car model. These tests are performed to show the advancements in crashworthiness.
- Computer model: Because of the cost of full-scale crash tests, engineers often run many simulated crash tests using computer models to refine their vehicle or barrier designs before conducting live tests.
Frontal moderate overlap crash test of a 2008 Chevrolet Aveo.
Side impact crash test of a 1999 Cadillac DeVille.
Rollover crash test of a 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt SS.
20.6% Small overlap crash test of a 2010 Toyota Yaris.
Side narrow-object impact of a 2015 Ford Expedition.
Frontal full-width crash test of a 2015 BMW X3.
Side impact crash test of a 2014 Scion FR-S.
Rear offset crash test of a 1997 Mazda 626.
- Australasian New Car Assessment Program (ANCAP)
- Auto Review Car Assessment Program (ARCAP)
- China New Car Assessment Program (C-NCAP)
- European New Car Assessment Programme (Euro NCAP)
- Allgemeiner Deutscher Automobil-Club (ADAC) in Germany
- Japan New Car Assessment Program (JNCAP)
- Latin New Car Assessment Program (Latin NCAP) in Germany
- National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) in the United States, specifically the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) and New Car Assessment Program (NCAP)
- Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) in the United States
Crash tests are conducted under rigorous scientific and safety standards. Each crash test is very expensive so the maximum amount of data must be extracted from each test. Usually, this requires the use of high-speed data-acquisition, at least one triaxial accelerometer and a crash test dummy, but often includes more.
- In 1998 the Rover 100 received a one-star Adult Occupant Rating in EuroNCAP crash tests; sales promptly collapsed and the 18-year-old design was quickly scrapped.
- In 2005 the Daewoo Kalos made news in Europe and Australia by scoring only two stars in its crash test, resulting in lower sales and highlighting the influence of vehicle crashworthiness on a model's success in the marketplace. The result for Holden in Australia, who retailed the Kalos under the Holden Barina name, resulted in a considerable amount of negative publicity, with the managing director of Holden forced to publicly defend the vehicle
- The second generation Isuzu Trooper (1995–1997) models were rated "Not Acceptable" by Consumer Reports for their tendency to roll over during testing. After the report Trooper sales never recovered and two years later production ceased.
Crash testing programs
There are a number of crash test programs around the world dedicated to providing consumers with a source of comparitative information in relation to the safety performance of new and used vehicles. Examples of new car crash test programs include National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's NCAP, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, Australasian New Car Assessment Program, EuroNCAP and JapNCAP. Programs such as the Used Car Safety Ratings provide consumers information on the safety performance of vehicles based on real world crash data.
- Air safety
- Automobile safety
- Automobile safety rating
- Car accident
- Crash test dummy
- European New Car Assessment Programme (Euro NCAP)
- Head injury criterion
- Insurance Institute for Highway Safety
- Moose test
- Out of position (crash testing)
- NASA Impact Dynamics Research Facility
- "Newly Developed Roof Crush Test Proves Existence of Safer Vehicles that can Withstand Rollover Crashes". The Center for Auto Safety.
- "Ford Fiesta Vs Ford Sierra". ADAC. Archived from the original on April 19, 2008.
- Renault Modus Vs Volvo 940. Archived February 16, 2014 at the Wayback Machine
- Fallah, Alborz (14 June 2006). "Holden Barina 2006 Poor Safety Slows Sales". CarAdvice.
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to Crash tests.|