Civil War Defenses of Washington

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
(Redirected from Defenses of Washington)
Jump to: navigation, search
Civil War Defenses of Washington
File:FortStevensWashington1864.jpg
Location Washington, D.C.
NRHP Reference # 74000274
Added to NRHP July 15, 1974[1]
1865 Map of American Civil War defenses of Washington, D.C.

Civil War Defenses of Washington (also known as Fort Circle Parks) is a collection of National Park Service properties in and around Washington, D.C. joined by a similar historic theme. Other forts have become state and city parks, in the area. Together they commemorate the defense of the capital during the American Civil War.

History

The Washington area had 68 major enclosed forts, as well as 93 prepared (but unarmed) batteries for field guns, and seven blockhouses surrounding it during the American Civil War.[2] There were also twenty miles of rifle pits and thirty miles of connecting military roads.[3] These were Union forts, and the Confederacy never captured one. Indeed, most never came under enemy fire. These were used to house soldiers and store artillery and other supplies.

List of Historic Forts

The following forts are listed in the National Register of Historic Places nomination form.

  • Battery Kemble Park Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Fort Bayard Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Fort Reno Park Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Fort De Russy Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Fort Stevens Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Fort Slocum Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Fort Totten Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Fort Bunker Hill Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Fort Lincoln Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Fort Mahan Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Fort Chaplin Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Fort Dupont Park Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Fort Davis Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Fort Ricketts Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Fort Stanton Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Fort Carroll Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Fort Greble Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Fort Foote (MD) Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Fort Marcy Park (VA) Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

Other Forts

Development of "Fort Circle"

Fort Stevens today

In 1919 the Commissioners of the District of Columbia pushed Congress to pass a bill to consolidate the aging forts into a "Fort Circle" system of parks that would ring the growing city of Washington. As envisioned by the Commissioners, the Fort Circle would be a green ring of parks outside the city, owned by the government, and connected by a "Fort Drive" road in order to allow Washington's citizens to easily escape the confines of the capital. However, the bill allowing for the purchase of the former forts, which had been turned back over to private ownership after the war, failed to pass both the House of Representatives and Senate.[4]

Despite that failure, in 1925 a similar bill passed both the House and Senate, which allowed for the creation of the National Capital Parks Commission (NCPC) to oversee the construction of a Fort Circle of parks similar to that proposed in 1919.[5] The NCPC was authorized to begin purchasing land occupied by the old forts, much of which had been turned over to private ownership following the war. Records indicate that the site of Fort Stanton was purchased for a total of $56,000 in 1926.[6] The duty of purchasing land and constructing the fort parks changed hands several times throughout the 1920s and 1930s, eventually culminating with the Department of the Interior and the National Park Service taking control of the project in the 1940s.[7]

During the Great Depression, crews from the Civilian Conservation Corps embarked on projects to improve and maintain the parks, which were still under the control of District authority at that time. At Fort Stanton, CCC members trimmed trees and cleared brush, as well as maintaining and constructing park buildings.[8] Various non-park buildings were also discussed for the land. The City Department of Education proposed building a school on park land, while authorities from the local water utility suggested the construction of a water tower would be suitable for the tall hills of the park.[9] The Second World War interrupted these plans, and post-war budget cuts instituted by President Harry S. Truman postponed the construction of the Fort Drive once more. Though land for the parks had mostly been purchased, construction of the ring road connecting them was pushed back again and again. Other projects managed to find funding, however. In 1949, President Truman approved a supplemental appropriation request of $175,000 to construct "a swimming pool and associated facilities" at Fort Stanton Park.[10]

By 1963, when President John F. Kennedy began pushing Congress to finally build the Fort Circle Drive,[11] many in Washington and the National Park Service were openly questioning whether the plan had outgrown its usefulness.[12] After all, by this time, Washington had grown past the ring of forts that had protected it a century earlier, and city surface roads already connected the parks, albeit not in as linear a route as envisioned.[13] The plan to link the fort parks via a grand drive was quietly dropped in the years that followed.

Administration

Forts Foote, Greble, Stanton, Ricketts, Davis, Dupont, Chaplin, Mahan, and Battery Carroll are administered by National Capital Parks-East. Forts Bunker Hill, Totten, Slocum, Stevens, DeRussy, Reno, Bayard, Battery Kemble, and Battleground National Cemetery are administered by Rock Creek Park. Fort Marcy is administered by George Washington Memorial Parkway.[14]

References

  1. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  2. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  3. Cooling, Benjamin Franklin III and Walton H. Owen II (2010). Mr. Lincoln's Forts: A Guide to the Civil War Defenses of Washington. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press. ISBN 978-0810860674
  4. Journal of the House of Representatives of the United States ... 66th Congress, 1st Session (Washington, DC: The Government Printing Office, 1919), p. 594
  5. "Linking of Forts Embodied in Plan," The Evening Star, December 4, 1925
  6. Record Group 328, Records of the National Park Service, National Archives, General Records, Planting Files, 1924-67, 545-100, Fort Drive, #2, T.C. Jeffers, Landscape Architect, "THE FORT DRIVE, A Chronological History of the More Important Actions and Events Relating Thereto," Feb. 7, 1947.
  7. National Capital Park and Planning Commission." In H.S. Wagner and Charles G. Sauers, Study of the Organization of the National Capital Parks (Washington, DC: The National Park Service, National Capital Parks, 1939), p. 40
  8. Record Group 79, Records of the National Park Service, National Archives, Records of the Branch of Recreation, Land Protection, and State Cooperation, Narrative Reports Concerning ECW (CCC) Projects in NPS Areas, 1933-35, District of Columbia, Boxes 11, National Capital Parks, Narrative Report covering Fifth Enrollment Period, ECW Camp N.A. #1, Washington, DC, Apr-Oct 1935
  9. Record Group 66, Records of the National Park Service, National Archives, Entry 17, Project Files, 1910-52, Forts, Fort Stanton
  10. House Executive Document No. 361, 81st Congress, 1st Session, "Supplemental Estimate of Appropriation for the Department of the Interior," October 11, 1949.
  11. Martha Strayer, "JFK Settles Battle Over Ft. Drive," Washington Daily News, May 28, 1963.
  12. National Capital Planning Commission, Fort Park System: A Re-evaluation Study of Fort Drive, Washington, D.C. April 1965 By Fred W. Tuemmler and Associates, College Park, Maryland (Washington, DC: National Capital Planning Commission, 1965), pp. 3–9
  13. "Fort Sites Eyed for Future Use," The Washington Post, Friday, October 2, 1964.
  14. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

External links