Dimensionless physical constant
It has been suggested that this article be merged with physical constant. (Discuss) Proposed since May 2016.

In physics, a dimensionless physical constant, sometimes called a fundamental physical constant, is a physical constant that is dimensionless. It has no units attached and has a numerical value that is independent of the system of units used. Perhaps the bestknown example is the finestructure constant, α, which has approximate value of ^{1}⁄_{137.036}.
The term fundamental physical constant is also used to refer to universal but dimensioned physical constants such as the speed of light c, vacuum permittivity ε_{0}, Planck constant h, and the gravitational constant G.^{[1]} Increasingly,^{[year needed]} physicists reserve the use of the term fundamental physical constant for dimensionless physical constants that cannot be derived from any other source.^{[citation needed]}
Contents
Characteristics
There is no exhaustive list of such constants. But it is meaningful to ask about the minimal number of fundamental constants necessary to determine a given physical theory. Thus, the Standard Model requires 25 physical constants, most of them the masses of fundamental particles (which become "dimensionless" when expressed in Planck units, i.e. as multiples of the Planck mass).
Fundamental physical constants cannot be derived but have to be measured. Development in physics may lead to either a reduction or an extension of their number: discovery of new particles, or new relationships between physical phenomena, would introduce new constants, while on the other hand, the development of a more fundamental theory might allow the derivation of several constants from a more fundamental constant.
A longsought goal of theoretical physics is to find first principles ("Theory of Everything") from which all of the fundamental dimensionless constants can be calculated and compared to the measured values.
The large number of fundamental constants required in the Standard Model has been regarded as unsatisfactory since the theory's formulation in the 1970s. The desire for a theory that would allow the calculation of particle masses is a core motivation for the search for "Physics beyond the Standard Model".
The mathematician Simon Plouffe has made an extensive search of computer databases of mathematical formulae, seeking formulae for the mass ratios of the fundamental particles.
Arthur Eddington set out alleged mathematical reasons why the reciprocal of the fine structure constant had to be exactly 136.^{[year needed]} When its value was discovered to be closer to 137, he changed his argument to match that value.^{[citation needed]} Experiments have since shown that Eddington was wrong; to six significant digits, the reciprocal of the finestructure constant is 137.036.
An empirical relation between the masses of the electron, muon and tau has been discovered by physicist Yoshio Koide, but this formula remains unexplained.
Examples
Dimensionless fundamental physical constants include:
 α, the fine structure constant, the coupling constant for the electromagnetic interaction (≈1/137.036). Also the square of the electron charge, expressed in Planck units, which defines the scale of charge of elementary particles with charge.
 μ or β, the protontoelectron mass ratio, the rest mass of the proton divided by that of the electron (≈1836.15). More generally, the ratio of the rest masses of any pair of elementary particles.
 α_{s}, the coupling constant for the strong force (≈1)
 α_{G}, the gravitational coupling constant (≈10^{−45}) which is the square of the electron mass, expressed in Planck units. This defines the scale of the masses of elementary particles and has also been used to express the relative strength of gravitation.
Fine structure constant
One of the dimensionless fundamental constants is the fine structure constant:
where e is the elementary charge, ħ is the reduced Planck's constant, c is the speed of light in a vacuum, and ε_{0} is the permittivity of free space. The fine structure constant is fixed to the strength of the electromagnetic force. At low energies, α ≈ 1/137, whereas at the scale of the Z boson, about 90 GeV, one measures α ≈ 1/127. There is no accepted theory explaining the value of α; Richard Feynman elaborates:
There is a most profound and beautiful question associated with the observed coupling constant, e – the amplitude for a real electron to emit or absorb a real photon. It is a simple number that has been experimentally determined to be close to 0.08542455. (My physicist friends won't recognize this number, because they like to remember it as the inverse of its square: about 137.03597 with about an uncertainty of about 2 in the last decimal place. It has been a mystery ever since it was discovered more than fifty years ago, and all good theoretical physicists put this number up on their wall and worry about it.) Immediately you would like to know where this number for a coupling comes from: is it related to pi or perhaps to the base of natural logarithms? Nobody knows. It's one of the greatest damn mysteries of physics: a magic number that comes to us with no understanding by man. You might say the "hand of God" wrote that number, and "we don't know how He pushed his pencil." We know what kind of a dance to do experimentally to measure this number very accurately, but we don't know what kind of dance to do on the computer to make this number come out, without putting it in secretly!
— Richard Feynman, Richard P. Feynman (1985). QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter. Princeton University Press. p. 129. ISBN 0691083886.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
The analog of the fine structure constant for gravitation is the gravitational coupling constant. This constant requires the arbitrary choice of a pair of objects having mass. The electron and proton are natural choices because they are stable, and their properties are well measured and well understood. If α_{G} is calculated from the masses of two protons, its value is ≈10^{−38}.
Standard model
The original standard model of particle physics from the 1970s contained 19 fundamental dimensionless constants describing the masses of the particles and the strengths of the electroweak and strong forces. In the 1990s, neutrinos were discovered to have nonzero mass, and a quantity called the vacuum angle was found to be indistinguishable from zero.
The complete standard model requires 25 fundamental dimensionless constants (Baez, 2011). At present, their numerical values are not understood in terms of any widely accepted theory and are determined only from measurement. These 25 constants are:
 the fine structure constant;
 the strong coupling constant;
 fifteen masses of the fundamental particles (relative to the Planck mass M_{p}=1.22089(6)×10^{19} GeV/c^{2}), namely:
 six quarks
 six leptons
 the Higgs boson
 the W boson
 the Z boson
 four parameters of the CKM matrix, describing how quarks oscillate between different forms;
 four parameters of the Pontecorvo–Maki–Nakagawa–Sakata matrix, which does the same thing for neutrinos.
Dimensionless constants of the Standard Model  

Symbol  Description  Dimensionless value  Alternative value representation  
m_{u} / m_{P}  Up quark mass  1.4×10^{−22} – 2.7×10^{−22}  1.7 – 3.3 MeV/c^{2}  
m_{d} / m_{P}  Down quark mass  3.4×10^{−22} – 4.8×10^{−22}  4.1 – 5.8 MeV/c^{2}  
m_{c} / m_{P}  Charm quark mass  1.04×10^{−19}  1.27 GeV/c^{2}  
m_{s} / m_{P}  Strange quark mass  8.27×10^{−21}  101 MeV/c^{2}  
m_{t} / m_{P}  Top quark mass  1.41×10^{−17}  172.0 GeV/c^{2}  
m_{b} / m_{P}  Bottom quark mass  3.43×10^{−19}  4.19 GeV/c^{2}  
θ_{12,CKM}  CKM 12mixing angle  0.23  13.1°  
θ_{23,CKM}  CKM 23mixing angle  0.042  2.4°  
θ_{13,CKM}  CKM 13mixing angle  0.0035  0.2°  
δ_{CKM}  CKM CPviolating Phase  0.995  57°  
m_{e} / m_{P}  Electron mass  4.18546×10^{−23}  511 keV/c^{2}  
m_{νe} / m_{P}  Electron neutrino mass  below 1.6×10^{−28}  below 2 eV/c^{2}  
m_{μ} / m_{P}  Muon mass  8.65418×10^{−21}  105.7 MeV/c^{2}  
m_{νμ} / m_{P}  Muon neutrino mass  below 1.6×10^{−28}  below 2 eV/c^{2}  
m_{τ} / m_{P}  Tau mass  1.45535×10^{−19}  1.78 GeV/c^{2}  
m_{ντ} / m_{P}  Tau neutrino mass  below 1.6×10^{−28}  below 2 eV/c^{2}  
θ_{12,PMNS}  PMNS 12mixing angle  ±0.0175 0.5973  ±1° 34.22  
θ_{23,PMNS}  PMNS 23mixing angle  ±0.12 0.785  ±7.1° 45  
θ_{13,PMNS}  PMNS 13mixing angle  ≈0.077  ≈4.4°  
δ_{PMNS}  PMNS CPviolating Phase  Unknown  
α  fine structure constant  0.00729735  1/137.036  
α_{s}  strong coupling constant  ≈1  ≈1  
m_{W±} / m_{P}  W boson mass  6.5841±0.0012×10^{−18}  80.385±0.015 GeV/c^{2}  
m_{Z0} / m_{P}  Z boson mass  7.46888±0.00016×10^{−18}  91.1876±0.002 GeV/c^{2}  
m_{H} / m_{P}  Higgs boson mass  ≈1.02×10^{−17}  125.09±0.24 GeV/c^{2} 
Cosmological constant
One constant is required for cosmology:
 the cosmological constant (in terms of Planck units) of Einstein's equations for general relativity, having a value of approximately 10^{−122}.
Barrow and Tipler
Barrow and Tipler (1986) anchor their broadranging discussion of astrophysics, cosmology, quantum physics, teleology, and the anthropic principle in the fine structure constant, the protontoelectron mass ratio (which they, along with Barrow (2002), call β), and the coupling constants for the strong force and gravitation.
Martin Rees's Six Numbers
Martin Rees, in his book Just Six Numbers, mulls over the following six dimensionless constants, whose values he deems fundamental to presentday physical theory and the known structure of the universe:
 N ≈ 10^{36}: the ratio of the fine structure constant (the dimensionless coupling constant for electromagnetism) to the gravitational coupling constant, the latter defined using two protons. In Barrow and Tipler (1986) and elsewhere in Wikipedia, this ratio is denoted α/α_{G}. N governs the relative importance of gravity and electrostatic attraction/repulsion in explaining the properties of baryonic matter;^{[2]}
 ε ≈ 0.007: The fraction of the mass of four protons that is released as energy when fused into a helium nucleus. ε governs the energy output of stars, and is determined by the coupling constant for the strong force;^{[3]}
 Ω ≈ 0.3: the ratio of the actual density of the universe to the critical (minimum) density required for the universe to eventually collapse under its gravity. Ω determines the ultimate fate of the universe. If Ω>1, the universe will experience a Big Crunch. If Ω < 1, the universe will expand forever;^{[2]}
 λ ≈ 0.7: The ratio of the energy density of the universe, due to the cosmological constant, to the critical density of the universe. Others denote this ratio by ;^{[4]}
 Q ≈ 10^{−5}: The energy required to break up and disperse an instance of the largest known structures in the universe, namely a galactic cluster or supercluster, expressed as a fraction of the energy equivalent to the rest mass m of that structure, namely mc^{2};^{[5]}
 D = 3: the number of macroscopic spatial dimensions.
N and ε govern the fundamental interactions of physics. The other constants (D excepted) govern the size, age, and expansion of the universe. These five constants must be estimated empirically. D, on the other hand, is necessarily a nonzero natural number and cannot be measured. Hence most physicists would not deem it a dimensionless physical constant of the sort discussed in this entry.
Any plausible fundamental physical theory must be consistent with these six constants, and must either derive their values from the mathematics of the theory, or accept their values as empirical.
See also
 Cabibbo–Kobayashi–Maskawa matrix (Cabibbo angle)
 Coupling constant
 Dimensionless quantity
 Finestructure constant
 Gravitational coupling constant
 Neutrino oscillation
 Physical cosmology
 Standard Model
 Weinberg angle
 Finetuned Universe
 Koide formula
References
 ↑ http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/ NIST
 ↑ ^{2.0} ^{2.1} Rees, M. (2000), p. .
 ↑ Rees, M. (2000), p. 53.
 ↑ Rees, M. (2000), p. 110.
 ↑ Rees, M. (2000), p. 118.
Bibliography
 Martin Rees, 1999. Just Six Numbers: The Deep Forces that Shape the Universe. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson. ISBN 0753810220
External articles
 General
 James R Johnson, 2015, "Discovering Nature's Hidden Relationships, an Unattainable Goal?"
 John D. Barrow, 2002. The Constants of Nature; From Alpha to Omega – The Numbers that Encode the Deepest Secrets of the Universe. Pantheon Books. ISBN 0375422218.
 Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
 Michio Kaku, 1994. Hyperspace: A Scientific Odyssey Through Parallel Universes, Time Warps, and the Tenth Dimension. Oxford University Press.
 Fundamental Physical Constants from NIST
 Values of fundamental constants. CODATA, 2002.
 John Baez, 2002, "How Many Fundamental Constants Are There?"
 Plouffe. Simon, 2004, "A search for a mathematical expression for mass ratios using a large database."
 Articles on variance of the fundamental constants
 John Bahcall, Charles Steinhardt, and David Schlegel, 2004, "Does the finestructure constant vary with cosmological epoch?" Astrophys. J. 600: 520.
 John D. Barrow and Webb, J. K., "Inconstant Constants – Do the inner workings of nature change with time?" Scientific American (June 2005).
 Michael Duff, 2002 "Comment on timevariation of fundamental constants."
 Marion, H., et al. 2003, "A search for variations of fundamental constants using atomic fountain clocks," Phys.Rev.Lett. 90: 150801.
 Martins, J.A.P. et al., 2004, "WMAP constraints on varying α and the promise of reionization," Phys.Lett. B585: 29–34.
 Olive, K.A., et al., 2002, "Constraints on the variations of the fundamental couplings," Phys.Rev. D66: 045022.
 Uzan, JP, 2003, "The fundamental constants and their variation: observational status and theoretical motivations," Rev.Mod.Phys. 75: 403.
 Webb, J.K. et al., 2001, "Further evidence for cosmological evolution of the finestructure constant," Phys. Rev. Lett. 87: 091301.