Emmaus Nicopolis

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search
The Byzantine Basilica of Emmaus Nicopolis (5th-7th centuries C.E.), restored by Crusaders during the 12th century
Emmaus Nikopolis is located in the West Bank
Emmaus Nikopolis
Emmaus Nikopolis
Location of Emmaus Nikopolis in the West Bank

Emmaus Nicopolis (lit. "Emmaus City of Victory") was the Roman name for a city associated with the Emmaus of the New Testament, where Jesus is said to have appeared after his death and resurrection. In the modern age, the site was the location of the Palestinian Arab village of Imwas, near the Latrun junction, between Jerusalem and Tel Aviv, before its depopulation in 1967. Emmaus Nicopolis was the name of the city from the 3rd century CE until the conquest of Palestine by the Muslim forces of the Rashidun Caliphate in 639. The site today is inside Canada Park in the West Bank, and maintained by the Jewish National Fund of Canada.[1]

Location

Emmaus Nicopolis appears on Roman geographical maps. The Peutinger Table situates it about 31 kilometres (19 mi) west of Jerusalem, while the Ptolemy map shows it at a distance of 32 kilometres (20 mi) from the city. This location is confirmed by ancient sources and translations of the Gospel of Luke (e. g. Codex Sinaiticus), which give the distance between biblical Emmaus and Jerusalem as 160 stadia. The geographical position of Emmaus is described in the Jerusalem Talmud, Tractate Sheviit 9.2:[2]

From Bet Horon to the Sea is one domain. Yet is it one domain without regions? Rabbi Johanan said, ‘Still there is Mountain, Lowland, and Valley. From Bet Horon to Emmaus it is Mountain, from Emmaus to Lydda Lowland, from Lydda to the Sea Valley. Then there should be four stated? They are adjacent’.

Etymology

In Hebrew, Emmaus was known as "Hammat" or "Hamta", which means "hot spring." Emmaus is mentioned by this name in Midrash Zutta for Song of Songs 6,8 and Midrash Rabba for Lamentations 1,45.[3] The name was hellenized during the 2nd century BCE and appears in Jewish and Greek texts in many variations: Ammaus, Ammaum, Emmaus, Emmaum, Maus, Amus, etc.: Άμμαούμ, Άμμαούς, Έμμαούμ, Έμμαούς, אמאוס, אמאום, עמאוס, עמאום, עמוס, מאום, אמהום[citation needed]

Religious significance

Emmaus is mentioned in the Gospel of Luke[4] as the village where Jesus appeared to his disciples after his crucifixtion and resurrection:

That very day two of them were going to a village (one hundred and) sixty stadia away from Jerusalem called Emmaus, and they were speaking about all the things that had occurred. And it happened that while they were speaking and debating, Jesus himself drew near and walked with them, but their eyes were prevented from recognizing him … As they approached the village to which they were going, he gave the impression that he was going on further. But they urged him, ‘Stay with us, for it is nearly evening and the day is declining.’ So he went in to stay with them. And it happened that, while he was with them at table, he took bread, said the blessing, broke it, and gave it to them. With that their eyes were opened and they recognized him.

History

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

Due to its strategic position, Emmaus played an important administrative, military and economic role in history. The first mention of Emmaus occurs in the 1st book of Maccabees, chapters 3-4, in the context of Judas the Maccabee’s wars against the Greeks (2nd century BCE).

During the Hasmonean period, Emmaus became a regional administrative centre (toparchy) in the Ayalon Valley.[5] Josephus Flavius mentions Emmaus in his writings several times.[6] He speaks about the destruction of Emmaus by the Romans in the year 4 B. C.[7] The importance of the city was recognized by the Emperor Vespasian who established a fortified camp there in 68 CE to house the fifth ("Macedonian") legion,[8] populating it with 800 veterans.[9]

After the defeat of the Bar-Kochba’s revolt in the first half of the 2nd century CE, more Romans and some Samaritans settled in Emmaus.

<templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />

The Flavians also settled veterans at Emmaeus at the edge of the coastal plain west of Jerusalem, and they founded the new city of Flavia Neapolis in Samaria.Clayton Miles Lehmann [10]

In 131 CE, the city was destroyed by an earthquake. It was rebuilt and renamed Nicopolis ("City of Victory") by Elagabalus in 221 CE, becoming the chief polis in a region that bore its name. Robinson writes that the town was rebuilt "by the exertions of the writer Julius Africanus". In 222 CE, a basilica was erected there, which was rebuilt first by the Byzantines and later by the Crusaders.[11] Remains of a Samaritan synagogue point the presence of a Samaritan community in the city in the late Roman period.

Indeed, in the early 3rd century, a Christian scholar and writer born in Jerusalem, Julius Africanus, lived in Emmaus.[12] According to Eusebius of Caesarea, St. Jerome, Philip of Side and others, Africanus led a delegation of local residents to the Roman emperor Elagabalus, obtaining for Emmaus the status of a city (polis) and the name of "Nicopolis," which it bore during the late Roman period and throughout the Byzantine period. Some scholars like Theodore Mommsen think that in that occasion the city could have been promoted to "Colonia", even because populated by descendants of the 800 Roman veterans who settled there under Vespasian.

As St. Eusebius writes,

Emmaus, whence was Cleopas who is mentioned by the Evangelist Luke. Today it is Nicopolis, a famous city of Palestine.[13]

During the Byzantine period Emmaus-Nicopolis became a big city and a bishopric. A large church complex was erected on the spot of the apparition of the risen Christ, which served as a place of pilgrimage, and whose ruins still exist today.

After the Muslim conquest in the 7th century, Emmaus went back to being called "Amwas" or "Imwas", but lost its importance as a regional centre.

During the Crusader period, the Christian presence resumed at Emmaus, and the Byzantine church was restored. However, the memory of the apparition of the risen Jesus at Emmaus also started to be celebrated in three other places in the Holy Land: Motza (c. 6 kilometres (4 mi) west of Jerusalem), Qubeibe (c. 11 kilometres (7 mi) northwest of Jerusalem) Abu Ghosh (c. 11 kilometres (7 mi) west of Jerusalem).

The Arab village of Amwas was identified once again as the biblical Emmaus and the Roman-Byzantine Nicopolis by scholars in the 19th century, including Edward Robinson(1838–1852),[14][15] M.-V. Guérin (1868), Charles Simon Clermont-Ganneau (1874), and J.-B. Guillemot (1880–1887). In addition, a local saint named Blessed Mariam of Jesus Crucified, a nun of the Carmelite monastery of Bethlehem, had a revelation in 1878 in which Jesus indicated Amwas was the Gospel’s Emmaus. Thanks to this revelation, the holy place of Emmaus was acquired by the Carmelite monastery from the Muslims, excavations were carried out, and the flow of pilgrims to Emmaus-Nicopolis resumed.

Following the 1948 partition of Palestine to form the state of Israel, the village of Amwas fell within the West Bank territory under Jordanian control. However it was conquered by Israeli forces during the Six Day War of 1967, and its mixed Muslim and Christian Arab population left. The area then became a part of Canada Park.[16]

Archaeology

Archaeological excavations in Imwas started in the late 19th century and continue nowadays: Clermont-Ganneau (1874), J.-B. Guillemot (1883–1887), Dominican Fathers L.-H. Vincent & F.-M. Abel (1924–1930),[17] Y. Hirschfeld (1975),[18] M. Gichon (1978),[19] Mikko Louhivuori, M. Piccirillo, V. Michel, K.-H. Fleckenstein (since 1994).[20] During excavations in Canada Park ( Ayalon forest) ruins of Emmaus fortifications from the Hasmonean era were discovered, along with a Roman bathhouse from the 3rd century CE, Jewish burial caves from the 1st century CE, Roman-Byzantine hydraulic installations, oil presses and tombs. Other findings were coins, oil lamps, vessels, jewellery. The eastern (rear) three-apsidal wall of the Byzantine church was cleared, with an external baptistery and polychrome mosaics, as well as walls of the Crusader church which were built against the central Byzantine apse (12th century). In the area of Emmaus, several Hebrew, Samaritan, Greek and Latin inscriptions carved on stones have been found.[citation needed]

Identification with the Gospel site

Most manuscripts of the Gospel of Luke which came down to us indicate the distance of 60 stadia (c. 11 km) between Jerusalem and Emmaus. However, there are several manuscripts which state the distance as 160 stadia (31 km). These include the uncial manuscripts א (Codex Sinaiticus), Θ, Ν, Κ, Π, 079 and cursive (minuscule) manuscripts 158, 175, 223, 237, 420, as well as ancient lectionnaries [21] and translations into Latin (some manuscripts of the Vetus Latina,[22] high-quality manuscripts of the Vulgate [23]), in Aramaic,[24] Georgian and Armenian languages.[25] The version of 60 stadia has been adopted for the printed editions of the Gospel of Luke since the 16th century. The main argument against the version of 160 stadia claims that it is impossible to walk such a distance in one day. In keeping with the principle of Lectio difficilior, lectio verior, the most difficult version is presumed to be genuine, since ancient copyists of the Bible were inclined to change the text in order to facilitate understanding, but not vice versa. One should also note that it is possible to walk from Jerusalem to Emmaus-Nicopolis and back in one day.[citation needed]

The ancient Jewish sources (1 Maccabees, Josephus Flavius, Talmud and Midrash) mention only one village called Emmaus in the area of Jerusalem: Emmaus of Ajalon Valley.[26] For example, in the "Jewish War" (4, 8, 1) Josephus Flavius mentions that Vespasian placed the 5th Macedonian Legion in Emmaus. This has been confirmed by archaeologists who have discovered inscribed tombstones of the Legion’s soldiers in the area of Emmaus-Nicopolis.[27] (The village of Motza, located 30 stadia (c. 6 kilometres (4 mi)) away from Jerusalem, is mentioned in medieval Greek manuscripts of the "Jewish war" of Josephus Flavius (7,6,6) under the name of Ammaus, apparently as a result of copyists’ mistake).[28][29]

The ancient Christian tradition of the Church fathers, as well as pilgrims to the Holy Land during the Roman-Byzantine period, unanimously recognized Nicopolis as the Emmaus in the Gospel of Luke (Origen (presumably), Eusebius of Caesarea,[30] St. Jerome,[31] Hesychius of Jerusalem,[32] Theophanes the Confessor,[33] Sozomen,[34] Theodosius,[35] etc.).

See also

References

  1. First autumn crocus blooms in Canada Park
  2. H. Guggenheimer, trans., Berlin-N.Y. 2001, p.609
  3. https://sites.google.com/site/emmausnicopolis/
  4. Luke 24:13-16, 28-31
  5. see Josephus Flavius, "The Jewish War" 3,3,5
  6. "The Jewish War" 2, 4, 3; 2, 20, 4; 3, 3, 5; 4, 8, 1; 5, 1, 6; "The Antiquities of the Jews" 14, 11, 2; 14, 15, 7 ; 17, 10, 7-9)
  7. "Antiquities of the Jews" 17, 10, 7-9
  8. Sharon, 1997, p. 79
  9. Josephus, De Bello Iudaico Bk 7,6:6.
  10. History of Roman Palestine)
  11. Sharon, 1997, p. 80
  12. http://www.christusrex.org/www1/ofm/mad/discussion/069discuss.html
  13. "Onomasticon," 90:15-17, a text written in 290-325 A.D. , G. S. P. Freeman-Grenville, trans., Jerusalem, 2003
  14. Robinson and Smith, 1841, vol 2, p. 363
  15. Robinson and Smith, 1856, pp. 146-148
  16. Segev, 2007, pp. 306-309
  17. Vincent,Abel "Emmaüs", Paris, 1932
  18. Y. Hirschfeld, "A Hidraulic Installation in the Water-Supply System of Emmaus-Nicopolis", IEJ, 1978
  19. M. Gichon, "Roman Bath-houses in Eretz Israel", Qadmoniot 11, 1978
  20. K.-H. Fleckenstein, M. Louhivuori, R. Riesner, "Emmaus in Judäa", Giessen-Basel, 2003.ISBN 3-7655-9811-9
  21. L844, L2211
  22. e.g. Codex Sangermanensis
  23. including the oldest of them, Codex Fuldensis
  24. Palestinian Evangeliary
  25. M.-J. Lagrange, "Evangile selon saint Luc", Paris, 1921, p.p.617-618 [1], Wieland Willker, "A Textual Commentary on the Greek Gospels",Vol. 3 [2]
  26. Strack, Billerbeck, "Kommentar zum Neuen Testament aus Talmud & Midrasch", vol II, München, 1924,1989, p.p. 269-271. ISBN 3-406-02725-3
  27. See : P. M. Séjourné, "Nouvelles de Jérusalem", RB 1897, p. 131; E. Michon, "Inscription d'Amwas", RB 1898, p. 269-271; J. H. Landau, "Two Inscribed Tombstones", "Atiqot", vol. XI, Jerusalem, 1976.
  28. Robinson and Smith, 1856, p. 149
  29. Schlatter, "Einige Ergebnisse aus Niese's Ausgabe des Josephus": ZDPV, XIX (1896), p. 222; Vincent & Abel, op. cit. p.p. 284-285
  30. "Onomasticon"
  31. Letter 108, PL XXII, 833 and other texts
  32. Quaestiones », PG XCIII, 1444
  33. "Chronografia", PG CVIII, 160
  34. "Ecclesiastical History", PG LXVII, 180
  35. "De situ Terrae sanctae", 139

Bibliography

  • Emmaus Nicopolis, official site [3]
  • Vincent, Abel "Emmaüs", Paris, 1932 full text
  • P. Duvignau, "Emmaüs, le site - le mystère", Paris, 1937.full text
  • V. Michel, "Le complexe ecclésiastique d'Emmaüs-Nicopolis",Paris, Sorbonne,1996–1997, pro manuscripto.
  • K.-H. Fleckenstein, M. Louhivuori, R. Riesner, "Emmaus in Judäa", Giessen-Basel, 2003.ISBN 3-7655-9811-9.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

External links

Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.