Enthalpy of fusion

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

A log-log plot of the enthalpies of melting and boiling versus the melting and boiling temperatures for the pure elements. The linear relationship between the enthalpy of melting and the melting temperature is known as Richard's rule.
Enthalpies of melting and boiling for pure elements versus temperatures of transition, demonstrating Trouton's rule.

The enthalpy of fusion of a substance, also known as (latent) heat of fusion, is the change in its enthalpy resulting from providing energy, typically heat, to a specific quantity of the substance to change its state from a solid to a liquid at constant pressure. This energy includes the contribution required to make room for any associated change in volume by displacing its environment against ambient pressure. The temperature at which the phase transition occurs is the melting point. By convention, the pressure is assumed to be Lua error in Module:Convert at line 1851: attempt to index local 'en_value' (a nil value). unless otherwise specified.

The 'enthalpy' of fusion is a latent heat, because during melting the introduction of heat cannot be observed as a temperature change, as the temperature remains constant during the process. The latent heat of fusion is the enthalpy change of any amount of substance when it melts. When the heat of fusion is referenced to a unit of mass, it is usually called the specific heat of fusion, while the molar heat of fusion refers to the enthalpy change per amount of substance in moles.

The liquid phase has a higher internal energy than the solid phase. This means energy must be supplied to a solid in order to melt it and energy is released from a liquid when it freezes, because the molecules in the liquid experience weaker intermolecular forces and so have a higher potential energy (a kind of bond-dissociation energy for intermolecular forces).

When liquid water is cooled, its temperature falls steadily until it drops just below the line of freezing point at 0 °C. The temperature then remains constant at the freezing point while the water crystallizes. Once the water is completely frozen, its temperature continues to fall.

The enthalpy of fusion is almost always a positive quantity; helium is the only known exception.[1] Helium-3 has a negative enthalpy of fusion at temperatures below 0.3 K. Helium-4 also has a very slightly negative enthalpy of fusion below 0.77 K (−272.380 °C). This means that, at appropriate constant pressures, these substances freeze with the addition of heat.[2] In the case of 4He, this pressure range is between 24.992 and 25.00 atm (2,533 kPa).[3]


Standard enthalpy change of fusion of period three.
Standard enthalpy change of fusion of period two of the periodic table of elements.
Substance Heat of fusion
(cal/g)
Heat of fusion
(J/g)
water 79.72 333.55
methane 13.96 58.99
propane 19.11 79.96
glycerol 47.95 200.62
formic acid 66.05 276.35
acetic acid 45.90 192.09
acetone 23.42 97.99
benzene 30.45 127.40
myristic acid 47.49 198.70
palmitic acid 39.18 163.93
stearic acid 47.54 198.91
Paraffin wax (C25H52) 47.8-52.6 200–220

These values are mostly from the CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 62nd edition. The conversion between cal/g and J/g in the above table uses the thermochemical calorie (calth) = 4.184 joules rather than the International Steam Table calorie (calINT) = 4.1868 joules.

Examples

1) To heat 1 kg (about 0.95 liter) of water from 283.15 K to 303.15 K (10 °C to 30 °C) requires 83.6 kJ. However, to melt ice also requires energy. To heat ice from 273.15 K to water at 293.15 K (0 °C to 20 °C) requires:

(1) 333.55 J/g (heat of fusion of ice) = 333.55 kJ/kg = 333.55 kJ for 1 kg of ice to melt
PLUS
(2) 4.18 J/(g·K) × 20K = 4.18 kJ/(kg·K) × 20K = 83.6 kJ for 1 kg of water to increase in temperature by 20 K
= 417.15 kJ

Thus one part ice at 0 °C will cool almost exactly 4 parts water from 20 °C to 0 °C.

2) Silicon has a heat of fusion of 50.21 kJ/mol. 50 kW of power can supply the energy required to melt about 100 kg of silicon in one hour, after it is brought to the melting point temperature:

50 kW = 50kJ/s = 180000kJ/h

180000kJ/h * (1 mol Si)/50.21kJ * 28gSi/(mol Si) * 1kgSi/1000gSi = 100.4kg/h

Solubility prediction

The heat of fusion can also be used to predict solubility for solids in liquids. Provided an ideal solution is obtained the mole fraction (x_2) of solute at saturation is a function of the heat of fusion, the melting point of the solid (T_{\mathit{fus}}) and the temperature (T) of the solution:

 \ln x_2  = - \frac {\Delta H^\circ_{\mathit{fus}}}{R} \left(\frac{1}{T}- \frac{1}{T_{\mathit{fus}}}\right)

Here, R is the gas constant. For example, the solubility of paracetamol in water at 298 K is predicted to be:

 x_2  = \exp {\left(- \frac {28100 \mbox{ J mol}^{-1}} {8.314 \mbox{ J K}^{-1} \mbox{ mol}^{-1}}\left(\frac{1}{298}- \frac{1}{442}\right)\right)}= 0.0248

This equals to a solubility in grams per liter of:

 \frac{0.0248*\frac{1000 \mbox{ g}}{18.053 \mbox{ mol}^{-1}}}{1-0.0248}*151.17 \mbox{ mol}^{-1} = 213.4

which is a deviation from the real solubility (240 g/L) of 11%. This error can be reduced when an additional heat capacity parameter is taken into account.[4]

Proof

At equilibrium the chemical potentials for the pure solvent and pure solid are identical:

\mu^\circ_{solid} = \mu^\circ_{solution}\,

or

\mu^\circ_{solid} = \mu^\circ_{liquid} + RT\ln X_2\,

with R\, the gas constant and T\, the temperature.

Rearranging gives:

RT\ln X_2  = - (\mu^\circ_{liquid} -  \mu^\circ_{solid})\,

and since

 \Delta G^\circ_{\mathit{fus}}  = - (\mu^\circ_{liquid} -  \mu^\circ_{solid})\,

the heat of fusion being the difference in chemical potential between the pure liquid and the pure solid, it follows that

RT\ln X_2  = - ( \Delta G^\circ_{\mathit{fus}})\,

Application of the Gibbs–Helmholtz equation:

\left( \frac{\partial ( \frac{\Delta G^\circ_{\mathit{fus}} } {T} ) } {\partial T} \right)_{p\,} = - \frac {\Delta H^\circ_{\mathit{fus}}} {T^2}

ultimately gives:

\left( \frac{\partial ( \ln X_2 ) } {\partial T} \right)  =  \frac {\Delta H^\circ_{\mathit{fus}}} {RT^2}

or:

 \partial \ln X_2   =  \frac {\Delta H^\circ_{\mathit{fus}}} {RT^2}*\delta T

and with integration:

 \int^{x_2=x_2}_{x_2 = 1} \delta \ln X_2 = \ln x_2  = \int_{T_{\mathit{fus}}}^T \frac {\Delta H^\circ_{\mathit{fus}}} {RT^2}*\Delta T

the end result is obtained:

 \ln x_2  = - \frac {\Delta H^\circ_{\mathit{fus}}} {R}\left(\frac{1}{T}- \frac{1}{T_{\mathit{fus}}}\right)

See also

Notes

  1. Atkins & Jones 2008, p. 236.
  2. Ott & Boerio-Goates 2000, pp. 92–93.
  3. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  4. Measurement and Prediction of Solubility of Paracetamol in Water-Isopropanol Solution. Part 2. Prediction H. Hojjati and S. Rohani Org. Process Res. Dev.; 2006; 10(6) pp 1110–1118; (Article) doi:10.1021/op060074g

References

  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.