European Civil Service

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search
European Union
Flag of the European Union

This article is part of a series on the
politics and government
of the European Union

The European Civil Service is the civil service serving the European Commission.

Civil servants are recruited directly into the institutions after being selected by competitions set by the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO), the official selection office. They are allocated to departments, known as Directorates-General (DGs), each covering one or more related policy areas.

Its approximate counterpart in the Council of the European Union would be the General Secretariat of the Council.


The Commission is divided into departments known as Directorates-General (DGs or the services), each headed by a director-general, and various other services. Each covers a specific policy area or service such as External Relations or Translation and is under the responsibility of a European Commissioner. DGs prepare proposals for their Commissioners which can then be put forward for voting in the college of Commissioners.[1]

Whilst the Commission's DGs cover similar policy areas to the ministries in national governments, European Civil Servants have not necessarily been trained, or worked, in a national civil service before employment in the EU. On entry, they do not therefore share a common administrative culture.

List of Directorates-General

The Directorates-General are divided into four groups: Policy DGs, External relations DGs, General Service DGs and Internal Service DGs. Internally, the DGs are referred to by their abbreviations; provided below.

Departments (DGs)[2]
DG Abb. Relevant Commissioner
Agriculture and Rural Development AGRI European Commissioner for Agriculture and Rural Development
Budget BUDG European Commissioner for Financial Programming and the Budget
Climate Action CLIMA European Commissioner for Climate Action
Connect CNCT European Commissioner for Digital Agenda
Communication COMM European Commissioner for Communication
Competition COMP European Commissioner for Competition
Economic and Financial Affairs ECFIN European Commissioner for Economic and Financial Affairs
Education and Culture EAC European Commissioner for Education, Culture, Multilingualism and Youth
Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion EMPL European Commissioner for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion
Energy ENER European Commissioner for Energy
Neighbourhood and Enlargement Negotiations NEAR European Commissioner for Enlargement and European Neighbourhood Policy
Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs GROWTH European Commissioner for Industry and Entrepreneurship
Environment ENV European Commissioner for the Environment
EuropeAid Development and Cooperation DEVCO European Commissioner for Development
Eurostat ESTAT European Commissioner for Taxation and Customs Union, Audit and Anti-Fraud
Foreign Policy Instruments Service EEAS High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy
Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union FISMA European Commissioner for Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union
Health and Consumers SANCO European Commissioner for Health and Consumer Policy
Home Affairs HOME European Commissioner for Home Affairs
Humanitarian Aid ECHO European Commissioner for International Cooperation, Humanitarian Aid and Crisis Response
Human Resources and Security HR European Commissioner for Inter-Institutional Relations and Administration
Informatics DIGIT
Internal Market and Services MARKT European Commissioner for Internal Market and Services
Interpretation SCIC
Joint Research Centre JRC European Commissioner for Research, Innovation and Science
Justice JUST European Commissioner for Justice, Fundamental Rights and Citizenship
Maritime Affairs and Fisheries MARE European Commissioner for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries
Mobility and Transport MOVE European Commissioner for Transport
Regional Policy REGIO European Commissioner for Regional Policy
Research and Innovation RTD European Commissioner for Research, Innovation and Science
Secretariat General SG
Taxation and Customs Union TAXUD European Commissioner for Taxation and Customs Union, Audit and Anti-Fraud
Trade TRADE European Commissioner for Trade
Translation DGT

List of services

Bureau of European Policy Advisers BEPA
Library and e-Resources Centre
European Anti-Fraud Office OLAF
European Commission Data Protection Officer
Historical archives
Infrastructures and Logistics - Brussels OIB
Infrastructures and Logistics - Luxembourg OIL
Internal Audit Service IAS
Legal Service SJ
Office For Administration And Payment Of Individual Entitlements PMO
Publications Office OP


During the 1980s, the Commission was primarily dominated by French, German and Italian cultural influences, including a strictly hierarchical organisation. Commissioners and Directors-General were referred to by their title (in French) with greater prestige for those of higher ranks. As one former servant, Derk Jan Eppink has put it, even after new servants had passed the tough entrance exams: "Those at the top counted for everything. Those at the bottom counted for nothing."[3] The chef de cabinet of President Jacques Delors, Pascal Lamy, was particularly notable for his immense influence over other civil servants. He became known as the Beast of the Berlaymont, the Gendarme and the Exocet due to his habit of ordering civil servants, even Directors-General (head of departments) "precisely what to do - or else." He was seen as ruling Delors's office with a "rod of iron", with no-one able to bypass or manipulate him and those who tried being "banished to one of the less pleasant European postings".[4]

However, since the enlargement of the EU, and therefore the arrival of staff from the many newer Member States, there has been a change in the culture of the civil service. New civil servants from northern and eastern states brought in new influences while the Commission's focus has shifted more to "participation" and "consultation". A more egalitarian culture took over with Commissioners no longer having a "status equivalent to a sun God" and with this new populism, the first women were appointed to the Commission in the 1990s and the service gained its first female secretary general in 2006 (Catherine Day). In stark contrast to the 1980s, it is not uncommon to see men without ties and children playing football in the corridors.[5]


Staff are divided into a set of grades: from AD 5, the most junior administrator grade, to AD 16, which is a director-general (AD = administrator). Alongside the AD category is AST (assistant). It is now possible for civil servants to be promoted from AST to AD grade, not previously possible (see below); however in practice the grades remain entrenched.[6] While promotion is in theory according to merit, many management posts are now taken by officials 'parachuted in' from member states. Moreover, staff reforms introduced in 2004 have severely reduced the possibilities for career progression and have created divisions within the service, with pre-2004 entrants enjoying greater pay and privileges. According to the Commission's own internal statistics, even though new officials possess an average of eight years work experience, it would take an average of over 40 years to climb from AD 5 to AD 16.

Prior to this new system, introduced in the 2000s (decade), civil servants were traditionally divided into four categories. "A" was policy making (what is now AD), "B' was implementing, "C" was secretarial and "D" was drivers and messengers (B, C and D are now all part of the AST category). There were various grades in each category. The major ranks used to be in the form of A7 (new appointment) to A1 (director-general).[6]


The Commission's civil service is headed by a Secretary General, currently Catherine Day.[7] According to figures published by the Commission, 23,600 persons were employed by the Commission as officials and temporary agents in April 2013. In addition to these, 9066 "external staff" were employed; these are largely people employed on time-limited contracts (called "contractual agents" in the jargon), staff seconded from national administrations (called "Detached National Experts"), or trainees (called "stagiaires"). The single largest DG is the Directorate-General for Translation, with 2261 staff.[8]

European civil servants are sometimes referred to in the anglophone press as "Eurocrats" (a term coined by Richard Mayne, a journalist and personal assistant to the first Commission president, Walter Hallstein).;[9] high-ranking officials are sometimes referred to as "European Mandarins".[citation needed]


There are staff from all member states, with the largest group being Belgian (17.8% - 4,193), with French and Italian servants following with about 2,500 (10%).[8]

Most administration is based in the Belgian capital,[8] Often, those states under-represented in the service tend to have more of their nationals in the higher ranks.[10]


One of the entry qualifications for the European civil service is that the candidate speak at least two of the official European languages, one of which must be English, French or German. Candidates whose mother tongue is English, French or German must pass the competition for entry in one of the other two official languages.

Prior to their first promotion, officials must demonstrate competence in a third EU official language.

A candidate also needs to have a first degree in any discipline. The services have traditionally hired candidates with degrees in Law, Economics, or Audit; competition is tougher for graduates of all other disciplines, although the procedure for the open competitions, known as "Concours", is now under review.

Salary and allowances

EU civil and other servants work 40 hours a week, though they are theoretically available 24/7. They receive a minimum of 24 days of leave a year (maximum of 30), with additional leave entitlements on grounds of age, grade but no longer distance from home country (this is now a flat-rate 2.5 days for all).

The lowest grades receive between €1.618,83 brutto (FG 1 step 1)[11] each month, while the highest grades (AD 15-16 - i.e. Directors General at the end of their career) receives between €14,822.86 and €16,094.79 a month. This salary is taxed by the EU, rather than at the national level. Taxation varies between 8% and 45% depending on individual circumstances. This is paid into the Community budget.[12]

Earnings are augmented by allowances, such as allowances for those living outside their own country, those who are the principal earner in their household, those with children in full-time education, and those who are moving home in order to take up a position or leaving the service. Earnings are also lowered by various additional taxes (i.e. "Special Levy" alias 'crisis levy' introduced in 1973 and increasing regularly every year) and indexes (for EU staff working out-side Brussels).

For a contribution of 2% basic salary, employees are provided with health insurance which covers a maximum of 85% of expenses (100% for serious injury).[12] Employees have the right to a parental leave of six months per person and child during which they obtain an allowance and have (as of January 2014) the possibility of an extension by further 6 months with a smaller allowance.[13]

Salaries were considerably reduced for new entrants from 1 May 2004 onwards as a result of a significant number of reforms effected by Commissioner Neil Kinnock. Staff undertaking the same work may receive very different salaries, depending on their date of recruitment. Careers are also sharply affected, with new staff tending to constitute a 'second division' of workers with limited managerial prospects. As a consequence of these changes, the institutions recruit with difficulty staff from certain countries like UK, Luxembourg, Denmark as wages are the same or lower than in the home country. In some countries (like Luxembourg) the lowest wages (FG I - FG II) are even under the legal minimum salary in the respective country, which raise the question about legality of such terms of employment.

In January 2010, The European Commission took the EU member states to court over the Member States' refusal to honour a long-standing formula under which wages for the staff of the European institutions are indexed to the salaries of national civil servants.[14] The formula led to a salary adjustment of 3.7% but the Council, representing the member states, was only willing to grant a pay rise of 1.85%.[15] In November 2010, the European Court of Justice ruled that there was no legal basis for the Council to set the pay rise to 1.85%.[16] It has been noted that the ECJ judges who would decide in this case would be themselves to benefit from any salary increase agreed.[17] To be noted that the index is published and applied one year and half later, and this delay cause the quarrels like in the 2010 (full crisis) where should be applied the adaptation related to the increases of wages of the national civil servants from 2007-8; while in 2011 the index was already negative (as the national wages has been lowered).


Employees contribute about 11.3% of their basic salary to a pension scheme.[18] Pensions are paid as a percentage of the final basic salary, with a ceiling of 70%, at an accrual rate of 1.8% per year of service[19] (with a higher accrual rate of 1.9% per year of service for those who entered service between 1 May 2004 and 31 December 2013, and 2% per year of service for those who entered service before 1 May 2004[13]). The pensionable age is 66 years for staff entering service as of 1 January 2014, is between 63 and 65 years for those who entered service not earlier than 1 May 2004 but before 1 January 2014, and is between 60 and 65 years for those who entered service before 1 May 2004.[13] Early retirement is possible as of 58 years but a pension reduction coefficient of 3.5% is applied for each year before the pensionable age, except that for staff in place on 1 January 2014 the pension reduction coefficient is 1.75 for years not worked above the age of 60.[13]

Before 1 January 2014, the pensionable age had been 63 years for those who entered service on 1 May 2004 or later, and between 60 and 63 years for those who entered service before 1 May 2004. Early retirement was possible as of 55 years for a small percentage of officials, albeit with a reduction of the pension due to the pension reduction coefficient of 3.5% per year before the pensionable age.[20] To mitigate the changes implemented as of 2014, transitional pension rules were put in place for staff in place on 1 January 2014, which included setting the pensionable age for staff between 55 and 60 years of age on 1 January 2014 to lie between 60 and 61 years. Transition measures applied also to early retirement: Staff already aged 54 years or older on 1 January 2014 could still retire, with application of the pension reduction coefficient, in 2014 or 2015 at the age of 56 years or in 2016 at the age of 57 years.[13][21]

Before 1 May 2004, the pensionable age had been 60 years, and when this age was raised in 2004, this was accompanied by transition measures so that it remained unchangedly at 60 for officials aged 50 or more as well as for officials who had already completed 20 years of service or more on 1 May 2004, and it varied from 60 years and 2 months to 62 years and 8 months for officials aged 30 to 49 on 1 May 2004.[20]

Other criticisms

It has been alleged that, for want of a common administrative culture, European Civil Servants are held together by a "common mission" which gives DGs a particularly enthusiastic attitude to the production of draft legislation regardless of the intentions of the Commissioner.[22] They are also notably bound by their common procedures, which have become a sacred rite in the absence of a common administrative culture. The Secretariat-General, knowing all on such procedures, hence have a semi divine status in the Commissions ranking, just below the President's cabinet.[23]

There has been some criticism that the highly fragmented DG structure wastes a considerable amount of time in turf wars as the different departments and Commissioners compete with each other, as is the case in national administrations. Furthermore, the DGs can exercise considerable control over a Commissioner unless the Commissioner learns to assert control over his/her staff.[24][25] The DGs work closely with the Commissioner's cabinet. While the DG has responsibility for preparation of work and documents, the cabinet has responsibility for giving the Commissioner political guidance. However, in practice both seek a share of each other's work.[26] It has been alleged that some DGs try to influence decision making by providing Commissioners with briefing documents as late and large as possible, ensuring that the Commissioner has no time to do anything but accept the version of facts presented by the DG. In doing this the DG is competing with the cabinet, which acts as a "bodyguard" for the Commissioner.[27]

See also


  • Eppink, Derk-Jan (2007). Life of a European Mandarin: Inside the Commission. Translated by Ian Connerty (1st ed.). Tielt, Belgium: Lannoo. ISBN 978-90-209-7022-7.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  1. "Institutions of the EU: The European Commission". Europa (web portal). Retrieved 2007-06-18.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  2. "European Commission: Departments (Directorates-General) and services". Retrieved 3 August 2015.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  3. Eppink, 2007, p.32
  4. Eppink, 2007, p.22-3
  5. Eppink, 2007, p.34-5
  6. 6.0 6.1 Eppink, 2007, p.37
  7. "Interview with European Commission Secretary-General Catherine Day". EurActiv. 2006-09-25. Retrieved 2007-06-17.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  8. 8.0 8.1 8.2 "Civil Service: Staff figures". Europa (web portal). Retrieved 2013-04-26.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  9. Tindall, Gillian (22 December 2009). "Richard Mayne obituary". The Guardian. London. p. 30. Retrieved 22 December 2009.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  10. Eppink, 2007, p.35
  11. Chapter 7, page II-30, Staff Regulation,
  12. 12.0 12.1 COUNCIL REGULATION (EC, EURATOM) No 723/2004, Annex I, Amendment 60
  13. 13.0 13.1 13.2 13.3 13.4 "Summary document on changes relating to Staff Regulations review. Measures included in the compromise text agreed by COREPER on 28 June 2013 and voted in plenary session of the European Parliament on 2 July 2013. Ref. Ares(2013)2583641 - 05/07/2013" (PDF). European Commission. Retrieved 7 November 2014.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  14. [1]
  16. "EU officials win pay rise battle with member states". EuroActiv. 26 November 2010. Retrieved 18 December 2014.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  17. Waterfield, Bruno (2010-01-06). "EU mounts challenge to MEP pay rise cuts". The Daily Telegraph. London.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  18. COUNCIL REGULATION (EU, EURATOM) No 1295/2009 of 22 December 2009 adjusting with effect from 1 July 2009 the rate of contribution to the pension scheme of officials and other servants of the European Union
  19. "Permanent officials". European Commission. Retrieved 7 November 2014.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  20. 20.0 20.1 "Retirement pension and early retirement: Frequently asked questions". European Commission. 6 January 2012. Archived from the original on 24 March 2012.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  21. Irene Souka (July 2013). "Review of the Staff Regulations" (PDF). p. 12.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  22. Eppink, 2007, p.111
  23. Eppink, 2007, p.218
  24. Amies, Nick (2007-09-21). "Former EU Mandarin Spills the Beans on Commission Intrigue". Deutsche Welle. Retrieved 2007-10-17.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  25. Mahony, Honor (2007-10-17). "EU carefully manages PR through 1000s of press releases". EU Observer. Retrieved 2007-10-17.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  26. Eppink, 2007, p.109
  27. Eppink, 2007, p.107-8

Further reading

  • Eppink, Derk-Jan (2007). Life of a European Mandarin: Inside the Commission (1st ed.). Tielt, Belgium: Lannoo. ISBN 978-90-209-7022-7. Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (help)<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>

External links

See also

Center for Adaptation of Civil Service to the Standards of EU - public institution established by the Decree of Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine to facilitate administrative reform in Ukraine and to enhance the adaptation of the civil service to the standards of the European Union.