McArthur Forest Fire Danger Index

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
(Redirected from FFDI)
Jump to: navigation, search


Fire Danger Rating [1]
Category Forest Fire Danger Index Grassland Fire Danger Index
Catastrophic (Code Red) 100 + 150 +
Extreme 75 – 99 100 – 149
Severe 50 – 74 50 – 99
Very High 25 – 49 25 – 49
High 12 – 24 12 – 24
Low–Moderate 0 – 11 0 – 11

The McArthur Forest Fire Danger Index (FFDI) was developed in the 1960s by CSIRO scientist A.G. McArthur to measure the degree of danger of fire in Australian forests. The index combines a record of dryness, based on rainfall and evaporation, with meteorological variables for wind speed, temperature and humidity.[2]

A similar approach was adopted by McArthur for Grassland areas. Luke and McArthur [3] details the early development and use of these indices.

In 1980 Noble et al.[4] produced algorithms based on mathematical equations of best fit. These algorithms have been used since the early 1980s to enable easy computation. However they are often used with input values outside McArthur's intended design, resulting in FFDI values in excess of 100. The power function nature of the algorithm, together with limits of precision in measuring the input variables may result in a large range of uncertainty in the calculated FFDI. For example, in conditions that produce an FFDI of 100, small fluctuations in wind speed and temperature would suggest a +/- 20% range in FFDI.

McArthur tested his meter using low intensity fires on Black Mountain, near Canberra (see Luke and McArthur)with the most extreme conditions being when FFDI was in the 20's range. McArthur specified a wind averaging period of "more than 5 minutes" ("Fire behaviour in eucalypt forests; Australia. Forestry and Timber Bureau : Leaflet ; no. 107).[5] A 10-minute period is the most common period used in Australian wind speed measurements and calculated FFDI values using different wind averaging periods cannot be compared. Since wind speed varies considerably over small distances, "observed" FFDI values will vary even more.

A fire danger index of between 12 and 25 on the index is generally considered a "high" degree of danger, while a day having a danger index of over 50 is considered an "Severe" fire danger rating. Above this level in 2010 a distinction was made between Forest and Grassland fuels. For Forest fuels, an FDI over 75 is categorised as "Extreme" and over 100 as "Catastrophic" (In Victoria the alternative rating name of "Code Red" has been adopted). For Grassland Fuels the threshold FDI values for the Extreme and Catastrophic Ratings was increased to 100 and 150 respectively. However, in Western Australia, which currently only uses the Grassland FDI, the values of 75 and 100 are being used as thresholds as of 2014. Fire Danger Ratings are determined by the responsible fire agency in each jurisdiction, based on weather information provided by the Bureau of Meteorology and fuel information. Other considerations besides the Fire Danger Index, such as the likelihood of lightning ignitions and the severity of wind changes may also be considered by the agencies in determining a Fire Danger Rating.

McArthur used the conditions of the Black Friday fires of 1939 as his example of an 100 index.

The FFDI on Black Saturday, 7 February 2009, reached much higher than the maximum value of 100. At such extremes it is meaningless to specify a particular value of FFDI. After the Black Saturday bushfires the McArthur Forest Fire Danger Index was revised. The category "Catastrophic" or "Code Red" (Victoria) was added to help identify those situations where forest fires will spread so quickly that they present a critical threat to life and safety.

References

  1. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  2. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  3. Luke R.H. and McArthur A.G., "Bushfires in Australia", Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, 1978.
  4. Noble I.R., Bary G.A.A., and Gill A.M. (1980), "McArthur's fire danger meters expressed as equations", Australian Journal of Ecology, 5, pp. 201 - 203.
  5. http://trove.nla.gov.au/work/21914760?q&versionId=26402708