Foot–pound–second system

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search

The foot–pound–second system or FPS system is a system of units built on the three fundamental units foot for length, (avoirdupois) pound for either mass or force (see below) and second for time.[1]


Collectively, the variants of the FPS system were the most common system in technical publications in English until the middle of the 20th century.[1]

Errors can be avoided and translation between the systems facilitated by labelling all physical dimensions consistently with their units. Especially in the context of the FPS system this is sometimes known as the Stroud system after William Stroud, who popularized it.[2]

Three approaches to English mass and force units[3][4]
Base force, length, time weight, length, time mass, length, time
Force (F) F = ma = wa/g F = ma/gc = wa/g F = ma = wa/g
Weight (w) w = mg w = mg/gcm w = mg
System British Gravitational (BG) English Engineering (EE) Absolute English (AE)
Acceleration (a) ft/s2 ft/s2 ft/s2
Mass (m) slug lbm lb
Force (F) lb lbF pdl
Pressure (p) lb/in2 PSI pdl/ft2

Pound as mass unit

When the pound is used as a unit of mass (often denoted as "pound-mass" and abbreviated as "lbm" to avoid confusion), the core of the coherent system is similar and functionally equivalent to the corresponding subsets of the International System of Units (SI), using metre, kilogram and second (MKS), and the earlier centimetre–gram–second system of units (CGS).

In this sub-system, the unit of force is a derived unit known as the poundal.[1]

1\,\text{pdl} = 1\,\text{lb}_m \cdot 1\,\frac{\text{ft}}{\text{s}^2}

In the context of the absolute FPS system, the pound-mass (lbm) is sometimes referred to simply as the pound (lb), although such use is discouraged in favor of the less ambiguous 'lbm' in disciplines which use US customary units (such as the US aerospace industry).

Everett (1861) proposed the metric dyne and erg as the units of force and energy in the FPS system.

Latimer Clark's (1891) "Dictionary of Measures" contains celo (acceleration), vel or velo (velocity) and pulse (momentum) as proposed names for FPS absolute units.

Pound-force as force unit

The technical or gravitational FPS system,[5] is a coherent variant of the FPS system that is most common among engineers in the United States. It takes the pound-force as a fundamental unit of force instead of the pound as a fundamental unit of mass.

In this sub-system, the unit of mass is a derived unit known as the slug.[1]

1\,\text{slug} = 1\,\text{lb}_F \cdot 1\,\frac{\text{s}^2}{\text{ft}}

In the context of the gravitational FPS system, the pound-force (lbF) is almost universally simply referred to as the pound (lb).

Pound as force unit

Another variant of the FPS system uses both the pound-mass and the pound-force, but neither the slug nor the poundal. The resulting system is not coherent, lacking electrical or molar units, and is sometimes also known as the British engineering system, although rarely used nowadays in the United Kingdom.[5]

Other units

Molar units

The unit of substance in the FPS system is the pound-mole (lb-mol) = 273.16×1024. Until the SI decided to adopt the gram-mole, the mole was directly derived from the mass unit as (mass unit)/(atomic mass unit). The unit (lbF·s²/ft)-mol also appears in a former definition of the atmosphere.

Electromagnetic units

The Electrostatic and Electromagnetic systems are derived from units of length and force, mainly. As such, these are ready extensions of any system of containing length, mass, time. Stephen Dresner[6] gives the derived electrostatic and electromagnetic units in both the foot–pound–second and foot–slug–second systems. In practice, these are most associated with the centimetre–gram–second system. The 1929 "International Critical Tables" gives in the symbols and systems fpse = FPS electrostatic system and fpsm = FPS electromagnetic system. Under the conversions for charge, the following are given. The CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics 1979 (Edition 60), also lists fpse and fpsm as standard abbreviations.

Electromagnetic FPS (EMU, stat-)
1 fpsm unit = 117.581866 cgsm unit (Biot-second)
Electrostatic FPS (ESU, ab-)
1 fpse unit = 3583.8953 cgse unit (Franklin)
1 fpse unit = 1.1954588×10−6 abs coulomb

Units of light

The candle and the foot-candle were the first defined units of light, defined in the Metropolitan Gas Act (1860).[7] The foot-candle is the intensity of light at one foot from a standard candle. The units were internationally recognised in 1881, and adopted into the metric system.[8]


Together with the fact that the term "weight" is used for the gravitational force in some technical contexts (physics, engineering) and for mass in others (commerce, law),[9] and that the distinction often does not matter in practice, the coexistence of variants of the FPS system causes confusion over the nature of the unit "pound". Its relation to international, metric units is expressed in kilograms, not newtons, though, and in earlier times it was defined by means of a mass prototype to be compared with a two-pan balance which is agnostic of local gravitational differences.

In July 1959, the various national foot and avoirdupois pound standards were replaced by the international foot of precisely 0.3048 m and the international pound of precisely 0.45359237 kg, making conversion between the systems a matter of simple mathematics. The conversion for the poundal is given by 1 pdl = 1 lb·ft/s2 = 0.138254954376 N (precisely).[1]

To convert between the absolute and gravitational FPS systems one needs to fix the standard acceleration g which connects the pound and the pound-force.

1\,\text{lb}_F = 1\,\text{lb}_m\cdot g

While g strictly depends on one's location on the Earth surface, since 1901 in most contexts it is fixed conventionally at precisely g09.80665 m/s2 ≈ 32.17405 ft/s2.[1] Therefore the slug is about 32.17405 lbm or 14.593903 kg.

See also


  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 Cardarelli, François (2003), "The Foot–Pound–Second (FPS) System", Encyclopaedia of Scientific Units, Weights and Measures: Their SI Equivalences and Origins, Springer, pp. 51–55, ISBN 978-1-85233-682-0<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>.
  2. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value)..
  3. Michael R. Lindeburg (2011). Civil Engineering Reference Manual for the Pe Exam. Professional Publications. ISBN 1591263417.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  4. Wurbs, Ralph A, Fort Hood Review Sessions for Professional Engineering Exam (PDF), retrieved October 26, 2011<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  5. 5.0 5.1 J. M. Coulson, J. F. Richardson, J. R. Backhurst, J. H. Harker: Coulson & Richardson's Chemical Engineering: Fluid flow, heat transfer, and mass transfer.
  6. Dresner, Stephen (1971). Units of Measurement. New York: Hastings House. pp. 193–205.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  7. Jerrard, H G (1985). A Dictionary of Scientific Units. London: Chapman and Hall. p. 24. ISBN 0412281007.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  8. Fenna, Donald (2003), Dictionary of weights and measures, ISBN 978-0-19-860522-5<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  9. NIST Federal Standard 376B[dead link], p. 13.