This is a good article. Click here for more information.

Forward exchange rate

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search
Not to be confused with forward rate or forward price.

The forward exchange rate (also referred to as forward rate or forward price) is the exchange rate at which a bank agrees to exchange one currency for another at a future date when it enters into a forward contract with an investor.[1][2][3] Multinational corporations, banks, and other financial institutions enter into forward contracts to take advantage of the forward rate for hedging purposes.[1] The forward exchange rate is determined by a parity relationship among the spot exchange rate and differences in interest rates between two countries, which reflects an economic equilibrium in the foreign exchange market under which arbitrage opportunities are eliminated. When in equilibrium, and when interest rates vary across two countries, the parity condition implies that the forward rate includes a premium or discount reflecting the interest rate differential. Forward exchange rates have important theoretical implications for forecasting future spot exchange rates. Financial economists have put forth a hypothesis that the forward rate accurately predicts the future spot rate, for which empirical evidence is mixed.


The forward exchange rate is the rate at which a commercial bank is willing to commit to exchange one currency for another at some specified future date.[1] The forward exchange rate is a type of forward price. It is the exchange rate negotiated today between a bank and a client upon entering into a forward contract agreeing to buy or sell some amount of foreign currency in the future.[2][3] Multinational corporations and financial institutions often use the forward market to hedge future payables or receivables denominated in a foreign currency against foreign exchange risk by using a forward contract to lock in a forward exchange rate. Hedging with forward contracts is typically used for larger transactions, while futures contracts are used for smaller transactions. This is due to the customization afforded to banks by forward contracts traded over-the-counter, versus the standardization of futures contracts which are traded on an exchange.[1] Banks typically quote forward rates for major currencies in maturities of one, three, six, nine, or twelve months, however in some cases quotations for greater maturities are available up to five or ten years.[2]

Relation to covered interest rate parity

Covered interest rate parity is a no-arbitrage condition in foreign exchange markets which depends on the availability of the forward market. It can be rearranged to give the forward exchange rate as a function of the other variables. The forward exchange rate depends on three known variables: the spot exchange rate, the domestic interest rate, and the foreign interest rate. This effectively means that the forward rate is the price of a forward contract, which derives its value from the pricing of spot contracts and the addition of information on available interest rates.[4]

The following equation represents covered interest rate parity, a condition under which investors eliminate exposure to foreign exchange risk (unanticipated changes in exchange rates) with the use of a forward contract – the exchange rate risk is effectively covered. Under this condition, a domestic investor would earn equal returns from investing in domestic assets or converting currency at the spot exchange rate, investing in foreign currency assets in a country with a different interest rate, and exchanging the foreign currency for domestic currency at the negotiated forward exchange rate. Investors will be indifferent to the interest rates on deposits in these countries due to the equilibrium resulting from the forward exchange rate. The condition allows for no arbitrage opportunities because the return on domestic deposits, 1+id, is equal to the return on foreign deposits, [S/F](1+if). If these two returns weren't equalized by the use of a forward contract, there would be a potential arbitrage opportunity in which, for example, an investor could borrow currency in the country with the lower interest rate, convert to the foreign currency at today's spot exchange rate, and invest in the foreign country with the higher interest rate.[4]

(1+i_d) = \frac {S} F (1+i_f)


F is the forward exchange rate
S is the current spot exchange rate
id is the interest rate in domestic currency (base currency)
if is the interest rate in foreign currency (quoted currency)

This equation can be arranged such that it solves for the forward rate:

F = S \frac {(1+i_f)} {(1+i_d)}

Forward premium or discount

The equilibrium that results from the relationship between forward and spot exchange rates within the context of covered interest rate parity is responsible for eliminating or correcting for market inefficiencies that would create potential for arbitrage profits. As such, arbitrage opportunities are fleeting. In order for this equilibrium to hold under differences in interest rates between two countries, the forward exchange rate must generally differ from the spot exchange rate, such that a no-arbitrage condition is sustained. Therefore, the forward rate is said to contain a premium or discount, reflecting the interest rate differential between two countries. The following equations demonstrate how the forward premium or discount is calculated.[1][2]

The forward exchange rate differs by a premium or discount of the spot exchange rate:

F = S(1 + P)


P is the premium (if positive) or discount (if negative)

The equation can be rearranged as follows to solve for the forward premium/discount:

P = \frac {F} S - 1

In practice, forward premiums and discounts are quoted as annualized percentage deviations from the spot exchange rate, in which case it is necessary to account for the number of days to delivery as in the following example.[2]

P_N = (\frac {F} S - 1) \frac {360} d


N represents the maturity of a given forward exchange rate quote
d represents the number of days to delivery

For example, to calculate the 6-month forward premium or discount for the euro versus the dollar deliverable in 30 days, given a spot rate quote of 1.2238 $/€ and a 6-month forward rate quote of 1.2260 $/€:

P_6 = (\frac {1.2260} {1.2238} - 1) \frac {360} {30} = 0.021572 = 2.16\%

The resulting 0.021572 is positive, so one would say that the euro is trading at a 0.021572 or 2.16% premium against the dollar for delivery in 30 days. Conversely, if one were to work this example in euro terms rather than dollar terms, the perspective would be reversed and one would say that the dollar is trading at a discount against the Euro.

Forecasting future spot exchange rates

Unbiasedness hypothesis

The unbiasedness hypothesis states that given conditions of rational expectations and risk neutrality, the forward exchange rate is an unbiased predictor of the future spot exchange rate. Without introducing a foreign exchange risk premium (due to the assumption of risk neutrality), the following equation illustrates the unbiasedness hypothesis.[3][5][6][7]

F_t = E_t(S_{t + k})


F_t is the forward exchange rate at time t
E_t(S_{t + k}) is the expected future spot exchange rate at time t + k
k is the number of periods into the future from time t

The empirical rejection of the unbiasedness hypothesis is a well-recognized puzzle among finance researchers. Empirical evidence for cointegration between the forward rate and the future spot rate is mixed.[5][8][9] Researchers have published papers demonstrating empirical failure of the hypothesis by conducting regression analyses of the realized changes in spot exchange rates on forward premiums and finding negative slope coefficients.[10] These researchers offer numerous rationales for such failure. One rationale centers around the relaxation of risk neutrality, while still assuming rational expectations, such that a foreign exchange risk premium may exist that can account for differences between the forward rate and the future spot rate.[11]

The following equation represents the forward rate as being equal to a future spot rate and a risk premium (not to be confused with a forward premium):[12]

F_t = E_t(S_{t + 1}) + P_t

The current spot rate can be introduced so that the equation solves for the forward-spot differential (the difference between the forward rate and the current spot rate):

F_t - S_t = E_t(S_{t + 1} - S_t) + P_t

Eugene Fama concluded that large positive correlations of the difference between the forward exchange rate and the current spot exchange rate signal variations over time in the premium component of the forward-spot differential F_t - S_t or in the forecast of the expected change in the spot exchange rate. Fama suggested that slope coefficients in the regressions of the difference between the forward rate and the future spot rate F_t - S_{t + 1}, and the expected change in the spot rate E_t(S_{t + 1} - S_t), on the forward-spot differential F_t - S_t which are different from zero imply variations over time in both components of the forward-spot differential: the premium and the expected change in the spot rate.[12] Fama's findings were sought to be empirically validated by a significant body of research, ultimately finding that large variance in expected changes in the spot rate could only be accounted for by risk aversion coefficients that were deemed "unacceptably high."[7][11] Other researchers have found that the unbiasedness hypothesis has been rejected in both cases where there is evidence of risk premia varying over time and cases where risk premia are constant.[13]

Other rationales for the failure of the forward rate unbiasedness hypothesis include considering the conditional bias to be an exogenous variable explained by a policy aimed at smoothing interest rates and stabilizing exchange rates, or considering that an economy allowing for discrete changes could facilitate excess returns in the forward market. Some researchers have contested empirical failures of the hypothesis and have sought to explain conflicting evidence as resulting from contaminated data and even inappropriate selections of the time length of forward contracts.[11] Economists demonstrated that the forward rate could serve as a useful proxy for future spot exchange rates between currencies with liquidity premia that average out to zero during the onset of floating exchange rate regimes in the 1970s.[14] Research examining the introduction of endogenous breaks to test the structural stability of cointegrated spot and forward exchange rate time series have found some evidence to support forward rate unbiasedness in both the short and long term.[9]

See also


  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 Madura, Jeff (2007). International Financial Management: Abridged 8th Edition. Mason, OH: Thomson South-Western. ISBN 0-324-36563-2. 
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 Eun, Cheol S.; Resnick, Bruce G. (2011). International Financial Management, 6th Edition. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin. ISBN 978-0-07-803465-7. 
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 Levi, Maurice D. (2005). International Finance, 4th Edition. New York, NY: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-30900-4. 
  4. 4.0 4.1 Feenstra, Robert C.; Taylor, Alan M. (2008). International Macroeconomics. New York, NY: Worth Publishers. ISBN 978-1-4292-0691-4. 
  5. 5.0 5.1 Delcoure, Natalya; Barkoulas, John; Baum, Christopher F.; Chakraborty, Atreya (2003). "The Forward Rate Unbiasedness Hypothesis Reexamined: Evidence from a New Test". Global Finance Journal. 14 (1): 83–93. doi:10.1016/S1044-0283(03)00006-1. Retrieved 2011-06-21. 
  6. Ho, Tsung-Wu (2003). "A re-examination of the unbiasedness forward rate hypothesis using dynamic SUR model". The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance. 43 (3): 542–559. doi:10.1016/S1062-9769(02)00171-0. Retrieved 2011-06-23. 
  7. 7.0 7.1 Sosvilla-Rivero, Simón; Park, Young B. (1992). "Further tests on the forward exchange rate unbiasedness hypothesis". Economics Letters. 40 (3): 325–331. doi:10.1016/0165-1765(92)90013-O. Retrieved 2011-06-27. 
  8. Moffett, Michael H.; Stonehill, Arthur I.; Eiteman, David K. (2009). Fundamentals of Multinational Finance, 3rd Edition. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-54164-2. 
  9. 9.0 9.1 Villanueva, O. Miguel (2007). "Spot-forward cointegration, structural breaks and FX market unbiasedness". International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money. 17 (1): 58–78. doi:10.1016/j.intfin.2005.08.007. Retrieved 2011-06-22. 
  10. Zivot, Eric (2000). "Cointegration and forward and spot exchange rate regressions". Journal of International Money and Finance. 19 (6): 785–812. doi:10.1016/S0261-5606(00)00031-0. Retrieved 2011-06-22. 
  11. 11.0 11.1 11.2 Diamandis, Panayiotis F.; Georgoutsos, Dimitris A.; Kouretas, Georgios P. (2008). "Testing the forward rate unbiasedness hypothesis during the 1920s". International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money. 18 (4): 358–373. doi:10.1016/j.intfin.2007.04.003. Retrieved 2011-06-23. 
  12. 12.0 12.1 Fama, Eugene F. (1984). "Forward and spot exchange rates". Journal of Monetary Economics. 14 (3): 319–338. doi:10.1016/0304-3932(84)90046-1. Retrieved 2011-06-20. 
  13. Chatterjee, Devalina (2010). Three essays in forward rate unbiasedness hypothesis (Thesis). Utah State University. pp. 1–102. Retrieved 2012-06-21. 
  14. Cornell, Bradford (1977). "Spot rates, forward rates and exchange market efficiency". Journal of Financial Economics. 5 (1): 55–65. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(77)90029-0. Retrieved 2011-06-28.