General American

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search

General American (abbreviated as GA or GenAm) is an umbrella variety of American English—a continuum of accents[1]—commonly attributed to a majority of Americans and popularly perceived, among Americans, as lacking any notably regional, ethnic, or socioeconomic characteristics.[2][3][4] Due to the prevalence of a General American sound system throughout the United States, General American is sometimes, though controversially,[5] known as Standard American English.[6][7][8]

Standard Canadian English closely aligns to General American speech,[8] especially rather than England's Received Pronunciation in every situation where General American and Received Pronunciation differ.[9] The precise definition and usefulness of "General American" continues to be debated,[10][11][12] and the scholars who use it today admittedly do so as a convenient basis for comparison rather than for exactness.[10][13]

History, definition, and dialectology

The term "General American" was first disseminated by American English scholar George Philip Krapp, who, in 1925, described it as "Western" but "not local in character."[14] In 1930, American linguist John Samuel Kenyon, who largely popularized the term, considered it equivalent to the speech of "the North," or "Northern American,"[14] but, in 1934, "Western and Midwestern."[15]

By the 1940s, a common definition for General American was any American English accent that excluded the regionally distinct sounds of the American South, Eastern New England, and New York City;[16] by the 1960s, this further came to exclude the regional sounds of the Mid-Atlantic region and Western Pennsylvania.[17] By the 2000s, American sociolinguist William Labov concluded that, if any sound system could be recognized as "General American," it would essentially be a convergence of those features shared among Western American English, Midland American English, and Standard Canadian English.[18]

Now typically regarded as falling under the General American umbrella are the dialects of the American West,[18][19] Western New England,[20] and perhaps much of the American Midland and Canada.[8][21] Once in the earlier 20th century but no longer now included are the dialects of the Mid-Atlantic United States,[17] the Inland North,[1] and Western Pennsylvania.[22] Dialects that have never been included are those of Eastern New England, New York City, and the American South.[23]

Anglicist William A. Kretzchmar, Jr. explains in a 2004 article that

The term "General American" arose as a name for a presumed most common or "default" form of American English, especially to be distinguished from marked regional speech of New England or the South. "General American" has often been considered to be the relatively unmarked speech of "the Midwest", a vague designation for anywhere in the vast midsection of the country from Ohio west to Nebraska, and from the Canadian border as far south as Missouri or Kansas. No historical justification for this term exists, and neither do present circumstances support its use... [I]t implies that there is some exemplary state of American English from which other varieties deviate. On the contrary, [it] can best be characterized as what is left over after speakers suppress the regional and social features that have risen to salience and become noticeable.[12]

Due to the prestige and prescription potentially associated with a "General" variety of American speech, Kretzchmar prefers the term Standard American English, claiming it describes a level of pronunciation "employed by educated speakers in formal settings," while still being variable within the U.S. from place to place, and even from speaker to speaker.[7] However, this term is also problematic, since "Standard English may be taken to reflect conformance to a set of rules, but its meaning commonly gets bound up with social ideas about how one's character and education are displayed in one's speech."[7] The term Standard North American English, in an effort to incorporate Canadian speakers under the continuum, has also been very recently suggested by sociolinguist Charles Boberg.[8]

Geographical origins

Despite the common perception of there being a mainstream American accent that is free of any regional features or regional influence, the General American sound system does, in fact, have traceable regional origins: namely, the Northern speech patterns of the non-coastal Eastern United States,[24] including interior Pennsylvania, upstate New York, and the adjacent Midwestern region, prior to the Northern Cities Vowel Shift of the mid-20th century.[1][25]

The fact that a rural, broadly Midwestern dialect became the basis of what is General American English is often attributed to the mass migration of Midwestern farmers to California and the Pacific Northwest from where it spread,[citation needed] since California speech itself became prevalent in nationally syndicated films and media via the Hollywood film industry.

However, the English of the Midwest's Great Lakes region (as well as the region to its immediate west), since at least the middle of the 20th century, has begun deviating noticeably away from General American sounds, especially since that era's regionally unique Northern Cities Vowel Shift (NCVS). The regionality of one's accent often gets more distinct the farther north one goes within the Midwest, and the Midwest is even home now to at least two major dialects that definitively use pronunciations divergent from "General American": the Inland North dialect (often associated with the Great Lakes urban centers, including Chicago) and the North Central dialect (often associated with Minnesota, Wisconsin, and the Dakotas). The notion that Midwesterners generally speak a "more correct and more pleasant" or otherwise "accentless variety" of American English is a matter of perception and stereotype rather than truth.[26]

Particularly important in setting standards was John Kenyon, the pronunciation editor of the second edition of Webster's New International Dictionary, who is claimed to have based his dictionary's pronunciation standard on his native Midwestern (specifically, Ohio) pronunciation.[27]

General American in the media

General American, like British Received Pronunciation (RP) and the prestige accents of many other societies, has never been the accent of the entire nation.

A General American pronunciation is most directly descended from a generalized pronunciation of the early 1900s from the inland Northeastern and Midwestern states, which likely gained ground nationally by being spoken particularly by many newscasters and radio and television announcers; this has led the accent to being sometimes referred to as an American newscaster accent, "Network English" or "Network Standard."[1][3] General American is sometimes promoted as preferable to other regional accents and prestigious.[28][29] In the United States, classes promising "accent reduction", "accent modification," or "accent neutralization" generally attempt to teach speech patterns similar to this accent. A common experience among many American celebrities is having worked hard to lose their native accents in favor a more mainstream General American sound, including television journalist Linda Ellerbee (originally, a speaker of Texan English), who stated that "in television you are not supposed to sound like you're from anywhere,"[30] as well as political comedian Stephen Colbert, who completely reduced his South Carolina accent as a child because of the common portrayal of Southerners as stupid on American television.[28][29]



A table containing the consonant phonemes is given below:

Consonant phonemes
Labial Dental Alveolar Post-
Palatal Velar Glottal
Nasal m n ŋ
Stop p b t d k ɡ
Fricative f v θ ð s z ʃ ʒ h
Approximant l ɹ j (ʍ) w
  • Wine–whine merger (/hw/[w]): The breathy "wh" sound is largely merged to a voiced "w" sound [w], so that, for instance, whale and wail sound exactly alike in most General American accents. The phoneme [ʍ] is retained only in American English varieties that have not undergone the merger, with /ʍ/ often analyzed as a consonant cluster of /hw/.
  • Rhoticity (or "r"-fulness): General American accents are firmly rhotic, pronouncing the "r" sound in all environments, including after vowels, such as in pearl, car, and court.[31][32] Americans realize the phoneme [ɹ] (often transcribed as /r/) as postalveolar, like in most English varieties, though with some possible retroflexion (perhaps, even as [ɻ]).[33] Non-rhotic American accents, such as Eastern New England, New York, or African American vernacular accents, are often quickly noticed by General American listeners and perceived to sound especially ethnic, regional, or "old-fashioned" (i.e. local and non-mainstream).[34][35][36]
  • "T"-glottalization and "flapping": /t/ undergoes t-glottalization, producing a glottal stop [ʔ], before a consonant (particularly a syllabic nasal) or in word-final position, for example, in words like button [ˈbʌʔn], mountain [ˈmæʊnʔn̩], atmosphere [ˈæʔməsfɪɚ], grateful [ˈgɹeɪʔfɫ̩], and cot [kʰäʔ]. The word-final /t/ rule, however, may be superseded by General American's intervocalic alveolar flapping, wherein intervocalic /t/ as well as intervocalic /d/ become [ɾ] when between a stressed syllable and an unstressed one, or between two unstressed syllables; for example, leader [ˈɫiɾɚ] (About this sound listen), catalogue/catalog [ˈkʰæɾəɫɑg] (About this sound listen), or ratty [ˈɹæɾi] (About this sound listen). Typically, /t/ and /d/ also between /r/ and a vowel become realized as the flap consonant [ɾ]; thus: party [ˈpʰɑɹɾi] (About this sound listen).
  • Yod-dropping: After consonants formed with the tongue touching the ridge on the roof of the mouth (alveolar consonants), the historical sound /j/ is most commonly "dropped" or "deleted," so that, for example, new /njuː/ becomes [nu̟ː], duke /djuːk/ becomes [du̟ːk], and tube /tjuːb/ becomes [tʰu̟ːb].[37]
  • "L"-velarization: England's typical English distinction between a "clear L" (i.e. [l]) and a "dark L" (i.e. [ɫ] or even [ʟ]) is much less obvious in General American; it may even be altogether absent.[38] Instead, General American speakers pronounce even the "clear" variant as more or less "dark", meaning that all "L" sounds have some degree of velarization.[39] Additionally, some speakers may vocalize /l/ to [ɤ̯] when it appears before /f v/ (and sometimes also /s z/).[40]


Monophthongs of typical Midwestern English, approximating GA. From Mannell, Cox & Harrington (2009a). The symbol "ɔ" here refers to r-colored /ɔ/ (/ɔr/), found in such words as warm.
Ranges for GA and RP weak vowels. From Wells (2008, p. XXV)
Diphthongs of typical Midwestern English, from Mannell, Cox & Harrington (2009b).
• When monophthongized, // and // tend to be closer to cardinal [e] and [o], respectively.
• For many speakers, the first element of // is more front than what appears on this chart.

The 2006 Atlas of North American English surmises that "if one were to recognize a type of North American English to be called 'General American'" according to data measurements of vowel pronunciations, "it would be the configuration formed by these three" dialect regions: Canada, the American West, and the American Midland.[18] The following charts present the vowels that these three dialects encompass as a perceived General American sound system.

Pure vowels

Pure vowels (Monophthongs)
English diaphoneme General American phoneme Example words
/æ/ [æ] About this sound listen bath, trap, yak
[æ~ɛə~eə][41][42] ham, man, yeah
/ɑː/ [ɑ~ä] About this sound listen ah, father, spa
/ɒ/ bother, lot, wasp
[ɒ(ː)~ɑ(ː)] About this sound listen boss, dog, off
/ɔː/ all, bought, flaunt
/ɛ/ [ɛ] About this sound listen dress, met, bread
/ə/ [ə] About this sound listen about, syrup, arena
/ɪ/ [ɪ] About this sound listen hit, skim, tip
/iː/ [i(ː)] About this sound listen beam, chic, flee
/i/ [i] About this sound listen happy, money, parties
/ɨ/ [ɪ̈~ɪ~ə] About this sound listen private, muffin, wasted
/ʌ/ [ʌ~ɐ] About this sound listen bus, flood, what
/ʊ/ [ʊ] About this sound listen book, put, should
/uː/ [u̟ː~ʊu~ʉu~ɵu][43][44] About this sound listen goose, new, true
  • Father–bother merger (/ɒ/[ɑ]): Nearly all American accents merge the vowel sounds of words like spa and ah with the vowel sounds of words like spot and odd; therefore, con and Kahn are homophones in General American.
  • Cot–caught merger in transition: There is no single "General American" way to pronounce the vowels in words like cot /ɑ/ (the "broad a" vowel) versus caught /ɔ/ (the "aw" vowel), largely due to a merger occurring between the two sounds in some parts of North America, but not others. American speakers with a completed merger pronounce the two historically separate vowels with the exact same sound (especially in the West, northern New England, West Virginia, western Pennsylvania, and the Upper Midwest) , but other speakers have no trace of a merger at all (especially in the South, the Great Lakes region, southern New England, and the Mid-Atlantic and New York metropolitan areas) and so pronounce each vowel with distinct sounds About this sound (listen).[49] Among speakers who distinguish between the two, the vowel of cot (usually transcribed in American English as [ɑ]), may be more of a central [ä] (About this sound listen) or advanced back vowel [ɑ̟], while /ɔ/ is phonetically higher in the mouth and/or more rounded, closer to [ɒ], but with only slight rounding.[50] Among speakers who do not distinguish between the two and are thus said to have undergone the cot–caught merger, /ɑ/ usually remains a back vowel, [ɑ], sometimes showing lip rounding as [ɒ] (also transcribed [ɑʷ] in non-standard IPA). Therefore, General American speakers vary greatly with this speech feature, with possibilities ranging from a full merger to a full absence of a merger. In the middle of this range, a transitional stage of the merger is also common in random scatterings throughout the U.S., though especially among younger speakers and most consistently in the "Midland" region lying between the historical North and South. According to a 2003 dialect survey carried out across the United States, about 61% of participants perceive themselves as keeping the two vowels distinct and 39% do not.[51]
  • Vowel mergers before "r" (before a vowel): General American participates in some mergers of vowel sounds only when such a vowel occurs before an /r/ sound that is itself followed by another vowel (known as "intervocalic r").
    • Mary–marry–merry merger in transition: According to a 2003 dialect survey of the United States, nearly 57% of participants from around the country merged the sounds /ær/ (as in the first syllable of parish), /ɛr/ (as in the first syllable of perish), and /ɛər/ (as in pear or pair);[52] the merged sound ranges between [ɛɚ] and [ɛ(ː)ɹ]. The merger is in transition, already complete everywhere except along some areas of the Atlantic Coast.[53]
    • Hurry–furry merger: The pre-"r" vowels in words like hurry /ʌ/ and furry /ə/ are merged in most General American accents to [ə~ɚ]. Only 10% of English speakers across the U.S. maintain the historic hurry vowel before /r/, according to a 2003 dialect survey.[54]
    • Mirror–nearer merger in transition: The pre-"r" vowels in words like mirror /ɪ/ and nearer // are merged in some General American accents, usually to [i(ː)]. The quality of the historic mirror vowel is even more drastically variable in the word miracle.[55]
  • Unstressed pure vowels:
    • Weak-vowel merger: [ə] and [ɪ̈] (also transcribed as [ɨ̞] and [ᵻ] (the latter is a non-IPA symbol) (About this sound listen)) are indeterminate vowel sounds that occur only in unstressed syllables of certain types. [ə] is heard, for example, as the "a" at the beginning of about and at the end of China, as the "o" in omit, and as the "u" in syrup. [ɪ̈] is heard as the "a" in private or cottage, the "e" in evading or sorted, the "i" in sordid, the "u" in minute, or the "y" in mythologist. However, [ə] and [ɪ̈] can frequently overlap and easily merge in American accents, especially towards the schwa [ə].
    • Phonetically, the schwa /ə/ (as in COMMA) ranges from close-mid [ɘ] to open-mid [ɜ].[56]
    • In environments in which the tense—lax contrast between the close vowels is neutralized, the phonetic realization of these vowels varies in height between close and close-mid:
      • /iː~ɪ/ (as in HAPPY; usually transcribed /i/ even though it is not a phoneme) ranges from close front [i] to close-mid retracted front [];[56]
      • /uː~ʊ/ (as in INFLUENCE; usually transcribed /u/ even though it is not a phoneme) ranges from close advanced back [] to close-mid retracted central [ɵ̠].[56]
  • Fronting of "short u" (/ʌ/[ʌ̈~ɐ]): The vowel /ʌ/ (of strut, luck, rough, what, etc.), is generally near-open and fronted, approaching [ʌ̈~ɐ]; however, it always remains a back vowel before /l/, and often even merges with /əl/, so that /ʌl/, as in null or skull, becomes [ʌɫ] or [ɫ̩].
  • Fronting of "long oo" (//[u̟]): The vowel /u/ (as in lose, loose, or loot) has a unique quality in the United States (About this sound listen); it tends to be less rounded [u̜] and more fronted [u̟], and perhaps even diphthongized with a somewhat fronter and lower onset; this can be transcribed in a variety of ways.

Gliding vowels

Gliding vowels (Diphthongs)
English diaphoneme General American phoneme Example words
/aɪ/ [äɪ] About this sound listen bride, prize, tie
[äɪ~ɐɪ~ʌɪ] bright, price, tyke
/aʊ/ [aʊ~æʊ] About this sound listen now, ouch, scout
/eɪ/ [eɪ~ɛ̝ɪ] About this sound listen lake, paid, rein
/ɔɪ/ [ɔɪ~o̞ɪ] About this sound listen boy, choice, moist
/oʊ/ [oʊ~ɔʊ~ʌʊ~ɜʊ][44][57][58] About this sound listen goat, home, toe
[o̞ʊ~o̞(ː)] About this sound listen goal, holy, toll
  • Raising of the start of the "long i" sound before voiceless consonants: The // vowel, as in pine or pie—pronounced [äɪ] (About this sound listen) in North America—has a starting sound (an "on-glide") in which the tongue is raised towards [ɐɪ] or [ʌɪ] whenever it appears before a voiceless consonant (such as /k/, /s/, /t/, or /θ/, for instance, in pike or python). This phenomenon is growing in American English, first predominant historically in the Northern, New England, and Mid-Atlantic regions of the country.[59] In a General American accent, this alone causes a distinction, for example, between the words rider and writer (About this sound listen). Although now present with most U.S. speakers, this phenomenon is considered one of the two variants of so-called "Canadian raising." This raising can also apply across word boundaries, though the position of a word or phrase's stress may deny the raising from taking place. For instance, a high school in the sense of "secondary school" is generally pronounced [ˈhɐɪsku̟ɫ]; however, a high school in the literal sense of "a tall school" is pronounced [ˌhäɪˈsku̟ɫ].

R-colored vowels

R-colored vowels
English diaphoneme General American phoneme Example words
/ɑr/ [ɑɚ~ɑɹ] About this sound listen barn, car, park
/ɛər/ [ɛɚ] About this sound listen bare, bear, there
/ɜr/ [ɚ] About this sound listen burn, doctor, first,
herd, learn, murder
/ɪər/ [iɚ~ɪɚ] About this sound listen fear, peer, tier
/ɔr/ [o̞ɹ~ɔɚ] About this sound listen horse, storm, war
/ɔər/ hoarse, store, wore
/ʊər/ [ʊɚ~o̞ɹ~ɔɚ] moor, poor, tour
/jʊər/ [jʊɚ~jɚ] About this sound listen cure, Europe, pure
  • Horse–hoarse merger (/ɔːr/ + /ɔər/[o̞ɹ]): As in most modern varieties of English around the world, words like war and wore are pronounced the same in General American English. Words with these r-colored vowels, such as north and horse, are usually transcribed /nɔɹθ/ and /hɔɹs/, but may be closer in General American English to [no̞ɹθ] and [ho̞ɹs].[60] Thus, in these cases, the [ɔ] before /ɹ/ can be analyzed as an allophone of /o/.
  • "Short o" before "r" (before a vowel): In typical North American accents (U.S. and Canada alike), the phoneme /ɒr/ (a short "o" sound followed by "r" and then another vowel, as in orange, forest, moral, and warrant) is realized as [oɹ~ɔɹ], thus further merging with the already-merged /ɔr/–/ɔər/ (horse–hoarse) sets. In the U.S. in particular, however, four words alone are exceptions (tomorrow, sorry, sorrow, borrow and, for some speakers, morrow), which more commonly use the sound [ɑɹ], uniquely merging with the /ɑːr/ set (thus, sorry and sari become homophones, both rhyming with starry).[50]
  • In General American English, both /ɜːr/ (or [ɝ]) and /ər/ (or [ɚ]) are actually pronounced, without much or any distinction, as [ɚ] (About this sound listen); for example, the word worker /ˈwɜrkər/ is often realized with two rhyming syllables as [ˈwɚkɚ] (About this sound listen).

See also


  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Wells (1982b:470)
  2. Van Riper (2014:123)
  3. 3.0 3.1 Kövecses, Zoltán (2000). American English. An Introduction. Peterborough, Canada: Broadview Press. pp. 81-2.
  4. Wells (1982a:34)
  5. Van Riper (2014:125–6)
  6. Wells (1982a:34)
  7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 Kortmann (2004:257)
  8. 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 Boberg, Charles (2004). "Standard Canadian English." In Raymond Hickey. Standards of English: Codified Varieties Around the World. Cambridge University Press. p. 159.
  9. Wells (1982b:491)
  10. 10.0 10.1 Wells (1982a:118)
  11. Van Riper (2014:124, 126)
  12. 12.0 12.1 Kortmann (2004:262)
  13. Labov, Ash & Boberg (2006:263)
  14. 14.0 14.1 Van Riper (2014:124)
  15. Van Riper (2014:125)
  16. Van Riper (2014:129)
  17. 17.0 17.1 Van Riper (2014:128–9)
  18. 18.0 18.1 18.2 Labov, Ash & Boberg (2006:146)
  19. Van Riper (2014:130)
  20. Van Riper (2014:128, 130)
  21. Van Riper (2014:129–130)
  22. Van Riper (2014:128)
  23. Van Riper (2014:123, 129)
  24. Labov, Ash & Boberg (2006:190)
  25. "Talking the Tawk". The New Yorker. Condé Nast. 2005.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  26. "Do You Speak American? American Varieties: The Midwest Accent". PBS. Retrieved 2012-09-06.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  27. Seabrook (2005)
  28. 28.0 28.1 Gross, Terry (January 24, 2005), "A Fake Newsman's Fake Newsman: Stephen Colbert", Fresh Air, National Public Radio, retrieved 2007-07-11<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  29. 29.0 29.1 Safer, Morley (August 13, 2006), The Colbert Report: Morley Safer Profiles Comedy Central's 'Fake' Newsman, 60 Minutes, retrieved 2006-08-15<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  30. You Know What The Midwest Is?<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  31. Plag, Ingo; Braun, Maria; Lappe, Sabine; Schramm, Mareile (2009). Introduction to English Linguistics. Walter de Gruyter. p. 53. ISBN 978-3-11-021550-2. Retrieved 4 July 2013.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  32. Collins, Beverley; Mees, Inger M. (2002). The Phonetics of Dutch and English (PDF) (5 ed.). Leiden/Boston: Brill Publishers. p. 178.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  33. Hallé, Best & Levitt (1999:283) citing Delattre & Freeman (1968), Zawadzki & Kuehn (1980), and Boyce & Espy-Wilson (1997)
  34. Plag, Ingo; Braun, Maria; Lappe, Sabine; Schramm, Mareile (2009). Introduction to English Linguistics. Walter de Gruyter. p. 53. ISBN 978-3-11-021550-2. Retrieved 4 July 2013.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  35. Collins, Beverley; Mees, Inger M. (2002). The Phonetics of Dutch and English (PDF) (5 ed.). Leiden/Boston: Brill Publishers. pp. 181, 306.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  36. Wolchover, Natalie (2012). "Why Do Americans and Brits Have Different Accents?" LiveScience. Purch.
  37. Wells (1982a:247)
  38. Grzegorz Dogil, Susanne Maria Reiterer, and Walter de Gruyter, eds. (2009). "general+american"+"velarized" Language Talent and Brain Activity: Trends in Applied Linguistics. Walter de Gruyter GmbH. p. 299. line feed character in |editors= at position 44 (help)CS1 maint: uses editors parameter (link)<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  39. Jones, Roach & Hartman (2006:xi)
  40. Rogers (2000:120–121)
  41. Labov et al. (2006:180)
  42. Kortmann (2004:315, 340)
  43. Kortmann & Boberg (2004:154, 343, 361)
  44. 44.0 44.1 Heggarty, Paul et al., eds. (2013). "Accents of English from Around the World". University of Edinburgh. Explicit use of et al. in: |editors= (help)CS1 maint: uses editors parameter (link)<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  45. Boberg, Charles (Spring 2001). "Phonological Status of Western New England." American Speech, Volume 76, Number 1. pp. 3-29 (Article). Duke University Press. p. 11: "The vowel /æ/ is generally tensed and raised [...] only before nasals, a raising environment for most speakers of North American English."
  46. Labov et al. (2006), p. 182.
  47. Boberg, Charles; Strassel, Stephanie M. (2000). "in Cincinnati: A change in progress". Journal of English Linguistics. 28: 108–126. doi:10.1177/00754240022004929.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  48. Trager, George L. (1940) One Phonemic Entity Becomes Two: The Case of 'Short A' in American Speech: 3rd ed. Vol. 15: Duke UP. 256. Print.
  49. Labov (2006:61)
  50. 50.0 50.1 Wells (1982b:476)
  51. Vaux, Bert and Scott Golder (2003). "Do you pronounce 'cot' and 'çaught' the same?" The Harvard Dialect Survey. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Linguistics Department.
  52. Vaux, Bert and Scott Golder (2003). "How do you pronounce Mary / merry / marry?" The Harvard Dialect Survey. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Linguistics Department.
  53. Kortmann (2004:295)
  54. Vaux, Bert and Scott Golder (2003). "flourish." The Harvard Dialect Survey. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Linguistics Department.
  55. Vaux, Bert and Scott Golder (2003). "the first vowel in "miracle" ." The Harvard Dialect Survey. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Linguistics Department.
  56. 56.0 56.1 56.2 Wells (2008:XXV)
  57. Kortmann (2004:343)
  58. Labov, Ash & Boberg (2006:104)
  59. Labov et al. (2006:114): "where Canadian raising has traditionally been reported: Canada, Eastern New England, Philadelphia, and the North"
  60. Wells (1982:479)



  • Boyce, S.; Espy-Wilson, C. (1997), "Coarticulatory stability in American English /r/", Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101 (6): 3741–3753, doi:10.1121/1.418333, PMID 9193061<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  • Delattre, P.; Freeman, D.C. (1968), "A dialect study of American R's by x-ray motion picture", Linguistics, 44: 29–68<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  • Hallé, Pierre A.; Best, Catherine T.; Levitt, Andrea (1999), "Phonetic vs. phonological influences on French listeners' perception of American English approximants", Journal of Phonetics, 27 (3): 281–306, doi:10.1006/jpho.1999.0097<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  • Jones, Daniel; Roach, Peter; Hartman, James (2006), Cambridge English Pronouncing Dictionary (17 ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  • Kortmann, Bernd; Schneider, Edgar W., eds. (2004), A Handbook of Varieties of English, Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  • Labov, William; Ash, Sharon; Boberg, Charles (2006), The Atlas of North American English, Berlin: Mouton-de Gruyter, pp. 187–208, ISBN 3-11-016746-8<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  • Mannell, R.; Cox, F.; Harrington, J. (2009a), An Introduction to Phonetics and Phonology, Macquarie University<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  • Mannell, R.; Cox, F.; Harrington, J. (2009b), An Introduction to Phonetics and Phonology, Macquarie University<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  • Roca, Iggy; Johnson, Wyn (1999), Course in Phonology, Blackwell Publishing<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  • Rogers, Henry (2000), The Sounds of Language: An Introduction to Phonetics, Essex: Pearson Education Limited, ISBN 978-0-582-38182-7<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  • Seabrook, John (May 19, 2005), "The Academy: Talking the Tawk", The New Yorker, retrieved 2008-05-14<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  • Shitara, Yuko (1993), "A survey of American pronunciation preferences", Speech Hearing and Language, 7: 201–232<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  • Silverstein, Bernard (1994), NTC's Dictionary of American English Pronunciation, Lincolnwood, Illinois: NTC Publishing Group, ISBN 0-8442-0726-8<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  • Thomas, Erik R. (2001), An acoustic analysis of vowel variation in New World English, Publication of the American Dialect Society, 85, Duke University Press for the American Dialect Society, ISSN 0002-8207<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  • Van Riper, William R. (2014) [1973], "General American: An Ambiguity", in Allen, Harold B.; Linn, Michael D. (eds.), Dialect and Language Variation, Elsevier<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  • Wells, John C. (1982a), Accents of English, 1, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0-521-22919-7<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  • Wells, John C. (1982b), Accents of English, 3, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0-521-24225-8<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  • Wells, John C. (2008), Longman Pronunciation Dictionary (3rd ed.), Longman, ISBN 9781405881180<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  • Zawadzki, P.A.; Kuehn, D.P. (1980), "A cineradiographic study of static and dynamic aspects of American English /r/", Phonetica, 37 (4): 253–266, doi:10.1159/000259995, PMID 7443796<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>

Further reading

External links