Geoid
Geodesy  

Fundamentals  
Concepts  
Technologies  
Standards  


History  
The geoid is the shape that the surface of the oceans would take under the influence of Earth's gravitation and rotation alone, in the absence of other influences such as winds and tides. This surface is extended through the continents (such as with very narrow hypothetical canals). All points on the geoid have the same gravity potential energy (the sum of gravitational potential energy and centrifugal potential energy). The force of gravity acts everywhere perpendicular to the geoid, meaning that plumb lines point perpendicular and water levels parallel to the geoid.
Specifically, the geoid is the equipotential surface that would coincide with the mean ocean surface of the Earth if the oceans and atmosphere were in equilibrium, at rest relative to the rotating Earth,^{[1]} and extended through the continents (such as with very narrow canals). According to Gauss, who first described it, it is the "mathematical figure of the Earth", a smooth but highly irregular surface whose shape results from the uneven distribution of mass within and on the surface of the Earth. It does not correspond to the actual surface of the Earth's crust, but to a surface which can only be known through extensive gravitational measurements and calculations. Despite being an important concept for almost two hundred years in the history of geodesy and geophysics, it has only been defined to high precision in recent decades^{[when?]}. It is often described as the true physical figure of the Earth,^{[1]} in contrast to the idealized geometrical figure of a reference ellipsoid.
The surface of the geoid is higher than the reference ellipsoid wherever there is a positive gravity anomaly (mass excess) and lower than the reference ellipsoid wherever there is a negative gravity anomaly (mass deficit).^{[2]}
Contents
Description
The geoid surface is irregular, unlike the reference ellipsoid which is a mathematical idealized representation of the physical Earth, but considerably smoother than Earth's physical surface. Although the physical Earth has excursions of +8,848 m (Mount Everest) and −429 m (Dead Sea), the geoid's variation ranges from −106 to +85 m, less than 200 m total^{[4]} compared to a perfect mathematical ellipsoid.
If the ocean surface were isopycnic (of constant density) and undisturbed by tides, currents, or weather, it would closely approximate the geoid. The permanent deviation between the geoid and mean sea level is called ocean surface topography. If the continental land masses were crisscrossed by a series of tunnels or canals, the sea level in these canals would also very nearly coincide with the geoid. In reality the geoid does not have a physical meaning under the continents, but geodesists are able to derive the heights of continental points above this imaginary, yet physically defined, surface by a technique called spirit leveling.
Being an equipotential surface, the geoid is by definition a surface to which the force of gravity is everywhere perpendicular. This means that when travelling by ship, one does not notice the undulations of the geoid; the local vertical (plumb line) is always perpendicular to the geoid and the local horizon tangential to it. Likewise, spirit levels will always be parallel to the geoid.
Note that a GPS receiver on a ship may, during the course of a long voyage, indicate height variations, even though the ship will always be at sea level (tides not considered). This is because GPS satellites, orbiting about the center of gravity of the Earth, can only measure heights relative to a geocentric reference ellipsoid. To obtain one's geoidal height, a raw GPS reading must be corrected. Conversely, height determined by spirit leveling from a tidal measurement station, as in traditional land surveying, will always be geoidal height. Modern GPS receivers have a grid implemented inside where they obtain the geoid (e.g. EGM96) height over the World Geodetic System (WGS) ellipsoid from the current position. Then they are able to correct the height above WGS ellipsoid to the height above WGS84 geoid. In that case when the height is not zero on a ship it is due to various other factors such as ocean tides, atmospheric pressure (meteorological effects) and local sea surface topography.
Simplified example
The gravitational field of the earth is neither perfect nor uniform. A flattened ellipsoid is typically used as the idealized earth, but even if the earth were perfectly spherical, the strength of gravity would not be the same everywhere, because density (and therefore mass) varies throughout the planet. This is due to magma distributions, mountain ranges, deep sea trenches, and so on.
If that perfect sphere were then covered in water, the water would not be the same height everywhere. Instead, the water level would be higher or lower depending on the particular strength of gravity in that location.
Spherical harmonics representation
Spherical harmonics are often used to approximate the shape of the geoid. The current best such set of spherical harmonic coefficients is EGM96 (Earth Gravity Model 1996),^{[5]} determined in an international collaborative project led by NIMA. The mathematical description of the nonrotating part of the potential function in this model is:^{[6]}
where and are geocentric (spherical) latitude and longitude respectively, are the fully normalized associated Legendre polynomials of degree and order , and and are the numerical coefficients of the model based on measured data. Note that the above equation describes the Earth's gravitational potential , not the geoid itself, at location the coordinate being the geocentric radius, i.e., distance from the Earth's centre. The geoid is a particular^{[6]} equipotential surface, and is somewhat involved to compute. The gradient of this potential also provides a model of the gravitational acceleration. EGM96 contains a full set of coefficients to degree and order 360 (i.e. ), describing details in the global geoid as small as 55 km (or 110 km, depending on your definition of resolution). The number of coefficients, and , can be determined by first observing in the equation for V that for a specific value of n there are two coefficients for every value of m except for m = 0. There is only one coefficient when m=0 since . There are thus (2n+1) coefficients for every value of n. Using these facts and the formula, , it follows that the total number of coefficients is given by
 using the EGM96 value of .
For many applications the complete series is unnecessarily complex and is truncated after a few (perhaps several dozen) terms.
New even higher resolution models are currently under development. For example, many of the authors of EGM96 are working on an updated model^{[7]} that should incorporate much of the new satellite gravity data (see, e.g., GRACE), and should support up to degree and order 2160 (1/6 of a degree, requiring over 4 million coefficients).
NGA has announced the availability of EGM2008, complete to spherical harmonic degree and order 2159, and contains additional coefficients extending to degree 2190 and order 2159.^{[8]} Software and data is on the Earth Gravitational Model 2008 (EGM2008)  WGS 84 Version] page.^{[8]}
Precise geoid
This article relies excessively on partisan sources.
(June 2014) 
The 1990s saw important discoveries in the theory of geoid computation. The Precise Geoid Solution by Vaníček and coworkers improved on the Stokesian approach to geoid computation.^{[9]} Their solution enables millimetretocentimetre accuracy in geoid computation, an orderofmagnitude improvement from previous classical solutions.^{[10]}^{[11]}^{[12]}
Causes for geoid anomalies
Variations in the height of the geoidal surface are related to density anomalous distributions within the Earth. Geoid measures help thus to understand the internal structure of the planet. Synthetic calculations show that the geoidal signature of a thickened crust (for example, in orogenic belts produced by continental collision) is positive, opposite to what should be expected if the thickening affects the entire lithosphere.
Timevariability
Recent satellite missions, such as GOCE and GRACE, have enabled the study of timevariable geoid signals. The first products based on GOCE satellite data became available online in June 2010, through the European Space Agency (ESA)’s Earth observation user services tools.^{[13]}^{[14]} ESA launched the satellite in March 2009 on a mission to map Earth's gravity with unprecedented accuracy and spatial resolution. On 31 March 2011, the new geoid model was unveiled at the Fourth International GOCE User Workshop hosted at the Technische Universität München in Munich, Germany.^{[15]} Studies using the timevariable geoid computed from GRACE data have provided information on global hydrologic cycles,^{[16]} mass balances of ice sheets,^{[17]} and postglacial rebound.^{[18]} From postglacial rebound measurements, timevariable GRACE data can be used to deduce the viscosity of Earth's mantle.^{[19]}
Celestial bodies
This section requires expansion. (June 2014)

The concept of the geoid has been extended to other planets and also moons,^{[20]} as well as asteroids.^{[citation needed]}
See also
References
 ↑ ^{1.0} ^{1.1} http://www.soest.hawaii.edu/GG/FACULTY/conrad/classes/GG612_S11/Lecture_03.pdf
 ↑ Fowler, C.M.R. (2005). The Solid Earth; An Introduction to Global Geophysics. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. p. 214. ISBN 9780521584098.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
 ↑ "NGA: (U) WGS 84, N=M=180 Earth Gravitational Model (UNCLASSIFIED)". nga.mil.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
 ↑ "GRACE  Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment". utexas.edu.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
 ↑ "NGA: DoD World Geodetic System 1984". nga.mil.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
 ↑ ^{6.0} ^{6.1} "There is no such thing as "The" EGM96 geoid: Subtle points on the use of a global geopotential model". noaa.gov.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
 ↑ Pavlis, N.K., S.A. Holmes. S. Kenyon, D. Schmit, R. Trimmer, "Gravitational potential expansion to degree 2160", IAG International Symposium, gravity, geoid and Space Mission GGSM2004, Porto, Portugal, 2004.
 ↑ ^{8.0} ^{8.1} "Earth Gravitational Model 2008 (EGM2008)". nga.mil.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
 ↑ "UNB Precise Geoid Determination Package". Archived from the original on 20 November 2007. Retrieved 2 October 2007.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
 ↑ Vaníček, P.; Kleusberg, A. (1987). "The Canadian geoidStokesian approach". Manuscripta Geodaetica. 12 (2): 86–98.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
 ↑ Vaníček, P.; Martinec, Z. (1994). "Compilation of a precise regional geoid" (PDF). Manuscripta Geodaetica. 19: 119–128.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
 ↑ Vaníček et al. Compilation of a precise regional geoid (pdf), pp.45, Report for Geodetic Survey Division  DSS Contract: #2324414405/01SS, Ottawa (1995)
 ↑ esa. "ESA makes first GOCE dataset available". European Space Agency.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
 ↑ esa. "GOCE giving new insights into Earth's gravity". European Space Agency.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
 ↑ esa. "Earth's gravity revealed in unprecedented detail". European Space Agency.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
 ↑ Schmidt, R; Schwintzer, P; Flechtner, F; Reigber, C; Guntner, A; Doll, P; Ramillien, G; Cazenave, A; et al. (2006). "GRACE observations of changes in continental water storage". Global and Planetary Change. 50: 112. Bibcode:2006GPC....50..112S. doi:10.1016/j.gloplacha.2004.11.018.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
 ↑ Ramillien, G; Lombard, A; Cazenave, A; Ivins, E; Llubes, M; Remy, F; Biancale, R (2006). "Interannual variations of the mass balance of the Antarctica and Greenland ice sheets from GRACE". Global and Planetary Change. 53 (3): 198. Bibcode:2006GPC....53..198R. doi:10.1016/j.gloplacha.2006.06.003.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
 ↑ Vanderwal, W; Wu, P; Sideris, M; Shum, C (2008). "Use of GRACE determined secular gravity rates for glacial isostatic adjustment studies in NorthAmerica". Journal of Geodynamics. 46 (3–5): 144. Bibcode:2008JGeo...46..144V. doi:10.1016/j.jog.2008.03.007.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
 ↑ Paulson, Archie; Zhong, Shijie; Wahr, John (2007). "Inference of mantle viscosity from GRACE and relative sea level data". Geophysical Journal International. 171 (2): 497. Bibcode:2007GeoJI.171..497P. doi:10.1111/j.1365246X.2007.03556.x.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
 ↑ Wieczorek, M. A. (2007). "Gravity and Topography of the Terrestrial Planets". Treatise on Geophysics. p. 165. doi:10.1016/B9780444527486.001565. ISBN 9780444527486.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
External links
 Main NGA (was NIMA) page on Earth gravity models
 International Geoid Service (IGeS)
 EGM96 NASA GSFC Earth gravity model
 Earth Gravitational Model 2008 (EGM2008, Released in July 2008)
 NOAA Geoid webpage
 GeographicLib provides a utility GeoidEval (with source code) to evaluate the geoid height for the EGM84, EGM96, and EGM2008 earth gravity models. Here is an online version of GeoidEval.
 Kiamehr's Geoid Home Page
 A free windows calculator which yields, among other calculation, the height difference between EGM96 geoid and mean sea level at every point on earth
 Geoid tutorial from Li and Gotze (964KB pdf file)
 Geoid tutorial at GRACE website
 Precise Geoid Determination Based on the LeastSquares Modification of Stokes’ Formula(PhD Thesis PDF)
 View EGM2008, EGM96 and EGM84 on Google Maps
 H. Moritz (2011). "A contemporary perspective of geoid structure". Journal of Geodetic Science. Versita. 1 (March): 82–87. Bibcode:2011JGeoS...1...82M. doi:10.2478/v1015601000107.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>