Human rights violations in Pinochet's Chile

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search

Human rights violations during the military government of Chile refer to the acts of human rights abuses, persecution of opponents, political repression and state terrorism committed by the Chilean armed forces and the Police, government agents and civilians in the service of security agencies, during the dictatorship of Augusto Pinochet in Chile from September 11, 1973, until March 11, 1990.

According to the Commission of Truth and Reconciliation (Rettig Commission) and the National Commission on Political Imprisonment and Torture (Valech Commission), the number of direct victims of human rights violations in Chile accounts for at least 35,000 people: 28,000 tortured, 2,279 executed, and 1,248 missing. In addition, some 200,000 people suffered exile and an unknown number went through clandestine centers and illegal detention.

The systematic human rights violations that were committed by the military government of Chile, under General Augusto Pinochet, included gruesome acts of physical and sexual abuse, as well as psychological damage. From September 11, 1973 to March 11, 1990, Chilean armed forces, the police and all those aligned with the military junta were involved in institutionalizing fear and terror in Chile.[1]

The most prevalent forms of state-sponsored torture that Chilean prisoners endured were electric shocks, waterboarding, beatings, and sexual abuse. Another common mechanism of torture employed was “disappearing” those who were deemed to be potentially subversive because they adhered to the Leftist doctrine. The tactic of “disappearing” the enemies of the Pinochet regime was systematically carried out during the first four years of military rule. The "disappeared" were held in secret, subjected to torture and were often never seen again. Both the National Commission on Political Imprisonment and Torture (Valech Report) and the Commission of Truth and Reconciliation (Rettig Report) approximate that there were 35,000 victims of human rights abuses in Chile, with 28,000 tortured, 2,279 executed and 1,248 “disappeared.”[2]

History

The military rule was characterized by systematic suppression of all political dissidence, which led some to speak of a "politicide" (or "political genocide").[4] Steve J. Stern spoke of a politicide to describe "a systematic project to destroy an entire way of doing and understanding politics and governance."[5]

The worst violence occurred in the first three months of the coup's aftermath, with the number of suspected leftists killed or "disappeared" (desaparecidos) soon reaching into the thousand.[6] In the days immediately following the coup, the Assistant Secretary of State for Inter-American Affairs informed Henry Kissinger, that the National Stadium was being used to hold 5,000 prisoners, and as late as 1975, the CIA was still reporting that up to 3,811 prisoners were still being held in the Stadium.[7] Amnesty International, reported that as many as 7,000 political prisoners in the National Stadium had been counted on 22 September 1973.[8] Nevertheless, it is often quoted in the press, that some 40,000 prisoners were detained in the Stadium.[9] Some of the most famous cases of "desaparecidos" are Charles Horman, a U.S. citizen who was killed during the coup itself,[10] Chilean songwriter Víctor Jara, and the October 1973 Caravan of Death (Caravana de la Muerte) where at least 70 persons were killed.[11] Other operations include Operation Colombo during which hundreds of left-wing activists were murdered and Operation Condor, carried out with the security services of other Latin American dictatorships.

File:Memorial DDHH Chile 60 las sillas.jpg
Memorial to victims of the Dirty war in Chile

Following Pinochet's defeat in the 1988 plebiscite, the 1991 Rettig Commission, a multipartisan effort from the Aylwin administration to discover the truth about the human-rights violations, listed a number of torture and detention centers (such as Colonia Dignidad, the ship Esmeralda or Víctor Jara Stadium), and found that at least 3,200 people were killed or disappeared by the regime.

A later report, the Valech Report (published in November 2004), confirmed the figure of 3,200 deaths but dramatically reduced the alleged cases of disappearances. It tells of some 28,000 arrests in which the majority of those detained were incarcerated and in a great many cases tortured.[12] Some 30,000 Chileans were exiled and received abroad,[13][14][15] in particular in Argentina, as political refugees; however, they were followed in their exile by the DINA secret police, in the frame of Operation Condor which linked South-American dictatorships together against political opponents.[16] Some 20,000-40,000 Chilean exiles were holders of passports stamped with the letter "L" (which stood for lista nacional), identifyng them as persona non grata and had to seek permission before entering the country.[17] Nevertheless, Chilean Human Rights groups maintain several hundred thousand were forced into exile.[14]

According to the Latin American Institute on Mental Health and Human Rights (ILAS), "situations of extreme trauma" affected about 200,000 persons; this figure includes individuals killed, tortured (following the UN definition of torture), or exiled and their immediate relatives.[citation needed] While more radical groups such as the Movement of the Revolutionary Left (MIR) were staunch advocates of a Marxist revolution, it is currently accepted that the junta deliberately targeted nonviolent political opponents as well

A court in Chile sentenced, on March 19, 2008, 24 former police officers in cases of kidnapping, torture and murder that happened just after a U.S.-backed coup overthrew President Salvador Allende, a Socialist, on September 11, 1973.[18]

Bureaucratic authoritarianism

The concept of bureaucratic authoritarianism characterizes the military regimes that rose to power in South America between the 1960s and 1980s, specifically in the Southern Cone regions of Argentina, Chile, Paraguay and Uruguay. These regimes had a technocratic approach to policy-making, and were accompanied by substantial repression. Guillermo O’Donnell—a prominent Argentine political scientist— labeled these regimes as “bureaucratic authoritarian” in order to “distinguish them from oligarchical and populist forms of authoritarian rule found in less modernized countries.”[19]

From its inception on September 11, 1973, the Chilean bureaucratic authoritarian regime’s ultimate agenda was to repress political dissidents—which some have classified as “politicide” (or “political genocide).[20] General Pinochet’s assumption of power through a violent, and bloody military coup d’état foreshadowed the brutal conditions that many innocent people would endure over the next 17 years. Pinochet genuinely feared the supporters of the Popular Unity Party (PU) and its leader President Salvador Allende, who had been the first Marxist to become President of a Latin American region through open elections.[21] General Pinochet lived in a state of paranoia, and constantly feared being assassinated or losing power.[22] Thus, he set out to destroy those who were not in unity with his policies, particularly those who had once served the PU.

As Pinochet’s suspicions grew, the military dictator targeted anyone who was in someway associated with the “leftists,” which even included the mothers, wives and children of the potential subversives.[23] In order to legitimize control of the country, Pinochet created institutions that were seemingly democratic. He organized a plebiscite on October 21, 1980 and drafted a new Constitution that validated the legal system he had established by decree. The Constitution proscribed an 8- year election period, permitted reelections and gave the President of the Republic an immense amount of power. Laws were passed to criminalize acts of terror and limit the use of ''habeas corpus.[24] A crucial aspect of the Pinochet regime was how unified the military was. Another was the disarray of civilian society, which created an atmosphere that was conducive to repressing all those who supposedly supported the PU, other leftist organizations, and even Centrist institutions like the Christian Democratic Party.[25]

Instilling a Sense of Fear

Caravan of Death

From the moment Pinochet assumed power, he wanted to instill a sense of fear in the Chilean population. These fears manifested with his authorization of the “Caravan of Death. Following the coup on September 11, Pinochet ordered this Chilean Army death squad to target the leaders of the PU by any means necessary. The Caravan of Death, under the leadership of Sergio Arellano Stark, killed 68 people within three days, by stabbing, beating and shooting them. The establishment of the Caravan of Death served three main purposes: 1) silence dissent through murder, 2) weed out military officials who were not aligned with Pinochet’s regime and 3) establish fear within leadership ranks. The Caravan of Death resulted in the institutionalization of a state-sponsored system of terror.[26]

DINA

On June 14, 1974, Junta Decree 521 mandated for the creation of the National Intelligence Directorate (DINA). There were thousands of people working in this agency. DINA was instituted to “produce the intelligence necessary to formulate policies and planning, and to adopt measures to procure the safeguarding of National Security and development of the country.”[27] DINA established interrogation and detention camps, in which former members of Allende’s Marxist government and the Leftist movements like the Movimiento de Izquierda Revolucionario were incarcerated and brutally tortured.[28] Pinochet’s goal was to annihilate all forms of opposition. He therefore greatly supported Military Decree 1697, which outlawed the formation of any political party. A large proportion of the Chilean population was vulnerable to surveillance. Chile’s churches, universities, businesses, and neighborhoods were all under intense scrutiny.[29]

Joint Command

The Joint Command operated as a de facto institution from late 1975 until late 1976, and was based primarily in Santiago, Chile. Like DINA, this institution coordinated intelligence activities and political repression, with the air force having a major role in carrying out its agendas. The Joint Command was responsible for “disappearing” approximately thirty people during the bureaucratic authoritarian era.[30]

State-sponsored torture and repression

From 1974 to 1977, DINA (National Intelligence Directorate) and other agencies such as the Joint Command were the main institutions responsible for committing most acts of repression. It was during this period when most of the forced disappearances took place. While these agencies committed barbaric acts of physical and sexual torture, they also caused an immense amount of psychological pain and suffering.

Detentions and torture centers

Intelligence agencies under Pinochet’s regime instituted secret detention and torture sites to conduct political repression. In total, Chile had 17 torture centers.[31] On occasion, prisoners were released after being confined and tortured. However, many detainees were also killed and “disappeared.”

Cuatro Alamos

Cuatro Alamos was a detention center that no one outside the DINA had access to, except personnel from other intelligence agencies. It was instituted in 1973, during the earliest phase of the regime. Life in Cuatro Alamos was relatively easier than it was in other detention sites. It consisted of twelve small cells, one large cell and staff offices. There were very few instances of torture within the walls of the prison.[30]

Londres No. 38

Londres No. 38 was a secret detention center located in downtown Santiago, where DINA members operated from 1973 until the end of 1974. This was one of the many sites that had been previously owned by leftist organizations. Prisoners at Londres No. 38 endured lengthy interrogation periods and continual humiliating treatment. Captors preferred to torture detainees by electrocuting them. Not only were the suspects incarcerated, but their relatives were also arrested. Family members underwent sexual abuse in the presence of their relatives. However, during the initial period, prisoners were still permitted to interact with one another and share information.[30]

Villa Grimaldi

Villa Grimaldi, located in Santiago, was DINA’s most important torture center that began operating in 1974. Prisoners were interrogated for long periods of time. Once people were incarcerated on a massive scale, new places were reconditioned to hold them. The “tower” was designated as a holding center for political prisoners. There was a water tank on the top floor of the building, which included ten tight spaces where prisoners were held. These spaces were so small that victims had to enter them by crawling on their knees. The tower also included a torture chamber, where prisoners were kept in isolation. Many of them were never seen again. Food was scarce and the conditions were extremely unsanitary.[30]

Physical torture

One torture method which was very commonly used was the “grill” or "La Parilla."[disambiguation needed] In this torture, electricity was fed from a standard wall outlet through a control box into two wires each terminating in electrodes. The control box gave the torturers the option of adjusting the voltage being administered to the prisoner. The naked prisoner was stretched out and strapped onto a metal bedframe, or a set of bedsprings, and tied down. He or she was subjected to electrical shocks on several parts of the body, especially on sensitive areas like the genitals and on open wounds. The Valech Report includes a testimony of a Chilean man who was interrogated by prison captors. They took off his clothes and “attached electrodes to his chest and testicles. They put something in his mouth so he would “bite his tongue while they shocked him.”[32] In another method, one of the wires would be fixed to the prisoner (typically to the victim's genitalia) while another wire could be applied to other parts of the body. This caused an electric current to pass through the victim's body, with a strength inversely proportional to the distance between the two electrodes. A smaller distance between the electrodes led to a stronger current and thus more intense pain for the prisoner. A particularly barbaric version of the "grill" was the use of a metal bunk bed; the victim was placed on the bottom bunk and on the top bunk, a relative or friend was simultaneously tortured.

Most prisoners suffered from severe beatings, and broken or even amputated limbs. At Villa Grimaldi, DINA forced non-compliant prisoners lie down on the ground. The captors ran over their legs with a large vehicle, and crushed the prisoners' bones.[33] The assailants also beat prisoners in the ear until they became deaf, and entirely unconscious; this torture method was called the "telephone."[34] Most of the acts of punishment were intended to severely humiliate the prisoners. At the Pisagua Concentration Camp, captors intimidated prisoners by forcing them to crawl on the ground and lick the dirt off the floors. If the prisoners complained or even collapsed from exhaustion, they were promptly executed.[35] Prisoners were also immersed into vats of excrement, and were occasionally forced to ingest it.[36][37]

Sexual abuse

Pinochet’s regime carried out many gruesome and horrific acts of sexual abuse against the victims. In fact, several detention sites were solely instituted for the purpose of sexually tormenting and humiliating the prisoners. Discothèque (La Venda Sexy) was another one of DINA’s main secret detention centers. Many of those who “disappeared” were initially held in this prison. The prison guards often raped both men and women. It was at this prison where internal repression operations were centralized. Militants anally raped male prisoners, while insulting them, in an attempt to embarrass them to their core.[38]

Women were the primary targets of gruesome acts of sexual abuse. According to the Valech Commission, almost every single female prisoner was a victim of repeated rape. Not only would military men rape women, they would also use foreign objects and even animals to inflict more pain and suffering. Women (and occasionally men) reported that spiders and live rats were often implanted on their genitals. One woman testified that she had been “raped and sexually assaulted with trained dogs and with live rats.” She was forced to have sex with her father and brother—who were also detained.[39]

Psychological repression

The military junta often framed leftist individuals and groups, in order to justify its agenda to target and torture political dissidents. The Junta fostered fear of leftists by staging arsenal captures and portraying leftist extremists in an extremely negative light. The regime falsely accused leftists of stealing dangerous weapons from weapons stores in order to justify the illegal capture of dissidents. Such fake portrayals of “the revolutionary threat” resulted in the legitimization of the Pinochet regime. The Junta commissioned the Chilean public to report the actions of any suspected leftists, and proceed to turn them in. General Pinochet also authorized for DINA to stage the bombing of a Chilean safe house. The blame was placed on the leftist extremists, in order to demonstrate the danger they posed to society. Essentially, the military junta made use of brainwashing propaganda to portray the leftists as the enemies.[40]

Psychological torture was used to destroy a prisoner's will, dignity, moral and physical revolve in order to extract pertinent information from the victim. Members of intelligence agencies like DINA and the Joint Command attempted to extract information from victims by threatening their children, and loved ones. Many mothers who were incarcerated in illegal detention centers had to choose between saving themselves or their children’s lives. On August 21, 1989, military personnel seized Jessica Antonia Liberona Ninoles and detained her in a dark, solitary room. She was stripped naked, forced to lie down on an uncomfortable prison cot and was not permitted to sleep for five days during the interrogation period. The captors constantly threatened to kidnap her nine-year-old daughter from school, if she failed to cooperate.[41]

According to the Valech Commission, waterboarding was one of the torture methods most commonly recorded by victims of imprisonment and torture. The captors poured water over a cloth that covered the victims’ faces and breathing passages, causing individuals to experience a drowning sensation, and a near-death experience. Waterboarding caused detainees to asphyxiate, while their heads were submerged into water several times in a row. Oftentimes, prisoners were hung upside-down with ropes, and they were dropped into a tank of water, headfirst. The water was contaminated and filled with debris. Waterboarding was employed to cause both physical and psychological pain; however, victims found that the mental suffering they endured was far worse than the physical pain. They attested that even thirty years after being “waterboarded,” they still suffered from the devastating effects of psychological torture. Many victims reported suffering from post traumatic stress disorder, humiliation, worthlessness, shame, anxiety and hopelessness.[42] The Valech Commission Report describes the testimony of a man who experienced waterboarding in September 1973:

They put cotton on both eyes, then taped them and tightened a hood around my neck. They tied my hands and legs, submerged me in a 250-liter tank that had ammonia, urine, excrement, and seawater. They submerged me until I could not breathe anymore. They repeated it over and over, while beating me and asking me questions. That is what they called the submarine.”[42]

Disappearances

While “disappearing subversives” was the central instrument of state terror administered by the Argentine military regime from the 1960s to the 1980s, it was still extremely widespread and prevalent in Chile as well. According to the Rettig Report, 1,248 people were “disappeared” by the Pinochet Regime. However, this number still remains a source of contention, as hundreds of bodies have yet to be discovered. There are several different approximations made for the number of people who had been "disappeared" by the military regime. Many of those who “disappeared” were not given the chance to escape nor become asylum seekers elsewhere.[43] Their bodies were deliberately hidden in undisclosed locations.

Only seven days after the General seized power through a ruthless military coup, he ordered the military to round up approximately 10,000 students, workers, political activists and jam them into Santiago’s National Soccer Stadium on September 18, 1973. This Stadium, that symbolized Chile’s greatest pastime, turned into a concentration camp within a few days. Many were tortured and gunned down, and several hundred bodies were shuttled into secret mass graves. These were victims of a well-organized program of official, yet clandestine, program of torture and murder.[44]

Many people were last seen in the detention and torture centers instituted by the intelligence agencies of the military regime. Following General Pinochet’s arrest in 1998, Chile made a renewed effort to uncover the atrocities of the past. For the first time in a several decades, human rights lawyers, and members of the armed forces wanted to investigate where the bodies of the “disappeared” were buried. On January 7, 2000, President Ricardo Lagos made a 15-minute nationwide address, revealing that the armed forces had uncovered information on the fate of approximately 180 people who had disappeared. According to Lagos, the bodies of at least 150 of these people were thrown into lakes, rivers and the Pacific Ocean. The whereabouts of hundreds of more bodies remain unknown.[45]

Institutionalized terrorism

The Chilean Military Dictatorship under General Augusto Pinochet erected a complex web of legal instruments that it used to repress anyone deemed to be "subversive." Pinochet was extremely tactical in his attempts to camouflage the human rights violations committed by the state. He called for a National Plebiscite in 1980 to approve the 1980 Political Constitution of the Republic of Chile— a seemingly democratic motive.[46] The General promised to cut back inflation, which was around 30-35% in 1978; he was intent on restructuring both the economic and political institutions of the region. These agendas were part of a broader scheme to garner approval from the state, making it more feasible to prosecute, imprison, and execute civilians suspected of subversion.[47] The military and armed personnel under Pinochet were able to operate offensively without restrictions, as the Chilean Government had been restructured to Pinochet's liking. Even the Constitution was drafted to give the General impunity. The military dictatorship utilized its own justice system to adjudicate the regime's enemies.[48] Additionally, the Amnesty Law decreed in 1978 by the General, guaranteed impunity to those responsible for the "systematic and widespread human rights violations and was a major obstacle to bringing Augusto Pinochet to justice in Chile."[49]Even today, "the Amnesty Law is still in force. It was recently applied by the Chilean Supreme Court in December 2007." While Pinochet was detained under house arrest on October 30, 2006, over "charges including, murder, torture and kidnapping in the years following his 1973 coup, he was never formally convicted. He passed away before the investigation process reached a conclusion.[50] Pinochet's Amnesty Law effectively insulated the military regime from retribution for even the most brutal and horrific human rights violations.

Repressive agencies

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

The Dirección de Inteligencia Nacional (English: National Intelligence Directorate) or DINA was the Chilean secret police in the government of Augusto Pinochet. DINA was established in November 1973, as a Chilean Army intelligence unit headed by General Manuel Contreras and vice-director Raúl Iturriaga, who fled from justice in 2007. It was separated from the army and made an independent administrative unit in June 1974, under the aegis of decree #521. DINA made it possible for Augusto Pinochet to come to power.

DINA existed until 1977, after which it was renamed the Central Nacional de Informaciones (CNI) (National Information Center).

Main human rights violators

Since human rights violations during the military regime corresponded to a state policy, the number of people involved in these acts as authors, accomplices or accessories, is high. While it is difficult to determine their number, it is estimated that exceeds several hundred. Approximately sixty persons have been condemned by Chilean courts.[51]

See also

References

  1. "Thomas Skidmore, Modern Latin America, Oxford University Press., 2004, p. 134
  2. " Report of the Chilean National Commission on Truth and Reconciliation", (Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 1993), vol. I/II, Foreword, xxi-xxii., http://www.usip.org/files/resources/collections/truth_commissions/Chile90-Report/Chile90-Report.pdf
  3. Pinochet Is History: But how will it remember him? National Review Symposium, December 11, 2006
  4. [1] The legacy of human-rights violations in the Southern Cone
  5. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  6. [2] BBC: Finding Chile's disappeared
  7. Thinking About Terrorism: The Threat to Civil Liberties in a Time of National Emergency, Michael E. Tigar, pp. 37-38, American Bar Association, 2007
  8. Chile: an Amnesty International report,, p. 16, Amnesty International Publications, 1974.
  9. [3] El campo de concentración de Pinochet cumple 70 años
  10. [4] New Information on the Murders of U.S. Citizens Charles Horman and Frank Teruggi by the Chilean Military
  11. [5] BBC: Caravan of Death
  12. [6] Valech Report
  13. Augusto Pinochet's Chile, Diana Childress, p.92, Twenty First century Books, 2009
  14. 14.0 14.1 Chile en el umbral de los noventa: quince años que condicionan el futuro, Jaime Gazmuri & Felipe Agüero, p. 121, Planeta, 1988
  15. Chile: One Carrot, Many Sticks, Monday, Aug. 22, 1983.TIME MAGAZINE.
  16. [7] LIFTING OF PINOCHET'S IMMUNITY RENEWS FOCUS ON OPERATION CONDOR
  17. Chile since the coup: ten years of repression, Cynthia G. Brown, pp.88-89, Americas Watch, 1983.
  18. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  19. Karen L. Remmer and Gilbert W. Merkx, “Bureaucratic-Authoritarianism Revisited,” Latin American Research Review 17: 2 (1982), 3-4, http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/2503143?uid=3739256&uid=2&uid=4&sid=21101962130133
  20. Luis Roniger and Mario Sznajder, The Legacy of Human Rights Violations in the Southern Cone: Argentina, Chile and Uruguay, 1999, p.10
  21. "Profile Salvador Allende," BBC, September 8, 2003., http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3089846.stm
  22. Roger Burbach, “The Pinochet Affair. State Terrorism and Global Justice,” Nueva Epoca 5:17 (2005), 290-292.
  23. Rex A. Hudson, ed. "Chile: A Country Study". GPO for the Library of Congress, 1995.
  24. Christian Correa, "Waterboarding Prisoners and Justifying Torture:Lessons for the U.S. from the Chilean Experience,"Human Rights Brief 14, no. 2 (2007): p. 21, ,http://www.wcl.american.edu/hrbrief/14/2correa.pdf
  25. Thomas Skidmore, p. 134
  26. " Report of the Chilean National Commission on Truth and Reconciliation," http://www.usip.org/files/resources/collections/truth_commissions/Chile90-Report/Chile90-Report.pdf
  27. Pamela Constable and Aruto Valenzuela, A Nation of Enemies: Chile Under Pinochet, New York: W.W Norton & Company, 1993., p. 91
  28. "Report of the Chilean National Commission on Truth and Reconciliation," http://www.usip.org/files/resources/collections/truth_commissions/Chile90-Report/Chile90-Report.pdf
  29. Pamela Constable and Aruto Valenzuela, p.91
  30. 30.0 30.1 30.2 30.3 “Report of the Chilean National Commission on Truth and Reconciliation,” http://www.usip.org/library/tc/doc/reports/chile/chile_1993_pt2_ch2.html
  31. John Charles Chasteen, Born in Blood and Fire: A Concise History of Latin America, W.W Norton and Company, 2001, 301.
  32. Peter Kornbluh, The Pinochet File: a Declassified Dossier on Atrocity and Accountability: New York Press, 2003, p. 181
  33. Temma Kaplan, Taking Back the Streets: Women, Youth, and Direct Democracy. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2004
  34. Peter Kornbluh, p. 171
  35. Pamela Constable and Aruto Valenzuela, p.22
  36. Peter Kornbluh (September 11, 2013). The Pinochet File: A Declassified Dossier on Atrocity and Accountability. The New Press. ISBN 1595589120 p. 171.
  37. Lubna Z. Qureshi (2009). Nixon, Kissinger, and Allende: U.S. Involvement in the 1973 Coup in Chile. Lexington Books. p. 135 ISBN 0739126563
  38. Peter Kornbluh, The Pinochet File: A Declassified Dossier on Atrocity and Accountability, 169-170
  39. “Informe de la Comisión Nacional sobre Prisión Política y Tortura,” National Commission Report on Political Prisoners and Torture,” 2005, 249-250
  40. Peter Kornbluh, The Pinochet File: A Declassified Dossier on Atrocity and Accountability, p. 181
  41. “Pinochet: The Case Against,” The Guardian U.K, September 27, 1999. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/1999/sep/28/pinochet.chile1
  42. 42.0 42.1 Christian Correa, "Waterboarding Prisoners and Justifying Torture:Lessons for the U.S. from the Chilean Experience,"p.22-23
  43. Informe de la Comisión Nacional sobre Prisión Política y Tortura,” National Commission Report on Political Prisoners and Torture,” 2005.
  44. John Charles Chasteen, 304
  45. James Reynolds, “Finding Chile’s Disappeared,” BBC News, January 10, 2001. Accessed April 25, 2013.
  46. Christian Correa, "Waterboarding Prisoners and Justifying Torture:Lessons for the U.S. from the Chilean Experience,"p.22
  47. John Charles Chasteen, 301
  48. Thomas O'Keefe, "The Use of the Military Justice System to Try Civilians in Chile", 61 N.Y. St. Bar J. 46 (1989)
  49. "The case against Augusto Pinochet," Amnesty International, October 16, 2008, http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/asset/AMR22/004/2008/en/310008e6-915b-11dd-88fe-eb153597f981/amr220042008en.html
  50. "Pinochet Held on Murder and Torture Charges,"The Guardian U.K, October 30, 2006.http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2006/oct/30/chile.pinochet
  51. 51.0 51.1 51.2 51.3 51.4 51.5 Condenan a seis miembros de la DINA por cinco crímenes en Tejas Verdes, retrieved on 31 January 2013. The 6th is Manuel Contreras
  52. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  53. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  54. La Nación - Los sabuesos de los derechos humanos. Brigada de Asuntos Especiales de investigaciones
  55. El Mercurio - Condenan a 14 ex agentes de la CNI por crimen de José Carrasco Tapia
  56. El Mercurio - Texto completo del fallo de desafuero de Pinochet (I parte)
  57. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  58. Fernández Larios acusado en Miami por "caravana de la muerte"
  59. Memoria Viva - Humberto Gordon
  60. La Nación - Carlos Herrera Jiménez insiste en culpar a ex edecán Krauss de crímenes de Pisagua
  61. La Nación - Procesan a ex agentes por crimen de primo de Martínez Busch
  62. [8] Memoria Viva - Miguel Krassnoff
  63. Punto Final - Torturador al descubierto
  64. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  65. El Austral - Alta tensión en juicio contra Alfonso Podlech
  66. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.