|Part of a series about|
Hydroelectricity is the term referring to electricity generated by hydropower; the production of electrical power through the use of the gravitational force of falling or flowing water. It is the most widely used form of renewable energy, accounting for 16 percent of global electricity generation – 3,427 terawatt-hours of electricity production in 2010, and is expected to increase about 3.1% each year for the next 25 years.
Hydropower is produced in 150 countries, with the Asia-Pacific region generating 32 percent of global hydropower in 2010. China is the largest hydroelectricity producer, with 721 terawatt-hours of production in 2010, representing around 17 percent of domestic electricity use.
The cost of hydroelectricity is relatively low, making it a competitive source of renewable electricity. The average cost of electricity from a hydro station larger than 10 megawatts is 3 to 5 U.S. cents per kilowatt-hour. It is also a flexible source of electricity since the amount produced by the station can be changed up or down very quickly to adapt to changing energy demands. However, damming interrupts the flow of rivers and can harm local ecosystems, and building large dams and reservoirs often involves displacing people and wildlife. Once a hydroelectric complex is constructed, the project produces no direct waste, and has a considerably lower output level of the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide (CO2) than fossil fuel powered energy plants.
- 1 History
- 2 Generating methods
- 3 Sizes, types and capacities of hydroelectric facilities
- 4 Advantages and disadvantages
- 4.1 Advantages
- 4.2 Disadvantages
- 4.3 Comparison with other methods of power generation
- 5 World hydroelectric capacity
- 6 Major projects under construction
- 7 See also
- 8 References
- 9 External links
Hydropower has been used since ancient times to grind flour and perform other tasks. In the mid-1770s, French engineer Bernard Forest de Bélidor published Architecture Hydraulique which described vertical- and horizontal-axis hydraulic machines. By the late 19th century, the electrical generator was developed and could now be coupled with hydraulics. The growing demand for the Industrial Revolution would drive development as well. In 1878 the world's first hydroelectric power scheme was developed at Cragside in Northumberland, England by William George Armstrong. It was used to power a single arc lamp in his art gallery. The old Schoelkopf Power Station No. 1 near Niagara Falls in the U.S. side began to produce electricity in 1881. The first Edison hydroelectric power station, the Vulcan Street Plant, began operating September 30, 1882, in Appleton, Wisconsin, with an output of about 12.5 kilowatts. By 1886 there were 45 hydroelectric power stations in the U.S. and Canada. By 1889 there were 200 in the U.S. alone.
At the beginning of the 20th century, many small hydroelectric power stations were being constructed by commercial companies in mountains near metropolitan areas. Grenoble, France held the International Exhibition of Hydropower and Tourism with over one million visitors. By 1920 as 40% of the power produced in the United States was hydroelectric, the Federal Power Act was enacted into law. The Act created the Federal Power Commission to regulate hydroelectric power stations on federal land and water. As the power stations became larger, their associated dams developed additional purposes to include flood control, irrigation and navigation. Federal funding became necessary for large-scale development and federally owned corporations, such as the Tennessee Valley Authority (1933) and the Bonneville Power Administration (1937) were created. Additionally, the Bureau of Reclamation which had begun a series of western U.S. irrigation projects in the early 20th century was now constructing large hydroelectric projects such as the 1928 Hoover Dam. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers was also involved in hydroelectric development, completing the Bonneville Dam in 1937 and being recognized by the Flood Control Act of 1936 as the premier federal flood control agency.
Hydroelectric power stations continued to become larger throughout the 20th century. Hydropower was referred to as white coal for its power and plenty. Hoover Dam's initial 1,345 MW power station was the world's largest hydroelectric power station in 1936; it was eclipsed by the 6809 MW Grand Coulee Dam in 1942. The Itaipu Dam opened in 1984 in South America as the largest, producing 14,000 MW but was surpassed in 2008 by the Three Gorges Dam in China at 22,500 MW. Hydroelectricity would eventually supply some countries, including Norway, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Paraguay and Brazil, with over 85% of their electricity. The United States currently has over 2,000 hydroelectric power stations that supply 6.4% of its total electrical production output, which is 49% of its renewable electricity.
Most hydroelectric power comes from the potential energy of dammed water driving a water turbine and generator. The power extracted from the water depends on the volume and on the difference in height between the source and the water's outflow. This height difference is called the head. A large pipe (the "penstock") delivers water from the reservoir to the turbine.
This method produces electricity to supply high peak demands by moving water between reservoirs at different elevations. At times of low electrical demand, the excess generation capacity is used to pump water into the higher reservoir. When the demand becomes greater, water is released back into the lower reservoir through a turbine. Pumped-storage schemes currently provide the most commercially important means of large-scale grid energy storage and improve the daily capacity factor of the generation system. Pumped storage is not an energy source, and appears as a negative number in listings.
Run-of-the-river hydroelectric stations are those with small or no reservoir capacity, so that only the water coming from upstream is available for generation at that moment, and any oversupply must pass unused. A constant supply of water from a lake or existing reservoir upstream is a significant advantage in choosing sites for run-of-the-river. In the United States, run of the river hydropower could potentially provide 60,000 megawatts (80,000,000 hp) (about 13.7% of total use in 2011 if continuously available).
A tidal power station makes use of the daily rise and fall of ocean water due to tides; such sources are highly predictable, and if conditions permit construction of reservoirs, can also be dispatchable to generate power during high demand periods. Less common types of hydro schemes use water's kinetic energy or undammed sources such as undershot waterwheels. Tidal power is viable in a relatively small number of locations around the world. In Great Britain, there are eight sites that could be developed, which have the potential to generate 20% of the electricity used in 2012.
Sizes, types and capacities of hydroelectric facilities
Large-scale hydroelectric power stations are more commonly seen as the largest power producing facilities in the world, with some hydroelectric facilities capable of generating more than double the installed capacities of the current largest nuclear power stations.
Although no official definition exists for the capacity range of large hydroelectric power stations, facilities from over a few hundred megawatts are generally considered large hydroelectric facilities.
|1.||Three Gorges Dam||China||Lua error in Module:Coordinates at line 668: callParserFunction: function "#coordinates" was not found.||22,500|
|2.||Itaipu Dam|| Brazil
|Lua error in Module:Coordinates at line 668: callParserFunction: function "#coordinates" was not found.||14,000|
|3.||Xiluodu Dam||China||Lua error in Module:Coordinates at line 668: callParserFunction: function "#coordinates" was not found.||13,860|
Small hydro is the development of hydroelectric power on a scale serving a small community or industrial plant. The definition of a small hydro project varies but a generating capacity of up to 10 megawatts (MW) is generally accepted as the upper limit of what can be termed small hydro. This may be stretched to 25 MW and 30 MW in Canada and the United States. Small-scale hydroelectricity production grew by 28% during 2008 from 2005, raising the total world small-hydro capacity to 85 GW. Over 70% of this was in China (65 GW), followed by Japan (3.5 GW), the United States (3 GW), and India (2 GW).
Small hydro stations may be connected to conventional electrical distribution networks as a source of low-cost renewable energy. Alternatively, small hydro projects may be built in isolated areas that would be uneconomic to serve from a network, or in areas where there is no national electrical distribution network. Since small hydro projects usually have minimal reservoirs and civil construction work, they are seen as having a relatively low environmental impact compared to large hydro. This decreased environmental impact depends strongly on the balance between stream flow and power production.
Micro hydro is a term used for hydroelectric power installations that typically produce up to 100 kW of power. These installations can provide power to an isolated home or small community, or are sometimes connected to electric power networks. There are many of these installations around the world, particularly in developing nations as they can provide an economical source of energy without purchase of fuel. Micro hydro systems complement photovoltaic solar energy systems because in many areas, water flow, and thus available hydro power, is highest in the winter when solar energy is at a minimum.
Pico hydro is a term used for hydroelectric power generation of under 5 kW. It is useful in small, remote communities that require only a small amount of electricity. For example, to power one or two fluorescent light bulbs and a TV or radio for a few homes. Even smaller turbines of 200-300W may power a single home in a developing country with a drop of only 1 m (3 ft). A Pico-hydro setup is typically run-of-the-river, meaning that dams are not used, but rather pipes divert some of the flow, drop this down a gradient, and through the turbine before returning it to the stream.
An underground power station is generally used at large facilities and makes use of a large natural height difference between two waterways, such as a waterfall or mountain lake. An underground tunnel is constructed to take water from the high reservoir to the generating hall built in an underground cavern near the lowest point of the water tunnel and a horizontal tailrace taking water away to the lower outlet waterway.
Calculating available power
A simple formula for approximating electric power production at a hydroelectric station is: , where
- is Power in watts,
- is the density of water (~1000 kg/m3),
- is height in meters,
- is flow rate in cubic meters per second,
- is acceleration due to gravity of 9.8 m/s2,
- is a coefficient of efficiency ranging from 0 to 1. Efficiency is often higher (that is, closer to 1) with larger and more modern turbines.
Annual electric energy production depends on the available water supply. In some installations, the water flow rate can vary by a factor of 10:1 over the course of a year.
Advantages and disadvantages
Hydropower is a flexible source of electricity since stations can be ramped up and down very quickly to adapt to changing energy demands. Hydro turbines have a start-up time of the order of a few minutes. It takes around 60 to 90 seconds to bring a unit from cold start-up to full load; this is much shorter than for gas turbines or steam plants. Power generation can also be decreased quickly when there is a surplus power generation. Hence the limited capacity of hydropower units is not generally used to produce base power except for vacating the flood pool or meeting downstream needs. Instead, it serves as backup for non-hydro generators.
Low power costs
The major advantage of hydroelectricity is elimination of the cost of fuel. The cost of operating a hydroelectric station is nearly immune to increases in the cost of fossil fuels such as oil, natural gas or coal, and no imports are needed. The average cost of electricity from a hydro station larger than 10 megawatts is 3 to 5 U.S. cents per kilowatt-hour.
Hydroelectric stations have long economic lives, with some plants still in service after 50–100 years. Operating labor cost is also usually low, as plants are automated and have few personnel on site during normal operation.
Where a dam serves multiple purposes, a hydroelectric station may be added with relatively low construction cost, providing a useful revenue stream to offset the costs of dam operation. It has been calculated that the sale of electricity from the Three Gorges Dam will cover the construction costs after 5 to 8 years of full generation. Additionally, some data shows that in most countries large hydropower dams will be too costly and take too long to build to deliver a positive risk adjusted return, unless appropriate risk management measures are put in place.
Suitability for industrial applications
While many hydroelectric projects supply public electricity networks, some are created to serve specific industrial enterprises. Dedicated hydroelectric projects are often built to provide the substantial amounts of electricity needed for aluminium electrolytic plants, for example. The Grand Coulee Dam switched to support Alcoa aluminium in Bellingham, Washington, United States for American World War II airplanes before it was allowed to provide irrigation and power to citizens (in addition to aluminium power) after the war. In Suriname, the Brokopondo Reservoir was constructed to provide electricity for the Alcoa aluminium industry. New Zealand's Manapouri Power Station was constructed to supply electricity to the aluminium smelter at Tiwai Point.
Reduced CO2 emissions
Since hydroelectric dams do not burn fossil fuels, they do not directly produce carbon dioxide. While some carbon dioxide is produced during manufacture and construction of the project, this is a tiny fraction of the operating emissions of equivalent fossil-fuel electricity generation. One measurement of greenhouse gas related and other externality comparison between energy sources can be found in the ExternE project by the Paul Scherrer Institut and the University of Stuttgart which was funded by the European Commission. According to that study, hydroelectricity produces the least amount of greenhouse gases and externality of any energy source. Coming in second place was wind, third was nuclear energy, and fourth was solar photovoltaic. The low greenhouse gas impact of hydroelectricity is found especially in temperate climates. The above study was for local energy in Europe; presumably similar conditions prevail in North America and Northern Asia, which all see a regular, natural freeze/thaw cycle (with associated seasonal plant decay and regrowth). Greater greenhouse gas emission impacts are found in the tropical regions because the reservoirs of power stations in tropical regions produce a larger amount of methane than those in temperate areas.
Other uses of the reservoir
Reservoirs created by hydroelectric schemes often provide facilities for water sports, and become tourist attractions themselves. In some countries, aquaculture in reservoirs is common. Multi-use dams installed for irrigation support agriculture with a relatively constant water supply. Large hydro dams can control floods, which would otherwise affect people living downstream of the project.
Ecosystem damage and loss of land
Large reservoirs associated with traditional hydroelectric power stations result in submersion of extensive areas upstream of the dams, sometimes destroying biologically rich and productive lowland and riverine valley forests, marshland and grasslands. The loss of land is often exacerbated by habitat fragmentation of surrounding areas caused by the reservoir.
Hydroelectric projects can be disruptive to surrounding aquatic ecosystems both upstream and downstream of the plant site. Generation of hydroelectric power changes the downstream river environment. Water exiting a turbine usually contains very little suspended sediment, which can lead to scouring of river beds and loss of riverbanks. Since turbine gates are often opened intermittently, rapid or even daily fluctuations in river flow are observed.
Siltation and flow shortage
When water flows it has the ability to transport particles heavier than itself downstream. This has a negative effect on dams and subsequently their power stations, particularly those on rivers or within catchment areas with high siltation. Siltation can fill a reservoir and reduce its capacity to control floods along with causing additional horizontal pressure on the upstream portion of the dam. Eventually, some reservoirs can become full of sediment and useless or over-top during a flood and fail.
Changes in the amount of river flow will correlate with the amount of energy produced by a dam. Lower river flows will reduce the amount of live storage in a reservoir therefore reducing the amount of water that can be used for hydroelectricity. The result of diminished river flow can be power shortages in areas that depend heavily on hydroelectric power. The risk of flow shortage may increase as a result of climate change. One study from the Colorado River in the United States suggest that modest climate changes, such as an increase in temperature in 2 degree Celsius resulting in a 10% decline in precipitation, might reduce river run-off by up to 40%. Brazil in particular is vulnerable due to its heavy reliance on hydroelectricity, as increasing temperatures, lower water ﬂow and alterations in the rainfall regime, could reduce total energy production by 7% annually by the end of the century.
Methane emissions (from reservoirs)
Lower positive impacts are found in the tropical regions, as it has been noted that the reservoirs of power plants in tropical regions produce substantial amounts of methane. This is due to plant material in flooded areas decaying in an anaerobic environment, and forming methane, a greenhouse gas. According to the World Commission on Dams report, where the reservoir is large compared to the generating capacity (less than 100 watts per square metre of surface area) and no clearing of the forests in the area was undertaken prior to impoundment of the reservoir, greenhouse gas emissions from the reservoir may be higher than those of a conventional oil-fired thermal generation plant.
In boreal reservoirs of Canada and Northern Europe, however, greenhouse gas emissions are typically only 2% to 8% of any kind of conventional fossil-fuel thermal generation. A new class of underwater logging operation that targets drowned forests can mitigate the effect of forest decay.
Another disadvantage of hydroelectric dams is the need to relocate the people living where the reservoirs are planned. In 2000, the World Commission on Dams estimated that dams had physically displaced 40-80 million people worldwide.
Because large conventional dammed-hydro facilities hold back large volumes of water, a failure due to poor construction, natural disasters or sabotage can be catastrophic to downriver settlements and infrastructure. Dam failures have been some of the largest man-made disasters in history.
The Banqiao Dam failure in Southern China directly resulted in the deaths of 26,000 people, and another 145,000 from epidemics. Millions were left homeless. Also, the creation of a dam in a geologically inappropriate location may cause disasters such as 1963 disaster at Vajont Dam in Italy, where almost 2,000 people died.
Smaller dams and micro hydro facilities create less risk, but can form continuing hazards even after being decommissioned. For example, the small Kelly Barnes Dam failed in 1967, causing 39 deaths with the Toccoa Flood, ten years after its power station was decommissioned the earthen embankment dam failed.
Comparison with other methods of power generation
Hydroelectricity eliminates the flue gas emissions from fossil fuel combustion, including pollutants such as sulfur dioxide, nitric oxide, carbon monoxide, dust, and mercury in the coal. Hydroelectricity also avoids the hazards of coal mining and the indirect health effects of coal emissions. Compared to nuclear power, hydroelectricity construction requires altering large areas of the environment while a nuclear power station has a small footprint, and hydro-powerstation failures have caused tens of thousands of more deaths than any nuclear station failure. The creation of Garrison Dam, for example, required the seizure of Native American land to create Lake Sakakawea, which has a shoreline of 1,320 miles, and caused the inhabitants to lose 94% of their arable land.
Compared to wind farms, hydroelectricity power stations have a more predictable load factor. If the project has a storage reservoir, it can generate power when needed. Hydroelectric stations can be easily regulated to follow variations in power demand.
World hydroelectric capacity
The ranking of hydro-electric capacity is either by actual annual energy production or by installed capacity power rating. Hydro accounted for 16 percent of global electricity consumption, and 3,427 terawatt-hours of electricity production in 2010, which continues the rapid rate of increase experienced between 2003 and 2009.
Hydropower is produced in 150 countries, with the Asia-Pacific region generated 32 percent of global hydropower in 2010. China is the largest hydroelectricity producer, with 721 terawatt-hours of production in 2010, representing around 17 percent of domestic electricity use. Brazil, Canada, New Zealand, Norway, Paraguay, Austria, Switzerland, and Venezuela have a majority of the internal electric energy production from hydroelectric power. Paraguay produces 100% of its electricity from hydroelectric dams, and exports 90% of its production to Brazil and to Argentina. Norway produces 98–99% of its electricity from hydroelectric sources.
A hydro-electric station rarely operates at its full power rating over a full year; the ratio between annual average power and installed capacity rating is the capacity factor. The installed capacity is the sum of all generator nameplate power ratings.
| % of total
Major projects under construction
|Name||Maximum Capacity||Country||Construction started||Scheduled completion||Comments|
|Belo Monte Dam||11,181 MW||Brazil||March, 2011||2015||Preliminary construction underway.
Construction suspended 14 days by court order Aug 2012
|Siang Upper HE Project||11,000 MW||India||April, 2009||2024||Multi-phase construction over a period of 15 years. Construction was delayed due to dispute with China.|
|Tasang Dam||7,110 MW||Burma||March, 2007||2022||Controversial 228 meter tall dam with capacity to produce 35,446 GWh annually.|
|Xiangjiaba Dam||6,400 MW||China||November 26, 2006||2015||The last generator was commissioned on July 9, 2014|
|Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam||6,000 MW||Ethiopia||2011||2017||Located in the upper Nile Basin, drawing complaint from Egypt|
|Nuozhadu Dam||5,850 MW||China||2006||2017|
|Jinping 2 Hydropower Station||4,800 MW||China||January 30, 2007||2014||To build this dam, 23 families and 129 local residents need to be moved. It works with Jinping 1 Hydropower Station as a group.|
|Diamer-Bhasha Dam||4,500 MW||Pakistan||October 18, 2011||2023|
|Jinping 1 Hydropower Station||3,600 MW||China||November 11, 2005||2014||The sixth and final generator was commissioned on 15 July 2014|
|Jirau Power Station||3,300 MW||Brazil||2008||2013||Construction halted in March 2011 due to worker riots.|
|Guanyinyan Dam||3,000 MW||China||2008||2015||Construction of the roads and spillway started.|
|Lianghekou Dam||3,000 MW||China||2014||2023|
|Dagangshan Dam||2,600 MW||China||August 15, 2008||2016|
|Liyuan Dam||2,400 MW||China||2008||2013|
|Tocoma Dam Bolívar State||2,160 MW||Venezuela||2004||2014||This power station would be the last development in the Low Caroni Basin, bringing the total to six power stations on the same river, including the 10,000MW Guri Dam.|
|Ludila Dam||2,100 MW||China||2007||2015||Brief construction halt in 2009 for environmental assessment.|
|Shuangjiangkou Dam||2,000 MW||China||December, 2007||2018||The dam will be 312 m high.|
|Ahai Dam||2,000 MW||China||July 27, 2006||2015|
|Teles Pires Dam||1,820 MW||Brazil||2011||2015|
|Lower Subansiri Dam||2,000 MW||India||2007||2016|
- Hydraulic engineering
- International Rivers
- List of energy storage projects
- List of hydroelectric power station failures
- List of hydroelectric power stations
- List of largest power stations in the world
- Xcel Energy Cabin Creek Hydroelectric Plant Fire
- Worldwatch Institute (January 2012). "Use and Capacity of Global Hydropower Increases".<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- Renewables 2011 Global Status Report, page 25, Hydropower, REN21, published 2011, accessed 2016-02-19.
- National Museum Uzice.
- Hydroelectric power plants, ″Under the Town″ and ″Turica″
- "History of Hydropower". U.S. Department of Energy.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- "Hydroelectric Power". Water Encyclopedia.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- Association for Industrial Archaeology (1987). Industrial archaeology review, Volumes 10-11. Oxford University Press. p. 187.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- "Hydroelectric power - energy from falling water". Clara.net.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- "Boulder Canyon Project Act" (PDF). December 21, 1928.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- The Evolution of the Flood Control Act of 1936, Joseph L. Arnold, United States Army Corps of Engineers, 1988
- The Book of Knowledge. Vol. 9 (1945 ed.). p. 3220.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- "Hoover Dam and Lake Mead". U.S. Bureau of Reclamation.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- Hydro Electricity Explained
- Pumped Storage, Explained
- Run-of-the-River Hydropower Goes With the Flow
- Energy Resources: Tidal power
- Pope, Gregory T. (December 1995), "The seven wonders of the modern world", Popular Mechanics, pp. 48–56<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- Renewables Global Status Report 2006 Update, REN21, published 2006
- "Micro Hydro in the fight against poverty". Tve.org. Retrieved 2012-07-22.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- "Pico Hydro Power". T4cd.org. Retrieved 2010-07-16.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- Robert A. Huggins (1 September 2010). Energy Storage. Springer. p. 60. ISBN 978-1-4419-1023-3.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- Herbert Susskind; Chad J. Raseman (1970). Combined Hydroelectric Pumped Storage and Nuclear Power Generation. Brookhaven National Laboratory. p. 15.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- Bent Sørensen (2004). Renewable Energy: Its Physics, Engineering, Use, Environmental Impacts, Economy, and Planning Aspects. Academic Press. pp. 556–. ISBN 978-0-12-656153-1.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- Geological Survey (U.S.) (1980). Geological Survey Professional Paper. U.S. Government Printing Office. p. 10.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- Hydropower – A Way of Becoming Independent of Fossil Energy? Archived 28 May 2008 at the Wayback Machine
- "Beyond Three Gorges in China". Waterpowermagazine.com. 2007-01-10.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- (http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2406852), Should We Build More Large Dams? The Actual Costs of Hydropower Megaproject Development, Energy Policy, March 2014, pp. 1-14
- Rabl A. et. al. (August 2005). "Final Technical Report, Version 2" (PDF). Externalities of Energy: Extension of Accounting Framework and Policy Applications. European Commission.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- "External costs of electricity systems (graph format)". ExternE-Pol. Technology Assessment / GaBE (Paul Scherrer Institut). 2005.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- Atkins, William (2003). "Hydroelectric Power". Water: Science and Issues. 2: 187–191.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- Robbins, Paul (2007). "Hydropower". Encyclopedia of Environment and Society. 3.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- "Sedimentation Problems with Dams". Internationalrivers.org. Retrieved 2010-07-16.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- Patrick James, H Chansen (1998). "Teaching Case Studies in Reservoir Siltation and Catchment Erosion" (PDF). Great Britain: TEMPUS Publications. pp. 265–275.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- Șentürk, Fuat (1994). Hydraulics of dams and reservoirs (reference. ed.). Highlands Ranch, Colo.: Water Resources Publications. p. 375. ISBN 0-918334-80-2.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- Frauke Urban and Tom Mitchell 2011. Climate change, disasters and electricity generation. London: Overseas Development Institute and Institute of Development Studies
- "WCD Findal Report". Dams.org. 2000-11-16.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- "Hydroelectric power's dirty secret revealed". Newscientist.com.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- ""Rediscovered" Wood & The Triton Sawfish". Inhabitat. 2006-11-16.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- "Briefing of World Commission on Dams". Internationalrivers.org. 2008-02-29.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- References may be found in the list of Dam failures.
- http://ecolo.org/documents/documents_in_french/malpasset/malpasset.htm retrieved 02sep2015
- Toccoa Flood USGS Historical Site, retrieved 02sep2009
- Lawson, Michael L. (1982). Dammed Indians: the Pick-Sloan Plan and the Missouri River Sioux, 1944–1980. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
- "Binge and purge". The Economist. 2009-01-22. Retrieved 2009-01-30.
98-99% of Norway’s electricity comes from hydroelectric plants.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- Consumption BP.com[dead link]
- "Indicators 2009, National Electric Power Industry". Chinese Government. Retrieved 18 July 2010.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- "Belo Monte hydroelectric dam construction work begins". Guardian UK. 10 March 2011. Retrieved 2 April 2011.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- "Belo Monte dam construction halted by Brazilian court". Guardian UK. 16 August 2012. Retrieved 24 August 2012.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- "Upper Siang project likely to be relocated on Chinese concerns". Thehindubusinessline.com. 2006-03-24. Retrieved 2012-07-22.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- "Brazil Sends Forces to Jirau Dam After Riots". Wall Street Journal. 18 March 2011. Retrieved 2 April 2011.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- "二滩水电开发有限责任公司". Ehdc.com.cn. 2009-04-25. Retrieved 2012-07-22.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- "陆良县人口和计划生育局". Zt.xxgk.yn.gov.cn. Retrieved 2012-07-22.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- Staff (2004). "Caroní River Watershed Management Plan" (PDF). Inter-America Development Bank. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 28, 2008. Retrieved 2008-10-25.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- CJWSJY.com.cn Archived June 29, 2010 at the Wayback Machine
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to Hydroelectricity.|
- International Hydropower Association
- Hydroelectricity at DMOZ
- National Hydropower Association, USA
- Hydropower Reform Coalition
- Interactive demonstration on the effects of dams on rivers
- European Small Hydropower Association
- IEC TC 4: Hydraulic turbines (International Electrotechnical Commission - Technical Committee 4) IEC TC 4 portal with access to scope, documents and TC 4 website