Accession of Iceland to the European Union

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search
Icelandic EU accession bid
200px
250px
Status Application frozen
Opened chapters 27
Closed chapters 11
Website eu.mfa.is
Statistics
EU average Iceland
PPP GDP ($M) 552,780 12,664
Area (km2) 165,048 103,001
Population 18,583,598 319,756

Accession of Iceland to the European Union is a contentious political issue in Iceland. Iceland applied to join the European Union on 16 July 2009 and formal negotiations began on 27 July 2010.[1] However, on 13 September 2013 the Government of Iceland dissolved its accession team and suspended its application to join the EU. On 12 March 2015, Foreign Minister of Iceland Gunnar Bragi Sveinsson stated that he had sent a letter to the EU withdrawing the application for membership, without the approval of the Althing, though the European Union stated that Iceland had not formally withdrawn the application.[2]

If negotiations were to resume, Iceland would face contentious issues on fisheries which could potentially derail an agreement, despite already being a member of the European Economic Area[3] (which excludes fishery). If an agreement were to be concluded, the accession treaty would be subject to a national referendum in Iceland and require ratification by every EU state.[4]

European relationships

Iceland is a member of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA), a grouping of four non-EU European countries, and is also part of the European Economic Area (EEA). Through the EEA, Iceland participates with a non-voting status in certain EU agencies and programmes, including enterprise, environment, education (including the Erasmus Programme[5]) and research programs. Iceland also contributes funds to "social and economic cohesion" in the EU/EEA.[6] Iceland also frequently consults the EU on foreign affairs and frequently aligns itself to EU foreign policy. Iceland also participates in EU civilian peacekeeping missions.[5]

Iceland is a member of the Nordic Passport Union[6] and the Schengen Area, which now is under EU law, as a non-voting participant. Iceland's participation in the Schengen Area allows free movement of people between Iceland and the rest of the Schengen Area. Several thousand Icelanders travel to and study or work in the EU. A large majority of foreigners in Iceland come from the EU.[5] Iceland is also associated with the Dublin Convention on justice and home affairs cooperation. Iceland also has links to several EU member states through its membership of the Nordic Council.

Trade relations

In fisheries, the most important sector of the Icelandic economy, Iceland has a €879 million trade surplus with the EU.

Economic relations between Iceland and the European Union are primarily governed by two agreements: a bilateral free trade agreement signed in 1972, and the agreement on the EEA in 1994. The EEA was established to give Iceland, among other European countries outside the EU, access to the EU market. Iceland's access to the EU market excludes agriculture and fisheries, which are dealt with by separate bilateral agreements. Iceland is legally bound to implement into its own law all EU directives applicable to the free movement of goods, persons, services and capital. This is complemented by regular meetings between EU and Icelandic officials, including a twice-yearly meeting of EEA foreign ministers.[6][7]

Icelandic-European trade[7]
Direction of trade Goods (2009) Services (2008) Investment (2008)
EU to Iceland €1.34 billion €502 million €3.2 billion
Iceland to EU €2.17 billion €620 million €6.5 billion

78% of Iceland's exports went to the EU and 52% of Iceland's imports came from it, making the EU Iceland's most important trading partner, followed by Norway. Traditionally, Iceland's economy has focused on fisheries and renewable energy, but it has been diversifying into aluminium production, pharmaceuticals, information technologies, tourism and the financial sector. Iceland is still a large exporter of fish (the third largest exporter to the EU after Norway and China) with a world trade surplus of €1.1 billion in 2008. In fisheries, the EU had a 2009 trade deficit of €879 million. Until Iceland's 2009 financial crisis, its commercial services sector had been growing rapidly, accounting for almost 35% of total exports (goods and services combined).[7]

Development

Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

Pre-2008 opinion

From 1995 to 2007 the government coalition of the conservative Independence Party (Sjálfstæðisflokkurinn) and the liberal Progressive Party (Framsóknarflokkurinn), opposed joining the EU, while the opposition Social Democratic Alliance (Samfylkingin) supported membership negotiations. In 1994, the Social Democratic Party (Alþýðuflokkurinn) became the first Icelandic political party to include the intention to apply to join the EU in its policy statement.[8]

Former Prime Minister Halldór Ásgrímsson predicted on 8 February 2006 that the country would join the EU by 2015. He added that the decisive factor would be the future and the size of the Eurozone, especially whether Denmark, Sweden and the UK would have adopted the euro or not.[9] His prediction received some criticism, not the least from people within his own government.[10]

Another former Prime Minister, Geir H. Haarde, has on a number of occasions stated his opposition to EU membership, both as Foreign Minister under Halldór Ásgrímsson and after taking office as Prime Minister. In response to Halldór Ásgrímsson's earlier prediction, Haarde said, "I don't share that point of view. Our policy is not to join in the foreseeable future. We are not even exploring membership." In a speech at a conference at the University of Iceland on 31 March 2006, Geir Haarde repeated what he had said on a number of occasions—that no special Icelandic interests demanded membership of the EU. In the same speech he further explained in detail why it would not be in the interest of Iceland to adopt the euro.[11]

Following the 2007 election, the Independence Party and the Social Democratic Alliance formed a new coalition with a policy of not applying for membership, but setting up a special committee to monitor the development within the EU and suggest ways to respond to that.[12]

Due to Iceland's limited currency[clarification needed], the government has explored the possibility of adopting the euro without joining the European Union. The EU, however, says that Iceland cannot join the Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) without becoming a full EU member state (all other non-EU states that use the euro do so because they previously used a member state currency that was replaced by the euro).

Effect of 2008 financial crisis

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

At a meeting of members of his party on 17 May 2008, Geir Haarde said that in his opinion the cost of joining the EU outweighed the benefits, and therefore he was not in favour of membership.[13] However, in October 2008, during talks to repatriate a portion of Iceland's foreign invested pension funds—Iceland having been particularly hard hit by the financial crisis of September 2008—the unions demanded that Iceland apply for EU membership in return for wage restraint.[14]

On 30 October 2008, Þorgerður Katrín Gunnarsdóttir, minister of education, said that "Iceland has to define its long-term national interests and part of that is a revision of the currency regime, including a possible EU application" and that an application for membership needed to be discussed "in weeks rather than months".[15]

Two weeks later, on 17 November 2008, the Independence Party announced it would hold its party congress in January 2009 instead of Autumn 2009, to reconsider the possibility of applying for EU membership; the Progressive Party also announced it would hold its party congress in January, after two anti-EU MPs (including the party leader) resigned and were replaced by MPs more positive towards EU application.[16]

The Progressive Party accepted at its congress to support application for EU membership but with very strict conditions including one demanding full authority for Iceland over its fishing grounds and other national resources.[17] When the government headed by the Independence Party was dissolved in January the party decided to postpone its congress until March. The congress eventually decided on an unchanged opposition to EU membership but also claimed that if the issue were opened by others both an application and an initial accession treaty with the EU should be put to a referendum.[18]

2009 election and parliamentary debate

Iceland's finance minister, Steingrimur Sigfusson, ahead of the country's first elections since the financial crisis, stated that "any decision for Iceland to join the European Union and the single currency must be taken by its people, not one political party", on the subject that the issue of EU membership was the greatest threat to a stable coalition.[19]

The 2009 election, which followed the financial crisis, saw the Progressive Party switch to supporting EU membership but the Independence Party called for a referendum prior to the start of negotiations.[20][21][22] The Social Democratic Alliance made joining the EU a key issue in their campaign.[23]

After the win of the pro-EU Social Democratic Alliance in the election, Prime Minister Jóhanna Sigurðardóttir spoke of an immediate application to the European Union and adoption of the euro within four years as a way to deal with the country's debt.[24]

In late April 2009, it was announced that the United Kingdom, a member state of the European Union with whom Iceland has had a long history of fishing and territorial water disputes, supported Iceland joining the EU.[25]

In early May 2009, it was leaked that the issue of application for EU membership would likely be left to the parliament, in which the Alliance, the Progressive Party and the Citizens' Movement together already had enough seats to approve the application.[26] Sigmundur Davíð Gunnlaugsson, the leader of the Progressive Party, strongly objected to the suggestion that his party would assist the government in this matter, however.[27] The anti-EU Left-Green coalition partner accepted that in spring 2010, the minister for foreign affairs would present to the parliament a bill on talks with the EU.[28]

On 10 May 2009, Prime Minister Jóhanna Sigurðardóttir announced that the government intended to move towards membership more quickly than previously expected. She announced that a bill would be introduced in parliament on 15 May 2009, authorising the opening of accession talks with the EU. She also stated that she was confident that the legislation would pass, and that she had secured a parliamentary majority on the issue, despite the official opposition to talks by one of her coalition partners. She went on to say that she expected an official application to be submitted no later than July 2009. This seemed to leave Iceland on course to join the EU along with Croatia in 2011, as predicted by EU Enlargement Commissioner, Olli Rehn. The government has stated that the issue will be put to a vote once an accession agreement has been negotiated.[29]

The motion to file an application for membership was officially introduced in parliament on 25 May 2009.[30][31] Voting was to have been held on 13 July, but was postponed until 16 July.[32][33][34] First, a proposal by the Independence Party to hold a referendum on the membership application was defeated by 32 to 30 with one abstention. Then the Social Democratic Alliance's proposal to apply for membership immediately was approved with a narrow majority of 33 to 28 votes with 2 abstentions.[35]

Application for membership

File:Iceland keflavik exit.jpg
Though Iceland is not in the EU, it is a member of the Schengen area

To become a member, a country must first apply and then be recognised as a candidate country. For that to happen the country must satisfy the first of the Copenhagen criteria: it must be a politically stable democracy that respects human rights. Then negotiations will take place which will consider the country's fulfilment of economic criteria, the country's degree of adoption of EU legislation, and whether there shall be any exceptions.

EU Enlargement Commissioner Olli Rehn has claimed that negotiations on an accession treaty would take less than a year, because Iceland has already adopted two-thirds of EU legislation[36] in relation to the EEA.[37] He has on other occasions claimed that the negotiations could take up to four years.[38]

On 30 January 2009 Rehn commented that Iceland could enter the European Union promptly in 2011, at the same time as Croatia, saying that Iceland is an old democracy but also that it should not get special treatment. Fishing quotas and Icelandic whaling may be the toughest issues in any such negotiations.[39]

On 16 July 2009 the Althing voted in favour of accession talks with the EU (with 33 votes in favour, 28 against, and 2 abstentions).[40] The head of the parliamentary committee on EU affairs, Árni Þór Sigurðsson, has stated that Iceland will not be ready to join the EU any earlier than 2013.[41] However the government stated that it planned to complete negotiations by the end of 2010.[42]

On 17 July 2009 the application for Icelandic membership of the EU was handed to the government of Sweden, which then held the presidency of the Council of the European Union, by the ambassador of Iceland in Stockholm.[43] The application was again handed over by the Icelandic foreign minister to the Swedish one in a ceremony in Stockholm on 23 July 2009.[44]

The letter of application was dated 16 July 2009.[45] The application was acknowledged by the Council of the European Union on 27 July 2009.[46]

Accession negotiations

Sweden, then holder of the EU presidency, announced that it would prioritise Iceland's EU accession process.[47] On 24 July, the Lithuanian Parliament unanimously approved and gave full support for Iceland’s membership application to join the European Union.[48] Later, on 27 July, Malta also announced that it supports Iceland's EU bid.[49]

In September 2009, the Spanish foreign minister visited Iceland to discuss the progress of the Icelandic application; Spain chaired the EU from January–June 2010. On 8 September, the EU commission sent a list of 2,500 questions to Iceland about its fulfilment of political and economic criteria and adoption of EU law. Iceland returned answers to them on 22 October 2009.[50] On 2 November, Iceland selected a chief negotiator for the membership negotiations with the EU: Stefán Haukur Jóhannesson, Iceland's Ambassador to Belgium.[51]

In January 2010 the Icesave dispute became an issue. The United Kingdom and the Netherlands want the Icelandic government to repay them the costs incurred in covering their citizens' losses due to the bankruptcy of some Icelandic banks. If Iceland does not pay, obstacles to membership could be laid by the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. If Iceland agrees to repay the UK and the Netherlands, the added debt will make it difficult to adopt the euro, a major reason for Iceland to join the EU, because of the convergence criteria. Spanish Foreign Minister Miguel Ángel Moratinos, who then held the Presidency of the European Union, has said that the Icesave dispute does not impact Iceland's application.[52] David Miliband, then British Foreign Minister, reaffirmed the UK's continued support for Iceland's EU application.[52] Additionally, the Dutch Foreign Minister has stated that while the opening of negotiations will not be blocked by the Icesave dispute, it must be resolved before Iceland's accession.[53]

In February 2010, the European Commissioner for Enlargement and European Neighbourhood Policy recommended to the Council of the European Union to start accession negotiations with Iceland.[54] While it was expected that Iceland would be considered for official candidate status at the EU summit in March, this was delayed to allow the German national parliament, which has the authority to debate important EU policy such as enlargement before action is taken by the government, to consider the matter.[55] The German Parliament voted in favour of opening membership negotiations on 22 April 2010.[56] The European Council decided in June to begin negotiations,[57] and on 17 June 2010, the EU granted official candidate status to Iceland by formally approving the opening of membership talks.[58]

Negotiations for membership of the EU started on 27 July 2010,[59] with screening of specific acquis chapters beginning on 15 November 2010.[60] Iceland became eligible for pre-accession funding from the EU through the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA) since July 2010.[61]

The first annual report on negotiations was published in November 2010:[62] the main issues at stake remain the fisheries sector and whale hunting, while progress has been made concerning the Icesave dispute.[63]

The screening process ended and formal negotiations began on 27 June 2011. Four chapters were opened: science and research; education and culture; public procurement; information society and media. The first two were immediately closed, a first in accession history. Iceland aimed to open half of the remaining chapters under the Polish presidency (the second half of 2011) and the other half under the following Danish presidency (first half of 2012). Despite disputes over Icesave and fishing, and the fact there was then no majority in favour of membership in Iceland, Icelandic Foreign Minister Össur Skarphéðinsson was confident Iceland would join and looked to the EU's flexibility in negotiations with Norway during the 1990s as hope. He did however claim that ultimately it was the major fishing countries of the EU who would influence the outcome of the application.[3]

2013 election and withdrawal of application

The Icelandic Parliamentary committee on foreign affairs tabled a proposal on 18 December 2012 to suspend accession negotiations. The motion also calls for an "application referendum" to be held to determine the will of the Icelandic people prior to any resumption of negotiations.[64] A similar proposal was submitted to the Icelandic parliament in May 2012, but was rejected by a vote of 25 for and 34 against.[65] The Icelandic parliament had yet to vote on the new proposal, which were supported primarily at the time by the opposition Independence Party and Progressive Party.[66] The leaders of both governing parties, the Social Democratic Alliance and Left-Green Movement, stated that they did not support the motion.[67] However, some MPs from the Left-Green Movement declared their support for the measure.[68] On 10 January 2013, the proposal was formally adopted by the Foreign Affairs committee.[69]

On 14 January, the Icelandic government announced that negotiations would be slowed, and that an accession agreement would not be reached before the parliamentary election in April.[70] No new chapters will be opened prior to the election, though negotiations will continue on chapters that have already been opened.[71] In February 2013, the national congress of both the Independence Party and Progressive Party reconfirmed their policy that further membership negotiations with the EU should be stopped and not resumed unless they are first approved by a national referendum,[72][73] while the national congresses of the Social Democratic Alliance, Bright Future and Left-Green Movement reiterated their support for the completion of EU accession negotiations.[74]

On 19 March 2013, Þorgerður Katrín Gunnarsdóttir, an Independence Party MP, put forward a motion in the Althing calling for a referendum asking the Icelandic public whether EU accession negotiations should continue. She proposed that the referendum be held during the upcoming parliamentary election in April if possible, or else during local elections in the spring of 2014.[75] In response to Gunnarsdóttir and other proponents of EU integration within the Independence Party, Bjarni Benediktsson, the leader of the party, reiterated the party's policy of stopping negotiations with the EU, but promised to hold a referendum on continuing the negotiations in the first half of their term if they form government.[76][77][78]

The ruling left-wing parties suffered a major defeat in the parliamentary elections that were held on 27 April 2013, while the centrist Progressive Party had a large victory. The leaders of the Progressive Party and the Independence Party began negotiating the formation of a coalition government, and on 22 May it was announced that a coalition platform had been agreed to that would suspend all accession talks with the EU and not resume them unless approved by a referendum.[79] However, under Icelandic law, it is not the Government but the Icelandic Parliament which decides to end negotiations.[80] On 13 June, Iceland's Foreign Minister Gunnar Bragi Sveinsson informed the European Commission that the newly elected government intended to "put negotiations on hold".[81] European Commission President Manuel Barroso responded on 16 July 2013 by requesting that the new Icelandic Prime Minister make a decision on the continuation of their accession bid "without further delay", and stressed that the EU remained "committed to continue the accession negotiations process, which I’m certain could address Iceland’s specificities.”[82]

In August 2013 the Icelandic government revealed that it had received a legal opinion that the 2009 Parliamentary vote did not oblige it to continue accession negotiations with the EU. In light of this, the Foreign Ministry stated that it had "decided to consider dissolving the negotiation committee."[83] A few weeks later the committee was officially dissolved. Foreign Minister Gunnar Bragi Sveinsson said that "the process has been suspended. But nothing has been closed down."[84] In October 2013 Benediktsson stated that no decision on ending Iceland's membership bid would be made until a report being prepared by the government on negotiations and "the recent changes within the union" was completed, expected to be by the end of 2013. Benediktsson went on to say that "we will see if a proposal will be put before the parliament or not."[85] On 12 March 2015, Foreign Minister of Iceland Gunnar Bragi Sveinsson stated that he had sent a letter to the EU withdrawing the application for membership, without the approval of the Althing, though the European Union stated that Iceland had not formally withdrawn the application.[86][87]

Public opinion

A poll released in January 2014 found that 67.5% of Icelanders support holding a referendum on the continuation of accession negotiations.[88] On 22 February, the governing parties agreed to formally withdraw the membership application, without first holding a referendum on the matter, and submitted a bill to parliament seeking their approval to do so.[89][90] The decision led to thousands of protesters taking to the streets outside of the Parliament buildings in Reykjavík.[91][92][93] By 28 February 82% were in favour of holding the referendum.[94] More than 40,000 people (16.5% of Iceland's voters) have signed a petition demanding that the promised referendum be held.[93][95] On 25 February, Ragnheiður Ríkharðsdóttir, Chairman of the parliamentary group of the Independence Party, announced her intention to not vote in favour of the proposal.[96] In early March, the EU ambassador to Iceland said that the country could keep its application suspended rather than having to decide between resuming negotiations or formally withdrawing the application, "but of course not for an unlimited period of time".[97] The bill was not approved before parliament's summer recess.[98]

Political parties' stances

2009–2013

Group Party Position Main argument as stated on party websites
Government Social Democratic Alliance Yes "We want to apply for an EU-membership and start negotiations. We will seek a national unity in this matter and use the national referendum as the highest court."[99]
Left-Green Movement No "EU-membership would diminish the independence of Iceland even more than the EEA Agreement does and jeopardise Iceland's control over its resources."[100]
Opposition Independence Party No "The Independence Party puts forth the clear demand that the application for Iceland's membership of the European Union will be withdrawn without delay."[101]
Progressive Party No "The Progressive Party believes the interests of the country and the nation are best secured outside the EU."[102]
The Movement Neutral No specific policy on EU accession[103]
No seats in the parliament Citizens' Movement Yes "Continue negotiations with the EU and keep agreements for a referendum after a thorough and impartial presentation of the advantages and disadvantages of membership."[104]
Liberal Party No EU stance was decided in a party members' poll in January 2009.[105]
Best Party Neutral No specific stance on EU membership.

2013–present

Group Party Position Main argument as stated on party websites
Government Progressive Party No "The Progressive Party believes the interests of the country and the nation are best secured outside the EU."[102]
Independence Party No "The Independence Party puts forth the clear demand that the application for Iceland's membership of the European Union will be withdrawn without delay."[101]
Opposition Social Democratic Alliance Yes "We want to apply for an EU-membership and start negotiations. We will seek a national unity in this matter and use the national referendum as the highest court."[99]
Left-Green Movement No "EU-membership would diminish the independence of Iceland even more than the EEA Agreement does and jeopardise Iceland's control over its resources."[100]
Bright Future Yes Supports the continuation of accession negotiations and a referendum on joining the EU.[106]
Pirate Party Iceland Neutral The party concludes that it should not be up to politicians to decide whether Iceland joins the European Union but to the general population after transparent and informative accession talks.[107]

Use of the euro

During the 2008–2011 Icelandic financial crisis, instability in the Icelandic króna led to discussion in Iceland about adopting the euro. However, Jürgen Stark, a Member of the Executive Board of the European Central Bank, has stated that "Iceland would not be able to adopt the EU currency without first becoming a member of the EU".[108] As of the ECB's May 2012 convergence report, Iceland did not meet any of the convergence criteria.[109] One year later, the country managed to comply with the deficit criteria and had begun to decrease their debt-to-GDP ratio,[110] but still suffered from elevated HICP inflation and long-term governmental interest rates.[111][112]

Timeline

EU affiliation ahead of membership application
EU membership application and the preparational phase
  • 2009-07-17: Iceland submits EU membership application.[113]
  • 2009-09-08: European Commission presents legislative questionnaire to Iceland.
  • 2009-10-22: Iceland responds to questionnaire.
  • 2010-02-24: European Commission recommended that the Council open accession negotiations with Iceland.[113]
  • 2010-06-17: Iceland officially recognised as an accession candidate by the European Council.[113]
  • 2010-07-26: The Council approved the framework for accession negotiations with Iceland.[113]
  • 2010-07-27: Preparational phase of the membership negotiation process starts (Accession Conference nr.1).[113]
  • 2010-11-15: Screening process started.
  • 2011-06-21: Screening process ended.[114]
EU membership negotiations
  • 2011-06-27: Accession Conference nr.2.[113] Real negotiations started with the first four chapters being opened, of which two were completed and closed on the same day.[115][116]
  • 2011-10-19: Accession Conference nr.3.[113] Two chapters were opened and closed immediately. In total 6 out of 33 chapters have now been opened (of which 4 have been closed).[117]
  • 2011-12-12: Accession Conference nr.4.[113] Five chapters were opened, four were closed immediately. In total 11 out of 33 chapters have now been opened (of which 8 have been closed).[118]
  • 2012-03-30: Accession Conference nr.5.[113] Four chapters were opened and two chapters were closed. In total 15 out of 33 chapters have now been opened (of which 10 have been closed).[119]
  • 2012-05-24: Proposal for a national referendum on discontinuing accession talks with the European Union rejected with 34 votes against and 25 in favour.[65]
  • 2012-06-22: Accession Conference nr.6.[113] Three new chapters opened. In total 18 out of 33 chapters have now been opened (of which 10 have been closed).[120][121]
  • 2012-10-24: Accession Conference nr.7.[113] Three new chapters opened. In total 21 out of 33 chapters have now been opened (of which 10 have been closed).[122]
  • 2012-12-18: Accession Conference nr.8.[113] Six new chapters opened and one more chapter closed. In total 27 out of 33 chapters have now been opened (of which 11 have been closed).[123]

Negotiation progress

Acquis chapter EC assessment at start Screening started Screening completed Chapter opened Chapter closed
1. Free movement of goods No major difficulties expected 2010-12-07 2010-12-08[124] 2012-12-18[125]
2. Freedom of movement for workers Generally already applies the acquis 2011-02-09 2011-02-09[126] 2011-10-19[117] 2011-10-19[117]
3. Right of establishment & freedom to provide services Further efforts needed 2010-12-09 2010-12-09
4. Free movement of capital Considerable efforts needed 2010-12-10 2010-12-10
5. Public procurement No major difficulties expected 2010-11-15 2010-11-15[127] 2011-06-27[128]
6. Company law No major difficulties expected 2010-11-16 2010-11-16[129] 2011-12-12[130] 2011-12-12[130]
7. Intellectual property law Generally already applies the acquis 2010-12-20 2010-12-20[131] 2011-10-19[117] 2011-10-19[117]
8. Competition policy Generally already applies the acquis 2010-12-06 2010-12-06[132] 2012-03-30[133] 2012-12-18[125]
9. Financial services Generally already applies the acquis 2010-11-18 2010-12-15[134] 2012-10-24[135]
10. Information society & media Generally already applies the acquis 2010-11-17 2010-11-17[136] 2011-06-27[128]
11. Agriculture & rural development Considerable efforts needed 2010-11-30 2011-01-27[137]
12. Food safety, veterinary & phytosanitary policy Further efforts needed 2011-02-14 2011-03-31[138]
13. Fisheries Considerable efforts needed 2010-12-16 2011-03-02[139]
14. Transport policy Further efforts needed 2011-05-04 2011-06-09 2012-06-22[120]
15. Energy No major difficulties expected 2011-05-12 2011-06-20[140] 2012-03-30[133]
16. Taxation Considerable efforts needed 2011-02-03 2011-03-04[141] 2012-12-18[125]
17. Economic & monetary policy Considerable efforts needed 2011-03-17 2011-05-17[142] 2012-12-18[125]
18. Statistics Considerable efforts needed 2011-05-02 2011-06-07 2012-10-24[135]
19. Social policy & employment No major difficulties expected 2011-02-07 2011-03-16[143] 2012-06-22[120]
20. Enterprise & industrial policy Generally already applies the acquis 2011-04-12 2011-05-25[144] 2011-12-12[130] 2011-12-12[130]
21. Trans-European networks Generally already applies the acquis 2011-05-06 2011-06-10 2011-12-12[130] 2011-12-12[130]
22. Regional policy & coordination of structural instruments No major difficulties expected 2011-01-31 2011-02-22[145] 2012-12-18[125]
23. Judiciary & fundamental rights Generally already applies the acquis 2011-01-11 2011-02-11[146] 2011-12-12[130] 2011-12-12[130]
24. Justice, freedom & security Further efforts needed 2011-04-14 2011-05-24
25. Science & research Generally already applies the acquis 2010-11-25 2011-01-14[147] 2011-06-27 2011-06-27[128]
26. Education & culture Generally already applies the acquis 2010-11-26 2011-01-14[148] 2011-06-27 2011-06-27[128]
27. Environment Further efforts needed 2010-11-22 2011-01-19[149] 2012-12-18[125]
28. Consumer & health protection No major difficulties expected 2011-04-11 2011-05-16[150] 2012-03-30[133] 2012-03-30[133]
29. Customs union Further efforts needed 2011-03-08 2011-04-06[151] 2012-10-24[135]
30. External relations No major difficulties expected 2011-04-08 2011-05-19[152] 2012-12-18[125]
31. Foreign, security & defence policy No major difficulties expected 2011-04-07 2011-05-20 2012-03-30[133] 2012-03-30[133]
32. Financial control Considerable efforts needed 2010-11-29 2011-02-02 2012-06-22[120]
33. Financial & budgetary provisions No major difficulties expected 2011-03-07 2011-04-04[153] 2011-12-12[130]
34. Institutions Nothing to adopt
35. Other issues Nothing to adopt
Progress 33 out of 33[154] 33 out of 33[154] 27 out of 33 11 out of 33

The screening is a series of meetings between the commission and the applicant country examining the level of fulfilment of the EU acquis. It allows candidate countries to familiarise themselves with the acquis and it allows the Commission and the member States to evaluate the degree of preparedness of candidate countries prior to negotiations.

Public opinion

Various polls have been taken on the public opinion of starting accession negotiations, joining the EU or adopting the euro.

Date Poller Question Yes No Unsure
August 2005 Capacent-Gallup for The Federation of Icelandic Industries[155] Start negotiations 55% 37% 8%
Join 43% 37% 20%
Adopt Euro 37% 54% 9%
February 2006 Fréttablaðið[156] Join 34% 42% 24%
September 2007 Capacent-Gallup[157] Start negotiations 59% 26% 15%
Join 48% 34% 18%
Adopt Euro 53% 37% 10%
February 2008 Fréttablaðið[158] Join 55.1% 44.9%
More reasons than last year 54.7% 7.3% 38.1%
18 October 2008 Capacent Gallup [159] Referendum on application 70% 17.5% 12.5%
24 November 2008 Fréttablaðið[160] Submit application 60% 40%
January 2009 Capacent Gallup[161] Join 38% 38% 24%
26 January 2009 Fréttablaðið[162] Submit application 40% 60%
March 2009 [163] Start negotiations 64% 28% 8%
11 April 2009 Fréttablaðið[164] Submit application 45.6% 54.4% 0%
5 May 2009 Capacent Gallup[165] Start negotiations 61% 27% 12%
Join 39% 39% 22%
10 June 2009 Capacent Gallup [166] Referendum on application 76.3% 17.8% 5.8%
30 July 2009 Fréttablaðið[167] Start negotiations 51% 36% 13%
4 August 2009 Capacent Gallup [168] Join 34.7% 48.5% 16.9%
15 September 2009 Capacent Gallup [169] Join 32.7% 50.2% 17%
If referendum now, how would you vote[170] 38.5% 61.5% 0%
Happy with application? 39.6% 43.2% 17.1%
5 November 2009 Bifröst University Research Institute[171][172] Join 29.0% 54% 17%
Start negotiations 50.5% 42.5% 7%
28 February 2010 Capacent Gallup[173] Join 33.3% 55.9% 10.8%
5 March 2010 Capacent Gallup[174] Join 24.4% 60% 15.5%
If referendum now, how would you vote 30.5% 69.4% 0%
14 June 2010 MMR[175] Maintain EU application 24.3% 57.6% 18.1%
6 July 2010 Capacent Gallup[176] Join 26% 60% 14%
2 September 2010 Capacent Gallup[177] Start negotiations 38.8% 45.5% 15.7%
29 September 2010 Fréttablaðið[178] Continue with negotiations 64.2% 32.8% 3%
24 January 2011 Fréttablaðið[179] Continue with negotiations 65.4% 34.6% 0%
10 March 2011 Capacent Gallup[180] Join 31.4% 50.5% 18%
If referendum now, how would you vote 38.9% 61.1% 0%
17 March 2011 MMR[181] Join 30% 55.7% 14.2%
16 June 2011 Capacent Gallup[182] Join 37.3% 50.1% 12.6%
30 June 2011 Capacent Gallup[183] Maintain EU application 38.5% 51.0% 10.5%
11 August 2011 Capacent Gallup[184] Join 35.5% 64.5% 0%
12 September 2011 Fréttablaðið[185] Continue with negotiations 63.4% 36.6% 0%
16 November 2011 MMR[186] Maintain EU application 35.3% 50.5% 14.2%
17 November 2011 Capacent Gallup[187] Continue with negotiations 53.1% 46.9% 0%
12 December 2011 Fréttablaðið[188] Continue with negotiations 65.3% 34.7% 0%
19 January 2012 Capacent Gallup[189] Join 31.5% 53.5% 15%
19 January 2012 MMR[190] Adopt Euro 28% 52% 20%
22 February 2012 Capacent Gallup[191] Join 26.3% 56.2% 17.5%
If referendum now, how would you vote 32.6% 67.4% 0%
Maintain EU application 42.6% 43.6% 13.9%
27 April 2012 University of Iceland[192] Join 27.5% 53.8% 18.7%
15 October 2012 Capacent Gallup[193] Join 27.3% 57.6% 15.0%
12 November 2012 Capacent Gallup[194] Maintain EU application 36.4% 53.5% 9.9%
18 January 2013 Fréttablaðið[195] Continue with negotiations 48.5% 36.4% 15%
13 February 2013 MMR[196] Join 24.2% 63.3% 12.5%
6 March 2013 Capacent Gallup[197] Join 25.1% 58.5% 16.5%
If referendum now, how would you vote 30% 70% 0%
Maintain EU application 43.5% 44.6% 11.9%
15 March 2013 Capacent Gallup[198] Continue and complete negotiations 54% 35% 11%
23 April 2013 University of Iceland[199] Join 27.6% 52.2% 20.2%
Continue with negotiations 52.7% 30.7% 16.5%
5 March 2014 Capacent Gallup[200] Join 37% 47% 16%
Hold referendum on continuing negotiations 72% 21% 7%

Comparison with EU countries

If Iceland were admitted to the EU, it would be the smallest member state in terms of population. Its area (103,000 km2) is close to the average for EU countries (165,048 km2), but it would be the least densely populated country in the EU. The table below shows its population and population density in comparison to some of the other member states.

Population figures Population density
EU rank Country Population EU rank Country Population Area (km2) Density
Iceland Iceland 319,756 Iceland Iceland 319,756 103,001 3.1
28 Malta Malta 416,333 28 Finland Finland 5,350,475 338,145 15.82
27 Luxembourg Luxembourg 502,207 27 Sweden Sweden 9,347,899 449,964 20.77
26 Cyprus Cyprus 801,851 26 Estonia Estonia 1,340,274 45,226 29.64
14 Hungary Hungary (EU median) 10,013,628 14 Portugal Portugal (EU median) 11,317,192 92,391 109
European Union EU Average 18,565,179 European Union EU Average 18,565,179 160,177 115.9
2 France France 64,709,480 2 Netherlands Netherlands 16,576,800 41,526 399.2
1 Germany Germany 81,757,595 1 Malta Malta 416,333 316 1317.5

Iceland’s GDP per capita is among the highest in Europe as is shown in the following tables:[201]

EU Ranking Country GDP per capita (PPP)
1 Luxembourg Luxembourg $80,559
2 Netherlands Netherlands $42,023
3 Austria Austria $41,556
4 Republic of Ireland Ireland $40,838
5 Sweden Sweden $40,705
6 Germany Germany $38,077
Iceland Iceland $38,060
European Union EU Average $31,673
28 Romania Romania $12,493

The Icelandic language would also be one of the smallest official languages of the EU in terms of native speakers (together with Irish and Maltese).

Impact of joining

Member countries Population Area (km²) GDP
(billion US$)
GDP
per capita (US$)
Languages
 Iceland 321,857 103,001 13.654 42,423 Icelandic
EU28 507,890,191 4,381,376 17,267 33,998 24
EU28+1 508,212,048
(+0.06%)
4,484,377
(+2.35%)
17,280.654
(+0.079%)
34,002
(+0.01%)
25

Explanations for Iceland's Non-membership of the European Union

Academics have proposed several explanations for why Iceland has not joined the European Union:

  • The importance of the fishing industry to Iceland's economy and the perception that EU membership will have an adverse effect on the fishing industry.[202][203]
  • The perception that EU membership will have an adverse effect on Iceland's agricultural sector.[203]
  • Iceland's strong ties with the United States, which included significant economic, diplomatic and military assistance, decreased Iceland's dependence on European countries.[203]
  • The victories in the Cod Wars may have strengthened Icelandic nationalism and boosted the perception that Iceland can succeed through unilateral or bilateral means rather than compromise in multilateral frameworks.[203]
  • The Icelandic electoral system favors rural areas, which are more euroskeptic.[203]
  • The tendency for Icelandic elites to pursue education in the United States or euroskeptic European countries (such as the United Kingdom or the Nordic countries), and to cooperate more closely with political elites from those countries.[203]
  • Icelandic nationalism and the legacy of Iceland's past as a colonial entity.[204][205]
  • The impact of the Icesave dispute with the Netherlands and the UK.[204]

See also

References

Notes

  1. Timeline of events – Iceland's application for membership of the EU, Icelandic Ministry for Foreign Affairs Archived 16 October 2011 at WebCite
  2. RÚV, Application not formally withdrawn
  3. 3.0 3.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  4. National Referendum – Iceland's application for membership of the EU, Icelandic Ministry for Foreign Affairs Archived 16 October 2011 at WebCite
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 Iceland´s home is in Europe, Icelandic Ministry of Foreign Affairs Archived 17 October 2011 at WebCite
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 Iceland, EEAS Archived 28 October 2013 at the Wayback Machine
  7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 Iceland, European Commission Archived 25 March 2013 at the Wayback Machine
  8. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  9. Rettman, Andrew (9 February 2006). Iceland in EU by 2015, prime minister says. EU Observer. Archived 16 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine
  10. Prime Minister Ásgrímsson as good as alone in his predictions. EU related news from Iceland, 14 February 2006 Archived 25 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
  11. Slashing the rumours: Iceland is far from adopting the euro. Team. 2 May 2007 Archived 13 February 2012 at the Wayback Machine
  12. Iceland Mulls EU Membership, DW-World, 24 May 2007 Archived 18 January 2012 at the Wayback Machine
  13. Geir: Ég vil ekki ganga í ESB. Mbl.is 17 May 2008 (Icelandic) Archived 26 July 2009 at the Wayback Machine
  14. Iceland moves to shore up economy. BBC News. 5 October 2008 Archived 8 October 2008 at the Wayback Machine
  15. "Iceland sees rift over EU membership" ft.com 30 October 2008
  16. Independence Party to Form New Policy on EU. Iceland Review. 17 November 2008 Archived 17 February 2012 at the Wayback Machine
  17. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  18. Ályktun um Evrópumál Archived 22 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine
  19. Johnson, Miles (24 April 2009). Iceland minister warns on EU. Financial Times.
  20. Progressives support Iceland EU entry. Ice News. 17 January 2009 Archived 14 February 2012 at the Wayback Machine
  21. Iceland Progressives vote to back EU accession talks. Forbes. 16 January 2009
  22. Iceland's biggest party wants two EU referendums, EUBusiness, 28 March 2009 Archived 5 June 2011 at the Wayback Machine
  23. Icelandic parties clarify EU positions ahead of snap polls, EUBusiness, 31 March 2009 Archived 5 June 2011 at the Wayback Machine
  24. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  25. Britain to Help Speed up Iceland’s EU Membership. Iceland Review. 22 April 2009 Archived 17 February 2012 at the Wayback Machine
  26. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  27. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  28. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  29. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  30. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  31. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  32. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  33. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  34. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  35. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  36. Iceland could 'quickly' join the EU if requested: Commissioner Archived 23 October 2008 at the Wayback Machine
  37. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  38. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  39. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  40. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  41. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  42. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  43. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  44. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  45. The application letter itself[dead link]
  46. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  47. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  48. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  49. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  50. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  51. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  52. 52.0 52.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  53. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  54. Commission Opinion on Iceland's application for membership of the European Union Archived 1 January 2012 at the Wayback Machine
  55. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  56. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  57. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  58. U summit approves membership talks for Iceland; World News; 17 June 2010. Archived 18 December 2013 at the Wayback Machine
  59. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  60. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  61. EC press release, 14 July 2010 Archived 24 August 2010 at the Wayback Machine
  62. European Commission, ICELAND 2010 PROGRESS REPORT
  63. European Parliament, MEPs welcome Iceland's progress towards EU membership, 22 March 2011 Archived 21 December 2013 at the Wayback Machine
  64. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  65. 65.0 65.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  66. Viðræðurnar við ESB verði settar á ís MBL.is Archived 26 September 2013 at the Wayback Machine
  67. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  68. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  69. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  70. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  71. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  72. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  73. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  74. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  75. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  76. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  77. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  78. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  79. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  80. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  81. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  82. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  83. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  84. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  85. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  86. RÚV, Application not formally withdrawn
  87. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  88. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  89. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  90. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  91. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  92. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  93. 93.0 93.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  94. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  95. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  96. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  97. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  98. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  99. 99.0 99.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  100. 100.0 100.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  101. 101.0 101.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  102. 102.0 102.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  103. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  104. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  105. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  106. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  107. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  108. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  109. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  110. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  111. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  112. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  113. 113.00 113.01 113.02 113.03 113.04 113.05 113.06 113.07 113.08 113.09 113.10 113.11 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  114. Screening process concluded Archived 17 October 2011 at WebCite
  115. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  116. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  117. 117.0 117.1 117.2 117.3 117.4 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  118. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  119. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  120. 120.0 120.1 120.2 120.3 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  121. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  122. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  123. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  124. End of screening meeting on Free movement of goods Archived 17 October 2011 at WebCite
  125. 125.0 125.1 125.2 125.3 125.4 125.5 125.6 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  126. End of screening meeting on Freedom of Movement For Workers Archived 17 October 2011 at WebCite
  127. First screening meeting between Iceland and the EU over Archived 17 October 2011 at WebCite
  128. 128.0 128.1 128.2 128.3 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  129. Screening meeting on Company law concluded yesterday Archived 17 October 2011 at WebCite
  130. 130.0 130.1 130.2 130.3 130.4 130.5 130.6 130.7 130.8 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  131. Screening meeting on Intellectual property law concluded Archived 17 October 2011 at WebCite
  132. Screening meeting on Competition policy concluded Archived 17 October 2011 at WebCite
  133. 133.0 133.1 133.2 133.3 133.4 133.5 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  134. Screening meeting on Financial services concluded on Wednesday Archived 17 October 2011 at WebCite
  135. 135.0 135.1 135.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  136. Screening meeting on Information society and media concluded Archived 17 October 2011 at WebCite
  137. Screening meeting on Agriculture and rural development concluded Archived 17 October 2011 at WebCite
  138. Screening meeting on Food Safety concluded Archived 17 October 2011 at WebCite
  139. Screening Meeting on Fisheries Concluded Archived 17 October 2011 at WebCite
  140. Screening meeting on energy concluded Archived 17 October 2011 at WebCite
  141. Screening Meeting on Taxation concluded Archived 17 October 2011 at WebCite
  142. Screening meeting on Economic and Monetary Policy concluded Archived 17 October 2011 at WebCite
  143. Screening on Social Policy and Employment Concluded Archived 17 October 2011 at WebCite
  144. Screening on enterprise and industrial policy concluded Archived 17 October 2011 at WebCite
  145. Screening on Regional Policy and Coordination of structural instrument concluded Archived 21 March 2012 at the Wayback Machine
  146. Screening meeting on Judiciary and fundamental rights concluded Archived 17 October 2011 at WebCite
  147. Screening meeting on science and research concluded Archived 17 October 2011 at WebCite
  148. Screening meeting on education and culture concluded at the Wayback Machine (archived June 5, 2011)[dead link]
  149. Screening meeting on environment concluded Archived 17 October 2011 at WebCite
  150. Screening meeting on Consumer and Health Protection concluded at the Wayback Machine (archived May 27, 2011)[dead link]
  151. Screening meeting on Customs Union concluded in Brussels Archived 17 October 2011 at WebCite
  152. Screening meeting on External Relations concluded Archived 17 October 2011 at WebCite
  153. Screening meeting on Financial and Budgetary Provisions concluded Archived 17 October 2011 at WebCite
  154. 154.0 154.1 Excluding chapters 34 (institutions) and 35 (other issues) since these are not legislation chapters.
  155. Meirihluti hlynntur aðild að ESB, Samtök iðnaðarins, 01.09.2005 (Icelandic) Archived 17 July 2012 at the Wayback Machine
  156. Iceland cool on EU membership, EU Observer, 22 February 2006 Archived 16 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine
  157. Euro support in Iceland hits five-year high, SI(samtök iðnaðarins(Association for Icelandic industry)), 09.11.2007 (Icelandic) Archived 7 February 2012 at the Wayback Machine
  158. Majority of Icelanders Wants to Join EU IcelandReview, 26 February 2008 Archived 3 October 2013 at the Wayback Machine
  159. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  160. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  161. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  162. "Meirihluti andvígur ESB", visir.is, 26 January 2009. http://visir.is/article/20090126/FRETTIR01/140609051/-1 Archived 2 October 2013 at the Wayback Machine
  163. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  164. Fækkar heldur sem styðja viðræður
  165. Mikill meirihluti vill viðræður RÚV, 5.06.2009 Archived 15 June 2011 at the Wayback Machine
  166. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  167. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  168. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  169. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  170. Original question: Ef aðild Íslands að Evrópusambandinu (ESB) yrði borin undir þjóðaratkvæði í dag, hvernig telur þú líklegast að þú myndir greiða atkvæði?
  171. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  172. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  173. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  174. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  175. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  176. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  177. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  178. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  179. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  180. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  181. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  182. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  183. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  184. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  185. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  186. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  187. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  188. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  189. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  190. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  191. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  192. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  193. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  194. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  195. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  196. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  197. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  198. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  199. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  200. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  201. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  202. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  203. 203.0 203.1 203.2 203.3 203.4 203.5 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  204. 204.0 204.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  205. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

External links

Official websites
News Portal
Lobbyist organisations