Joe Biden sexual assault allegation

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

In March 2020, Tara Reade alleged that Joe Biden, former U.S. vice president and presumptive Democratic nominee in the 2020 presidential election, sexually assaulted her in the spring of 1993, in a Capitol Hill office building when she was a staff assistant in his Senate office. She previously alleged to reporters in April 2019 that he touched her neck and shoulders in ways that made her feel uncomfortable. She did not mention the alleged assault at the time or suggest that there was more to the story, instead faulting his staff.

In April 2020, Reade said she told Biden's Senate staff in 1993 about harassment. The former staff members she named said that they did not receive a complaint from her. On May 1, Biden denied her claims and requested the secretary of the United States Senate search for and release any documents pertaining to the complaint she said she filed in 1993. The request was rejected. In an interview on May 14, Biden stated that he does not remember Reade at all.

Background and previous allegations

File:Tara Reade (cropped, color cast removed).png
Tara Reade's U.S. House of Representatives identification badge photo

Tara Reade worked as a staff assistant in Biden's U.S. Senate office from December 1992 to August 1993. At the time, she was in her late twenties.[1][2][3][4] "Over the years, Reade spoke favorably about working for Biden", reported the Associated Press in 2020.[5] CNN wrote, "In more recent years, Reade has praised Biden on social media on numerous occasions." When a reporter asked her why, she said she feels conflicted about him, liking what he did politically for women's issues and noting, "Many things are true at once."[6]

In April 2019, Reade contacted The Union, a local newspaper in Grass Valley, California about her employment working for Joe Biden.[7] Her position as a staff assistant in his Senate office in Washington, D.C., gave her responsibilities for the office's intern program and mail delivery.[8] She alleged during that Biden "used to put his hand on my shoulder and run his finger up my neck".[7][9] Reade also told of an incident where (unnamed) staff under Biden argued over whether she should serve drinks at an event.[7] Reade said that she heard from (unnamed) staff that Biden wanted her to do so because he liked her legs.[7][10] Reade said she complained to Senate personnel, but Biden's office learned about her complaints.[7][10]

Reade stated: "My life was hell ... this was about power and control ... [after my departure] I couldn't get a job on the Hill".[7] According to the article, Reade "didn't consider the acts toward her sexualization. She instead used an analogy of being a lamp that was displayed because it was pretty and discarded when too bright.[7][9][11] Reade said she wants Biden to say "I changed the trajectory of your life. I'm sorry."[7] Previously in 2018, she had attributed her 1993 departure from Washington to pursuing a career as an actress or artiste due to her disappointment at the American government's "xenophobia" toward Russia. Earlier in 2009, she had attributed her 1993 departure from Washington to moving to the Midwestern United States with a boyfriend.[12] These conflicting accounts were written on Medium, and they were deleted by 2020.[6] In 2020, Reade described the contradictory accounts as "stupid blog posts" she made while she was working on writing a novel, when she "wasn't ready to talk about Biden". Reade also claimed that she could not recall writing about American government's "xenophobia".[6]

Around the same time as that report, The Union published a column by Reade where she alleged that her supervisor had informed her that Biden wanted her to "serve drinks at a [sic] event" because he thought she was "pretty" and also "liked" her legs, but a senior aide intervened to stop Reade from having to do so, continuing an argument among the staff.[13] After that, Biden would "often" touch her shoulder and neck.[13] Reade felt that "these gestures were not so much about ‘connection' but establishing dominance in the room."[13] Reade also wrote in that essay that "this is not a story about sexual misconduct; it is a story about abuse of power."[13] Reade said she spoke out in 2019 after watching an episode of The View, during which she says most of the panelists defended Biden and attacked Lucy Flores, the former assemblywoman who alleged that Biden kissed the back of her head without consent.[14][15]

In April 2019, the Associated Press interviewed Reade about the allegations she was making at the time, but did not publish an article because they found that parts of her story contradicted other reports and they could not corroborate her accusations. At the time, Reade told the Associated Press that Biden rubbed her shoulders and neck and played with her hair. She said a fellow aide told her to dress more modestly at work. She said regarding Biden: "I wasn't scared of him, that he was going to take me in a room or anything. It wasn't that kind of vibe."[16]

The Washington Post also interviewed Reade in 2019, but did not publish an article about that interview. Later in 2020, The Washington Post wrote that Reade had told them that Biden touched her neck and shoulders, "and he had people around saying it was okay". Reade blamed Biden's staff for "bullying", giving less blame to Biden himself: "This is what I want to emphasize: It’s not him. It's the people around him who keep covering for him ... he should have known what was happening to me ... Maybe he could have been a little more in touch with his own staff." The Washington Post stated that Reade in 2019 "did not mention the alleged assault or suggest there was more to the story."[12][17]

In April 2019, Reade contacted Vox reporter Laura McGann to tell her story. Vox did not publish any stories about Reade in 2019 after McGann failed to verify Reade's account, but McGann did write an article praising other women who had shared allegations about Biden's inappropriate touches. In May 2020, McGann detailed the allegations Reade made to her in 2019, including: "I don't know if [Biden] knew why I left ... He barely knew us by name." Reade sent her an essay that was similar to her essay published by The Union in 2019. McGann highlighted the following sentences, which were identical in both essays: "This is not a story about sexual misconduct; it is a story about abuse of power. It is a story about when a member of Congress allows staff to threaten or belittle or bully on their behalf unchecked to maintain power rather than modify the behavior."[18] Reade explained that she had not shared her full story in 2019 because she felt like "the media was shutting her down," but McGann disputes the accuracy of this characterization of reporters' interactions, and notes that Reade had formerly been "adamant ... that this wasn't a misconduct story."[18]

In 2019, Reade told McGann that she could only name her dead mother and a friend as the sources she had confided in. The friend in 2019 told McGann: "... it wasn't that bad. [Biden] never tried to kiss her directly. He never went for one of those touches. It was one of those, 'sorry you took it that way.' ... What was creepy was that it was always in front of people." In other details, Reade told McGann that The New York Times had three reporters working on her story, and also gave a heads up to McGann that other media outlets were getting ready to publish her story.[18]

On May 22, 2020, the veracity of Reade's testimony was challenged by California attorneys against whose clients she had testified in court.[19] Reade had served as an expert witness on multiple cases involving domestic violence in Monterey County, California, and testified that she had received a bachelor's degree from Antioch University Seattle. Reade has previously claimed that she received a Bachelor of Arts degree in Political Science through a program for victims of abuse, using a different name and social security number from those used for earlier coursework completed at Pasadena City College.[20][21][22][23] Antioch University officials said that Reade attended for three academic quarters and did not graduate from the university.[22][23]

Defendants' attorneys and the district attorney's office announced the review of cases to determine whether Reade misrepresented her credentials, and whether her testimony significantly influenced the outcome of the cases.[22][23]

Sexual assault allegation

In a March 25, 2020, interview with Katie Halper, Reade alleged that Biden had pushed her against a wall, kissed her, put his hand under her skirt, penetrated her with his fingers, and asked, "Do you want to go somewhere else?"[8][24] Reade told National Public Radio (NPR) for an April 19 article, "His hands went underneath my clothing and he was touching me in my private areas and without my consent."[24] Reade told The Intercept her impression was that Biden believed he had consent and was surprised when she rejected him.[25] Reade told The New York Times for an April 12 article that when she pulled away from Biden, he looked puzzled and said, "Come on, man, I heard you liked me." She then said he told her "You're nothing to me, nothing," followed by "You're OK, you're fine."[3] Reade told NPR she could not remember the exact place or date of the incident, stating it was likely a basement of a D.C. Senate office building in the spring of 1993.[24]

Asked why she did not present the sexual assault allegations earlier, Reade told Newsweek she "didn't really know how to [come forward] because, how would you?"[26] Reade had contacted Time's Up Legal Defense Fund seeking legal and public relations support in an effort to "get her story out in a safe way". Uma Iyer, vice president of The National Women's Law Center (NWLC), which oversees and distributes funds for Time's Up, expressed their desire to provide her as much assistance as they possibly could but funding her legal defense was not possible because of restrictions imposed by their 501(c)(3) status.[26][27] Time's Up provided Reade a list of attorneys to contact; Reade said she contacted all of them, but none agreed to represent her.[3] After failing to secure legal help, Reade wrote in a January 2020 post on Medium, "I have not told the whole story of what occurred between Joe Biden and myself."[27]

Reade told The New York Times that, after the alleged assault, she had reported about harassment to three of Biden's aides (Ted Kaufman, Dennis Toner, and Marianne Baker), but did not mention the assault.[3] She said that nothing happened as a result, so she wrote a complaint to a Senate personnel office,[3] where she filled out a form to request counselling.[28] Reade told the Associated Press that her complaint to the Senate personnel office was about "retaliation" and "him wanting me to serve drinks because he liked my legs and thought I was pretty and it made me uncomfortable", with no explicit mention of sexual assault or sexual harassment.[16] Reade did not keep a copy of her Senate personnel office complaint.[16]

Reade also told The New York Times that her office duties were eventually reduced and that Kaufman later said that she did not fit the office, instructing her to find a new job.[3] However, Reade told the Associated Press that it was Toner who stated she did not fit the job and encouraged her to find another job, which the Associated Press noted was a contradiction with her account to The New York Times.[29] In blog posts in January and April 2020, she wrote that no one in Washington, D.C., wanted to hire her after her firing.[12]

Addressing why she made her sexual assault allegation public, Reade said during her March interview, "I'm hoping by coming forward with this—and I know it's hard to listen to, and it's hard to live in it, right? But my justice now, the only justice I can have, is to be moving freely in the world and to heal and not be silenced."[8] According to The Intercept, Reade had feared coming forward with her full story of sexual assault and "went silent" after receiving harassment online related to her earlier allegations in April 2019 of inappropriate touching, saying that she later "thought about the world she wanted her daughter to live in and decided that she wanted to continue telling her story".[15] She said she did not share her assault allegation when she initially came forward because, in part, she "just didn't have the courage,"[30] and that after publicly alleging that he had touched her inappropriately, she said she received death threats, a "wave of criticism,"[3] and was doxed.[31]

On April 9, Reade filed a police report with the Washington Metropolitan Police Department alleging she was sexually assaulted in the spring of 1993.[24][32] Reade acknowledged that the statute of limitations has lapsed, and she stated that she filed the report "for safety reasons only".[33] The Washington Metropolitan Police said on April 25 that her complaint is an inactive case.[34][35][33] According to USA Today, "A record reviewed by AP didn't mention Biden by name. NPR has reported, however, that a record does name Biden and has filed a Freedom of Information Act request for the full report."[36]

On April 28, Reade told Fox News, "I'm calling for the release of the documents being held by the University of Delaware that contain Biden's staff personnel records because I believe it will have my complaint form, as well as my separation letter and other documents," and questioned why they were under seal.[37][lower-alpha 1][lower-alpha 2] In response, on May 1, Biden issued a statement saying that staff personnel files are stored in the National Archives and Records Administration, and not stored in his documents at University of Delaware. He then called on the secretary of the Senate to work with the National Archives to identify and release any complaint by Reade and any other relevant documents.[43][44][45] Biden reiterated his request later that morning in an interview with Mika Brzezinski on MSNBC. The same day, New York Times reporter Lisa Lerer said Reade had cancelled a planned interview with Fox News, stating that "death threats received by her and her child made her nervous about being in the public eye".[46] On May 4, the secretary of the Senate's office stated that it could not comply with Biden's request, as the records are "strictly confidential". Biden's campaign then asked whether the existence of the records and their complainants could be disclosed, as well as procedures and forms for such complaints in 1993.[47][48] In an interview with Megyn Kelly, Reade said she would be willing to take a polygraph if Biden did.[49][50]

On May 8, the Associated Press reported that lawyers Douglas Wigdor and William Moran were representing Reade.[51] Wigdor, who is known for representing six women who alleged sexual misconduct by Harvey Weinstein and for being a prominent Trump donor, stated that he was working pro bono; Moran is a former writer and editor for Russian news agency Sputnik.[51] On May 11, Wigdor said that his firm had sent a letter to Biden to again ask for permission to search his archives and to the Senate Secretary's office to release a copy of the complaint Reade allegedly filed in 1993.[52] On May 22, Wigdor announced that he was no longer representing Reade.[1]

Denial and response

In March 2020, Biden's presidential campaign issued a response through a deputy campaign manager, Kate Bedingfield. She said, "Vice President Biden has dedicated his public life to changing the culture and the laws around violence against women. He authored and fought for the passage and reauthorization of the landmark Violence Against Women Act. He firmly believes that women have a right to be heard — and heard respectfully. Such claims should also be diligently reviewed by an independent press. What is clear about this claim: It is untrue. This absolutely did not happen."[3]

Biden personally addressed the allegation on May 1, declaring in a live interview on the MSNBC program Morning Joe that "it never, never happened".[53] Additionally, Biden issued an official statement denying the allegation, and calling for the media to "examine and evaluate the full and growing record of inconsistencies in her story, which has changed repeatedly in both small and big ways."[44] In his formal statement, Biden referenced the Violence Against Women Act he said he wrote "over 25 years ago", adding:

<templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />

I knew we had to change not only the law, but the culture. ... I recognize my responsibility to be a voice, an advocate, and a leader for the change in culture that has begun but is nowhere near finished. So I want to address allegations by a former staffer that I engaged in misconduct 27 years ago. They aren't true.[54]

Following the allegation, David Axelrod, a former top aide for President Barack Obama's 2008 campaign, stated that the vetting process for choosing Biden as the Vice President did not find any allegations of sexual misconduct.[55]

On May 14, asked by MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell if he remembered Reade, Biden said, "to be honest with you, I don't."[56]

Accounts by Reade's associates

An April 12, a New York Times article reported that the publication had conducted interviews with Reade, several of her friends, lawyers, nearly two dozen people who worked with Biden in the early 1990s, and seven women who accused him of kissing, hugging, or touching them in ways that had made them feel uncomfortable. It said it found no other allegations of sexual assault in the course of its reporting. Several of the seven women said that they believed Reade, but had no new knowledge about the incident.[3] One friend said that Reade had told her about the alleged assault in 1993, while another said that Reade told her, in 2008, that there was inappropriate touching.[3] The NYT story included two former interns who said they remembered Reade 'suddenly changing roles and no longer overseeing them' at the same time Reade said she had been 'abruptly reassigned'.[3]

Anonymous individuals who said that they have heard from Reade previously were not only reported in The New York Times, but also in other outlets. Due to a lack of identification, it is unknown which of these anonymous individuals overlap.[57] The Associated Press reported in April that it spoke with two more people who said Reade had told them parts of her story years ago, publishing their accounts anonymously. One was told of the alleged assault in 1993, and another remembers hearing of "sexual harassment" in 2007 or 2008.[29] The Washington Post spoke to "a friend, a former intern for another lawmaker", that said that Reade had alleged an assault soon after it happened.[12] CNN spoke to a friend of Reade's who had previously interned for Senator Ted Kennedy, who says she was told of both sexual harassment and sexual assault at the time, and that in 2019, she had advised Reade to only go public about harassment, not assault.[58]

In May 2020, Vox journalist Laura McGann spoke again to the anonymous friend who in 2019 told McGann that she heard Biden had touched Reade but had not sexually assaulted her, having not even "tried to kiss her directly". The friend now told McGann a story matching Reade's 2020 allegation of sexual assault, explaining the earlier lack of such: "She wanted to leave a layer there, and I did not want to betray that. It just wasn't my place."[18]

Some associates of Reade who claim they have heard from her previously have disclosed their identities. Lorraine Sanchez came forward to Business Insider; she was Reade's co-worker from 1994–1996, and says she was told about "sexual harassment" by Reade, and about a complaint filed, leading to the loss of her job, but she does not recall if Reade named Biden or what kind of harassment took place.[57][59] Lynda LaCasse, an ex-neighbour of Reade's, also came forward to Business Insider, and later CNN, for articles published on April 27 and April 28 respectively.[18][59][58] LaCasse told CNN that Reade had told her about the alleged assault by Biden "...in the mid-1990s". LaCasse told CNN she had advised Reade at the time to file a police report. According to CNN, "it was last year when Reade brought up Biden that LaCasse told her that she remembered their conversation about the alleged sexual assault".[58] LaCasse told Business Insider that she remembered the allegations when Reade contacted her recently, saying: "this Joe Biden thing is coming up again."[60][61]

Vox journalist Laura McGann asked Reade why she had not mentioned Lynda LaCasse as a potential relevant source either in 2019, or in 2020 to the first few journalists who had interviewed Reade, including Katie Halper. Reade replied that she did not think LaCasse was a relevant source because she only told LaCasse about the incident in 1995. Reade also told McGann that she had also originally thought that two other anonymous friends were not relevant, and thus had not mentioned them to journalists earlier.[18]

Collin Moulton, Reade's brother, initially reported to The Washington Post that Reade told him in 1993 that Biden had touched her neck and shoulders. He said there was "a gym bag incident", and that Biden "was inappropriate". ABC News also interviewed Moulton in March 2020; he told them that Reade had mentioned "'harassment at work' from Biden" but that "he only heard her account of the assault this spring". [12] Later that day, Moulton texted ABC News to "clarify" that Reade had told him in 1993 that Biden had "more or less cornered her against a wall" and "put his hands up her clothes."[62]

Reade said in April 2020 that she had told her mother, Jeanette Altimus, about the incident in 1993.[63] When Reade went public with the allegation in 2020, Altimus was dead.[63] Reade and her brother stated that their mother had encouraged Reade to call the police after the alleged incident, and that her brother regretted having previously told Reade to "move on, guys are idiots".[15] Reade previously said that Altimus called into Larry King Live anonymously "saying my daughter was sexually harassed and retaliated against and fired, where can she go for help?"[63] The episode, which was about the "cutthroat nature of Washington, DC, politics and media,"[64] was broadcast by CNN on August 11, 1993, with the title "Washington: The Cruelest City on Earth?"[65] and featured an anonymous caller from San Luis Obispo, California, who said: "I'm wondering what a staffer would do besides go to the press in Washington? My daughter has just left there, after working for a prominent senator, and could not get through with her problems at all, and the only thing she could have done was go to the press, and she chose not to do it out of respect for him."[63] King then asked: "So she had a story to tell but out of respect for the person she worked for she didn't tell it?" The caller answered: "That's true."[63] CNN verified that Altimus lived in San Luis Obispo at the time of the call.[66]

On May 7, 2020, The Tribune reported on a declaration Reade's former husband, Theodore Dronen, submitted to a court in 1996 to contest a restraining order Reade had filed against him after he had filed for divorce.[65] Dronen wrote that Reade had mentioned "a problem she was having at work regarding sexual harassment, in U.S. Senator Joe Biden's office." The document did not name Biden as the perpetrator or mention sexual assault. Dronen added that Reade "eventually struck a deal with the chief of staff of the Senator's office and left her position ... It was obvious that this event had a very traumatic effect on [Reade], and that she is still sensitive and effected [sic] by it". Dronen cited the alleged incident as one of several examples that "color [Reade's] perception and judgment" for her request of a restraining order. Dronen confirmed to The Tribune on May 7, 2020, that he had written the declaration, and declined to comment any further on it, saying "Tara and I ended our relationship over two decades ago under difficult circumstances. I am not interested in reliving that chapter of my life. I wish Tara well, and I have nothing further to say."[65]

Politico interviewed several former acquaintances who recalled bad experiences with Reade and described her as deceitful and manipulative. They said that she had only spoken positively of her time with Biden; one who was later phoned by Reade in 2019 became suspicious of the motives behind the call, because of a sense that she "was trying to plant a story with me" in order to claim corroboration.[67]

Accounts by former Biden staffers

In the April 12 New York Times article, Reade named three aides that she asserted she complained to about harassment by Biden (but not sexual assault). In the same article, these three aides denied Reade's assertion. Ted Kaufman, Biden's chief of staff at the time, said: "I did not know her. She did not come to me. If she had, I would have remembered her."[3] Former deputy chief of staff, Dennis Toner, said "It's just so preposterous that Senator Biden would be faced with these allegations. I don't remember her. I don't remember this conversation. And I would remember this conversation."[3] Biden's campaign released a statement from Marianne Baker, Biden's former executive assistant: "I never once witnessed, or heard of, or received, any reports of inappropriate conduct, period — not from Ms. Reade, not from anyone. I have absolutely no knowledge or memory of Ms. Reade's accounting of events, which would have left a searing impression on me as a woman professional, and as a manager."[3] Separately, Melissa Lefko, a contemporary staff assistant, said she had never experienced harassment and thought his office was a "very supportive environment for women."[3]

On May 15, 2020, the PBS NewsHour published an article summarizing their interviews with 74 former Biden staffers. Many of the staffers did not believe Reade's allegations. Over 20 of the interviewees worked there at the same as Reade; many of them did not remember her. The authors of the article, Daniel Bush and Lisa Desjardins, concluded from the interviews that "Biden was known as a demanding but fair and family-oriented boss, devoted to his home life in Delaware and committed to gender equality in his office", and that he was not one of the "creepy" male senators that female staffers told each other to avoid.[4]

While some details of Reade's recollections of her time in Biden's office were corroborated (including Biden's gym route, being told to dress more modestly), others were contradicted. None of the staffers had heard about any sexual misconduct by Biden. Some staffers doubted that Biden could have assaulted Reade as described without being seen, because the area was typically crowded with people and lacked any out-of-view private areas or alcoves that could match Reade's recollection. Certain staffers ruled out her claim of being asked to serve drinks at a fundraiser. Over 50 staffers said that they did not remember attending campaign fundraisers for Biden; some recounted that there was a policy banning staffers from campaigning.[4]

One staffer, Ben Savage, who said he worked directly beside Reade, told PBS and CNN that Reade was overwhelmed by the workload and that he reported her to deputy chief of staff Dennis Toner for mishandling constituent mail, resulting in her tasks being diminished, and her job was eventually terminated for not performing well enough.[4][6] Savage additionally told CNN that Reade instead believed that she lost her job due to "being discriminated against for her health issue" (though Savage declined to reveal what the health issue was).[6]

Commentary

NPR's Asma Khalid wrote, "Some details of Reade's account have been inconsistent, and her story has changed over time", noting that in 2019 she did not mention sexual assault.[24] Katie Halper, whose interview with Reade contained the sexual assault allegation, said the story had not changed, writing in The Guardian, "Reade provided more details over time, something that is common among survivors of sexual assault."[68] In response to similar claims from Amanda Marcotte of Salon regarding inconsistencies in Reade's account, Nathan J. Robinson of Current Affairs mentioned that he had talked to Reade extensively and that she was "completely consistent and frank".[69] Laura McGann of Vox, who conducted multiple interviews of Reade and other relevant sources, stated: "The story that both she and her corroborating witnesses are telling has changed dramatically."[18] Joan Walsh, writing in The Nation, said Reade's allegation of sexual assault "doesn't stand up to close scrutiny".[70] The Guardian columnist Arwa Mahdawi said it was frustrating to see conservatives "weaponize the accusations" and liberals "turning a blind eye" to them.[71][72] Political commentator Jonathan Chait stated that at first he found Reade's claims believable, but that the findings reported by PBS, Laura McGann in Vox, and Natasha Korecki in Politico cast doubt on the veracity of the allegations.[73]

References

Footnotes

  1. Reade has said she filed a complaint with a congressional personnel office, but that it does not mention sexual assault, or the phrase "sexual harassment". Instead, she used the words "uncomfortable" and "retaliation".[16][38][39]
  2. Biden's senatorial records in the possession of the University of Delaware consist of "1,875 boxes and 415 gigabytes of electronic content, largely uncatalogued".[40] A spokeswoman for the university said that the curation of the records would not be completed before 2021 and that they were unable to identify specific documents or files within the collection.[41] On May 20, the school denied a Freedom of Information act request from Fox News on the grounds that state law exempts them from requests other than those related to "public funds".[42]

Citations

  1. 1.0 1.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  2. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  3. 3.00 3.01 3.02 3.03 3.04 3.05 3.06 3.07 3.08 3.09 3.10 3.11 3.12 3.13 3.14 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  5. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.5 7.6 7.7 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  8. 8.0 8.1 8.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  9. 9.0 9.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  10. 10.0 10.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  11. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  12. 12.0 12.1 12.2 12.3 12.4 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  13. 13.0 13.1 13.2 13.3 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  14. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  15. 15.0 15.1 15.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  16. 16.0 16.1 16.2 16.3 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  17. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  18. 18.0 18.1 18.2 18.3 18.4 18.5 18.6 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  19. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  20. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  21. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  22. 22.0 22.1 22.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  23. 23.0 23.1 23.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  24. 24.0 24.1 24.2 24.3 24.4 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  25. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  26. 26.0 26.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  27. 27.0 27.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  28. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  29. 29.0 29.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  30. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  31. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  32. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  33. 33.0 33.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  34. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  35. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  36. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  37. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  38. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  39. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  40. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  41. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  42. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  43. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  44. 44.0 44.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  45. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  46. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  47. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  48. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  49. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  50. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  51. 51.0 51.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  52. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  53. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  54. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  55. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  56. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  57. 57.0 57.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  58. 58.0 58.1 58.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  59. 59.0 59.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  60. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  61. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  62. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  63. 63.0 63.1 63.2 63.3 63.4 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  64. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  65. 65.0 65.1 65.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  66. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  67. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  68. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  69. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  70. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  71. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  72. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  73. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

External links