Kuder–Richardson Formula 20
In psychometrics, the Kuder–Richardson Formula 20 (KR-20) first published in 1937[1] is a measure of internal consistency reliability for measures with dichotomous choices. It is analogous to Cronbach's α, except Cronbach's α is also used for non-dichotomous (continuous) measures.[2] It is often claimed that a high KR-20 coefficient (e.g., > 0.90) indicates a homogeneous test. However, like Cronbach's α, homogeneity (that is, unidimensionality) is actually an assumption, not a conclusion, of reliability coefficients. It is possible, for example, to have a high KR-20 with a multidimensional scale, especially with a large number of items.
Values can range from 0.00 to 1.00 (sometimes expressed as 0 to 100), with high values indicating that the examination is likely to correlate with alternate forms (a desirable characteristic). The KR-20 may be affected by difficulty of the test, the spread in scores and the length of the examination.
In the case when scores are not tau-equivalent (for example when there is not homogeneous but rather examination items of increasing difficulty) then the KR-20 is an indication of the lower bound of internal consistency (reliability).
The formula for KR-20 for a test with K test items numbered i=1 to K is
![r= \frac{K}{K-1} \left[ 1 - \frac{\sum_{i=1}^K p_i q_i}{\sigma^2_X} \right]](/w/images/math/a/6/3/a636fcb47850f8fa6a66645dafcce21f.png)
where pi is the proportion of correct responses to test item i, qi is the proportion of incorrect responses to test item i (so that pi + qi = 1), and the variance for the denominator is
where n is the total sample size.
If it is important to use unbiased operators then the sum of squares should be divided by degrees of freedom (n − 1) and the probabilities are multiplied by
Since Cronbach's α was published in 1951, there has been no known advantage to KR-20 over Cronbach. KR-20 is seen as a derivative of the Cronbach formula, with the advantage to Cronbach that it can handle both dichotomous and continuous variables. The KR-20 formula can't be used when multiple-choice questions involve partial credit, and it requires detailed item analysis.[3]
References
- ↑ Kuder, G. F., & Richardson, M. W. (1937). The theory of the estimation of test reliability. Psychometrika, 2(3), 151–160.
- ↑ Cortina, J. M., (1993). What Is Coefficient Alpha? An Examination of Theory and Applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98–104.
- ↑ http://chemed.chem.purdue.edu/chemed/stats.html (as of 3/27/2013
