List of topics characterized as pseudoscience

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search

This is a list of topics that have, at one point or another in their history, been characterized as pseudoscience by academics or researchers. These characterizations were made in the context of educating the public about questionable or potentially fraudulent or dangerous claims and practices — efforts to define the nature of science, or humorous parodies of poor scientific reasoning. Criticism of pseudoscience, generally by the scientific community or skeptical organizations, involves critiques of the logical, methodological, or rhetorical bases of the topic in question.[1] Though some of the listed topics continue to be investigated scientifically, others were only subject to scientific research in the past and today are considered refuted but resurrected in a pseudoscientific fashion. Other ideas presented here are entirely non-scientific, but have in one way or another infringed on scientific domains or practices. Many adherents to or practitioners of the topics listed here dispute their characterization as pseudoscience. Each section summarizes the pseudoscientific aspects of that topic.

Physical sciences

Astronomy and space sciences

Earth sciences


  • Hongcheng Magic Liquid – a 1983 pseudoscience incident in China where an inventor claimed that he could turn water into a usable fuel by just adding a few drops of his "secret formula" liquid. The government of China and the Chinese Communist Party were alarmed by pseudoscience developments like this one and issued a joint proclamation condemning the recent decline of public education in science.[46] (Also see: Gasoline pill)
  • Hydrinos – are a supposed state of the hydrogen atom that, according to proponent Randell Mills, are of lower energy than ground state and thus a source of free energy.[47][48][49]
  • Perpetual motion – class of proposed machines that violate one of the Laws of Thermodynamics. Perpetual motion has been recognized as extrascientific since the late 18th century, but proposals and patents for such devices continue to be made to the present day.[13][17][50]


  • Vastu shastra is the ancient Hindu system of architecture, which lays down a series of rules for building houses in relation to ambiance. Scientists like Jayant Narlikar write that it has no "logical connection" with the environment and notes that sometimes what has already been built is demolished and rebuilt to accommodate the rules.[55][56] In another instance a minister ordered the demolition of a slum to change the entrance of his office, as per Vastu consultants who claimed that changing the entrance to an east-facing gate will solve his political problems.[57][58]


Life sciences

Agricultural sciences

  • Biodynamic agriculture – method of organic farming that treats farms as unified and individual organisms. Biodynamics uses a calendar which has been characterized as astrological. The substances and composts used by biodynamicists have been described as unconventional and homeopathic. For example, field mice are countered by deploying ashes prepared from field mice skin when Venus is in the Scorpius constellation.[63][64][65][66]


  • Attachment therapy – common name for a set of potentially fatal[67] clinical interventions and parenting techniques aimed at controlling aggressive, disobedient, or unaffectionate children using "restraint and physical and psychological abuse to seek their desired results."[68] (The term "attachment therapy" may sometimes be used loosely to refer to mainstream approaches based on attachment theory, usually outside the USA where pseudoscientific form of attachment therapy is less known). Probably the most common form is holding therapy in which the child is restrained by adults for the purpose of supposed cathartic release of suppressed rage and regression. Perhaps the most extreme, but much less common, is "rebirthing", in which the child is wrapped tightly in a blanket and then made to simulate emergence from a birth canal. This is done by encouraging the child to struggle and pushing and squeezing him/her to mimic contractions.[6] Despite the practice's name it is not based on traditional attachment theory and shares no principles of mainstream developmental psychology research.[69] In 2006 it was the subject of an almost entirely critical Taskforce Report commissioned by the American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children (APSAC).[70] Not all forms of attachment therapy are coercive and since the Candace Newmaker case there has been a move towards less coercive practices by leaders in the field.[70]
  • Brainwashing or Mind Control – A theoretical indoctrination process which results in "an impairment of autonomy, an inability to think independently, and a disruption of beliefs and affiliations. In this context, brainwashing refers to the involuntary reeducation of basic beliefs and values". The term has been applied to any tactic, psychological or otherwise, which can be seen as subverting an individual's sense of control over their own thinking, behavior, emotions or decision making. In 1983, the American Psychological Association (APA) asked Margaret Singer to chair a taskforce called the APA Task Force on Deceptive and Indirect Techniques of Persuasion and Control (DIMPAC) to investigate whether brainwashing or "coercive persuasion" did indeed play a role in "cult" recruitment. The APA found that brainwashing theories were without empirical proof, and rejected the DIMPAC report because the report "lacks the scientific rigor and evenhanded critical approach necessary for APA imprimatur".[71][72] Two critical letters from external reviewers Benjamin Beit-Hallahmi and Jeffery D. Fisher accompanied the APA's rejection memo. The letters criticized "brainwashing" as an unrecognized theoretical concept and Singer's reasoning as so flawed that it was "almost ridiculous."[73]
  • Conversion therapy – sometimes called reparative therapy, seeks to change a non-heterosexual person's sexual orientation so they will no longer be homosexual or bisexual.[74] The American Psychiatric Association defines reparative therapy as "psychiatric treatment...which is based upon the assumption that homosexuality per se is a mental disorder or based upon the a priori assumption that a patient should change their sexual homosexual orientation."[75][76][77]
  • Graphology – psychological test based on a belief that personality traits unconsciously and consistently influence handwriting morphology – that certain types of people exhibit certain quirks of the pen. Analysis of handwriting attributes provides no better than chance correspondence with personality, and neuroscientist Barry Beyerstein likened the assigned correlations to sympathetic magic.[6][52][78][79][80][81] Graphology is only superficially related to forensic document examination, which also examines handwriting.
  • Hypnosis – state of extreme relaxation and inner focus in which a person is unusually responsive to suggestions made by the hypnotist. The modern practice has its roots in the idea of animal magnetism, or mesmerism, originated by Franz Mesmer.[82] Mesmer's explanations were thoroughly discredited, and to this day there is no agreement amongst researchers whether hypnosis is a real phenomenon, or merely a form of participatory role-enactment.[6][83][84] Some aspects of suggestion have been clinically useful.[85][86] Other claimed uses of hypnosis more clearly fall within the area of pseudoscience. Such areas include the use of hypnotic regression beyond plausible limits, including past life regression.[87] Also see false memory syndrome.
  • Hypnotherapy – therapy that is undertaken with a subject in hypnosis.[88] It is widely considered a branch of Complementary and Alternative Medicine though its founder – James Braid – has been described as "one of the most ardent and influential critics of pseudo-science."[89]
  • It should be noted that using hypnosis for relaxation, mood control, and other related benefits (often related to meditation) is regarded as part of standard medical treatment rather than alternative medicine, particularly for patients subjected to difficult physical emotional stress in chemotherapy.[90]
  • Memetics – approach to evolutionary models of cultural information transfer based on the concept that units of information, or "memes", have an independent existence, are self-replicating, and are subject to selective evolution through environmental forces. Starting from a proposition put forward in the writings of Richard Dawkins, it has since turned into a new area of study, one that looks at the self-replicating units of culture. It has been proposed that just as memes are analogous to genes, memetics is analogous to genetics. Memetics has been deemed a pseudoscience on several fronts.[91] Its proponents' assertions have been labeled "untested, unsupported or incorrect"[91] though the same book contains Susan Blackmore's counter article "Memes as Good Science." Supporters of memetics include EO Wilson, Douglas Hofstadter and many others.
  • Neuro-linguistic programming – an approach to communication, personal development, and psychotherapy created in the 1970s. The title refers to a stated connection between the neurological processes ("neuro"), language ("linguistic") and behavioral patterns that have been learned through experience ("programming") and can be organized to achieve specific goals in life.[92][93] According to certain neuroscientists,[94] psychologists[95][96] and linguists,[97][98] NLP is unsupported by current scientific evidence, and uses incorrect and misleading terms and concepts. Reviews of empirical research on NLP indicate that NLP contains numerous factual errors,[99][100] and has failed to produce reliable results for the claims for effectiveness made by NLP’s originators and proponents.[96][101] According to Devilly,[102] NLP is no longer as prevalent as it was in the 1970s and 1980s. Criticisms go beyond the lack of empirical evidence for effectiveness; critics say that NLP exhibits pseudoscientific characteristics,[102] title,[94] concepts and terminology.[97] NLP is used as an example of pseudoscience for facilitating the teaching of scientific literacy at the professional and university level.[98][103][104] NLP also appears on peer reviewed expert-consensus based lists of discredited interventions.[96] In research designed to identify the "quack factor" in modern mental health practice, Norcross et al. (2006) [105] list NLP as possibly or probably discredited, and in papers reviewing discredited interventions for substance and alcohol abuse, Norcross et al. (2008)[106] list NLP in the "top ten" most discredited, and Glasner-Edwards and Rawson (2010) list NLP as "certainly discredited".[107]
  • Parapsychology – controversial discipline that seeks to investigate the existence and causes of psychic abilities and life after death using the scientific method. Parapsychological experiments have included the use of random number generators to test for evidence of precognition and psychokinesis with both human and animal subjects[108][109][110] and Ganzfeld experiments to test for extrasensory perception.[111]
  • Phrenology – now defunct system for determining personality traits by feeling bumps on the skull proposed by 18th-century physiologist Franz Joseph Gall.[6] In an early recorded use of the term "pseudo-science", François Magendie referred to phrenology as "a pseudo-science of the present day".[112] The assumption that personality can be read from bumps in the skull has since been thoroughly discredited. However, Gall's assumption that character, thoughts, and emotions are located in the brain is considered an important historical advance toward neuropsychology (see also localization of brain function, Brodmann's areas, neuro-imaging, modularity of mind or faculty psychology).[113]
  • Polygraphy ("lie detectors") – an interrogation method which measures and records several physiological indices such as blood pressure, pulse, respiration, and skin conductivity while the subject is asked and answers a series of questions. The belief is that deceptive answers will produce physiological responses that can be differentiated from those associated with non-deceptive answers. Many members of the scientific community consider polygraphy to be pseudoscience.[114][115] Polygraphy has little credibility among scientists.[116][117] Despite claims of 90–95% validity by polygraph advocates, and 95–100% by businesses providing polygraph services,[118] critics maintain that rather than a "test", the method amounts to an inherently unstandardizable interrogation technique whose accuracy cannot be established. A 1997 survey of 421 psychologists estimated the test's average accuracy at about 61%, a little better than chance.[119] Critics also argue that even given high estimates of the polygraph's accuracy a significant number of subjects (e.g. 10% given a 90% accuracy) will appear to be lying, and would unfairly suffer the consequences of "failing" the polygraph.
  • Primal therapy – sometimes presented as a science.[120] The Gale Encyclopedia of Psychology (2001) states that: "The theoretical basis for the therapy is the supposition that prenatal experiences and birth trauma form people's primary impressions of life and that they subsequently influence the direction our lives take... Truth be known, primal therapy cannot be defended on scientifically established principles. This is not surprising considering its questionable theoretical rationale."[121] Other sources have also questioned the scientific validity of primal therapy, some using the term "pseudoscience" (see Criticism of Primal Therapy).
  • Psychoanalysis – body of ideas developed by Austrian physician Sigmund Freud and his followers, which is devoted to the study of human psychological functioning and behavior. It has been controversial ever since its inception.[122] Karl Popper characterized it as pseudoscience based on psychoanalysis failing the requirement for falsifiability.[123][124] Frank Cioffi argued that "though Popper is correct to say that psychoanalysis is pseudoscientific and correct to say that it is unfalsifiable, he is mistaken to suggest that it is pseudoscientific because it is unfalsifiable. […] It is when [Freud] insists that he has confirmed (not just instantiated) [his empirical theses] that he is being pseudoscientific."[125]
  • Subliminal advertising, a visual or auditory information that is discerned below the threshold of conscious awareness and claims to have a powerful enduring effect on consuming habits. It went into disrepute in the late 1970s[126] but there has been renewed research interest recently.[6][83] The mainstream of accepted scientific opinion does not hold that Subliminal perception has a powerful, enduring effect on human behaviour.[127]

Applied sciences

Health and medicine

Pseudoscientific medical practices are often known as quackery.

  • Alternative medicine, as a category, has been described as pseudoscientific. The National Science Foundation has conducted surveys of the "Public Attitudes and Public Understanding" of "Science Fiction and Pseudoscience", which includes studying the popularity of alternative medicine. It considers belief in alternative medicine a matter of concern, defining it as "all treatments that have not been proven effective using scientific methods." After quoting the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry's listing of alternative medicine as one of many pseudoscientific subjects, as well as mentioning the concerns of individual scientists, organizations, and members of the science policymaking community, it comments that "nevertheless, the popularity of alternative medicine [with the public] appears to be increasing."[128] "At least 60 percent of U.S. medical schools devote classroom time to the teaching of alternative therapies, generating controversy within the scientific community."[128] In contrast, it has been reported that universities are "increasingly turning their backs on homoeopathy and complementary medicine amid opposition from the scientific community to "pseudo-science" degrees."[129] Degrees in alternative medicine have been described as "'pseudo-science' degrees",[128][129][130] "anti-scientific", and "harmful".[131]
  • Anthroposophic medicine, or anthroposophically extended medicine – a school of complementary and alternative medicine[132] founded in the 1920s by Rudolf Steiner and Ita Wegman based on the spiritual philosophy of anthroposophy. It is an individualized holistic and salutogenic approach to health, deemphasizing randomized controlled trials.[133][134] Anthroposophic medications are formulated to stimulate healing by matching "key dynamic forces" with symptoms,[135] and are prepared for external, oral, or parenteral introduction in various dilutions ranging from whole to homeopathic.[136] The use of vaccinations, antibiotics, and antipyretics is generally not recommended or delayed by practitioners.[137][138][139] Skeptics, such as Robert Carroll, liken to sympathetic magic the anthroposophic principle that curative plants may be identified by distortions or abnormalities in their morphology or physiology.[140] Carroll and others state that the system is not based in science.[140][141][142] Edzard Ernst suggests that no thorough scientific analysis of the efficacy of anthroposophical medicine as a system independent of its philosophical underpinnings has been undertaken; and that no evidence-based conclusions can be drawn as to the overall efficacy of the system.[143]
  • Applied kinesiology (AK) – a diagnostic method using manual muscle-strength testing for medical diagnosis and a subsequent determination of prescribed therapy, which proponents believe can identify health problems or nutritional deficiencies through practitioner assessment of external physical qualities such as muscle response, posture, or motion analysis. A variety of therapies are prescribed based on tested weakness or smoothness of muscle action and a conjectured viscerosomatic association between particular muscles and organs. For example, a practitioner will give the patient a jar containing a substance to hold in one hand, then test for muscle strength in the other hand; if there is little resistance, the practitioner may conclude that the patient is allergic to that substance. The sole use of Applied Kinesiology to diagnose or treat any allergy[144] or illness[145][146] is not scientifically supported, and the International College of Applied Kinesiology requires concurrent use of standard diagnostic techniques.[147] Applied kinesiologists are often chiropractors, but may also be naturopaths, physicians, dentists, nutritionists, physical therapists, massage therapists, and nurses.[145][148] Applied Kinesiology should not be confused with kinesiology, the scientific study of human movement.
  • Bates method for better eyesight – an educational method developed by ophthalmologist William Bates intended to improve vision "naturally" to the point at which it can allegedly eliminate the need for glasses by undoing a habitual strain to see.[164] In 1929 Bates was cited by the FTC for false or misleading advertising in connection with his book describing the method, Perfect Sight Without Glasses,[165] though the complaint was later dismissed.[166] Although some people claim to have improved their eyesight by following his principles, Bates' ideas about vision and accommodation have been rejected by mainstream ophthalmology and optometry.[167][168][169][170][171]
  • Biorhythms – hypothesis holding that human physiology and behavior are governed by physical, emotional, and intellectual cycles lasting 23, 28, and 33 days, respectively. The system posits that, for instance, errors in judgment are more probable on days when an individual's intellectual cycle, as determined by days since birth, is near a minimum. No biophysical mechanism of action has been discovered, and the predictive power of biorhythms charts is no better than chance.[6][172][173][174] For the scientific study of biological cycles such as circadian rhythms, see chronobiology.
  • Body memory – hypothesis that the body itself is capable of storing memories, as opposed to only the brain. This is used to explain having memories for events where the brain was not in a position to store memories and is sometimes a catalyst for repressed memories recovery.[175] These memories are often characterised with phantom pain in a part or parts of the body – the body appearing to remember the past trauma. The idea of body memory is a belief frequently associated with the idea of repressed memories, in which memories of incest or sexual abuse can be retained and recovered through physical sensations.[175][176]
  • Brain Gym – commercial training program that claims that any learning challenges can be overcome by finding the right movements, to subsequently create new pathways in the brain. They claim that the repetition of the 26 Brain Gym movements "activates the brain for optimal storage and retrieval of information",[177] and are designed to "integrate body and mind" in order to improve "concentration, memory, reading, writing, organizing, listening, physical coordination, and more."[178] Its theoretical foundation has been discredited by the scientific community, which describe it as pseudoscience.[179][180][181][182] Peer reviewed scientific studies into Brain Gym have found no significant improvement in general academic skills. Its claimed results have been put down to the placebo effect and the benefits of breaks and exercise. Its founder, Paul Dennison, has admitted that many of Brain Gym's claims are not based on good science, but on his "hunches".[183]
  • Chiropractic is an alternative medicine practice focused on finding vertebral subluxations and treating them with spinal adjustments. Many modern chiropractors target solely mechanical dysfunction, and offer health and lifestyle counseling.[184][185] Many others, however, base their practice on the vitalism of D.D. Palmer and B. J. Palmer, maintaining that all or many organic diseases are the result of hypothetical spinal dysfunctions known as vertebral subluxations and the impaired flow of Innate intelligence, a form of putative energy.[186][187] These ideas are not based in science, and along with the lack of a strong research base are in part responsible for the historical conflict between chiropractic and mainstream medicine.[188][189][190][191] Recent systematic reviews indicate the possibility of moderate effectiveness for spinal manipulation in the management of nonspecific low back pain.[192][193][194] The effectiveness of chiropractic spinal manipulation has not been demonstrated according to the principles of evidence-based medicine for any other condition.[195] Adverse symptomatic events, which are all qualified as relatively mild in the referenced report, with possible neurologic involvement following spinal manipulation, particularly upper spinal manipulation, occur with a frequency of between 33% and 61%. Most events are minor, such as mild soreness, fainting, dizziness, light headedness, headache, or numbness or tingling in the upper limbs; serious complications such as subarachnoid hemorrhage, vertebral artery dissection, or myelopathy are observed infrequently.[196][197][198][199][200]
  • Innate intelligence – form of putative energy, the flow of which is considered by some chiropractors to be responsible for patient health. Chiropractic historian Joseph C. Keating, Jr., PhD. stated: "So long as we propound the 'One cause, one cure' rhetoric of Innate, we should expect to be met by ridicule from the wider health science community. Chiropractors can’t have it both ways. Our theories cannot be both dogmatically held vitalistic constructs and be scientific at the same time. The purposiveness, consciousness and rigidity of the Palmers’ Innate should be rejected."[201]
  • Vertebral subluxation – a Chiropractic term that describes variously a site of impaired flow of innate or a spinal lesion that is postulated to cause neuromusculoskeletal or visceral dysfunction. Scientific consensus does not support the existence of chiropractic's vertebral subluxation.[202]
  • Colon cleansing (colonics, colon hydrotherapy) – encompasses several alternative medical therapies intended to remove fecal waste and unidentified toxins from the colon and intestinal tract. Practitioners believe that accumulations of putrefied feces line the walls of the large intestine and that they harbor parasites or pathogenic gut flora, causing nonspecific symptoms and general ill-health. This "auto-intoxication" hypothesis is based on medical beliefs of the Ancient Egyptians and Greeks, and was discredited in the early 20th century.[203][204]
  • Craniosacral therapy – involves the therapist placing their hands on the patient, which allows them to "tune into the craniosacral rhythm".[205] Craniosacral therapists claim to treat mental stress, neck and back pain, migraines, temporomandibular joint dysfunction, and for chronic pain conditions such as fibromyalgia.[206][207][208] A systematic review conducted in 1999 "did not find valid scientific evidence that craniosacral therapy provides a benefit to patients", noting that "[t]he available health outcome research consists of low grade of evidence derived from weak study designs" and "[a]dverse events have been reported in head-injured patients following craniosacral therapy."[209] Craniosacral therapy has been variously characterized as pseudoscientific or discredited.[210][211][212][213][214][215]
  • Crystal healing – belief that crystals have healing properties. Once common among pre-scientific and indigenous peoples, it enjoyed a resurgence in popularity in the 1970s with the New Age movement.[216][217]
  • Detoxification – Detoxification in the context of alternative medicine consists of an approach that claims to rid the body of "toxins" – accumulated harmful substances that allegedly exert undesirable effects on individual health in the short or long term. Many mainstream media web sites offer articles on this practice, despite a lack of scientific evidence for either the presence of the toxins, harm from their presence, or efficacy of the removal techniques.
  • Ear candling – an alternative medicine practice claimed to improve general health and well-being by lighting one end of a hollow candle and placing the other end in the ear canal. Medical research has shown that the practice is ineffective, with a relatively low probability of injury. A survey of 122 otolaryngologists identifying encountering 21 ear injuries in total over the course of their careers.[218] and does not help remove earwax or toxicants.[219]
  • Earthing therapy or Grounding – a therapy that is claimed to ease pain, provide a better nights sleep, and assist in diseases with symptoms of inflammation by being in direct physical contact with the ground or a device connected to electrical ground.[220] Purportedly, the earth has an excess of electrons which people are missing due to insulating shoes and ground cover. Being in electrical contact with the earth provides the body with those excess electrons which then act as antioxidants.[221]
  • Electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) – reported sensitivity to electric and magnetic fields or electromagnetic radiation of various frequencies at exposure levels well below established safety standards. Symptoms are inconsistent, but can include headache, fatigue, difficulty sleeping, and similar non-specific indications.[222] Provocation studies find that the discomfort of sufferers is unrelated to hidden sources of radiation,[223][224] and "no scientific basis currently exists for a connection between EHS and exposure to [electromagnetic fields]."[225]
  • Faith healing – act of curing disease by such means as prayer and laying on of hands. No material benefit in excess of that expected by placebo is observed.[6][226][227]
  • Health bracelets and various healing jewelry that are purported to improve the health, heal, or improve the chi of the wearer, such as ionized bracelets, hologram bracelets, and magnetic jewelry. No claims of effectiveness made by manufacturers have ever been substantiated by independent sources.[228][229]
  • Homeopathy – the belief that giving a patient with symptoms of an illness extremely dilute remedies that are thought to produce those same symptoms in healthy people. These preparations are often diluted beyond the point where any treatment molecule is likely to remain.[230] Studies of homeopathic practice have been largely negative or inconclusive.[231][232][233][234] No scientific basis for homeopathic principles has been substantiated.[235][236][237][238][239][240][241]
  • Iridology – means of medical diagnosis which proponents believe can identify and diagnose health problems through close examination of the markings and patterns of the iris. Practitioners divide the iris into 80–90 zones, each of which is connected to a particular body region or organ. This connection has not been scientifically validated, and disorder detection is neither selective nor specific.[242][243][244] Because iris texture is a phenotypical feature which develops during gestation and remains unchanged after birth (which makes the iris useful for Biometrics), Iridology is all but impossible.
  • Leaky gut syndrome – in alternative medicine, a proposed condition caused by the passage of harmful substances outward through the gut wall. It has been proposed as the cause of many conditions including multiple sclerosis and autism, a claim which has been called pseudoscientific.[245] According to the UK National Health Service, the theory is vague and unproven.[246] Some skeptics and scientists say that the marketing of treatments for leaky gut syndrome is either misguided or an instance of deliberate health fraud.[246]
  • Lightning Process – a system claimed to be derived from osteopathy, neuro-linguistic programming (NLP) and life coaching.[247] Proponents claim that the Process can have a positive effect on a long list of diseases and conditions, including myalgic encephalomyelitis, despite no scientific evidence of efficacy.[248] The designer of the Lightning Process, Phill Parker, suggests certain illnesses such as ME/CFS arise from a dysregulation of the Central Nervous System and Autonomic Nervous System, which the Lightning Process aims to address, helping to break the "adrenaline loop" that keep the systems' stress responses high.[248]
  • Magnet therapy – practice of using magnetic fields to positively influence health. While there are legitimate medical uses for magnets and magnetic fields, the field strength used in magnetic therapy is too low to effect any biological change, and the methods used have no scientific validity.[6][249][250]
  • Maharishi Ayurveda – traditional Ayurveda is a 5,000-year-old alternative medical practice with roots in ancient India based on a mind-body set of beliefs.[251][252] Imbalance or stress in an individual’s consciousness is believed to be the reason of diseases.[251] Patients are classified by body types (three doshas, which are considered to control mind-body harmony, determine an individual’s "body type"); and treatment is aimed at restoring balance to the mind-body system.[251][252] It has long been the main traditional system of health care in India,[252] and it has become institutionalized in India's colleges and schools, although unlicensed practitioners are common.[253] As with other traditional knowledge, much of it was lost; in the West, current practice is in part based on the teachings of Maharishi Mahesh Yogi in the 1980s,[254] who mixed it with Transcendental Meditation; other forms of Ayurveda exist as well. The most notable advocate of Ayurveda in America is Deepak Chopra, who claims that Maharishi's Ayurveda is based on quantum mysticism.[254]
  • Naturopathy, or Naturopathic Medicine, is a type of alternative medicine based on a belief in vitalism, which posits that a special energy called vital energy or vital force guides bodily processes such as metabolism, reproduction, growth, and adaptation.[255] Naturopathy has been characterized as pseudoscience.[256][257] It has particularly been criticized for its unproven, disproven, or dangerous treatments.[258][259][260][261] Natural methods and chemicals are not necessarily safer or more effective than artificial or synthetic ones; any treatment capable of eliciting an effect may also have deleterious side effects.[204][257][262][263]
  • Osteopathic manipulative medicine (OMM) or osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) – the core technique of osteopathic medicine. OMM is based on a philosophy devised by Andrew Taylor Still (1828–1917) who held that the body had self-regulating mechanisms that could be harnessed through manipulating the bones, tendons and muscles. It has been proposed as a treatment for a number of human ailments including Parkinson's disease, pancreatitis, and pneumonia but has only been found to be effective for lower back pain by virtue of the spinal manipulation used.[264][265][266] It has long been regarded as rooted in "pseudoscientific dogma".[267] In 2010 Steven Salzberg referred to the OMT-specific training given by colleges of osteopathic medicine as "training in pseudoscientific practices".[268]
  • Radionics – means of medical diagnosis and therapy which proponents believe can diagnose and remedy health problems using various frequencies in a putative energy field coupled to the practitioner's electronic device. The first such "black box" devices were designed and promoted by Albert Abrams, and were definitively proven useless by an independent investigation commissioned by Scientific American in 1924.[269] The internal circuitry of radionics devices is often obfuscated and irrelevant, leading proponents to conjecture dowsing and ESP as operating principles.[270][271][272] Similar devices continue to be marketed under various names, though none is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration; there is no scientific evidence for the efficacy or underlying premise of radionics devices.[273][274] The radionics of Albert Abrams and his intellectual descendants should not be confused with similarly named reputable and legitimate companies, products, or medical treatments such as radiotherapy or radiofrequency ablation.
  • Reflexology, or zone therapy, is an alternative medicine involving the physical act of applying pressure to the feet, hands, or ears with specific thumb, finger, and hand techniques without the use of oil or lotion. It is based on what reflexologists claim to be a system of zones and reflex areas that they say reflect an image of the body on the feet and hands, with the premise that such work effects a physical change to the body.[275] A 2009 systematic review of randomised controlled trials concludes that the best evidence available to date does not demonstrate convincingly that reflexology is an effective treatment for any medical condition.[276] There is no consensus among reflexologists on how reflexology is supposed to work; a unifying theme is the idea that areas on the foot correspond to areas of the body, and that by manipulating these one can improve health through one's qi.[277] Reflexologists divide the body into ten equal vertical zones, five on the right and five on the left.[278] Concerns have been raised by medical professionals that treating potentially serious illnesses with reflexology, which has no proven efficacy, could delay the seeking of appropriate medical treatment.[279]
  • Therapeutic touch – form of vitalism where a practitioner, who may be also a nurse,[52][280] passes his or her hands over and around a patient to "realign" or "rebalance" a putative energy field.[50] A recent Cochrane Review concluded that "[t]here is no evidence that [Therapeutic Touch] promotes healing of acute wounds."[281] No biophysical basis for such an energy field has been found.[282][283]
  • Tin foil hat – A tin foil hat is a hat made from one or more sheets of aluminium foil, or a piece of conventional headgear lined with foil, worn in the belief it shields the brain from threats such as electromagnetic fields, mind control, and mind reading. At this time no link has been established between the radio-frequency EMR that tin foil hats are meant to protect against and subsequent ill health.
  • Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM)traditional medical system originating in China and practiced as an alternative medicine throughout much of the world. It contains elements based in the cosmology of Taoism,[284] and considers the human body more in functional and vitalistic than anatomical terms.[285][286] Health and illness in TCM follow the principle of yin and yang, and are ascribed to balance or imbalance in the flow of a vital force, qi.[287][288] Diagnostic methods are solely external, including pulse examination at six points, examination of a patient's tongue, and a patient interview; interpractitioner diagnostic agreement is poor.[285][289][290][291] The TCM description of the function and structure of the human body is fundamentally different from modern medicine, though some of the procedures and remedies have shown promise under scientific investigation.[287][292]
  • Acupuncture – use of fine needles to stimulate acupuncture points and balance the flow of qi. There is no known anatomical or histological basis for the existence of acupuncture points or meridians.[289][293] Some acupuncturists regard them as functional rather than structural entities, useful in guiding evaluation and care of patients.[287][294][295] Dry needling is the therapeutic insertion of fine needles without regard to TCM knowledge. Acupuncture has been the subject of active scientific research since the late 20th century,[296] and its effects and application remain controversial among medical researchers and clinicians.[296] Because it is a procedure rather than a pill, the design of controlled studies is challenging, as with surgical and other procedures.[287][296][297][298][299] Some scholarly reviews conclude that acupuncture's effects are mainly placebo,[300][301] and others find likelihood of efficacy for particular conditions.[296][302][303][304]
  • Acupressuremanual non-invasive stimulation of acupuncture points.[305]
  • Acupuncture points or acupoints – collection of several hundred points on the body lying along meridians. According to TCM, each corresponds to a particular organ or function.[305]
  • Cupping therapy – an ancient Chinese form of alternative medicine in which a local suction is created on the skin; practitioners believe this mobilizes blood flow in order to promote healing.[306] Suction is created using heat (fire) or mechanical devices (hand or electrical pumps). Only one controlled trial of cupping has been conducted, and it did not demonstrate any effectiveness for pain relief. A book by Simon Singh and Edzard Ernst claims that no evidence exists of any beneficial effects of cupping for any medical condition.[307]
  • Meridians – are the channels through which qi flows, connecting the several zang-fu organ pairs.[285][308] There is no known anatomical or histological basis for the existence of acupuncture points or meridians.[289][293]
  • Moxibustion – application on or above the skin of smoldering mugwort, or moxa, to stimulate acupuncture points.
  • Qivital energy whose flow must be balanced for health. Qi has never been directly observed, and is unrelated to the concept of energy used in science.[309][310][311]
  • TCM materia medica – a collection of crude medicines used in Traditional Chinese medicine. These include many plants in part or whole, such as ginseng and wolfberry, as well as more exotic ingredients such as seahorses. Preparations generally include several ingredients in combination, with selection based on physical characteristics such as taste or shape, or relationship to the organs of TCM.[312] Most preparations have not been rigorously evaluated or give no indication of efficacy.[292][313][314] Pharmacognosy research for potential active ingredients present in these preparations is active, though the applications do not always correspond to those of TCM.[315]
  • Zang-fu – concept of organs as functional yin and yang entities for the storage and manipulation of qi.[285] These organs are not based in anatomy.
  • Urine therapy – drinking either one's own undiluted urine or homeopathic potions of urine for treatment of a wide variety of diseases is based on pseudoscience.[316]
  • Promotion of a link between autism and vaccines, in which the vaccines are accused of causing autism-spectrum conditions, triggering them, or aggravating them, has been characterized as pseudoscience.[317] Many epidemiological studies have found a lack of association between either the MMR vaccine and autism, or thimerosal-containing vaccines and autism.[318] Consequently, the Institute of Medicine has concluded that there is no causal link between either of these varieties of vaccines and autism.[319]
  • Vitalism – doctrine that the processes of life are not explicable by the laws of physics and chemistry alone and that life is in some part self-determining. The book Encyclopedia of Pseudoscience stated "today, vitalism is one of the ideas that form the basis for many pseudoscientific health systems that claim that illnesses are caused by a disturbance or imbalance of the body's vital force." "Vitalists claim to be scientific, but in fact they reject the scientific method with its basic postulates of cause and effect and of provability. They often regard subjective experience to be more valid than objective material reality."[320]


Social sciences

  • Classical social evolution: Before Darwin's work On the Origin of Species, some models incorporated Enlightenment ideas of social progress, and thus, according to philosopher of science Michael Ruse, were pseudoscientific by current standards, and may have been viewed as such during the 18th century, as well as into the start of the 19th century (though the word pseudoscience may not have been used in reference to these early proposals). This pseudoscientific, and often political, incorporation of social progress with evolutionary thought continued for some one hundred years following the publication of Origin of Species.[330][331]
  • Marxism: Philosopher Sir Karl Popper argued that Marxism had been initially scientific, in that Karl Marx had postulated economic and social hypotheses which were genuinely predictive. When Marx's predictions were not in fact borne out, Popper argues that the theory was saved from falsification by the addition of ad hoc hypotheses which attempted to make it compatible with the facts. By this means a theory which was initially genuinely scientific degenerated into pseudo-scientific dogma.[332][333] Sociologist Ernest van den Haag also characterized Marxism as a pseudoscience.[334]

Racial theories

  • Aryanism, the claim that there is a distinct "Aryan race" which is superior to other putative races,[337] was an important tenet of Nazism, and "the basis of the German government policy of exterminating Jews, Gypsies, and other 'non-Aryans.'"[338]
  • Drapetomania, was a supposed mental illness described by American physician Samuel A. Cartwright in 1851 that caused black slaves to flee captivity.
  • Melanin theory – belief founded in the distortion of known physical properties of melanin, a natural polymer, that posits the inherent superiority of dark-skinned people and the essential inhumanity and an inferiority of light-skinned people.[339][340]

Paranormal and ufology

Paranormal subjects[13][17][235][341] have been subject to critiques from a wide range of sources including the following claims of paranormal significance:


  • Fomenko's chronology – argues that the conventional chronology is fundamentally flawed, that events attributed to antiquity such as the histories of Rome, Greece and Egypt actually occurred during the Middle Ages.
  • Confederate revisionists (AKA "Civil War revisionists") and Neo-Confederates argue that the Confederate States of America was the defender, rather than the instigator, of the American Civil War, and that the Confederacy's motivation was the maintenance of states rights and limited government rather than the preservation and expansion of slavery.[367][368][369]
  • Holocaust denial – The Leuchter report attempted to demonstrate on a forensic level that mass homicidal gassings at Nazi extermination camps did not take place.


Religious and spiritual beliefs

Spiritual and religious practices and beliefs, according to astronomer Carl Sagan, are normally not classified as pseudoscience.[375] However, religion can sometimes nurture pseudoscience, and "at the extremes it is difficult to distinguish pseudoscience from rigid, doctrinaire religion", and some religions might be confused with pseudoscience, such as traditional meditation.[375] The following religious/spiritual items have been related to or classified as pseudoscience in some way:

  • Koranic scientific foreknowledge (Islam) – Koranic Science (or Qur'anic science or Hadeeth science) asserts that foundational Islamic religious texts made accurate statements about the world that science verified hundreds of years later. This belief is a common theme in Bucailleism.[376]
  • Christian Science is generally considered a Christian new religious movement. However, some have called it "pseudoscience" because its founder, Mary Baker Eddy, used "science" in its name, and because of its former stance against medical science. Also, "Eddy used the term Metaphysical science to distinguish her system both from materialistic science and from occult science."[377] The church now accepts the use of medical science. Vaccinations were banned, but in 1901, Eddy, at the age of 80, advised her followers to submit to them.[378]

Creation science

Creation science or scientific creationism, the belief that the origin of everything in the universe is the result of a first cause, brought about by a creator deity, and that this thesis is supported by geological, biological, and other scientific evidence.[379]

  • Creationist cosmologies – cosmologies which, among other things, allow for a universe that is only thousands of years old.[328]
  • Baraminology – taxonomic system that classifies animals into groups called "created kinds" or "baramins" according to the account of creation in the book of Genesis and other parts of the Bible.[380]
  • Creation biology – subset of creation science that tries to explain biology without macroevolution.[381]
  • Flood geology – creationist form of geology that advocates most of the geologic features on Earth are explainable by a global flood.[148][271][382][383]
  • Searches for Noah's Ark – attempts to find the burial site of Noah's Ark, that according to the Genesis flood narrative is located somewhere in the alleged "Mountains of Ararat". There have been numerous expeditions with several false claims of success; the practice is widely regarded as pseudoscience, more specifically pseudoarchaeology.[384][385][386][387]
  • Modern geocentrism – citing uniform gamma-ray bursts distribution, and other arguments of this type, as evidence that we (being in the Milky Way galaxy) are at the center of the cosmos.[388][389][390] Proponents got their initial belief from the Bible, then they cherry-pick scientific evidence to justify their position and claim that geocentrism is supported by science.[391]
  • Intelligent design – maintains that "certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection."[392] These features include:[114][393]
  • Irreducible complexity – claim that some biological systems are too complex to have evolved from simpler systems. It is used by proponents of intelligent design to argue that evolution by natural selection alone is incomplete or flawed, and that some additional mechanism (an "Intelligent Designer") is required to explain the origins of life.[394][395][396]
  • Specified complexity – claim that when something is simultaneously complex and specified, one can infer that it was produced by an intelligent cause (i.e., that it was designed) rather than being the result of natural processes.[114][393]


  • Dianetics, a therapeutic technique promoted by Scientology, purports to treat a hypothetical reactive mind. There is no scientific evidence for the existence of an actual reactive mind,[397] apart from the stimulus responsemechanisms documented in behaviorist psychology.
  • Scientology's Purification Rundown and Narconon programs purport to clean the human body of toxins and drugs respectively. Their methodology consists of very long saunas over many days, extremely large (possibly toxic) doses of vitamins including niacin, and Scientology 'training routines', sometimes including attempts at telekenesis. The programmes have been described as "medically unsafe",[398] "quackery"[399][400][401] and "medical fraud",[402] while academic and medical experts have dismissed Narconon's educational programme as containing "factual errors in basic concepts such as physical and mental effects, addiction and even spelling".[403] In turn, Narconon has claimed that mainstream medicine is "biased" against it, and that "people who endorse so-called controlled drug use cannot be trusted to review a program advocating totally drug-free living."[404] Narconon has said that criticism of its programmes is "bigoted",[405] and that its critics are "in favor of drug abuse ... they are either using drugs or selling drugs".[406]


  • Feng shui – ancient Chinese system of mysticism and aesthetics based on astronomy, geography, and the putative flow of qi. It is widely considered a pseudoscience, and has been criticised by many organisations devoted to investigating paranormal claims. Evidence for its effectiveness is based on anecdote, and there is a lack of a plausible method of action; this leads to conflicting advice from different practitioners of feng shui. Feng shui practitioners use this as evidence of variations or different schools; critical analysts have described it thus: "Feng shui has always been based upon mere guesswork."[407][408] Modern criticism differentiates between feng shui as a traditional proto-religion and the modern practice: "A naturalistic belief, it was originally used to find an auspicious dwelling place for a shrine or a tomb. However, over the centuries it... has become distorted and degraded into a gross superstition."[407]
  • Quantum mysticism – builds on a superficial similarity between certain New Age concepts and such seemingly counter-intuitive quantum mechanical concepts as the uncertainty principle, entanglement, and wave–particle duality, while generally ignoring the limitations imposed by quantum decoherence.[6][409][410][411][412] One of the most abused ideas is Bell's theorem, which proves the nonexistence of local hidden variables in quantum mechanics. Despite this, Bell himself rejected mystical interpretations of the theory.[413]

Consumer products

  • Cosmetics and cleaning products frequently make pseudoscientific claims about their products.[414] Claims are made about both the benefits or toxicity of certain products or ingredients. Practices include angel dusting, the addition of minuscule amounts of active ingredients to products which are insufficient to cause any measurable benefit. Examples of products include:
  • Laundry balls – spherical or toroidal objects marketed as soap substitutes for washing machines.[6]

Idiosyncratic ideas

The following concepts have only a very small number of proponents, yet have become notable:

  • Lawsonomy – proposed philosophy and system of claims about physics made by baseball player and aviator Alfred William Lawson.[416]
  • Morphic resonance – The idea put forth by Rupert Sheldrake that "natural systems, such as termite colonies, or pigeons, or orchid plants, or insulin molecules, inherit a collective memory from all previous things of their kind". It is also claimed to be responsible for "mysterious telepathy-type interconnections between organisms".[417]
  • Penta Water – claimed acoustically-induced structural reorganization of liquid water into long-lived small clusters of five molecules each. Neither these clusters nor their asserted benefits to humans have been shown to exist.[418][419]
  • Polywater – hypothetical polymerized form of water proposed in the 1960s with a higher boiling point, lower freezing point, and much higher viscosity than ordinary water. It was later found not to exist, with the anomalous measurements being explained by biological contamination.[420] Chains of molecules of varying length (depending on temperature) tend to form in normal liquid water without changing the freezing or boiling point.[421]
  • Time Cube[422] – a website created by Gene Ray, in 1997, where he sets out his personal model of reality, which he calls Time Cube. He suggests that all of modern physics is wrong,[423] and his Time Cube model proposes that each day is really four separate days occurring simultaneously.[424]
  • Timewave zeronumerological formula that was invented by psychonaut Terence McKenna with the help of the hallucinogenic drug dimethyltryptamine. After discovering 2012 doomsday predictions, he redesigned his formula to have a "zero-point" at the same date as the Mayan longcount calendar.[425][426]
  • Torsion field – hypothetical physical field responsible for ESP, homeopathy, levitation, and other paranormal phenomena.[427]
  • Welteislehre – notion by the Austrian Hanns Hörbiger that ice was the basic substance of all cosmic processes.[428]

See also


  1. 1.0 1.1 Pollak 2002.
  2. O'Neill 2008.
  3. Rosenbaum 2009
  4. Hummels 2009.
  5. Fraknoi, Andrew (October 2009). "Ancient Astronauts and Erich Von Daniken". Astronomical Pseudo-Science: A Skeptic's Resource List. Astronomical Society of the Pacific. Retrieved 2 November 2011.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  6. 6.00 6.01 6.02 6.03 6.04 6.05 6.06 6.07 6.08 6.09 6.10 6.11 6.12 6.13 6.14 6.15 6.16 entry in Shermer, Michael, ed. (2002). The Skeptic Encyclopedia of Pseudoscience (PDF). ABC–CLIO, Inc. ISBN 1-57607-653-9. Retrieved 16 December 2013.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  7. Trefil, James (March 2007). "Who Were the Ancient Engineers of Egypt?". Skeptical Inquirer. Committee for Skeptical Inquiry. 17.1. Retrieved 1 December 2007. The pyramids, as impressive as they are, give no evidence at all for the presence of advanced technology at work in ancient Egypt.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  8. Kilgannon, Corey (8 January 2010). "Origin of the Species, From an Alien View". New York Times. The New York Times Company. Retrieved 29 October 2010. Mr. Sitchin has been called silly before – by scientists, historians and archaeologists who dismiss his theories as pseudoscience and fault their underpinnings: his translations of ancient texts and his understanding of physics.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  9. Carroll, Robert T (1994–2009). "The Skeptic's Dictionary". Zecharia Sitchin and The Earth Chronicles. John Wiley & Sons. Retrieved 29 October 2010.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  10. 10.0 10.1 Fraknoi, Andrew (October 2009). "The Dogon Tribe and Sirius B". Astronomical Pseudo-Science: A Skeptic's Resource List. Astronomical Society of the Pacific. Retrieved 2 November 2011.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  11. "The Universe At Your Fingertips Activity: Activities With Astrology". Astronomical Society of the Pacific. Retrieved 3 December 2007. These activities help students to understand the difference between science and pseudoscience by investigating some of astrology's claims.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  12. 12.0 12.1 "Statement of the position of the Iowa Academy of Science on Pseudoscience" (PDF). Iowa Academy of Science. July 1986. Archived from the original (PDF) on 26 June 2007.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  13. 13.0 13.1 13.2 statement from the Russian Academy of Sciences.[1] Broken Link!
  14. Pollak 2002, "Belief in pseudoscience is relatively widespread... More than 25 percent of the public believes in astrology, that is, that the position of the stars and planets can affect people's lives.
  15. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  16. Fraknoi, Andrew (October 2009). "The Full Moon and Lunacy". Astronomical Pseudo-Science: A Skeptic's Resource List. Astronomical Society of the Pacific. Retrieved 2 November 2011.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  17. 17.0 17.1 17.2 17.3 17.4 17.5 Fraknoi, Andrew (October 2009). "The "Great Moon Hoax": Did Astronauts Land on the Moon?". Astronomical Pseudo-Science: A Skeptic's Resource List. Astronomical Society of the Pacific. Retrieved 2 November 2011.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  18. Knier, Gil; Bray, Becky (30 March 2001). "The Moon Landing Hoax". NASA. Archived from the original on 22 November 2007. Did we actually send humans to the Moon in the 1960s? Of course we did!<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  19. Schilling, Govert (2009). The Hunt For Planet X: New Worlds and the Fate of Pluto. Copernicus Books. p. 111. ISBN 0-387-77804-7.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  20. Morrison, David (2008). "Armageddon from Planet Nibiru in 2012? Not so fast" (blog). Retrieved 2 April 2009.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  21. Plait, Phil (2003). "The Planet X Saga: Science" (blog). Retrieved 2 April 2009.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  22. Myles Standish (16 July 1992). "Planet X – No dynamical evidence in the optical observations". Astronomical Journal. 105 (5): 200–2006. Retrieved 30 April 2009.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  23. "IISC Paper" (PDF).<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  24. Indian Express Article
  25. Nettleton, Paul (1 September 2005). "Peer Review: Who Built the Moon? by Christopher Knight & Alan Butler". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 5 November 2011.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  26. Angell, Ian O. (1978). "Megalithic mathematics, ancient almanacs or neolithic nonsense". Bull. Inst. Math. Appl. 14 (10): 253–258.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  27. NCSE Tackles Climate Change Denial, National Center for Science Education, January 13th, 2012
  28. Shermer, Michael. What Is Pseudoscience?, Scientific American, September 15, 2011
  29. Morrison, David. The Parameters of Pseudoscience, Skeptical Inquirer, Volume 37.2, March/April 2013. Book review of The Pseudoscience Wars: Immanuel Velikovsky and the Birth of the Modern Fringe, by Michael D. Gordin.
  30. Brown, Michael. Adversaries, zombies and NIPCC climate pseudoscience, ‘’’’, Sep 26, 2013
  31. Plait, Phil. Debunking the Denial: “16 Years of No Global Warming”, ‘’’’, Jan. 14, 2013
  32. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value). Subscription needed
  33. Brown, R. G. E., Jr. (23 October 1996). "Environmental science under siege: Fringe science and the 104th Congress, U. S. House of Representatives" (PDF). Report, Democratic Caucus of the Committee on Science. Washington, D. C.: U. S. House of Representatives.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  34. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  35. Giaever, Ivar (2011-06-26). "De forunderlige klimamytene (The peculiar climate myths)". (in Norwegian). Aftenposten. Archived from the original on 2011-06-26. Retrieved 2013-01-08. <templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  36. Vahrenholt, Fritz (18 Jun 2012). "Global warming: second thoughts of an environmentalist". Retrieved 8 January 2013.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  37. "Pseudoscience on Global Warming". 3 November 2003. Retrieved 8 January 2013.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  38. Ferrara, Peter (28 April 2013). "The Disgraceful Episode Of Lysenkoism Brings Us Global Warming Theory". Forbes. Retrieved 8 January 2013.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  39. Michaels, Patrick J. (12 August 2013). "State-Funded Science: It's Worse Than You Think!". Cato Unbound. Retrieved 8 January 2013.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  40. Morano, Marc (2009-03-17). "U.S. Senate Minority Report Update: More Than 700 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims". U.S. Senate Environment and Public Works Committee (Minority). Archived from the original on 2011-06-26. Retrieved 2013-01-08.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  41. Thomas, Friedman (30 November, 2009). "Global Weirding Is Here". New York Times. Retrieved 31 December, 2013. Check date values in: |accessdate=, |date= (help)<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  42. "Lysenkoism". Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  43. Sterling, Bruce (June 2004). "Suicide by Pseudoscience". 12 (6). Wired Magazine. Retrieved 19 November 2011.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  44. Walker, Bruce (30 November 2009). "The Ghost of Lysenko". American Thinker.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  45. Russell, Jeffrey B. "The Myth of the Flat Earth". American Scientific Affiliation. Retrieved March 14, 2007.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  46. Sagan, Carl. Does truth matter? (PDF). pp. 8–9. Archived from the original (PDF) on 26 June 2008. [text of proclamation] activities of superstition and ignorance have been growing, and antiscience and pseudoscience cases have become frequent. Therefore, effective measures must be applied as soon as possible to strengthen public education in science.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  47. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  48. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  49. Morrison, Chris (21 October 2008). "Blacklight Power bolsters its impossible claims of a new renewable energy source". New York Times.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  50. 50.0 50.1 50.2 50.3 50.4 "Scientific American".<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>[dead link]
  51. Gardner, M (May–June 1998). "Zero Point Energy and Harold Puthoff". Skeptical Inquirer: 13. On the misuse of some physics ideas and cosmology.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  52. 52.0 52.1 52.2 52.3 52.4 "Beyond Science", on season 8 , episode 2 of Scientific American Frontiers.
  53. Ball, Philip (14 September 2007). "Burning water and other myths". Nature News. Retrieved 19 August 2008.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  54. Olsen, Brad. Future Esoteric: The Unseen Realms. CCC Publishing. p. 326.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  55. Narlikar, Jayant V. (2009). "Astronomy, pseudoscience and rational thinking". In Percy, John; Pasachoff, Jay. Teaching and Learning Astronomy: Effective Strategies for Educators Worldwide. Cambridge University Press. p. 165.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  56. Quack, Johannes (2012). Disenchanting India: Organized Rationalism and Criticism of Religion in India. Oxford University Press. p. 170. Retrieved 15 August 2015.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  57. Sokal, Alan (2008). Beyond the Hoax: Science, Philosophy and Culture. Oxford University Press. pp. 306–307.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  58. Nanda, Meera (1997). "The Science Wars in India". DISSENT. 44 (1).<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  59. Carezani, Ricardo. "No Neutrinos". Society for the Advancement of Autodynamics. Retrieved 7 February 2008.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  60. Philipkoski, Kristen (13 July 1999). "Shedding Light in the Dark". Wired News. Retrieved 7 February 2008. Mainstream physicists have considered autodynamics a crackpot theory for decades<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>[dead link]
  61. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  62. Preiss, Byron (1985). The Planets. Bantam Books. p. 27. ISBN 0-553-05109-1.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  63. Goode, Jamie (1 March 2006). The science of wine: from vine to glass. University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-24800-7.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>[page needed]
  64. Chalker-Scott, Linda (2004). "The Myth of Biodynamic Agriculture" (PDF). Master Gardener Magazine.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  65. Smith, D. (2006). "On Fertile Ground? Objections to Biodynamics". The World of Fine Wine (archived at Skeptical Inquirer) ( (12): 108–113. Retrieved 29 November 2013.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  66. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  67. Randi, James (16 July 2004). "An Important Appeal". James Randi Educational Foundation. Archived from the original (newsletter) on 8 March 2005. Retrieved 17 November 2007. This is a total quack procedure that has actually killed children.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  68. Maloney, Shannon-Bridget. "Be Wary of Attachment Therapy". Retrieved 17 November 2007.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  69. Berlin, Lisa J.; Ziv, Yair; Amaya-Jackson, Lisa; Greenberg, Mark T. (eds.). "Preface". Enhancing Early Attachments. Theory, Research, Intervention and Policy. Duke series in child development and public policy. Guilford Press. p. xvii. ISBN 1-59385-470-6. <templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  70. 70.0 70.1 Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  71. CESNUR — APA Brief in the Molko Case
  72. American Psychological Association Board of Social and Ethical Responsibility for Psychology (BSERP) (1987-05-11). "Memorandum". CESNUR: APA Memo of 1987 with Enclosures. CESNUR Center for Studies on New Religions. Retrieved 2008-11-18. BSERP thanks the Task Force on Deceptive and Indirect Methods of Persuasion and Control for its service but is unable to accept the report of the Task Force. In general, the report lacks the scientific rigor and evenhanded critical approach necessary for APA imprimatur.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  73. APA memo and two enclosures
  74. Haldeman, Douglas C. (December 1999). "The Pseudo-science of Sexual Orientation Conversion Therapy" (PDF). ANGLES: the Policy Journal of the Institute for Gay and Lesbian Strategic Studies. 4 (1). Retrieved 7 November 2010.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  75. "Position Statement on Therapies Focused on Attempts to Change Sexual Orientation (Reparative or Conversion Therapies)". American Psychiatric Association. May 2000. Archived from the original (PDF) on 10 September 2008. Retrieved 28 August 2007.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  76. "Just the Facts About Sexual Orientation & Youth: A Primer for Principals, Educators and School Personnel" (PDF). Just the Facts Coalition. 1999. Retrieved 14 May 2010.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  77. Glassgold, JM (1 August 2009). "Report of the American Psychological Association Task Force on Appropriate Therapeutic Responses to Sexual Orientation" (PDF). American Psychological Association. Retrieved 24 September 2009.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  78. "Barry Beyerstein Q&A". Ask the Scientists. Scientific American Frontiers. Retrieved 22 February 2008. they simply interpret the way we form these various features on the page in much the same way ancient oracles interpreted the entrails of oxen or smoke in the air. I.e., it's a kind of magical divination or fortune telling where 'like begets like.'<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  79. "The use of graphology as a tool for employee hiring and evaluation". British Columbia Civil Liberties Union. 1988. Retrieved 22 February 2008. On the other hand, in properly controlled, blind studies, where the handwriting samples contain no content that could provide non-graphological information upon which to base a prediction (e.g., a piece copied from a magazine), graphologists do no better than chance at predicting the personality traits<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>[dead link]
  80. National Academy of Science (1999). Science and Creationism: A View from the National Academy of Sciences, 2nd edition. National Academy Press. p. 48.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  81. Thomas, John A. (2002). "Graphology Fact Sheet". North Texas Skeptics. Retrieved 22 February 2008. In summary, then, it seems that graphology as currently practiced is a typical pseudoscience and has no place in character assessment or employment practice. There is no good scientific evidence to justify its use, and the graphologists do not seem about to come up with any.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  82. "Hypnosis". American Cancer Society. Retrieved 25 February 2008.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  83. 83.0 83.1 Westen et al. 2006 "Psychology: Australian and New Zealand edition" John Wiley.
  84. Cathcart, Brian; Wilkie, Tom (18 December 1994). "Hypnotism does not exist, say experts". The Independent. London. Retrieved 31 March 2010.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  85. NICE Guidance for IBS
  86. Nash, Michael R. "The Truth and the Hype of Hypnosis[dead link]". Scientific American: July 2001
  87. Lynn, Steven Jay; Lock, Timothy; Loftus, Elizabeth; Krackow, Elisa; Lilienfeld, Scott O. (2003). "The remembrance of things past: problematic memory recovery techniques in psychotherapy". In Lilienfeld, Scott O.; Lynn, Steven Jay; Lohr, Jeffrey M. Science and Pseudoscience in Psychotherapy. New York: Guilford Press. pp. 219–220. ISBN 1-57230-828-1. Retrieved 25 February 2008.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles> "hypnotically induced past life experiences are rule-governed, goal-directed fantasies that are context generated and sensitive to the demands of the hypnotic regression situation."
  88. "What is Hypnotherapy and How Does it Differ From Hypnosis?". 22 July 2007. Retrieved 28 November 2011.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  89. Robertson, Donald (2009). The Discovery of Hypnosis: The Complete Writings of James Braid, the Father of Hypnotherapy. UKCHH Ltd. p. 15. ISBN 9780956057006.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  90. "Evidence from randomized controlled trials indicates that hypnosis, relaxation, and meditation techniques can reduce anxiety, particularly that related to stressful situations, such as receiving chemotherapy".
  91. 91.0 91.1 Polichak, James W. "Memes as Pseudoscience". In Shermer, Michael. Skeptic Encyclopedia of Pseudoscience. p. 664f. ISBN 9781576076538.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  92. Tosey, P; Mathison, J (2006). "Introducing Neuro-Linguistic Programming" (PDF). Centre for Management Learning & Development, School of Management, University of Surrey.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  93. Dilts, R.; Grinder, J.; Delozier, J.; Bandler, R. (1980). Neuro-Linguistic Programming: Volume I: The Study of the Structure of Subjective Experience. Cupertino, CA: Meta Publications. p. 2. ISBN 0-916990-07-9.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  94. 94.0 94.1 Corballis, MC (1999). "Are we in our right minds?". In Sala, S. Mind Myths: Exploring Popular Assumptions About the Mind and Brain. Wiley, John & Sons. pp. 25–41. ISBN 0-471-98303-9.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  95. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  96. 96.0 96.1 96.2 Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  97. 97.0 97.1 Stollznow, K (2010). "Not-so Linguistic Programming". Skeptic. 15 (4): 7.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  98. 98.0 98.1 Lum, C (2001). Scientific Thinking in Speech and Language Therapy. Psychology Press. p. 16. ISBN 0-8058-4029-X.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  99. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  100. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  101. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  102. 102.0 102.1 Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  103. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  104. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  105. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  106. Norcross,, John C.; Hogan, Thomas P.; Koocher, Gerald P. (2008). Clinician's Guide to Evidence-based Practices. USA: Oxford University Press. p. 198. ISBN 978-0-19-533532-3.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  107. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  108. Schmidt, Helmut (1969). "Clairvoyance Tests with a Machine'". Journal of Parapsychology. 33.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  109. Schmidt, Helmut (1970). "PK Experiments with Animals as Subjects". Journal of Parapsychology. 34.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  110. Schmidt, Helmut (1973). "PK Tests with a High Speed Random Number Generator'". Journal of Parapsychology. 37.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  111. Wooffitt, Robin; Holt, Nicola. Looking In and Speaking Out: Introspection, Consciousness, Communication. Andrews UK Limited. p. 32.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  112. Magendie, F. (1844). "IV". An Elementary Treatise on Human Physiology. Translated by John Revere (5th ed.). New York: Harper. p. 150.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  113. Fodor, J. A. (1983). The Modularity of Mind. MIT Press. pp. 14, 23, 131.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  114. 114.0 114.1 114.2 "ICSU Insight". International Council for Science. 2005. Archived from the original on 2006-07-21.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  115. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  116. Saxe, Leonard; Dougherty, Denise; Cross, Theodore (1983). "Scientific Validity of Polygraph Testing: A Research Review and Evaluation". Washington, D. C.: U.S. Congress Office of Technology Assessment. Retrieved 29 February 2008.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  117. Adelson, R. (July 2004). "Monitor on Psychology – The polygraph in doubt". 35 (7). American Psychological Association: 71. Retrieved 29 February 2008.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  118. Bassett, James. "Polygraph Testing". Retrieved 9 May 2012.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  119. Vergano, Dan (9 September 2002). "Telling the truth about lie detectors". USA Today. Retrieved 9 May 2012.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  120. Primal therapy homepage
  121. Moore, Timothy (2001). "Primal Therapy". Gale Group.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  122. Merkin, Daphne (5 September 2004). "Psychoanalysis: Is It Science or Is It Toast?". New York Times. Retrieved 5 May 2012.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  123. Cioffi, Frank (1985). "Psychoanalysis, Pseudo-Science and Testability". In Currie, Gregory; Musgrave, Alan. Popper and the Human Sciences. Nijhoff International Philosophy Series. SpringerVerlag. pp. 13–44. ISBN 978-90-247-2998-2.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  124. Popper, K. R. (1990). "Science: Conjectures and Refutations". In Grim, P. Philosophy of Science and the Occult. Albany. pp. 104–110.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  125. Cioffi, Frank (1985). "Psychoanalysis, Pseudo-Science and Testability". In Currie, Gregory; Musgrave, Alan. Popper and the human sciences. Springer. ISBN 978-90-247-2998-2.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>. Reprinted in Cioffi, Frank (1998). Freud and the question of pseudoscience. Open Court. ISBN 978-0-8126-9385-0.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  126. "Urban Legends Reference Pages: Business (Subliminal Advertising)". The Urban Legends Reference Pages. Retrieved 11 August 2006.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  127. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  128. 128.0 128.1 128.2 "Science and Technology: Public Attitudes and Public Understanding. Science Fiction and Pseudoscience". National Science Foundation.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  129. 129.0 129.1 Frean, Alexandra (30 January 2009). "Universities drop degree courses in alternative medicine". The Times. Retrieved 5 November 2012. (Subscription required (help)). Universities are increasingly turning their backs on homoeopathy and complementary medicine amid opposition from the scientific community to 'pseudo-science' degrees.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  130. Corbyn., Zoë (24 April 2008). "Experts criticise 'pseudo-scientific' complementary medicine degrees". Times Higher Education. Retrieved 29 May 2015.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  131. Highfield, Roger (22 March 2007). "Alternative medicine degrees 'anti-scientific'". The Daily Telegraph. London. Retrieved 11 May 2012.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  132. von Rohra, E.; Pampallonab, S.; van Wegberga, B.; Hürnyc, Ch.; Bernhardd, J.; Heussere, P.; Cernyf, Th. (2000). "Experiences in the realisation of a research project on anthroposophical medicine in patients with advanced cancer" (PDF). Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 130 (34): 1173–84. PMID 11013920.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  133. Klotter, Jule (2006). "Anthroposophical Medicine". Townsend Letter for Doctors and Patients. 24 (1): 274.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  134. Kiene, Helmut (2001). Complementary Methodology in Clinical Research – Cognition-based Medicine. Heidelberg, New York: Springer Publishers. ISBN 3-540-41022-8.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  135. anonymous. "Miscellaneous Holistic Remedies". Holistic Online. Retrieved 9 February 2008.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  136. Anonymous (13 November 2004). "The Position of Anthroposophic Medicine". Internationale Vereinigung Anthroposophischer Ärztegesellschaften (International Federation of Anthroposophic Medical Associations). Archived from the original on 22 February 2008. Retrieved 9 February 2008. Some medicines are similar to herbal medicinal products, some are prepared according to the guidelines of homeopathic pharmacopoeias.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  137. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  138. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  139. Klotter, Jule (May 2006). "Anthroposophic lifestyle & allergies in children.(Shorts)". Townsend Letter for Doctors and Patients. 24 (2): 274.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  140. 140.0 140.1 Carroll, Robert. "anthroposophic medicine". Skeptic's Dictionary. Retrieved 9 February 2008.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  141. Hansson, Sven Ove (1991). "Is Anthroposophy Science?". Conceptus. XXV (64): 37–49. The claims that anthroposophy is a science are not justified.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  142. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  143. Ernst, Edzard, "Anthroposophical Medicine: A systematic review of randomised clinical trials." Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift, ISSN 0043-5325, 2004, vol. 116, no4, pp. 128–130
  144. "Report of the Special Commission on Complementary and Alternative Medical Practitioners, In Opposition to the Licensure of Naturopaths" (PDF). Massachusetts Medical Society. Retrieved 27 January 2008. Many of the means by which naturopaths diagnose these toxins and allergies are outright quackery: electrodiagnostic devices (banned by the FDA as worthless), hair analysis, applied kinesiology, iridology, and more.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  145. 145.0 145.1 "Applied Kinesiology". American Cancer Society. 23 May 2007. Retrieved 27 January 2008. Available scientific evidence does not support the claim that applied kinesiology can diagnose or treat cancer or other illness.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  146. "Applied Kinesiology". Natural Standard. 1 July 2005. Retrieved 27 January 2008. applied kinesiology has not been shown to be effective for the diagnosis or treatment of any disease.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  147. "Applied Kinesiology Status Statement". International College of Applied Kinesiology. 16 June 1992. Archived from the original on 22 March 2008. Retrieved 27 January 2008.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  148. 148.0 148.1 Such as the existence of the geologic column; see Morton, Glenn. "The Geologic Column and its Implications for the Flood". TalkOrigins Archive.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  149. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  150. Gerez, IF; Shek, LP; Chng, HH; Lee, BW (January 2010). "Diagnostic tests for food allergy" (PDF). Singapore Medical Journal. 51 (1): 4–9. PMID 20200768.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  151. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  152. Wüthrich, B (2005). "Unproven techniques in allergy diagnosis" (PDF). Journal of Investigational Allergology & Clinical Immunology. 15 (2): 86–90. PMID 16047707.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  153. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  154. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  155. 155.0 155.1 Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  156. 156.0 156.1 Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  157. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  158. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  159. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  160. 160.0 160.1 160.2 "Unorthodox techniques for the diagnosis and treatment of allergy, asthma and immune disorders". Australasian Society of Clinical Immunology and Allergy. November 2007. Archived from the original on 28 December 2011. Retrieved 7 February 2012.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  161. Motala, C; Hawarden, D (July 2009). "Guideline: Diagnostic testing in allergy" (PDF). South African Medical Journal. 99 (7): 531–535.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  162. Morris, A. (March 2006). "Complementary and Alternative Allergy Tests". Current Allergy & Clinical Immunology. 19 (1): 26–28.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  163. Peter Barrett (2004), Science and Theology Since Copernicus: The Search for Understanding, p. 18, Continuum International Publishing Group, ISBN 0-567-08969-X.
  164. Quackenbush, Thomas R. (2000). Better Eyesight The complete magazines of William H. Bates. North Atlantic Books. p. 643. ISBN 1-55643-351-4.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  165. Worrall, Russell S.; Nevyas, Jacob; Barrett, Stephen (12 September 2007). "Eye-Related Quackery". Retrieved 17 November 2007. The claims Bates made in advertising his book were so dubious that in 1929 the Federal Trade Commission issued a complaint against him for advertising "falsely or misleadingly"<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  166. Pollack, P. (1956). "Chapter 3: Fallacies of the Bates System". The Truth about Eye Exercises. Philadelphia: Chilton Co.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  167. Skarnulis, Leanna (5 February 2007). "Natural Vision Correction: Does It Work?". WebMD. No evidence was found that visual training had any effect on the progression of nearsightedness, or that it improved visual function for patients with farsightedness or astigmatism, or that it improved vision lost to diseases, including age-related macular degeneration, glaucoma, or diabetic retinopathy.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  168. Gardner, Martin (1957). "Chapter 19: Throw Away Your Glasses". Fads and Fallacies in the Name of Science. Courier Dover. pp. 230–241. ISBN 0-486-20394-8. Actually, Bates' theory of accommodation (so necessary to explain the value of his exercises) is so patently absurd that even most of his present-day followers have discarded it.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  169. Bradley, Robyn E. (23 September 2003). "Advocates See Only Benefits From Eye Exercises" (PDF). The Boston Globe (MA).<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>[dead link]
  170. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  171. Randi, James (11 November 2006). "Swift: the weekly newsletter of the JREF". Archived from the original on 16 October 2007. Retrieved 17 November 2007. This is pure old quackery, it’s wishful thinking, and it’s profitable.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  172. "Biological Rhythms: Implications for the Worker". OTA-BA-463 Box 2-A pg. 30. Office of Technology Assessment. September 1991. Retrieved 21 February 2008. "No evidence exists to support the concept of biorhythms; in fact, scientific data refute their existence.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  173. Carroll, Robert Todd. "Biorhythms". Skeptic's Dictionary. Retrieved 21 February 2008. The theory of biorhythms is a pseudoscientific theory that claims our daily lives are significantly affected by rhythmic cycles overlooked by scientists who study biological rhythms.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  174. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  175. 175.0 175.1 Smith, SE (1993). "Body Memories: And Other Pseudo-Scientific Notions of "Survivor Psychology"". Issues in Child Abuse Accusations. 5 (4).<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  176. Lilienfeld, Scott O.; Lynn, SJ; Lohr, JM, eds. (2002). Science and Pseudoscience in Clinical Psychology. The Guilford Press. ISBN 1-57230-828-1.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  177. "Brain Gym – FAQ". The Official Brain Gym Web Site. Retrieved 11 August 2008. BRAIN GYM works by facilitating optimal achievement of mental potential through specific movement experiences. All acts of speech, hearing, vision, and coordination are learned through a complex repertoire of movements. BRAIN GYM promotes efficient communication among the many nerve cells and functional centers located throughout the brain and sensory motor system.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  178. "About Brain Gym".<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  179. "Neuroscience and Education: Issues and Opportunities" (PDF). the ESRC's Teaching and Learning Research Programme. Retrieved 3 August 2007. The pseudo-scientific terms that are used to explain how this works, let alone the concepts they express, are unrecognisable within the domain of neuroscience.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  180. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).(subscription required)
  181. "Sense About Science – Brain Gym". Sense About Science. Retrieved 11 April 2008. These exercises are being taught with pseudoscientific explanations that undermine science teaching and mislead children about how their bodies work. ... There have been a few peer reviewed scientific studies into the methods of Brain Gym, but none of them found a significant improvement in general academic skills.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  182. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).(subscription required)
  183. Gray, Sadie (5 April 2008). "News in brief". London: The Times. Retrieved 1 September 2008. Paul Dennison, a Californian educator who created the programme, admitted that many claims in his teacher’s guide were based on his 'hunches' and were not proper science.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  184. "An Introduction to Chiropractic". National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health. November 2007. Retrieved 6 January 2009.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  185. "Standards for Doctor of Chiropractic programs and requirements for institutional status" (PDF). The Council on Chiropractic Education. 2007. Archived from the original (PDF) on 16 February 2008. Retrieved 14 February 2008.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  186. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  187. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  188. Keating, JC Jr; Cleveland, CS III; Menke, M (2005). "Chiropractic history: a primer" (PDF). Association for the History of Chiropractic. Retrieved 16 June 2008.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>[dead link]
  189. Keating, JC Jr (1997). "Chiropractic: science and antiscience and pseudoscience side by side". Skept Inq. 21 (4): 37–43.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  190. Johnson, T. (December 1999). "Angry scientists fight university's attempt to affiliate with chiropractic college". Canadian Medical Association Journal. 160: 99–100.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  191. "First public chiropractic school causes stir". MSNBC. 17 January 2005. Retrieved 7 November 2010.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  192. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  193. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  194. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  195. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  196. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  197. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  198. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  199. Barrett, Stephen (31 July 2008). "Chiropractic's Dirty Secret: Neck Manipulation and Strokes". Quackwatch. Retrieved 6 January 2009.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  200. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  201. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  202. "Chiropractic: A Profession Seeking Identity". CSICOP. Archived from the original on 4 October 2009. Retrieved 7 January 2009.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  203. Barrett, S (9 March 2008). "Gastrointestinal Quackery: Colonics, Laxatives, and More". Quackwatch. Retrieved 2 September 2008.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  204. 204.0 204.1 "ACS: Colon Therapy". Retrieved 7 December 2008.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  205. "The Craniosacral Therapy Association of the UK".<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  206. "Craniosacral Therapy". The Upledger Institute. 2001. Retrieved 27 March 2004.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>[dead link]
  207. Ferrett, Mij (1998). "What Is Craniosacral Therapy?". Retrieved 27 March 2004.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  208. "General information on Cranial Osteopathy". The Sutherland Society. Retrieved 24 January 2006.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>[dead link]
  209. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value). An earlier version of the paper is available without a subscription: Green, C; Martin, CW; Bassett, K; Kazanjian, A (1999). "A systematic review and critical appraisal of the scientific evidence on craniosacral therapy" (PDF). BCOHTA 99:1J. British Columbia Office of Health Technology Assessment. Retrieved 8 October 2007.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>[dead link]
  210. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  211. Wheeler, Thomas J. (21 February 2006). "A Scientific Look at Alternative Medicine" (PDF). Retrieved 12 January 2012.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  212. Bledsoe, Bryan E. (1 October 2004). "The Elephant in the Room: Does OMT Have Proved Benefit?". JAOA: Journal of the American Osteopathic Association. 104 (10): 405–406. PMID 15537794. Retrieved 12 January 2012.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>[dead link]
  213. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  214. "Cranial Manipulative Therapy". Retrieved 12 January 2012.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  215. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  216. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  217. Carroll, Robert Todd. "crystal power". The Skeptic's Dictionary. Retrieved 28 July 2007.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  218. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  219. Beatty M.D., Charles W. "Ear Candling: Is it Safe?". Mayo Clinic. Retrieved 7 June 2014.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  220. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  221. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  222. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  223. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  224. Goldacre, Ben. "Electrosensitives: the new cash cow of the woo industry". BadScience/The Guardian. Retrieved 17 November 2007.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  225. "Electromagnetic fields and public health". Retrieved 17 November 2007.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>[dead link]
  226. National Science Foundation (2002). Science and Engineering Indicators – 2002. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. pp. ch. 7. ISBN 978-0-16-066579-0.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles> "Belief in pseudoscience is relatively widespread... Polls also show that one quarter to more than half of the public believes in ... faith healing."
  227. Frazier, Kendrick (January 2005). "In the Land of Galileo, Fifth World Skeptics Congress Solves Mysteries, Champions Scientific Outlook". Skeptical Inquirer. Committee for Skeptical Inquiry. Archived from the original on 17 October 2007. Retrieved 18 December 2007. The majority of rigorous trials show no effect beyond placebo. (Edzard Ernst)<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  228. Copper and Magnetic Bracelets Do Not Work for Rheumatoid Arthritis;
  229. Quackwear: Big Pseudoscience Wants to Sell You Wearable Metal to Improve Your Health; Alternet; January 10, 2015.
  230. Kayne, SB; Caldwell, IM (2006). Homeopathic pharmacy: theory and practice (2nd. ed.). Elsevier Health Sciences. p. 52. ISBN 9780443101601.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  231. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  232. "Homoeopathy's benefit questioned". BBC News. 25 August 2005. Retrieved 30 January 2008. Professor Egger said: "We acknowledge to prove a negative is impossible. "But good large studies of homeopathy do not show a difference between the placebo and the homoeopathic remedy, whereas in the case of conventional medicines you still see an effect."<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  233. "Homeopathy: systematic review of systematic reviews". Bandolier. Retrieved 30 January 2008. None of these systematic reviews provided any convincing evidence that homeopathy was effective for any condition. The lesson was often that the best designed trials had the most negative result<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  234. "Questions and Answers About Homeopathy". National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health. April 2003. Retrieved 30 January 2008. In sum, systematic reviews have not found homeopathy to be a definitively proven treatment for any medical condition.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  235. 235.0 235.1 Beyerstein, BL (1997). "Distinguishing Science from Pseudoscience" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 11 July 2007. Retrieved 14 July 2007.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  236. CSICOP, cited in National Science Foundation Subcommittee on Science & Engineering Indicators (2000). "Science and Technology: Public Attitudes and Public Understanding: Science Fiction and Pseudoscience". National Science Foundation. Retrieved 13 July 2007.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  237. "NCAHF Position Paper on Homeopathy". National Council Against Health Fraud. 1994. Retrieved 14 July 2007.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  238. Tyler, Chris (September 2006). "Sense About Homeopathy" (PDF). Sense About Science. Retrieved 29 January 2008. The scientific evidence shows that homeopathy acts only as a placebo and there is no scientific explanation of how it could work any other way.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  239. "Questions and Answers About Homeopathy". National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health. April 2003. Retrieved 30 January 2008. a number of its key concepts do not follow the laws of science (particularly chemistry and physics)<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  240. "What is Homeopathy". American Cancer Society. 5 January 2000. Archived from the original on 20 January 2008. Retrieved 30 January 2008. Most scientists say homeopathic remedies are basically water and can act only as placebos.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  241. "Scientists attack homeopathy move". BBC News. 25 October 2006. Retrieved 2 February 2008. In a statement, the Royal College of Pathologists said they were "deeply alarmed" that the regulation of medicine had "moved away from science and clear information for the public"<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  242. "Iridology". Natural Standard. 7 July 2005. Retrieved 1 February 2008. "Research suggests that iridology is not an effective method to diagnose or help treat any specific medical condition.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>[dead link]
  243. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  244. "H-175.998 Evaluation of Iridology" (PDF). American Medical Association. Retrieved 30 July 2009. Our AMA believes that iridology, the study of the iris of the human eye, has not yet been established as having any merit as a diagnostic technique.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  245. Kalichman, Seth C. (16 January 2009). Denying AIDS: Conspiracy Theories, Pseudoscience, and Human Tragedy. Springer. p. 167. ISBN 978-0-387-79476-1.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  246. 246.0 246.1 "Leaky gut syndrome". NHS Choices. 9 April 2013. Retrieved 24 October 2013.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  247. Cormier, Zoe (2008-03-08). "'Talk Therapy' Takes On Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: Coming Soon To Canada". The Globe and Mail. Toronto. Retrieved 2011-05-25.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  248. 248.0 248.1 Felstein, Roma (2007-01-09). "Could ME be caused by too much adrenaline?". The Daily Mail. London.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  249. Park, Robert L. (2000). "The Virtual Astronaut". Voodoo Science: The Road from Foolishness to Fraud. New York, New York: Oxford University Press. p. 61. ISBN 0-19-513515-6. Not only are magnetic fields of no value in healing, you might characterize these as "homeopathic" magnetic fields.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  250. National Science Foundation (2002). "7". Science and Engineering Indicators – 2002. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. ISBN 978-0-16-066579-0. Among all who had heard of [magnet therapy], 14 percent said it was very scientific and another 54 percent said it was sort of scientific. Only 25 percent of those surveyed answered correctly, that is, that it is not at all scientific.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  251. 251.0 251.1 251.2 "Report 12 of the Council on Scientific Affairs (A-97)". American Medical Association. 1997.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>[dead link]
  252. 252.0 252.1 252.2 "Ayurvedic medicine". Quackwatch. Retrieved 16 August 2008.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  253. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  254. 254.0 254.1 Carroll, Robert Todd (2003). The Skeptic's Dictionary. John Wiley and Sons. pp. 45–4?. ISBN 0-471-27242-6.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  255. Sarris, J., and Wardle, J. 2010. Clinical naturopathy: an evidence-based guide to practice. Elsevier Australia. Chatswood, NSW.
  256. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  257. 257.0 257.1 Barrett S (23 December 2003). "A close look at naturopathy". Retrieved 20 November 2012.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  258. McKnight, P (2009-03-07). "Naturopathy's main article of faith cannot be validated: Reliance on vital forces leaves its practises based on beliefs without scientific backing". Vancouver Sun. Retrieved 2009-03-21.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>[dead link]
  259. National Science Board (April 2002). "Science and Technology: Public Attitudes and Public Understanding – Science Fiction and Pseudoscience". Science and engineering indicators. Arlington, Virginia: National Science Foundation Directorate for Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  260. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  261. "Iridology is nonsense".<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>, a web page with further references
  262. Carroll, Robert. "Natural". The Skeptic's Dictionary. Retrieved 2009-03-21.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  263. "NCAHF Position Paper on Over the Counter Herbal Remedies (1995)". National Council Against Health Fraud. 1995. Retrieved 2009-04-17.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  264. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  265. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  266. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  267. Guglielmo, WJ (1998). "Are D.O.s losing their unique identity?". Medical economics. 75 (8): 200–2, 207–10, 213–4. PMID 10179479.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  268. Salzberg, Steven (27 October 2010). "Osteopathic Physicians Versus Doctors". Forbes. Retrieved 15 September 2013.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  269. Pilkington, Mark (15 April 2004). "A vibe for radionics". London: The Guardian. Retrieved 7 February 2008. Scientific American concluded: 'At best, [ERA] is all an illusion. At worst, it is a colossal fraud.'<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  270. Radionic Association, cited by BBC (23 May 2006). "10 lesser-known alternative therapies". British Broadcasting Corporation. Retrieved 7 February 2008. Radionics is a technique of healing using extrasensory perception (ESP) and an instrument.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  271. 271.0 271.1 Isaak, Mark (ed.). "Index to Creationist Claims: Geology". TalkOrigins Archive.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  272. "What is Radionics". The Radionic Association. Archived from the original on 15 January 2008. Retrieved 7 February 2008. This subtle field cannot be accessed using our conventional senses. Radionic practitioners use a specialised dowsing technique to both identify the sources of weakness in the field and to select specific treatments to overcome them.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  273. "Electromagnetic Therapy". American Cancer Society. Retrieved 6 February 2008. There is no relationship between the conventional medical uses of electromagnetic energy and the alternative devices or methods that use externally applied electrical forces. Available scientific evidence does not support claims that these alternative electrical devices are effective in diagnosing or treating cancer or any other disease.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  274. Helwig, David (December 2004). "Radionics". In Longe, Jacqueline L. The Gale Encyclopedia of Alternative Medicine. Gale Cengage. ISBN 978-0-7876-7424-3. Retrieved 7 February 2008.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  275. Kunz, Kevin; Kunz, Barbara (1993). The Complete Guide to Foot Reflexology. Reflexology Research Project.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  276. Ernst E (2009). "Is reflexology an effective intervention? A systematic review of randomised controlled trials". Med J Aust. 191 (5): 263–6. PMID 19740047.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  277. Norman, Laura; Thomas Cowan (1989). The Reflexology Handbook, A Complete Guide. Piatkus. pp. 22, 23. ISBN 0-86188-912-6.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  278. "Natural Standard". Harvard Medical School. July 7, 2005. Retrieved January 27, 2007.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  279. "Reflexology". National Council Against Health Fraud. 1996. Retrieved 2007-01-27.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  280. Wallace, Sampson; Vaughn, Lewis (24 March 1998). ""Therapeutic Touch" Fails a Rare Scientific Test". CSICOP News. Committee for Skeptical Inquiry. Archived from the original on 13 October 2007. Retrieved 5 December 2007. Despite this lack of evidence, TT is now supported by major nursing organizations such as the National League of Nurses and the American Nurses Association.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  281. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  282. Courcey, Kevin. "Further Notes on Therapeutic Touch". Quackwatch. Retrieved 5 December 2007. What's missing from all of this, of course, is any statement by Krieger and her disciples about how the existence of their energy field can be demonstrated by scientifically accepted methods.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  283. "Energy Medicine: An Overview". National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health. 24 October 2007. Retrieved 5 December 2007. neither the external energy fields nor their therapeutic effects have been demonstrated convincingly by any biophysical means.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  284. Unschuld, Paul Ulrich (1985). Medicine in China: A History of Ideas. University of California Press. ISBN 0-520-06216-7.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  285. 285.0 285.1 285.2 285.3 "Traditional Chinese Medicine: Principles of Diagnosis and Treatment". Complementary/Integrative Medicine Therapies. The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. Retrieved 12 February 2009.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  286. "The Roots of Qi". CSICOP. Retrieved 12 February 2009.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  287. 287.0 287.1 287.2 287.3 NIH Consensus Development Program (3–5 November 1997). "Acupuncture --Consensus Development Conference Statement". National Institutes of Health. Retrieved 17 July 2007.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  288. Barrett, Stephen (30 December 2007). "Be Wary of Acupuncture, Qigong, and "Chinese Medicine"". Quackwatch. Retrieved 4 January 2009.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  289. 289.0 289.1 289.2 "NCAHF Position Paper on Acupuncture (1990)". National Council Against Health Fraud. 16 September 1990. Retrieved 30 December 2007.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  290. Maciocia, Giovanni (1989). The Foundations of Chinese Medicine. Churchill Livingstone. ISBN 0-443-03980-1.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  291. Barrett, Stephen (28 March 2008). "Why TCM Diagnosis Is Worthless". Acupuncture Watch. Retrieved 16 February 2009.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  292. 292.0 292.1 "Traditional Medicine and Pseudoscience in China: A Report of the Second CSICOP Delegation (Part 1)". CSICOP. Retrieved 12 February 2009.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>[dead link]
  293. 293.0 293.1 Mann, Felix (1996). Reinventing Acupuncture: A New Concept of Ancient Medicine. London: Butterworth Heinemann,. p. 14. ...acupuncture points are no more real than the black spots that a drunkard sees in front of his eyes.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  294. Kaptchuk (1983). unknown. pp. 34–35.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  295. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  296. 296.0 296.1 296.2 296.3 Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  297. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  298. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  299. Committee on the Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine by the American Public (2005). "Complementary and Alternative Medicine in the United States". National Academies Press. p. 126.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  300. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  301. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  302. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  303. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  304. "Acupuncture: Review and Analysis of Reports on Controlled Clinical Trials Section 3" (PDF). World Health Organization. 2003.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  305. 305.0 305.1 NIH Consensus statement: "Despite considerable efforts to understand the anatomy and physiology of the "acupuncture points", the definition and characterization of these points remains controversial. Even more elusive is the basis of some of the key traditional Eastern medical concepts such as the circulation of Qi, the meridian system, and the five phases theory, which are difficult to reconcile with contemporary biomedical information but continue to play an important role in the evaluation of patients and the formulation of treatment in acupuncture." Acupuncture. National Institutes of Health: Consensus Development Conference Statement, 3–5 November 1997. Available online at Retrieved 30 January 2007.
  306. "British Cupping Society". Retrieved 2008. Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  307. Singh, Simon; Ernst, Edzard (2008). Trick or Treatment. Transworld Publishers. p. 368. ISBN 9780552157629.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  308. "Definition of Chinese meridian theory". National Cancer Institute. Retrieved 16 February 2009.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  309. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  310. Stenger, Victor J. (June 1998). "Reality Check: the energy fields of life". Skeptical Briefs. Committee for Skeptical Inquiry. Archived from the original on 11 December 2007. Retrieved 25 December 2007.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles> "Despite complete scientific rejection, the concept of a special biological fields within living things remains deeply engraved in human thinking. It is now working its way into modern health care systems, as non-scientific alternative therapies become increasingly popular. From acupuncture to homeopathy and therapeutic touch, the claim is made that healing can be brought about by the proper adjustment of a person's or animal's "bioenergetic fields.""
  311. "Traditional Medicine and Pseudoscience in China: A Report of the Second CSICOP Delegation (Part 2)". CSICOP. Retrieved 15 February 2009.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>[dead link]
  312. "Traditional Chinese Medicine: Overview of Herbal Medicines". Complementary/Integrative Medicine Therapies. The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. Retrieved 12 February 2009.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  313. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  314. Praities, Nigel (7 August 2008). "GPs warned over Chinese medicine". Pulse. Retrieved 16 February 2009.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>[dead link]
  315. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  316. Gardner, Martin (2001). Did Adam and Eve Have Navels?: Debunking Pseudoscience. New York: W.W. Norton & Company. pp. 92–101. ISBN 0-393-32238-6.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  317. Garofalo, Pat (12 July 2013). "Jenny McCarthy's Pseudoscience Has No Place on 'The View'". US News. Retrieved 13 March 2014.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  318. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  319. Immunization Safety Review Committee, Board on Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Institute of Medicine (2004). Immunization Safety Review: Vaccines and Autism. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. ISBN 0-309-09237-X. <templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  320. Williams, William A. (2000). Encyclopedia of pseudoscience. New York: Facts on File. ISBN 0-8160-3351-X.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  321. Kirkpatrick and Dahlquist. Technical Analysis: The Complete Resource for Financial Market Technicians. Financial Times Press, 2006, page 3. ISBN 0-13-153113-1
  322. Beating the Quants at Their Own Game — SPDR S&P 500 Trust ETF (NYSEARCA:SPY) | Seeking Alpha
  323. [2][dead link]
  324. Highs and Lows: A Behavioral and Technical Analysis by Bruce Mizrach, Susan Weerts :: SSRN
  325. Paul V. Azzopardi (2010). Behavioural Technical Analysis: An introduction to behavioural finance and its role in technical analysis. Harriman House. ISBN 1905641419.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  326. Andrew W. Lo; Jasmina Hasanhodzic (2010). The Evolution of Technical Analysis: Financial Prediction from Babylonian Tablets to Bloomberg Terminals. Bloomberg Press. p. 150. ISBN 1576603490. Retrieved 8 August 2011.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  327. Paulos, J.A. (2003). A Mathematician Plays the Stock Market. Basic Books.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  328. 328.0 328.1 Griffioen, Technical Analysis in Financial Markets
  329. Fama, Eugene (May 1970). "Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work," The Journal of Finance, v. 25 (2), pp. 383-417.
  330. Ruse, Michael (2013). "Evolution". In Pigliucci, Massimo; Boudry, Maarten. Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem. University of Chicago Press. pp. 239–243. ISBN 022605182X. For the first one hundred and fifty years evolution was -- and was seen to be -- a pseudoscience.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  331. Pigliucci, Massimo (April 2011). "Evolution as pseudoscience?". Ruse’s somewhat surprising yet intriguing claim is that "before Charles Darwin, evolution was an epiphenomenon of the ideology of [social] progress, a pseudoscience and seen as such..."<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  332. Popper, Karl (1963). Science as Falsification
  333. Thornton, Stephen (2006). "Karl Popper". In Zolta, Edward N. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Accessed 14 December 2015
  334. Haag, Ernest van den (1987). Marxism as Pseudoscience Reason Papers No. 12, Spring 1987
  335. Gould, Stephen Jay (19). The Mismeasure of Man. W W Norton and Co. ISBN 0-393-01489-4. Few tragedies can be more extensive than the stunting of life, few injustices deeper than the denial of an opportunity to strive or even to hope, by a limit imposed from without, but falsely identified as lying within. Check date values in: |year= (help)<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  336. Kurtz, Paul (Sep 2004). "Can the Sciences Help Us to Make Wise Ethical Judgments?". Skeptical Inquirer Magazine. Committee for Skeptical Inquiry. Archived from the original on 23 November 2007. Retrieved 1 December 2007. There have been abundant illustrations of pseudoscientific theories-monocausal theories of human behavior that were hailed as "scientific"-that have been applied with disastrous results. Examples: ... Many racists today point to IQ to justify a menial role for blacks in society and their opposition to affirmative action.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  337. Regal, Brian. 2009. Pseudoscience: a critical encyclopedia Greenwood Press. pp. 27-29
  338. Encyclopaedia Britannica: Aryan. "This notion, which had been repudiated by anthropologists by the second quarter of the 20th century, was seized upon by Adolf Hitler and the Nazis and made the basis of the German government policy of exterminating Jews, Gypsies, and other 'non-Aryans.'".
  339. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  340. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  341. 341.0 341.1 Pollak 2000.
  342. Mann, Johathan (30 August 2002). "They call it cerealogy". Insight. Retrieved 4 December 2011.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  343. Prothero, Donald R.; Buell, Carl Dennis (2007). Evolution. New York: Columbia University Press. p. 13. ISBN 978-0-231-13962-5.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  344. Shermer, Michael; Linse, Pat (2002). The Skeptic Encyclopedia of Pseudoscience. ISBN 1-57607-653-9.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  345. "Parapsychological Association website, Glossary of Key Words Frequently Used in Parapsychology". Retrieved 24 January 2006.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  346. Alcock, James E. "Electronic Voice Phenomena:Voices of the Dead?". Committee for Skeptical Inquiry. Retrieved 8 March 2007.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  347. Carroll, Robert Todd (2003). The Skeptic's Dictionary. Wiley Publishing Company. ISBN 0-471-27242-6.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  348. Shermer, Michael (May 2005). "Turn Me On, Dead Man". Scientific American. Retrieved 28 February 2007.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  349. Hines, Terrence (1988). Pseudoscience and the Paranormal: A Critical Examination of the Evidence. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books. ISBN 0-87975-419-2. Thagard (1978) op cit 223 ff<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  350. "Parapsychological Association website, Glossary of Key Words Frequently Used in Parapsychology". Retrieved 24 December 2006.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  351. extrasensory perception. Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  352. National Science Foundation (2002). Science and Engineering Indicators – 2002. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. pp. ch. 7. ISBN 978-0-16-066579-0. Belief in pseudoscience is relatively widespread... At least half of the public believes in the existence of extrasensory perception (ESP).<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  353. According to skeptical investigator Joe Nickell, the typical ghost hunter is practicing pseudoscience.Ettkin, Brian (27 October 2008). "Skeptic: Ghost hunters practice 'pseudoscience'". Albany Times-Union. Retrieved 14 December 2009.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>[dead link]
  354. "Levitation". Skeptic's Dictionary.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  355. Vernon, David (1989). "Palmistry". In Laycock, Donald; Vernon, David; Groves, Colin; Brown, Simon. Skeptical – a Handbook of Pseudoscience and the Paranormal. Canberra: Imagecraft. p. 44. ISBN 0-7316-5794-2. <templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  356. Randi, James (1989). The Faith Healers. Prometheus Books. ISBN 0-87975-535-0.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  357. Vernon, David (1989). Laycock, Donald; Vernon, David; Groves, Colin; Brown, Simon, eds. Skeptical – a Handbook of Pseudoscience and the Paranormal. Canberra: Imagecraft. p. 47. ISBN 0-7316-5794-2. <templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  358. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  359. Carroll, Robert Todd. "Psychic Surgery". The Skeptic's Dictionary. Retrieved 28 July 2007.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  360. "Psychic surgeon charged". The Filipino Reporter. 17–23 June 2005. Retrieved 28 July 2007.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  361. Vyse, Stuart A. (1997). Believing in Magic: The Psychology of Superstition. Oxford University Press US. p. 129. ISBN 0-19-513634-9. [M]ost scientists, both psychologists and physicists, agree that it has yet to be convincingly demonstrated.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  362. Carroll, Robert Todd. "Rumplogy for Dummies". The Skeptic's Dictionary.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  363. Stableford, Brian M (2006). Science fact and science fiction: an encyclopedia. New York: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-97460-7.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  364. "Russian Alien Spaceship Claims Raise Eyebrows, Skepticism", Robert Roy Britt,
  365. The Universe. LIFE Science Library. LIFE. 1970.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  366. National Science Foundation (2002). Science and Engineering Indicators – 2002. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. pp. ch. 7. ISBN 9780756723699. Belief in pseudoscience is relatively widespread... A sizable minority of the public believes in UFOs and that aliens have landed on Earth.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  367. David Barton (December 2008). "Confronting Civil War Revisionism: Why the South Went To War". Wall Builders. Retrieved 30 December 2013.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  368. Barrett Brown (27 December 2010). "Neoconfederate civil war revisionism: Those who commemorate the South's fallen heroes are entitled to do so, but not to deny that slavery was the war's prime cause". Retrieved 30 December 2013.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  369. "Howard Swint: Confederate revisionism warps U.S. history". Charleston Daily Mail. June 15, 2011. Retrieved 30 December 2013.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  370. Webb, John (2001). "Feminist Numerology". Science in Africa. Retrieved 27 May 2013.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>[dead link]
  371. Underwood Dudley (1997). Numerology. MAA. ISBN 0-88385-507-0.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  372. Carroll RT (2009-02-23). "neuro-linguistic programming (NLP)". The Skeptic's Dictionary. Retrieved 2009-06-25.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  373. Lynne Kelly (2004). The Skeptic's Guide To The Paranormal. Allen & Unwin. ISBN 1-74114-059-5.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  374. R. Edwin, Sherman (2004). Bible Code Bombshell: Compelling Scientific Evidence That God Authored the Bible. Green Forest, AR: New Leaf Press. pp. 95–109. ISBN 978-1418493264.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  375. 375.0 375.1 Sagan, Carl (1996). "Does Truth Matter? Science, Pseudoscience, and Civilization" (PDF). Skeptical Inquirer.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>[dead link]
  376. Parkins, Michael D.; Szekrenyes, J. (March 2001). "Pharmacological Practices of Ancient Egypt" (PDF). Proceedings of the 10th Annual History of Medicine. Retrieved 7 November 2010.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>[dead link]
  377. Religious outsiders and the making of Americans Robert Laurence Moore; Oxford University Press 1986, page 223
  378. Gottschalk, S. (1973). "The Emergence of Christian Science in American Religious Life". University of California Press. p. 224.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  379. Fraknoi, Andrew (October 2009). "Astronomical Aspects of Creationism and Intelligent Design". Astronomical Pseudo-Science: A Skeptic's Resource List. Astronomical Society of the Pacific. Retrieved 2 November 2011.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  380. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  381. National Academy of Science (1999), Science and Creationism: A View from the National Academy of Sciences, 2nd edition, National Academy Press, archived from the original on 2007-07-09<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  382. Young, Davis A. (1995). The biblical Flood: a case study of the Church's response to extrabiblical evidence. Grand Rapids, Mich: Eerdmans. p. 340. ISBN 0-8028-0719-4. Retrieved 16 September 2008.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  383. Isaak, Mark (2007). "Creationist claim CD750". p. 173. Much geological evidence is incompatible with catastrophic plate tectonics.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  384. Fagan, Brian M.; Beck, Charlotte (1996). The Oxford Companion to Archaeology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0195076184. Retrieved January 17, 2014.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  385. Cline, Eric H. (2009). Biblical Archaeology: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0199741077. Retrieved January 17, 2014.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  386. Feder, Kenneth L. (2010). Encyclopedia of Dubious Archaeology: From Atlantis to the Walam Olum. Santa Barbara, California: ABC-CLIO. ISBN 031337919X. Retrieved January 17, 2014.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  387. Rickard, Bob; Michell, John (2000). "Arkeology". Unexplained Phenomena: A Rough Guide Special. London: Rough Guides. pp. 179–183. ISBN 1858285895.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  388. "The TWiT Netcast Network with Leo Laporte" (vlog). 2010.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  389. "21st Century Geocentrism".<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  390. "Podcast #270 — September 15th, 2010".<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  391. Phil Plait (September 14, 2010). "Geocentrism? Seriously?".<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  392. "Questions About Intelligent Design: What is the theory of intelligent design?". Discovery Institute, Center for Science and Culture. The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  393. 393.0 393.1 Jones, John (2005). "Ruling, Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, Conclusion". In making this determination, we have addressed the seminal question of whether ID is science. We have concluded that it is not, and moreover that ID cannot uncouple itself from its creationist, and thus religious, antecedents.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  394. "We therefore find that Professor Behe’s claim for irreducible complexity has been refuted in peer-reviewed research papers and has been rejected by the scientific community at large." Ruling, Judge John E. Jones III, Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District
  395. Shulman, Seth (2006). Undermining science: suppression and distortion in the Bush Administration. Berkeley: University of California Press. p. 13. ISBN 0-520-24702-7. True in this latest creationist variant, advocates of so-called intelligent design ... use more slick, pseudoscientific language. They talk about things like 'irreducible complexity' ... For most members of the mainstream scientific community, ID is not a scientific theory, but a creationist pseudoscience.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles> Mu, David (Fall 2005). "Trojan Horse or Legitimate Science: Deconstructing the Debate over Intelligent Design" (PDF). Harvard Science Review. 19 (1). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2007-07-24.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
    Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  396. Decker., Mark D. "Frequently Asked Questions About the Texas Science Textbook Adoption Controversy". College of Biological Sciences, General Biology Program, University of Minnesota. The Discovery Institute and ID proponents have a number of goals that they hope to achieve using disingenuous and mendacious methods of marketing, publicity, and political persuasion. They do not practice real science because that takes too long, but mainly because this method requires that one have actual evidence and logical reasons for one's conclusions, and the ID proponents just don't have those. If they had such resources, they would use them, and not the disreputable methods they actually use.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  397. Gardner, Martin (1957). "Chapter 22". Fads and Fallacies in the Name of Science. Dover Publications Inc. ISBN 0-486-20394-8.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  398. Farley, Robert (30 March 2003). "Detox center seeks acceptance". St Petersburg Times. When Narconon opened its Chilocco facility in 1991, the Oklahoma Board of Mental Health issued a blistering assessment in denying its application for certification. "There is no credible evidence establishing the effectiveness of the Narconon program to its patients," the board concluded. It attacked the program as medically unsafe; dismissed the sauna program as unproven; and criticized Narconon for inappropriately taking some patients off prescribed psychiatric medication.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  399. Robert W. Welkos; Joel Sappell (27 June 1990). "Church Seeks Influence in Schools, Business, Science". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 13 September 2012. A fourth article did not mention Hubbard by name, but reported favorably on Narconon, his drug and alcohol rehabilitation program, which is run by Scientologists.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  400. Kyle Smith (20 April 2007). "DON'T BE TRICKED BY $CI-FI TOM-FOOLERY". New York Post. Those who want a tan from his celebrity glow will urge a fair hearing for his quackery. Obscure City Councilman Hiram Monserrate suddenly finds himself talked about after issuing a proclamation of huzzahs for L. Ron Hubbard. Three: The Ground Zero maladies are so baffling that workers will try anything. Anyone who feels better will credit any placebo at hand – whether Cruise or the Easter Bunny. In 1991, Time called Scientology's anti-drug program "Narconon" a "vehicle for drawing addicts into the cult" – which the magazine said "invented hundreds of goods and services for which members are urged to give up 'donations' " – such as $1,250 for advice on "moving swiftly up the Bridge" of enlightenment. That's New Age techno-gobbledygook for advice on buying swiftly up the Bridge of Brooklyn. Scientology fronts such as the New York Rescue Workers Detoxification Project – its Web site immediately recognizable as the work of Hubbardites by its logo, which looks like the cover of a Robert Heinlein paperback from 1971 – hint that their gimmicks might possibly interest anyone dreaming of weight loss, higher I.Q. or freedom from addiction. And you might be extra-specially interested if you've faced heart disease, cancer, Agent Orange or Chernobyl. As Mayor Bloomberg put it, Scientology "is not science." Nope. It's science fiction.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  401. "30 arrested in Paris crackdown on Scientologists". Agence France-Presse. 14 January 1992. About 30 Scientologists were arrested – and 19 of them later indicted – between May and October 1990 on charges of fraud, conspiracy to defraud and the illegal practice of medicine following the 1988 suicide of a church member in Lyon, eastern France. ... The sect has often found itself in trouble with officialdom the world over, accused of defrauding and brainwashing followers and, in France, of quackery at its illegal anti-drug clinics called "Narconon."<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  402. Abgrall, Jean-Marie (2001). Healing Or Stealing?: Medical Charlatans in the New Age. p. 193. ISBN 1-892941-51-1. Retrieved 24 September 2012. Narconon, a subsidiary of Scientology, and the association "Yes to Life, No to Drugs" have also made a specialty of the fight against drugs and treating drug addicts. ... Drug addicts are just one of the Scientologists’ targets for recruitment. The offer of care and healing through techniques derived from dianetics is only a come-on. The detoxification of the patient by means of "dianetics purification" is more a matter of manipulation, through the general weakening that it causes; it is a way of brainwashing the subject. Frequently convicted for illegal practice of medicine, violence, fraud and slander, the Scientologists have more and more trouble getting people to accept their techniques as effective health measures, as they like to claim. They recommend their purification processes to eliminate X-rays and nuclear radiation, and to treat goiter and warts, hypertension and psoriasis, hemorrhoids and myopia. . . why would anyone find that hard to swallow? Scientology has built a library of several hundreds of volumes of writings exalting the effects of purification, and its disciples spew propaganda based on irresponsible medical writings by doctors who are more interested in the support provided by Scientology than in their patients’ well-being. On the other hand, responsible scientific reviews have long since "eliminated" dianetics and purification from the lists of therapies – relegating them to the great bazaar of medical fraud. ... Medical charlatans do not base their claims on scientific proof but, quite to the contrary, on peremptory assertions – the kind of assertions that they challenge when they come out of the mouths of those who defend "real" medicine.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  403. Asimov, Nanette (2 October 2004). "Church's drug program flunks S.F. test / Panel of experts finds Scientology's Narconon lectures outdated, inaccurate". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved 7 September 2012. The program, Narconon Drug Prevention & Education, "often exemplifies the outdated, non-evidence-based and sometimes factually inaccurate approach, which has not served students well for decades," concluded Steve Heilig, director of health and education for the San Francisco Medical Society. In his letter to Trish Bascom, director of health programs for the San Francisco Unified School District, Heilig said five independent experts in the field of drug abuse had helped him evaluate Narconon's curriculum. ... "One of our reviewers opined that 'this (curriculum) reads like a high school science paper pieced together from the Internet, and not very well at that,' " Heilig wrote Bascom. "Another wrote that 'my comments will be brief, as this proposal hardly merits detailed analysis.' Another stated, 'As a parent, I would not want my child to participate in this kind of 'education.' " Heilig's team evaluated Narconon against a recent study by Rodney Skager, a professor emeritus at UCLA's Graduate School of Education and Information Studies, describing what good anti-drug programs should offer students. "We concurred that ... the Narconon materials focus on some topics of lesser importance to the exclusion of best knowledge and practices," Heilig wrote, and that the curriculum contained "factual errors in basic concepts such as physical and mental effects, addiction and even spelling."<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  404. Asimov, Nanette (27 March 2005). "Doctors back schools dropping flawed antidrug program". San Francisco Chronicle. The California Medical Association has declared unanimous support for school districts that have dropped Narconon and other "factually inaccurate approaches" to antidrug instruction from their classrooms, and will urge the American Medical Association to do the same. Nearly 500 California doctors also endorsed "scientifically based drug education in California schools"<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  405. "Families question Scientology-linked drug rehab after recent deaths". NBC Rock Center. 16 August 2012. Retrieved 2012-09-03.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  406. "Town Welcomes, Then Questions a Drug Project". New York Times. The New York Times Company. 1989-07-17. p. A13.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  407. 407.0 407.1 Dukes, Edwin Joshua (1971). The Encyclopædia of Religion and Ethics,. Edinburgh: T & T Clark. p. 834.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  408. Vierra, Monty (March 1997). "Harried by "Hellions" in Taiwan" (newsletter). Sceptical Briefs.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  409. Park, Robert L (2000). p. 39. ISBN 9780198604433. [People] long to be told that modern science validates the teachings of some ancient scripture or New Age guru. The purveyors of pseudoscience have been quick to exploit their ambivalence.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  410. Stenger, Victor J. (January 1997). "Quantum Quackery". Skeptical Inquirer. Archived from the original on 17 January 2008. Retrieved 7 February 2008. Capra's book was an inspiration for the New Age, and "quantum" became a buzzword used to buttress the trendy, pseudoscientific spirituality that characterizes this movement.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  411. Gell-Mann, Murray (1995). The Quark and the Jaguar: Adventures in the Simple and Complex. Macmillan. p. 168. ISBN 0-8050-7253-5. Then the conclusion has been drawn that quantum mechanics permits faster-than-light communication, and even tha claimed "paranormal" phenomena like precognition are thereby made respectable! How can this have happened?<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  412. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  413. Bell, J. S. (1988). Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge University Press. p. 170. ISBN 0-521-52338-9. So I think it is not right to tell the public that a central role for conscious mind is integrated into modern atomic physics. Or that 'information' is the real stuff of physical theory. It seems to me irresponsible to suggest that technical features of contemporary theory were anticipated by the saints of ancient religions ... by introspection.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  414. "cosmetics – Bad Science" (blog).<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  415. McLaughlin, Martyn (20 December 2007). "Pseudo science can't cover up the ugly truth". The Scotsman. Edinburgh.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  416. Martin Gardner (1957). Fads And Fallacies In The Name Of Science. Dover Publications. pp. 69–79. ISBN 978-0-486-20394-2.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  417. Shermer, Michael. "Rupert's Resonance". Scientific American. Retrieved 13 Jul 2013.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  418. Goldacre, Ben (27 January 2005). "Testing the water". The Guardian. London: Guardian News and Media, Ltd. Retrieved 29 April 2008.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  419. Water Cluster Quackery. The junk science of structure-altered waters, Stephen Lower
  420. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 47: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
  421. Pang, Xiao-Feng; Feng, Yuan-Ping (Jan 1, 2005). Quantum Mechanics in Nonlinear Systems. World Scientific. p. 579. ISBN 9789812567789. Retrieved 25 March 2015.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  422. The Time Cube: Absolute Proof?
  423. Dvorak, John C. (December 22, 2003). "Don't Call Them Crackpots". PC magazine.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  424. "Truth is cubic?", by Kate Duffy,The Phoenix, Swarthmore College, September 19, 2002. Archived by the Internet Archive, archive copy retrieved July 25, 2010.
  425. Dynamics of Hyperspace
  426. The Timewave: The Zero Date
  427. Kruglyakov, Edward P. "Pseudoscience. How Does It Threaten Science and the Public? Report at a RAN Presidium meeting of 27 May 2003". Zdraviy Smysl. Saint Petersburg Branch of the Russian Humanist Society.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  428. Science gone wrong[dead link]


Further reading

  • Park, Robert (2000). Voodoo Science: The Road from Foolishness to Fraud. Oxford University Press. p. 240. ISBN 978-0195147100.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  • Singer, Barry; Abell, George O. (1983). Science and the paranormal: probing the existence of the supernatural. New York: Scribner. ISBN 0-684-17820-6. <templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  • Collins, Paul (2002). Banvard's folly: thirteen tales of people who didn't change the world. New York: Picador USA. ISBN 0-312-30033-6.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  • Gardner, Martin (1957). Fads and Fallacies in the Name of Science (2nd, revised & expanded ed.). Mineola, New York: Dover Publications. ISBN 0-486-20394-8. Retrieved 14 November 2010  Originally published 1952 by G.P. Putnam's Sons, under the title In the Name of Science<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  • Gardner, Martin (1981). Science – good, bad and bogus. Buffalo, N.Y: Prometheus Books. ISBN 0-87975-144-4.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  • Randi, James (1982). Flim-flam!: psychics, ESP, unicorns, and other delusions. Buffalo, N.Y: Prometheus Books. ISBN 0-87975-198-3.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  • Sagan, Carl (1997). The demon-haunted world: science as a candle in the dark. New York: Ballantine Books. ISBN 0-345-40946-9.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  • Vaughn, Lewis; Schick, Theodore (1999). How to think about weird things: critical thinking for a new age. Mountain View, Calif: Mayfield Pub. ISBN 0-7674-0013-5. <templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  • Shermer, Michael (2002). Why people believe weird things: pseudoscience, superstition, and other confusions of our time. New York: A.W.H. Freeman/Owl Book. ISBN 0-8050-7089-3.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>

External links