Messiah ben Joseph

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search

In Jewish eschatology Messiah ben Joseph (Heb.: משיח בן־יוסף, Mašīaḥ ben Yōsēf), also known as Messiah bar/ben Ephraim (Aram./Heb.: משיח בר/בן אפרים), is a mashiach from the tribe of Ephraim and a descendant of Joseph.[1]

Messianic tradition

Jewish tradition alludes to four messianic figures. Called the Four Craftsmen, each will be involved in ushering in the Messianic age. They are mentioned in the Talmud and the Book of Zechariah. Rashi in his commentary on the Talmud gives more details. Rashi explains that Messiah ben Joseph is called a craftsman because he will help rebuild the temple.[2] Nahmanides also commented on Messiah ben Joseph's rebuilding of the temple.[3][4] The roles of the Four Craftsmen are as follows. Elijah will be the herald of the eschaton.[5] If necessary, Messiah ben Joseph will wage war against the evil forces and die in combat with the enemies of God and Israel.[6] According to Saadia Gaon the need for his appearance will depend on the spiritual condition of the Jewish people.[7] In the Sefer Zerubbabel and later writings, after his death a period of great calamities will befall Israel.[6] God will then resurrect the dead and usher in the Messianic Era of universal peace. Messiah ben David will reign as a Jewish king during the period when God will resurrect the dead. With the ascendancy of Rabbinic Judaism the Righteous Priest has largely not been the subject of Jewish messianic speculation.[8]: 87–89 Most Jews believe that the Third Temple will be built during this era.

Sources in chronological order

The Dead Sea Scrolls

While the Dead Sea scrolls do not explicitly refer to a Messiah ben Joseph, a plethora of messianic figures are displayed.

  • The poly-messianic Testimonia text 4Q175 presents a prophet similar to Moses, a messianic figure and a priestly teacher.[8]: 89 The Test contains four testimonium.[9] The fourth testimonium is about Joshua and is generally viewed as non-messianic. However Alan Avery-Peck suggest that given its placement the text concerning Joshua should be read as referencing a war messiah from Ephraim. It is dated to the early 1st century BCE.[8]: 89
  • 1QS lists a Messiah of Israel, a prophet and a priestly Messiah of Aaron.[10] 1QS dates from around 100 BCE.[11]

Gabriel's Revelation

Gabriel's Revelation is a stone tablet. The text is written in ink. The inscription is in a poor state of preservation.[12]: 11–12 The meaning of the legible text is still a matter of scholarship.

The text seems to talk about a messianic figure from Ephraim who will break evil before righteousness by three days.[12]: 43–44 later the text talks about a “prince of princes” a leader of Israel who is killed by the evil king and not properly buried.[12]: 44 the evil king is then miraculously defeated.[12]: 45 the text seems to refer to Jeremiah Chapter 31.[12]: 43 The choice of Ephraim as the linage of the messianic figure described in the text seems to draw on passages in Jeremiah, Zechariah and Hosea.[12]: 48–49 However, Matthias Henze suggest that this figure is not a reference to the Messiah ben Joseph who he believes is a later develop but rather a pseudonym for the Messiah ben David and that Ephraim is simple a metonym in reference to Israel, Israel Knohl disagrees.[12]: 95–96, 108–111

The text seems to be based on a Jewish revolt recorded by Josephus dating from 4 BCE. Both Josephus and Gabriel's Revelation describe three messianic leaders.[12]: 45–46 Based on its dating the text seems to refer to Simon of Peraea one of the three leaders of this revolt.[12]: 47

Testaments of the Twelve Patriarchs

The Testaments of the Twelve Patriarchs, thought by some to be a Christian writing or if Jewish to have had Christian influences.[13] The Testaments of the Twelve Patriarchs is a composition of twelve texts one for each patriarch. The Testament of Benjamin was probably expanded later to include a reference to Messiah ben Joseph by Jewish sources. The Testament of Joseph on the other hand was probably altered by Christians to read that the virgin born Lamb of God from the tribe of Judah rather than the lamb son of Joseph would conquer.[14]

Talmud

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

  • In the Jerusalem Talmud Brachot 2:4, 5a an Arab tells a Jew that the messiah is born. His father’s name is Hezekiah and he will be named Menahem. He is not referred to as the Messiah ben Joseph. However some have linked this passage to Messiah ben Joseph. Selling his cow and plough he buys some swaddling cloth and travels from town to town. He travels to Bethlehem where the child is born. All the women are buying their children clothing except Menahem’s mother. She says her son is an enemy of Israel because he is born on the day the second temple was destroyed. He tells her that if she does not have money today she can pay later. He says that the child is surely the messiah who will rebuild the temple. When he returns she tells him that Menahem has been carried by a divine wind up to heaven. He will later return as Israel’s messiah.[15][16]: 24, 122
  • In the Babylonian Talmud Sanhedrin 98b Menahem ben Hezekiah is also mentioned along with a list of other names of the messiah suggested by different rabbis. Again he is not referred to directly as the Messiah ben Joseph. Menahem’s name translates as “the comforter”. The Rabbis also called the messiah the leper scholar, using a pun related to a disciple of Rabbi Judah haNasi who was smitten by leper. The passage states that he has borne our grief and carried our sorrows. Yet we esteemed him a leper smitten by god.[6][17]
  • Babylonian Talmud Sukkah 52a records of a dispute between Rabbi Dosa ben Harkinas and other unnamed rabbis. Rabbi Dosa takes Zechariah 12:10 to apply to the mourning for Messiah ben Joseph, while the rabbis think the mourning is for the evil inclination. The talmudic redactor sides with Rabbi Dosa: the mourning is for Messiah ben Joseph. (Mourning the Evil Inclination, he adds, would be absurd.) It then speaks of how Ben Joseph's death frightens Messiah ben David, so that he urgently prays for his life to be spared.[8]: 79–83
  • The Jerusalem Talmud Sukkah 5:2 also mentions Messiah ben Joseph.[8]: 90
  • Babylonian Talmud Sukkah 52b presents the Four Craftsmen. Each may have a role to play in the ushering in the messianic age they are listed as Elijah, Messiah ben David, Righteous Priest and Messiah ben Joseph.[2][8]: 84

The Talmud uses the Hebrew ben rather than the Aramaic bar when giving the linage of these messiahs, suggesting a date before 200 CE. Other parts of the passage are Aramaic confusing the matter.[8]: 84 The similarity between 4Q175 and the Four Craftsman suggest that the Messiah ben Joseph probably existed in some form by the early 1st century BCE.[8]: 87–89

Targum

Targumim were spoken paraphrases, explanations, and expansions of the Jewish scriptures that a Rabbi would give in the common language of the listeners.

The common Targum for Zechariah 12.10 is non-messianic. However, In the Jerusalem Targum to Zechariah 12.10, Messiah bar Ephraim is slain by Gog.[18] In the Islamic era Targum Pseudo-Jonathan to Exodus 40.9-11, three messiahs Messiah ben David, Messiah ben Ephraim and Elijah are listed. Messiah ben Ephraims' death is not mentioned.[8]: 87[19] The Targum on song of songs 4.5 compares Messiah ben David and Messiah ben Ephraim to Moses and Aaron.[20] All of these Targum refer to Messiah ben Ephraim rather than Messiah ben Joseph[8]: 89 Dating of these Targum is difficult. Dating earlier than the fourth century CE cannot be affirmed.[18][20] The same is true for many of the Midrashim.

Sefer Zerubbabel

Sefer Zerubbabel, also called the Book of Zerubbabel or the Apocalypse of Zerubbabel, is a medieval Hebrew apocalypse written at the beginning of the 7th century[21] in the style of biblical visions (e.g. Daniel, Ezekiel) placed into the mouth of Zerubbabel. It narrates the struggle between Armilus and the Messiah whose name is Nehemiah ben Hushiel ben Ephraim ben Joseph. He will proceed Menahem ben Ammiel identified as the future Messiah ben David. Armilus is thought to be a cryptogram for Heraclius and the events described in the Sefer Zerubbabel coincide with the Jewish revolt against Heraclius.[22] The Sefer Zerubbabel mentions Gog and Armilos rather than Gog and Magog as the enemies.[23]: 60 In the Sefer Zerubbabel a celestial Temple is built in heaven and then lowered to earth.[24]

Otot ha-Mašiah (Signs of the Messiah)

Another medieval Hebrew apocalypse the Otot ha-Mašiah also casts Nehemiah ben Hushiel as the Messiah ben Joseph.[25] It gives a less historically linked account but is also thought to be dated to the beginning of the 7th century.[22] The following texts all mention Nehemiah as the Messiah ben Joseph. They are all similar to ’Otot ha-Mašiah (Signs of the Messiah). The texts all contain ten signs of the coming of the Messiah. Nehemiah will confront Armilos with a Torah scroll in all of them.[23] The texts are ’Otot of R. Shimon b. Yohai[26] and Ten Signs[27]

Nistarot (Secrets of) R. Shimon b. Yohai

Dated after the fall of the Umayyad in the 8th century this midrashic Muslim Jewish text is generally positive towards Islam.[23]: 10 Messiah ben Joseph will rebuild the temple but be killed in battle with Armilos. Armilos is described as bald having a leprous forehead and small eyes.[28]

Midrash

Messiah ben Joseph has an established place in the apocalypses of later centuries and in the midrash literature.

  • Pesikta de-Rav Kahana 5.9 here the four craftsmen are listed as Elijah, the King Messiah, Melchizedek and the Anointed for War.[8]: 86
  • Song of Songs Rabbah also lists the four craftsmen. Here they are listed as Elijah, the King Messiah, Melchizedek and the Anointed for War.[8]: 86[29]
  • Pesikta Rabbati 15.14/15 likewise the four craftsmen are listed as Elijah, the King Messiah, Melchizedek and the Anointed for War.[8]: 86 Pesikta Rabbati references an Ephraim Messiah rather than a Messiah ben Ephraim.[8]: 89 It has been argued that this text may not refer to the Messiah ben Joseph but rather to the Messiah ben David.[12]: 95–96
  • Genesis Rabbah In 75:6 the blessing on Joseph from Deuteronomy 33:17 is applied to the War Messiah later in 99:2 we are told that the War Messiah will be a decedent of Joseph.[8]: 85
  • Pirke De-Rabbi Eliezer like the Sefer Zerubbabel refers to Menahem ben Ammiel. He is referred to as the son of Joseph. In others editions the name Menahem son of Ammiel son of Joseph is omitted and the text simple refers to the son of David. According to the Zohar and the Sefer Zerubbabel, Menahem is the Messiah ben David.[30] Pirke De-Rabbi Eliezer is often thought to have had Christian and Muslim influences. The text is often dated from the eighth or ninth century.[31] The Isawiyya were an important Jewish sect founded by Abu Isa and sometimes linked with the rise of Shia Islam.[32] Al-Shahrastani appears to have identified with the Isawiyya.[33] The writer of Pirke De-Rabbi Eliezer is also thought by some to have identified with the Isawiyya. The description Al-Shahrastani gives of Abu Isa is very similar to the one given to Menahem ben Ammiel in Pirke De-Rabbi Eliezer.[34] Thus it has been suggested that Abu Isa may have thought himself the Messiah ben Joseph.[32]
  • In Saadia's description of the future Emunoth ve-Deoth: viii Messianic redemption, dating from the early 10th century. Messiah ben Joseph will appear in the Upper Galilee prior to the coming of Messiah ben David; he will gather the children of Israel around him, march to Jerusalem, and there, after overcoming the hostile powers, reestablish Temple worship and set up his own dominion.[35]: 301–303 Similarities with the Sefer Zerubbabel suggest that it is likely that Saadia Gaon knew of that work.[23]: 48 After going over this sequence of events Saadia Gaon states that Messiah ben Joseph will only need to appear if Israel does not repent. If needed Messiah ben Joseph will rectify the conditions of the nations. He could be like one who purges with fire the grave sinners among the nations. Or for those who have committed lesser infractions he would wash away those sins with lye.[35]: 304
  • In Tanna Devei Eliyahu the four craftsmen are listed the same as in the Talmud as Elijah, Messiah ben David, Righteous Priest and Messiah ben Joseph.[8]: 86
  • The Midrash Aggadat ha-Mašiah is part of the larger compilation the Lekah Tov. The Lekah Tov was compiled around the turn of the eleventh century in Byzantium. Messiah ben Joseph is described as building the temple. He seemed to have been given priestly functions, as he also offers sacrifices.[37]:96 again Messiah ben Joseph will be found in the Upper Galilee where Israel will assemble.[38]
  • Numbers Rabbah 14.1 here the Righteous Priest has been replaced. The four craftsmen are listed as Elijah, Redeemer from David, War Messiah from Ephraim, Messiah from Manasseh.[8]: 86
  • Yalkut Shimoni 569 lists the four craftsmen as Elijah, Messiah ben David, Righteous Priest and Messiah ben Joseph.[8]: 86

The event surrounding Messiah ben Joseph’s death vary. Different accounts give different enemies Armilus, Gog and Magog. After his death what happens to his corpse also varies. His corpse, according to one group,[who?] will lie unburied in the streets of Jerusalem. According to the other,[who?] it will be hidden by the angels with the bodies of the Patriarchs, until Messiah ben David comes, when God will resurrect him (comp. Jew. Encyc. i. 682, 684 [§§ 8 and 13]; comp.).[40]

Zohar

Following the apocalyptic battles the Messiah enters a pillar of fire which will hide him for twelve months. Some view this figure as the Messiah ben Joseph who has been killed. The text in the Zohar probably does not reflect Moses de Leon's views. The suffering messiah was marginal in his Hebrew writings.[37]:113–114 Several of the Zohar Mishpatim mention Messiah ben Ephraim.[8]: 89

Kol HaTor

The Kol HaTor, written by Rabbi Hillel Rivlin, deals at length with the Messiah ben Joseph and his role in bringing back the exiles and rebuilding the Land of Israel. The Kol HaTor states that Joshua is the ancestor of Messiah ben Ephraim. Joshua was the first to wage war against Amalek. Messiah ben Joseph will likewise wage war against Amalek.[41]

Ten Lost Tribes

Throughout the Hebrew bible Ephraim is often used to refer collectively to the northern kingdom. Ephraim was the leading tribe in the north. It has been claimed that Messiah ben Joseph does not represent the leader of the Ten Lost Tribes and that he is never presented as such.[40] Rather he is presented as the leader of all of Israel. However some later Jewish sources do explicitly call the Messiah ben Joseph the leader of the Ten Lost Tribes.

Mikweh Israel was written by the 17th century kabbalist Menasseh Ben Israel. The text deals at some length with the author’s theory that parts of the ten tribes can be found among the Native Americans.[42]:17–56 In the text the author calls the Messiah ben Joseph the future leader of the ten lost tribes.[42]:43

In his commentary on Ezekiel 37 the Malbim also says that the Messiah ben Joseph will be the leader of the Ten Lost Tribes when they return. The Messiah ben Joseph will initiate union with Judah, who will be led by the Messiah ben David. Later, the Messiah ben Joseph is killed and Messiah ben David will rule over all Twelve Tribes.[citation needed]

Jewish understanding

Modern Jews do not believe in original sin. It is believed that each Jew individual is responsible to follow the 613 mitzvot to the best of his abilities. Non-Jews are expected to keep the Seven Laws of Noah. When sacrifices were offered in ancient times they were offered as a fulfillment of the 613 mitzvot. Modern Jews instead offer tzedakah a form of charity.[43] Traditionally most common among Ashkenazi Jews, some perform kapparot as a form of tzedakah. On Yom Kippur God judges each individual yearly. If Messiah ben Joseph is killed it is not considered a sacrifice but rather a tragedy that will befall Israel proceeding the eschaton. Neither Messiah ben Joseph nor Messiah ben David will remove the requirement to keep the 613 mitzvot.[44] Observant Jews almost universally believe that animal sacrifice will be resumed once the third temple is built.

Kabbalah

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

Ecstatic Kabbalah

Abraham Abulafia was the founder of Ecstatic Kabbalah. He seems to have identified Jesus as the Messiah ben Joseph referring to him as “the sixth day” and as Satan.[37]:123[45]:208[46] Abulafia linked Jesus with the month of Tammuz, the month of the sin of the golden calf.[37]:123[45]:206 Abulafia referred to himself as “the seventh day” and the true Messiah ben David. He claimed to be both the Messiah ben David and a Kohen like Melchizedek. He supported this by claiming that his father was of Judah), his mother of Levi and his wife of the Kohen.[37]:94–96 He also identified himself as the priestly angel Metatron.[45]:208

He set out on a messianic mission to Rome to convert the Pope to Judaism. The Pope ordered him burned at the stake. However the day before he entered Rome, the Pope died of an apoplectic stroke. Abulafia claimed to have killed the Pope by invoking the name of God.[37]:94–96, 371, 59–61, 82–83, 97–98

In one of his later works Abulafia claimed to have been driven mad by Satan but that God had protected him. He claimed that Elijah brought him to Messina where he completed the Otzar Eden HaGanuz. He wrote that but for accidents and fantasies his seven disciples would not have been driven away from him. He hoped that one in particular Rabbi Saadia ben Yitzchak Sanalmapi who he dedicated the work to would forgive him.[47]

Abulafia’s writings were condemned by his local Jewish congregation and were not used in Spanish schools. His meditation techniques would influence many later writings and are still studied today. Later writers would marginalize Abulafia's messianic elements.[37]:361 In Ecstatic Kabbalah Metatron is a messianic figure.[48] This tradition predates Abulafia going back to the Book of Parables and 3 Enoch and other writings.[37]:46,48, 72, 86, 88 The earlier Merkabah mysticism also references Metatron.[49]

Lurianic Kabbalah

In Lurianic Kabbalah Adam incorporated all souls; it is possible for different soul-sections to be given to different people.[50] In addition multiple people can share the same soul root.[51] In the Kabbalistic understanding, the Righteous Priest would be reincarnated as Abel, Seth, Noah and Shem.[50][52] Moses like Adam also incorporated all souls.[50] Messiah ben Joseph was incarnated as Cain he was notably reincarnated as Joseph (son of Jacob) and Jeroboam. Messiah ben David was incarnated as Abel and David.[53]:197 Most of the Messiah ben Joseph claimants have been Kabbalists, or made by Kabbalists. In the Kabbalistic understanding this does not necessarily mean a literal claim of messiahship is being made.

Academic views

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

The exact origins of Messiah ben Joseph are a matter of debate among scholars. It has been suggested that Messiah ben Joseph arose out of a Jewish collective memory of Simon bar Kokhba. Others suggest that his origins are older.[6][54]

Some academic scholars have argued to varying degrees that Christianity and Judaism did not separate as suddenly or as dramatically as sometimes thought and that the idea of two messiahs, one suffering, the second fulfilling the traditional messianic role, was normative to ancient Judaism, in fact predating Jesus. Furthermore Jesus would have been viewed as fulfilling this role.[8]: 91–112[55][56][57]

Christian views

Traditional

Traditional Christians do not believe that Jesus was a candidate for the Messiah ben Joseph. They believe rather that he was the Messiah ben David and that he was of the tribe of Judah and a descendant of David, whereas the Messiah ben Joseph will be a descendant of Joseph from the tribe of Ephraim. Furthermore, some assert that the passages associated with Messiah ben Joseph have no power of redemption.[58] Christians have associated the Four Craftsmen in varying ways with the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse[59][60]

Messianic Jews

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

Certain Messianic Jewish groups have associated Messiah ben Joseph with Jesus based on the New Testament account in which Jesus’s stepfathers name is given as Joseph.[58] Ben in this context literally translates from Hebrew as "son of".

Christian Kabbalah

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

In some modern forms of Christian Kabbalah, based on Lurianic Kabbalah, Jesus is not literal the Son of God but rather a composite being like Adam. In other words a full rectified Adam, in this understanding Jesus is linked with the title Son of Man given in the New Testament. Messiah ben Joseph is part of this entity[61]

In some Christian forms of Ecstatic Kabbalah Jesus is Metatron, Melchizedek, Messiah ben Joseph and Messiah ben David.[62] Often time’s incompatible Kabbalists teachings are blended together with Christian, new age and occult beliefs.

Mormons

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

Some Mormon groups have associated Messiah ben Joseph with Joseph Smith.[63]

Messiah ben Joseph claimants

  • Simon of Peraea (killed by the romans in 4 BCE)
  • Nehemiah ben Hushiel (Killed in Jerusalem 614)
  • Abu Isa may have thought himself the Messiah ben Joseph. He was the founder of the Isawiyya an important Jewish sect and sometimes linked with the rise of Shia Islam.[32]
  • Isaac Luria (1534–1572) Safed Kabbalists claimed that both Isaac Luria and Hayyim Vital were reincarnations of Messiah ben Joseph. However, the world was not yet ready for coming of the messiah.[16]: 29–30[53]:191
  • Hayyim Vital (1543–1620) In a letter, a sequence of events starting in 1574 is laid out. He is named as the Messiah ben Joseph with Abraham Shalom as the Messiah ben David.[16]: 30
  • Joshua Heschel Zoref (1633-1700): claimed to be Messiah ben Joseph, with Shabbetai Zvi as the Messiah ben David.[64]
  • Abraham Miguel Cardoso (1626 – 1706) He was a follower of Shabbetai Zvi. He proclaimed himself Messiah ben Joseph, although later in life he disavowed this claim.[65]
  • Judah Leib Prossnitz (1670-1750): claimed to be Messiah ben Joseph, with Shabbetai Zvi as the Messiah ben David.[66]
  • Nachman of Breslov (1772-1810) His followers claimed that he was a reincarnation mostly of Messiah ben Joseph but also of Messiah ben David; it is unclear if he made this claim about himself.[53]: 194–196
  • Theodor Herzl (May 2, 1860 – July 3, 1904) Rabbi Abraham Isaac Kook (1865–1935) Rav Kook gave a eulogy for Theodor Herzl who died at only forty-four. Rav Kook not wanting to pay direct tribute to a secular Jew for Halakha reasons. Instead deviated from a traditional Jewish eulogy and used various Jewish texts in his address while never giving direct tribute to Herzl. He wrote that Zionism could be symbolized as the “footstep of Messiah son of Joseph.” He compared and contrasted secular Zionist to religiously observant Jews. Comparing the two as being of the “tree of Joseph” and “tree of Judah” respectively. He wished for the unification of the two trees and finally “This is the benefit to be gained by remorse over one whom we might consider the “footstep of Messiah son of Joseph”, in view of his influence in revitalizing the nation materially and generally. This power should not be abandoned despite the wantonness and hatred of Torah that results in the expulsion of God-fearing Jews from the movement.”[67]

See also

External links

References

  1. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  3. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  4. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  5. ”Elijah, Cup of.” Encyclopedia Judaica. Jerusalem: Keter Publishing House, 1971.
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  7. 7.0 7.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  8. 8.00 8.01 8.02 8.03 8.04 8.05 8.06 8.07 8.08 8.09 8.10 8.11 8.12 8.13 8.14 8.15 8.16 8.17 8.18 8.19 8.20 8.21 8.22 8.23 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  9. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  10. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  11. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  12. 12.0 12.1 12.2 12.3 12.4 12.5 12.6 12.7 12.8 12.9 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  13. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  14. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  15. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  16. 16.0 16.1 16.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  17. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  18. 18.0 18.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  19. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  20. 20.0 20.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  21. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  22. 22.0 22.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  23. 23.0 23.1 23.2 23.3 23.4 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  24. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  25. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  26. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  27. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  28. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  29. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  30. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  31. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  32. 32.0 32.1 32.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  33. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  34. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  35. 35.0 35.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  36. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  37. 37.0 37.1 37.2 37.3 37.4 37.5 37.6 37.7 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  38. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  39. Journal of Jewish art - Volume 10 - Page 8 Universiṭah ha-ʻIvrit bi-Yerushalayim. Merkaz le-omanut Yehudit - 1984 "According to the eleventh-century Midrash Vayosha',19 Pharaoh was taken down by the Archangel Gabriel to the ..."
  40. 40.0 40.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  41. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  42. 42.0 42.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  43. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  44. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  45. 45.0 45.1 45.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  46. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  47. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  48. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  49. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  50. 50.0 50.1 50.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  51. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  52. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  53. 53.0 53.1 53.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  54. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  55. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  56. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  57. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  58. 58.0 58.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  59. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  60. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  61. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  62. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  63. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  64. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  65. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  66. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  67. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

 This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domainLua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found. This article is an evolution of the corresponding article which gives the following Bibliography:

R. Smend, Alttestamentliche Religionsgesch.;
W. Nowack, Die Zukunftshoffnung Israels in der Assyrischen Zeit;
Hühn, Die Messianischen Weissagungen;
Fr. Giesebrecht, Der Knecht Jahwe's in Deutero-Jesaia;
Schürer, Gesch. 3d ed., ii. 29;
W. Bousset, Die Religion des Judentums im Neutestamentlichen Zeitalter, part 3, ch. ii.-v.; part 6, pp. 474 et seq.;
P. Volz, Jüdische Eschatologie von Daniel bis Akiba, §§ 34-35;
H. J. Holtzmann, Lehrbuch der Neutestamentlichen Theologie, i. 68-85;
W. Baldensperger, Die Messianisch-Apokalyptischen Hoffnungen des Judentums;
F. Weber, Jüdische Theologie auf Grund des Talmud, etc., ch. xxii.-xxiii.;
G. H. Dalman, Der Leidende und der Sterbende Messias;
idem, Die Worte Jesu, pp. 191 et seq.;
Kampers, Alexander der Grosse und die Idee des Weltimperiums in Prophetie und Sage;
B. Beer, Welchen Aufschluss Geben die Jüdischen Quellen über den "Zweigehörnten" des Korans? in Z. D. M. G. ix. 791 et seq.