Michael Hicks (historian)

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

Michael Hicks
Born (1948-12-03) 3 December 1948 (age 75)
Nationality English
Fields Medieval English History, the Yorkist Kings, the Wars of the Roses, Richard III, bastard feudalism
Institutions King Alfred's College, Winchester; University of Winchester
Alma mater University of Oxford
Doctoral advisor C.A.J. Armstrong, Hertford College, Oxford
Known for Professor of English History, Author, Lecturer

Michael Hicks (born 1948) is an English historian, specialising on the history of late medieval England, in particular the Wars of the Roses, the nature of late medieval society, and the kings and nobility of the period.

Education and academic career

Hicks studied under Charles Ross while a final-year undergraduate student at the University of Bristol (1969–70),[1] T.B. Pugh for his M.A. at Southampton (1971),[1] and C. A. J. Armstrong for his DPhil. at the University of Oxford (1975),[2] which he had originally began under J.R.L. Highfield.[3][4] In his own words, his research was- and remained[5]- firmly placed within 'the school of history founded by the late K.B. McFarlane... the Master" although with a heavy "biographical bent."[1] His first published article, however, was on an aspect of law in the seventeenth century.[6] Having worked for the Victoria County History project between 1974–78,[5] he joined King Alfred's College, Winchester, later the University of Winchester.[7] A proposed joint paper with his former tutor, Charles Ross, on bastard feudalism had come to nothing by 1978,[8] and a suggestion by Gerald Harriss for a joint study with Christine Carpenter, Michael Hicks and himself 'foundered on [their] incompatible points of view.'[9]

Research and interests

Originally firmly wedded to the McFarlane understanding of bastard feudalism, in which the nobility were motivated almost solely by financial and material interests, in which 'self-interest, self-advantage, and self-preservarion featured largely,'[10] this perspective gradually evolved, by the last decade of the twentieth century, into a more 'complex' understanding of the English nobility, in which their piety and religious belief, idealism and individuality are as important motives in 'high politics' as material benefit.[11] In a 2014 interview with Royal Studies Journal, he opined that, until recently, 'all History was political;' but noted that there was an increasingly thematic trend to hisorical research.[12]

Retirement and later activity

Eventually Professor of Medieval History and Head of Department there until his retirement, he was appointed Emeritus Professor in September 2014.[13] He is a Fellow of the Royal Historical Society,[14] and the reviews editor for the peer-reviewed Southern History journal.[15] It has been calculated that in the thirty-five year period to 2013 he published seventy five articles and full-length studies, averaging over two per year. As of 2012,[16] his most recent work has centred on the Inquisitions post mortem,[17] and he is now principal investigator on a project "dedicated to creating a digital edition of the medieval English inquisitions."[18][19]

Exhumation and reburial of Richard III

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

Interviewd by the BBC in September 2012, amid the 'upsurge of interest' in Richard III and the attempts of the Richard III Society campaign to rehabilitate the dead king, Hicks commented that the society had members "who contain an extreme and romantic view" of Richard III, and that whilst they publish work of scholarship in his defence they have not succeeded in overturning the long-held historiographical consensus regarding the king's most well-known controversy, the fate of his nephews in the Tower of London.[20] Indeed, he went so far as to cast doubt that the bones discovered in Leicester were actually those of the king, saying "lots of other people who suffered similar wounds could have been buried in the choir of the church where the bones were found".[21] Elsewhere, however, he called the popular English television series The White Queen's portrayal of the people and time "useful and informative."[22]

Recognition

A festschrift for Michael Hicks was published in 2015 by Boydell and Brewer, and included contributions from academic colleagues and past students. Of the former these included Caroline Barron, Anne Curry, Ralph A. Griffiths, Christopher Dyer, Tony Pollard, and James Ross. Of his former students, Gordon McKelvie, Jessica Lutkin, and Karen Stober all contributed, as did the editor of The Ricardian journal, Anne F. Sutton.[23]

Select publications

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Hicks. M.A., Richard III & his Rivals: Magnates and their Motives in the War of the Roses, London 1991, ix
  2. Hicks. M.A., Richard III & his Rivals: Magnates and their Motives in the War of the Roses London 1991, ix
  3. Clarke, L. (ed.), The Fifteenth Century XIV: Essays Presented to Michael Hicks, Woodbridge 2015, xi
  4. Hicks, M.A., False, Fleeting, Perjur'd Clarence: George, Duke of Clarence, 1449-78, Gloucester 1980, 9
  5. 5.0 5.1 Clarke, L. (ed.), The Fifteenth Century XIV: Essays Presented to Michael Hicks, Woodbridge 2015, xvi
  6. . Hicks. M.A., Richard III & his Rivals: Magnates and their Motives in the War of the Roses, London 1991, x; Hicks, M.A., 'Draper v. Crowther: The Prebend of Brownswood Dispute 1664-1692', London & Middlesex Archaeology, 28 (1977).
  7. http://www.winchester.ac.uk/academicdepartments/history/peopleprofiles/pages/professormichaelhicks.aspx
  8. Hicks. M.A., Richard III & his Rivals: Magnates and their Motives in the War of the Roses, London 1991, x, xi
  9. Hicks. M.A., Richard III & his Rivals: Magnates and their Motives in the War of the Roses, London 1991, xii
  10. Hicks. M.A., Richard III & his Rivals: Magnates and their Motives in the War of the Roses, London 1991, xii
  11. Hicks. M.A., Richard III & his Rivals: Magnates and their Motives in the War of the Roses, London 1991, xii-xiii
  12. https://royalstudiesjournal.wordpress.com/2014/07/15/interview-with-historian-michael-hicks/
  13. [1], University of Winchester History Department Person Profile for Michael Hicks.
  14. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  15. Clarke, L. (ed.), The Fifteenth Century XIV: Essays Presented to Michael Hicks, Woodbridge 2015, xvii
  16. Hicks, M.A. (ed.), The Fifteenth-Century Inquisitions Post Mortem: A Companion, Woodbridge 2012
  17. Clarke, L. (ed.), The Fifteenth Century XIV: Essays Presented to Michael Hicks, Woodbridge 2015, xv, xvi
  18. http://www.inquisitionspostmortem.ac.uk/
  19. http://www.inquisitionspostmortem.ac.uk/personnel/
  20. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-19572103
  21. http://www.historyextra.com/news/was-skeleton-found-leicester-car-park-really-richard-iii
  22. http://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2013/jun/24/medieval-historians-view-white-queen
  23. Clarke, L. (ed.), The Fifteenth Century XIV: Essays Presented to Michael Hicks, Woodbridge 2015, x-xi

External links