Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. Partnership
From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
| Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. Partnership | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||
| Argued April 18, 2011 Decided June 9, 2011 |
|||||
| Full case name | Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. Partnership | ||||
| Docket nos. | 10-290 | ||||
| Citations | 564 U.S. ___ (more)
131 S.Ct. 2238
|
||||
| Court membership | |||||
|
|||||
| Case opinions | |||||
| Majority | Sotomayor, joined by Scalia, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito, Kagan | ||||
| Concurrence | Breyer, joined by Scalia, Alito | ||||
| Concurrence | Thomas | ||||
| Roberts took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. | |||||
Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. Partnership, 564 U.S. ___ (2011), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States that the patent-in-reexamination is still valid without any exceptions under 35 USC 282, even if the suggested material is not considered in the process of patent application. To reverse the presumption of validity, the plaintiff should show clear and convincing evidence.[1]
References
- ↑ Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Limited Partnership, 131 S.Ct. 2238 (2011)
