Murray-Darling Basin Authority

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search
Murray-Darling Basin Authority
MDBA
Agency overview
Formed December 2008
Preceding agency
  • Murray-Darling Basin Commission
Headquarters Canberra
Annual budget A$280 m (2009–2010)
Agency executive
  • Dr Rhondda Dickson,
    Chief Executive Officer
Parent agency Minister for the Environment
Website www.mdba.gov.au

The Murray-Darling Basin Authority is the principal government agency in charge of managing the Murray-Darling Basin in an integrated and sustainable manner. The Authority (MDBA) is the statutory agency that manages, in conjunction with the Basin states, the Murray–Darling Basin’s water resources in the national interest. The Authority reports to the Australian Government Minister for the Environment.[1]

The Authority was established under the federal Water Act (2007),[2] which was introduced under the Howard Government as part of the National Water Plan for Water Security. The Water Act (2007) was a response to the drought and the potential effects of climate change in Australia.[3] The law aimed to fulfill Australia's obligations under the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands.[4] The 2007 Act was substantially amended in 2008.[5]

The Chief Executive of the Authority is Dr Rhondda Dickson who replaced Rob Freeman (resigned 1 June 2011).[6] The Chairman of the Authority is Neil Andrew who replaced Craig Knowles after his term as Chair expired in 2015. Andrew is a former Liberal member of the Australian House of Representatives from March 1983 to October 2004.

Whilst the Authority is a Commonwealth Government agency, an inter-governmental Murray‑Darling Basin Ministerial Council (Ministerial Council) acts in an advisory role in the preparation and implementation of the Basin Plan by the Authority. This Council comprises the Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for the Environment (who also chairs the council) and one minister from each of the basin states (Queensland, New South Wales, Victoria, and South Australia) and the Australian Capital Territory. The Ministerial Council introduced the Murray-Darling Cap in response to the 1995 report titled "An Audit of Water Use in the Murray-Darling Basin".[7]

Role of the Authority

Map of the Murray-Darling Basin

With the creation of the Authority in 2008, for the first time, a single inter-governmental body assumed responsibility for planning the integrated management of water resources of the Murray-Darling Basin. In addition to the Commission’s former functions, the Authority’s role includes:

  • prepare, implement and enforce the Murray-Darling Basin Plan
  • advising the minister on the accreditation of state water resource plans
  • developing a water rights information service which facilitates water trading across the Murray-Darling basin
  • measuring and monitoring water resources in the basin
  • gathering information and undertaking research
  • educating and engaging the community in the management of the basin’s resources.[8]

The Murray–Darling Basin Authority is an integral element of the Commonwealth Government's program Water for the Future which has four priorities; namely:

  1. tackling climate change
  2. supporting healthy rivers
  3. using water wisely and
  4. securing water supplies.[8]

The Authority also commissions research into aquatic science and is a source of information on Australian freshwater biology.

History

Since 1914, there have been various intergovernmental agreements relating to Murray‑Darling water resources.[3] Widespread degradation of the Murray-Darling Basin’s natural resources was apparent in the 1980s.[citation needed] At the time, institutional arrangements for water resources management lay with the five State and Territory governments in the Basin, with little co-ordination. In response to this problem, the Murray-Darling Basin Commission was established in January 1988 under the Murray-Darling Basin Agreement, with a charter to efficiently manage and equitably distribute River Murray water resources. Secondly, it was to protect and improve the water quality of the River Murray and its tributaries; and lastly to advise the Murray-Darling Ministerial Council on water, land and environmental management in the Basin.[9]

The Water Amendment Act 2008 was introduced in December 2008 to amend the Water Act 2007.[10] This law transferred authority from the Murray-Darling Basin Commission to the Murray-Darling Basin Authority, creating an independent, expert-based body that would manage the Basin holistically for the first time.[11]

As at November 2014, the Authority is two years into the implementation phase of the Basin Plan. The MDBA has published major bodies of work including:

  • Annual Watering Priorities
  • Constraints management Strategy
  • commenced new Water trade rules
  • Basin Environmental Watering Strategy

The MDBA also established a water trading scheme across states to increase water use efficiency.[9]

The Murray-Darling Basin Plan

The Murray-Darling Basin Plan was signed off by Tony Burke, Minister for Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities on 22 November 2012, and passed its final hurdle in the Australian Parliament on the 29 November 2012. Following is the history leading up to this significant occasion in the history of Australian water reform.

On 8 October 2010, the Authority released a major document entitled the Guide to the Proposed Murray-Darling Basin Plan outlining a plan to secure the long-term ecological health of the Murray-Darling Basin. The plan entailed cutting existing water allocations and increasing environmental flows.[12] The proposed plan was the first part of a three-stage process to address the problems of the Murray-Darling Basin; namely, over-allocation, prolonged drought, natural climate variability and climate change, leading to deteroriation of rivers, wetlands, forests and floodplains in the basin.[13]

MDBA is responsible for preparing and overseeing a legally enforceable management plan – the Basin Plan. The main aim of the Plan (passed by the Australian Parliament in November 2012) is to return around 2,750 GL to the river system.[14] The authority originally reported that the a volume of water as high as 7,600 gigalitres per year would bring long-term sustainability[15] and would be the best scenario for the ecosystems of the basin but "would not be socially or economically viable".[16]

The Basin Plan sets and enforces environmentally sustainable limits on the quantities of water that may be taken from Basin water resources. It has Basin-wide environmental, water quality and salinity objectives and aims to develop efficient water trading regimes across the Basin. The plan includes requirements for state water resource plans and aims to improve water security for all Basin users.[1] The Basin Plan aims to achieve a balance between environmental, economic and social considerations .[17]

With the release of the Guide to the Proposed Murray-Darling Basin Plan there were a significant number of protests and voiced concerns in rural towns that the MDBA visited to present the proposed plan at consultation meetings.[18] In Renmark, more than 500 people attended the Authority's first public consultation meeting in the local hotel that accommodated only 250 people. The draft plan proposed water cuts of up to 35% in the Riverland area, forcing job losses and reduced flows to angry irrigators.[19] Over 5,000 people attended a meeting in Griffith where the local Mayor, Mike Neville, said the plan would "obliterate" Murrumbidgee valley communities.[20] Other groups also echoed this feeling, such as the Victorian Farmers Federation[21] and the Wine Group Growers' Australia.[22] There was also been support for the draft plan by various groups, including the Australian Conservation Foundation,[23] and Environment Victoria.[24]

In legal advice, dated 25 October 2010, from the Australian Government Solicitor,[25] the Government's reading is that the draft plan must give equal weight to the environmental, social and economic impacts of proposed cuts to irrigation. Environmentalists and South Australian irrigators say the Authority should stick to its original figure.[26] In October 2010, a parliamentary inquiry into the economic impacts of the plan was announced.[27] While, in November 2010, the Authority announced that it might be forced to push back the release of its final plan for the river system until early 2012.[28]

Less than one month later, Mike Taylor, then Chair of the Authority, announced his decision to resign effective from the end of January 2011. In announcing his resignation, he cited his concerns that the Water Act made it difficult to balance the environmental and socio-economic impacts of cuts to water allocations aimed at rescuing rivers in the basin.[29][30] Of crucial concern was Taylor's desire to not oversee a process that returned less than 3,000 GL to the basin.[31] Both the Prime Minister, Julia Gillard, and the Water Minister, Tony Burke, rejected Taylor's concerns that the Water Act and the objectives of the Authority were compromised.[29][32]

In May 2011, The Wentworth Group of Concerned Scientists withdrew its support for the Murray Darling Basin Plan, who described the process as seriously flawed and a waste of taxpayers' money.[33] The Wentworth Group said they could not support the plan which they believed would cost billions and claimed that it would not fix the problems in the river system.[33] The Wentworth Group wanted a minimum 4000 gigalitres of water returned to the river system but the group believed that it would not happen under the draft plan.[33]

In June 2011, a federal parliamentary committee (chaired by independent Tony Windsor) delivered its report to the Murray-Darling Basin Authority and its recommendations on water cutbacks in the basin. The committee was told river communities faced annihilation if 4,000 gigalitres was returned to the environment. The committee also reported that the health of the river system could be protected without the cuts.[34] The Australian Conservation Foundation says it is disappointed by the report delivered by the inquiry into the Murray-Darling river system. The Australian Conservation Foundation believes that buybacks are the most efficient way to save the basin.[35]

In November 2011, the draft plan was finally released. The plan proposes that 2,750 gigalitres per year be cut from water allocations over a period of seven years.[36]

According to a study by Wentworth Group, the MDBA originally planned to start buying the 2,750 gigalitres of water and to increase groundwater extractions by 2,600 gigalitres at the same time in March 2011.[37] Many of the groundwater is linked to river systems, but the Plan does not count it in the models.:[38]

<templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />

The Plan does not incorporate in the modelling the impact that increasing groundwater extractions by over 2,600GL will have on surface water flows, many of the groundwater systems in the Basin are linked to river systems. The Plan [also] sets long term diversion limits on the assumption that there is no risk to river health from climate change.

— Wentworth Group Statement on the 2011 Draft Murray-Darling Basin Plan

In late May 2012, a revision of the plan was forwarded to state water ministers for review.[39] It did not alter the recommendation to return 2,750 gigalitres of water to the environment by cutting water entitlements.

Following much negotiation between the Commonwealth and State governments and numerous submissions from interested stakeholders and the community,the Basin Plan finally became law in November 2012 and is now being implemented.

See also

References

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "smr" defined multiple times with different content
  2. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  4. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  5. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  6. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  7. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  8. ↑ 8.0 8.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  9. ↑ 9.0 9.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  10. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  11. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  12. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  13. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  14. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  15. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  16. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  17. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  18. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  19. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  20. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  21. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  22. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  23. ↑ http://www.wetrivers.unsw.edu.au/2010/11/basin-plan-support/
  24. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  25. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  26. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  27. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  28. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  29. ↑ 29.0 29.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  30. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  31. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  32. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  33. ↑ 33.0 33.1 33.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  34. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  35. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  36. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  37. ↑ Scientists want 'manipulated' Basin plan scrapped - ABC News, 19 January 2011.
  38. ↑ Wentworth Group Statement on the 2011 Draft Murray-Darling Basin Plan
  39. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

External links

Retrieved from "https://infogalactic.com/w/index.php?title=Murray-Darling_Basin_Authority&oldid=698808137"