National Democratic Union (Brazil)

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search
National Democratic Union
President See list below
Secretary-General See list below
Founded April 7, 1945 (1945-04-07)
Dissolved October 27, 1965 (1965-10-27)
Succeeded by National Renewal Alliance Party (Arena)
Ideology Conservatism,[1]
Classical liberalism[1]
Political position Centre-right[2][3]
Colours Blue, White, & Red
Politics of Brazil
Political parties
Elections

The National Democratic Union (Portuguese: União Democrática Nacional, UDN) was a political party that existed in Brazil between 1945 and 1965. It was ideologically aligned with conservatism. During most of its existence, it was the country's second-strongest party.[1] Its symbol was an Olympic torch and its motto was "The price of freedom is eternal vigilance", a quote attributed to Thomas Jefferson.

History

At the end of Getúlio Vargas' Estado Novo regime in 1945, political parties were allowed to reorganize themselves and to run in the general elections of that year. UDN grouped the main leaders of the opposition against the populism of the outgoing president.[4] This constant opposition to Vargas was the party's main characteristic.[4] Therefore, its main opponents were the Social Democratic Party (PSD) and the Brazilian Labour Party (PTB), formed to give support to Vargas among the elite and the working class, respectively.

UDN was defeated in the presidential elections of 1945, 1950 and 1955,[4] but remained the second largest party in the National Congress, second only to PSD, from 1945 until 1962, when it was surpassed by PTB. The main political figure of UDN was Carlos Lacerda, a staunch enemy of Vargas, whose second presidency (1951–1954) was bitterly opposed by UDN. An assassination attempt against Lacerda led to Vargas' suicide. On 1960, UDN preferred not to launch a presidential candidate, supporting the victorious Jânio Quadros instead.[4][5] Although Quadros was not a UDN member himself, most of the ministers in the Quadros Cabinet were members of UDN. The party was soon dissatisfied with Quadros, who resigned in a clumsy political maneuver. Without UDN's support, Quadros lost the majority of seats in the Congress, and soon found out it was impossible to govern without the backing of the Parliament.[5] On August 21, 1961, just eight months after his inauguration, he resigned, hoping to return to power via popular acclaim.[5]

Vice President João Goulart from PTB (at that time, Brazilians would vote for President and Vice President separately) then took office. As soon as 1962, UDN began to conspire with military officers to topple him. A political protégé of Vargas, Goulart launched a Basic Reforms plan, predicting education reform, land reform, urban reform, electoral reform and tax reform. That was labelled by UDN as a Soviet influence on Brazilian politics.[6] The plan also made PSD withdraw its support to the Goulart government in the National Congress, leaving him in a complicated situation. On April 1964, Goulart was deposed by a US-backed military coup d'état, which had the support of most UDN members.[4] Lacerda, then governor of the Guanabara State hoped to win the scheduled presidential election of 1965. However, the military regime cancelled this election and suppressed all the political parties, including UDN. Most of its members subsequently joined the National Renewal Alliance Party (Aliança Renovadora Nacional – Arena), a new party created to endorse the military regime.

Ideology

Even before UDN supported the 1964 Brazilian Coup d'état, opponents of UDN characterized it as a golpista (pro-coups d'état) party. However, the party was not conservative as a whole. Liberal and authoritarian, conservative and progressive theses coexisted in UDN.[4][1] For instance, it voted in favor of the state monopoly on oil and against the impeachment of Communist members of the Congress.[4] On the other hand, it denounced the "Communist infiltration" in public administration, and strongly opposed government intervention in the economy.[4] As a matter of fact, members of the Democratic Left faction, which defected UDN to form the Brazilian Socialist Party (PSB), characterized the party as a free market advocate, citing this as one of the reasons for the defection.[7] Contesting the results whenever losing an election was also a common practice inside UDN.[4]

The party was marked by binding itself with the Brazilian Army[8] and the aspirations of urban middle classes, all of which became unofficially known as "udenismo".[4] An expression of the attitudes of its leaders towards politics, "udenismo" was characterized by defending classical liberalism, clinging to higher education and morality, and repulsing populism (as well as characterizing it as bad).[4]

Electoral performance

Chamber Senate
Year Votes % of votes Seats % of seats1 Seats2
1945 1,575,375 26.6 81 28.3 12
1947 677.374 32.4 5 26.3 8
1950 1,812,849 24.7 81 26.6 3
1954 1,936,935 21.9 74 22.7 18
1958 2,319,713 21.1 70 21.5 11
1962 2,547,207 22.6 97 23.7 14
1^ Percentage of seats up for election that year.
2^ Includes all seats from UDN's coalitions.
Source: Rio de Janeiro State University

Presidents

Secretaries-General

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  2. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  3. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  4. 4.00 4.01 4.02 4.03 4.04 4.05 4.06 4.07 4.08 4.09 4.10 (Portuguese) "Dicionário Político – União Democrática Nacional (UDN)". Marxists Internet Archive. Reproduced from CPDOC/Fundação Getulio Vargas.
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 (Portuguese) Nunes, Branca. "Dos sonhos de JK às vassouras de Jânio". Blog Caça ao Voto. Veja. September 2, 2010.
  6. (Portuguese) "Filmes: Cabra Marcado para Morrer". Historianet. October 24, 2000.
  7. (Portuguese) História do PSB. Brazilian Socialist Party official website.
  8. (Portuguese) Gaio, André Moysés. "Affinities Between the National Democratic Union (UDN) and the Brazilian Army". Diálogos. Maringá State University. Department of History.
  9. NICOLAS, 1977, p32.
  10. HOERNER, 2001, p153.