This article's factual accuracy may be compromised due to out-of-date information. (April 2013)
Nielsen ratings are the audience measurement systems developed by Robert F. Elder and Louis F Woodruff and sold to Nielsen Company, in an effort to determine the audience size and composition of television programming in the United States. Nielsen Media Research was founded by Arthur C. Nielsen, a market analyst whose career had begun in the 1920s with brand advertising analysis and had expanded into radio market analysis during the 1930s, culminating in Nielsen ratings of radio programming, which was meant to provide statistics as to the markets of radio shows. The first Nielsen ratings for radio programs were released the first week of December 1947. They measured the top 20 programs in four areas: total audience, average audience, cumulative audience and homes per dollar spent for time and talent.
In 1950, Nielsen moved to television, developing a ratings system using the methods he and his company had developed for radio. That method has since become the primary source of audience measurement information in the television industry around the world.
Nielsen television ratings are gathered in one of two ways:
- Viewer "diaries", in which a target audience self-records its viewing or listening habits. By targeting various demographics, the assembled statistical models provide a rendering of the audiences of any given show, network, and programming hour.
- A more technologically sophisticated system uses Set Meters, which are small devices connected to televisions in selected homes. These devices gather the viewing habits of the home and transmit the information nightly to Nielsen through a "Home Unit" connected to a phone line. The technology-based home unit system is meant to allow market researchers to study television viewing habits on a minute to minute basis, seeing the exact moment viewers change channels or turn off their television set. In addition to set meters, individual viewer reporting devices, such as people meters, have allowed the company to separate household viewing information into various demographic groups, but so far Nielsen has refused to change its distribution of data of ethnic groups into subgroups[clarification needed], which could give more targeted information to networks and advertisers.
Changing systems of viewing have impacted Nielsen's methods of market research. In 2005, Nielsen began measuring the usage of digital video recording devices such as TiVo. Initial results indicated that time-shifted viewing will have a significant impact on television ratings. A year later, the networks were not yet figuring these new results into their ad rates because of the resistance of advertisers.
The most commonly cited Nielsen results are reported in two measurements: ratings points and share, usually reported as: "ratings points/share". As of 2013[update], there were an estimated 115.6 million television households in the United States, up 1.2% from the previous year because of the inclusion of televisions that receive content over the Internet. A single national ratings point represents 1% of the total number, or 1,156,000 households for the 2013–14 season. Nielsen re-estimates the number of television-equipped households each August for the upcoming television season.
Share is the percentage of television sets in use that are tuned to the program. For example, Nielsen may report a show as receiving a 9.2/15 during its broadcast; this would mean that out of all television-equipped households, 9.2% were tuned in to that program, and out of all television-equipped households with a television currently in use 15% were tuned in to that program.
Because ratings are based on samples, it is possible for shows to get a 0.0 rating, despite having an audience; the CNBC talk show McEnroe was one notable example. Another example is The CW show, CW Now, which received two 0.0 ratings in the same season. In 2014, Nielsen reported that American viewership of live-television (totaling on average four hours and 32 minutes per day) had dropped 12 minutes per day compared to the year before. Nielsen reported several reasons for the shift away from live-television: increased viewership of time-shifted television (mainly through DVRs) and viewership of internet video (clips from video sharing websites and streams of full-length television shows).
Nielsen Media Research also provides statistics on specific demographics as advertising rates are influenced by such factors as age, gender, race, economic class, and area. Younger viewers are considered more attractive for many products, whereas in some cases older and wealthier audiences are desired, or female audiences are desired over males.
In general, the number of viewers within the 18–49 age range is more important than the total number of viewers. According to Advertising Age, during the 2007–08 season, ABC was able to charge $419,000 per commercial sold during its medical drama Grey's Anatomy, compared to only $248,000 for a commercial during CBS' CSI: Crime Scene Investigation, despite CSI having almost five million more viewers on average. Because of its strength in young "demos" (demographic groups), NBC was able to charge almost three times as much for a commercial during Friends as CBS charged for Murder, She Wrote, even though the two series had a similar amount of total viewership during the two seasons they were on the air concurrently. Glee (on Fox) and The Office (on NBC) drew fewer total viewers than NCIS (on CBS) during the 2009–10 season, but earned an average of $272,694 and $213,617 respectively, compared to $150,708 for NCIS.
Nielsen also provides viewership data calculated as the average viewership for only the commercial time within the program. These "Commercial Ratings" first became available on May 31, 2007. Additionally, Nielsen provides different "streams" of this data in order to take into consideration delayed viewing (DVR) data, at any interval up to seven days. C3 was the metric launched in 2007, and refers to the ratings for average commercial minutes in live programming plus total playback by digital video recorder out to three days after. By the end of 2012, some television executives wanted to see C7, ratings for live plus seven days, with CBS Corporation chief executive officer Les Moonves making the claim C7 made ratings increase by 30%.
Electronic metering technology is the heart of the Nielsen ratings process. Two types of meters are used: set meters capture what channel is being tuned, while People Meters go a step further and gather information about who is watching the channel at that time.
Diaries are also used to collect viewing information from sample homes in many television markets in the United States, and smaller markets are measured by paper diaries only. Each year, Nielsen processes approximately two million paper diaries from households across the country, for the months of November, February, May and July—also known as the "sweeps" rating periods. The term "sweeps" dates from 1954, when Nielsen collected diaries from households in the Eastern United States first; from there they would "sweep" west. Seven-day diaries (or eight-day diaries in homes with DVRs) are mailed to homes to keep a tally of what is watched on each television set and by whom. Over the course of a sweeps period, diaries are mailed to a new panel of homes each week. At the end of the month, all of the viewing data from the individual weeks is aggregated.
This local viewing information provides a basis for program scheduling and advertising decisions for local television stations, cable systems, and advertisers. Typically, the November, February and May sweeps are considered more important; nevertheless, the July sweeps can have local impact in regard to personnel.
In some of the mid-size markets, diaries provide viewer information for up to two additional “sweeps” months (October and January).
Nielsen sweeps periods Season November February May July 2009–2010 October 29 – November 25, 2009 February 4 – March 3, 2010 April 29 – May 26, 2010 July 1–28, 2010 2010–2011 October 28 – November 24, 2010 February 3 – March 2, 2011 April 28 – May 25, 2011 June 30 – July 27, 2011 2011–2012 October 27 – November 23, 2011 February 2–29, 2012 April 26 – May 23, 2012 June 28 – July 25, 2012 2012–2013 October 25 – November 21, 2012 January 31 – February 27, 2013 April 25 – May 22, 2013 June 27 – July 24, 2013 2013–2014 October 31 – November 27, 2013 January 30 – February 26, 2014 April 24 – May 21, 2014 July 3–30, 2014 2014–2015 October 30 – November 26, 2014 January 29 – February 25, 2015 April 23 – May 20, 2015 July 2–29, 2015 2015–2016 October 29 – November 25, 2015 February 4 – March 2, 2016 April 28 – May 25, 2016 June 30 – July 27, 2016
Criticism of ratings systems
There is some public critique regarding accuracy and potential bias within Nielsen's rating system, including some concerns that the Nielsen ratings system is rapidly becoming outdated because of new technology like smartphones, DVRs, tablet computers and Internet streaming services as preferred or alternate methods for television viewing. In June 2006, however, Nielsen announced a plan to revamp its entire methodology to include all types of media viewing in its sample.
Since viewers are aware of being part of the Nielsen sample, it can lead to response bias in recording and viewing habits. Audience counts gathered by the self-reporting diary methodology are sometimes higher than those gathered by the electronic meters which eliminate any response bias. This trend seems to be more common for news programming and popular prime time programs. In addition, daytime and late night viewing tends to be under-reported by the diary.[clarification needed]
Another criticism of the measuring system itself is that it fails the most important criterion of a sample: it is not random in the statistical sense of the word. A small fraction of the population is selected and only those that actually accept are used as the sample size. In many local areas of the 1990s, the difference between a rating that kept a show on the air and one that would cancel it was so small as to be statistically insignificant, and yet the show that just happened to get the higher rating would survive. In addition, the Nielsen ratings encouraged a strong push for demographic measurements. This caused problems with households that had multiple television sets or households where viewers would enter the simpler codes (usually their child's) raising serious questions to the quality of the demographic data. The situation further deteriorated as the popularity of cable television expanded the number of viewable networks to the point that the margin of error has increased, because the sampling sizes are too small. Compounding matters is the fact that of the sample data that is collected, advertisers will not pay for time shifted programs (those that are recorded for replay at a different time), rendering the "raw" numbers useless from a statistical point of view. Even in 2013, it was noted that Internet streams of television programs were still not counted because they had either no ads (such as Netflix) or totally different advertising (such as Hulu) than their television counterparts, effectively skewing the raw data on how popular a show really is.
A related criticism of the Nielsen ratings system is its lack of a system for measuring television audiences in environments outside the home, such as college dormitories, transport terminals, bars, jails and other public places where television is frequently viewed, often by large numbers of people in a common setting. In 2005, Nielsen announced plans to incorporate viewing by away-from-home college students into its sample. Internet television viewing is another rapidly growing market for which Nielsen ratings fail to account for viewers. iTunes, Hulu, YouTube, and some of the networks' own websites (such as ABC.com and CBS.com) provide full-length web-based programming, either subscription-based or ad-supported. Though web sites can already track popularity of a site and the referring page, they cannot track viewer demographics. To both track this and expand their market research offerings, Nielsen purchased NetRatings in 2007. However, as noted in a February 2012 New York Times article, the computer and mobile streams of a program are counted separately from the standard television broadcasts, further degrading the overall quality of the sampling data. As a result, there was no way for NBC to tell if there was any overlap between the roughly 111.3 million traditional television viewers and 2.1 million live stream viewers of Super Bowl XLVII.
Responding to the criticism regarding accusations by several media executives (including Viacom CEO Phillippe Dauman and former Fox Entertainment Group chief operating officer Chase Carey) that it failed to count viewers watching television programs on digital platforms, Nielsen executive vice president of global product leadership Megan Clarken stated in an April 2015 summit by the Coalition for Innovative Media Measurement that the company is able to count digital viewers in audience and demographic reports, but are unable to do so under the current set of rules devised by networks and advertising industries last revised in 2006. As such, Nielsen can only count viewership for television-originated broadcasts, and must exclude viewers who watch programs on digital platforms if the program does not have an identical advertising load or a linear watermark.
After Nielsen took over the contract for producing data on Irish advertising in 2009, agencies said that they were "disastrous" and claimed that the information produced by them is too inaccurate to be trusted by them or their clients.
In 2004, News Corporation retained the services of public relations firm Glover Park to launch a campaign aimed at delaying Nielsen's plan to replace its aging household electronic data collection methodology in larger local markets with its newer electronic People Meter system. The advocates in the public relations campaign charged that data derived from the newer People Meter system represented a bias toward underreporting minority viewing, which could lead to a de facto discrimination in employment against minority actors and writers. However, Nielsen countered the campaign by revealing its sample composition counts. According to Nielsen Media Research's sample composition counts, as of November 2004[update], nationwide, African American households using People Meters represented 6.7% of the Nielsen sample, compared to 6.0% in the general population. Latino households represent 5.7% of the Nielsen sample, compared to 5.0% in the general population. By October 2006, News Corporation and Nielsen settled, with Nielsen agreeing to spend an additional $50 million to ensure that minority viewing was not being underreported by the new electronic people meter system.
In 2011, CBS and Nielsen proposed a model consisting of six viewer segments which according to their empirical research are more relevant for advertisers than older models based on gender and age. The segments are based on user behavior, motivations, and psychographics. It is argued that the model can increase reaching the desired audience as well as message recall and advertisement likeability.
The program with the all-time highest average rating is in bold text
Sports programs have italicized rating numbers
Two or more programs tie for highest average Nielsen rating in the same season
The program with the all-time longest winning streak in Nielsen ratings based on number of consecutive seasons
- "Top 20 Network Shows, Rated 4 Ways, Announced by Nielsen" (PDF). Broadcasting-Telecasting. Broadcasting Publications, Inc. December 8, 1947. Retrieved October 26, 2014.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- Gary Levin (October 12, 2006). "Playback time for Nielsens". USA Today. Gannett Company. p. 1D.
- "Nielsen Reverses Decline in U.S. TV Homes". Variety. Penske Media Corporation. May 7, 2013. Retrieved April 28, 2014.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- Frank Baker (February 12, 2009). "What is a RATING". Media Literacy Clearinghouse. Retrieved March 2, 2009.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- Lisa de Moraes (August 13, 2004). "Where's the Love? CNBC Scrambles to Woo Viewers for 'McEnroe'". The Washington Post. The Washington Post Company. Retrieved June 8, 2007.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- "Nielsen trends: Total audience measurement". CNN Money. December 3, 2014.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- Michael Storey (April 23, 2009). "THE TV COLUMN: Not in 18–49 age group? TV execs write you off". Arkansas Democrat Gazette. Retrieved May 2, 2008.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- Bill Carter (April 6, 2010). "An 'Idol' Ratings Loss, but Not in Its Pocketbook". The New York Times. The New York Times Company. Retrieved April 8, 2010.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- Rosario Santiago (October 3, 2007). "For Advertising Purposes, 'Grey's Anatomy' May Well be Colored Green". BuddyTV. Retrieved May 3, 2009.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- Brian Steinberg (October 18, 2010). "Simon Who? 'Idol' Spots Still Priciest in Prime Time". Advertising Age. Retrieved October 28, 2010.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- Gary Holmeys (January 16, 2006). "Nielsen Announces Schedule And Plan For Commercial-Minute Ratings". Nielsen Media Research. Retrieved July 2, 2007.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>[dead link]
- Jon Lafayette (October 7, 2007). "Commercial Ratings Shuffle the Deck". Television Week. Retrieved May 13, 2008.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- Anthony Crupi (November 14, 2012). "C3POh No! Broadcasters Agitate for Better Ratings Currency". AdWeek. Retrieved April 9, 2013.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- "Television Measurement | TV Ratings". Retrieved June 2, 2014.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- Alan Pergament (August 6, 2014). "Summertime, when the leaving is easy to figure out". The Buffalo News. BH Media Group, LLC. Retrieved August 6, 2014.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- "For the TV Station Business, Sweeps Stakes Are Still High". Broadcasting & Cablepublisher=NewBay Media. February 17, 2014. p. 34.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- "Nielsen "Sweeps" Months" (PDF). Nielsen Holdings. 2012. Retrieved April 12, 2012.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- "Local Survey Dates for the 2014-2015 Television Season" (PDF). TVB. Retrieved July 30, 2014.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- Aline van Duynin (June 15, 2006). "Digital TV Prompts Nielsen Ratings Revamp". Financial Times. Retrieved February 12, 2014.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- "Can You Believe TV Ratings?". Nova / Horizon. February 18, 1992. PBS.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- Andrea Segal (April 26, 2007). "Nielsen Ratings: An Inaccurate Truth". The Cornell Daily Sun. Retrieved January 19, 2008.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- John Herrman (January 31, 2011). "Why Nielsen Ratings Are Inaccurate, and Why They'll Stay That Way". Splitsider. Retrieved April 28, 2012.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- Gary Levin (April 25, 2007). "Networks' top shows at a rating loss". USA Today. Gannett Company. p. 1D.
- Brian Stelter (February 21, 2013). "Nielsen Adjusts Its Ratings to Add Web-Linked TVs". The New York Times. The New York Times Company.
- "Briefing: Nielsen to purchase all NetRatings shares". International Herald Tribune. The New York Times Company. February 5, 2007. Retrieved October 10, 2008.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- Brian Stelter (February 8, 2012). "Youths Are Watching, but Less Often on TV". The New York Times. The New York Times Company.
- David Lieberman (April 22, 2015). "Nielsen Says Industry Rules Bar It From Including Digital Viewers In TV Ratings". Deadline.com. Mail.com Media.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- Laura Noonan (February 4, 2010). "Media agencies losing trust in Nielsen for supply of critical data". Independent.ie. Retrieved June 17, 2011.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- Michael Learmonth (October 26, 2006). "Rupe ends Nielsen tiff". Encyclopedia.com. Retrieved April 20, 2009.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles> (subscription required)
- Jack Neff (March 23, 2011). "CBS: Viewers' Age and Sex Shouldn't Matter to Marketers". Advertising Age.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- Alex McNeil (1996). Total Television (4th ed.). New York City, New York: Penguin Books. pp. 1143–1161. ISBN 0-14-024916-8.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- "2003-04 Season To Date Program Rankings from September 22, 2003 Through May 30, 2004". ABC Medianet. 2004-06-02. Archived from the original on February 8, 2007. Retrieved November 24, 2006.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- Tim Brooks; Earle Marsh (2007). The Complete Directory to Prime Time Network and Cable TV Shows, 1946–present. New York City, New York: Ballantine. p. 1679-1698. ISBN 978-0-345-49773-4.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- Nellie Andreeva (May 27, 2011). "Full 2010-11 Season Series Rankers". Deadline.com. Mail.com Media. Retrieved May 27, 2011.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- "Top-Rated Programs by Season (2007-Present)". TimBrooks.net.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- "How Does "Sweeps" Week Work?". Slate. February 16, 2004.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>