Origin of the Book of Mormon

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search
Artist's impression of Joseph Smith receiving the golden plates from the angel Moroni.

Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found. There are several theories as to the actual origin of the Book of Mormon. Most adherents to the Latter Day Saint movement view the book as a work of inspired scripture. The most common theory accepted by adherents is that promoted by Joseph Smith, who said he translated the work from an ancient set of golden plates inscribed by prophets, which Smith discovered near his home in Palmyra, New York, in the 1820s after being told to go there by the angel Moroni, a prophet in the Book of Mormon narrative. Besides Smith himself, there were more than 11 witnesses who said they saw the plates physically (three claiming to have been visited by an angel as well) in 1829. There were also several other witnesses, some of them friendly to Smith and some hostile, who observed him dictating the text that eventually became the Book of Mormon.

Nevertheless, critics have explored a number of issues, including (1) whether Joseph Smith actually had golden plates, or whether the text of the Book of Mormon originated in his mind or through inspiration; (2) whether it was Smith himself who composed the book's text, or whether an associate of Smith's such as Oliver Cowdery or Sidney Rigdon could have composed the text; and (3) whether the book was based on prior works such as the View of the Hebrews, the Spalding Manuscript, or the Bible.

Theories of authorship

There are differing views on the origin of the Book of Mormon.

  1. Miraculous origins theories generally accept Joseph Smith's own account that he translated an ancient record[1] compiled and abridged by Mormon, a pre-Columbian resident of the Western Hemisphere who recorded the spiritual history of generations of his people, and the teachings of their ancestors, the Hebrews.
    Variations on the miraculous origin theory include the view that the work is a divinely inspired narrative regardless of its historicity (i.e., "Inspired Fiction").[2] or that the book was written by Smith through a process known as "automatic writing."[3]
  2. Joseph Smith as the sole author, without intentional assistance. One line of thinking proposed by several authors is that the Book of Mormon is a "primary source" reflecting events in Smith's own life.[4]
  3. Theories of multiple authors argue Smith collaborated with others to produce the Book of Mormon. These theories generally cite Book of Mormon scribe Oliver Cowdrey or Sidney Rigdon as potential co-authors.

Miraculous origin theory

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

Smith sitting on a wooden chair with his face in a hat
A depiction of Joseph Smith dictating the Book of Mormon by peering into a hat.

According to the accounts of Joseph Smith and his associates, the original record was engraved on thin, malleable sheets of metal with the appearance of gold and bound with three rings at one edge. The leaves were engraved on both sides with considerable skill. According to the account presented in the book, the prophet-historian named Mormon abridged the records of the local civilizations from the preceding thousand years.[5] Mormon then delivered the account to his son, Moroni, who added a few words of his own and concealed the plates about AD 400.[6] Near the end of Moroni's life (approximately AD 421), he placed these plates along with several other items in a stone box in a hillside (now named Cumorah) near present-day Palmyra, New York.

Then, by Smith's account, on September 21, 1823, this same Moroni, then a resurrected being, appeared to Smith to instruct him about this ancient record and its destined translation into the English language.[6] Smith was shown the location of the plates (including the other items in the box), but was not immediately allowed to take them. After four years of meeting with the angel and being instructed, Smith was entrusted with possession of the plates. Through the power of God and the Urim and Thummim, which were ancient seeing stones hidden along with the plates, he was able to translate the characters (which, according to the Book of Mormon, were written in Reformed Egyptian[7] into English.[8] Smith was commanded to show the plates to several people and no one else. Accounts by these individuals are recorded in the front of the Book of Mormon as "The Testimony of the Three Witnesses" and "The Testimony of the Eight Witnesses."

Smith taught—and most Mormons believe—that the existence of the Book of Mormon was prophesied by Biblical scripture.[9]

Rigdon's son John, discussing an interview with his father in 1865, states:

My father, after I had finished saying what I have repeated above, looked at me a moment, raised his hand above his head and slowly said, with tears glistening in his eyes: "My son, I can swear before high heaven that what I have told you about the origin of [the Book of Mormon] is true. Your mother and sister, Mrs. Athalia Robinson, were present when that book was handed to me in Mentor, Ohio, and all I ever knew about the origin of [the Book of Mormon] was what Parley P. Pratt, Oliver Cowdery, Joseph Smith and the witnesses who claimed they saw the plates have told me, and in all of my intimacy with Joseph Smith he never told me but one story."[10]

Apologists of the Book of Mormon do not find the instances of purported plagiarism troubling; to the contrary, they feel that the repetition further proves the authenticity of the Book of Mormon[11]—that God reveals similar, if not the same teachings, to all people since he is "the same yesterday, and to day, and for ever"[12] and that the repetition fulfills prophecy that "in the mouth of two or three witnesses shall every word be established".[13] LDS Church President Spencer W. Kimball stated, "Prophets say the same things because we face basically the same problems"[14] and that "warnings must be repeated. Just because a truth is repeated does not make that truth any less important or true. Indeed, the opposite is true."[15]

Smith as sole author

According to the Smith-as-sole-author hypothesis, the Book of Mormon was written by Joseph Smith without the intentional complicity of anyone else. These theories argue that the simplest explanation is that Smith authored the Book of Mormon himself. [16]

It is argued that the Book of Mormon reflects experiences in Smith's life. For example, the tree of life vision in the Book of Mormon has parallels with a dream Joseph Smith, Sr. had (as recorded in 1845 by Lucy Mack Smith).[17][18]

The golden plates were sometimes called the "Golden Bible," in early descriptions. The label "Golden Bible" predates the Book of Mormon, as legends of such an artifact circulated in Canada and upstate New York while Smith was growing up in Vermont.[19] Smith companion Peter Ingersoll later claimed that Smith had told him of the legend of the Canadian Golden Bible.[20][21]

Theories of multiple authors

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

According to this family of theories, Smith was aided in the creation of the Book of Mormon by one or more co-authors. Sidney Rigdon and Oliver Cowdery have been posited as possible authors or co-authors. Both Rigdon and Cowdery had more formal education than Smith and these theories argue that either could have helped Smith author the book.

The author David Persuitte, in suggesting evidence for the multiple-authors theory, points to a revelation of Smith's, dated March 1829, that apparently limited Smith's power to translation. Persuitte argues that the wording indicates at least one other collaborating but secret author, since such a self-imposed limitation would make sense "if he had some partners who had imposed it upon him in order to prevent him from gathering too much power to himself."[22]

In contrast, co-authors Jerald and Sandra Tanner argue the early text of the revelation merely demonstrates that "Joseph Smith was not planning on doing any other work besides the Book of Mormon".[23]

Oliver Cowdery

Oliver Cowdery

Oliver Cowdery was a third-cousin of Lucy Mack Smith, Joseph Smith's mother. A pastor who lived near Cowdery, Ethan Smith, had written View of the Hebrews, a work that is sometimes argued to have been a source for the Book of Mormon. Cowdery served as scribe during the transcription of the Book of Mormon and he served as one of the Three Witnesses to the golden plates.

Sidney Rigdon

Sidney Rigdon

Sidney Rigdon was a Baptist preacher who became prominent among Smith's earliest followers. Rigdon served as a scribe for the production of the Book of Moses,[24] received revelations jointly with Smith, served as Smith's spokesperson, and with Smith carried the title "Prophet, Seer, and Revelator". After Smith's death, Rigdon led his own faction of Latter Day Saints and continued to announce revelations.

However, there is little or no extant evidence that Smith knew of or was in contact with Rigdon until after the Book of Mormon was published, although some witness accounts place Rigdon in upstate New York in 1825 and 1826. Most histories state that Rigdon learned of the Book of Mormon from Parley P. Pratt, a member of Rigdon's Kirtland, Ohio, congregation, who had joined the Latter Day Saints in September 1830 in Palmyra. Upon Pratt's return to Ohio, Rigdon reportedly learned of Smith and the Book of Mormon and was baptized by Pratt. According to these histories, only after his own baptism did Rigdon travel to New York, where he first met Smith in December 1830, nine months after the Book of Mormon's publication.

Purported sources

Those who reject the miraculous origin theory of the Book of Mormon cite a number of works that could have served as sources for the Book of Mormon.[25][26][27]

King James Version of the Bible

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

Those who reject the miraculous origin theory believe that the King James Bible was used as a source for the Book of Mormon.[28][29] Examples of alleged parallels include:[29][30]

King James Bible Book of Mormon (1830)
"For, behold, the day cometh, that shall burn as an oven; and all the proud, yea, and all that do wickedly, shall be stubble: and the day that cometh shall burn them up" (Malachi 4:1) "For behold, saith the prophet, ... the day soon cometh that all the proud and they who do wickedly shall be as stubble; and the day cometh that they must be burned" (1 Nephi 22:15)
"[T]he axe is laid unto the root of the trees; therefore every tree which bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire" (Matthew 3:10) "[T]he ax is laid at the root of the tree; therefore every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit shall be hewn down and cast into the fire" (Alma 5:52)
"[B]e steadfast and immovable, always abounding in good works" (1 Corinthians 15:58) "[B]e ye steadfast, unmoveable, always abounding in the work of the Lord" (Mosiah 5:15)

In the Book of Mormon, the prophet Nephi explicitly quotes the Book of Isaiah. Segments of the Book of Mormon—for example 1 Nephi chapters 20–21 and 2 Nephi chapters 7–8 and 12–24—match nearly word-for-word chapters 48:1–52:2 and 2–14 (respectively) of the King James Version (1611) of the Book of Isaiah. In addition, 58 quotes from Isaiah found in the Book of Mormon are paraphrased versions of those found in the King James Version.[31] Other parallels include Mosiah chapter 14 matching KJV Isaiah 53; 3 Nephi chapter 22 matching KJV Isaiah 54; 3 Nephi chapters 24–25 matching KJV Malachi 3–4; and 3 Nephi chapters 12–14 matching KJV Matthew 5–7. In total, there exist 478 verses in the Book of Mormon which are quoted in some form from the book of Isaiah.[31]

The majority of modern scholars have accepted that the sources used for the King James Version are no longer the earliest or most reliable sources (e.g., see Alexandrian text-type and Dead Sea scrolls). The Book of Mormon claims to have been written over 1100 years prior to the King James Version, but it contains some of the same errors. One example is Mark 16:15-18, which is quoted nearly word-for-word in Mormon 9:22-24. The passage concerns believers holding snakes and drinking poison; however, it does not appear in many early biblical manuscripts and is widely believed to have been composed in the 2nd century.[32] Additionally, the Book of Mormon reflects KJV literary and linguistic style. The KJV was the most commonly used translation of the Bible when the Book of Mormon was produced.

Apocrypha

It has been claimed that the books of the Apocrypha were a source for the Book of Mormon. In particular, 2 Maccabees includes the name "Nephi".[33][34] Examples of other parallels include:[30][34]

Apocrypha Book of Mormon (1830)
"We will assay to abridge in one volume.... labouring to follow the rules of an abridgment.... But to use brevity ... is to be granted to him that will make an abridgement." (2 Maccabees 2:25-31) "I make an abridgement of the record ... after I have abridged the record.... I had made an abridgement from the plates of Nephi.... I write a small abridgement." (1 Nephi 1:17, Words of Mormon 3, 5:9)
"They commanded that this writing should be put in tables of brass, and that they should be set ... in a conspicuous place; Also that the copies thereof should be laid up in the treasury" (1 Maccabees 14:48-49) "And I commanded him ... that he should go with me into the treasury ... I also spake unto him that I should carry the engravings, which were upon the plates of brass" (1 Nephi 4:20,24)
"Then the king, in closing the place, made it holy ... many men call it Nephi". (2 Maccabees 1:34,36) "And my people would that we should call the name of the place Nephi; wherefore we did call it Nephi". (2 Nephi 5:8)
"And it came to pass ... I dreamed a dream by night" (2 Esdras 13:1) "And it came to pass ... Behold, I have dreamed a dream" (1 Nephi 8:2)

Spalding's "Manuscript Found"

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

In 1834, E. D. Howe in his book Mormonism Unvailed introduced a theory which claimed Smith plagiarized material from the manuscript for an unpublished novel by Solomon Spaulding. Howe had the manuscript in his possession at the time of publication. Spaulding's story, called "Manuscript Story", revolves around a group of seafaring Romans who sail to the New World around two millennia ago.[10] Critics long speculated that Smith had access to the original script and that Smith he plagiarized heavily from it in writing the Book of Mormon. The only known Spalding manuscript, "Manuscript Story", was discovered in 1884 and now resides at Oberlin College in Ohio.[10] Once the manuscript was available for study, most critics discarded this theory because the "extensive parallels" previously thought to exist consisted only of a few minor details: intercontinental seafaring, the existence (and use) of a seer stone, and the discovery of records under a stone (Latin parchments in the Spaulding manuscript, golden plates with "reformed Egyptian" writing according to Smith). Most of the other purported similarities, attested to by various witnesses in affidavits gathered by Doctor Philastus Hurlbut, were not found to exist. Historian Fawn Brodie expressed suspicion regarding these affidavits, claiming that the style of the statements was too similar and displayed too much uniformity.[35]

Some have suggested that the discrepancies can be explained by the fact that "Manuscript Story" was a different document than "Manuscript Found", which has ironically still not been found.

View of the Hebrews

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

One purported source of the Book of Mormon is View of the Hebrews, first published in 1823 by Ethan Smith, a pastor of a church in Poultney, Vermont, who was of no relation to Joseph Smith.[36] It is argued that the works share several passages and many thematic elements.[27][37] Examples of alleged parallels include:[27][30]

View of the Hebrews by Ethan Smith (1825 edition) Book of Mormon (1830)
"[T]hose far distant savages have (as have all other tribes) their Great Spirit, who made everything" (p. 103) "Believest thou that this Great Spirit which is God, created all things ... And he saith, Yea, I believe that he created all things" (Alma 18:28–29)
"[T]he places ... are noted; among which are 'the isles of the sea'". (p. 232-233) "[W]e have been led to a better land, ... [W]e are upon an isle of the sea" (2 Nephi 10:20)
" 'I will hiss for them' God is represented as hissing for a people. ... [To] behold the banner of salvation now erected for his ancient people.... This standard of salvation." (p. 235,241–242) "[M]y words shall hiss forth unto the ends of the earth, for a standard unto my people, which are of the House of Israel." (2 Nephi 29:2)

Ethan Smith was a pastor of a church in Poultney, Vermont, which was attended by Book of Mormon witness and scribe Oliver Cowdery. View of the Hebrews was first published in 1823, seven years before the publication of the Book of Mormon.[36]

In the early 20th century, Mormon apologist B. H. Roberts authored a manuscript titled Studies of the Book of Mormon,[38] in which he compared the content of the Book of Mormon with View of the Hebrews. Roberts's conclusion was that, assuming a hemispheric geography theory for the Book of Mormon, sufficient parallels existed that future critics could claim that View of the Hebrews could have provided a structural foundation for the Book of Mormon story.[39] Roberts's manuscript was private and shared only with church leadership at the time he did the analysis. Publicly, Roberts continued to support the miraculous origin theory of the Book of Mormon.[40]

Roberts's list of parallels included:

  • extensive quotation from the prophecies of Isaiah in the Old Testament;
  • the Israelite origin of the American Indian;
  • the future gathering of Israel and restoration of the Ten Lost Tribes;
  • the peopling of the New World from the Old via a long journey northward which encountered "seas" of "many waters;"
  • a religious motive for the migration;
  • the division of the migrants into civilized and uncivilized groups with long wars between them and the eventual destruction of the civilized by the uncivilized;
  • the assumption that all native peoples were descended from Israelites and their languages from Hebrew;
  • the burial of a "lost book" with "yellow leaves;"
  • the description of extensive military fortifications with military observatories or "watch towers" overlooking them;
  • a change from monarchy to republican forms of government; and
  • the preaching of the gospel in ancient America.[41]

David Persuitte has presented a large number of parallels between passages in View of the Hebrews and the Book of Mormon, but notes that there are no instances of direct copying. The parallels between the two books that Persuitte presents cover a broad range of topics, including religious ideas about the responsibility of the American people in convincing the Indians of their "Israelite" origins and converting them to Christianity. Persuitte quotes from View of the Hebrews Ethan Smith's theory about what happened to the ancient Israelites after they arrived in America. That theory is also essentially a summary of the basic story line of the Book of Mormon, including the idea that the ancient Israelite immigrants to America split into two factions: a civilized group and a savage group that subsequently exterminated the civilized group. Persuitte also quotes from the two books several similar descriptions of structures built by the civilized faction and wars that were fought between the two factions, as well as numerous other similarities. According to Persuitte, the ideas that can be found in View of the Hebrews are sufficient to have "inspired" Joseph Smith to have written the Book of Mormon had he read it.[42] Joseph Smith himself mentioned Ethan Smith and cited passages from View of the Hebrews in an article published in the Times and Seasons in June 1842.[43]

Oliver Cowdery's family members were members of Ethan Smith's congregation in Poultney when he arrived and assumed leadership in November 1821. Even prior to his book's publication, Ethan Smith advocated his views regarding the origins of Native Americans in sermons to his congregations. In 1825, Ethan Smith published the much-enlarged second edition of View of the Hebrews, the same year that Cowdery left Poultney for New York State.

The Wonders of Nature

Critics have claimed that Smith based several passages and thematic material in the Book of Mormon on material he found in The Wonders of Nature, published in 1825 by Josiah Priest.[26][30] Examples of alleged parallels include:[26][30]

The Wonders of Nature by Josiah Priest (1825) Book of Mormon (1830)
"a narrow neck of land is interposed betwixt two vast oceans" (p. 598) "the narrow neck of land, by the place where the sea divides the land" (Ether 10:20)
"From whence no traveller returns" (p. 469) "from whence no traveller can return" (2 Nephi 1:14)
"Darkness which may be felt.... vapours ... so thick as to prevent the rays of the sun from penetrating an extraordinary thick mist. ... no artificial light could be procured ... vapours would prevent lamps, etc. from burning. ... [T]he darkness lasted for three days." (p. 524) "[They] could feel the vapour of darkness, and there could be no light ... neither candles, neither torches, ... neither the sun ... for so great were the mists of darkness ... [I]t did last for the space of three days." (3 Nephi 8:20–23)

The Golden Pot

The Golden Pot: A Modern Fairytale is a novella by German author E. T. A. Hoffmann, first published in 1814. It has been suggested as an inspiration for the story of the golden plates.[44] Much of the narrative occurs in the imagination of the protagonist Anselmus. Alleged similarities include:

  • Anselmus encounters Archivarius Lindhorst, the last archivist of Atlantis.
  • Archivarius Lindhorst is a guardian of ancient treasures (like Moroni)
  • Significant events occur on the fall equinox
  • Anselmus receives a gold record and asked to decipher the writing on it.

The Late War

The Late War is an account of the War of 1812 which is written in the style of the King James Bible. The 2008 work Mormon Parallels and a 2010 work[45] have discussed possible similarities between the two works. In 2013, The Late War was the subject of discussion among both ex-Mormons and Mormon apologists.[46][47]

See also

Notes

  1. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  2. Price 2002, p. 68
  3. Dunn 2002, pp. 29, 33 Dunn concludes, "It is clear that Smith's translation experience fits comfortably within the larger world of scrying, channeling, and automatic writing."
  4. Vogel 2004
  5. Words of Mormon 1:3–6.
  6. 6.0 6.1 Book of Mormon Introduction.
  7. According to Mormon 9:32-34
  8. See Joseph Smith–History 1 for a complete record of Smith's account.
  9. Mormons believe that the following biblical passages prophesy or otherwise support the existence of the Book of Mormon: Psalm 85:11; Ezekiel 37:15–20; John 10: 15–16; 2 Corinthians 13:1; Revelation 14:6–7.
  10. 10.0 10.1 10.2 Spaulding 1996
  11. McConkie, B.R. (1966). Mormon Doctrine. Deseret Book: Salt Lake City.
  12. Hebrews 13:8, KJV
  13. 2 Corinthians 13:1, KJV
  14. Spencer W. Kimball, "The Stone Cut without Hands", Ensign, p. 6.
  15. Spencer W. Kimball, "President Kimball Speaks Out on Planning Your Life", Tambuli, June 1982.
  16. For argument regarding Joseph's authorship, see Robert A. Rees,"The Book of Mormon and Automatic Writing", Journal of Book of Mormon Studies, 15/1 (2006)
  17. http://en.fairmormon.org/Book_of_Mormon/Plagiarism_accusations/Joseph_Smith,_Sr.%27s_dream_and_Lehi%27s_vision
  18. Fawn M. Brodie, No Man Knows My History: The Life of Joseph Smith (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1945) p. 58; Hal Hougey, The Truth About the "Lehi Tree-of-Life" Stone (Concord: Pacific Publishing Co., 1963); Grant H. Palmer, An Insider's View of Mormon Origins (Salt Lake City, Utah: Signature Books, 2002) pp. 70–71; Dan Vogel, Joseph Smith: The Making of a Prophet (Salt Lake City, utah: Signature Books, 2004).
  19. Bushman 2005.
  20. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  21. http://www.solomonspalding.com/docs/1834howf.htm
  22. David Persuitte, Joseph Smith and the Origins of The Book of Mormon, 2d ed., p. 18.
  23. http://www.utlm.org/onlinebooks/changingtherevelations.htm
  24. http://emp.byui.edu/OpenshawR/Pearl%20of%20Great%20Price/Development%20The%20Book%20of%20%20Moses%20%20Matthews.htm
  25. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  26. 26.0 26.1 26.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  27. 27.0 27.1 27.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  28. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  29. 29.0 29.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  30. 30.0 30.1 30.2 30.3 30.4 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  31. 31.0 31.1 Tvedtnes 1984
  32. See the New International Version Bible, 1984, Mark 16: "The most reliable early manuscripts and other ancient witnesses do not have Mark 16:9–20."
  33. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  34. 34.0 34.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  35. For arguments regarding Manuscript Story, see Brown, Matthew, "Solomon Spaulding and the Book of Mormon"
  36. 36.0 36.1 Brodie 1971, pp. 46–49
  37. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  38. Roberts 1985
  39. Roberts 1985, p. 326
  40. B. H. Roberts, New Witnesses for God, 3 vols. [Salt Lake City: Deseret News, 1909], 3:89-90.
  41. Grant H. Palmer, An Insider's View of Mormon Origins (Salt Lake City, Utah: Signature Books, 2002), 60–64.
  42. Persuitte 2000
  43. Joseph Smith, Times and Seasons 3:15 (1 June 1842): 813–15.
  44. For argument regarding "The Golden Pot: A Modern Fairy Tale, see "Book of Mormon/Authorship theories/Golden Pot"
  45. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  46. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  47. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

References

  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found..
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found..
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found..
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found..
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found..
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found..
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found..
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found..
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found..
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found..
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found..
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found..
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found..
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found..
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found..
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found..
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found..
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found..
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found..
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found..
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found..
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found..
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found..
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found..
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found..

Further reading

  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.