Political views of Adolf Hitler

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search
Adolf Hitler in 1933

Historians and biographers note some difficulty in identifying Adolf Hitler's political views. His writings and methods were often adapted to need and circumstance, although there were some steady themes, including antisemitism, anti-communism, anti-parliamentarianism, German expansionism, belief in the superiority of an "Aryan race" and an extreme form of German nationalism. Hitler personally claimed he was fighting against Jewish Marxism.[1]

Hitler's views were more or less formed during three periods: (1) His years as a poverty-stricken young man in Vienna and Munich prior to World War I, during which he turned to nationalist-oriented political pamphlets and antisemitic newspapers out of distrust for mainstream newspapers and political parties; (2) The closing months of World War I when Germany lost the war; Hitler is said to have developed his extreme nationalism during this time, desiring to "save" Germany from both external and internal "enemies" who, in his view, betrayed it; (3) The 1920s, during which his early political career began and he wrote Mein Kampf. Hitler formally renounced his Austrian citizenship on 7 April 1925, but did not acquire German citizenship until almost seven years later; thereby allowing him to run for public office. Hitler was influenced by Benito Mussolini who was appointed Prime Minister of Italy in October 1922 after his "March on Rome".[2]

In many ways, Adolf Hitler epitomizes "the force of personality in political life" as mentioned by Friedrich Meinecke.[3] He was essential to the very framework of Nazism's political appeal and its manifestation in Germany. So important were Hitler's views that they immediately affected the political policies of Nazi Germany. He asserted the Führerprinzip ("Leader principle"). The principle relied on absolute obedience of all subordinates to their superiors. Hitler viewed the party structure and later the government structure as a pyramid, with himself—the infallible leader—at the apex.[4]

Hitler firmly believed that the force of "will" was decisive in determining the political course for a nation and rationalized his actions accordingly. Given that Hitler was appointed "leader of the German Reich for life", he "embodied the supreme power of the state and, as the delegate of the German people", it was his role to determine the "outward form and structure of the Reich."[5] To that end, Hitler's political motivation consisted of an ideology that combined traditional German and Austrian anti-Semitism with an intellectualized racial doctrine resting on a platter of social Darwinism. Further complicating matters, Hitler's views were also shaped by an "ill-digested" mix of Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, Wagner, Gobineau, Sorel, H.S. Chamberlain, Paul de Lagarde, Alfred Ploetz and other racial hygiene theorists; all under the banner of the swastika.[6]

Army intelligence agent

After World War I, Hitler stayed in the army, which was mainly engaged in suppressing socialist uprisings across Germany, including in Munich, where Hitler returned in 1919. He took part in "national thinking" courses organised by the Education and Propaganda Department (Dept Ib/P) of the Bavarian Reichswehr, Headquarters 4 under Captain Karl Mayr.[7] Mayr recruited Hitler to help re-educate soldiers in the wake of the social revolution occurring across Germany. The aforementioned specialized courses took place at the University of Munich in June 1919, where Hitler heard lectures on Germany's economic situation, the political history of the war and other matters, all delivered in an anti-Bolshevik disposition, inciting him to proselytize nationalist messages to his comrades.[8] These helped popularize the notion that there was a scapegoat responsible for the outbreak of war and Germany's defeat. Hitler's own bitterness over the collapse of the war effort also began to shape his ideology.[9] Like other German nationalists, he believed the Dolchstoßlegende (stab-in-the-back myth), which claimed that the German Army, "undefeated in the field", had been "stabbed in the back" on the home front by civilian leaders and Marxists, later dubbed the "November criminals".[10] "International Jewry" was described as a scourge composed of communists bent on destroying Germany.[11] Such scapegoating was essential to Hitler's political career, and it seems that he genuinely believed that Jews were responsible for Germany's post-war troubles.[12]

In July 1919 Hitler was appointed Verbindungsmann (intelligence agent) of an Aufklärungskommando (reconnaissance commando) of the Reichswehr, both to influence other soldiers and to infiltrate the German Workers' Party (DAP).[13][14] Much like the political activists in the DAP, Hitler blamed the loss of the First World War on Jewish intrigue at home and abroad, espousing völkisch-nationalist political beliefs with the intention of resurrecting Germany’s greatness by smashing the Versailles Treaty. Along those lines, Hitler proclaimed that the "German yoke must be broken by German iron" (Das deutsche Elend muß durch deutsches Eisen zerbrochen werden).[15]

German Workers' Party

Adolf Hitler's membership card for the German Workers' Party.

In September 1919 Hitler wrote what is often deemed his first antisemitic text, requested by Mayr as a reply to an inquiry by Adolf Gemlich, who had participated in the same "educational courses" as Hitler. In this report Hitler argued for a "rational anti-Semitism" which would not resort to pogroms, but instead "legally fight and remove the privileges enjoyed by the Jews as opposed to other foreigners living among us. Its final goal, however, must be the irrevocable removal of the Jews themselves."[16][17] Most people at the time understood this as a call for forced expulsion. Europe has a long history of expelling Jews and the auto-da-fé of the Inquisition.[18]

Further, while he studied the activities of the DAP, Hitler became impressed with founder Anton Drexler's antisemitic, nationalist, anti-capitalist and anti-Marxist ideas.[13] Drexler was impressed with Hitler's oratory skills, and invited him to join the DAP. Hitler accepted on 12 September 1919,[19] becoming the party's 55th member.[20] Hitler was discharged from the army on 31 March 1920 and began working full-time for the NSDAP.[21] Displaying his talent for oratory and propaganda skills, with the support of Drexler, Hitler became chief of propaganda for the party in early 1920. When early party members promulgated their 25-point manifesto on 24 February 1920 (co-authored by Hitler, Anton Drexler, Gottfried Feder, and Dietrich Eckart), it was Hitler who penned the first point, revealing his intention to unify German-speaking peoples, claiming that the party demanded, "all Germans be gathered together in a Greater Germany on the basis of the right of all peoples to self-determination."[22] By the spring of 1920 he engineered the change of name to the National Socialist German Workers' Party (Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei – NSDAP), commonly known as the Nazi Party. In the same period, under his influence the party adopted a modified swastika (a well-known good luck charm which had previously been used in Germany as a mark of volkishness and "Aryanism") along with the Roman salute used by Italian fascists.[23] At this time the Nazi Party was one of many small extremist groups in Munich, but Hitler's vitriolic beer hall speeches began attracting regular audiences.[24] He became adept at using populist themes, including the use of scapegoats, who were blamed for his listeners' economic hardships.[25] He gained notoriety for his rowdy polemic speeches against the Treaty of Versailles, rival politicians, and especially against Marxists and Jews.[24] Hitler used personal magnetism and an understanding of crowd psychology to advantage while engaged in public speaking.[26][27]

In June 1921, while Hitler and Eckart were on a fundraising trip to Berlin, a mutiny broke out within the NSDAP in Munich. Members of its executive committee wanted to merge with the rival German Socialist Party (DSP).[28] Hitler returned to Munich on 11 July and angrily tendered his resignation. The committee members realised that the resignation of their leading public figure and speaker would mean the end of the party.[29] Hitler announced he would rejoin on the condition that he would replace Drexler as party chairman, and that the party headquarters would remain in Munich.[30] They capitulated to Hitler's demand and on 29 July 1921 a special congress was convened to formalize Hitler as the new chairman; the vote was 543 for Hitler and one against.[31]

He asserted the Führerprinzip ("Leader principle"). The principle relied on absolute obedience of all subordinates to their superiors; thus he viewed the party structure and later the government structure as a pyramid, with himself—the infallible leader—at the apex. Rank in the party was not determined by elections—positions were filled through appointment by those of higher rank, who demanded unquestioning obedience to the will of the leader.[4]

Early followers included:

<templatestyles src="Div col/styles.css"/>

The Beer Hall Putsch

Hitler enlisted the help of World War I General Erich Ludendorff to try to seize power in Munich (the capital of Bavaria) in an attempt later known as the Beer Hall Putsch of 8–9 November 1923.[34] This would be a step in the seizure of power nationwide, overthrowing the Weimar Republic in Berlin. On 8 November, Hitler's forces initially succeeded in occupying the local Reichswehr and police headquarters; however, neither the army nor the state police joined forces with him.[35] The next day, Hitler and his followers marched from the beer hall to the Bavarian War Ministry to overthrow the Bavarian government on their "March on Berlin". Hitler wanted to emulate Benito Mussolini's "March on Rome" (1922) by staging his own coup in Bavaria to be followed by a challenge to the government in Berlin. However, the Bavarian authorities ordered the police to stand their ground. The putschists were dispersed after a short firefight in the streets near the Feldherrnhalle.[36] In all, Sixteen NSDAP members and four police officers were killed in the failed coup.[37]

Hitler fled to the home of Ernst Hanfstaengl, and by some accounts he contemplated suicide; this state of mind has been disputed.[38] Hitler was depressed but calm when he was arrested on 11 November 1923.[39] Fearing "left-wing" members of the Nazi Party might try to seize leadership from him during his incarceration, Hitler quickly appointed Alfred Rosenberg temporary leader.[40]

Mein Kampf

Beginning in February 1924, Hitler was tried for high treason before the special People's Court in Munich.[39] He used his trial as an opportunity to spread his message throughout Germany. At one point during the trial, Hitler discussed political leadership, during which he stated that leading people was not a matter of political science (Staatswissenschaft) but an innate ability, one of statecraft (Staatskunst).[41] He further elaborated by claiming that out of ten thousand politicians only one Bismarck emerged, subtly implying that he too had been born with this gift; continuing, he declared that it was not Karl Marx who stirred the masses and ignited the Russian Revolution but Lenin, not making his appeal to the mind but to the senses.[42] His rousing speeches during the trial made Hitler famous, but they did not exonerate him. In April 1924 he was sentenced to five years' imprisonment in Landsberg Prison, where he received preferential treatment from sympathetic guards and received substantial quantities of fan mail, including funds and other assistance. During 1923 and 1924 at Landsberg he dictated the first volume of Mein Kampf (My Struggle; originally entitled Four and a Half Years of Struggle against Lies, Stupidity, and Cowardice) to his deputy, Rudolf Hess;[43] his publisher shortened the title to Mein Kampf.[44]

The book, dedicated to Thule Society member Dietrich Eckart, was an autobiography and exposition of his ideology. In Mein Kampf Hitler speaks at length about his youth, his early days in the Nazi Party, general ideas on politics, including the transformation of German society into one based on race; some passages implied genocide.[45] Published in two volumes in 1925 and 1926, it sold 228,000 copies between 1925 and 1932. In 1933, Hitler's first year in office, 1,000,000 copies were sold.[46] The book acts as a reference, giving insight into the world view from which Hitler never wavered throughout his life.[47][48]

It states that during his childhood, Hitler had little interest in politics, as he had ambitions to become a painter. Like other boys in his part of Austria, he was attracted to Pan-Germanism, but his intellectual pursuits were generally those of an dilettante. Hitler portrays himself as a born leader interested in knightly adventures, exploration, and who by the time he was eleven, was a nationalist interested in history.[49][50] Ultimately, Hitler never finished his primary schooling since he quit by the time he was 16, devoting his attention instead to his artistic pursuits which led him to Vienna in 1905.[51] It was in Vienna where Hitler was later to proclaim he learned some hard lessons, namely, that life was a critical struggle between the weak and the strong where principles of humanity mattered not at all, since everything simply boiled down to "victory and defeat."[52]

While Hitler was incarcerated at the Landsberg fortress busily writing Mein Kampf, he had routine visits from the respected First World War veteran, Major General Dr. Karl Haushofer, who was also the chair of the military science and geography department at the University of Munich. These meetings consisted of lectures and academic briefings on geopolitics, most certainly covering the Nazi ideal of Lebensraum and which likely influenced the views Hitler laid out in Mein Kampf.[53] Perhaps confirming Hitler's assertions, Haushofer espoused the theory that Germany was defeated in the Great War by her lack of sufficient space and autarchy.[54] Continental space and the necessity of abundant arable soil formed an important distinction between the way the British Empire extended its reach through sea-power and economics and the manner in which Hitler intended on obtaining ascendancy through territorial expansion at the expense of conquered peoples. Hitler believed it was Germany's right to seize the cultivatable land in Russia since according to him, the earth belongs to those people willing to till it "industriously" as opposed to the slothful, incompetent people unworthy to possess it. Describing the Russians in the harshest of terms while intimating that the German people were more deserving by virtue of their superior intellect, Hitler stated, "It is criminal to ask an intelligent people to limit its children in order that a lazy and stupid people next door can literally abuse a gigantic surface of the earth."[55] Presaging this Nazi goal, Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf, "Without consideration of traditions and prejudices, Germany must find the courage to gather our people and their strength for an advance along the road that will lead this people from its present restricted living space to new land and soil, and hence also free it from the danger of vanishing from the earth or of serving others as a slave nation."[56] In this sense, social Darwinism and geography were merged in Hitler's mind. Evident within the text of Mein Kampf is nothing less than the very crux of Hitler's program;[57] namely, that Germany was to become "a World Power" on the geopolitical stage or as he stated, "it will not continue to exist at all."[58]

Many historians contend that Hitler's essential character and political philosophy can be discovered in Mein Kampf. Historian James Joll for example, once claimed that Mein Kampf constituted, "all of Hitler's beliefs, most of his programme and much of his character."[59] Biographer Joachim Fest asserted that Mein Kampf contained a "remarkably faithful portrait of its author."[60] In it, he categorized human beings by their physical attributes, claiming German or Nordic Aryans were at the top of the hierarchy while assigning the bottom orders to Jews and Romani. Hitler also claimed that dominated people benefit by learning from superior Aryans, and said the Jews were conspiring to keep this "master race" from rightfully ruling the world by diluting its racial and cultural purity, and exhorting Aryans to believe in equality rather than superiority and inferiority. Within the pages of Main Kampf, Hitler describes a struggle for world domination, an ongoing racial, cultural, and political battle between Aryans and Jews, the necessary racial purification of the German people, and the need for German imperial expansion and colonisation eastwards.[61] According to Hitler and other Pan-German thinkers, Germany needed to obtain additional living space or Lebensraum, which would properly nurture the "historic destiny" of the German people; a key idea he made central in his foreign policy.[62] Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf of his hatred towards what he believed were the world's twin evils: communism and Judaism. He said his aim was to eradicate both from Germany and moreover, he stressed his intention to unite all Germans in the process of destroying them.[63]

Völkisch nationalism

Hitler was a Pan-Germanic nationalist whose ideology was built around a philosophically authoritarian, anti-Marxist, antisemitic, anti-democratic worldview. Such views of the world in the wake of the fledgling Weimar government were not uncommon in Germany since democratic/parliamentary governance seemed ineffectual to solve Germany's problems. Correspondingly, veterans of the First World War and like-minded nationalists formed the Vaterlandspartei which promoted expansionism, soldierly camaraderie and heroic leadership, all under the guise of völkisch traditions like ethnic and linguistic nationalism, but which also included obedience to authority as well as the belief in political salvation through decisive leadership.[64] The völkisch parties began to fractionalize during Hitler's absence from the revolutionary scene in Germany after the failed "Beer Hall Putsch" of November 1923. When he re-emerged upon release from Landsberg Prison, his importance to the movement was obvious and he came to believe that he was the realization of völkisch nationalistic ideals in a sort of near messianic narcissism which included his conviction to shake off the restrictive Treaty of Versailles, and to "restore Germany's might and power", creating a reborn German nation as the chosen leader of the Nazi Party.[65]

Hitler stressed the völkisch ideology, claiming Germanic/Aryan superiority in Mein Kampf with:

Every manifestation of human culture, every product of art, science and technical skill, which we see before our eyes to-day, is almost exclusively the product of the Aryan creative power. This very fact fully justifies the conclusion that it was the Aryan alone who founded a superior type of humanity; therefore he represents the archetype of what we understand by the term: MAN. He is the Prometheus of mankind, from whose shining brow the divine spark of genius has at all times flashed forth, always kindling anew that fire which, in the form of knowledge, illuminated the dark night by drawing aside the veil of mystery and thus showing man how to rise and become master over all the other beings on the earth. Should he be forced to disappear, a profound darkness will descend on the earth; within a few thousand years human culture will vanish and the world will become a desert.[66]

The völkisch nationalism of Hitler and Nazis encompassed the notion that the German Volk was epitomized by German farmers and peasants, people who remained uncorrupted by modern ideals and whose greatest attribute was their "cheerful subservience" and who, etymologically speaking, retained their capacity to respond to their "monarchical calling."[67] Hitler was their new 'monarch' in a manner of speaking. Völkisch nationalism also forged into its ideals, the importance of nature, the centrality of a knightly savior (Hitler in this case), and the belief in the superior Aryan.[68] Antisemitism remained a key component of the völkisch movement and a permanent undercurrent throughout conservative parties in German history and after many years culminated with the view that the Jews were the only thing standing in the way of the ideal society.[69] Unfortunately, Germany's newfound völkisch nationalist leader, Hitler, instantiated a policy of ethnic nationalism replete with directives to exterminate Jews and other identified enemies as National Socialism ultimately became the religion of the movement and the "irrational became concrete" under the terms of its "ideological framework."[70]

Social conservatism

Hitler and the Nazis promoted a socially conservative view of many aspects of life, supported by harsh discipline and a militaristic point of view.[71]

Evidence of Hitler's disdain for Weimar's cultural and social decadence appears on multiple occasions in Mein Kampf. In his seminal tome, he expresses an ultra-conservatism:

"If we study the course of our cultural life during the last twenty-five years we shall be astonished to note how far we have already gone in this process of retrogression. Everywhere we find the presence of those germs which give rise to protuberant growths that must sooner or later bring about the ruin of our culture. Here we find undoubted symptoms of slow corruption; and woe to the nations that are no longer able to bring that morbid process to a halt."[77]

Matters of cultured taste were also of importance, particularly in the realm of the arts. Unsurprisingly, Hitler raved against what he considered to be tasteless and morally destructive art on display throughout Germany in Mein Kampf, calling some of it morbid and declaring that "people would have benefited by not visiting them at all."[77] Convinced that it was necessary to show the German people what comprised, "degenerate art" so as to protect them in the future, Hitler arranged for a formally commissioned exhibit in July 1937 of specially selected carvings, sculptures, and paintings. Once the exhibit was at an end, selected artist's works were banned from Nazi Germany.[78]

Well known was Hitler's vehement opposition to racial-mixing but more importantly, he believed as did other Pan-Germans that Germans had an obligation to procreate:

"That such a mentality [racial purity] may be possible cannot be denied in a world where hundreds and thousands accept the principle of celibacy from their own choice, without being obliged or pledged to do so by anything except an ecclesiastical precept. Why should it not be possible to induce people to make this sacrifice if, instead of such a precept, they were simply told that they ought to put an end to this truly original sin of racial corruption which is steadily being passed on from one generation to another. And, further, they ought to be brought to realize that it is their bounden duty to give to the Almighty Creator beings such as He himself made to His own image."[79]

Another area of concern for Hitler and which was mentioned by his childhood companion in Vienna, August Kubizek, was prostitution - which Hitler associated with venereal disease and cultural decline.[80] Moreover, Hitler found the practice counter to proper family development and displayed a puritanical view in Mein Kampf, writing:

"Prostitution is a disgrace to humanity and cannot be removed simply by charitable or academic methods. Its restriction and final extermination presupposes the removal of a whole series of contributory circumstances. The first remedy must always be to establish such conditions as will make early marriages possible, especially for young men..."[81]

He goes on asserting that prostitution was dangerous and intimated much more significant, destructive socio-political implications.[82] Once Hitler came to power, his regime moved against all forms of sexual deviations and sexual crimes, especially homosexuality, a 'crime' which was prosecuted as many as 30,000 times between 1934 and 1939.[83] Hitler's social conservatism was so extreme towards homosexuals that he deemed them "enemies of the State" and grouped them in the same category as Jews and Communists; a special department of the Gestapo was formed to deal with the matter.[84]

Hitler's general perception about women was ultra-conservative and patriarchal, with their foremost task being a domestic one as a mother of children who worked contentedly at home, ensuring it remained clean and orderly; meanwhile, it was the woman's role to educate her children to be conscious of their importance as Aryans and instill within them a commitment to their ethnic community. Consequently, Hitler believed women had no place in public or political life due to their differing nature from men.[85][86] Like many Romantic artists, musicians, and writers, the Nazis valued strength, passion, frank declarations of feelings, and deep devotion to family and community (with women being seen as the center of the family in Nazi Germany).[87]

So great was Hitler's influence in all political aspects of social life, that even education for children was subordinate to his opinion. Along these lines, Hitler was profoundly anti-intellectual and against conventional education; instead he determined that training and education should be designed to create young German 'national comrades' who were utterly convinced of their "superiority to others."[88] Moreover, Hitler wanted to create young German soldiers who were willing to fight for their convictions, so they were accordingly indoctrinated by Nazi propaganda, trained in military discipline, and taught obedience to authority in the Hitler Youth.[89] Ultimate obedience was then transferred directly to their Führer and his political cause.

Contempt for democracy

Hitler blamed Germany's parliamentary government for many of the nation's ills. The Nazis and Hitler especially, associated democracy with the failed Weimar government and the punitive Treaty of Versailles.[90] Hitler often denounced democracy, equating it with internationalism. Since democratic ideals espoused equality for all men, it represented to Hitler and his Nazi ideologues the notion of mob rule and the hatred of excellence.[91] Not only was democracy antithetical to their social-Darwinist abstractions, but its international-capitalist framework was considered an exclusively Jewish-derived conception.[92] Hitler also thought democracy was nothing more than a preliminary stage of Bolshevism.[93]

Hitler believed in the leader principle (hence his title, the Leader, der Führer), and he considered it ludicrous that an idea of governance or morality could be held by the people above the power of the leader. As Joachim Fest described a 1930 confrontation between Hitler and Otto Strasser, "Now Hitler took Strasser to task for placing 'the idea' above the Führer and wanting 'to give every party comrade the right to decide the nature of the idea, even to decide whether or not the Führer is true to the so-called idea.' That, he cried angrily, was the worst kind of democracy, for which there was no place in their movement. 'With us the Führer and the idea are one and the same, and every party comrade has to do what the Führer commands, for he embodies the idea and he alone knows its ultimate goal.'"[94] [95]

Although Hitler realized that his ascension to power required the use of the Weimar Republic’s parliamentary system (founded on democratic principles), he never intended for the continuation of democratic governance once in control. Contrarily, Hitler proclaimed that he would "destroy democracy with the weapons of democracy."[96] The rapid transition made by the Nazis once they assumed control clearly reveals that Hitler succeeded in this regard. For the most part, democratic governance was never embraced by the German masses or by the elite.[97] The ill-fated Weimar democracy’s inability to provide economic relief to the German people during the Great Depression further enhanced its image as an ineffectual system of government amid the masses.[97] Hitler offered people the prospect of a "new and better society".[98] He exploited the conditions in Germany in the ultimate expression of political opportunism when he brought his dictatorial and totalitarian government to power; thereafter, attempting to impose himself and his system upon the world in the process.[97]


In Hitler's mind, communism was the primary enemy of Germany, an enemy he often mentions in Mein Kampf. During the trial for his involvement in the Beer-Hall Putsch, Hitler claimed that his singular goal was to assist the German government in "fighting Marxism".[99] Marxism, Bolshevism, and Communism were interchangeable terms for Hitler as evidenced by their use in Mein Kampf:

"In the years 1913 and 1914 I expressed my opinion for the first time in various circles, some of which are now members of the National Socialist Movement, that the problem of how the future of the German nation can be secured is the problem of how Marxism can be exterminated."[100]

Later in his seminal tome, Hitler advocated for "the destruction of Marxism in all its shapes and forms."[101] According to Hitler, Marxism was a Jewish strategy to subjugate Germany and the world. Marxism was a mental and political form of slavery.[102] From Hitler's vantage point, Bolsheviks existed to serve "Jewish international finance."[103] When the British tried negotiating with Hitler in 1935 by including Germany in the extension of the Locarno Pact, he rejected their offer and instead, assured them that German rearmament was important in safeguarding Europe against Communism,[104] a move which clearly showed his anti-Communist proclivities.[105] In 1939, Hitler told the Swiss Commissioner to the League of Nations, Carl Burckhardt, that everything he was undertaking was "directed against Russia" and continued with, "if those in the West are too stupid or too blind to understand this, then I shall be forced to come to an understanding with the Russians to beat the West, and then, after its defeat, turn with all my concerted force against the Soviet Union."[106] When Hitler finally ordered the attack against the Soviet Union, it was the fulfillment of his ultimate goal and the most important campaign in his estimation, as it comprised a struggle of "the chosen Aryan people against Jewish Bolsheviks."[107]

Biographer Alan Bullock avows, Hitler "laid great stress" on the need to concentrate on a single enemy, an enemy he lumps together as "Marxism and the Jew."[108] Shortly in the wake of the Commissar Order, a directive pursuant the German invasion of the Soviet Union, SS Deputy Reinhard Heydrich informed his SS henchmen of Hitler’s geopolitical philosophy which forged Bolshevism and Jews into the same mass with, "eastern Jewry is the intellectual reservoir of Bolshevism and in the Führer’s view must therefore be annihilated."[109] Considering the eventual Nazi invasion of the Soviet Union (Operation Barbarossa), no additional inducements are really requisite concerning Hitler's hatred of Communism, particularly since the Nazi persecution and extermination of these groups was not only systematic, but it was extensive both within Germany and only intensified in the occupied zones during the war under Hitler's leadership.[110]

Because Nazism co-opted the popular success of communism among working people while simultaneously promising to destroy communism and offer an alternative to it, Hitler's anticommunist program allowed industrialists with traditional conservative views (tending toward monarchism, aristocracy, and laissez-faire capitalism) to cast their lot with, and help underwrite, the Nazi rise to power.[111][112]

Invasion of the Soviet Union

Historian Roderick Stackelberg contends that Hitler’s invasion of the Soviet Union (Operation Barbarossa) was the result of "mutually reinforcing ideological, racial, and geopolitical assumptions" that Hitler had plainly laid out in Mein Kampf.[113] Noted German historian Andreas Hillgruber shares this view. In fact, Hillgruber encapsulates Hitler’s political views (which drove German policy throughout his rule) in summary through the invasion of the Soviet Union. He places it within the context of Hitler's intent to create a continental Reich, which included the destruction of the Jews. According to Hillgruber, Hitler had the following objectives in mind when he invaded the former Soviet Union:

1. The total eradication of all forms of "Judeo-Bolshevik" leadership, which encompassed its perceived biological roots, namely the millions of Jews occupying central and eastern Europe;
2. The requisite acquisition of Lebensraum or colonial space necessary for German settlement in the finest and most arable territories within Russia, or in those parts of Russia which provided political or strategic advantages in Hitler’s mind;
3. The subjugation and decimation of the Slavic people, which was to be divided into four German territories or "Reich Commissariats" entitled Ostland, Ukraine, Moskovia and Caucasus; each subordinated to German "viceroys" and ruled much the same way the British ruled their colonial dominion India. One of the principal aims of German leadership in these Reich Commissariats would be the cancellation of any semblance or memory of Russian statehood and the conditioning of these subordinated "states" to German mastery;
4. Ultimately, a "great space" autarchy in continental Europe under German suzerainty would result, one capable of defeating any possible Allied blockade and for whom, the vanquished eastern territories could provide a theoretically inexhaustible source raw materials and food necessary for any protracted war against the Anglo-Saxon powers. The establishment of this "German Reich of the Germanic nation" also included in its planning - to feed its soldiers off the Russian land, even though that meant that "many millions of people will be starved to death"; a directive already contemplated by the Economic Staff East no later than 02 May 1941.[114]

Not alone in this interpretation of Hitler’s invasion of the Soviet Union as a move of continental expansion and one with an anti-Semitic eliminationist political intent, Hillgruber is joined by the likes of historian Karl Dietrich Bracher among others.[115] In his pioneering work, The German Dictatorship, Bracher called the invasion the consequence of Hitler’s "ideological obsession" and stated that "Hitler’s drive for territorial expansion and the relentless expansion of the SS state ushered in the final phase of National Socialist rule."[116] That final phase proved disastrous for the Jews, Slavs, Roma-Sinti, Russians, and countless others – atop the reality that it also brought untold suffering to Hitler's beloved German Volksgenossen as the British and American bomber forces unleashed their wrath turning the Reich to rubble; meanwhile the Red Army laid waste to the German army and once-occupied German land as they counter-attacked.

Anti-Semitism and the Holocaust

Among scholars of the Nazi era, Hitler’s role and relationship to the regime and the Holocaust has been a source of consternation and acrimonious historiographical debate. Biographer Ian Kershaw wrote that for historians, Hitler was "unreachable" and that he was "cocooned in the silence of the sources."[117] What Kershaw was referencing was the absence of any clear political directives accompanied by Hitler’s signed authorization (primary source documents) regarding the atrocities carried out by his Nazi underlings. Given the abounding circumstantial evidence in Hitler’s speeches, writing in Mein Kampf, administrative meeting notes taken by subordinates, and the recollections of those in or near his inner-circle, it seems that his political intention was for Jews, Slavs, and other "enemies" of the Nazi state to be persecuted without mercy – in lieu of how gradual the process actually developed. Two primary schools of thought emerged about Hitler’s political role in Nazi policy and the Holocaust. One is termed intentionalist, represented by scholars who contend that virtually all Nazi policies (including the extermination of the Jews) were resultant from Hitler’s desires; whereas the other school, entitled functionalist/structuralist, consists of scholars who see the intensification of Nazi persecution policies due to power struggles within the Nazi government as his minions attempted to "interpret" their master’s wishes, often acting autonomously.[118]

Either way, anti-Semitism always constituted one of the most important aspects of Hitler’s political views. Historian Peter Longerich writes that "There can be no doubt that Hitler's behaviour during his entire political career... was characterised by radical antisemitism."[119] Correspondingly, Germanic cultural and racial purity remained paramount in his understanding of the world, having once exclaimed, "The greatest danger is and remains for us, the alien racial poison in our body. All other dangers are transitory."[120] Throughout Mein Kampf, Hitler employs biological crudity by describing the Jews as "parasites" or "vermin."[121] Reflecting back on the beginning of the First World War, Hitler makes the eerily prescient statement, that had these "Hebrew corrupters" been "held under poison gas" that it may have otherwise saved millions of German lives.[122] Underlining the argument that Hitler had overt eliminationist intentions for the Jews is the oft quoted:

should the international Jewry of finance (Finanzjudentum) succeed, both within and beyond Europe, in plunging mankind into yet another world war, then the result will not be Bolshevization of the earth and the victory of Jewry, but the annihilation (Vernichtung) of the Jewish race in Europe.[123]

German historian Klaus Hildebrand insisted that Hitler’s moral responsibility for the Holocaust was the culmination of his pathological hatred of the Jews and his ideology of "racial dogma" which formed the basis of Nazi genocide.[124] Historian David Welch asserts that even if Hitler never gave the direct order for the implementation of the Final Solution, this is nothing more than a "red herring" as it fails to recognize his "leadership style" where Hitler's simple verbal statements were sufficient to launch initiatives "from below". Those "working towards the Führer" would often implement "his totalitarian vision without written authority."[125] Taking the scale of the logistical operations that the Holocaust comprised in the middle of a war into consideration alone, it is highly unlikely, if not impossible, that the extermination of so many people and the coordination of such an extensive effort could have occurred in the absence of Hitler’s authorization.[126] As Welch relates, if Heinrich Himmler was the "architect of genocide", he was merely "an instrument of Hitler’s will."[127] In the final analysis, Hitler was essentially omnipotent as the Führer of Nazi Germany with all encompassing power as the "supreme legislator, supreme administrator, and supreme judge" along with being the "leader of the Party, the Army, and the people."[128] Every major political decision and move in Nazi Germany was made at his discretion - to include the wholesale extermination of millions of people.

See also


  1. Hitler believed the Jewish people were “the plague of the world.” See: Georg Lukács, Die Zerstörung der Vernunft, p. 565.
  2. An important book as to Hitler’s outlook on the world, which includes insight into his political philosophy, is Eberhard Jäckel’s work, Hitler’s Worldview: A Blueprint for Power. Jäckel details to the extent possible, the sophisticated and contradictory nature of Hitler’s views which he fashioned according to need on his path to power. According to Jäckel, the one thing that remained consistent throughout Hitler’s life was his single-mindedness, even if it was derived from a lengthy synthesis which he “haphazardly” brought together, there can be no denying that Hitler possessed an “unusual programmatic mind” which was also “an unusual political force”. See: Jäckel (1981). Hitler’s Worldview: A Blueprint for Power, pp. 120, 108-121.
  3. Meinecke (1950). The German Catastrophe, p. 96.
  4. 4.0 4.1 Kershaw 2008, pp. 170, 172, 181.
  5. Nicholls (2000). Adolf Hitler: A Biographical Companion, pp. 153-154.
  6. Stern (1992). Hitler: The Führer and the People, pp. 45-53.
  7. Kershaw 2008, pp. 72–74.
  8. Rees (2012). Hitler’s Charisma: Leading Millions into the Abyss, pp. 17-18.
  9. Kershaw 2008, pp. 61, 62.
  10. Kershaw 2008, pp. 61–63.
  11. Jäckel (1981). Hitler’s Worldview: A Blueprint for Power, pp. 51-57.
  12. More than that, Hitler thought the Jews were a problem for the entire world and their elimination essential to survival. See Jäckel (1981). Hitler's World View: A Blueprint for Power, pp.47-66.
  13. 13.0 13.1 Kershaw 2008, p. 82.
  14. While spying on the German Worker's Party, Hitler became impressed by the group's general ideology and instead, joined the organization since "it was so much to his liking", eventually becoming the party's leader. See: Heiden (2002). The Führer, p. 77.
  15. Ernst Deuerlein, "Hitlers Eintritt in die Politik und die Reichswehr," Vierteljahrshefte für Zeitgeschichte 7. Jahrg., 2. H. (Apr., 1959): 207. Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag GmbH (and its subsidiary Akademie Verlag GmbH). Cited from JSTOR (accessed June 06, 2015), Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/30197163
  16. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  17. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  18. For more on European conceptions about the Jews, see the two chapters, "The Jews: Myth and Counter-Myth", and "Infected Christianity" in Toward the Final Solution: A History of European Racism by George Mosse (1980)., pp. 113-149.
  19. Stackelberg 2007, p. 9.
  20. Mitcham 1996, p. 67.
  21. Kershaw 2008, p. 93.
  22. Heiden (2002). The Führer, p. 80.
  23. Toland, Adolf Hitler, chapter 4.
  24. 24.0 24.1 Kershaw 2008, pp. 89–92.
  25. Bullock 1999, p. 376.
  26. Kershaw 2008, pp. 105–106.
  27. Bullock 1999, p. 377.
  28. Kershaw 2008, pp. 100, 101.
  29. Kershaw 2008, p. 102.
  30. Kershaw 2008, p. 103.
  31. Toland, Adolf Hitler, pp. 111-112.
  32. Kershaw 2008, p. 112.
  33. Ludendorff during the early 1920s was the leading figure of the Fatherland Fighting Leagues and the various Freikorps and only became a member of the party thereafter.
  34. Kershaw 2008, pp. 126, 129, 130-131.
  35. Kershaw 2008, p. 129.
  36. Kershaw 2008, pp. 130–131.
  37. Shirer 1960, pp. 73–74.
  38. Kershaw 2008, p. 132.
  39. 39.0 39.1 Kershaw 2008, p. 131.
  40. In any case, Rosenberg was so disliked that he would be an unlikely threat to take over Hitler's leadership.
  41. Spotts (2009). Hitler and the Power of Aesthetics, p. 43.
  42. Spotts (2009). Hitler and the Power of Aesthetics, pp. 43-44.
  43. Bullock 1962, p. 121.
  44. McNab 2011, p. 16.
  45. Kershaw 2008, pp. 148–149.
  46. Shirer 1960, pp. 80–81.
  47. McNab 2011, p. 15.
  48. Kershaw 2008, pp. 148–150.
  49. Hitler (1943) Mein Kampf, pp. 8-10.
  50. Historian Sebastian Haffner claims that at the basest or lowest of levels, Hitler's philosophical "bedrock" was a fusion of "nationalism and anti-Semitism." See: Haffner (2004)[1978]. The Meaning of Hitler, pp. 8-9.
  51. Fest (2002). Hitler, pp. 18-23.
  52. Lukacs (1997). The Hitler of History, p. 71.
  53. Kaplan (2012). The Revenge of Geography, pp. 82-83.
  54. Toland (1976). Adolf Hitler, p. 124.
  55. Heiden (2002). The Führer, p. 255.
  56. Hitler (1971). Mein Kampf, p. 646.
  57. Hillgruber (1981). Germany and the Two World Wars, p. 50.
  58. Hitler (1939). Mein Kampf, p. 500.
  59. Joll (1978). Europe since 1870, p. 332.
  60. Fest (2002). Hitler, p. 203.
  61. Williamson (2002). The Third Reich, p. 15.
  62. McDonough (1999). Hitler and Nazi Germany, p. 15.
  63. McDonough (1999). Hitler and Nazi Germany, pp. 14-15.
  64. Kershaw (1989). The “Hitler Myth”: Image and Reality in the Third Reich, pp. 18-21.
  65. Kershaw (2000). Hitler: 1889-1936, Hubris, pp. 223-225.
  66. Hitler (1939). Mein Kampf, p. 226.
  67. Stern (1974). The Politics of Cultural Despair: A Study in the Rise of the Germanic Ideology, pp. 147-149.
  68. Mosse (1964). The Crisis of German Ideology: Intellectual Origins of the Third Reich, pp. 204-207.
  69. Mosse (1964). The Crisis of German Ideology: Intellectual Origins of the Third Reich, p. 243.
  70. Mosse (1964). The Crisis of German Ideology: Intellectual Origins of the Third Reich, pp. 312-317.
  71. Bessel (2006). Nazism and War, pp. 35-38, 41-43, 50-56.
  72. Koonz (2005). The Nazi Conscience, pp. 10, 106.
  73. Grunberger (1971). The 12-Year Reich: A Social History of Nazi Germany, 1933-1945, pp. 423-426.
  74. Grunberger (1971). The 12-Year Reich: A Social History of Nazi Germany, 1933-1945, pp. 15, 30, 208, 234, 239, 245-249, 262-264, 273.
  75. Evans 2005, p. 299.
  76. Mosse (1964). The Crisis of German Ideology: Intellectual Origins of the Third Reich, pp. 67-87.
  77. 77.0 77.1 Hitler (1939). Mein Kampf, p. 204.
  78. Evans (2005). The Third Reich in Power, pp. 171-177.
  79. Hitler (1939). Mein Kampf, p. 316.
  80. Kershaw (2000). Hitler: 1889-1936, Hubris, p. 45.
  81. Hitler (1939). Mein Kampf, p. 198.
  82. Hitler (1939). Mein Kampf, p. 201.
  83. Wolfgang Harthauser, Die Verfolgung der Homosexualen im Dritten Reich, cited in Grunberger (1971). The Twelve-Year Reich: A Social History of Nazi Germany, p. 121.
  84. Bracher (1970). The German Dictatorship: The Origins, Structure, and Effects of National Socialism, p. 353.
  85. Stephenson (2001). Women in Nazi Germany, pp. 16-18.
  86. Evans 2005, pp. 331-332.
  87. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  88. Pine (2010). Education in Nazi Germany, p. 13.
  89. Kater (2004) Hitler Youth, p. 69.
  90. Stern (1992). Hitler: The Führer and the People, p. 14.
  91. Stern (1992). Hitler: The Führer and the People, p. 88.
  92. Gellately (2007). Lenin, Stalin, and Hitler: The Age of Social Catastrophe, p. 13.
  93. Hillgruber (1981). Germany and the Two World Wars, p. 51.
  94. Fest (2002). Hitler, p. 279.
  95. Democracy or more specifically “Germanic democracy”, according to Hitler’s deputy Rudolf Hess, consisted of “unconditional authority downwards, and responsibility upwards.” Kershaw (2000). Hitler: 1889-1936, Hubris, p. 294. This hierarchical image of democracy was anything but democratic in nomenclature and was most likely an ironic remark.
  96. Grunfeld (1974). The Hitler File: A Social History of Germany and the Nazis, 1918-45, p. 109.
  97. 97.0 97.1 97.2 Kershaw 2008, p. 258.
  98. Kershaw 2008, pp. 258, 259.
  99. Bullock (1962). Hitler: A Study in Tyranny, p. 128.
  100. Hitler (1941). Mein Kampf, p. 203.
  101. Hitler (1939). Mein Kampf, p. 419.
  102. McNab 2011, p. 17.
  103. Hitler (1939). Mein Kampf, p. 475.
  104. Bullock (1962). Hitler: A Study in Tyranny, p. 334.
  105. Later when the Nazi-Soviet agreement was made, otherwise known as the Molotov-Robbentrop Pact, the British were stunned. This surprising (and temporary) treaty was signed by the Nazis for the sake of geopolitical convenience. Germany's invasion of the Soviet Union dissolved its contents.
  106. Hildebrand (1973). The Foreign Policy of the Third Reich, p. 88.
  107. Victor (2007). Hitler: The Pathology of Evil. , p. 198.
  108. Bullock (1962). Hitler: A Study in Tyranny, p. 130.
  109. [DNA Nuremberg NO-4145/2 (deposition of Walter Blume 29 VI 47)]. Cited from: Binion (1991). Hitler among the Germans, p. 61.
  110. Hildebrand (1984). The Third Reich, pp. 61-62, 70-71.
  111. Turner (1985). German Big Business and the Rise of Hitler, pp. 340-359.
  112. In the 1920s and 30s, there was a fear among German industrialists, not wholly unfounded, that Germany would likely suffer an October-style Bolshevik revolution at some point, and become a Soviet republic of the 'World Soviet Federation' envisioned by international communists, unless drastic anticommunist measures were taken. For example, Fritz Thyssen, who had been arrested by German "Reds" in 1918, did not trust that the Weimar Republic would indefinitely succeed in fending off a Bolshevist-type revolution.
  113. Stackelberg (1999). Hitler's Germany: Origins, Interpretations, Legacies, p. 188.
  114. Andreas Hillgruber, "Die “Endlösung“ und das deutsche Ostimperium als Kernstück des rassenideologischen Programms des Nationalsozialismus," Vierteljahrshefte für Zeitgeschichte 20. Jahrg., 2. H. (Apr., 1972): 140. Cited from JSTOR, (accessed June 4, 2015). Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/30197201
  115. Stackelberg claims Hitler’s "attack on the Soviet Union was the fulfillment of the mission of his life." See: Stackelberg (1999). Hitler's Germany: Origins, Interpretations, Legacies, p. 189.
  116. Bracher (1970). The German Dictatorship: The Origins, Structure, and Effects of National Socialism, p. 403.
  117. Kershaw (1993). The Nazi Dictatorship: Problems and Perspectives of Interpretation, p. 4.
  118. For a better understanding of this debate, see:Functionalism versus intentionalism. According to historian Richard Bessel, most academics studying Hitler and the Nazi regime have embraced and synthesized these once divergent schools of thought and now see the merit in both. Richard Bessel, "Functionalists vs. Intentionalists: The Debate Twenty Years on or Whatever Happened to Functionalism and Intentionalism?" German Studies Review 26, no. 1 (2003): p. 16.
  119. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  120. Klöss, ed. (1967). Reden des Führers. Politik and Propaganda Adolf Hitlers, 1922-1945, p. 49.
  121. Hitler (1969). Mein Kampf, p. 155.
  122. Hitler (1969). Mein Kampf, p. 620.
  123. Domarus (1990). Hitler Speeches and Proclamations, 1932–1945. [Vols. 1-4], p. 1449.
  124. Hildebrand (1984). The Third Reich, p. 149.
  125. Welch (2001). Hitler: Profile of a Dictator, pp. 88-89.
  126. Welch (2001). Hitler: Profile of a Dictator, pp. 89-90.
  127. Welch (2001). Hitler: Profile of a Dictator, p. 90.
  128. Neumann (1967). Behemoth: The Structure and Practice of National Socialism, p. 74.


  • Bessel, Richard. Nazism and War. New York: Modern Library, 2006. ISBN 978-0-81297-557-4
  • Binion, Rudolph. Hitler among the Germans. Dekalb, IL: Northern Illinois University Press, 1991. ISBN 978-0-87580-531-3
  • Bracher, Karl D. The German Dictatorship: The Origins, Structure, and Effects of National Socialism. New York: Praeger Publishers, 1970. ISBN 978-0-27583-780-8
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Deuerlein, Ernst. "Hitlers Eintritt in die Politik und die Reichswehr." Vierteljahrshefte für Zeitgeschichte 7. Jahrg., 2. H. (Apr., 1959): 177-227. Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag GmbH (and its subsidiary Akademie Verlag GmbH). Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/30197163
  • Domarus, Max. Hitler Speeches and Proclamations, 1932–1945. Vols. 1-4. Wauconda: Bolchazy-Carducci, 1990. ISBN 0-86516-228X
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Fest, Joachim C. Hitler. Orlando, FL.: Harcourt, 2002 [1973]. ISBN 978-0-15602-754-0
  • Gellately, Robert. Lenin, Stalin, and Hitler: The Age of Social Catastrophe. New York: Vintage Books, 2007. ISBN 978-1-40003-213-6
  • Grunberger, Richard. The 12-Year Reich: A Social History of Nazi Germany, 1933-1945. New York: Henry Holt & Co., 1971. ASIN: B00C4Y7ROM
  • Grunfeld, Frederic. The Hitler File: A Social History of Germany and the Nazis, 1918-45. New York: Random House, 1974. ISBN 978-0-29776-799-2
  • Haffner, Sebastian, The Meaning of Hitler. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2004 [1978]. ISBN 978-0-67455-775-8
  • Heiden, Konrad. The Führer. Edison, NJ: Castle Books, 2002 [1944]. ISBN 0-7858-1551-1
  • Hildebrand, Klaus. The Foreign Policy of the Third Reich. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1973. ISBN 978-0-52002-528-8
  • Hildebrand, Klaus. The Third Reich. London & New York: Routledge, 1984. ISBN 0-04943033-5
  • Hillgruber, Andreas. "Die “Endlösung“ und das deutsche Ostimperium als Kernstück des rassenideologischen Programms des Nationalsozialismus." Vierteljahrshefte für Zeitgeschichte 20. Jahrg., 2. H. (Apr., 1972): 133-153. Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag GmbH (and its subsidiary Akademie Verlag GmbH). Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/30197201.
  • Hillgruber, Andreas. Germany and the Two World Wars. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1981. ISBN 0-674-35321-8
  • Hitler, Adolf, Mein Kampf. Boston: Ralph Manheim, 1943 [1925]. Also cited are the following versions: Hitler, Adolf. Mein Kampf. London: Hurst and Blackett Ltd., 1939./ Hitler, Adolf. Mein Kampf. New York: Reynal & Hitchkock, 1941./ Hilter, Adolf. Mein Kampf. London: Hutchinson, 1969./ Hitler, Adolf. Mein Kampf. New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1971.
  • Jäckel, Eberhard. Hitler’s Worldview: A Blueprint for Power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981 [1969]. ISBN 0-674-40425-4
  • Joll, James. Europe since 1870. New York: Penguin, 1978. ISBN 978-0-14021-918-0
  • Kaplan, Robert D. The Revenge of Geography. New York: Random House, 2012. ISBN 978-1-40006-983-5
  • Kater, Michael. Hitler Youth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004. ISBN 978-0-67401-496-1
  • Kershaw, Ian. The “Hitler Myth”: Image and Reality in the Third Reich. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989. ISBN 978-0-19282-234-5
  • Kershaw, Ian. The Nazi Dictatorship: Problems and Perspectives of Interpretation. London and New York: Routledge, 1993 [1985]. ISBN 978-0-34055-047-2
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Kershaw, Ian. Hitler: 1889-1936, Hubris. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2000. ISBN 978-0-39332-035-0
  • Klöss, Erhard, ed. Reden des Führers. Politik and Propaganda Adolf Hitlers, 1922-1945. Munich: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag, 1967. ASIN: B0035ZBVNM
  • Koonz, Claudia. The Nazi Conscience. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2005. ISBN 978-0-67401-842-6
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lukács, Georg. Die Zerstörung der Vernunft. Berlin: Aufbau-Verlag, 1954. ASIN: B000YE60WY
  • Lukacs, John. The Hitler of History. New York: Random House, 1997. ISBN 978-0-37570-113-9
  • McDonough, Frank. Hitler and Nazi Germany. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999. ISBN 978-0-52159-502-5
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Meinecke, Friedrich, trans. by Sidney Fay. The German Catastrophe. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1950. ASIN: B000NWQLLM
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Mosse, George L. The Crisis of German Ideology: Intellectual Origins of the Third Reich. New York: Grosset & Dunlap, 1964. ASIN: B000OKVU6E
  • Mosse, George L. Toward the Final Solution: A History of European Racism. New York: Harper & Row, 1980. ISBN 0-06-090756-8
  • Neumann, Franz. Behemoth: Structure and Practice of National Socialism. London: Frank Cass Publishers, 1967 [1942]. ISBN 978-0-06131-289-2
  • Nicholls, David. Adolf Hitler: A Biographical Companion. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO, 2000. ISBN 978-0-87436-965-6
  • Pine, Lisa. Education in Nazi Germany. New York: Berg Publishers, 2010. ISBN 978-1-84520-265-1
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Rees, Laurence. Hitler’s Charisma: Leading Millions into the Abyss. New York: Vintage Books, 2012. ISBN 978-0-30738-958-9
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Spotts, Frederic. Hitler and the Power of Aesthetics. New York: Overlook Press, 2009. ISBN 978-1-59020-178-7
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Stackelberg, Roderick. Hitler's Germany: Origins, Interpretations, Legacies. London: Routledge, 1999. ISBN 0-415-20114-4
  • Stern, Fritz. The Politics of Cultural Despair: A Study in the Rise of the Germanic Ideology. Berkeley and London: University of California Press, 1974. ISBN 0-520-02626-8
  • Stern, J. P. Hitler: The Führer and the People. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1992 [1975]. ISBN 978-0-52002-952-1
  • Stephenson, Jill. Women in Nazi Germany. London and New York: Longman, 2001. ISBN 978-0-58241-836-3
  • The History Place: The Rise of Adolf Hitler
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Turner, Henry Ashby. German Big Business and the Rise of Hitler. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1985. ISBN 978-0-19503-492-9
  • Victor, George. Hitler: The Pathology of Evil. Washington D.C.: Potomac Books, 2007. ISBN 978-1-57488-228-5
  • Welch, David. Hitler: Profile of a Dictator. New York: Routledge, 2001. ISBN 978-0-41525-075-7
  • Williamson, David G. The Third Reich. 3rd edition. London: Longman Publishers, 2002. ISBN 978-0-58236-883-5

Script error: The function "top" does not exist.

Script error: The function "bottom" does not exist.