Powers & Principalities, Episode 032, YouTube Auto-Generated Transcription
Contents
Powers & Principalities, Episode 032
Description
The 1970's.
About
The transcription text below is a YouTube auto-generated English transcription from Powers & Principalities, Episode 032, published by "thkelly67" on 2017-12-28 with a running time of 1:21:34. All episodes of the Powers & Principalities weekly audio interview series between Joseph Atwill and Tim Kelly are included in this playlist on YouTube and are also available as audio podcast downloads on Tim Kelly's "Our Interesting Times" channel on Podomatic.
All transcription copyrights belong to Tim Kelly (thkelly67) & Joseph Atwill.
Donate
Donate on PayPal or on Patreon to Tim Kelly's "Our Interesting Times" and "Powers & Principalities" audio shows.
YouTube auto-generated English transcription
00:00 [Music] 00:27 the 00:28 [Music] 00:38 [Music] 00:41 so how you doing 00:43 just another perfect night Tim and 00:46 there's no fires anywhere in sight Oh 00:48 excellent that's the way yeah here it's 00:50 very cold very seasonal I don't mind it 00:52 it's winter and I'm becoming the mood 00:53 for it of course we're in the final days 00:58 of 2017 and we're gonna go back in time 01:02 so okay so at least at least 38 years 01:05 but really 4045 years into the 1970s 01:10 we'll talk about the 1970s sort of as a 01:13 hangover from the 1960's feminism came 01:17 of age 01:18 disco music stagflation the rise of the 01:22 neocons pet rocks lava lamps and leisure 01:25 suits so the nineteen seventies Joe that 01:28 was that was theirs the scent ninety 01:30 cents were your salad days I presume 01:32 right there that was your your time 01:35 right I'm still waiting for my salad 01:37 okay I was alive I did as everyone did 01:44 you know get swept up in some of it you 01:48 know things that I would be embarrassed 01:50 about today but it was just in a really 01:55 kind of an important time to study 01:57 because you know I think it's well 02:00 established that we had a a organization 02:05 and an operation that diverted American 02:10 particularly white European American 02:12 culture in the 60s okay it did you can 02:16 trace it way way back but you can 02:18 certainly start this with in 1957 may 02:21 you know Gordon Lawson and then in the 02:23 60s you had all of the government 02:25 operatives in motion to create you know 02:28 the counterculture ends up with you know 02:31 Woodstock and Altamont 02:33 you know kids fornicating in the mud 02:36 there's just tremendous amount of drug 02:37 use and they have an archaic revival 02:41 appearance to the young people you know 02:44 they have kind of quasi American Indian 02:47 and 02:48 Pirates of the Caribbean look you know 02:50 and also just the hobo I mean these 02:52 things are all kind of blended together 02:53 into the hippie but this all comes to an 02:59 end you know you you have Woodstock and 03:02 then Altamont and so now you have the 03:05 70s and amazingly you have you know a 03:10 new phenomena that kind of grows to some 03:14 extent out of the out of the 03:17 counterculture and it's the disco 03:18 movement and it's really hard to even 03:22 you know characterize how how widespread 03:27 this phenomena was in the 70s if you 03:29 didn't live through it but it was very 03:31 widely promoted i I mean I would say 03:33 that the disco as far as a media 03:36 phenomena was more promoted than the 03:39 hippie was now so I think it should be 03:44 studied in that regard and we'll do that 03:45 tonight 03:46 but the 70s were also an enormous sea 03:50 change in terms of the middle class this 03:54 is when all the demographics go south 03:56 everything goes wrong for the middle 03:58 class starting to start slowly but it 04:00 all starts in the 70s you start having 04:03 increase in single moms you start having 04:06 less family production the the wage 04:11 earner is starting to get pinched right 04:14 this is where you start seeing a 04:16 two-parent income rather than 04:19 stay-at-home mom and so for some reason 04:24 America started to change dramatically 04:26 at this point and you also started to 04:29 see the advent of pornography right you 04:31 started to see Playboy magazine hustler 04:35 magazine penthouse magazines they were 04:37 almost everywhere you know they started 04:38 becoming ubiquitous it started to 04:41 normalize it and so the culture shifted 04:45 in a bad direction and so to help like 04:48 with the schematic you know of how we 04:50 got from the MKULTRA 04:54 production of the counterculture to 04:56 where we are today with feed to based 04:59 integrated 05:02 you know non-family producing 05:04 pornographic culture you got to 05:07 understand how the transition occurred 05:09 and and it's also it's important to try 05:12 to see if it you can show if it was 05:13 deliberate you know this would be very 05:15 useful in terms of what you and I have 05:17 described as the building out of the 05:18 schematic so Tim like what events in the 05:22 70s you know stood out to you as as 05:25 things that you know people should be 05:28 aware of well looking back I think one 05:31 of the major events you mentioned the 05:33 the pinching of the middle class the 05:36 climbing of the the family the advent of 05:40 the to income family the working mother 05:43 and Kristin it going into the 1970s 05:46 there's still a large gap between male 05:49 and female income I think it was a 40 05:52 cents on the dollar as the decade opened 05:54 and contrary to popular belief I don't 05:58 believe the narrowing of the gap is a 06:00 sign of progress because that's all with 06:02 the the rise women's income to now at 06:05 the close to 80% of male income on 06:07 average is actually a negative index of 06:12 measurement rather it's some because it 06:14 shows that women have been forced into 06:17 wage slavery and they call it freedom 06:19 and this has also had a deplorable 06:21 effect on the quality of family life and 06:23 that much less resources are devoted 06:25 into the nurturing and raising of 06:27 children and the providing of a sort of 06:29 a decent domestic you know abode for the 06:34 family possibly for the male so it's had 06:36 a deplorable effect disguised as 06:38 progress that boys the oligarchs have 06:41 done a wonderful job of disguising 06:42 slavery's freedom and that's how it get 06:45 the people to accept it and it goes back 06:47 to the policies that were decisions that 06:50 were taken and not just because the 06:52 politicians were foolish or 06:53 short-sighted that's the excuse you know 06:56 in nineteen as you answer 1970 the US 07:00 economy was in recession Nixon it was 07:04 understood Nixon kind of panicked and 07:06 that's when he closed the gold window 07:08 because for the first time the US 07:11 economy went into a trade deficit 07:14 and when they closed the gold window 07:16 that cut the dollars last tie to two 07:19 gold and the discipline associated with 07:22 the Bretton Woods system that was a 07:25 consequence of the guns and butter 07:27 policy in the 1960s sort of a spend 07:29 spend spend and the the promises of 07:34 Bretton Woods system the US dollar could 07:36 never could no longer be redeemed in 07:37 gold and there's certainly too many 07:39 dollars out there floating around so you 07:41 just simply save closed the gold window 07:42 shut the Bretton Woods system down the 07:44 brother was supposed to be a temporary 07:45 measure 07:46 here we are 47 47 years later he imposed 07:52 a bunch of wage and price controls was 07:54 just nonsense cause a lot of havoc 07:55 course in 1973 you had the Yom Kippur 07:58 War which some people believe I think 08:01 there's a lot of evidence to the effect 08:02 that it was sort of fomented by 08:03 Kissinger as a pretext for bringing 08:07 creating the petrodollar and that was to 08:11 cause an oil shock the cause of Christ 08:12 for all the increased 400% at the same 08:16 time they're working out the deal with 08:17 the Saudis to sell their oil only in US 08:20 dollars this creates huge demand for US 08:22 dollars 08:22 okay it's a vast pool of pool of credit 08:24 for the federal government Treasuries a 08:26 lot of that money gets siphoned back in 08:28 the US banks and these things and also 08:30 makes a many many oil projects 08:34 profitable overnight one thing is the 08:36 North Sea oil project and also the 08:39 Alaskan pipeline deal in these things 08:41 and I think it was the researcher or 08:43 financial writer FY main dog what he's 08:45 written a lot about that and he actually 08:46 has the documents from Bilderberg in the 08:49 meeting and I think in May of 72 when 08:52 the decision to foment a war was taken 08:54 and that's what we call the Yom Kippur 08:56 War and that's when everyone started 08:57 hating Arabs oil so that this brings on 09:02 the oil shocks and the stagflation 1970s 09:06 and at the same time that of course that 09:09 they ushered in the era of inflation the 09:12 banks are kind enough to issue in the 09:13 era of the credit card so what they take 09:16 away in the basement they give for you 09:17 and credit a compound interest of course 09:19 and this yeah yeah and that's also when 09:22 he said wages when wages stagnated and 09:25 they've never recovered 09:26 and for the for the for the working man 09:30 this had a profound cultural effect on 09:33 society yeah 09:33 cultural effect because the two-income 09:36 family gave would should have present a 09:39 an illusion of prosperity of high income 09:41 because you have more income coming in 09:43 and it changes consumption patterns 09:46 things like that because no longer your 09:49 your earning to get by earning your 09:50 earning to consume and you're buying 09:52 things you're not building savings and 09:55 not building equity and then going in 09:57 the debt to consume and they can this 09:59 goes to this and this goes a long way 10:00 towards creating this debt based 10:02 consumer society which corporate America 10:06 and the banks wanted and you know it 10:10 changed people's expectations what was 10:12 normal and you saw this that this also 10:14 coincides with the sort of the the 10:17 coming-of-age of the feminist movement 10:18 it had is of course that's its origins 10:21 late 50s and early 60s betty Friedan and 10:24 Gloria Steinem but really came of age in 10:26 the 1970s and that's what pop culture 10:28 picked it up and you saw it being pretty 10:30 put patrina on television you had this 10:33 idea of the battle of the sexes you had 10:34 this fixed tennis match between Bobby 10:36 Riggs Billie Jean King you know you know 10:39 where she defeats him turns out it was 10:43 most likely fixed Bobby Riggs made the 10:46 ridiculous claim that any man could beat 10:47 any woman that's an absurd claim but it 10:49 turns out that that was just there's you 10:52 know surprise surprise it was a 10:53 publicity stunt nevertheless this war 10:56 the sexist thing is that that's the you 10:58 know all this nonsense in the nineteen 11:00 seventies and it had you know this 11:01 profound effect of course 1973 you have 11:05 the legalization of abortion the Supreme 11:09 Court and this obviously goes towards 11:13 the population war decline birth you 11:18 know attempted to climb to lower the 11:20 birth rate and that also coincides with 11:25 the the sexual revolution sort of its 11:28 second phase in the nineteen seventies 11:30 because you mentioned that 60s she got 11:31 the counterculture movement needed the 11:34 spreading you mentioned the sort of 11:36 normalization of pornography in the 11:39 1970s 11:40 that's I think deep throat was put in a 11:43 mainstream theater and that was a big I 11:47 think there was 1971 or something so 11:49 yeah so the profound effect the 11:52 seventies one thing the sentences you 11:55 you were still if you were observant you 11:57 could still see remnants of sort of the 11:59 older culture people still kind of 12:02 expecting it and but by the end of the 12:06 decade of the 1980s had been washed away 12:08 and you know so that's my observation I 12:11 experienced as a child but what I do 12:13 experience gas lines and these things 12:15 were created because they've never there 12:17 wasn't any shortage of gasoline but I 12:20 remember waiting in gas lines I remember 12:21 with inflation now buttons under the 12:23 Ford administration as his his plan to 12:27 fight inflation was to just wear buttons 12:29 and it's you know what I you know all 12:35 those things are all I want to talk just 12:37 like elaborate on a few of the point you 12:40 made I mean the first is that the 12:44 generation gap that had begun in the 60s 12:49 which was created obviously by the 12:51 counterculture operation it continued 12:55 because the the disco movement became 12:59 such a powerful media phenomena it 13:03 actually drove the fashion of the young 13:05 people and so you can see that there was 13:08 really you know III believe that disco 13:12 was basically just part of the operation 13:14 it was just the next phase and even 13:16 though it was completely different in 13:19 its costuming it was still a very 13:24 distinct you know bifurcation form the 13:28 clothing that that middle-class people 13:29 wore the kind of clothes that the disco 13:33 kids would wear was very outrageous and 13:36 and distinct and so it helped to take 13:39 the baby boomer you know away from the 13:42 cultural influences of the family that 13:45 it produced and then prepare him for you 13:51 know basically the 13:54 neo American existence where you don't 13:58 have families the male's basically will 14:02 you know spend time as you know kind of 14:05 sexual predators and the women if they 14:09 have children are out of wedlock and the 14:13 government you know supports both sides 14:15 the movie Saturday Night Fever even 14:19 though it's kind of you know 14:20 characterized as almost you know heroic 14:24 you know tribute to this this young man 14:27 struggle for independence if you look at 14:30 it in the right perspective you can see 14:31 it's just a cultural pornography you 14:36 know the that the kind of sexual hookups 14:39 that were going on you know in in the 14:42 film and you know just a casual attitude 14:45 toward drugs and alcohol the very you 14:49 know kind of the outrageous clothing and 14:53 and really in the discotheque what you 14:57 what you really saw were two phenomena 15:01 that that had been touched upon in the 15:04 60s but really weren't you know 15:08 developed any extent and those are 15:11 integration and gay and lesbian kind of 15:16 lifestyles the disco started really as a 15:22 you know a gay dance movement and you 15:28 know if you if you hadn't been in these 15:30 clubs in say Marina del Rey in Los 15:33 Angeles in the 70s you could see that 15:35 they were highly integrated there were 15:38 lots of black 15:39 you know people there and they were 15:43 dancing they were there or they were you 15:45 know kind of paralyzed as great dancers 15:48 but there are also a tremendous amount 15:50 of gay people gay people started to you 15:52 know make up this is where they would 15:54 they would you know be if they were 15:56 going to be in integrated culture this 15:58 is where there would be a lot of the 16:00 original dance clubs were basically gay 16:03 bars you know and they were they were 16:06 separate 16:07 there was a well-known guy David Moscow 16:11 so I think the name he he had a club in 16:15 New York and this sort of became the 16:17 prototype for like studio I suppose him 16:22 some drawing wax like studio 51 54 54 16:27 ready and so now in those places you 16:29 know they were famous for risque sex 16:33 the these clubs in San Francisco you had 16:37 a transition from the youth culture 16:39 basically into the disco scene which was 16:42 kind of a quasi gay bathhouse dancing 16:47 and you know then at the end of the 70s 16:52 in the 80s you had the so-called HIV 16:55 epidemic 16:56 and and when they went in to study that 17:00 because they needed for you know like 17:03 pandemic control they wanted to get some 17:06 statistics I got a chance to look at the 17:09 studies that were done and this really 17:11 shows you kind of the cultural direction 17:14 that we had come from like the 50's to 17:17 this present time you know in the early 17:19 80s so you could reflect on what 17:21 happened to 70 in the study they did 17:24 they had a median for the the could you 17:30 know the peak the groups they were 17:30 studying and that number was 300 sex 17:34 partners a year so in other words they 17:37 had half of the people they were 17:39 studying and and these were individuals 17:41 who had either had HIV of course 17:44 supposably or were very young vulnerable 17:47 to getting in they had 300 was the 17:52 median sex partners so this is really 17:54 you know degeneracy he right it's just 17:56 out-and-out degeneracy and it was 17:58 manifesting not just in HIV but it is 18:01 you can imagine and every other sexual 18:04 transmitted disease imaginable 18:07 now HIV appears to have been a fraud 18:09 because they claimed it was going to 18:11 break out into the heterosexual 18:13 community and it was 18:14 going to you know wipe out mankind this 18:16 never happened but the the transmission 18:20 of sexually contracted diseases you know 18:24 is basically as has been on the increase 18:27 ever since that so you can see that we 18:31 we went through the sexual transition 18:33 right in in the 70s and it was then you 18:35 can see it you had you had the gay 18:38 lifestyle a Michael Jones talks about 18:42 America being a gay disco right he uses 18:45 that as a not as a term of endearment 18:47 you know but that that's a nation that 18:50 has a moral degeneracy to it and the gay 18:55 disco is really just from these 18:57 statistics is really a you know an 19:01 incredible focus of degeneracy right 19:03 well yeah it seems like we're just 19:05 spinning around and around direction 19:06 with no progress yeah the music's like 19:10 that yeah exactly you know and there's 19:12 no moral order to it at all and and and 19:15 the hookups of sexual hookups are 19:17 basically every night I mean if you have 19:20 like 600 sex partners a year I mean that 19:24 that seems to me to be like a full-time 19:25 job yeah you met you said fever what 19:28 remember from the flu I remember John - 19:31 volta character his home life his father 19:34 was an emasculated male unemployed 19:36 bitter man yeah yeah and there's kind of 19:39 this this is how the economic conditions 19:42 of the seventies there to ruin the male 19:43 authority to weaken the wage earner and 19:46 he has little he has weakened Authority 19:50 in the home because he's unemployed and 19:53 John has it has to go out and help 19:55 families make ends meet by working at 19:57 the local hardware store or something 19:58 yeah pain story and and he wants to 20:02 advance to get a outfit so he can dance 20:05 in it so it's just but but the key to 20:09 that movie the thing that really shows 20:10 that though they're kind of the mind 20:13 control that's being exerciser is that 20:16 the really important character to me is 20:18 Travolta's brother who was a Catholic 20:21 priest who basically was turning in you 20:25 know his his priestly vows 20:28 yeah you know he had a crisis of faith 20:30 and he and he says you know I don't 20:32 really want to do this anymore and then 20:35 he goes and watches John Travolta dance 20:38 on the dance floor and thinks this is 20:40 terrific like maybe this is where I 20:42 should head instead of you know so so 20:45 this was you know I mean and the guy who 20:48 wrote it or forget his name but he was 20:49 the Jewish guy you know making a comment 20:53 on Italian culture Italian Catholic 20:56 culture yeah it's very you know 20:59 damaging and and in itself and also you 21:03 know I really would like to know you 21:05 know how he got these images where they 21:07 came from because you know I think 21:10 they're they're you know they're all 21:11 come they were sort of true being there 21:13 were Italian guys you could say George 21:15 will care really was you know that's not 21:17 something out of outer space 21:19 and there were Catholic priests kind of 21:21 having crisis as a faith that during 21:23 this period but I just wonder why these 21:26 elements were selected to make a movie 21:28 out of you know because you know when 21:33 you when you look at the background of 21:36 disco 21:37 you don't really I can't really trace it 21:39 into like Freemasonry I have a hard time 21:42 doing that normally I can see 21:44 connections that the Masons are involved 21:46 in some way but I can't really find it 21:48 in disco but you know what I really see 21:51 are first of all lots and lots of black 21:53 people because it does to some extent 21:55 come from a lot of their music II then 21:57 you see just tons of Jewish people there 22:00 everywhere inside the creation of the 22:03 disco from Fran Lebowitz whatever name 22:06 is the journalist to the guys who 22:09 created the Village People 22:11 it's very slitters yes he read like 64 22:14 so do 50 born you wonder what an X going 22:16 on or what what what what you know 22:20 appeals to them about this cultural 22:23 phenomena because you know i don't know 22:27 i the the the jewish guys i know 22:30 couldn't dance at all yeah it's similar 22:32 to the jazz scene isn't it yeah it's 22:35 very similar you know and you know i 22:37 suspect a conspiracy tempt you know why 22:40 because i I just can't imagine anything 22:44 other than a conspiracy getting white 22:46 guys on a dance floor yeah what the heck 22:51 is going on this is not our normal thing 22:53 that one of the one of the great moments 22:55 in the rebellion from you know like 22:58 modern culture for white guys is to walk 23:02 away from you know the dance world it's 23:04 just not our normal thing no it's just 23:06 not yet just not it's just us you know 23:09 and so if we're in that world we're 23:11 being pulled in and it isn't we're never 23:13 going to succeed in it 23:16 we're being put in a situation will 23:17 never be made fun of exactly and they 23:20 dance yeah quistis think there's a 23:23 reaction to this disco Christian the 23:26 disco sucks movement if you recall I 23:27 mean that was sure and that was a do and 23:30 it gets it calm elated I think in the 23:32 night in the summer of 79 it's kind of 23:34 like this discos already fizzling out so 23:36 pop culture is always behind the curve a 23:39 little bit the in Comiskey Park I think 23:41 Chicago arson local DJ blew up a 23:44 thousand disco records before a baseball 23:46 game or after a baseball game or 23:47 something but but you know the the thing 23:54 is is that if you looked at sort of the 23:59 what you know how the people involved in 24:02 and how they characterize it they 24:04 basically said is that look you know 24:06 we're we're opposed to you know 24:10 homosexual and black culture yeah this 24:13 is actually what they said I don't have 24:15 any quotes in front of me to that effect 24:16 but I can remember I could find them if 24:19 people want want me to find them they 24:22 there was very clear that that was 24:24 really what they're about and they were 24:25 saying now it's not racism we don't hate 24:27 you we just don't want to like be like 24:29 in a situation where their culture is 24:32 basically something that you know is 24:35 being promoted it's it's it's like they 24:37 could see that the people in Comiskey 24:40 Park who 24:41 rioted just kind of I think emotionally 24:45 understood that what was going on wasn't 24:48 just you know a fad but was actually 24:51 something that was dangerous to their 24:52 culture hehe so so that's that's how I 24:55 looked at it I you know I'm sure it you 24:57 know it varies from person to person and 24:59 there's no question that you know you 25:01 can find individuals who had a bad place 25:03 in their heart but you know nevertheless 25:10 you know it I think okay so I have a 25:15 quote here there was this guy now he's 25:18 not really sort of you know I'm thinking 25:21 about more the Comiskey Park guys but 25:23 there was there was guys who wrote that 25:24 you know he says he says you know disco 25:28 was a result of an unholy union between 25:30 homosexuals and blacks right and that 25:34 was legs McNeil yes interesting 25:36 interesting you know yeah and you see 25:38 that okay so so that's that is probably 25:42 a kind of a cultural symptom you know 25:46 that he that the individual is not 25:47 really thinking deeply about this but he 25:50 just senses that that these that there 25:53 is a you know something happening to to 25:56 basically European culture in America 25:58 and and why is this going on you know 26:03 you this is where you have to spend more 26:06 time and research Tim is that I I just 26:10 don't think these things are happening 26:12 spontaneously I don't think that you 26:15 know white European guys are deciding to 26:18 wear polyester pants and dance to boogie 26:21 fever in these nightclubs spontaneously 26:23 II I think that culture is being dragged 26:26 into this direction and I think 26:28 basically the boomer the baby boomer 26:30 this the largest demographic fraction 26:33 you know the one that they really wanted 26:35 to change culturally I think they're 26:37 being targeted you know you had the 26:39 Vietnam War and the counterculture in 26:42 the 60s and then you have basically the 26:45 onset of integration homosexuality right 26:49 these cultures and of course feminism 26:53 okay so that that was a 26:55 that and that component of it and I also 26:58 just wanted to mention that you know you 26:59 talk about the statistics of feminism 27:02 and it just showed you how statistics 27:05 are slippery I don't have you ever saw 27:09 Thomas Sol the black economist argue a 27:14 feminist it's famous YouTube video and 27:17 he points out that that the inequality 27:20 and wage earning between men and women 27:23 is actually untrue it's just a question 27:26 of how you frame the statistics because 27:28 if you look at women who had the same 27:31 educational level and who had unbroken 27:34 careers right then then the the wages 27:39 would become almost you know at par 27:41 between the two groups it was when you 27:42 started to make these changes in 27:46 lifestyle activity because of the woman 27:48 being involved in family life that then 27:52 you started having these big changes but 27:54 you see and I've never seen this done 27:57 but I think it would be a great 27:58 statistical project to do is the parody 28:02 that men and women are achieving is all 28:05 achieved therefore based on the 28:08 information that Sol was presenting by 28:11 the destruction of things that are 28:13 beneficial to the lives of mothers he 28:17 you see what I mean yes you the two are 28:20 completely related in other words you 28:22 get if you take away X amount of time 28:25 from with children you would on the 28:28 other end you would have closer to 28:31 parody if you have more a larger 28:34 fraction of women without husbands then 28:36 you would have another increment moving 28:38 toward parody all of the things that 28:40 move toward parody by necessity 28:44 destroyed the stay-at-home mom 28:47 integrated you know family so that's why 28:50 the whole function of feminism as it's 28:54 been you know created as an economic 28:57 thing since Gloria Steinem has just been 28:59 nothing but a weapon against the family 29:01 yeah it's too uh it's if you measure 29:08 femininity by masculine standards it's 29:12 like yeah and so it say anything is 29:15 feminine 29:15 the irony is it's feminism but they they 29:19 insult or they assault everything that 29:21 is genuinely feminine because it's us 29:23 yeah they don't ideologically they don't 29:27 acknowledge the legitimacy of 29:28 differences the complementarity 29:30 differences between the sexes and it is 29:33 as an index there it's almost like the 29:34 Pops of popsicle index of Katherine 29:37 Austin fits where she correlates the 29:39 growth of the Dow Jones Industrial 29:41 Average or the decline of of the quality 29:43 of life in neighborhoods and there's a 29:46 connection there and I don't think it 29:47 just coincidental yeah because you know 29:49 obviously or if you control for 29:51 lifestyle choices and workforce 29:54 participation men and women's incomes 29:57 are roughly the same it's just a women 29:58 when they get married 29:59 work less and they devote more even now 30:02 when they when they have children they 30:04 devote more time to family to due to 30:06 domestic concerns than the man does 30:09 men's income actually increases when he 30:11 gets married women's income drops and 30:13 it's not oppression it's because they're 30:15 simply making choices in their lives 30:16 based on their own preferences and what 30:18 they think is best for their family and 30:20 that drives feminism feminist insane so 30:24 they pull out this very crude statistic 30:25 comparing apples to oranges are very 30:28 different you men and women have very 30:29 different workforce participation and 30:31 different phases in their life so you 30:33 cannot you know just yeah Thomas still 30:35 did a good job of pointing out that you 30:36 cannot compare the two without 30:38 addressing these details or distinctions 30:40 or that that are behind these statistics 30:44 men we don't anticipate different in the 30:46 workforce so you can't get exactly and 30:47 and if you drop out if you know if your 30:50 career is not basically contiguous if 30:55 you drop out for a couple years to focus 30:58 completely on children then you have a 31:01 different economic perspective from the 31:04 you know from up an employer if you're 31:07 you if you go straight through from the 31:10 time you're 24 to when you retire at 65 31:12 your trajectory is just different than 31:15 someone that drops out for two years 31:17 that's players look at that so the fact 31:20 that women 31:21 had that as something that was likely to 31:23 happen to them that was something that 31:25 was completely desirable that was 31:28 completely necessary for culture you met 31:30 you know my interview with e Michael 31:32 Jones of the link between feminism and 31:34 obesity and it makes sense if you think 31:38 about yet because people are now eating 31:41 processed food junk food fast food they 31:43 don't have the benefit of someone 31:44 cooking from scratch and from healthy 31:46 young taking time to put to prepare a 31:50 healthy meal and that has long-term you 31:53 know bright spread effects on the 31:54 quality of life that means the value of 31:57 someone at home just organizing the home 31:59 taking care of it and that being 32:00 denigrated as being i'm not gonna be in 32:02 1950s mother i'm not award yeah I'm 32:04 gonna June Cleaver thing in these things 32:06 as if that's the you know that's that 32:09 there's that's the sec yeah it's the 32:11 choice we have as if that as if that was 32:12 reality but um yeah I mean so if you're 32:18 not gonna have someone at home in there 32:23 at work that's it's gonna be a lot a lot 32:25 of things aren't gonna get done one 32:27 thing is a meal and you can write and 32:29 also you're depressed all the time 32:31 because you're living alone and so you 32:34 want nothing but comfort food who has 32:37 you know and since you're a single 32:39 person usually with some support from 32:42 the government you can't really afford 32:44 decent food so you're just gonna have 32:45 junk food and ice cream yeah and you 32:49 know you'll wave 400 pounds when you're 32:51 50 and die of diabetes I mean this is 32:54 not a life that you know this style of 32:59 life is not defensible it's not healthy 33:01 yeah so and so the 70s is really you 33:05 know that decade you could see that the 33:08 Boomer have been drugged out given 33:13 mysticism you know and the values of 33:16 archaic culture and it was all set for 33:21 the disco well I mean if you look at a 33:22 conspiracy if you want a high-level 33:25 malevolence we do get some of that in 33:28 the 70s with the Stanford Research 33:32 Institute so changing images 33:33 man right where they talk about that 33:35 very thing promoting mysticism sort of 33:39 doing away with industrial society that 33:42 because that goes in line with the 33:45 economic problem a current Kannamma 33:46 policies is one thing when they in when 33:49 they enthroned the petro dollar whether 33:53 it did was that created the macro 33:54 environment where the US would be 33:57 gradually de-industrialized because what 33:59 it did was it made the dollar 34:01 artificially strong which makes exports 34:04 more US exports more expensive but it 34:07 also makes imports cheaper so what 34:10 happens is eventually it no longer 34:12 becomes economically viable have 34:14 factories in the United States because 34:15 it's cheaper to produce them because 34:17 because the overvalued dollar because 34:19 you can you can buy more with the dollar 34:21 so instead of producing goods and in a 34:25 sense usually those goods to buy you 34:26 know to trade with other goods which we 34:28 do with dollars when you have this 34:29 overinflated dollar you can just produce 34:32 paper and inflate to bring in the 34:34 imports but it results in your 34:36 deindustrialization the over 34:37 financialization of your economy which 34:39 of course both great brittany any nights 34:41 nine states experience different times 34:43 because we when you have a varied 34:45 currency but this is also one of things 34:47 is this also has a broad cultural effect 34:50 which coincides with the agenda spelled 34:53 out in the changing images of man it's 34:55 hard to believe there's been some 34:56 coordination going along there you also 34:58 there's like I think in 75 or so six 35:01 years this ramble a conference where 35:03 they decided that in this case it was 35:05 Germany that Germany was gonna outsource 35:08 its text it's very profitable and 35:10 efficient textile Minh to cheap 35:13 third-world labor and the same time you 35:15 have Kissinger with national security 35:16 security study memorandum two hundred 35:19 devising this Malthusian plan to starve 35:21 and and drown the third world in debt 35:24 with higher energy prices and they 35:27 stabilize it and this is also creating 35:29 the conditions in the third world which 35:31 a generation later would produce chief 35:33 labor you know right right right 35:36 well you see it's interesting in that um 35:39 you know to the SR I the Stanford 35:44 Research Institute 35:46 you know Willis Harriman was the 35:49 director of it 35:52 he was an MKULTRA just right and so you 35:58 know there you have both the future of 36:02 culture and then also the nefarious and 36:05 secret government experiments in the 36:07 mind-control SR I was caught using these 36:12 low-frequency experimental techniques on 36:15 human beings which was complete it was 36:17 against actually the the Geneva 36:20 Convention 36:21 that's how illegal was when the Navy 36:23 found out about it they they put the 36:25 kibosh on it and then Harriman arranged 36:28 to have funding come in to a secret 36:30 source he actually circumvented a direct 36:33 order by the you know from the commander 36:35 of the Navy presumably and and @sr I was 36:41 net Stanford right working with with 36:45 Willis Harriman now Nevitt amazingly had 36:50 worked on the american-jewish committees 36:53 for a personality was one of the 36:55 signatures one of those six signatures 36:56 of it or I think maybe more but certain 36:59 I can think of six and so you know 37:02 wouldn't you when you see these 37:04 connections man 37:06 it just seems hard to believe that this 37:08 isn't organized and in fact it that is 37:10 you know of course was it martyred me 37:12 and also connected to the cheating 37:14 images of man sure and so that Chris's 37:17 her husband Gregory Bateson and the CIA 37:19 these things yeah and any question 37:22 mentioned the authoritarian personality 37:24 which one of the agenda was to promote 37:25 over-sexualization and Chris you you get 37:29 that one of the at least one the 37:31 consequences that you could say would be 37:32 the the main the gradual mainstreaming 37:37 and promotion of gay rights gay culture 37:39 and and disco music yeah right that's 37:43 why you know it's really important when 37:45 you when you think of the the American 37:47 Jewish committees promotion of the 37:49 authoritarian personality and you look 37:50 at what they're saying and chapter 23 37:54 you know where they're outlining the 37:55 future and they talk about how eros is 37:57 going to be you 37:58 and they it's going to be propaganda 38:01 it's going to transcend normal 38:03 psychological techniques it's gonna be 38:05 done on a mass scale well what in the 38:08 heck are they talking about it's easy to 38:11 understand because you can see the 38:12 concept reused by Herbert Marcuse who 38:16 was in this in this group he was you 38:18 know from the the he had been with org 38:24 or no and and Orkin himer at the in you 38:29 know in the organization that they had 38:31 before the the committee had hired them 38:35 and so with with Marcos you've got a 38:40 real clear in Harrison civilization 38:42 you've got the term used and now you can 38:44 see that he's talking about polysexual 38:47 ISM this was really the first time I 38:49 think that homosexuality as a lifestyle 38:53 was being promoted to the baby boomer it 38:56 didn't happen so much in the 60s but 38:59 when when you had mark oozes book become 39:02 so popular eros and civilization that 39:05 was really when you started to see the 39:07 the plan that was laid out you know by 39:13 by the conclusion of you know their 39:16 territory and personality you could see 39:18 a start to get into the 70s you know 39:21 yeah you had this the mythos around the 39:23 Stonewall Riots exactly yeah 39:26 you know the this bar that was broken up 39:29 curses the Center for human trafficking 39:31 drug trafficking in the cops can't 39:33 busted it up and it was a gay bar and 39:36 there's you know somebody's head 39:38 knocking and some violence and these 39:40 things and there's a riot broke out and 39:42 that's sort of have a sort of well 39:45 that's how they should have piggybacked 39:49 on the civil rights meme you know you 39:53 know you know the cops like Bull Connor 39:55 and the homosexuals were like blacks and 39:57 the gay rights but yeah sort of this gay 39:59 rights thing became they became the new 40:01 civil rights movement promoted again 40:03 monitored by organized organized Jewish 40:06 organizations yeah and so is yet 40:11 the connection is there it's very 40:13 interesting and then you know we hear 40:14 about you know no it's been sort of mmm 40:17 mythologized Stonewall Riots and these 40:20 things as to coming out and then yeah 40:22 it's fascinating because see I I really 40:24 think that it's you know because okay so 40:28 you don't we talk about the Stonewall 40:30 right okay so whoa were they created or 40:34 was it just that the pressure on the 40:37 media to focus on things that you know 40:41 the the few who were inside the the plan 40:44 wanted to be represented if that was 40:46 that really how it was done yeah and I 40:48 tend to you know guess to the latter 40:52 because I haven't seen any evidence of 40:54 the former I think that you know they 40:56 wanted to sexualize and Polly sexualized 41:00 culture and so when you had the the you 41:04 know this tone when the Stonewall riots 41:06 occurred they were just promoted far 41:09 beyond any kind of legitimate news story 41:11 that they might have you know 41:12 represented was just they were that 41:16 these stories were everywhere you know 41:18 and so this is this is how I think it 41:21 was being done I think that you know you 41:23 look at like Saturday Night Fever the 41:26 movie you look at you know how the music 41:30 on FM was changed from you know kind of 41:33 acid rock and suddenly started having 41:36 that all of the dance music you know 41:38 become very very you know played very 41:41 often these are the ways that that 41:43 culture can be shaped they don't you 41:45 don't necessarily have to have you know 41:47 a plan for something like this 41:49 Pacifica's Woodstock you can just shape 41:52 it by making sure that the things that 41:55 promote the the perspective that you 41:57 want to have you know manifested that 42:00 these things are what gets the publicity 42:01 and then that this is particularly the 42:04 case when you've already set in motion 42:06 you know kind of the in terms of 42:11 polysexual ism when you've already got 42:13 you know the archaic revival values and 42:17 Woodstock and you know 42:19 everyone is kind of a child of God sort 42:22 of sort of perspective there's no 42:24 cultural dimensions or structures or our 42:26 limitations and taboos 42:28 here comes disk attack and who's to say 42:31 you know that well just because the gays 42:36 in the club have a degenerate lifestyle 42:39 who's to say that this is immoral I mean 42:41 remember you're in the eros and 42:42 civilization the polysexual ISM world 42:45 they had an intellectual intimidation 42:48 behind them whereas in the 50s that was 42:51 just the opposite 42:53 the intimidation worked the other way 42:55 and it kind of kept that particularly 42:58 degenerate sexual behavior sequestered 43:00 yeah there was yeah you would you it was 43:03 get alized 43:03 yeah if it's gonna exist at all that's 43:05 how it should be treated yeah and that's 43:08 what you know when I think you know when 43:09 you think about like mark coos how 43:12 instrumental he was and how he was 43:13 really a bridge between Woodstock and 43:16 the discotheque you've got to look at 43:19 him as a member of the Frankfurt School 43:21 and then you know you have to see well 43:24 what does this really represent what 43:26 cultural perspective is being you know 43:29 shown here and and I I think I've read 43:32 you know a couple times you know that 43:36 was Lucas in the Hungarian soviet-backed 43:40 into the 20s he was the one that that 43:43 really began the polysexual ISM anti 43:47 marriage sex education and Hungary 43:50 before he was kicked out and he also was 43:52 bringing forward the concept of the 43:54 fairytale and fantasies you know kind of 43:56 a Disneyland sort of thing these things 43:58 are all popping up in the 70s you know 44:00 they're all coming to fruition and so 44:04 it's it's like you had had said so 44:07 clearly and you know I still think it's 44:10 something that we every one should be 44:11 aware of and focus on is that we're 44:14 trying to build out of schematic you 44:15 know we look at our culture today and 44:17 it's just you know it's just degenerate 44:21 well how did we get here we need to know 44:23 that so we can make changes and and you 44:27 know try to try to recover and try to 44:29 repair the damage try to head try to 44:31 build a future and so we need to know 44:34 well who was organizing the destruction 44:36 how did they do this you know and that's 44:38 why you know the the authoritarian 44:41 personality the Frankfurt School 44:42 documents MKULTRA you know these things 44:46 are all all related they're all linked 44:48 and they all end up in our destruction 44:51 and in the destruction of our culture so 44:53 the schematic helps build them out and 44:55 that's why you know these events they 44:58 may seem unrelated but man they are very 45:01 very important and the glass thing I 45:03 wanted to say was just on the gold 45:04 standard you know Tim you're so right 45:07 about that when they got us off the gold 45:10 standard they created the potential for 45:12 unlimited debt for the by the government 45:15 and this is what of course led to the 45:17 wars and you know the militarization and 45:20 all of the the enormous expansion of 45:22 government technology if if they hadn't 45:26 gotten off of the gold standard then 45:30 America's gold and would have been 45:33 drained you know in a matter of years 45:34 and then we would have been forced to 45:37 try to replenish the gold or reduce 45:40 spending right yeah the gold standard 45:43 was done away with then they the 45:46 government debt expansion couldn't begin 45:48 and and and like you also pointed out 45:51 the other part of that was the 45:53 petrodollar is that well if you know 45:55 because the the the natural reaction to 45:58 that is to say well the dollar doesn't 45:59 have any value but because the u.s. 46:01 controlled the Middle East they could 46:05 insist that the only thing that you 46:07 could purchase oil with was dollars and 46:09 thereby you actually created a you know 46:12 evaluation that unlike gold which had 46:14 the kind of scarcity at that time as 46:17 they look forward there was an unlimited 46:19 supply of oil but it was always going to 46:21 be needed and used for something and so 46:23 therefore they created to the same 46:26 extent that oil and when you looked into 46:27 the future was unlimited almost in the 46:29 seventies or you know there was there 46:32 was there was no time when it would stop 46:34 being produced or so much of it that 46:36 that their expansion of debt could go on 46:39 indefinitely and so then then then you 46:42 then that now linking to this of course 46:44 is the beginning of neoconservatism 46:47 right which which kind of has its 46:49 beginnings in the end of the 70s you 46:53 know it kind of Bob's and weeds a bit 46:55 but but it you know you can kind of see 46:57 it start to come forward in in the in 47:00 the 70s where you would have constant 47:03 intervention that the philosophy of 47:05 intervention caused an invention us 47:07 would become the World Cup because we 47:09 had infinite money right so we could we 47:13 could take on something as costly as 47:15 that yeah and any any if any country 47:21 decided to go rogue and get outside the 47:24 the dollars dollar eyes global economy 47:27 then they became an enemy that needed to 47:30 be disciplined or government need to be 47:33 toppled and couldn't buy or yeah 47:35 couldn't buy also and that's why you 47:36 would we see that today with with you 47:38 know that was China Russia and these 47:39 things and they're trying to maneuver 47:41 outside the dollar and these things but 47:43 yeah the rise of neoconservative is very 47:45 interesting because you kind of see that 47:46 I mean we've talked about the sort of 47:48 the the wasp Jewish alliance 47:51 particularly you know with even going 47:53 too far back to Paul Mostyn and and 47:56 Great Britain and Zionism in these 47:58 things and there's a question of who was 47:59 a junior partner who was a senior 48:01 partner in this relationship but it 48:03 seemed to be in the by the 1970s 48:05 particularly into the decade because you 48:07 had the death of Nelson Rockefeller in 48:09 john d rockefeller the third and sort of 48:11 the decline of overt wasp power and sort 48:16 of the ascendancy of Jewish power the 48:19 sort of it became overt in the 1970s and 48:22 this also coincided with the development 48:26 of the Holocaust mythos that became the 48:30 dominant theme or interpretation the 48:34 second world war that was that's a 48:35 relatively new phenomenon the 1970s and 48:38 that became very important but after 73 48:41 your the rise of neoconservatism 48:44 this also you have in the 1970s you had 48:50 these these hearings like the the 48:52 Rockefeller Commission and the church 48:55 Kermit the Piper Commission on these 48:57 abuses of the intelligence community is 48:59 limited hangout so we got some glimpse 49:00 in what was going on and you know Jimmy 49:03 Carter come you know becomes of course 49:05 in between you have this Ford presidency 49:08 this odd HughesNet man who was never 49:10 elected he got in because because of 49:12 Watergate which seemed to be in an Intel 49:14 operation against the the Nixon Minister 49:17 he was sort of maneuver maneuvered into 49:19 that by one HW Bush who had deep 49:22 intelligence connections but I'm next to 49:26 falls of course so does Spiro Agnew and 49:29 so for it becomes vice-president the 49:32 Nixon falls in for becomes president and 49:34 he picks with Nelson Rockefeller is vice 49:36 president then in the late summer of 49:38 1975 to Gert women shoot at fourth one 49:45 is a squeaky Fromme of Manson a 49:48 collector and the other one I think is 49:50 Sara Jane Moore who had connections to 49:53 the Hearst to the Hearst kidnapping she 49:57 was obsessed with the Hearst case but 49:58 she herself was an FBI Informer it's a 50:00 really strange case so but Kris Ford 50:03 survives then goes on to lose to Jimmy 50:05 Carter in 1976 Carter sort of appears to 50:09 be an outsider he's that's how he's 50:11 marketed of course he was picked by 50:12 David Rockefeller he was a trilateral 50:14 list and trilateral zone plays big into 50:17 the decisions of 1973 the sort of 50:19 deindustrialization and the gradual and 50:21 the the in the the industrialization of 50:24 China which is beginning in the late 50:26 1970s and 80s under Rockefeller auspices 50:30 but um but you have a harder kind of get 50:33 has this war with the CIA 50:35 and he fires Ted Shackley or he says his 50:40 see a guy stands for Turner fires Ted 50:43 Shackley Shaklee had eyes on the being 50:44 the director of CIA but then when Carter 50:47 won the election his dream of when an 50:49 assay was crushed so he went into 50:51 private industry kinda started 50:53 intelligence private intelligence 50:54 network but in the late seventies yet 50:57 thing called the 50:58 the Safari Club and Safari Club were a 51:01 group of a bunch of Spooks international 51:02 spooks from various countries they got 51:04 together and they said because the CIA 51:06 had been so hamstrung because the 51:08 committee hearings they enter started a 51:10 private intelligence network and this 51:12 place by the loom I think this looms 51:15 rather large in the in the crisis of the 51:16 late 1970s in the second oil shock 51:18 because as it turns out it was the US 51:22 government sort of engineered this 51:23 Charles fall in the 1978 and and they 51:27 certainly was the intelligence agencies 51:29 have facilitated the rise of Khomeini of 51:31 course we think of Khomeini and the 51:32 mullahs in Iran is being in the enemy 51:34 but looks like that crisis was created 51:37 sort of as one thing to create another 51:41 oil shock and the second thing to 51:44 undermine the Carter Administration of 51:46 course what we have with the event you 51:49 have with the Iranian Revolution in rise 51:51 you know the theocracy this the mullahs 51:54 come to power and you have the seizure 51:56 of the American Embassy in November 1979 51:59 and that's brought about because Carter 52:02 invites the Shah that the throne shot in 52:04 United States and he was he did that on 52:07 the advice of Henry Kissinger and what 52:11 they did do is that the created a 52:12 situation once the Iranians seized the 52:14 US Embassy took those 52 hostages held 52:17 them for 444 days that gave the pretext 52:21 for us to seize Iranian assets so we're 52:23 sitting in Chase Manhattan Bank Road 52:27 funny how that works out and of course 52:29 then they released their Reagan's 52:30 inauguration and that factors into the 52:32 so called member this is course this is 52:33 they can't pay of 1980 the the October 52:37 Surprise issue you know controversy 52:40 where it appears that George HW Bush and 52:44 and Cayce intervened to prolong the 52:47 hostage crisis to facilitate Ronald 52:48 Reagan's election 1980 yeah and so you 52:55 you know so there's so many details is 52:59 gonna hurt a grasp on all of them to get 53:02 you know just just a kind of to spread 53:07 them out so that people can see how 53:10 you know how it all works but you know 53:14 what's interesting is that like with 53:16 neoconservatism which is I you know I 53:19 think it clearly starts in the 70s I'm 53:22 not sure if it when it begins its you 53:25 know it's quite as intervention you know 53:29 in its philosophy but it could well be 53:32 because I really trace it like to 53:35 William Kristol and the the group that 53:40 worked for scoop Jackson the senator 53:44 from Boeing yeah that's yeah that's 53:46 right and and and during his kidding he 53:49 was like going running against McGovern 53:51 who was sort of you know this 53:53 non-intervention you know kind of more 53:56 isolated America that was focused on our 53:59 social issues but they didn't like that 54:02 and and he had scoop Jackson had if I 54:05 recall it was Doug Feith Wolfowitz and 54:08 Richard Perle and bill kristol helped 54:11 them so this was a jewish kamal i think 54:14 is a describe and they were trying to 54:18 make the intellectual argument that 54:20 isolationism was moral relativism yeah 54:24 yeah that we needed to get out in the 54:26 world and what was interesting is that 54:29 if you actually go through the the 54:30 letters of these guys you can see that 54:32 they were simply you know this whole 54:34 intellectual kind of structure that they 54:37 were trying to hoist at during this time 54:40 was a facade that really all they wanted 54:42 to do was protect israel yeah you know 54:45 you had the famous very you know 54:49 illustrative illustrative a letter that 54:52 was found from crystal bill kristol 54:56 and he said you know that it was writing 54:59 to a jewish group and he said you know 55:00 they were complaining about the cost of 55:02 america's militarism and he just 55:05 hammered him and he said look the the 55:08 reason that America needs a big military 55:11 is because that's how Israel is going to 55:13 be protected yeah right so so to him 55:16 there was no question as to why the 55:18 militarism and the the philosophy of 55:22 America intervening in everyone's 55:24 business of what it really meant he knew 55:27 that the Middle East was you know going 55:30 to attempt to you know regurgitate 55:33 Israel because they basically are trying 55:35 to establish a nation in a you know in a 55:38 an area with you know six hundred 55:40 million Muslims that have any recent 55:43 historical connection into these areas 55:45 and it was going to be a you know 55:47 basically a military process you know 55:49 you're gonna have to ram it down their 55:51 throats and so he could see it you know 55:54 you had the six-day war you know the 55:56 Israel was was obviously at risk and and 56:00 so suddenly you have the neoconservative 56:03 movement and and now what's interesting 56:06 is that I don't know if you've noticed 56:08 but a lot of people are complaining that 56:13 neoconservatism is basically just a you 56:17 know kind of euphemism for Jewish this 56:21 is fascinating to me when you think 56:23 about how how it first tried to sell 56:25 itself you know as a philosophy to 56:27 American politic because it's now the 56:33 case that people are recognizing that 56:37 the neoconservatism you know is sort of 56:40 focused oddly enough on israel i think 56:43 the claim that as anti-semitic is you 56:46 know not correct and overly broad but 56:50 the relationship between the 56:51 neoconservative movement and the 56:53 protection of israel and basically to 56:55 the to you know passionate degree 56:58 whereby america is seemingly in second 57:01 position in terms of what's important i 57:04 think there's a very legitimate 57:05 criticism of the current neoconservative 57:07 movement and so it's going to be 57:10 interesting to see you know going 57:12 forward if they're going to be able to 57:14 use the pejorative nature of the term 57:17 anti-semitism in combination with you 57:23 know the holocaust mean to to keep 57:27 neoconservatism in a position of 57:30 dominance because right now Tim it comes 57:32 from the 70s 57:33 man it's it's a disco dance that never 57:36 stopped I'm Hema 57:37 we're just completely you know in in the 57:41 control of this political movement yeah 57:43 yeah it's a bit they speak of the 57:45 problems of dual loyalty and I say what 57:47 dual loyalty would be an improvement 57:52 yeah well it's true there's no loyalty 57:59 America is just a you know and say you 58:02 know the the moral structure is I think 58:10 it's almost a distraction to even even 58:12 discuss it I mean really it's much 58:13 better just to keep the argument focused 58:15 on the secret society it dominated our 58:20 culture post-world war ii you could see 58:23 this with the creation of the CIA you 58:25 could see this with the MKULTRA research 58:28 you could see this with the government 58:29 links into the counterculture you could 58:31 see this with the manifestation of the 58:33 authoritarian personality the idea of 58:37 you know that that you know dual loyalty 58:41 and and I mean all these things to me 58:43 these are just distractions 58:45 I mean basically the real issue is just 58:47 the secret society who is it what is it 58:50 what do they want and getting the people 58:54 to know about this you know that's 58:56 that's why when you when you come to 58:58 neoconservatism I mean it's just another 59:03 aspect of the secret society right 59:07 that's all you're looking at and it in 59:09 like everything it's camouflaged it it 59:12 pretends to be this or that it has you 59:14 know people promoting it in the media as 59:16 things that really isn't but basically 59:19 it's all just part of control and it and 59:23 it's all done as a hidden agenda you 59:26 know this is all something we're not 59:27 really seeing the real reasons for 59:30 anything yeah these are the bureaucracy 59:32 the machinery of state the the legacy 59:36 media television radio the newsprint 59:40 these things of all they're all 59:41 coordinated to kind of confuse us too 59:44 you know so it sells a bill of goods too 59:48 - can you know to overwhelm us to keep 59:51 us confused in these things this is why 59:52 you can't get a clear understanding 59:53 what's going on in the world because 59:56 obviously something as beneficial as 60:00 like the Central Intelligence Agency or 60:02 the National Security Agency - the 60:04 secret society the value is obvious 60:08 because that now they have a specific 60:10 reaction machinery to carry out their 60:12 their their plans but if you just I mean 60:17 even a mainstream history history of 60:19 these organizations reveal the secret 60:21 society right with CIA even these things 60:25 all people coming from the world of 60:28 banking and finance and these elite 60:29 families that created these these 60:32 organizations like Walt you see a CIA 60:35 came from Wall Street and and in the 60:38 city of London and that's obvious for 60:40 the OSS OSS you know was organized under 60:44 the under the the to lives of British 60:47 intelligence and so you know so that so 60:52 the links are there it's just that they 60:54 create a false story to justify it to 60:56 the American people for the organization 60:58 I was a recently I went to a Mount 61:00 Vernon for Christmas with my family and 61:03 this is how it's sold and I'm they have 61:05 this you know it's kind of ridiculous 61:07 ever really elaborate museum for George 61:09 Washington it's interesting to walk 61:10 through they have videos and they have 61:13 mannequins and displays and you can see 61:17 so it's it's interesting but they have 61:19 one thing on a spy ring that were 61:22 operated during the Revolutionary War in 61:24 the United States I think it was the 61:25 Coker is the culprit gang I think I 61:27 forget that right but they're talking 61:29 what they did and some of the simplistic 61:33 these relatively what appears to be 61:35 intelligence operations how they 61:37 operated and how they dealt in espionage 61:38 and had secret messages and these things 61:40 that are transported in secret messages 61:42 but the end end of the film it says that 61:45 intelligence to this day remains vital 61:47 to national security and you see the 61:49 emblem of the central television agency 61:50 is National Security Agency so you know 61:54 so your patriotic if you support these 61:58 these 62:00 agencies of the cryptocurrency desire 62:03 criminal agencies so that's the outsold 62:06 its watching something under realization 62:09 they have you know representations of 62:14 Washington's commitment to Freemasonry 62:17 in you know on display no not much if 62:21 you look close you can see some things 62:23 like in these state glass windows you 62:24 see like a pyramid and these things so 62:26 it's there but there's no talk of 62:29 Freemasonry there's nothing like that 62:30 that's interesting do they represent him 62:32 as a Christian yes praying like it 62:36 that is very soon because they I've 62:38 actually read letters from Washington 62:41 where he Lampoon's Christians yes 62:43 how how they are and how you know 62:47 basically easy to fool and of course you 62:51 know he was he was sworn in wearing his 62:53 Masonic apron and you know I mean it was 62:56 just a Masonic ceremony I mean in what 62:59 and if I recall is a state throughout 63:02 the entire Revolutionary War period was 63:05 left unmolested by the British so yeah 63:07 how strange you know that you know this 63:10 this the revolution of were I mean it's 63:12 another one of these great Holocaust 63:15 that you start digging into it you know 63:19 I was at England a few years ago and I 63:22 mentioned this before and there was a 63:24 Brighton Palace and you can see this was 63:27 all a personal residence of the father 63:30 of the George who fought against 63:32 Washington and that George was of course 63:35 a Mason and his father I mean Tim here 63:39 there was no trying to hide the free 63:43 Masonic you know kind of allegiance that 63:47 this George had every single wall every 63:51 piece of furniture every black-and-white 63:54 tile on the floor 63:56 everything was no Mars to freemason he 63:59 it was completely the you know the 64:04 obsession of this guy's life and that's 64:07 why when you look at this struggle 64:10 between the Georges later on you know 64:12 Washington and your 64:13 I think where was it the third that okay 64:16 it sir looks artificial because you 64:19 would think that a couple Lodge brothers 64:21 could get together and if they really 64:23 wanted to avoid killing a lot of people 64:25 find a way to do it but oh no they all 64:29 wiped out a big section of the 64:31 population with the war so you know the 64:35 70s of course you know we we were 64:39 recovering from Vietnam but the I think 64:44 the one of the things that's really 64:46 tragic and sad about that decade is that 64:49 that was really the beginning of the 64:51 current militarism you know they brought 64:54 about the the salaried army like half 64:58 ended and they decided they would do and 65:00 get rid of that and just start to go to 65:02 you know hiring people and because the 65:05 economic situation was going to get 65:07 worse we were gonna outsource our whole 65:09 manufacturing industry the prospects for 65:14 the people who were going to you know 65:16 try to find work they were they were 65:18 gonna have to look to the military yeah 65:20 five if fodder for Empire yeah yeah they 65:24 would just be the fodder for Empire just 65:26 as always the students always happen and 65:28 so now you know thirty years forty years 65:31 later here we are and we're all over the 65:34 world and you know we're dying every day 65:38 I mean they've reduced you know now 65:40 we're basically the world's dictator 65:42 except you know there's opposition from 65:44 you know you know organized nations made 65:46 like China and Russia seemingly are 65:48 organizing but certainly the Western 65:51 world the u.s. is now kind of a world 65:53 dictator and it all starts from here you 65:56 know where you get rid of the gold 65:58 standard you're able to expand that 66:00 infinitely you create an army that 66:03 doesn't have any connection into moral 66:05 order direction 66:07 it's just basically a battering guard 66:09 that'll do what it's told the 66:12 development of military technology it 66:14 all starts here you know this they had 66:16 World War two as as a it's kind of an 66:18 impulse but this was really where the 66:21 high tech you know robots and the kind 66:24 of weapons that were you know we're 66:25 seeing now that 66:26 comes from here and so it's a good a 66:29 really good a decade for people to 66:32 understand you know how how it linked to 66:35 the 60s how it continued all of the same 66:38 trends there were new wrinkles brought 66:40 to it particularly the financial 66:41 wrinkles you know they talk about the 66:44 oil shocks in my opinion that was just 66:47 done because oil had to be made more 66:49 valuable since it was going to be the 66:52 the basis for you know the the dollar 66:55 transactions yeah yeah you know the mean 66:59 of oil went from 25 cents at the gallon 67:02 to over a dollar it was a 400% increase 67:04 there was that was truly shocking and 67:06 they were able to do that by the 67:08 artificial you know shortages but when 67:10 they when they created the you know the 67:13 I mean whatever what it was went from 67:15 like six dollars a barrel to twenty four 67:18 dollars grow something like that that 67:20 really created an incredible capacity 67:23 for debt expansion because when oil went 67:28 up the the need for dollars exploded you 67:33 know if you if you can only buy oil in 67:35 dollars and that was a military 67:37 structure of the United States then 67:40 you'd better have lots of dollars 67:42 available if your country you know it's 67:44 going to need oil for its for its energy 67:46 industries well the the people who 67:49 needed you know money to develop the 67:53 technology that could be used to enslave 67:55 a population then suddenly they had just 67:58 an unlimited credit card Tim you know 68:01 the Federal Reserve was now just going 68:04 to be issuing debt buying debt 68:06 everywhere and it led to the current 68:10 situation that we have now which 68:13 hopefully will not last long and there 68:16 can be some resistance organized against 68:17 it yeah and it appears to be some with 68:21 China and Russia organizing some sort of 68:23 a wan yeah they're preparing for a you 68:32 know to swap out the dollar as the 68:34 reserve currency 68:36 I think it's that's that is actually 68:38 pretty clear and I 68:40 currently is the us us that is sort of 68:43 expedited this because because there 68:45 sanctions and these things they've put 68:47 on Russia yeah give a swift closing off 68:49 of the Swift system and these things so 68:51 they're forcing the hand of some of 68:52 these countries to develop an 68:54 alternative system of course we've seen 68:56 the examples of Saddam Hussein even more 68:58 Qaddafi who have stepped up tried to 69:01 step outside at least suggested that 69:02 maybe a golden are best standard for 69:07 Africa are these things and and there's 69:11 always been attempts to take out these 69:12 other countries that looked at developed 69:13 these areas like I think Qaddafi wanted 69:15 a satellite and telecommunication system 69:17 independent outside the West and they 69:20 don't want them developing their own 69:21 resources in their own industry that's 69:22 one thing that the Rorschach's did was 69:23 it retarded or development the third 69:26 world and threw them in the debt because 69:28 that's when the IMF kicked in and 69:30 started loaning the money to pay for the 69:32 increased price of oil and the summer 69:34 stays for the debt crisis which sets the 69:36 stage for neoliberalism because with the 69:39 huge debt instead of just forgiving the 69:41 debt which a few people suggested 69:44 forgiving and they ended up dead they 69:46 were kidnapped and murdered like that 69:47 German banker yeah hair Houser I think 69:50 was his name and you also even way back 69:54 in the early sixties year the guide 69:55 matei II who ran Italy's national oil 69:58 company instead of privatizing a hint to 70:01 shares up to the Western where companies 70:03 actually used Rihanna's as a sovereign 70:05 institution started negotiating better 70:07 deals with the oil exporting countries 70:08 because his plane crashes so that that's 70:11 an old yes seems to be the pattern there 70:13 but I'm idea was um that Memphis could 70:17 step in with easy credit and of course 70:19 the collateral would be the resources 70:21 the infrastructure and a blood sweat and 70:23 tears of the people that's how its peers 70:27 to have worked in Latin America and 70:28 throughout Africa and these things and 70:30 in Europe to look at the pigs you know I 70:34 mean basically now all of their assets 70:36 are on the block Argentina is a good 70:38 example you know the IMF debt comes in 70:41 they say well you're gonna have 70:43 accelerated economic activity so you'd 70:45 be able to handle the growth you can 70:47 have activity never Excel the debts it 70:49 sits there and they go you got to pay it 70:51 back now 70:52 we're just going to take your country in 70:54 exchange for it and then bear in mind 70:57 well where did the debt where did the 70:59 money come from that was given yes home 71:03 to this nation well I just they just 71:05 invented it these this was just such a 71:07 real bank credit that had no one had 71:08 ever earned it so basically with a few 71:11 strokes of the computer they ended up 71:13 owning a country and then people is that 71:15 they're scratching their head and going 71:17 gee I 71:17 I guess I'm a debt slave but that's the 71:19 morally right thing to do 71:21 I mean wake up people you're just the 71:24 victim of these clever financials you 71:27 know you know it's a I've got to pay the 71:30 money back right you borrowed it you 71:35 gotta like like a lot of the common 71:37 people actually got to spend any of that 71:39 money yeah I know yes no they they're 71:41 just ridiculous oh so you know this is 71:44 that we're it's it's a cleverly designed 71:46 slave system it enslaves Nations and the 71:50 people inside them we Tim will build out 71:55 the schematic so people will be able to 71:57 see exactly what happened one step at a 72:00 time and link our research to all of the 72:04 hundreds and thousands of people that 72:05 are out out there now trying to you know 72:08 expose this and trying to alert the 72:10 public to phases to it you know we find 72:14 data we of course you know oftentimes we 72:18 can only create plausible conjectures 72:20 but we are able to kind of construct a 72:22 schematic so that that's the one phase 72:24 the other phase is just alerting the 72:27 public to this which everyone who 72:30 listens to our shows and sees ideas that 72:33 make sense can pass along like our 72:37 stocking stuffer concepts you know 72:39 they'd get people talking about these 72:42 things we we can't let people succumb to 72:48 intimidation 72:49 you know I know often I get accused of 72:53 anti-semitism because I keep going back 72:56 to this connection I see between masonry 73:02 and 73:03 and people who are Jews the attack on me 73:09 and this way is really you know it 73:11 doesn't move me and and I think people 73:13 who are honest will see its complete and 73:15 coherent because first of all as we 73:18 discuss it we aren't ever trying to you 73:22 know like talk about Jews in a general 73:24 sense what we have is a secret society 73:27 inside the society there are organizing 73:30 principles mm-hmm so isn't the whole 73:32 Jewish race that's making these 73:35 decisions it's a group that somehow able 73:37 is able to maintain secrecy and 73:39 ethnicity is a very good conjecture 73:44 right because so many Jews involved in 73:46 this you could easily imagine that the 73:48 secret society has a component that is a 73:51 group of people whose Jewish ethnicity 73:54 is part of how they're able to maintain 73:56 the secrecy right very simple understand 73:59 because think about you know the Mafia 74:03 right this isn't an indictment of the 74:06 Italian race you know when when you 74:09 point out that that this organization 74:11 uses ethnicity as part of omertà right 74:15 silence is maintained through to some 74:17 extent the fact that their ethnic lis 74:19 connected as part of how they're able to 74:21 do it so you know the the the people who 74:24 are trying to hurl anti-semitic you know 74:29 claim against against me I just find it 74:32 to be preposterous you know it's just 74:34 they're just it I don't even I don't 74:36 even respond to it it's simply a 74:38 distraction we're we've got to get to 74:43 the bottom of the secret society and and 74:47 you know so it isn't just like the 74:49 Jewish intellectuals like the you know 74:51 the the ones who were involved in the 74:55 creation of the authoritarian 74:56 personality or the Frankfurt School are 74:59 the many Jews in the may see conference 75:02 and things but it's also many elect 75:04 religious and economic theoreticians 75:06 like Marx and Moses has right so there 75:12 just seems to be and gangsters like Moe 75:14 Dalitz in Ireland 75:15 and let these guys write so you see it 75:18 seems like the European is kind of a 75:21 sitting duck and is the neat is easy 75:24 prey can't really defend himself because 75:29 when he tries to you know to you know to 75:33 do so he's a claim that will is 75:36 anti-semitism right well no it's not 75:41 we're just trying to honest to honestly 75:44 get to you know an understanding of what 75:47 is damaging our culture why is our 75:50 culture basically crumbling yeah you 75:54 don't thumb if you point out Freemasonry 75:56 in the British Empire work no one 75:58 accuses of hating British people yeah 76:00 exactly it's like it's like the the you 76:04 know if you look at like Palmerston and 76:07 you know the group that was creating 76:09 Zionism and the Irish potato famine the 76:12 Freemasons man 76:14 the British hated those people yeah the 76:16 British people saw the the masonic 76:18 control and the royal family is these 76:21 pommy ëletís who were basically only 76:25 kept you know in their positions of 76:27 power by by military force the people 76:32 gave them no legitimate authority 76:34 victoria that just you know cesspool of 76:39 a you know of a leader i mean i think 76:42 she was attempted to be assassinated 76:45 like something like 13 times during her 76:47 career you know the people hated her so 76:50 it wasn't an indictment when they again 76:53 its we're trying to understand the 76:55 schematic we want to know how it works 76:57 how it operates and I would like the 77:01 ones who want to go into this 77:03 anti-semitism stuff to actually stop and 77:06 think for a little bit particularly 77:07 Jewish people and and say wait a second 77:10 what if he's right right what can what 77:15 can we do to to expose because I think 77:20 that righteous Jewish people to use an 77:24 expression can be instrumental Tim in 77:28 helping us build the skin 77:30 because if it is I know organized as I 77:34 see it they would have much better 77:37 connections into some of these you know 77:40 ethnic centrical you know operations 77:45 right they owe these people they would 77:48 have they would they would be trusted 77:49 they would get information and they 77:50 would do a better job of exposing it so 77:52 I'm really disappointed that there isn't 77:55 more of this coming out of people who 77:59 are Jews and just like I'm very 78:01 disappointed in people who are masons I 78:04 was you know talking to someone who was 78:07 a freemason and he was saying yeah you 78:10 know we can kind of see to some extent 78:12 that up top you know there's and I said 78:14 well what the hell man you know your 78:17 responsibility is what to to the 78:20 humanity or to a few people who get you 78:23 to swear oaths right yeah when you evil 78:26 you've got to go after it and so I would 78:29 just say that to everyone I would say 78:31 that to the righteous Jews it's up to 78:33 you to get to to go after those people 78:36 who just because you have ethnic 78:38 relations if you see them in committing 78:41 evil you need to expose them to Mason's 78:44 who are in lower levels that you start 78:46 seeing that you know above theirs 78:48 mysterious evil you know swirling around 78:50 it's up to you to go and find out what 78:52 the hell it is yeah and to Europeans the 78:55 same thing right you know don't don't be 78:58 intimidated by fear of these you know 79:01 these groups that are powering the media 79:03 the fact they can throw a few names at 79:04 you what the hell this is an all 79:07 handwork part it's time for courage yeah 79:10 Jim well said well said well gee I think 79:13 we cover do you think the 77 I've got I 79:17 love that polyester look and I think we 79:19 put a good face on it we didn't talk 79:22 about jaws or Star Wars but okay listen 79:29 Joe listen yeah I'll talk to you later 79:30 we'll be in touch thank you so much 79:32 brother we will talk soon Joe the 79:34 weekend bye-bye 79:38 [Music] 80:13 the 80:15 [Music] 80:23 [Music] 80:35 [Music] 80:52 [Music] 81:13 you 81:16 [Music] 81:23 [Music]
End of transcription
- Return to top.
