Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood
File:Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood.jpg
Author John Piper and
Wayne Grudem eds.
Country United States
Language English
Genre Christianity
Publisher Crossway Books
Publication date
1st 1991; 2nd 2006
Media type Print (Paperback)
Pages 576
ISBN 978-1-58134-806-4 (2006)
OCLC 77531152
Preceded by Danvers Statement
What's the Difference?
Followed by Biblical Foundations for Manhood and Womanhood

Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood: A Response to Evangelical Feminism (or RBMW) is a collection of articles on gender roles, written from an evangelical perspective, and edited by John Piper and Wayne Grudem. Crossway Books published the book in 1991 for the Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood (CBMW). (CBMW, an international interdenominational evangelical Christian organisation, has a board and staff committed to a view of gender roles they dub complementarian.[1] Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood won Christianity Today's Book of the Year award in 1992.[2]

Summary

Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood presents its essays in five sections:

  1. Vision and Overview (2 essays)
  2. Exegetical and Theological Studies (12 essays)
  3. Studies from Related Disciplines (5 essays)
  4. Applications and Implications (6 essays)
  5. Conclusion and Prospect (1 essay)

It also contains two appendices — an essay by Wayne Grudem and the Danvers Statement, and a Prefatory essay by John Piper.

What's the Difference?

The first chapter of the book, "Manhood and Womanhood Defined According to the Bible" by Piper, had been published separately as What's the Difference? in 1990.[3] It has since been reprinted multiple times, and a DVD version and study guide for small groups are also available from Crossway.

See also

Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

References

  1. "If one word must be used to describe our position we prefer the term complementarian, since it suggests both equality and beneficial differences between men and women. We are uncomfortable with the term 'traditionalist' because it implies an unwillingness to let Scripture challenge traditional patterns of behaviour, and we certainly reject the term 'hierarchicalist' because it overemphasizes structured authority while giving no suggestion of equality or the beauty of mutual interdependence." Piper and Grudem, "Preface", in RBMW (1991): xiv.
  2. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  3. John Piper, "Manhood and Womanhood defined according to the Bible"

Further reading

  • Wayne Grudem (editor). Biblical Foundations for Manhood and Womanhood. Wheaton, Illinois: Crossway Books, 2002. [Essays from CBMW's 2000 conference]

External links