Revolt of Ghent (1539)

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search
File:View on Ghent, 1534.jpg
1534 painting of Ghent. Saint Bavo's Abbey in the foreground was destroyed on Charles' order after the revolt.

The Revolt of Ghent was an uprising by the citizens of Ghent against the regime of the Holy Roman Emperor and Spanish king Charles V in 1539. The revolt was a reaction to high taxes, which the Flemish felt were only used to fight wars abroad (in particular the Italian War of 1536–1538).[1] The rebels surrendered without a fight when Charles marched his army into the city the following year. Charles humiliated the rebels by parading their leaders in undershirts with hangman nooses around their necks. Since then Ghent citizens informally call themselves "noose bearers".[2]

Background

● Ghent
The image above contains clickable links
The European territories of Charles V.

At this time, Ghent was subject to the rule of the Holy Roman Emperor and Spanish king Charles V, though it was his sister, Mary of Hungary, who actually governed the region as his regent. Ghent and the Low Countries in general were an international center of trade and industry and therefore an important source of revenue. Ghent had a population of 40,000 to 50,000 people.[3]

In 1515, Charles imposed upon Ghent the Calfvel treaty, which, among other things, prevented the guilds from selecting their own deans.

In 1536, Charles went to war with the French king Francis I for control of northern Italy (the Italian War of 1536–1538). Charles asked Mary to raise money and conscripts from the Dutch provinces. In late March 1537, Mary declared a levy of 1.2 million guilders and an army of 30,000 conscripts along with munitions and artillery. Flanders would have to pay a third of this. Ghent was already deep in debt due to fines imposed by its rulers in the previous century.[4] Ghent also had lucrative commercial ties to France.[5]

Ghent refused to pay the taxes on the grounds that old pacts with previous rulers meant that no tax could be levied on Ghent without its consent, though they did offer to supply troops in lieu of money.[6] Mary tried haggling with Ghent's leaders, but Charles firmly insisted that Ghent pay its share without condition.[5]

Of the four Dutch provinces, Ghent was the only one to reject the new taxes.[7] When the other Dutch provinces refused to support Ghent, Ghent secretly offered its allegiance to the French king Francis I in exchange for protection from Charles. Francis rejected Ghent's petition because Charles had insinuated that he might give Francis control over Milan when he abdicated (this did not happen). Francis apparently thought Milan was more valuable than Ghent, and so rejected Ghent's petition.[5]

In early 1539, Ghent threw a lavish rhetorician festival. The lavishness of the festival infuriated Charles' officials because Ghent justified its refusal to pay taxes on the grounds that it couldn't afford to.[8]

In July 1539, rumors spread that certain aldermen had tampered with documents in the city's archives that legitimized Ghent's autonomy. In particular, the guilds were upset over the supposed theft of the Purchase of Flanders, a legendary document from a Flemish count which purportedly gave Ghent the right to reject all taxation. The guildsmen believed that their city's past and its rights had been altered and misrepresented.[9]

The revolt

On August 17, 1539, a number of guilds—which included the millers, the cordwainers, the old shoemakers, the smiths, and the shipmakers—demanded the right to choose their owns deans, which was forbidden by the Calfvel of 1515, and the arrest of the city's aldermen, who they believed had capitulated to Mary's demands against their wishes. Over the next few days, they armed themselves and took over the city, forcing the city's aldermen to flee or be imprisoned. On August 21 they formed a committee of nine men to administer the city's affairs.[6] A retired alderman by the name of Lieven Pyn was executed on August 28 in part for supposedly tampering with documents that legitimized Ghent's autonomy.[6] On September 3, the calfskin upon which the unpopular 1515 treaty was signed was ceremonially torn apart.

As a sign of his good intentions, Francis told Charles that Ghent had offered to defect to him. Seeing that the French king was cooperative, Charles decided it was time to suppress the revolt personally. He requested passage through French territory, which was granted. Charles did not want to sail to Flanders because he feared the English would try to capture him in the Channel. Charles set off from Spain with an entourage of about a hundred people.[5] Charles moved through France during the winter of 1539. He met with Francis at Loches on December 12, who escorted him to Paris.[10] Moving on, Charles reached Valenciennes in January, where he met with his sister Mary as well a delegation from Ghent. Charles warned them that he would make an example of Ghent.

Charles reached his Burgundian territories in late January. He met up with troops he had summoned from Germany, Spain, and the Netherlands.[5] Charles reached Ghent on February 14[11] with an army of around 5,000 soldiers.[12] The city offered him no resistance as he entered.

Aftermath

File:Charles V punishes the rebels of Ghent in 1540.gif
The humiliated rebel leaders beg Charles for mercy.

The leaders of the revolt were arrested, of whom 25 were executed. The rest were humiliated: on May 3, they were marched through the streets from the town hall towards Charles' palace, the Prinsenhof. The procession consisted of all the city's sheriffs, clerks, officials, and 30 noblemen dressed in black robes and barefoot; 318 guild members and 50 weavers, they too dressed in black robes; and the 50 day laborers dressed in white shirts with hangman's nooses around their necks.[13][14] The hangman's noose symbolized that they deserved the gallows. At the Prinsenhof, they were made to beg Charles and Mary for mercy.

A fine of 8,000 guilders was imposed on the city.[15] In late April, Charles decreed a new constitution, the Caroline Concession, that stripped Ghent of all its medieval legal and political freedoms, as well as all its weapons. The weavers and 53 other crafts guilds were merged into 21 corporations, and the privileges of all guilds save the shippers and butchers were stripped. The old abbey of Saint Bavo's and its church of the Holy Savior were demolished to make way for a new fortress, the Spanjaardenkasteel ("Spanish Castle), which housed a permanent garrison. Eight of the city's gates and parts of its walls were demolished. The city's aldermen would henceforth be selected by magistrates appointed by Charles' representatives.[16] Charles ordered the scaling back of festivals that fostered the city's civic pride.[17] The work clock in the belfry was taken down, because it was a symbol of political defiance as it had been used to summon assemblies of workers to the Vrijdagmarkt (the city's main square).[18]

Legacy

Since this incident the people of Ghent have taken on the sobriquet stropdragers ("noose bearers"). Every summer during the Ghent Festivities, the Guild of Noose Bearers commemorates the revolt by parading through the streets dressed in white shirts with nooses around their neck. The noose has also become an informal symbol of Ghent itself.

File:Stroppendragers.jpg
Reenactors marching during the annual Ghent Festival.
File:Gent RabotBlaisant 005.JPG
Statue of a noose bearer outside Charles' palace.

References

  1. Kamen (2005)
  2. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  3. OPSTAND IN OUDENAARDE IN 1539-1540 pg 28
  4. OPSTAND IN OUDENAARDE IN 1539-1540 pg 48
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 Robertson (1769)
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 Arnade (1996), p. 201
  7. Bercé (1987), p. 43
  8. Arnade (1996), p. 200
  9. Arnade (1996), p. 202
  10. Ward (1929), p. 74
  11. Sources disagree on the exact day Charles entered Ghent. Bercé and Robertson say it was on the 24th. Arnade (1996) says it was on the 4th, but in his 2008 book he says it was on the 14th. Koenigsberger and Web sources say it was on the 14th.
  12. Tilly (1996), p. 58
  13. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  14. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  15. OPSTAND IN OUDENAARDE IN 1539-1540 pg 81
  16. Arnade (1996), p. 263
  17. Arnade (2008), p. 150
  18. Arnade (1996), p. 206

Bibliography

  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

External links