Robert D. Hare

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search

Robert D. Hare, C.M. (born 1934 in Calgary, Alberta, Canada) is a researcher in the field of criminal psychology. He developed the Hare Psychopathy Checklist (PCL-Revised), used to assess cases of psychopathy. Hare advises the FBI's Child Abduction and Serial Murder Investigative Resources Center (CASMIRC) and consults for various British and North American prison services.

Hare received his Ph.D. in experimental psychology at University of Western Ontario (1963). He is professor emeritus of the University of British Columbia where his studies center on psychopathology and psychophysiology. He was invested as a Member of the Order of Canada on December 30, 2010.

Life and career

Hare's father was a roofing contractor and his mother was of French Canadian descent. He recalls that he 'coasted' through high school with average grades. He then attended the University of Alberta for a Bachelor of Arts degree which ended up 'more by default' with an emphasis on psychology. In 1960 he completed a Master of Arts in psychology at the same university. He then moved to the USA to study for a PhD program, but due to his daughter falling ill the family returned to Canada.[1] Hare then worked in the prison system in British Columbia for eight months, an area in which he had no particular qualification or training; indeed he would later recount in Without Conscience that some prisoners were able to manipulate him.[2] Hare then moved to Ontario where he completed his PhD with a dissertation on the effects of punishment on behaviour.[1] His research led him to The Mask of Sanity by American psychiatrist Hervey M. Cleckley, which played a pivotal role in the concept of psychopathy he applied and developed.[3]

Hare then returned to British Columbia, working at the university where he would stay for 30 years until retirement, and undertaking research at the same prison he had previously worked in. He concluded that the reason some prisoners seemed not to change their behavior in response to punishment was because they were psychopaths. He recalls “I happened to get into an area that nobody else was working in".[1] Hare has said that family and the loss of family (their daughter Cheryl died from multiple sclerosis in 2003) "defines an awful lot about who Averil and I are."[1][4] Averil, his wife, is a researcher and prominent social worker in Canada specializing in child abuse and child welfare.

In the 1970s he published Psychopathy: Theory and Research, summarizing the state of the field, and became internationally influential in reviving and shaping the concept.

Research

Etiology

Hare's research on the causes of psychopathy focused initially on whether such persons show abnormal patterns of anticipation or response (such as low levels of anxiety or high impulsiveness) to aversive stimuli ('punishments' such as mild but painful electric shocks) or pleasant stimuli ('rewards', such as a slide of a naked body). Further, following Cleckley, Hare investigated whether the fundamental underlying pathology is a semantic affective deficit - an inability to understand or experience the full emotional meaning of life events. While establishing a range of idiosyncrasies in linguistic and affective processing under certain conditions, the research program has not confirmed a common pathology of psychopathy. Hare's contention that the pathology is likely due in large part to an inherited or 'hard wired' deficit in cerebral brain function remains speculative.[5]

Hare has defined 'sociopathy' as a separate condition to psychopathy, as caused by growing up in an antisocial or criminal subculture rather than there being a basic lack of social emotion or moral reasoning. He has also regarded the DSM-IV diagnosis of Antisocial Personality Disorder as separate to his concept of psychopathy, as it did not list the same underlying personality traits. He suggests that ASPD would cover several times more people than psychopathy, and that while the prevalence of sociopathy is not known it would likely cover considerably more people than ASPD.[6]

Assessment tools

Frustrated by a lack of agreed definitions or rating systems of psychopathy, including at a ten-day international North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) conference in France in 1975, Hare began developing a Psychopathy Checklist. Produced for initial circulation in 1980, the same year that the DSM changed its diagnosis of sociopathic personality to Antisocial Personality Disorder, it was based largely on the list of traits advanced by Cleckley, with whom Hare corresponded over the years. Hare redrafted the checklist in 1985 following Cleckley's death in 1984, renaming it the Hare Psychopathy Checklist Revised (PCL-R). It was finalised as a first edition in 1991, when it was also made available to the criminal justice system, which Hare says he did despite concerns that it was not designed for use outside of controlled experimental research.[7] It was updated with extra data in a 2nd edition in 2003.

The PCL-R was reviewed in Buros Mental Measurements Yearbook (1995), as being the "state of the art" both clinically and in research use. In 2005, the Buros Mental Measurements Yearbook review listed the PCL-R as "a reliable and effective instrument for the measurement of psychopathy" and is considered the 'gold standard' for measurement of psychopathy. However, it is also criticised.[8]

Hare has accused the DSM's ASPD diagnosis of 'drifting' from clinical tradition, but his own checklist has been accused of in reality being closer to the concept of criminologists William and Joan McCord than that of Cleckley; Hare himself, while noting his promotion of Cleckley's work for four decades, has distanced himself somewhat from Cleckley's work.[9][10][11]

Hare is also co-author of derivatives of the PCL: the Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version (PCL:SV) (still requires a clinical interview and review of records by a trained clinician), the P-Scan (P for psychopathy, a screening questionnaire for non-clinicians to detect possible psychopathy), the Psychopathy Checklist: Youth Version (PCL:YV), and the Antisocial Process Screening Device (originally the Psychopathy Screening Device; a questionnaire for parents/staff to fill out on youth, or in a version developed by others, for youth to fill out as self-report).[12] Hare is also a co-author of the Guidelines for a Psychopathy Treatment Program. He has also co-developed the 'B-Scan' and more recently the "B-Scan 360" (B for business), questionnaires for people to rate psychopathy traits in others in the workplace.[13]

Hare was involved in a controversy in 2010 in which he threatened legal action if a peer-reviewed psychology article on the PCL was published that he claimed misrepresented his views. The paper eventually was published after a three-year delay.[14]

Impact

The Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised is sometimes used as a standard instrument for researchers and clinicians, especially in forensic settings such as prisons or high secure psychiatric units. The measures play an important role in recent risk-for-violence instruments. The PCL-R and PCL:SV have been found to be strong predictors of recidivism, violence and response to therapeutic intervention, though some studies have attributed this largely to the inclusion in the measure of past offending history.

The ability of Hare's concept of psychopathy to explain or predict crime has also been criticised, for example by Glenn Walters a long-serving US forensic clinical psychologist and Associate Professor of Criminal Justice.[15]

Popular science

Hare wrote a popular science bestseller published in 1993 entitled Without Conscience: The Disturbing World of the Psychopaths Among Us (reissued 1999). He describes psychopaths as 'social predators', while pointing out that most don't commit murder. One philosophical review described it as having a high moral tone yet tending towards sensationalism and graphic anecdotes, and as providing a useful summary of the assessment of psychopathy but ultimately avoiding the difficult questions regarding internal contradictions in the concept or how it should be classified.[16][17]

Hare also co-authored the bestselling Snakes in Suits: When Psychopaths Go to Work (2006) with organizational psychologist and human resources consultant Paul Babiak, is a portrayal of the disruptions caused when psychopaths enter the workplace. The book focuses on what Hare refers to as the "successful psychopath", who can be charming and socially skilled and therefore able to get by in the workplace. This is by contrast with the type of psychopath whose lack of social skills or self-control would cause them to rely on threats and coercion and who would probably not be able to hold down a job for long.

Hare appeared for several minutes in the 2003/4 award-winning documentary film The Corporation, discussing whether his criteria for psychopathy could be said to apply to modern business as a legal personality, appearing to conclude that many of them would apply by definition.[18] However in a 2007 edition of Snakes in Suits, Hare contends that the filmmakers took his remarks out of context and that he does not believe most corporations would meet all the necessary criteria in practice.[19]

Hare's views are recounted with some skepticism in the 2011 bestseller The Psychopath Test by British investigative journalist Jon Ronson, to which Hare has responded.[20][21]

See also

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Researchers: Hare - Area: Abnormal - Affiliation: University of British Columbia The Great Canadian Psychology Website, Joint initiative of Canadian Universities, 2005-2008
  2. Robert Hare: Early Experience Katherine Ramsland
  3. Awards - R.D. Hare Lifetime Achievement Award Society for the Scientific Study of Psychopathy
  4. Awards - Cheryl Wynne Hare Award Society for the Scientific Study of Psychopathy
  5. Patrick, Christopher J. (Editor) Handbook of Psychopathy (2005). Chapter 3: Other Theoretical Models of Psychopathy, Ronald Blackburn, Page 39
  6. Pg 19, Snakes in Suits
  7. Creator Of Psychopathy Test Worries About Its Use May 27, 2011
  8. The problem with Robert Hare's psychopathy checklist: incorrect conclusions, high risk of misuse, and lack of reliability. Med Law. 2008 Jun;27(2):449-62. Martens WH. PMID 18693491
  9. Thinking about Psychopaths and Psychopathy: Answers to Frequently Asked Questions "What are the differences between the psychopathy definitions designed by Hare and by Cleckley?" Editor: Ellsworth Lapham Fersch. iUniverse, 30 Oct 2006
  10. Handbook of Personology and Psychopathology Stephen Strack, John Wiley & Sons, 21 Jan 2005. Chapter 15: Psychopathy as a Personality Construct (Ronald Blackburn).
  11. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  12. Psychopathy Screening of Incarcerated Juveniles: A Comparison of Measures Daniel C. Murrie and Dewey G. Cornel. Psychological Assessment, 2002, Vol. 14, No. 4, 390 –396
  13. The psychopaths in suits
  14. Academic Battle Delays Publication by 3 Years
  15. The Trouble with Psychopathy as a General Theory of Crime Glenn D. Walters. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol April 2004 vol. 48 no. 2 133-148, doi 10.1177/0306624X03259472 PMID 15070462
  16. Review - Without Conscience: The Disturbing World of the Psychopaths Among Us by Robert D. Hare, Ph.D. Guilford Press, 1999 Review by Christian Perring, Ph.D. Metapsychology Online, Apr 25th 1999 (Volume 3, Issue 17)
  17. Without conscience: the disturbing world of the psychopaths among us Robert D. Hare, 1 Nov 1993
  18. The Corporation Transcripts and Extras - Hear more from... Hare.
  19. Babiak, Paul and Robert D. Hare (2007). Snakes in Suits: When Psychopaths Go to Work HarperCollins, ISBN 0061147893, p. 95, italics in original
  20. The Psychopath Test: A Journey Through the Madness Industry Jon Ronson (2011)
  21. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found. (2012)

External links