Robert Provan

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search

Robert James Provan (September 19, 1944 – July 6, 2006) was an attorney at law who practiced in Texas and is most noted for his bringing the first lawsuit of its kind in the United States against a health maintenance organization (HMO) on behalf of physician's using the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 that the Wall Street Journal said was poised to become a major test case[1] and whose rulings have been cited in other cases.

Early life and education

Provan was born on September 16, 1944 in Vernon, Texas, to James W. Provan Sr. and Alice Louise Provan (née Furr) who shortly after his birth moved to Chicago, Illinois. At the age of 5, Provan contracted polio, which left him paralyzed below the neck.[2] Provan graduated from Irving High School in Irving, Texas, then attended Slippery Rock University of Pennsylvania where he received his BS of Political Science. He then attended the University of Texas School of Law and received his Doctorage of Jurisprudence degree in December 1986. On December 19, 1974, Provan was admitted to the State Bar of Texas.[3][4][1][5]

Career

He served as an assistant attorney general for the State of Texas.[2]

Zamora-Quezada v. HealthTexas Medical Group

In 1996, Proven, while having lunch with attorneys from the Texas Medical Association, learned that doctor’s were being dropped from their HMO contracts because of their treating chronically ill patients, which the HMO's said was too expensive. Proven then proposed a never before used tactic against these HMO’s suggesting to these attorneys that they sue these HMO’s under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and posited: "Can you think of a more important relationship that a person with a disability has, than the one he has with his physician?"[1] With the backing of the Texas Medical Association, and a powerful group of private attorneys, Proven, in 1998, filed his first-of-a-kind lawsuit against five HMO’s under the ADA (Zamora-Quezada v. HealthTexas Medical Group, 34 F. Supp. 2d 433 (W.D. Tex. 1998))[6] on behalf of 10 HMO members who claimed the HMO's made it hard for them to see doctors. In 1999, these HMO's sought to dismiss Proven's lawsuit, but a federal court ruled against them, and the case was settled out of court. Many decisions relating to Proven’s unique lawsuit against these HMO’s have been cited in other court cases since.[7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]

See also

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  3. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  4. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  5. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  6. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  7. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  8. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  9. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  10. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  11. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  12. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  13. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  14. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  15. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

External links