# Roman numerals

(Redirected from Roman numeral)
Roman numerals on stern of a British clipper ship showing draft in feet. The numbers range from 13 to 22, from bottom to top.

The numeric system represented by Roman numerals originated in ancient Rome and remained the usual way of writing numbers throughout Europe well into the Late Middle Ages. Numbers in this system are represented by combinations of letters from the Latin alphabet. Roman numerals, as used today, are based on seven symbols:[1]

 Symbol Value I V X L C D M 1 5 10 50 100 500 1,000

The use of Roman numerals continued long after the decline of the Roman Empire. From the 14th century on, Roman numerals began to be replaced in most contexts by the more sophisticated Hindu-Arabic numerals; however, this process was gradual, and the use of Roman numerals persists in some minor applications to this day.

## Roman numeric system

The numbers 1 to 10 are usually expressed in Roman numerals as follows:

I, II, III, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII, IX, X.

The pattern continues across higher multiples. 10 through 90 are expressed as:

X, XX, XXX, XL, L, LX, LXX, LXXX, XC

while 100 through 900 are as follows:

C, CC, CCC, CD, D, DC, DCC, DCCC, CM

The basic pattern goes up to the low thousands, with M as the highest numeral:

M, MM, MMM

Numbers are formed by combining symbols and adding the values, so II is two (two ones) and XIII is thirteen (a ten and three ones). Symbols are placed from left to right in order of value, starting with the largest. Because each numeral has a fixed value rather than representing powers of ten by position, there is no need for place-keeping zeros, as in numbers like 207 or 1066; those numbers are written as CCVII (two hundreds, a five and two ones) and MLXVI (a thousand, a fifty, a ten, a five and a one). In other words, Roman numerals are built on an additive/subtractive system, in which powers of ten are 'built into' the symbols, rather than the more advanced place-value notation of hindu-arabic numerals.

In a few specific cases,[2] to avoid confusing and hard to read numbers with four characters repeated in succession (such as IIII or XXXX), subtractive notation is used:[3][4]

IV, IX, XL, XC, CD, CM
• I placed before V or X indicates one less, so four is IV (one less than five) and nine is IX (one less than ten)
• X placed before L or C indicates ten less, so forty is XL (ten less than fifty) and ninety is XC (ten less than a hundred)
• C placed before D or M indicates a hundred less, so four hundred is CD (a hundred less than five hundred) and nine hundred is CM (a hundred less than a thousand)[5]

For example, MCMIV is one thousand nine hundred and four, 1904 (M is a thousand, CM is nine hundred and IV is four).

Some examples of the modern use of Roman numerals include:

Thousands Hundreds Tens Units
1 M C X I
2 MM CC XX II
3 MMM CCC XXX III
4 CD XL IV
5 D L V
6 DC LX VI
7 DCC LXX VII
8 DCCC LXXX VIII
9 CM XC IX

### Standard form

The modern era has seen the emergence of a standardized orthography for Roman numerals, which permits only one permutation for any given value. This system may be described as a decimal pattern, as above, but also as a logical set of rules. While exceptions can be made (notably IIII instead of IV on clockfaces), the modern convention is widely recognized and adhered to, and may be prescribed by the following ruleset:[7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]

Basic Rules
1. Powers of ten are dealt with separately, ordered from greatest to smallest and from left to right, with numerals either added or subtracted.
2. Repeated 'tens' numerals (I, X, C, M) are added together, with up to three (3) permitted in sequence (subtraction allows an additional non-sequential repetition once per power).
3. 'Fives' numerals (V, L, D) may only be added once per power (not repeated nor subtracted).
4. Numerals placed to the right of a greater value are added, while those placed to the left are subtracted; if placed between two larger numerals, the 'tens' value is subtracted (i.e. subtraction takes precedence).
5. Only one (1) 'tens' numeral may be subtracted from a single numeral per power, and this must be by 1/5 or 1/10 (i.e. the next lower 'tens' numeral).
6. Addition must be less than subtraction for any given numeral (i.e. the added value to the right must be less than the subtractor).
7. Any subtracted 'tens' numeral must either be first, or be preceded by a numeral at least ten times (10x) greater.

The above describes the basic pattern of integers from 1 - 3,999.

Examples

Following the above rules:
90 must be XC. It cannot be LXXXX because that would break rule 2 (up to three in sequence), and it cannot be LXL because that would break rule 3 ('fives' not repeated).
45 must be XLV. It cannot be VL because that would break rule 3 ('fives' not subtracted).
99 must be XCIX. It cannot be IC because that would break rule 5 (subtract by one fifth or tenth).
18 must be XVIII. It cannot be IIXX or IXIX because these would break rule 5 (subtract once per power).
19 must be XIX. It cannot be IXX because that would break either rule 5 (subtract by one fifth or tenth) or rule 6 (subtract>add).
10 must be X. It cannot be IXI because that would break rule 6 (subtract>add).
14 must be XIV. It cannot be IXV because that would break rule 6 (subtract>add), and it cannot be VIX because that would break rule 7 (at least 10x).

1894 is MDCCCXCIV. Consider how this agrees with the rules: powers of ten are arranged properly (rule 1), C is used three times sequentially and a fourth time non-sequentially (rule 2), 'fives' numerals D and V are added once each (rule 3), X and I are subtracted by being placed to the left of larger values while the rest are added (rule 4), they are subtracted once per power by one tenth and one fifth respectively (rule 5), IV is less than X (rule 6), and C is 10x X and 100x I (rule 7).

Fractions & Vinculums

The following rules extend the system further:

• Fractions may only be added once to the right of all numerals (not subtracted), without redundancy, and are duodecimal.
• Beginning at 6/12, the S (semi) is used, followed by marks (unciae) for additional quantities up to 11/12.
• Placing a bar (vinculum) over a numeral multiplies it x1000.
• The vinculum is used for values of 4,000 and greater (it is not used up to 3,999), and may be iterated up to three (3) times.
• Starting at 4,000, and at the next two powers of a thousand thereafter, a new vinculum is added, with the pattern beginning at IV.
• Once vinculums are employed, the higher power is modified in preference to the lower (eg IV, not MV).
• Vinculums are always contiguous and are placed leftmost (ie no broken overlines or lower powers to the left per basic rule 1).

Thus, 2 2/3 would be rendered as IIS••, while 6,986 would be (VI)CMLXXXVI. Note that the symbol V is used more than once in that example, this is only permissible with the vinculum setting them apart. Also note that while M is used, 7,000 would be (VII).

(I), (II), and (III) are not used, with M, MM, MMM being preferred under 4,000. SS is never used in place of I (ss is sometimes seen as a variant of semi, but this is strictly pharmaceutical notation).

With fractions and vinculums employed, the lowest possible value is • or 1/12, while the highest is (((MMMCMXCIX)))((CMXCIX))(CMXCIX)CMXCIX or 3,999,999,999,999 (within standard usage). Four trillion, rendered as (((MMMM))), would be non-standard since it breaks basic rule 2, although the four M's can be used as a variant form, and it is more aesthetically pleasing as a maximum figure. Another alternative is ((((IV)))), but since the general principle is three sequential iterations, this should also apply to vinculums. The reason for the three-rule is that the eye can readily distinguish between one, two, or three marks, while four or greater become illegible. Thus, 4 M's are preferable as a variant form.

### Alternative forms

A typical clock face with Roman numerals in Bad Salzdetfurth, Germany

The standard form described above reflects typical modern usage rather than a universally accepted convention. Usage in ancient Rome varied greatly and remained inconsistent in medieval and modern times.[18]

• Roman inscriptions, especially in official contexts, sometimes use additive forms such as IIII and VIIII for 4 and 9 instead of (or even as well as) subtractive forms such as IV and IX. Both methods appear in documents from the Roman era, even within the same document.
• Double subtractives also occur, such as XIIX or even IIXX instead of XVIII for 18.
• Sometimes V and L are not used, with instances such as IIIIII and XXXXXX rather than VI or LX.[19][20]
An inscription on Admiralty Arch, London. The number is 1910, for which MCMX would be more usual.
• Clock faces that use Roman numerals normally show IIII for four o’clock but IX for nine o’clock, a practice that goes back to very early clocks such as the Wells Cathedral clock of the late 14th century.[21][22][23] However, this is far from universal: for example, the clock on the Palace of Westminster in London (aka "Big Ben") uses IV.[22]
• At the beginning of the 20th century, different representations of 900 (commonly CM) appeared in several inscribed dates. For instance, 1910 is shown on Admiralty Arch, London, as MDCCCCX rather than MCMX, while on the north entrance to the Saint Louis Art Museum, 1903 is inscribed as MDCDIII rather than MCMIII.[24]

## History

### Pre-Roman times and ancient Rome

Although Roman numerals came to be written with letters of the Roman alphabet, they were originally independent symbols. The Etruscans, for example, used 𐌠, 𐌡, 𐌢, , 𐌚, and for I, V, X, L, C, and M, of which only I and X happened to be letters in their alphabet.

#### Hypotheses about the origin of Roman numerals

##### Tally marks

One hypothesis is that the Etrusco-Roman numerals actually derive from notches on tally sticks, which continued to be used by Italian and Dalmatian shepherds into the 19th century.[25]

Thus, ⟨I⟩ descends not from the letter ⟨I⟩ but from a notch scored across the stick. Every fifth notch was double cut i.e. , , , , etc.), and every tenth was cross cut (X), IIIIΛIIIIXIIIIΛIIIIXII...), much like European tally marks today. This produced a positional system: Eight on a counting stick was eight tallies, IIIIΛIII, or the eighth of a longer series of tallies; either way, it could be abbreviated ΛIII (or VIII), as the existence of a Λ implies four prior notches. By extension, eighteen was the eighth tally after the first ten, which could be abbreviated X, and so was XΛIII. Likewise, number four on the stick was the I-notch that could be felt just before the cut of the Λ (V), so it could be written as either IIII or (IV). Thus the system was neither additive nor subtractive in its conception, but ordinal. When the tallies were transferred to writing, the marks were easily identified with the existing Roman letters I, V and X.

The tenth V or X along the stick received an extra stroke. Thus 50 was written variously as N, И, K, Ψ, , etc., but perhaps most often as a chicken-track shape like a superimposed V and I: . This had flattened to (an inverted T) by the time of Augustus, and soon thereafter became identified with the graphically similar letter L. Likewise, 100 was variously Ж, , , H, or as any of the symbols for 50 above plus an extra stroke. The form Ж (that is, a superimposed X and I like: 𐊌) came to predominate. It was written variously as >I< or ƆIC, was then abbreviated to Ɔ or C, with C variant finally winning out because, as a letter, it stood for centum, Latin for "hundred".

The hundredth V or X was marked with a box or circle. Thus 500 was like a Ɔ superimposed on a or , becoming D or Ð by the time of Augustus, under the graphic influence of the letter ⟨D⟩. It was later identified as the letter D; an alternative symbol for 'thousand' was (I) (or CIƆ or CꟾƆ), and half of a thousand or 'five hundred' is the right half of the symbol, I) (or or ꟾƆ), and this may have been converted into ⟨D⟩.[26] This at least was the etymology given to it later on.

Meanwhile, 1000 was a circled or boxed X: , , , and by Augustinian times was partially identified with the Greek letter Φ phi. Over time, the symbol changed to Ψ and . The latter symbol further evolved into , then , and eventually changed to M under the influence of the Latin word mille "thousand".

##### Hand signals

Alfred Hooper has an alternative hypothesis for the origin of the Roman numeral system, for small numbers.[27] Hooper contends that the digits are related to hand gestures for counting. For example, the numbers I, II, III, IIII correspond to the number of fingers held up for another to see. V, then represents that hand upright with fingers together and thumb apart. Numbers 6–10, are represented with two hands as follows (left hand, right hand) 6=(V,I), 7=(V,II), 8=(V,III), 9=(V,IIII), 10=(V,V) and X results from either crossing of the thumbs, or holding both hands up in a cross.

Another possibility is that each I represents a finger and V represents the thumb of one hand. This way the numbers between 1-10 can be counted on one hand using the order: I=P, II=PR, III=PRM, IV=IT, V=T, VI=TP, VII=TPR, VIII=TPRM, IX=IN, X=N (P=Pinky, R=Ring, M=Middle, I=Index, T=Thumb N=No Fingers/Other Hand). This pattern can also be continued using the other hand with the fingers representing X and the thumb L.

##### Intermediate symbols deriving from few original symbols

A third hypothesis about the origins states that the basic ciphers were I, X, C and Φ (or ) and that the intermediary ones were derived from taking half of those (half an X is V, half a C is L and half a Φ/⊕ is D).[28] The Φ was later replaced with M, the initial of Mille (the Latin word for 'thousand').

### Middle Ages and Renaissance

Minuscule (lower-case) letters were developed in the Middle Ages, well after the demise of the Western Roman Empire, and since that time lower-case versions of Roman numbers have also been commonly used: i, ii, iii, iv, and so on.

Since the Middle Ages, a j has sometimes been substituted for the final i of a lower-case Roman numeral, such as iij for 3 or vij for 7. This j can be considered a swash variant of i (see example [1]). The use of a final j is still used in medical prescriptions to prevent tampering with or misinterpretation of a number after it is written.[29][30]

Numerals in documents and inscriptions from the Middle Ages sometimes include additional symbols, which today are called 'medieval Roman numerals'. Some simply substitute another letter for the standard one (such as A for V, or Q for D), while others serve as abbreviations for compound numerals (O for XI, or F for XL). Although they are still listed today in some dictionaries, they are long out of use.[31]

Number Medieval
abbreviation
Notes and etymology
5 A Resembles an upside-down V. Also said to equal 500.
6 Ϛ Either from a ligature of VI, or the Greek numeral 6: stigma (Ϛ).[32]
7 S, Z Presumed abbreviation of septem, Latin for 7.
11 O Presumed abbreviation of onze, French for 11.
40 F Presumed abbreviation of English forty.
70 S Also could stand for 7, with the same derivation.
80 R
90 N Presumed abbreviation of nonaginta, Latin for 90. (N.B. N is also used for "nothing" (nullus)).
150 Y Possibly derived from the lowercase y's shape.
151 K Unusual, origin unknown; also said to stand for 250.[33]
160 T Possibly derived from Greek tetra, as 4 × 40 = 160.
200 H Could also stand for 2 (see also 𐆙, the symbol for the dupondius). From a barring of two I's.
250 E
300 B
400 P, G
500 Q Redundant with D, abbreviates quingenti, Latin for 500.
2000 Z

Chronograms, messages with dates encoded into them, were popular during the Renaissance era. The chronogram would be a phrase containing the letters I, V, X, L, C, D, and M. By putting these letters together, the reader would obtain a number, usually indicating a particular year.

### Modern use

By the 11th century, Hindu–Arabic numerals had been introduced into Europe from al-Andalus, by way of Arab traders and arithmetic treatises. Roman numerals, however, proved very persistent, remaining in common use in the West well into the 14th and 15th centuries, even in accounting and other business records (where the actual calculations would have been made using an abacus). Replacement by their more convenient Arabic equivalents was quite gradual, and Roman numerals are still used today in certain contexts. A few examples of their current use are:

Spanish Real using "IIII" instead of IV

#### Specific disciplines

Entrance to section LII (52) of the Colosseum, with numerals still visible

In astronomy, the natural satellites or moons of the planets are traditionally designated by capital Roman numerals appended to the planet’s name. For example, Titan's designation is Saturn VI.

In chemistry, Roman numerals are often used to denote the groups of the periodic table. They are also used in the IUPAC nomenclature of inorganic chemistry, for the oxidation number of cations which can take on several different positive charges. They are also used for naming phases of polymorphic crystals, such as ice.

In computing, Roman numerals may be used in identifiers which are limited to alphabetic characters by syntactic constraints of the programming language. In LaTeX, for instance, `\labelitemiii` refers to the label of an item in the third level iii of a nested list environment.

In military unit designation, Roman numerals are often used to distinguish between units at different levels. This reduces possible confusion, especially when viewing operational or strategic level maps. In particular, army corps are often numbered using Roman numerals (for example the American XVIII Airborne Corps or the WW2-era German III Panzerkorps) with Hindu-Arabic numerals being used for divisions and armies.

In music, Roman numerals are used in several contexts:

In pharmacy, Roman numerals are used in some contexts, including S to denote 'one half' and N to mean 'nothing'.[36] (See the sections below on zero and fractions.)

In photography, Roman numerals (with zero) are used to denote varying levels of brightness when using the Zone System.

In seismology, Roman numerals are used to designate degrees of the Mercalli intensity scale of earthquakes.

In tarot, Roman numerals (with zero) are used to denote the cards of the Major Arcana.

In theology and biblical scholarship, the Septuagint is often referred to as LXX, as this translation of the Old Testament into Greek is named for the legendary number of its translators (septuaginta being Latin for 'seventy').

In entomology, the broods of the thirteen and seventeen year periodical cicadas are identified by Roman numerals.

In advanced mathematics (including trigonometry, statistics, and calculus), when a graph includes negative numbers, its quadrants are named using I, II, III, and IV. These quadrant names signify positive numbers, negative numbers on the X axis, negative numbers on both axes, and negative numbers on the Y axis, respectively. The use of Roman numerals to designate quadrants avoids confusion, since Hindu-Arabic numerals are used for the actual data represented in the graph.

#### Modern non-English use

Capital or small capital Roman numerals are widely used in Romance languages to denote centuries, e.g. the French xviiie siècle[37] and the Spanish siglo XVIII mean '18th century'. Slavic languages in and adjacent to Russia similarly favour Roman numerals (XVIII век). On the other hand, in Slavic languages in Central Europe, like most Germanic languages, one writes '18.' (with a period) before the local word for 'century'.

Boris Yeltsin's signature, dated 10 November 1988. The month is specified by XI rather than 11.

In many European countries, mixed Roman and Hindu-Arabic numerals are used to record dates (especially in formal letters and official documents, but also on tombstones). The month is written in Roman numerals, while the day is in Hindu-Arabic numerals: 14.VI.1789 is 14 June 1789.

 I 9:00–17:00 II 10:00–19:00 III 9:00–17:00 IV 9:00–17:00 V 10:00–19:00 VI 9:00–13:00 VII —

In parts of Europe it is conventional to employ Roman numerals to represent the days of the week in hours-of-operation signs displayed in windows or on doors of businesses,[38] and also sometimes in railway and bus timetables. Monday, taken as the first day of the week, is represented by I. Sunday is represented by VII. The hours of operation signs are tables composed of two columns where the left column is the day of the week in Roman numerals and the right column is a range of hours of operation from starting time to closing time. In the sample chart (left), the business opens from 9 AM to 5 PM on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Thursdays; 10 AM to 7 PM on Tuesdays and Fridays; 9 AM to 1 PM on Saturdays; and is closed on Sundays.

Sign at km. 17·9 on route SS4 Salaria, north of Rome

In several European countries Roman numerals are used for floor numbering.[39][40] For instance, apartments in central Amsterdam are indicated as 138-III, with both a Hindu-Arabic numeral (number of the block or house) and a Roman numeral (floor number). The apartment on the ground floor is indicated as '138-huis'.

In Italy, where roads outside built-up areas have kilometre signs, major roads and motorways also mark 100-metre subdivisionals, using Roman numerals from I to IX for the smaller intervals. The sign IX | 17 thus marks kilometre 17.9.

A notable exception to the use of Roman numerals in Europe is in Greece, where Greek numerals (based on the Greek alphabet) are generally used in contexts where Roman numerals would be used elsewhere.

## Special values

### Zero

The number zero does not have its own Roman numeral, but the word nulla (the Latin word meaning 'none') was used by medieval scholars in lieu of 0. Dionysius Exiguus was known to use nulla alongside Roman numerals in 525.[41][42] About 725, Bede or one of his colleagues used the letter N, the initial of nulla or of nihil (the Latin word for 'nothing'), in a table of epacts, all written in Roman numerals.[43]

### Fractions

A triens coin (1/3 or 4/12 of an as). Note the four dots •••• indicating its value.
A semis coin (1/2 or 6/12 of an as). Note the S indicating its value.

Though the Romans used a decimal system for whole numbers, reflecting how they counted in Latin, they used a duodecimal system for fractions, because the divisibility of twelve (12 = 22 × 3) makes it easier to handle the common fractions of 1/3 and 1/4 than does a system based on ten (10 = 2 × 5). On coins, many of which had values that were duodecimal fractions of the unit as, they used a tally-like notational system based on twelfths and halves. A dot (•) indicated an uncia 'twelfth', the source of the English words inch and ounce; dots were repeated for fractions up to five twelfths. Six twelfths (one half) was abbreviated as the letter S for semis 'half'. Uncia dots were added to S for fractions from seven to eleven twelfths, just as tallies were added to V for whole numbers from six to nine.[44]

Each fraction from 1/12 to 12/12 had a name in Roman times; these corresponded to the names of the related coins:

Fraction Roman numeral Name (nominative and genitive) Meaning
1/12 Uncia, unciae Ounce
2/12 = 1/6 •• or : Sextans, sextantis Sixth
4/12 = 1/3 •••• or :: Triens, trientis Third
5/12 ••••• or :·: Quincunx, quincuncis Five-ounce (quinque unciaequincunx)
6/12 = 1/2 S Semis, semissis Half
7/12 S• Septunx, septuncis Seven-ounce (septem unciaeseptunx)
8/12 = 2/3 S•• or S: Bes, bessis Twice (as in twice a third)
9/12 = 3/4 S••• or S Dodrans, dodrantis
or nonuncium, nonuncii
or ninth ounce (nona uncianonuncium)
10/12 = 5/6 S•••• or S:: Dextans
or
decunx, decuncis
Less a sixth (de-sextansdextans)
or ten ounces (decem unciaedecunx)
11/12 S••••• or S:·: Deunx Less an ounce (de-unciadeunx)
12/12 = 1 I As, assis Unit

The arrangement of the dots was variable and not necessarily linear. Five dots arranged like (⁙) (as on the face of a die) are known as a quincunx, from the name of the Roman fraction/coin. The Latin words sextans and quadrans are the source of the English words sextant and quadrant.

Other Roman fractional notations included the following:

• 1/8 sescuncia, sescunciae (from sesqui- + uncia, i.e. 1½ uncias), represented by a sequence of the symbols for the semuncia and the uncia.
• 1/24 semuncia, semunciae (from semi- + uncia, i.e. ½ uncia), represented by several variant glyphs deriving from the shape of the Greek letter Sigma (Σ), one variant resembling the pound sign (£) without the horizontal line(s) and another resembling the Cyrillic letter Є.
• 1/36 binae sextulae, binarum sextularum (two sextulas) or duella, duellae, represented by a sequence of two reversed Ss (ƧƧ).
• 1/48 sicilicus, sicilici, represented by a reversed C (Ɔ).
• 1/72 sextula, sextulae (1/6 of an uncia), represented by a reversed S (Ƨ).
• 1/144 = 12−2 dimidia sextula, dimidiae sextulae (half a sextula), represented by a reversed S crossed by a horizontal line (𐆔).
• 1/288 scripulum, scripuli (a scruple), represented by the symbol ℈.
• 1/1728 = 12−3 siliqua, siliquae, represented by a symbol resembling closing guillemets (𐆕).

### Large numbers

A number of systems were developed for the expression of larger numbers that cannot be conveniently expressed using the normal seven letter symbols of conventional Roman numerals.

#### Apostrophus

One of these was the apostrophus,[45] in which 500 (usually written as D) was written as |Ɔ, while 1,000 was written as C|Ɔ instead of M.[26] This is a system of encasing numbers to denote thousands (the Cs and Ɔs functioned in this case as the Roman equivalent of parentheses), and has its origins in Etruscan numeral usage. The D and M used to represent 500 and 1,000 in conventional Roman numerals were probably derived from |Ɔ and C|Ɔ, respectively.

1630 on the Westerkerk in Amsterdam, with the date expressed in apostrophus notation.

In this system, an extra |Ɔ denoted 500, |ƆƆ 5,000 and |ƆƆƆ 50,000. For example:

Base number with |Ɔ with |ƆƆ with |ƆƆƆ C|Ɔ = 1,000 CC|ƆƆ = 10,000 CCC|ƆƆƆ = 100,000 |Ɔ = 500 C|Ɔ|Ɔ = 1,500 CC|ƆƆ|Ɔ = 10,500 CCC|ƆƆƆ|Ɔ = 100,500 |ƆƆ = 5,000 CC|ƆƆ|ƆƆ = 15,000 CCC|ƆƆƆ|ƆƆ = 105,000 |ƆƆƆ = 50,000 CCC|ƆƆƆ|ƆƆƆ = 150,000

Sometimes C|Ɔ was reduced to ↀ for 1,000. John Wallis is often credited for introducing the symbol for infinity (modern ∞), and one conjecture is that he based it on this usage, since 1,000 was hyperbolically used to represent very large numbers. Similarly, |ƆƆ for 5,000 was reduced to ↁ; CC|ƆƆ for 10,000 to ↂ; |ƆƆƆ for 50,000 to ↇ; and CCC|ƆƆƆ for 100,000 to ↈ.[25]

Page from a 16th-century manual, showing a mixture of apostrophus and vinculum numbers (see in particular the ways of writing 10,000).

#### Vinculum

Another system is the vinculum, where a conventional Roman numeral is multiplied by 1,000 by adding an overline.[25] For instance:

• IV for 4,000
• XXV for 25,000

Adding further vertical lines before and after the numeral might also be used to raise the multiplier to (say) one hundred thousand, or a million. thus:

• |VIII| for 800,000
• |XX| for 2,000,000

This needs to be distinguished from the custom of adding both underline and overline to a Roman numeral, simply to make it clear that it is in fact a number, e.g. MCMLXVII.

## References

1. Gordon, Arthur E. (1982). Illustrated Introduction to Latin Epigraphy. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN 0520050797. Alphabetic symbols for larger numbers, such as Q for 500,000, have also been used to various degrees of standardization.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
2. Reddy, Indra K.; Khan, Mansoor A. (2003). Essential Math and Calculations for Pharmacy Technicians. CRC Press.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
3. Dela Cruz, M. L. P.; Torres, H. D. (2009). Number Smart Quest for Mastery: Teacher's Edition. Rex Bookstore, Inc.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
4. Martelli, Alex; Ascher, David (2002). Python Cookbook. O'Reilly Media Inc.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
5. Stroh, Michael. Trick question: How to spell 1999? Numerals: Maybe the Roman Empire fell because their computers couldn't handle calculations in Latin. The Baltimore Sun, December 27, 1998.
6. Hayes, David P. "Guide to Roman Numerals". Copyright Registration and Renewal Information Chart and Web Site.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
7. Seitz, Lee K. (December 8, 1999). "LURNC: How Roman Numerals Work". home.hiwaay.net. Retrieved May 24, 2020.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
8. Shaw, Allen A. (December 1938). "Note on Roman Numerals". National Mathematics Magazine. Taylor & Francis, Ltd. on behalf of the Mathematical Association of America. 13 (3): 127–128. doi:10.2307/3028752. Retrieved November 27, 2018.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
9. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41185784
11. Reddy, Indra K.; Khan, Mansoor A. (2003). Essential Math and Calculations for Pharmacy Technicians. CRC Press. ISBN 978-0-203-49534-6.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
12. Morandi, Patrick. "Roman Numerals". nmsu.edu. New Mexico State University. Retrieved November 20, 2018.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
13. "Math Forum: Ask Dr. Math FAQ: Roman Numerals". Mathforum.org. The Math Forum at NCTM. 1994–2018. Retrieved November 21, 2018.CS1 maint: date format (link)<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
14. Lewis, Paul (October 4, 2005). "ROMAN NUMERALS: How They Work". clarahost.co.uk. Retrieved December 8, 2018. Version 3.11<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
15. "Roman Numerals". factmonster.com. FactMonster Staff. February 21, 2017. Retrieved July 29, 2020.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
16. "Roman Numerals: Educational Articles". us.edugain.com. Edugain USA. July 2, 2016. Retrieved August 3, 2020.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
17. https://www.mytecbits.com/tools/mathematics/roman-numerals-converter
18. Adams, Cecil (February 23, 1990). "What is the proper way to style Roman numerals for the 1990s?". The Straight Dope.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
19. Reynolds, Joyce Maire; Spawforth, Anthony J. S. (1996). "numbers, Roman". In Hornblower, Simon; Spawforth, Anthony (eds.). Oxford Classical Dictionary (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-866172-X.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
20. Kennedy, Benjamin Hall (1923). The Revised Latin Primer. London: Longmans, Green & Co.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
21. Milham, W.I. (1947). Time & Timekeepers. New York: Macmillan. p. 196.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
22. Pickover, Clifford A. (2003), Wonders of Numbers: Adventures in Mathematics, Mind, and Meaning, Oxford University Press, p. 282, ISBN 9780195348002<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>.
23. Adams, Cecil; Zotti, Ed (1988). More of the straight dope. Ballantine Books. p. 154. ISBN 9780345351456.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>.
24. "Gallery: Museum's North Entrance (1910)". Saint Louis Art Museum. Retrieved January 10, 2014. The inscription over the North Entrance to the Museum reads: "Dedicated to Art and Free to All · MDCDIII". These Roman numerals translate to 1903, indicating that the engraving was part of the original building designed for the 1904 World's Fair.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
25. Ifrah, Georges (2000). The Universal History of Numbers: From Prehistory to the Invention of the Computer. Translated by David Bellos, E. F. Harding, Sophie Wood, Ian Monk. John Wiley & Sons.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
26. Asimov, Isaac (1977) [1966]. Asimov On Numbers. Pocket Books, a division of Simon & Schuster, Inc. p. 9.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
27. Alfred Hooper. The River Mathematics (New York, H. Holt, 1945).
28. Keyser, Paul (1988). "The Origin of the Latin Numerals 1 to 1000". American Journal of Archaeology. 92: 529–546. JSTOR 505248.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
29. Sturmer, Julius W. Course in Pharmaceutical and Chemical Arithmetic, 3rd ed. (LaFayette, IN: Burt-Terry-Wilson, 1906). p25 Retrieved on 2010-03-15.
30. Bastedo, Walter A. Materia Medica: Pharmacology, Therapeutics and Prescription Writing for Students and Practitioners, 2nd ed. (Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders, 1919) p582 Retrieved on 2010-03-15.
31. Capelli, A. Dictionary of Latin Abbreviations. 1912.
32. Perry, David J. Proposal to Add Additional Ancient Roman Characters to UCS.
33. Bang, Jørgen. Fremmedordbog, Berlingske Ordbøger, 1962 (Danish)
34. Owen, Rob (January 13, 2012). "TV Q&A: ABC News, 'Storage Wars' and 'The Big Bang Theory'". Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. Retrieved January 13, 2012.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
35. NFL won't use Roman numerals for Super Bowl 50, nfl.com, Retrieved November 5, 2014
36. Bachenheimer, Bonnie S. (2010). Manual for Pharmacy Technicians. ISBN 158528307X.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
37. Lexique des règles typographiques en usage à l'imprimerie nationale (in French) (6th ed.). Paris: Imprimerie nationale. March 2011. p. 126. ISBN 978-2-7433-0482-9.CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles> On composera en chiffres romains petites capitales les nombres concernant : ↲ 1. Les siècles.
38. Beginners latin, Nationalarchives.gov.uk, Retrieved December 1, 2013
39. Roman Arithmetic, Southwestern Adventist University, Retrieved December 1, 2013
40. Roman Numerals History, Retrieved December 1, 2013
41. Faith Wallis, trans. Bede: The Reckoning of Time (725), Liverpool: Liverpool Univ. Pr., 2004. ISBN 0-85323-693-3.
42. Byrhtferth's Enchiridion (1016). Edited by Peter S. Baker and Michael Lapidge. Early English Text Society 1995. ISBN 978-0-19-722416-8.
43. C. W. Jones, ed., Opera Didascalica, vol. 123C in Corpus Christianorum, Series Latina.
44. Maher, David W.; Makowski, John F., "Literary Evidence for Roman Arithmetic with Fractions", Classical Philology 96 (2011): 376–399.
45. "Merriam-Webster Unabridged Dictionary".<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>

## Sources

• Menninger, Karl (1992). Number Words and Number Symbols: A Cultural History of Numbers. Dover Publications. ISBN 978-0-486-27096-8.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>