Shari Karney

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search

Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found. Shari Karney (born February 2, 1954) is an American attorney, incest-survivor activist, and bar exam review company owner.

Early life and education

Shari grew up in Southern California. She graduated with a B.A. from University of California Los Angeles then went to law school and graduated with her J.D. from Loyola Law School in Los Angeles.

Discovering repressed incest

While practicing as an attorney in 1983, Shari was asked by a mother to take on a child custody case where the mother thought her 3-year-old daughter was being sexually abused by her ex-husband.[1] While she was questioning the ex-husband on the stand during cross-examination regarding the incest she began to scream and yell and lose control without understanding why. As the witness talked, Shari has claimed she became nauseated and sweaty. She has claimed that she kept hearing the sound of typing in the back of the courtroom, but no one was there. When the witness gave an excuse for touching his daughter's genitals, she screamed, "These men just get away with it!" and leapt into the witness box and tried to strangle him.[2][3] The judge cited her for contempt, sent her to jail for two days and ordered her into therapy. It was in therapy that she has claimed that she remembered her own childhood molestation by her brother and her father, who was a writer.[2] Shari's brother and father have denied her allegations.[4] Nevertheless, she vowed to help other alleged incest victims fight their abusers in court.[2]

Incest survivor activism

Shari began taking incest survivor cases helping the victims sue their families in civil court to win legal compensation in order to be reimbursed for therapy and other costs.[5] When victims couldn't pay, Shari would finance the suits herself with income from her bar review course, Barwinners.[5] However, Shari found it difficult to win these cases when the courts had a statute of limitations on victims of one year from their 18th birthday to sue.[6] One problem is that incest survivors often were too young at 19 years old to have the means to bring suit. Also, some survivors, like Shari, had repressed the painful memories and did not remember them until they were older and the statute of limitations had run out. She decided she would have to change the law in order to get justice for these victims.

Senate Bill 108

From 1985 until 1991 Shari, along with San Francisco attorney Mary R. Williams and California State Senator Bill Lockyer fought for passage of Senate Bill 108. During the Senate hearings, Shari testified to her own molestation by her father and brother.[1] The California law, which amended California Civil Code section 340.1[7] and took effect Jan. 1, 1991 permits "delayed discovery" of childhood sexual abuse decades after that abuse has occurred.[1] Under the new law the statute of limitations age has been raised to 26 years old. After age 26, a "delayed discovery" provision allows a person who has suppressed their emotional trauma to sue within three years of discovering the abuse.[1] For example, a middle-aged person can now sue his or her elderly parent for sexual trauma caused at age 4, in the same manner as victims of other delayed-discovery injuries, such as asbestos poisoning.[1] Six other states have also passed similar laws.[1]

Opposition

Opponents of SB 108 included California Defense Council, an association of defense lawyers, many of whom are employed by insurers because an abuser's legal fees and some settlement costs would most likely be covered by homeowner insurance policies since most incest occurs in the home.[8] School districts also opposed SB 108 since the bill broadened liability to molesters not related to the victim.[8]

Some psychologists and therapists of incest survivors see lawsuits as a last resort or capable of causing more damage because it cuts the victim off from the family or because the experience may even compound the victimization based on the difficult burden of proof in a court of law,[6] and the often brutal experience of cross-examination by defense lawyers.[9]

Shattered Trust: The Shari Karney Story

In 1991, NBC bought the rights to her story and developed a movie called Shattered Trust: The Shari Karney Story.[10] The movie was released in 1993 as a television film directed by Bill Corcoran and starring Melissa Gilbert as Shari Karney.[11] The film garnered generally positive reviews.

Television appearances

In 1991 Shari appeared on The Oprah Winfrey Show, Geraldo, Today, Home Show, Larry King Live, and ABC Primetime television programs to educate members of the public about their new legal rights under SB 108.[4]

From 2000-2001 Shari also appeared on the American syndicated TV "court show" Power of Attorney as one of the rotating high profile attorneys.[12]

Barwinners

Today, Shari owns and operates her bar exam review company, Barwinners — formerly called the "Karney Writing Course."[13] Barwinners is a company in California that offers a preparation course in the six major areas covered on the Multistate Bar Examination (MBE) along with additional lectures on the specific law of the state, specializing in the California Bar Examination, repeat bar exam takers, and personalized attention.[12] She started the company 28 years ago to supplement her income while trying the incest survivor cases but it has developed into her main source of income when she stopped practicing in order to educate attorneys and the public about their rights under SB 108.[10]

On July 29, 2015, Barwinners agreed to pay $130,000 in fines and restitution for false advertising to settle a lawsuit filed by the Santa Monica City Attorney and Los Angeles District Attorney, in response to consumer complaints that the company's bar passage rate, advertised on the company's website as 94% for first time takers and 86-87% for repeaters was actually much lower than advertised. Prosecutors found that the actual bar passage rate for the clients of Barwinners was between 38% and 63%. As part of the settlement, Barwinners is also enjoined from making the rate passage claim in their advertising, and must provide scholarships to low income students. [14][15]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  3. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  4. 4.0 4.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  5. 5.0 5.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  6. 6.0 6.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  7. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  8. 8.0 8.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  9. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  10. 10.0 10.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  11. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0108110/combined
  12. 12.0 12.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  13. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  14. http://www.latimes.com/local/education/la-me-bar-suit-20150729-story.html
  15. http://www.smgov.net/Main/News_Tab/Bar_Exam_Prep_Company_%E2%80%9CBarwinners%E2%80%9D_Enjoined_and_Pays_$130,000_In_Restitution_And_Fines_For_False_Advertising.aspx