Battle of Buda (1686)

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
(Redirected from Siege of Buda (1686))
Jump to: navigation, search

Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

The Battle of Buda (1686) was fought between the Holy League and the Ottoman Empire, as part of the follow-up campaign in Hungary after the Battle of Vienna. The Holy League took Buda after a long siege.

Background

In 1541 Buda was conquered by the Turks in the Siege of Buda, and was under Ottoman rule for the next 145 years. Following the Ottoman defeat at the Battle of Vienna in 1683, Holy Roman Emperor Leopold I saw the opportunity for a counterstrike. After the unsuccessful second siege of Vienna by the Turks in 1683, which started the Great Turkish War, an imperial counteroffensive started for the re-conquest of Hungary, so that the Hungarian capital Buda could be freed from the Ottomans. With the aid of Pope Innocent XI, the Holy League was formed on 5 March 1684, with King Jan Sobieski of Poland, Emperor Leopold I and the Republic of Venice agreeing to an alliance against the Turks. Buda was besieged for 108 days and ended in Ottoman victory.

Siege

File:Fireworks in brussel 1686 in conmemoration of the liberation of hungary.jpg
Fireworks in Brussels in commemoration of the recapture of Buda from the Turks in 1686

In 1686, two years after the unsuccessful siege of Buda, a renewed campaign was started to take the city. This time the Holy League's army was much larger, consisting of 65,000-100,000 men,[1] including German, Hungarian, Croat, Dutch, English, Spanish, Czech, Italian, French, Burgundian, Danish and Swedish soldiers, and other Europeans as volunteers, artillerymen and officers. The Turkish defenders consisted of 7,000 men.

By the middle of June 1686 the siege had begun. On July 27 the Holy League's army started a large-scale attack, which was repulsed with a loss of 5,000 men. A Turkish relief army arrived at Buda in the middle of August led by Grand Vizier Sarı Süleyman Paşa, but the besieged Ottoman forces, led by commander Abdurrahman Abdi Arnavut Pasha, was unable to mount any offensive and he was shortly afterwards killed in action. Abdi Pasha's defensive efforts are referred to as "heroic" by Tony Jaques in his book "The Dictionary of Battles and Sieges".[2]

Prince Eugene of Savoy and his dragoons were not directly involved in entering the city but secured the rear of their army against the Turkish relief army, which could not prevent the city from being entered after 143 years in Turkish possession.

Massacre of Jews and Muslims

After the conquest, the victorious soldiers took out their fury on the hated "heathens". Knowledge of the Turkish threat was firmly embodied in the consciousness of Europe at that time, fueled by reports of Turkish atrocities against civilians and the religious attitudes of the Christian church:

"Buda was taken and abandoned to plundering. The soldiers committed thereby such excesses. Against the Turks, because of their long and persistent resistance, which had cost an amazing quantity of its comrades their lives, they spared neither age nor sex. The Elector of Bavaria and the Duke of Lorraine, disturbed by knowing of men killed, and women raped, gave good orders that the butchery must stop, and the lives of over 2000 Turks were saved."

Over 3,000 Turks were killed in the slaughter perpetrated by imperial troops, and the violence was directed not only against the Muslims, but likewise against the Jewish population of Buda.[3] As subjects of the Ottoman Empire, who enjoyed greater tolerance under the Ottomans compared to the Habsburgs,[4] the Jews had fought side-by-side with the Turks[5] and were considered their allies.[4] After the conquest of the city, the Jewish community of Buda, which at its height had numbered 3,000 persons,[6] was almost completely destroyed.[4][7] Approximately half of the city's 1,000 Jews were massacred;[8] hundreds of Jews and 6,000 Muslims were captured to be sold as slaves or held for ransom[8][9] as a "punishment" for their loyalty to the Ottoman Turks.[8][10] The homes and properties of the Jews were looted and destroyed.[10] The Reformation Hungarian Protestants advocated the complete removal of the Jewish population of Hungary.[10] Most of the Jews remaining in Buda,[7] as well as most of those in the rest of Hungary, left with the retreating Turks.[7][11] The captured ones were sent to Vienna, Pozsony or Mikulov.[4] The mosques and minarets of Buda were destroyed and three synagogues were burned, along with numerous valuable books, by the Army of the Holy Roman Empire.[8]

The bloodiest events of the battle have been recorded by Johann Dietz of Brandenburg, an army doctor in the besieging army:

" . . . Not even the babies in their mother's wombs were spared. All were sent to their deaths. I was quite horrified by what was done here. Men were far more cruel to each other than wild beasts (Bestien)."[12]

The imperial troops buried their own dead and threw the dead bodies of the Turks and Jews into the Danube.[5]

Consequences

The economic decline of the city during the Ottoman conquest characterized by the stagnation of population--the population of Buda was not larger in 1686 than it was two centuries earlier in the 15th century.[13] The Ottomans allowed the Hungarian royal palace to fall into ruins.[14] The amortized palace was later transformed into a gunpowder storage and magazine by the Ottomans,[15] which caused its detonation during the siege in 1686. The original Christian Hungarian population didn't feel secure during the Ottoman conquest; their numbers significantly shrank over the next decades due to their fleeing to Habsburg-ruled Royal Hungary. Jewish and Gypsy immigrants became dominant during Ottoman rule.[16] It became an Ottoman cultural and commercial center. Some of the churches in the city were rebuilt as mosques rather than being destroyed. Churches, mosques, schools, communal kitchens, bakeries and Turkish baths were built.

As a consequence of the recapture of Buda from the Turks, as well as the victory in the Battle of Mohács (1687), the Hungarian parliament recognized at Pressburg in November 1687 that the inheritance of the Hungarian crown had passed to the Habsburgs, without the right to object as well as resist. In addition, the Hungarian parliament committed itself to crown the Habsburg successor to the throne still during his father's lifetime as king of Hungary. Thus on 9 December 1687 Joseph, the nine-year-old son of emperor Leopold, was crowned as a first hereditary king with the Stephanskrone crown. Hungary was a hereditary country of the Habsburgs and already in June 1688 the "commission for the mechanism of the Kingdom of Hungary" was now finally created, in order to create in the country of the Stephanskrone a strong monarchistic government.

References

  1. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named Young
  2. http://books.google.com.pk/books?id=3amnMPTPP5MC&pg=PR38&dq=battle+of+buda+1686&hl=en&sa=X&ei=m4efUO-QJcr7rAfC74D4CA&ved=0CEQQ6AEwCA#v=onepage&q=buda&f=false
  3. Jewish Budapest: Memories, Rites, History, by Kinga Frojimovics, Géza Komoróczy, 1999, p.504-505
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named East-Central_Europe_1700.2C_p.89
  5. 5.0 5.1 The Dutch Intersection: The Jews and the Netherlands in Modern History, by Yosef Kaplan, 2008, p.214
  6. The Myth of the Jewish Race, by Raphael Patai, Jennifer Patai, 1989, p.47
  7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 A Travel Guide to Jewish Europe, Ben G. Frank, 2001, p.532
  8. 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 The Holocaust and the Book: Destruction and Preservation, by Jonathan Rose, 2008, p.268-270
  9. Frommer's Budapest and the Best of Hungary, by Ryan James, 2010, p.174
  10. 10.0 10.1 10.2 Masked Ball at the White Cross Café: the failure of Jewish assimilation, by Janet Elizabeth Kerekes, 2005, p.24-25
  11. Christianity and the Holocaust of Hungarian Jewry, by Moshe Y. Herczl, Charles Darwin, 1995, p.4-5
  12. Jewish Budapest: Memories, Rites, History, by Kinga Frojimovics, Géza Komoróczy, 1999, p.505
  13. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  14. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  15. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  16. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.