Spongiophyton

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search
Spongiophyton
Temporal range: Early Devonian – Middle Devonian[1]
Scientific classification e
Kingdom: Plantae
Phylum: incertae sedis
Family: Spongiophytaceae
Genus: †Spongiophyton
Kräusel, 1954
Species
  • S. hirsutum
  • S. lenticulare Kräusel, 1954(type)
  • S. minutissimum Kräusel, 1954
  • S. nanum emend Chaloner et al, 1974

Lua error in Module:Taxonbar/candidate at line 22: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).

Spongiophyton was a thallose fossil of the early to mid Devonian, which is notoriously difficult to classify.

Spongiophyton displayed dichotomous branching, and a flattened/elliptical cross section with a thick (20–80 μm) upper cuticular surface.[2] It is also perforated with pores resembling those of some liverworts.[2] It probably grew on the banks of rivers.[3] Spongiophyton has been mistakenly interpreted as tree resin[4] and lycopod cuticle,[5] and was later identified as the cuticle of a thalloid plant.[6] It has most recently been interpreted on morphological[7] and isotopic[8] grounds as a lichen - which would make it the earliest known representative of this group.[9]

The significance of the isotopic data has, however, been called into question. Jahren et al. argued that mosses and liverworts had a δ13C signature of under −26‰, and lichens were exclusively > −26‰. But in deducing this they relied solely on their own data, neglecting to include published datasets or bryophytes from a wide range of habitats. They also failed to take into account any adjustment necessary to overcome post-burial alteration of the δ13C, or to compensate for the different isotopic composition of the early Devonian atmosphere.[2] Repeating Jahren's experiments with these factors taken into account shows that most major groups' δ13C values overlap significantly, and do not provide a statistically significant case for the inclusion of Spongiophyton in any group.[2]

Notes

  1. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 Fletcher (2004)
  3. Gensel et al.. 1991; Griffing et al. 2000; in Fletcher (2004)
  4. Penhallow (1889) in Fletcher (2004)
  5. Barbosa (1949) in Fletcher (2004)
  6. Kräusel (1954) in Fletcher (2004)
  7. Taylor et al. (2004)
  8. Jahren et al. (2003)
  9. Retallack (1994) suggested that the Ediacaran biota were lichens, but has since refined this hypothesis (Retallack, 2007).

References

  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.