State serf

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search

Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

State serfs were a special class in 18th-19th century Russia, the number of which in some periods reached half of the agricultural population. In contrast to private Russian serfs, state serfs were considered personally free, although attached to the land.

History

The state peasants were created by decrees of Peter I and applied to the agricultural population: various peasant classes, single homesteaders (servant people on the border area adjoining the wild steppe), the non-Russian peoples of the Volga, and the Ural regions.

The number of state peasants increased due to several factors: the confiscation of church lands (huge estates of the Russian Orthodox Church by Catherine II), additional conquered territories (the Baltic States, the Right-Bank Ukraine, Belarus, Crimea, the Caucasus), and the former serfs of the confiscated estates of the gentry of the Commonwealth, among others. Many of these state peasants replenished runaway private serfs and allowed peasants to re-settle on the developed but un-tended lands (Bashkiria, New Russia, North Caucasus, etc.). This process (transition of land previously tended runaway serfs to the category of state-serf tended land) implicitly encouraged the imperial power.[1] In the second half of the 18th century, the government handed out to the nobility hundreds of thousands of state peasants, practiced mass sale of state-owned estates, transferring them into specific state departments, and converted many state peasants to the position of military settlers in the western provinces (a deposit for rent landlords). Additionally from the nobility came suggestions to eliminate the estate of state peasants, requesting the passage of the state-owned land to private hands. Nevertheless, the relative number of state peasants grew. At the time of the first census in 1724 the state peasants accounted for 19% of the population, and by the last census in 1858 they accounted for 45% of the population in the same territory [2].

Position

State peasants lived on public land and paid taxes to the treasury. According to the first audit of the tax paying population of Russia (1719), there were in European Russia and Siberia 1,049,000 males (i.e. 19% of the total agricultural population), according to the 10th audit revision (1858) - 9,345 million (45.2% agricultural population). Presumably, the models for determining the position of legal state peasants in the Russian state were the crown peasants in Sweden. By law, the state peasants were seen as "free rural inhabitants." State peasants, unlike the peasants of landowners, were seen as persons with legal rights; they could appear in court, trade, and own property. State peasants were also allowed to conduct retail and wholesale trade and open factories. The land on which the state serfs worked was considered to be owned by the state, but the peasants recognized the right of use - in practice, farmers committed transactions as the owners of the land.[2] In addition to the state owned land, in 1801 it was allowed that the farmers could buy and own the rights to private property and "uninhabited" land (that is, land without serfs ).[3] State peasants had the right to use the allotment of 8 acres per capita in the land-poor provinces and 15 acres - in more open provinces. The actual holdings were reduced by the end of 1830 - up to 5 acres in 30 land-poor provinces and 3.1 acres in the 13 open provinces.

In practice, the bulk of the state peasants were making money that was paid as dues to private landowners; in the Kingdom of Poland and the Baltic, state-owned estates were leased to private owners and the state peasants were serving in private serfdom; peasants initially paid grocery dues, followed by monetary dues later in history. In the 1st half of the 18th century, rents ranged from 7 rubles 50 kopecks, to 10 rubles. With the increase of specific serf duties and the number of serfs, the money-rent of the peasants became relatively less than other categories of farmers trespass. The state peasants were also required to pay money into local taxes, paid a poll tax and serve other duties (road construction, waterway improvements, etc.). For many collective obligations many peasants responded with mutual responsibility by an established code of conduct.

Reform Initiated by Pavel Kiselyov

As a result of eventual land shortage and increasing servile duties at the beginning of the 19th century, a progressive depletion of the state peasants resulted. This began to occur more frequently after state peasant unrest (for example the Cholera Riots and Potato Riots of 1834 and 1840–41)due to the reduction of holdings, the severity of dues, and other influences. The question of changing the management of state peasants was cause for numerous state projects.

In the 1830s the government began to reform the management of the state of the village. Through the years 1837-41 reform was implemented, developed by Pavel Kiselev. He established the Ministry of State Property and its local authorities which were assigned "guardianship" over state peasants through the rural community. Corvée duties were eliminated, state peasantry in Lithuania, Belarus and the Ukraine was stopped, renting state peasants out was eliminated, and the system of dues was modernized.

A staunch opponent of serfdom, Kiselev believed that freedom should be introduced gradually, "to destroy slavery by itself and without disruption of the state."

The state government and the peasants were to have the opportunity to decide their own affairs within the framework of the rural community. However, the peasants were still attached to the land. A radical reform of the state of the village was made possible only after the abolition of serfdom. Despite the gradual transformation, they still encountered resistance because landlords feared that the release of government serfs would give a dangerous example to their provate possessory of peasants.

Kiselev intended to regulate the allotments and obligations serfs and partly subordinate them to the Ministry of State Property, but this outraged landowners and was not implemented.

However, in the preparation of the eventual peasant reform of 1861, the drafters of the legislation used the experience Kiselev reforms, especially in the organization of peasant self-determination and the legal status of the farmers.

Elimination of State Peasantry

On the 24th of November 1866, Russia adopted a law "On the Land Device State Peasants", allowing the rural society to maintain land in their possession with the rights of "ownership". Redemption from the government of the property holdings was regulated by the law of 12 June 1886. After the implementation of these reforms, plots of state peasants were reduced by 10% in the central provinces and 44% - in the northern. Payments were calculated for 49 ½ years, and in some cases had to be made before 1931, but were canceled on 1 January 1907 as part of the Stolypin agrarian reform under the influence of the revolution in 1905.

See also

References

  1. Lyubavsky MK Review the history of Russian colonization. M., 1996.
  2. 1 2 Bagger Hans "The reforms of Peter the Great." M., 1985 "
  3. B. Mironov, "The Social History of Russian imperial period (XVIII - beginning of XX century)" "

Farmers on Commons[clarification needed]

  • H. Druzhinin state peasants and reform of PD Kiselev, Moscow-Leningrad, 1958.
  • L. Zakharova, Druzhinin, article "state peasants" in the encyclopedia "National History"
  • AB Muchnik, social and economic aspects of potato riots 1834 and 1841–43 years in Russia, in the collection of popular uprisings in Russia. From the Time of Troubles to the "Green Revolution" against the Soviet Power, ed. H.-D. Lowe, Wiesbaden, 2006, pp. 427–452 (in German).
  • A. Moutchnik: Soziale und wirtschaftliche Grundzüge der Kartoffelaufstände von 1834 und von 1841-1843 in Russland, in: Volksaufstände in Russland. Von der Zeit der Wirren bis zur «Grünen Revolution» gegen die Sowjetherrschaft, hrsg. Von Heinz-Dietrich Löwe ( = Forschungen zur osteuropäischen Geschichte, Bd. 65), Harrassowitz Verlag, Wiesbaden, 2006, S. 427-452)