Traffic circle

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
(Redirected from Traffic rotary)
Jump to: navigation, search

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

Columbus Circle in New York City. Unlike a modern roundabout, the circle is quite large and pedestrians have access to the center island. Access is controlled by traffic lights.
DeSoto Fountain sits in the center of a traffic circle in the City of Coral Gables, Florida. The arterial, DeSoto Boulevard, has unrestricted right of way, while the intersecting streets are controlled by stop signs.
Traffic 10-abreast traverses the Place de l'Étoile. This traffic circle surrounds the Arc de Triomphe at the intersection of ten two-way and two one-way streets. It has no lane markings.

A traffic circle is a type of intersection that directs both turning and through traffic onto a one-way circular roadway, usually built for the purposes of traffic calming or aesthetics.[1] Contrary to a roundabout, where entering traffic always yields to traffic already in the circle and merges in directly, the entrances to traffic circles are 3-way intersections either controlled by stop signs, traffic signals, or not formally controlled.[2] Colloquially, however, roundabouts are sometimes referred to as circles.[3]

In the United States, traffic engineers typically use the term rotary for large scale circular junctions between expressways or controlled-access highways. Rotaries typically feature high speeds inside the circle and on the approaches.[4]

In New England, roundabouts are generally called rotaries and the traffic that is already driving in the rotary always has the right of way. For examples of where this is specified, in Massachusetts "Any operator of a vehicle entering a rotary intersection shall yield the right-of-way to any vehicle already in the intersection.".[5] In Rhode Island entering vehicles "Yield to vehicles in the roundabout." [6]

Distinct from roundabouts, traffic circles and rotaries may also have an interior lane that requires traffic on it to change lanes in order to exit the circle.[7]

<templatestyles src="Template:TOC limit/styles.css" />

Design

Design criteria include:

  • Right-of-way—whether entering or circling vehicles have the right of way. The New Jersey Driver's Manual recommends that, in the absence of flow control signs, traffic yields based on "historically established traffic flow patterns",[8] and there are no set rules.[9] In New England,[10] Washington, D.C. and New York State,[11] entering traffic yields, as is the norm in virtually all countries outside of the U.S.
  • Angle of entry— Angles range from glancing (tangential) that allow full-speed entry to 90 degree angles (perpendicular).[12]
  • Traffic speed—High entry speeds (over 30 mph / 50 km/h) require circulating vehicles to yield, often stopping, which lowers capacity and increases crash rates compared to modern roundabouts.[13]
  • Lane changes— Allowed or not
  • Diameter—The greater the traffic, the larger the circle.[12]
  • Island function—Parking, parks, fountains, etc.[12]

History

French architect Eugène Hénard was designing one-way circular intersections as early as 1877.[14] American architect William Phelps Eno favored small traffic circles. He designed New York City's famous Columbus Circle, which was built in 1905. Other circular intersections were subsequently built in the United States, though many were large diameter 'rotaries' that enabled high speed merge and weave maneuvers. These designs were doomed to failure for two primary reasons:

  • It takes a large diameter circle to provide enough room for merging at speed. Although some of these circles were huge (many were in excess of 100 meters or 300 feet in diameter), they were not large enough for high-speed merging.[citation needed]
  • Giving priority to entering traffic means that more vehicles can enter the circulatory roadway than it can handle. The result is congestion within the circle which could not clear without police intervention.

The experience with traffic circles and rotaries in the US was almost entirely negative,[citation needed] characterized by high accident rates and congestion problems. By the mid 1950s, construction of traffic circles and rotaries had ceased entirely. The experience with traffic circles in other countries was not much better until the development of the modern roundabout in the United Kingdom during the 1960s.

Examples of traffic circles

File:Rotor Zagreb-crop.jpg
The Western Rotary in Zagreb, Croatia with tram lines passing underneath.

United States

Massachusetts

Traffic circles are referred to as "rotaries" in Massachusetts as well as parts of Connecticut, New Hampshire & Vermont; see Rotaries in Massachusetts

Other states

Elsewhere

See also

References

  1. Victoria Transportation Policy Institute Online TDM Encyclopedia: Traffic Calming (modern roundabouts section)
  2. U.S. Department of Transportation: Roundabouts: an Informational Guide para 1.5
  3. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  4. U.S. Department of Transportation: Safety Aspects of Roundabouts presentation
  5. [1]
  6. [2]
  7. U.S. Department of Transportation: Technical Summary: Roundabouts
  8. http://www.state.nj.us/mvc/manuals/chap_04_06.html
  9. http://www.state.nj.us/mvc/pdf/Licenses/Driver%20Manual/Chapter_4.pdf
  10. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  11. :http://www.safeny.com/rowa-vt.htm#1145
  12. 12.0 12.1 12.2 Roundabout: an Informational Guide
  13. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  14. P. M. Wolf, Eugene Henard and the Beginning of Urbanism in Paris, 1900–1914, International Federation for Housing and Planning, The Hague, 1969, cited by Ben Hamilton-Baillie & Phil Jones, Improving traffic behaviour and safety through urban design, Proceedings of ICE – Civil Engineering, volume 158 Issue 5 May 2005 p. 41 http://www.hamilton-baillie.co.uk/papers/ICE_paper_April05.pdf