Trump–Russia dossier

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search

The Trump–Russia dossier, also known as the Steele dossier,[1] is a private intelligence dossier of 17 memos that were consecutively written from June to December 2016[2] by former MI6 intelligence officer Christopher Steele. It contains allegations of misconduct and conspiracy between the Donald Trump campaign and the Russian government before and during the 2016 U.S. presidential election, much of it detailing alleged cooperation between the campaign and Russians to interfere in the election to benefit Trump.[3] The contents of the dossier were published in full by BuzzFeed on January 10, 2017.[4] Several mainstream media outlets have criticized BuzzFeed's decision to publish the dossier.[5][6][7]

Media reports claim that some of the dossier's allegations have been confirmed, while others have yet to be proved or disproved.[8][9] Some claims may require access to classified information for verification.[10] The media, intelligence community, as well as most experts have treated the dossier with caution, while Trump himself denounced the report as "fake news". In February 2017, some details related to conversations between foreign nationals were independently verified.[11] As of December 2017, the dossier's allegations of collusion have not been corroborated.[12][13]

The dossier was produced as part of opposition research during the 2016 U.S. presidential election. After Trump emerged as the probable Republican nominee, attorney Marc Elias of the Perkins Coie law firm retained American research firm Fusion GPS to conduct opposition research about Trump on behalf of the Democratic National Committee and Clinton presidential campaign. Fusion GPS later contracted Steele to compile the dossier.[14] Following Trump's election as president, Steele continued working on the report, with funding from Democrats ceasing and financing finally coming directly from Glenn R. Simpson of Fusion GPS.[15] The completed dossier and its information was then passed on to British and American intelligence services.[16]


The dossier contains multiple allegations, some of which are currently unverified and others for which possible verification is classified.[10] Natasha Bertrand has stated that it "alleges serious misconduct and conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia's government", and that, quoting the dossier, the "well-developed conspiracy of co-operation between [the Trump campaign] and the Russian leadership was managed on the Trump side by the Republican candidate's campaign manager, Paul Manafort."[17]

The memos allege that Russia has been cultivating a relationship with Trump for decades, that the Kremlin favored Trump in the U.S. presidential election, and took various actions during the 2016 election to promote his candidacy and oppose Hillary Clinton's. The document claims that several of Trump's associates, in particular campaign chairman Paul Manafort, Trump's personal attorney Michael D. Cohen, and Trump foreign policy advisor Carter Page, worked with Russian contacts to promote Trump's candidacy. Alleged activities include planning the hack of Democratic National Committee emails and their subsequent leaking, arranging coverups and cash payments, and promising favorable policies toward Russia if Trump was elected. The document also claims that Russian operators possessed compromising information about Trump which could make him subject to blackmail.

Trump has repeatedly denied the allegations, labeling the dossier as "discredited", "debunked", "fictitious", and "fake news".[18]


The dossier and the investigations preceding it were part of opposition research on candidate Trump. Some source claim the investigation into Trump was initially funded by a conservative political website before Steele was involved, and later was funded by Democrats.[19][20][21][2][22] However, it is not clear how much, if any, of the initial research by conservative groups made it into the document. Other sources suggest that the document was entirely funded by the DNC and the Clinton Campaign.[23][24]

In October 2015, during the Republican primary campaign, The Washington Free Beacon, a conservative website primarily funded by Republican donor Paul Singer, hired the American research firm Fusion GPS to conduct general opposition research on Trump and other Republican presidential candidates.[1] For months, Fusion GPS gathered information about Trump, focusing on his business and entertainment activities. When Trump became the presumptive nominee on May 3, 2016, The Free Beacon stopped funding research on him.[2][25][26]

In April 2016, Marc Elias, a partner in the large Seattle-based law firm Perkins Coie and head of its Political Law practice, hired Fusion GPS to do opposition research on Trump. Elias was the attorney of record for the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and the Clinton presidential campaign.[14] As part of their investigation, Fusion GPS hired Orbis Business Intelligence, a private British intelligence firm, to look into connections between Trump and Russia. Orbis co-founder Christopher Steele, a retired British MI6 officer with expertise in Russian matters,[2] was hired in May or June to do the job.[27]

According to Fusion GPS's co-owners, Glenn R. Simpson and Peter Fritsch, they did not tell Steele who their clients were and "gave him no specific marching orders beyond this basic question: 'Why did Mr. Trump repeatedly seek to do deals in a notoriously corrupt police state that most serious investors shun?'"[28] In total, Perkins Coie paid Fusion GPS $1.02 million in fees and expenses, $168,000 of which was paid to Orbis and used by them to produce the dossier.[29] Simpson has stated that Steele did not pay any of his sources.[30][28]

According to Steele, he soon found "troubling information indicating connections between Trump and the Russian government. He said that, according to his sources, "there was an established exchange of information between the Trump campaign and the Kremlin of mutual benefit." He described the finding as "an extraordinary situation" and concluded it was "sufficiently serious" for him to share it with the FBI, which he did in July 2016.[31]

Steele delivered his report as a series of two- or three-page memos, starting in June 2016 and continuing through December. He continued his investigation even after the Democratic client stopped paying for it following Trump's election.[2] After the election, Fusion GPS co-owner Simpson "reportedly spent his own money to continue the investigation".[15]

On his own initiative, Steele decided to also pass the information to British and American intelligence services because he believed the findings were a matter of national security for both countries.[32] According to the testimony of Fusion GPS co-founder Glenn Simpson, Steele approached the FBI because he was concerned that the then candidate, Donald Trump, was being blackmailed by Russia.[33] However, he became frustrated with the FBI, which he believed was failing to investigate his reports, choosing instead to focus on the investigation into Hillary Clinton's emails. According to The Independent, Steele came to believe that there was a "cabal" inside the FBI, particularly its New York field office linked to Trump advisor Rudy Giuliani, which blocked any attempts to investigate the links between Trump and Russia.[32] In October 2016, Steele had compiled 33 pages (16 memos) and passed on what he discovered so far to a reporter from Mother Jones magazine.[31]

In a court filing in April 2017, Steele revealed previously unreported information that in December 2016, shortly after the presidential election, he gave a copy of the 16 memos to "the senior British national security official and sent an encrypted version to Fusion GPS with instructions to deliver a hard copy to Senator John McCain (R-AZ).[34] McCain, who had been informed about the alleged links between Kremlin and Trump, met with former British ambassador to Moscow Sir Andrew Wood. Wood confirmed the existence of the dossier and vouched for Steele's "professionalism and integrity".[32] McCain obtained the dossier from David J. Kramer and took it directly to FBI director James Comey on December 9, 2016.[2][21] Comey has confirmed that counter-intelligence investigations are under way into possible links between Trump associates and Moscow, and CNN has reported that the FBI used the dossier to bolster its investigations."[34]

After delivering the 16 memos, more information was received, and two more pages, the "December memo", dated "13 December 2016", was prepared. It alleged efforts by Trump's personal attorney, Michael Cohen, to pay those who had hacked the DNC and to "cover up all traces of the hacking operation".[35][34] Trump and Cohen have denied the allegations.[35][34][36] Cohen said that between August 23 and August 29 he was in Los Angeles and in New York for the entire month of September.[37] According to a Czech intelligence source, there is no record of him entering Prague by plane, but Respekt magazine pointed out that it's theoretically possible he could have entered by car or train from a neighboring country in the Schengen Zone.[38]

Hints of existence

By the third quarter of 2016, many news organizations knew about the existence of the dossier, which had been described as an "open secret" among journalists. However, they chose not to publish information that could not be confirmed.[2] Finally on October 31, 2016, a week before the election, Mother Jones reported that a former intelligence officer, whom they did not name, had produced a report based on Russian sources and turned it over to the FBI.[31] It starts with the allegation that:

The "Russian regime has been cultivating, supporting and assisting TRUMP for at least 5 years. Aim, endorsed by PUTIN, has been to encourage splits and divisions in western alliance". It maintained that Trump "and his inner circle have accepted a regular flow of intelligence from the Kremlin, including on his Democratic and other political rivals". It claimed that Russian intelligence had "compromised" Trump during his visits to Moscow and could "blackmail him".

— Mother Jones, October 31, 2016[31]

In October 2016, the FBI reached an agreement with Steele to pay him to continue his work, according to involved sources reported by The Washington Post. "Steele was known for the quality of his past work and for the knowledge he had developed over nearly 20 years working on Russia-related issues for British intelligence."[39] The FBI found Steele credible and his unproved information worthy enough that it considered paying Steele to continue collecting information, but the release of the document to the public stopped discussions between Steele and the FBI.[39]

President-Elect Trump and President Barack Obama were briefed on the existence of the dossier by the chiefs of several U.S. intelligence agencies in early January 2017. Vice President Joe Biden has confirmed that he and the president had received briefings on the dossier, and the allegations within.[40][25][41][42]

On January 10, 2017, CNN reported that classified documents presented to Obama and Trump the previous week included allegations that Russian operatives possess "compromising personal and financial information" about Trump. CNN stated that it would not publish specific details on the memos because it had not "independently corroborated the specific allegations".[43][44] Following the CNN report,[45] BuzzFeed published a 35-page dossier that it said was the basis of the briefing, including unverified claims that Russian operatives had collected "embarrassing material" involving Trump that could be used to blackmail him.[46][47][44][48]

Many news organizations knew about the document in the fall of 2016, before the presidential election, but did not publish it because they could not independently verify the information.[49] BuzzFeed was harshly criticized for publishing what Washington Post columnist Margaret Sullivan called "scurrilous allegations dressed up as an intelligence report meant to damage Donald Trump",[50] while The New York Times noted that the publication sparked a debate centering on the use of unsubstantiated information from anonymous sources.[51] BuzzFeed's executive staff said the materials were newsworthy because they were "in wide circulation at the highest levels of American government and media" and argued that this justified public release.[5]


When CNN reported the existence of the dossier on January 10, 2017,[52] it did not name the author of the dossier, but revealed that he was British. Steele concluded that his anonymity had been "fatally compromised" and realized it was "only a matter of time until his name became public knowledge", and, accompanied by his family, he fled into hiding in fear of "a prompt and potentially dangerous backlash against him from Moscow".[53][54][20] The Wall Street Journal revealed Steele's name the next day, on January 11.[55] Orbis Business Intelligence Ltd, for whom Steele worked at the time the dossier was authored, and its director Christopher Burrows would not "confirm or deny" that Orbis had produced the dossier.[52][2]

Called by the media a "highly regarded Kremlin expert" and "one of MI6's greatest Russia specialists", Steele formerly worked for the British intelligence agency MI6 and is currently working for Orbis Business Intelligence Ltd, a private intelligence company Steele co-founded in London.[56][55][57] Steele entered MI6 in 1987, directly after his graduation from Cambridge University.[58]

Former British ambassador to Moscow Sir Andrew Wood has vouched for Steele's reputation.[32] He views Steele as a "very competent professional operator ... I take the report seriously. I don't think it's totally implausible." He also stated that "the report's key allegation—that Trump and Russia's leadership were communicating via secret back channels during the presidential campaign—was eminently plausible".[59]

On December 26, 2016, Oleg Erovinkin, a former KGB/FSB general, was found dead in his car in Moscow. Erovinkin was a key liaison between Igor Sechin, head of state-owned oil company Rosneft, and President Putin. Steele claimed much of the information came from a source close to Sechin. According to Christo Grozev, a journalist at Risk Management Lab, a think-tank based in Bulgaria, the circumstances of Erovinkin's death were "mysterious". Grozev suspected Erovinkin helped Steele compile the dossier on Trump and suggests the hypothesis that the death may have been part of a cover-up by the Russian government.[60][61] Mark Galeotti, senior research fellow at the Institute of International Relations Prague, who specializes in Russian history and security, rejected Grozev's hypothesis.[62][60] In interviews with Luke Harding, "Steele was adamant that Erovinkin wasn't his source and 'not one of ours.' As a person close to Steele put it to me: 'Sometimes people just die.'"[63]

On March 7, 2017, as some members of the U.S. Congress were expressing interest in meeting with or hearing testimony from Steele, he reemerged after weeks in hiding, appearing publicly on camera and stating, "I'm really pleased to be back here working again at the Orbis's offices in London today."[64]


Observers and experts have had varying reactions to the dossier. Generally, "former intelligence officers and other national-security experts" urged "skepticism and caution" but still took "the fact that the nation's top intelligence officials chose to present a summary version of the dossier to both President Obama and President-elect Trump" as an indication "that they may have had a relatively high degree of confidence that at least some of the claims therein were credible, or at least worth investigating further".[65] The author of the dossier said he believes that 70–90% of the document is accurate.[66] Steele said that his FBI contacts greeted his intelligence report with "shock and horror".[66] In his June 2017 congressional testimony, former FBI director James Comey called "some personally sensitive aspects" of the dossier "salacious and unverified," but he did not state that the entire dossier was unverified or that the salacious aspects were false. When Senator Richard Burr asked if any of the allegations in the dossier had been confirmed, Comey said he could not answer that question in a public setting.[67][10]

Vice President Biden told reporters that while he and President Obama were receiving a briefing on the extent of Russian hackers trying to influence the US election, there was a two-page addendum which addressed the contents of the Steele dossier.[68] Top intelligence officials told them they "felt obligated to inform them about uncorroborated allegations about President-elect Donald Trump out of concern the information would become public and catch them off-guard".[69]

Former Los Angeles Times Moscow correspondent Robert Gillette wrote in an op-ed in the Concord Monitor that the dossier has had at least one of its main factual assertions verified. On January 6, 2017, the Director of National Intelligence released a report assessing "with high confidence" that Russia's combined cyber and propaganda operation was directed personally by Vladimir Putin, with the aim of harming Hillary Clinton's candidacy and helping Trump.[70] Gillette wrote: "Steele's dossier, paraphrasing multiple sources, reported precisely the same conclusion, in greater detail, six months earlier, in a memo dated June 20."[71]

Newsweek published a list of "13 things that don't add up" in the dossier, writing that the document was a "strange mix of the amateur and the insightful" and stating that the document "contains lots of Kremlin-related gossip that could indeed be, as the author claims, from deep insiders—or equally gleaned" from Russian newspapers and blogs.[72] Former UK ambassador to Russia Sir Tony Brenton stated that certain aspects of the dossier were inconsistent with British intelligence's understanding of how the Kremlin works, commenting: "I've seen quite a lot of intelligence on Russia, and there are some things in [the dossier] which look pretty shaky."[73]

According to Business Insider, the dossier alleges that "the Trump campaign agreed to minimize US opposition to Russia's incursions into Ukraine".[17] In July 2016, the Republican National Convention made changes to the Republican Party's platform on Ukraine: initially they proposed providing "lethal weapons" to Ukraine, but the line was changed to "appropriate assistance". J. D. Gordon, who was one of Trump's national security advisers during the campaign, said that he had advocated for changing language because that reflected what Trump had said.[17][74]

Reputation in the U.S. intelligence community

According to Paul Wood of BBC News, the information in Steele's report is also reported by "multiple intelligence sources" and "at least one East European intelligence service". They report that “compromising material on Mr. Trump” included "more than one tape, not just video, but audio as well, on more than one date, in more than one place, in both Moscow and St. Petersburg.” While also mentioning that "nobody should believe something just because an intelligence agent says it",[75][55] he added that "the CIA believes it is credible that the Kremlin has such kompromat—or compromising material—on the next US commander in chief" and "a joint taskforce, which includes the CIA and the FBI, has been investigating allegations that the Russians may have sent money to Mr Trump's organisation or his election campaign".[76][77][75] On March 30, 2017, Wood reported that the FBI was using the dossier as a roadmap for its investigation.[78] On April 18, 2017, CNN reported that, according to U.S. officials, information from the dossier had been used as part of the basis for getting the FISA warrant to monitor former Trump foreign policy adviser Carter Page during the summer of 2016. Officials told CNN this information would have had to be independently corroborated by the FBI before being used to obtain the warrant.[16]

Susan Hennessey, a former National Security Agency lawyer now with the Brookings Institution, stated: "My general take is that the intelligence community and law enforcement seem to be taking these claims seriously. That itself is highly significant. But it is not the same as these allegations being verified. Even if this was an intelligence community document—which it isn't—this kind of raw intelligence is still treated with skepticism."[65][79] Hennessey and Benjamin Wittes wrote that "the current state of the evidence makes a powerful argument for a serious public inquiry into this matter".[79] Robert S. Litt, a former lawyer for the Director of National Intelligence, wrote that the dossier "played absolutely no role" in the intelligence community's determination that Russia had interfered in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.[80]

On February 10, 2017, CNN reported that some communications between "senior Russian officials and other Russian individuals" described in the dossier had been corroborated by multiple U.S. officials. They "took place between the same individuals on the same days and from the same locations as detailed in the dossier". Sources told CNN that some conversations had been "intercepted during routine intelligence gathering", but refused to reveal the content of conversations, or specify which communications were detailed in the dossier. CNN was unable to confirm whether conversations were related to Trump. U.S. officials said the corroboration gave "US intelligence and law enforcement 'greater confidence' in the credibility of some aspects of the dossier as they continue to actively investigate its contents".[11]

British journalist Julian Borger wrote in October 2017 that "Steele’s reports are being taken seriously after lengthy scrutiny by federal and congressional investigators", at least Steele's assessment that Russia had conducted a campaign to interfere in the 2016 election to Clinton's detriment; that part of the Steele dossier "has generally gained in credibility, rather than lost it".[81] Liberal commentator Jonathan Chait wrote in December 2017 about the dossier that mainstream media "treat it as gossip" whereas the intelligence community "take it seriously".[82]

Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-Rhode Island), member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, has stated: "As I understand it, a good deal of his information remains unproven, but none of it has been disproven, and considerable amounts of it have been proven."[83]

Carter Page testimony

On November 2, 2017, Carter Page, Donald Trump's foreign policy adviser during the campaign, testified before the House Intelligence Committee which is investigating Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections. Page testified he informed Jeff Sessions, J. D. Gordon, Hope Hicks and Corey Lewandowski, Trump's campaign manager, of a planned trip to Russia and that Lewandowski approved the trip, responding "If you'd like to go on your own, not affiliated with the campaign, you know, that's fine."[84][85] In his testimony, Page admitted he met with high ranking Kremlin officials. Previously, Page had denied meeting any Russian officials during the trip. His comments appeared to corroborate portions of the dossier.[86][87]

Use in 2017 Special Counsel investigation

According to Senate Intelligence Committee vice chairman Mark Warner (D-VA), the dossier's allegations are being investigated by a Special Counsel led by Robert Mueller, which is also investigating allegations of Russian interference in the 2016 elections.[88] In the summer of 2017, Mueller's team of investigators met with Christopher Steele.[89] As some leads stemming from the dossier have already been followed and confirmed by the FBI, legal experts have stated that Special Counsel investigators, headed by Robert Mueller, are obligated to follow any leads the dossier has presented them with, irrespective of what parties financed it in its various stages of development, or "[t]hey would be derelict in their duty if they didn't."[88][90]

While Trump and some Republicans have claimed that the dossier was behind the beginning of the investigation into the Trump campaign's potential conspiracy with Russia, in December 2017, former and current intelligence officials revealed that the actual impetus was a series of comments made in May 2016 by Trump campaign foreign policy advisor George Papadopoulos during a night of "heavy drinking at an upscale London bar" made to a top Australian diplomat in Britain. Papadopoulos revealed that he had inside information by bragging that the Kremlin had "thousands of emails" stolen from Hillary Clinton which could be used to damage her campaign. He had learned this about three weeks earlier. Two months later, when WikiLeaks started releasing DNC emails, Australian officials alerted the Americans about Papadopoulos' remarks.[91][92]

Other soon-discovered factors then played into the FBI's decision to investigate Russian interference and any role played by the Trump campaign: intelligence from friendly governments, especially the British and Dutch, and then the information about a trip to Moscow by Trump adviser Carter Page. Steele's first report was sent to Fusion GPS, dated June 20, 2016, and FBI agents first interviewed Steele in October 2016.[92] A year later, in October 2017, Papadopoulos pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI, and became a cooperating witness in Mueller's investigation.[91]


November 14, 2017 – House Intelligence Committee Transcript by Glenn Simpson
August 22, 2017 Fusion GPS Testimony Transcript of Glenn Simpson

Donald Trump called the dossier "fake news" and criticized the intelligence and media sources that published it.[93] During a press conference on January 11, 2017, Trump denounced the unsubstantiated claims as false, saying that it was "disgraceful" for U.S. intelligence agencies to report them. Trump refused to answer a question from CNN's senior White House correspondent Jim Acosta on the subject. In response, CNN said that it had published "carefully sourced reporting" on the matter which had been "matched by the other major news organizations", as opposed to BuzzFeed's posting of "unsubstantiated materials".[94][45] James Clapper described the leaks as damaging to US national security.[95] This also contradicted Trump's previous claim that Clapper said the information was false; Clapper's statement actually said the intelligence community had made no judgement on the truth or falsity of the information.[96]

Russian press secretary Dmitry Peskov insisted in an interview that the document is a fraud, saying "I can assure you that the allegations in this funny paper, in this so-called report, they are untrue. They are all fake."[97] The President of Russia, Vladimir Putin, called the people who leaked the document "worse than prostitutes"[98] and referred to the dossier itself as "rubbish".[99] Putin went on to state he believed that the dossier was "clearly fake",[100] fabricated as a plot against the legitimacy of President-elect Donald Trump.[101]

Some of Steele's former colleagues expressed support for his character, saying "The idea his work is fake or a cowboy operation is false—completely untrue. Chris is an experienced and highly regarded professional. He's not the sort of person who will simply pass on gossip."[102]

Among journalists, Bob Woodward called the dossier a "garbage document," while Carl Bernstein took the opposite view, noting that the senior-most U.S. intelligence officials had determined that the content was worth reporting to the president and the president-elect.[103]

Ynet, an Israeli online news site, reported on January 12, 2017 that U.S. intelligence advised Israeli intelligence officers to be cautious about sharing information with the incoming Trump administration, until the possibility of Russian influence over Trump, suggested by Steele's report, has been fully investigated.[104]

Aleksej Gubarev, chief of technology company XBT and a figure mentioned in the dossier, sued BuzzFeed for defamation on February 3, 2017. The suit, filed in a Broward County, Florida court, centers on allegations from the dossier that XBT had been "using botnets and porn traffic to transmit viruses, plant bugs, steal data and conduct 'altering operations' against the Democratic Party leadership".[105][106] In the High Court of Justice, Steele's lawyers said their client did not intend for the memos to be released, and that one of the memos "needed to be analyzed and further investigated/verified".[107]

On March 2, 2017, media began reporting that the Senate may call Steele to testify about the Trump dossier.[108] On March 27, 2017, Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley asked the Department of Justice to initiate an inquiry into Fusion GPS, who initially retained Steele to write the dossier.[109] Fusion GPS was previously associated with pro-Russia lobbying activities due to sanctions imposed by the Magnitsky Act.[110] On August 22, 2017, Steele met with the FBI and had provided them with the names of his sources for the allegations in the dossier.[111]

Steven L. Hall, former CIA chief of Russia operations, has compared Steele's methods with those of Donald Trump Jr., who sought information from a Russian attorney in June 2016: "The distinction: Steele spied against Russia to get info Russia did not want released; Don Jr took a mtg to get info Russians wanted to give."[112]

On January 2, 2018, the founders of Fusion GPS, Glenn R. Simpson and Peter Fritsch authored an op-ed in the New York Times, requesting that Republicans, "release full transcripts of our firm’s testimony" and further wrote that, "the Steele dossier was not the trigger for the F.B.I.’s investigation into Russian meddling. As we told the Senate Judiciary Committee in August, our sources said the dossier was taken so seriously because it corroborated reports the bureau had received from other sources, including one inside the Trump camp."[28] Ken Dilanian of NBC News clarified that a "source close to Fusion GPS" told him that the FBI had not planted anyone in the Trump camp, but rather that Simpson was referring to George Papadopoulos.[113][114]

On January 5, 2018, in the first known Congressional criminal referral resulting from investigations related to the Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. election, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee Chuck Grassley made a referral to the Justice Department suggesting that they investigate possible criminal charges against Christopher Steele, author of the dossier.[115][116] Senator Lindsey Graham also signed the letter.[117][118] Both Grassley and Graham declared that they were not alleging that Steele "had committed any crime. Rather, they had passed on the information for 'further investigation only'."[119] The referral was met with skepticism from legal experts, as well as some of the other Republicans and Democrats on the Judiciary committee, who had reportedly not been consulted.[117]

On January 8, 2018, a spokesman for Grassley said he did not plan to release the transcript of Simpson's August 22, 2017 testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee.[120] The next day, Ranking Committee Member Senator Dianne Feinstein unilaterally released the transcript.[121][122]

Also on January 9, 2018, Donald Trump’s personal attorney Michael Cohen sued Buzzfeed for defamation over allegations about him in the dossier, which Buzzfeed had published.[123]

On January 18, 2018, the United States House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence released the transcript of the Glenn Simpson Testimony given on November 14, 2017.[124][125] Democratic committee member Adam Schiff stated that the testimony contains "serious allegations that The Trump Organization may have engaged in money laundering with Russian nationals". Trump Organization's chief counsel Alan Garten called the allegations "unsubstantiated" and "reckless", and said that Simpson was mainly referring to properties to which Trump licensed his name. Democratic member Jim Himes said that Simpson "did not provide evidence and I think that's an important point. He made allegations."[126]

See also


  1. 1.0 1.1 Vogel, Kenneth P.; Haberman, Maggie (October 27, 2017). "Conservative Website First Funded Anti-Trump Research by Firm That Later Produced Dossier". The New York Times.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 Shane, Scott; Confessore, Nicholas; Rosenberg, Matthew (January 11, 2017). "How a Sensational, Unverified Dossier Became a Crisis for Donald Trump". The New York Times. Retrieved January 17, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  3. Sumter, Kyler (November 16, 2017). "The five most interesting claims in the Donald Trump dossier". The Week. Retrieved January 10, 2018.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  4. Bensinger, Ken; Elder, Miriam; Schoofs, Mark (January 10, 2017). "These Reports Allege Trump Has Deep Ties To Russia". BuzzFeed. Retrieved December 24, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  5. 5.0 5.1 Graham, David A. (January 11, 2017). "The Trouble With Publishing the Trump Dossier". The Atlantic. Retrieved January 10, 2018.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  6. Bump, Philip (January 11, 2017). "BuzzFeed, the Russia dossier and the problem of too much information". The Washington Post. Retrieved July 29, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  7. Zurawik, David (January 11, 2017). "BuzzFeed undermines all journalists with Trump 'dossier'". The Baltimore Sun. Retrieved January 10, 2018.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  8. Beavers, Olivia (December 27, 2017). "House Intel panel subpoenas McCain associate over Trump dossier". The Hill. Retrieved January 10, 2018. Certain parts of the dossier have either been confirmed or proven false, while other parts of the memo compilation remain unverified.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  9. Lee, Michelle Ye Hee (December 26, 2017). "Trump slams FBI, Obamacare in post-Christmas tweets". The Washington Post. Retrieved January 11, 2018. Officials have said some of the information it contains has been corroborated, but other parts – including the most salacious claims about Trump's behavior – remain unverified.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  10. 10.0 10.1 10.2 Berke, Jeremy (June 8, 2017). "Comey's cryptic answer about the infamous Trump dossier makes it look likely it could be verified". Business Insider. Retrieved January 23, 2018.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  11. 11.0 11.1 Sciutto, Jim; Perez, Evan (February 10, 2017). "US investigators corroborate some aspects of the Russia dossier". CNN. Retrieved February 10, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  12. Keneally, Meghan (December 26, 2017). "Trump slams 'bogus' Russian dossier and says the FBI is 'tainted'". ABC News. Retrieved January 11, 2018. The dossier is uncorroborated but not disproved.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  13. Prokop, Andrew. “What we learned about Trump, Russia, and collusion in 2017”, Vox (website) (December 28, 2017): “Yet as 2017 winds down, there is still no clear answer to the central question at the heart of the probe: Did Trump’s team collude with the Russian government during the 2016 campaign?...[T]here are the darker possibilities of the sort alleged in the salacious and mostly uncorroborated Steele dossier.”
  14. 14.0 14.1 Entous, Adam; Barrett, Devlin; Helderman, Rosalind (October 24, 2017). "Clinton campaign, DNC paid for research that led to Russia dossier". The Washington Post. Retrieved October 25, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  15. 15.0 15.1 Sampathkumar, Mythili (August 23, 2017). "Trump-Russia dossier sources revealed to the FBI by Christopher Steele". The Independent. Archived from the original on August 29, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  16. 16.0 16.1 Perez, Evan; Prokupecz, Shimon; Raju, Manu (April 18, 2017). "FBI used dossier allegations to bolster Trump-Russia investigation". CNN. Retrieved April 19, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  17. 17.0 17.1 17.2 Bertrand, Natasha (February 11, 2017). "The timeline of Trump's ties with Russia lines up with allegations of conspiracy and misconduct". Business Insider. Retrieved December 29, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  18. Breuninger, Kevin (January 13, 2018). "Fusion GPS testimony on infamous dossier shines new light on Trump's perilous financial ties". CNBC. Retrieved January 18, 2018.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  19. Kenneth P Vogel (October 25, 2107). "The Trump Dossier: What We Know and Who Paid for It". NY Times. Retrieved February 6, 2018. Check date values in: |date= (help)<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  20. 20.0 20.1 Gordon, Raynor. "Former MI6 officer Christopher Steele, who produced Donald Trump Russian dossier, 'terrified for his safety' and went to ground before name released". The Telegraph. Retrieved January 11, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  21. 21.0 21.1 Borger, Julian (January 11, 2017). "John McCain passes dossier alleging secret Trump-Russia contacts to FBI". The Guardian. Retrieved January 12, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  22. "Conservative Free Beacon originally funded firm that created Trump-Russia dossier". POLITICO. Retrieved February 2, 2018.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  23. Adam Entous, Devlin Barrett and Rosalind S. Helderman (October 24, 2017). "Clinton campaign, DNC paid for research that led to Russia dossier". Washington Post. Retrieved February 6, 2018.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  24. Kush Desai (October 25, 2017). "FACT CHECK: DID REPUBLICANS PAY FOR THE TRUMP DOSSIER?". CheckYourFact. Retrieved February 6, 2018.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  25. 25.0 25.1 Borger, Julian (January 11, 2017). "How the Trump dossier came to light: secret sources, a retired spy and John McCain". The Guardian. Retrieved January 17, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  26. Reince Priebus [@Reince] (May 3, 2016). ".@realDonaldTrump will be presumptive @GOP nominee, we all need to unite and focus on defeating @HillaryClinton #NeverClinton" (Tweet) – via Twitter.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  27. Johnson, Kevin; Kelly, Erin (January 9, 2018). "Dossier author was told FBI had a source inside Trump Organization". USA TODAY. Retrieved January 10, 2018.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  28. 28.0 28.1 28.2 Simpson, Glenn R.; Fritsch, Peter (January 2, 2018). "Opinion". The New York Times. Retrieved January 3, 2018.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  29. Hosenball, Mark (November 1, 2017). "Ex-British spy paid $168,000 for Trump dossier, U.S. firm discloses". Reuters. Retrieved November 7, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  30. Raju, Manu; Herb, Jeremy; Polantz, Katelyn (November 16, 2017). "Fusion GPS co-founder: Steele didn't pay sources for dossier on Trump". CNN. Retrieved November 19, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  31. 31.0 31.1 31.2 31.3 Corn, David (October 31, 2016). "A Veteran Spy Has Given the FBI Information Alleging a Russian Operation to Cultivate Donald Trump". Mother Jones. Retrieved January 12, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  32. 32.0 32.1 32.2 32.3 "Ex-MI6 agent so worried by his Donald Trump discoveries he started working without pay". The Independent. January 13, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  33. [1]
  34. 34.0 34.1 34.2 34.3 Borger, Julian (April 28, 2017). "UK was given details of alleged contacts between Trump campaign and Moscow". The Guardian. Retrieved April 30, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  35. 35.0 35.1 Harding, Luke (May 10, 2017). "What do we know about alleged links between Trump and Russia?". The Guardian. Retrieved October 25, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  36. Cormier, Anthony (May 5, 2017). "This Is The Inside Of Trump's Lawyer's Passport". BuzzFeed. Retrieved December 24, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  37. Gray, Rosie (January 10, 2017). "Michael Cohen: 'It Is Fake News Meant to Malign Mr. Trump'". The Atlantic. Retrieved December 24, 2017.

    Quote: I'm telling you emphatically that I've not been to Prague, I've never been to Czech [Republic], I've not been to Russia.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>

  38. RFE/RL (January 11, 2017). "Report: Czech Intelligence Says No Evidence Trump Lawyer Traveled To Prague". RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty. Retrieved January 19, 2018.

    Quote: According to Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, 'A Czech intelligence source told the Respekt magazine that there is no record of Cohen arriving in Prague by plane, although the news weekly pointed out he could have traveled by car or train from a nearby EU country, avoiding passport control under Schengen zone travel rules.'<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>

  39. 39.0 39.1 Hamburger, Tom; Helderman, Rosalind S. (February 28, 2017). "FBI once planned to pay former British spy who authored controversial Trump dossier". The Washington Post. Retrieved March 1, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  40. Nowicki, Dan (January 12, 2017). "John McCain intrigue grows in Donald Trump dossier affair". The Arizona Republic.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  41. Dilanian, Ken (January 12, 2017). "FBI's Comey Told Trump About Russia Dossier After Intel Briefing". NBC News.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  42. "Biden: Obama and I were told about Trump dossier ahead of leaks". AOL. January 12, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  43. Perez, Evan; Sciutto, Jim; Tapper, Jake; Bernstein, Carl (January 12, 2017). "Intel chiefs presented Trump with claims of Russian efforts to compromise him". CNN. Retrieved January 11, 2018.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  44. 44.0 44.1 Wemple, Erik. "BuzzFeed's ridiculous rationale for publishing the Trump-Russia dossier". The Washington Post. Retrieved January 11, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  45. 45.0 45.1 Sutton, Kelsey. "Trump calls CNN 'fake news', as channel defends its reporting on intelligence briefing". Politico. Retrieved January 11, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  46. Jeff Stein (January 10, 2017). "Trump, Russian Spies, and the Infamous "Golden Showers" Memos". Newsweek.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  47. "U.S. Spies Warn Trump and GOP: Russia Could Get You Next". The Daily Beast. Retrieved January 11, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  48. "Trump Received Unsubstantiated Report That Russia Had Damaging Information About Him". The New York Times. Retrieved January 11, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  49. Ember, Sydney; Grynbaum, Michael M. (January 10, 2017). "BuzzFeed Posts Unverified Claims on Trump, Igniting a Debate". The New York Times.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  50. Margaret Sullivan, (January 11, 2017). "How BuzzFeed crossed the line in publishing salacious 'dossier' on Trump". The Washington Post. Retrieved July 31, 2017.CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link)<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  51. Smith, Ben (January 23, 2017). "Why BuzzFeed News Published the Dossier". The New York Times.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  52. 52.0 52.1 Nichols, Hans (January 1, 1970). "Former British Spy Christopher Steele Prepared Explosive Trump Memo". NBC News. Retrieved January 12, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  53. Staff; agencies (January 12, 2017). "Christopher Steele, ex-MI6 officer, named as author of Trump dossier". The Guardian. Retrieved January 18, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  54. "Ex-MI6 officer Christopher Steele in hiding after Trump dossier". BBC News. January 12, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  55. 55.0 55.1 55.2 Hope, Bradley; Rothfeld, Michael; Cullison, Alan (January 11, 2017). "Christopher Steele, Ex-British Intelligence Officer, Said to Have Prepared Dossier on Trump". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved January 18, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  56. Neubert, Michele; Dilanian, Ken; Vinograd, Cassandra; Connor, Tracy (January 13, 2017). "The ex-spy who wrote the Trump dossier is nicknamed James Bond". NBC News.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  57. Behar, Richard. "Could This Be The British Ex-MI6 Agent Behind The Trump FBI Memos?". Forbes. Retrieved January 11, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  58. Hughes, Chris. "First picture of British spy behind Donald Trump 'dirty dossier' revealed". Mirror. Retrieved January 12, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  59. Harding, Luke; Hopkins, Nick (January 13, 2017). "UK's former Moscow ambassador in spotlight over Trump dossier". The Guardian. Retrieved January 18, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  60. 60.0 60.1 Mendick, Robert; Verkaik, Robert (January 27, 2017). "Mystery death of ex-KGB chief linked to MI6 spy's dossier on Donald Trump". The Telegraph. Retrieved January 31, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  61. Zois, Chris (January 28, 2017). "Russians suspected of aiding investigations into hacking are being arrested and possibly murdered". Retrieved January 31, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  62. Durand, Corentin (January 30, 2017). "Oleg Erovinkin, l'espion russe qui en aurait trop dit sur Trump et la Russie". Numerama (in français). Retrieved July 31, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  63. Harding, Luke (2017). Collusion: Secret Meetings, Dirty Money, and How Russia Helped Donald Trump Win. Knopf Doubleday. p. 101. ISBN 9780525520931.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  64. Withnall, Adam (March 7, 2017). "Ex-British spy Christopher Steele breaks silence over Trump Russia dossier". The Independent. Retrieved March 26, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  65. 65.0 65.1 Tracy, Abigail (January 11, 2017). "What Intelligence Experts Think of the Explosive Trump-Russia Report". Vanity Fair. Retrieved July 31, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  66. 66.0 66.1 Borger, Julian (November 15, 2017). "Christopher Steele believes his dossier on Trump-Russia is 70–90% accurate". The Guardian. Retrieved November 15, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  67. Comey, James (June 8, 2017). "READ: James Comey's prepared testimony". CNN. Retrieved January 1, 2018.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  68. Hensch, Mark (January 12, 2017). "Biden: Intel officials warned us of Trump dossier". The Hill. Retrieved February 1, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  69. "Biden: Intel officials told us Trump allegations might leak". The Big Story. Retrieved February 1, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  70. Background to 'Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent US Elections': The Analytic Process and Cyber Incident Attribution (PDF) (Report). Office of the Director of National Intelligence. January 6, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  71. Gillette, Robert (January 27, 2017). "My Turn: Inside the Trump dossier". Concord Monitor. Concord, New Hampshire.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  72. Matthews, Owen (January 11, 2017). "Thirteen things that don't add up in the Russia-Trump intelligence dossier". Newsweek. Retrieved February 1, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  73. "Trump dossier 'shaky' – former British envoy". Sky News. January 13, 2017. Retrieved February 28, 2017. A former ambassador to Moscow casts doubts over elements of the report, as friends of the UK spy behind it leap to his defence.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  74. Murray, Sara; Acosta, Jim; Schleifer, Theodore (March 4, 2017). "More Trump advisers disclose meetings with Russia's ambassador". CNN. Retrieved April 10, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  75. 75.0 75.1 Lange, Jeva (January 11, 2017). "BBC claims a second source backs up Trump dossier". The Week.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  76. Wood, Paul (January 12, 2017). "Trump 'compromising' claims: How and why did we get here?". BBC News.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  77. Drum, Kevin (January 12, 2017). "BBC's Paul Wood: There are four sources for claims of possible Trump-Russia blackmail". Mother Jones.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  78. Bertrand, Natasha (March 30, 2017). "The FBI is reportedly using the explosive Trump-Russia dossier as a 'roadmap' for its investigation". Business Insider. Retrieved April 19, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  79. 79.0 79.1 Hennessey, Susan; Wittes, Benjamin (January 12, 2017). "Why Are the Trump Allegations Hanging Around When They Haven't Been Substantiated?". Lawfare.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  80. Bertrand, Natasha (October 27, 2017). "Former intel official: Trump-Russia dossier 'played no role' in our analysis of Russian meddling". Business Insider. Retrieved October 29, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  81. Borger, Julian (October 7, 2017). "The Trump-Russia dossier: why its findings grow more significant by the day". The Guardian. Retrieved December 28, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  82. Chait, Jonathan (December 7, 2017). "The Steele Dossier on Trump and Russia Is Looking More and More Real". New York magazine. Retrieved December 28, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  83. Hosenball, Mark; Landay, Jonathan (October 11, 2017). "U.S. congressional panels spar over 'Trump dossier' on Russia contacts". Reuters. Retrieved December 29, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  84. Tracy, Abigail (November 7, 2017). "Is Carter Page Digging the Trump Administration's Grave?". Vanity Fair.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  85. Raju, Manu; Herb, Jeremy; Polantz, Katelyn (November 8, 2017). "Carter Page reveals new contacts with Trump campaign, Russians". CNN.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  86. Lanktree, Graham (November 7, 2017). "Carter Page Attacked Christopher Steele's Trump Dossier But His Testimony Raised Questions Over Russian Meetings". Newsweek.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  87. Kelly, Erin (November 6, 2017). "Trump campaign adviser Carter Page acknowledges meeting with senior Russian officials: transcript". USA Today.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  88. 88.0 88.1 Bertrand, Natasha (October 5, 2017). "Congressional and FBI investigators are homing in on the Trump-Russia dossier". Business Insider. Retrieved November 6, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  89. Perez, Evan; Prokupecz, Shimon; Brown, Pamela (October 25, 2017). "Mueller's team met with Russia dossier author". CNN. Retrieved November 5, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  90. Feldman, Kate (November 2, 2017). "Hillary Clinton defends funding Steele dossier on Trump, Russia". New York Daily News. Retrieved November 6, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  91. 91.0 91.1 Hart, Benjamin (December 30, 2017). "Report: Papadopoulos, Not Dossier, Sparked Russia Investigation". New York magazine. Retrieved December 31, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  92. 92.0 92.1 LaFraniere, Sharon; Mazzetti, Mark; Apuzzo, Matt (December 30, 2017). "How the Russia Inquiry Began: A Campaign Aide, Drinks and Talk of Political Dirt". The New York Times. Retrieved December 31, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  93. "Donald Trump attacks alleged Russian dossier as 'fake news' and slams Buzzfeed and CNN at press conference". The Telegraph. Retrieved January 18, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  94. Rascoe, Ayesha (January 11, 2017). "Trump assails 'phony' Russia dossier in chaotic news conference". Reuters. Retrieved January 11, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  95. Hartmann, Margaret. "Clapper Denounces 'Corrosive and Damaging' Trump Dossier Leak". Daily Intelligencer. Retrieved January 12, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  96. Weisman, Jonathan; Steinhauer, Jennifer (January 12, 2017). "Intelligence Chief's Olive Branch to Trump Gets Twisted in Translation". The New York Times.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  97. Neely, Bill (January 21, 2017). "Kremlin Spokesman: U.S. Intelligence Report on Russian Hacking 'Ridiculous'". NBC News. Retrieved January 15, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  98. "Putin: Those who leaked Trump dossier 'worse than prostitutes'". Fox News. January 17, 2017. Retrieved January 17, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  99. Dewan, Angela; Veselinovic, Milena. "Putin on Trump dossier claims: 'Rubbish'". CNN. Retrieved January 17, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  100. Macfarquhar, Neil (January 17, 2017). "Putin Says Accusations in Trump Dossier Are 'Clearly Fake'". The New York Times. Retrieved January 18, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  101. "Russia's Putin rejects Trump dossier report as plot against 'legitimacy' of president-elect". The Washington Post. Retrieved January 18, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  102. Harding, Luke; Hopkins, Nick (January 12, 2017). "Donald Trump dossier: intelligence sources vouch for author's credibility". The Guardian. Retrieved January 23, 2018.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  103. "'Garbage Document': Woodward Says US Intel Should Apologize Over Trump Dossier". Fox News. January 16, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles> (Open the "Read full article" link)
  104. Bergman, Ronen (January 12, 2017). "US intel sources warn Israel against sharing secrets with Trump administration". Ynetnews News.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  105. Goldstein, David; Hall, Kevin G.; Gordon, Greg (February 3, 2017). "BuzzFeed sued over its publication of uncorroborated Trump dossier". McClatchy DC.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  106. Rosenberg, Eli (February 4, 2017). "Russian Executive Sues BuzzFeed Over Unverified Trump Dossier". The New York Times.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  107. Cohen, Marshall (May 2, 2017). "Spy behind Trump dossier says info was never meant for public eyes". CNN. Retrieved May 3, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  108. Hunt, Kasie; Dilanian, Ken (March 2, 2017). "The Senate may call Christopher Steele to testify about Trump dossier". NBC News.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  109. Carney, Jordain (March 27, 2017). "Grassley wants details on firm tied to controversial Trump dossier". TheHill. Retrieved April 16, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  110. Arnsdorf, Isaac (March 31, 2017). "Grassley presses Justice Dept. on Russian ties to firm behind Trump dossier". Politico. Retrieved April 16, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  111. Ross, Brian; Mosk, Matthew; Schwartz, Rhonda (August 22, 2017). "Glenn Simpson key figure behind million-dollar dossier to face questions". ABC News. Retrieved August 23, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  112. Carter, Brandon (October 27, 2017). "CIA's ex-Russia chief: Unlike Steele, Trump Jr. took info Russia wanted to give". The Hill. Retrieved December 27, 2017.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  113. Shafer, Jack (January 13, 2018). "Week 34: The Dossier Strikes Back". Politico Magazine. Retrieved January 21, 2018.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  114. Jalonick, Mary (January 9, 2018). "Democratic report warns of Russian meddling in Europe, US". The Washington Post. Retrieved January 22, 2018.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  115. Stanglin, Doug (January 5, 2018). "GOP senators recommend criminal probe of 'Steele dossier' author". USA TODAY. Retrieved January 7, 2018. Christopher Steele, the former British spy who wrote an explosive ‘dossier’ containing damning allegations about President Trump's purported links to Russia.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  116. Fandos, Nicholas; Rosenberg, Matthew (December 15, 2017). "Republican Senators Raise Possible Charges Against Author of Trump Dossier". The New York Times. Retrieved January 6, 2018. Republicans on Friday made the first known congressional criminal referral in connection with the meddling.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  117. 117.0 117.1 Barrett, Devlin; Hamburger, Tom (January 5, 2018). "Senior Republican refers Trump dossier author for possible charges". The Washington Post. Retrieved January 5, 2018.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  118. Tau, Byron (January 5, 2018). "Senators Ask Justice Department to Open Criminal Probe Into Trump Dossier Author". Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Retrieved January 5, 2018.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  119. "Senators urge Trump dossier author probe". BBC News. January 5, 2018. Retrieved January 7, 2018.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  120. Dennis, Steven T. (January 8, 2017). "Grassley Won't Release Fusion GPS Transcript From Russia Probe". Bloomberg. Retrieved January 9, 2018.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  121. "Feinstein releases transcript of interview with Fusion GPS co-founder". POLITICO. Retrieved January 9, 2018.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  122. Barrett, Devlin; Hamburger, Tom (January 9, 2018). "Fusion GPS founder told Senate investigators the FBI had a whistleblower in Trump's network". Washington Post. Retrieved January 9, 2018.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  123. Jacobs, Jennifer (January 10, 2018). "Trump Lawyer Sues BuzzFeed, Fusion GPS on Russia Dossier Claims". Bloomberg Politics. Retrieved January 16, 2018.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  124. "House panel releases Glenn Simpson testimony transcript". Fox News. January 18, 2018.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  125. Singman, Brooke (January 18, 2018). "House Intelligence Committee votes to release transcript of interview with Fusion GPS boss". Fox News. Retrieved January 19, 2018.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  126. "Possible money laundering alleged in sales of Trump properties: Rep. Schiff". Reuters. January 18, 2018.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>

Further reading

External links

Template:Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections